about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,837 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and the second variable is The number of transportation security screeners in North Dakota.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The heightened state of unease over the possibility of a 'Con Air' sequel resulted in an influx of security personnel. It just goes to show, when it comes to Nic Cage, the need for increased security is always 'Raising Arizona.'

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars', depicting a busy airport in North Dakota. Show a large crowd of security screeners working diligently, while long lines of travelers are going through screenings. Additionally, include a movie poster of Nic Cage's film "Con Air" being replaced with a new one for a "Raising Arizona" sequel, creating excitement and concern among the security personnel. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and The number of transportation security screeners in North Dakota. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Symbolism An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Cybernetic art Vaporwave Charcoal
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and The number of transportation security screeners in North Dakota, in the following situation: The heightened state of unease over the possibility of a 'Con Air' sequel resulted in an influx of security personnel. It just goes to show, when it comes to Nic Cage, the need for increased security is always 'Raising Arizona.'. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a busy airport in North Dakota, a large crowd of security screeners is seen working diligently, with long lines of travelers going through screenings. Meanwhile, a movie poster of Nic Cage's film "Con Air" is replaced with a new one for a "Raising Arizona" sequel, creating a buzz of excitement and concern among the security personnel.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' ] and depicting this scene: In a busy airport in North Dakota, a large crowd of security screeners is seen working diligently, with long lines of travelers going through screenings. Meanwhile, a movie poster of Nic Cage's film "Con Air" is replaced with a new one for a "Raising Arizona" sequel, creating a buzz of excitement and concern among the security personnel. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars', depicting a busy airport in North Dakota. Show a large crowd of security screeners working diligently, while long lines of travelers are going through screenings. Additionally, include a movie poster of Nic Cage's film "Con Air" being replaced with a new one for a "Raising Arizona" sequel, creating excitement and concern among the security personnel.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in positively influenced The number of transportation security screeners in North Dakota. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Nicolas Cage on Stage: The Movie Craze and North Dakota's Screeners' Raise

The Journal of Popular Culture and Regional Economics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and The number of transportation security screeners in North Dakota. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from The Movie DB and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9022997 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Nicolas Cage on Stage: The Movie Craze and North Dakota's Screeners' Raise"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the unexplored territory of the relationship between the number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and the number of transportation security screeners in North Dakota. With a twinkle in our eyes and a penchant for puzzling correlations, we set out to uncover whether the silver screen prowess of Mr. Cage has any influence on the labor force in the plains of North Dakota. Our research team used data from The Movie DB and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to assess this nagging question. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9022997 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022, suggesting a strong positive correlation between the two variables. It seems that whenever Nicolas Cage graces the screen, there's a surge in the need for diligent individuals to guard the gateways of North Dakota. Perhaps he really is the "Cage" behind this phenomenon, shaping the labor market with his versatile performances. Let's just say, the data provided us with "Cage"-y insights, and we couldn't help but ponder if the transportation security screeners are part of the "National Treasure" guarding the state's skies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and The number of transportation security screeners in North Dakota. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Nicolas Cage on Stage: The Movie Craze and North Dakota's Screeners' Raise"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the unexplored territory of the relationship between the number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and the number of transportation security screeners in North Dakota. With a twinkle in our eyes and a penchant for puzzling correlations, we set out to uncover whether the silver screen prowess of Mr. Cage has any influence on the labor force in the plains of North Dakota. Our research team used data from The Movie DB and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to assess this nagging question. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9022997 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022, suggesting a strong positive correlation between the two variables. It seems that whenever Nicolas Cage graces the screen, there's a surge in the need for diligent individuals to guard the gateways of North Dakota. Perhaps he really is the "Cage" behind this phenomenon, shaping the labor market with his versatile performances. Let's just say, the data provided us with "Cage"-y insights, and we couldn't help but ponder if the transportation security screeners are part of the "National Treasure" guarding the state's skies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Lights, camera, correlation! The mesmerizing allure of Hollywood's glitz and glamour has always captivated both movie buffs and researchers alike. In this paper, we embark on a curious odyssey to unravel the mysterious link between the number of movies featuring the enigmatic Nicolas Cage and the bustling world of transportation security screeners in the heart of North Dakota. As we delve into this uncharted territory, we aim to shed light on whether the silver screen charisma of Mr. Cage wields an unexpected influence on the labor dynamics in the tranquil plains of North Dakota.

Speaking of "Cage" and "unusual influences," did you hear about the statistician who visited the zoo? He was particularly interested in the wild variability of the data!

Our quest for understanding this peculiar correlation between Mr. Cage and the vigilant guardians of North Dakota's transportation hubs was fueled by a Sherlock Holmes-like curiosity and a Sherlock Statistician's love for unraveling mysteries. The enthralling aroma of freshly woven statistical models and the cerebral melody of data analysis led us to The Movie Database, where we harvested data on the rambunctious reel escapades of none other than Nicolas Cage. Compiling a filmography packed with a kaleidoscope of characters, from treasure hunters to sorcerers, we felt an irresistible urge to "Cage" our enthusiasm… pardon the pun!

On the other side of the lens, we turned our gaze toward the diligent souls tasked with protecting the skies and sifting through the hustle and bustle of North Dakota's transportation infrastructure. The Bureau of Labor Statistics proved to be our treasure trove, providing us with the necessary data to gauge the ebb and flow of transportation security screener employment. Spoiler alert: it's a "Cage" match!

Oh, and what did the scientist say when he found two isotopes of helium? HeHe! In the world of scientific humor, that joke is totally "elemental."

Armed with statistical tools sharper than a surgeon's scalpel, we meticulously combed through a decade of data from 2012 to 2022, gleefully sifting through the digits and decimal points in search of patterns. Our analysis unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9022997, sending ripples of disbelief through our lab. At p < 0.01, the evidence of a strong positive correlation between the two variables seemed as clear as day. It appears that Mr. Cage's cinematic endeavors are more than just box office hits; they seem to be stirring ripples in the labor market. Is he the "Cage" behind this curious enigma?

As we unravel these findings, we couldn't help but wonder if these transportation security screeners are, in fact, part of the "National Treasure" safeguarding North Dakota's skies. With every twist and turn in the data, we found ourselves drawn into the "Cage" of unexpected correlations, proving once again that there's always a "niche" for statistical surprises.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and The number of transportation security screeners in North Dakota. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Nicolas Cage on Stage: The Movie Craze and North Dakota's Screeners' Raise"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the unexplored territory of the relationship between the number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and the number of transportation security screeners in North Dakota. With a twinkle in our eyes and a penchant for puzzling correlations, we set out to uncover whether the silver screen prowess of Mr. Cage has any influence on the labor force in the plains of North Dakota. Our research team used data from The Movie DB and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to assess this nagging question. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9022997 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022, suggesting a strong positive correlation between the two variables. It seems that whenever Nicolas Cage graces the screen, there's a surge in the need for diligent individuals to guard the gateways of North Dakota. Perhaps he really is the "Cage" behind this phenomenon, shaping the labor market with his versatile performances. Let's just say, the data provided us with "Cage"-y insights, and we couldn't help but ponder if the transportation security screeners are part of the "National Treasure" guarding the state's skies.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Lights, camera, correlation! The mesmerizing allure of Hollywood's glitz and glamour has always captivated both movie buffs and researchers alike. In this paper, we embark on a curious odyssey to unravel the mysterious link between the number of movies featuring the enigmatic Nicolas Cage and the bustling world of transportation security screeners in the heart of North Dakota. As we delve into this uncharted territory, we aim to shed light on whether the silver screen charisma of Mr. Cage wields an unexpected influence on the labor dynamics in the tranquil plains of North Dakota.
Speaking of "Cage" and "unusual influences," did you hear about the statistician who visited the zoo? He was particularly interested in the wild variability of the data!
Our quest for understanding this peculiar correlation between Mr. Cage and the vigilant guardians of North Dakota's transportation hubs was fueled by a Sherlock Holmes-like curiosity and a Sherlock Statistician's love for unraveling mysteries. The enthralling aroma of freshly woven statistical models and the cerebral melody of data analysis led us to The Movie Database, where we harvested data on the rambunctious reel escapades of none other than Nicolas Cage. Compiling a filmography packed with a kaleidoscope of characters, from treasure hunters to sorcerers, we felt an irresistible urge to "Cage" our enthusiasm… pardon the pun!
On the other side of the lens, we turned our gaze toward the diligent souls tasked with protecting the skies and sifting through the hustle and bustle of North Dakota's transportation infrastructure. The Bureau of Labor Statistics proved to be our treasure trove, providing us with the necessary data to gauge the ebb and flow of transportation security screener employment. Spoiler alert: it's a "Cage" match!
Oh, and what did the scientist say when he found two isotopes of helium? HeHe! In the world of scientific humor, that joke is totally "elemental."
Armed with statistical tools sharper than a surgeon's scalpel, we meticulously combed through a decade of data from 2012 to 2022, gleefully sifting through the digits and decimal points in search of patterns. Our analysis unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9022997, sending ripples of disbelief through our lab. At p < 0.01, the evidence of a strong positive correlation between the two variables seemed as clear as day. It appears that Mr. Cage's cinematic endeavors are more than just box office hits; they seem to be stirring ripples in the labor market. Is he the "Cage" behind this curious enigma?
As we unravel these findings, we couldn't help but wonder if these transportation security screeners are, in fact, part of the "National Treasure" safeguarding North Dakota's skies. With every twist and turn in the data, we found ourselves drawn into the "Cage" of unexpected correlations, proving once again that there's always a "niche" for statistical surprises.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

As we delve into the peculiar correlation between the number of movies featuring Nicolas Cage and the employment trends of transportation security screeners in North Dakota, it is essential to discuss the existing literature on celebrity influence on labor markets and the movie industry. In "Celebrity Power and Contestation in the Global Audio-Visual and Music Industries," Smith et al. explore the multifaceted impact of A-list celebrities on various sectors, shedding light on the potential ripple effects of their presence in the entertainment industry. Similarly, Doe's "The Economics of Movie Stardom" delves into the economics of film stardom, offering insights into the economic significance of prominent actors such as Nicolas Cage in shaping industry dynamics. These studies underscore the profound influence of celebrities on the labor market and the economic landscape, laying the groundwork for our exploration of the Cage-screeners phenomenon.

Speaking of prominent actors, I once told a Nicolas Cage joke to my friend, but he didn't laugh. I guess you could say it was "Face/Off."

In the realm of non-fiction literature, books such as "Hollywood Economics: How Extreme Uncertainty Shapes the Film Industry" by De Vany provide valuable insights into the intricate dynamics of the film industry, offering a glimpse into the factors that drive industry fluctuations. Furthermore, "The Economics of Screening and Risk Reduction in the Transportation Industry" by Friedman presents a relevant perspective on the role of risk reduction strategies in the transportation sector, laying the groundwork for our investigation into the employment trends of transportation security screeners.

Turning to the realm of fiction, novels such as "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown and "National Treasure" by Unknown Author offer gripping tales of mystery, treasure hunting, and unexpected correlations, albeit in a fictional context. While these stories may not provide empirical evidence of real-life correlations, they capture the imagination and highlight the allure of uncovering enigmatic links, mirroring our own intellectual pursuit in unraveling the Cage-screeners mystery.

In the name of thorough research, our team indulged in the curious adventures of "The Amazing Race" and "Ghost Adventures" as part of our efforts to grasp the nuances of transportation security and the intricacies of venturing into unknown terrains. These shows offered a peek into the challenges faced by individuals entrusted with ensuring the safety of transportation routes, adding a layer of context to our exploration of the labor dynamics in North Dakota.

On a lighter note, have you heard about the airport security guard who accidentally put on two different shoes? He quipped, "I guess you could say I'm a sole survivor of fashion disasters!"

In our journey to demystify the relationship between Nicolas Cage's cinematic ventures and the employment patterns of transportation security screeners in North Dakota, we draw from a diverse tapestry of literature and pop culture to inform our analysis and infuse our exploration with a touch of levity. As we navigate the labyrinth of academic discourse and entertainment, our findings aim to shed light on a correlation that might just be the "Cage" of unexpected labor market dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and The number of transportation security screeners in North Dakota. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from The Movie DB and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Nicolas Cage on Stage: The Movie Craze and North Dakota's Screeners' Raise"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the unexplored territory of the relationship between the number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and the number of transportation security screeners in North Dakota. With a twinkle in our eyes and a penchant for puzzling correlations, we set out to uncover whether the silver screen prowess of Mr. Cage has any influence on the labor force in the plains of North Dakota. Our research team used data from The Movie DB and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to assess this nagging question. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9022997 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022, suggesting a strong positive correlation between the two variables. It seems that whenever Nicolas Cage graces the screen, there's a surge in the need for diligent individuals to guard the gateways of North Dakota. Perhaps he really is the "Cage" behind this phenomenon, shaping the labor market with his versatile performances. Let's just say, the data provided us with "Cage"-y insights, and we couldn't help but ponder if the transportation security screeners are part of the "National Treasure" guarding the state's skies.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Lights, camera, correlation! The mesmerizing allure of Hollywood's glitz and glamour has always captivated both movie buffs and researchers alike. In this paper, we embark on a curious odyssey to unravel the mysterious link between the number of movies featuring the enigmatic Nicolas Cage and the bustling world of transportation security screeners in the heart of North Dakota. As we delve into this uncharted territory, we aim to shed light on whether the silver screen charisma of Mr. Cage wields an unexpected influence on the labor dynamics in the tranquil plains of North Dakota.
Speaking of "Cage" and "unusual influences," did you hear about the statistician who visited the zoo? He was particularly interested in the wild variability of the data!
Our quest for understanding this peculiar correlation between Mr. Cage and the vigilant guardians of North Dakota's transportation hubs was fueled by a Sherlock Holmes-like curiosity and a Sherlock Statistician's love for unraveling mysteries. The enthralling aroma of freshly woven statistical models and the cerebral melody of data analysis led us to The Movie Database, where we harvested data on the rambunctious reel escapades of none other than Nicolas Cage. Compiling a filmography packed with a kaleidoscope of characters, from treasure hunters to sorcerers, we felt an irresistible urge to "Cage" our enthusiasm… pardon the pun!
On the other side of the lens, we turned our gaze toward the diligent souls tasked with protecting the skies and sifting through the hustle and bustle of North Dakota's transportation infrastructure. The Bureau of Labor Statistics proved to be our treasure trove, providing us with the necessary data to gauge the ebb and flow of transportation security screener employment. Spoiler alert: it's a "Cage" match!
Oh, and what did the scientist say when he found two isotopes of helium? HeHe! In the world of scientific humor, that joke is totally "elemental."
Armed with statistical tools sharper than a surgeon's scalpel, we meticulously combed through a decade of data from 2012 to 2022, gleefully sifting through the digits and decimal points in search of patterns. Our analysis unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9022997, sending ripples of disbelief through our lab. At p < 0.01, the evidence of a strong positive correlation between the two variables seemed as clear as day. It appears that Mr. Cage's cinematic endeavors are more than just box office hits; they seem to be stirring ripples in the labor market. Is he the "Cage" behind this curious enigma?
As we unravel these findings, we couldn't help but wonder if these transportation security screeners are, in fact, part of the "National Treasure" safeguarding North Dakota's skies. With every twist and turn in the data, we found ourselves drawn into the "Cage" of unexpected correlations, proving once again that there's always a "niche" for statistical surprises.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Well, dear readers, strap yourselves in as we take you on a journey through the methodological maze that allowed us to unravel the tantalizing relationship between Mr. Cage's cinematic exploits and the guardians of North Dakota's transportation security.

First off, we must emphasize the painstaking efforts that went into wrangling and preparing the data for our statistical escapade. Our research team scoured the virtual landscapes of The Movie Database (TMDb) to curate a definitive list of every movie featuring the indefatigable Nicolas Cage from the years 2012 to 2022. Oh, the sheer thrill of combing through the celluloid legacy of this enigmatic artist – it was like mining for rare cinematic gems!

Once we pieced together the minutiae of Mr. Cage's on-screen appearances, it was time to wade into the empirical waters of transportation security screening. We delved into the depths of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, extracting labor force data specific to transportation security screeners in the picturesque plains of North Dakota. Pardon the pun, but this wasn't just a numbers game; it was a hunt for statistical gold amidst the statistical haystack.

With our data treasure chest brimming with movie counts and security screener figures, we summoned the spirits of statistical machinery to tame the unruly digits and reveal the underlying patterns. Utilizing the illustrious statistical software package, the magnificent SPSS, we concocted a cauldron of correlation analyses and regression models to tease out the association between Mr. Cage's cinematic presence and the employment trends of transportation security screeners in North Dakota. How's that for a statistical séance?

Intriguingly, our methodology also involved a fair amount of 'cage-rful' consideration for potential confounding variables and alternative explanations. We engaged in a rigorous process of variable selection and model refinement, ensuring that our findings weren't merely the byproduct of statistical happenstance. Oh, the joys of scientific scrutiny and the cautious dance with covariates!

Furthermore, to bolster the robustness of our findings, we opted for a longitudinal analysis, conducting our investigative endeavors across the entire decade, from 2012 to 2022. This allowed us to capture the undulating waves of cinematic output and labor dynamics, offering a panoramic view of the entwined fates of Mr. Cage's films and North Dakota's security screening cadre. It's safe to say; we were in it for the long 'Cage.'

Lastly, in the spirit of methodological transparency, we resorted to cross-validation techniques, assuring ourselves and our esteemed readers that our findings weren't a mathematical mirage. The "Cage"-y correlation we unraveled was subject to the rigorous tests and re-tests of statistical fortitude, emerging as a bona fide connection rather than a statistical 'cage' of echoes.

In sum, our methodological odyssey traversed the realms of data collection, statistical wizardry, and methodological due diligence, ultimately culminating in the unveiling of a compelling association between the elements of Mr. Cage's cinematic artistry and the labor force dynamics of North Dakota's transportation security screeners. It was a methodological 'Cage'-match made in statistical heaven!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and The number of transportation security screeners in North Dakota. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from The Movie DB and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9022997, r-squared of 0.8141447, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Nicolas Cage on Stage: The Movie Craze and North Dakota's Screeners' Raise"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the unexplored territory of the relationship between the number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and the number of transportation security screeners in North Dakota. With a twinkle in our eyes and a penchant for puzzling correlations, we set out to uncover whether the silver screen prowess of Mr. Cage has any influence on the labor force in the plains of North Dakota. Our research team used data from The Movie DB and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to assess this nagging question. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9022997 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022, suggesting a strong positive correlation between the two variables. It seems that whenever Nicolas Cage graces the screen, there's a surge in the need for diligent individuals to guard the gateways of North Dakota. Perhaps he really is the "Cage" behind this phenomenon, shaping the labor market with his versatile performances. Let's just say, the data provided us with "Cage"-y insights, and we couldn't help but ponder if the transportation security screeners are part of the "National Treasure" guarding the state's skies.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Lights, camera, correlation! The mesmerizing allure of Hollywood's glitz and glamour has always captivated both movie buffs and researchers alike. In this paper, we embark on a curious odyssey to unravel the mysterious link between the number of movies featuring the enigmatic Nicolas Cage and the bustling world of transportation security screeners in the heart of North Dakota. As we delve into this uncharted territory, we aim to shed light on whether the silver screen charisma of Mr. Cage wields an unexpected influence on the labor dynamics in the tranquil plains of North Dakota.
Speaking of "Cage" and "unusual influences," did you hear about the statistician who visited the zoo? He was particularly interested in the wild variability of the data!
Our quest for understanding this peculiar correlation between Mr. Cage and the vigilant guardians of North Dakota's transportation hubs was fueled by a Sherlock Holmes-like curiosity and a Sherlock Statistician's love for unraveling mysteries. The enthralling aroma of freshly woven statistical models and the cerebral melody of data analysis led us to The Movie Database, where we harvested data on the rambunctious reel escapades of none other than Nicolas Cage. Compiling a filmography packed with a kaleidoscope of characters, from treasure hunters to sorcerers, we felt an irresistible urge to "Cage" our enthusiasm… pardon the pun!
On the other side of the lens, we turned our gaze toward the diligent souls tasked with protecting the skies and sifting through the hustle and bustle of North Dakota's transportation infrastructure. The Bureau of Labor Statistics proved to be our treasure trove, providing us with the necessary data to gauge the ebb and flow of transportation security screener employment. Spoiler alert: it's a "Cage" match!
Oh, and what did the scientist say when he found two isotopes of helium? HeHe! In the world of scientific humor, that joke is totally "elemental."
Armed with statistical tools sharper than a surgeon's scalpel, we meticulously combed through a decade of data from 2012 to 2022, gleefully sifting through the digits and decimal points in search of patterns. Our analysis unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9022997, sending ripples of disbelief through our lab. At p < 0.01, the evidence of a strong positive correlation between the two variables seemed as clear as day. It appears that Mr. Cage's cinematic endeavors are more than just box office hits; they seem to be stirring ripples in the labor market. Is he the "Cage" behind this curious enigma?
As we unravel these findings, we couldn't help but wonder if these transportation security screeners are, in fact, part of the "National Treasure" safeguarding North Dakota's skies. With every twist and turn in the data, we found ourselves drawn into the "Cage" of unexpected correlations, proving once again that there's always a "niche" for statistical surprises.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9022997 between the number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and the number of transportation security screeners employed in North Dakota. This strong positive correlation was supported by an r-squared value of 0.8141447, leaving little doubt about the robustness of the relationship. With p < 0.01, the evidence was as convincing as one of Mr. Cage's gripping performances. It seems the "Cage" effect is not confined to the silver screen; it extends its reach to the labor market of North Dakota.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) vividly illustrates the compelling association between the two variables, depicting a pattern that seems almost scripted. If we may be so bold, one could say the correlation is as clear as the vision of hindsight – a "Nicolas" clear vision, that is.

One might even venture to posit that the statistical synergy between Nicolas Cage's cinematic escapades and the employment of transportation security screeners in North Dakota is akin to a well-orchestrated plot twist – unexpected yet undeniably present. It's almost as if the data were teasing us, saying, "You don't have to be a 'Cage'y statistician to see the connections here!"

In essence, the sheer magnitude of this correlation beckons us to consider the possibility of Nicolas Cage not only captivating audiences but also influencing the ebb and flow of the job market in North Dakota. The "Face/Off" between the number of films featuring Mr. Cage and the employment of transportation security screeners unfolds like a thriller, leaving us to mull over whether this correlation is merely a curious coincidence or a noteworthy revelation worthy of further exploration.

Our results offer a tantalizing glimpse into the enigmatic influence of the silver screen on the fabric of employment dynamics, raising questions that appeal to the researcher and movie enthusiast alike. This correlation is indeed a "Cage"y mystery worth pondering, as it intertwines the worlds of cinema and labor in a manner that seems to elicit an encore – begging the question, "Can we really 'Cage' this curious correlation or will it continue to elude our statistical grasp?"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and The number of transportation security screeners in North Dakota. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Nicolas Cage on Stage: The Movie Craze and North Dakota's Screeners' Raise"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the unexplored territory of the relationship between the number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and the number of transportation security screeners in North Dakota. With a twinkle in our eyes and a penchant for puzzling correlations, we set out to uncover whether the silver screen prowess of Mr. Cage has any influence on the labor force in the plains of North Dakota. Our research team used data from The Movie DB and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to assess this nagging question. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9022997 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022, suggesting a strong positive correlation between the two variables. It seems that whenever Nicolas Cage graces the screen, there's a surge in the need for diligent individuals to guard the gateways of North Dakota. Perhaps he really is the "Cage" behind this phenomenon, shaping the labor market with his versatile performances. Let's just say, the data provided us with "Cage"-y insights, and we couldn't help but ponder if the transportation security screeners are part of the "National Treasure" guarding the state's skies.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
As we delve into the peculiar correlation between the number of movies featuring Nicolas Cage and the employment trends of transportation security screeners in North Dakota, it is essential to discuss the existing literature on celebrity influence on labor markets and the movie industry. In "Celebrity Power and Contestation in the Global Audio-Visual and Music Industries," Smith et al. explore the multifaceted impact of A-list celebrities on various sectors, shedding light on the potential ripple effects of their presence in the entertainment industry. Similarly, Doe's "The Economics of Movie Stardom" delves into the economics of film stardom, offering insights into the economic significance of prominent actors such as Nicolas Cage in shaping industry dynamics. These studies underscore the profound influence of celebrities on the labor market and the economic landscape, laying the groundwork for our exploration of the Cage-screeners phenomenon.
Speaking of prominent actors, I once told a Nicolas Cage joke to my friend, but he didn't laugh. I guess you could say it was "Face/Off."
In the realm of non-fiction literature, books such as "Hollywood Economics: How Extreme Uncertainty Shapes the Film Industry" by De Vany provide valuable insights into the intricate dynamics of the film industry, offering a glimpse into the factors that drive industry fluctuations. Furthermore, "The Economics of Screening and Risk Reduction in the Transportation Industry" by Friedman presents a relevant perspective on the role of risk reduction strategies in the transportation sector, laying the groundwork for our investigation into the employment trends of transportation security screeners.
Turning to the realm of fiction, novels such as "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown and "National Treasure" by Unknown Author offer gripping tales of mystery, treasure hunting, and unexpected correlations, albeit in a fictional context. While these stories may not provide empirical evidence of real-life correlations, they capture the imagination and highlight the allure of uncovering enigmatic links, mirroring our own intellectual pursuit in unraveling the Cage-screeners mystery.
In the name of thorough research, our team indulged in the curious adventures of "The Amazing Race" and "Ghost Adventures" as part of our efforts to grasp the nuances of transportation security and the intricacies of venturing into unknown terrains. These shows offered a peek into the challenges faced by individuals entrusted with ensuring the safety of transportation routes, adding a layer of context to our exploration of the labor dynamics in North Dakota.
On a lighter note, have you heard about the airport security guard who accidentally put on two different shoes? He quipped, "I guess you could say I'm a sole survivor of fashion disasters!"
In our journey to demystify the relationship between Nicolas Cage's cinematic ventures and the employment patterns of transportation security screeners in North Dakota, we draw from a diverse tapestry of literature and pop culture to inform our analysis and infuse our exploration with a touch of levity. As we navigate the labyrinth of academic discourse and entertainment, our findings aim to shed light on a correlation that might just be the "Cage" of unexpected labor market dynamics.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9022997 between the number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and the number of transportation security screeners employed in North Dakota. This strong positive correlation was supported by an r-squared value of 0.8141447, leaving little doubt about the robustness of the relationship. With p < 0.01, the evidence was as convincing as one of Mr. Cage's gripping performances. It seems the "Cage" effect is not confined to the silver screen; it extends its reach to the labor market of North Dakota.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) vividly illustrates the compelling association between the two variables, depicting a pattern that seems almost scripted. If we may be so bold, one could say the correlation is as clear as the vision of hindsight – a "Nicolas" clear vision, that is.
One might even venture to posit that the statistical synergy between Nicolas Cage's cinematic escapades and the employment of transportation security screeners in North Dakota is akin to a well-orchestrated plot twist – unexpected yet undeniably present. It's almost as if the data were teasing us, saying, "You don't have to be a 'Cage'y statistician to see the connections here!"
In essence, the sheer magnitude of this correlation beckons us to consider the possibility of Nicolas Cage not only captivating audiences but also influencing the ebb and flow of the job market in North Dakota. The "Face/Off" between the number of films featuring Mr. Cage and the employment of transportation security screeners unfolds like a thriller, leaving us to mull over whether this correlation is merely a curious coincidence or a noteworthy revelation worthy of further exploration.
Our results offer a tantalizing glimpse into the enigmatic influence of the silver screen on the fabric of employment dynamics, raising questions that appeal to the researcher and movie enthusiast alike. This correlation is indeed a "Cage"y mystery worth pondering, as it intertwines the worlds of cinema and labor in a manner that seems to elicit an encore – begging the question, "Can we really 'Cage' this curious correlation or will it continue to elude our statistical grasp?"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

Given the compelling findings of our analysis, the correlation between the number of movies featuring Nicolas Cage and the employment trends of transportation security screeners in North Dakota appears to be more than just a figment of statistical imagination. Our results align with prior research on celebrity influence on labor markets and the movie industry, reinforcing the notion that prominent actors like Mr. Cage can indeed exert a palpable impact on employment dynamics. It seems that when it comes to labor markets, Nicolas Cage's cinematic presence isn't just "Gone in 60 Seconds" – it leaves a lasting impression that reverberates in the plains of North Dakota.

We must acknowledge the influence of Mr. Cage's performances, which seem to orchestrate a compelling narrative that extends beyond the silver screen. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9022997, our findings point to a significant association between his cinematic ventures and the employment of transportation security screeners. The strength of this correlation is as clear as day – or should we say, as clear as a "Nicolas" day? It's almost as if the data were scripted to deliver this captivating storyline, leaving us to wonder if Nicolas Cage's movies aren't just entertainment; they're a statistical thriller of their own.

Our results prompt further consideration of the underlying mechanisms that drive this correlation. Is it simply a matter of heightened awareness and demand for security measures coinciding with the release of Mr. Cage's films, or does his on-screen magnetism truly shape the labor market dynamics in North Dakota? This "Cage"-y mystery may indeed be the focal point of subsequent investigations, inviting researchers to unravel the intricacies of celebrity influence on regional employment patterns.

In the grand scheme of statistical discoveries, this correlation presents an unexpected twist that captivates the imagination. It's a tale that leaves us pondering whether we've stumbled upon a statistical gem worthy of further exploration or if we're merely witnessing the "National Treasure" of coincidental patterns. Nevertheless, the correlation persists, beckoning us to step into the world of statistical hypothesis testing and seek answers to the question, "Can we really 'Cage' this curious correlation, or will it continue to elude our statistical grasp?"

As we traverse the terrain of empirical inquiry, one can't help but appreciate the whimsy woven into the fabric of statistical exploration. Whether it's testing hypotheses or unraveling enigmatic associations, the journey brings a touch of levity to the often-serious domain of academic research. And as it turns out, our findings suggest that the labor market of North Dakota may indeed have a soft spot for cinematic charisma that goes beyond entertainment – a revelation that may prompt a few wry smiles in the halls of statistical discourse. After all, who knew that statistical analysis could have a shot of "Cage"y humor in its midst?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and The number of transportation security screeners in North Dakota. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Nicolas Cage on Stage: The Movie Craze and North Dakota's Screeners' Raise"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the unexplored territory of the relationship between the number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and the number of transportation security screeners in North Dakota. With a twinkle in our eyes and a penchant for puzzling correlations, we set out to uncover whether the silver screen prowess of Mr. Cage has any influence on the labor force in the plains of North Dakota. Our research team used data from The Movie DB and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to assess this nagging question. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9022997 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022, suggesting a strong positive correlation between the two variables. It seems that whenever Nicolas Cage graces the screen, there's a surge in the need for diligent individuals to guard the gateways of North Dakota. Perhaps he really is the "Cage" behind this phenomenon, shaping the labor market with his versatile performances. Let's just say, the data provided us with "Cage"-y insights, and we couldn't help but ponder if the transportation security screeners are part of the "National Treasure" guarding the state's skies.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Lights, camera, correlation! The mesmerizing allure of Hollywood's glitz and glamour has always captivated both movie buffs and researchers alike. In this paper, we embark on a curious odyssey to unravel the mysterious link between the number of movies featuring the enigmatic Nicolas Cage and the bustling world of transportation security screeners in the heart of North Dakota. As we delve into this uncharted territory, we aim to shed light on whether the silver screen charisma of Mr. Cage wields an unexpected influence on the labor dynamics in the tranquil plains of North Dakota.
Speaking of "Cage" and "unusual influences," did you hear about the statistician who visited the zoo? He was particularly interested in the wild variability of the data!
Our quest for understanding this peculiar correlation between Mr. Cage and the vigilant guardians of North Dakota's transportation hubs was fueled by a Sherlock Holmes-like curiosity and a Sherlock Statistician's love for unraveling mysteries. The enthralling aroma of freshly woven statistical models and the cerebral melody of data analysis led us to The Movie Database, where we harvested data on the rambunctious reel escapades of none other than Nicolas Cage. Compiling a filmography packed with a kaleidoscope of characters, from treasure hunters to sorcerers, we felt an irresistible urge to "Cage" our enthusiasm… pardon the pun!
On the other side of the lens, we turned our gaze toward the diligent souls tasked with protecting the skies and sifting through the hustle and bustle of North Dakota's transportation infrastructure. The Bureau of Labor Statistics proved to be our treasure trove, providing us with the necessary data to gauge the ebb and flow of transportation security screener employment. Spoiler alert: it's a "Cage" match!
Oh, and what did the scientist say when he found two isotopes of helium? HeHe! In the world of scientific humor, that joke is totally "elemental."
Armed with statistical tools sharper than a surgeon's scalpel, we meticulously combed through a decade of data from 2012 to 2022, gleefully sifting through the digits and decimal points in search of patterns. Our analysis unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9022997, sending ripples of disbelief through our lab. At p < 0.01, the evidence of a strong positive correlation between the two variables seemed as clear as day. It appears that Mr. Cage's cinematic endeavors are more than just box office hits; they seem to be stirring ripples in the labor market. Is he the "Cage" behind this curious enigma?
As we unravel these findings, we couldn't help but wonder if these transportation security screeners are, in fact, part of the "National Treasure" safeguarding North Dakota's skies. With every twist and turn in the data, we found ourselves drawn into the "Cage" of unexpected correlations, proving once again that there's always a "niche" for statistical surprises.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9022997 between the number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and the number of transportation security screeners employed in North Dakota. This strong positive correlation was supported by an r-squared value of 0.8141447, leaving little doubt about the robustness of the relationship. With p < 0.01, the evidence was as convincing as one of Mr. Cage's gripping performances. It seems the "Cage" effect is not confined to the silver screen; it extends its reach to the labor market of North Dakota.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) vividly illustrates the compelling association between the two variables, depicting a pattern that seems almost scripted. If we may be so bold, one could say the correlation is as clear as the vision of hindsight – a "Nicolas" clear vision, that is.
One might even venture to posit that the statistical synergy between Nicolas Cage's cinematic escapades and the employment of transportation security screeners in North Dakota is akin to a well-orchestrated plot twist – unexpected yet undeniably present. It's almost as if the data were teasing us, saying, "You don't have to be a 'Cage'y statistician to see the connections here!"
In essence, the sheer magnitude of this correlation beckons us to consider the possibility of Nicolas Cage not only captivating audiences but also influencing the ebb and flow of the job market in North Dakota. The "Face/Off" between the number of films featuring Mr. Cage and the employment of transportation security screeners unfolds like a thriller, leaving us to mull over whether this correlation is merely a curious coincidence or a noteworthy revelation worthy of further exploration.
Our results offer a tantalizing glimpse into the enigmatic influence of the silver screen on the fabric of employment dynamics, raising questions that appeal to the researcher and movie enthusiast alike. This correlation is indeed a "Cage"y mystery worth pondering, as it intertwines the worlds of cinema and labor in a manner that seems to elicit an encore – begging the question, "Can we really 'Cage' this curious correlation or will it continue to elude our statistical grasp?"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we bid adieu to this intriguing exploration, it's evident that Nicolas Cage's cinematic ventures hold an unexpected sway not only over moviegoers but also over the employment dynamics in North Dakota. The correlation coefficient of 0.9022997 between the number of films featuring Mr. Cage and the employment of transportation security screeners illuminates a connection that's as undeniable as a dad's love for his "Con-Air" conditioning jokes. One could even say that this correlation is the "Raising Arizona" of unexpected statistical discoveries!

The robustness of this relationship, supported by an r-squared value of 0.8141447, underscores the need to "Cage" these findings within the realm of curious statistical phenomena. It seems that Mr. Cage's on-screen escapades have the power to "Face/Off" with the labor market dynamics, triggering a surge in the employment of transportation security screeners. In fact, one might say that these findings are "Cage"ing our imaginations and beckoning us to contemplate the broader implications of Hollywood's influence on regional job markets.

But, let's not get "Gone in 60 Seconds" with further speculation. As integral as these findings are, it's safe to say that no further research is needed in the "Nicolas Cage and North Dakota" domain. We've unraveled the mystery, and it seems that when it comes to Mr. Cage's impact on the labor market, the data has shown us the "Leaving Las Vegas" sign – there's no doubt about the correlation. We've certainly tapped into a "National Treasure" of odd correlations, and with that, it's time to "Cage" these statistical musings and bid farewell to this peculiarly fascinating chapter in research.

Now, if only we could find a correlation between the number of dad jokes in academic papers and their impact on readers' amusement levels. Alas, that might just be the "Ghost Rider" of statistical inquiries!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Nicolas Cage on Stage: The Movie Craze and North Dakota's Screeners' Raise. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Popular Culture and Regional Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Nicolas Cage on Stage: The Movie Craze and North Dakota's Screeners' Raise. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Cinematic Analysis and Theatrical Studies (SCATS)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Nicolas Cage on Stage: The Movie Craze and North Dakota's Screeners' Raise with an abstract of In this research paper, we delve into the unexplored territory of the relationship between the number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and the number of transportation security screeners in North Dakota. With a twinkle in our eyes and a penchant for puzzling correlations, we set out to uncover whether the silver screen prowess of Mr. Cage has any influence on the labor force in the plains of North Dakota. Our research team used data from The Movie DB and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to assess this nagging question. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9022997 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022, suggesting a strong positive correlation between the two variables. It seems that whenever Nicolas Cage graces the screen, there's a surge in the need for diligent individuals to guard the gateways of North Dakota. Perhaps he really is the "Cage" behind this phenomenon, shaping the labor market with his versatile performances. Let's just say, the data provided us with "Cage"-y insights, and we couldn't help but ponder if the transportation security screeners are part of the "National Treasure" guarding the state's skies.

ChatGPT:

Nicolas Cage, movies, filmography, transportation security screeners, North Dakota, labor force, correlation coefficient, Bureau of Labor Statistics, The Movie DB, labor market, "National Treasure" film, silver screen, correlation analysis, labor trends

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in
Source: The Movie DB
Additional Info: Raising Arizona (1987); Leaving Las Vegas (1995); Wild at Heart (1990); City of Angels (1998); Ghost Rider (2007); Con Air (1997); Captain Corelli's Mandolin (2001); Lord of War (2005); World Trade Center (2006); Adaptation. (2002); Red Rock West (1993); It Could Happen to You (1994); The Family Man (2000); Fire Birds (1990); Guarding Tess (1994); Season of the Witch (2011); National Treasure: Book of Secrets (2007); The Weather Man (2005); Vampire's Kiss (1988); Trapped in Paradise (1994); Matchstick Men (2003); Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call - New Orleans (2009); 8MM (1999); Bringing Out the Dead (1999); Snake Eyes (1998); Windtalkers (2002); Gone in Sixty Seconds (2000); The Wicker Man (2006); The Sorcerer's Apprentice (2010); Bangkok Dangerous (2008); Knowing (2009); Zandalee (1991); Astro Boy (2009); Drive Angry (2011); The Croods (2013); Valley Girl (1983); Trespass (2011); Time to Kill (1989); Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance (2011); The Boy in Blue (1986); Seeking Justice (2011); Stolen (2012); Joe (2014); The Frozen Ground (2013); Left Behind (2014); Rage (2014); Dying of the Light (2014); Outcast (2014); USS Indianapolis: Men of Courage (2016); Looking Glass (2018); The Trust (2016); The Runner (2015); Pay the Ghost (2015); Next (2007); Army of One (2016); Dog Eat Dog (2016); Vengeance: A Love Story (2017); Mom and Dad (2018); Arsenal (2017); Inconceivable (2017); The Humanity Bureau (2017); Mandy (2018); Primal (2019); 211 (2018); Between Worlds (2018); A Score to Settle (2019); Running with the Devil (2019); Prisoners of the Ghostland (2021); Kill Chain (2020); The Croods: A New Age (2020); Grand Isle (2019); Color Out of Space (2019); Werewolf Women of the S.S. (2007); Pig (2021); Willy's Wonderland (2021); The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent (2022); Butcher's Crossing (2023); The Retirement Plan (2023); The Old Way (2023); Valley Girl: In Conversation - Nicolas Cage And Martha Coolidge (2003); Dream Scenario (2023); Sympathy for the Devil (2023); National Treasure (2004); Face/Off (1997); Peggy Sue Got Married (1986); Moonstruck (1987); Birdy (1984); Kiss of Death (1995); Amos & Andrew (1993); Honeymoon in Vegas (1992); The Rock (1996); Industrial Symphony No. 1: The Dream of the Brokenhearted (1990); Racing with the Moon (1984); Jiu Jitsu (2020); Renfield (2023); Valley Girl: 20 Totally Tubular Years Later (2003); Hot Pink Horror: The Making of Color Out of Space (2020); Kick-Ass (2010); Deadfall (1993); The Ant Bully (2006); Christmas Carol: The Movie (2001); The Best of Times (1981); Shirley Maclaine: Kicking Up Her Heels (1996); Dear Diary: World's First Pranks (2021); I am My Films, Part 2... 30 Years Later (2010); Crossings: John Woo (2004); Never on Tuesday (1989); Love, Antosha (2019); Junket Whore (1998); Becoming Iconic (2018); Sonny (2002); G-Force (2009); With Great Power: The Stan Lee Story (2010); The Music of Valley Girl (2003); Rumble Fish (1983); The Cotton Club (1984); Final Cut: Ladies and Gentlemen (2012); Inside the Golden Statue (1998); Teen Titans Go! To the Movies (2018); Snowden (2016); Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse (2018); Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired (2008); Intimate Portrait: Sean Connery (1998); Fast Times at Ridgemont High (1982); The Death of "Superman Lives": What Happened? (2015); Moonstruck: At the Heart of an Italian Family (2006); Brubaker (1980); Grindhouse (2007); The Flash (2023); Mythos Hollywood - Das Geheimnis des Erfolgs (1998); Live 8 (2005)

See what else correlates with The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in

The number of transportation security screeners in North Dakota
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of transportation security screeners in North Dakota
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of transportation security screeners in North Dakota

Correlation r = 0.9022997 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8141447 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of transportation security screeners in North Dakota) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00014. 0.0001445635304961544000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 0.014% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 6,917 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.66, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in (Movie appearances)22535486441
The number of transportation security screeners in North Dakota (Laborers)140140160140150150160160150150140




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2,2,5,3,5,4,8,6,4,4,1,])
array_2 = np.array([140,140,160,140,150,150,160,160,150,150,140,])
array_1_name = "The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in"
array_2_name = "The number of transportation security screeners in North Dakota"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 5837 · Black Variable ID: 26630 · Red Variable ID: 19382
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0