about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,807 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho and the second variable is Disney movies released.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Idahoans became less politically active, they also became less inclined to watch movies, leading to a decrease in demand for Disney films nationwide. It's as if the Magic Kingdom lost its electoral college appeal!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a minimalistic Idaho landscape at sunset, with a sparse, defined line of citizens heading towards polling stations to vote for the Republican Presidential candidate. Simultaneously, a minimalist local movie theater scene should be depicted, with a noticeable decrease in the number of people waiting in line for tickets to the latest Disney movie, indicating a decline in civic engagement and interest in Disney films. The overall composition should capture the dwindling crowd, symbolizing decreased political activity and a declining demand for Disney films. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho and Disney movies released. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Data cyber art Cyberpunk Surrealism Minimalism Glitch art
ChatGPT: Minimalism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho and Disney movies released, in the following situation: As Idahoans became less politically active, they also became less inclined to watch movies, leading to a decrease in demand for Disney films nationwide. It's as if the Magic Kingdom lost its electoral college appeal!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: As the sun sets over the Idaho landscape, fewer and fewer citizens can be seen lining up at the polling stations to vote for the Republican Presidential candidate. Meanwhile, at the local movie theater, the marquee advertises the latest Disney movie, but there are noticeably fewer people waiting in line for tickets. The dwindling crowd shows that Idahoans have become less politically active and less inclined to watch movies, symbolizing a decrease in demand for Disney films across the nation.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Minimalism ] and depicting this scene: As the sun sets over the Idaho landscape, fewer and fewer citizens can be seen lining up at the polling stations to vote for the Republican Presidential candidate. Meanwhile, at the local movie theater, the marquee advertises the latest Disney movie, but there are noticeably fewer people waiting in line for tickets. The dwindling crowd shows that Idahoans have become less politically active and less inclined to watch movies, symbolizing a decrease in demand for Disney films across the nation. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a minimalistic Idaho landscape at sunset, with a sparse, defined line of citizens heading towards polling stations to vote for the Republican Presidential candidate. Simultaneously, a minimalist local movie theater scene should be depicted, with a noticeable decrease in the number of people waiting in line for tickets to the latest Disney movie, indicating a decline in civic engagement and interest in Disney films. The overall composition should capture the dwindling crowd, symbolizing decreased political activity and a declining demand for Disney films.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho caused Disney movies released to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Idaho Votes and Disney Quotes: Examining the Relationship Between Republican Presidential Voting Trends and Disney Movie Releases

The Journal of Political Cartoons and Pop Culture Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho and Disney movies released. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Box Office Mojo to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8288807 and p < 0.05 for 2000 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Idaho Votes and Disney Quotes: Examining the Relationship Between Republican Presidential Voting Trends and Disney Movie Releases"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper puts the "Pocahontas" in statistical analysis, as we scrutinize the potential correlation between votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in the state of Idaho and the releases of Disney movies. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Box Office Mojo, we present a comprehensive analysis spanning the period from 2000 to 2020. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8288807 and p < 0.05, leaving us to wonder if perhaps Mickey Mouse might have some political pull in the Gem State. As the Magic Kingdom meets the Grand Ole Party, our research seeks to shed light on the enchanting relationship between politics and popular culture, because, after all, "It's kind of fun to do the impossible!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho and Disney movies released. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Idaho Votes and Disney Quotes: Examining the Relationship Between Republican Presidential Voting Trends and Disney Movie Releases"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper puts the "Pocahontas" in statistical analysis, as we scrutinize the potential correlation between votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in the state of Idaho and the releases of Disney movies. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Box Office Mojo, we present a comprehensive analysis spanning the period from 2000 to 2020. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8288807 and p < 0.05, leaving us to wonder if perhaps Mickey Mouse might have some political pull in the Gem State. As the Magic Kingdom meets the Grand Ole Party, our research seeks to shed light on the enchanting relationship between politics and popular culture, because, after all, "It's kind of fun to do the impossible!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Politics and popular culture have always been an odd couple – like a Republican and a Democrat walking into a bar. But what happens when we throw Disney movies into the mix? Could the release of Aladdin or The Lion King actually have an impact on voting patterns? It's time to dive deep into the data and see if there's more to this relationship than just "hakuna matata."

The United States prides itself on being a melting pot of cultures, ideas, and voting preferences. In the midst of this diverse landscape, a curious trend has caught our attention – the intriguing correlation between votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho and the whimsical world of Disney movie releases. It's like the ultimate crossover episode, where the Magic Kingdom meets the land of the potato...er, the Gem State. Get ready to buckle up for a statistically enchanting ride through the realms of political preferences and animated classics.

As any good researcher knows, correlation does not imply causation. But if we find a strong association between Idaho's political leanings and the arrival of Disney's beloved characters on the silver screen, we might just have to rethink our understanding of the sway of popular culture on voting behavior. It's like trying to figure out if the chicken came before the egg, or if "let it go" became a campaign slogan before we realized it was a hit song.

The scope of this study spans the years from 2000 to 2020, capturing an era of political turbulence and Disney cinematic magic. It's a bit like conducting an experiment in Wonderland – there's a lot of curiouser and curiouser going on, but we're determined to make sense of it all.

Now, before we embark on this research journey, we must acknowledge the skepticism that may surround our investigation. Some may raise their eyebrows and quip, "What does Elsa have to do with elections?" But we remain undaunted, ready to unravel the mysteries that lie within the data and perhaps discover that, much like a Disney villain's dastardly plan, the connection between Idaho votes and Disney quotes is more than meets the eye. So, grab your Mickey ears and let's embark on this statistical odyssey, for as the Cheshire Cat once said, "We're all mad here."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho and Disney movies released. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Idaho Votes and Disney Quotes: Examining the Relationship Between Republican Presidential Voting Trends and Disney Movie Releases"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper puts the "Pocahontas" in statistical analysis, as we scrutinize the potential correlation between votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in the state of Idaho and the releases of Disney movies. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Box Office Mojo, we present a comprehensive analysis spanning the period from 2000 to 2020. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8288807 and p < 0.05, leaving us to wonder if perhaps Mickey Mouse might have some political pull in the Gem State. As the Magic Kingdom meets the Grand Ole Party, our research seeks to shed light on the enchanting relationship between politics and popular culture, because, after all, "It's kind of fun to do the impossible!"

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Politics and popular culture have always been an odd couple – like a Republican and a Democrat walking into a bar. But what happens when we throw Disney movies into the mix? Could the release of Aladdin or The Lion King actually have an impact on voting patterns? It's time to dive deep into the data and see if there's more to this relationship than just "hakuna matata."
The United States prides itself on being a melting pot of cultures, ideas, and voting preferences. In the midst of this diverse landscape, a curious trend has caught our attention – the intriguing correlation between votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho and the whimsical world of Disney movie releases. It's like the ultimate crossover episode, where the Magic Kingdom meets the land of the potato...er, the Gem State. Get ready to buckle up for a statistically enchanting ride through the realms of political preferences and animated classics.
As any good researcher knows, correlation does not imply causation. But if we find a strong association between Idaho's political leanings and the arrival of Disney's beloved characters on the silver screen, we might just have to rethink our understanding of the sway of popular culture on voting behavior. It's like trying to figure out if the chicken came before the egg, or if "let it go" became a campaign slogan before we realized it was a hit song.
The scope of this study spans the years from 2000 to 2020, capturing an era of political turbulence and Disney cinematic magic. It's a bit like conducting an experiment in Wonderland – there's a lot of curiouser and curiouser going on, but we're determined to make sense of it all.
Now, before we embark on this research journey, we must acknowledge the skepticism that may surround our investigation. Some may raise their eyebrows and quip, "What does Elsa have to do with elections?" But we remain undaunted, ready to unravel the mysteries that lie within the data and perhaps discover that, much like a Disney villain's dastardly plan, the connection between Idaho votes and Disney quotes is more than meets the eye. So, grab your Mickey ears and let's embark on this statistical odyssey, for as the Cheshire Cat once said, "We're all mad here."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

This literature review seeks to synthesize existing research and insights related to the connection between votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho and the releases of Disney movies. The investigation delves into studies that touch upon political behavior, popular culture, and the whimsical influences of animated entertainment. Our exploration begins with a serious examination of scholarly works on voting patterns and culminates in a lighthearted journey through fictional and, dare we say, whimsical sources.

In "Smith et al.'s Analysis of Republican Voting Trends," the authors find that examining voting trends in Idaho offers valuable insights into political leanings. Similar to how one might find the beauty in a classic Disney movie quote, the authors uncover nuances in voting behavior that may shed light on the state's political landscape.

Doe and Jones, in "The Influence of Pop Culture on Political Preferences," examine the potential impact of popular culture on voting behavior. Just as beloved Disney movies have the power to captivate audiences with their magical storytelling, the authors consider how elements of popular culture may shape individuals' political preferences.

Turning to non-fiction sources, "The Mouse Betwixt the Elephants: An Analysis of Disney's Socio-Political Influence" by Disney Scholar and "When Donald Met Dumbo: A Political Analysis of Disney Movie Releases" by Cinema Critic, present unique perspectives on the intertwining of Disney's entertainment empire and political discourse. As we navigate through these real-world and academic analyses, it becomes evident that there is more to this topic than meets the eye - much like hiding Easter eggs in a Pixar film.

Transitioning to fiction, the literary world offers intriguing parallels, or perhaps flights of fancy, that resonate with our exploration. "The Lion's Roar: Political Maneuvers in an Animated Kingdom" and "Election Magic: Spells and Ballots" are just a few titles that evoke the spirit of our inquiry. With a wink to these fictitious titles, it is clear that the blend of politics and animated worlds is a topic that captures the imagination and invites a touch of whimsy.

As our investigation takes flight, it is important to acknowledge the diversity of sources that inform our understanding of the Idaho voter-Disney movie relationship. From scholarly analyses to works of imagination, we have endeavored to capture the essence of this intriguing correlation. And yes, it is worth mentioning that, in the spirit of thorough research, we may or may not have delved into the depths of unconventional sources, such as perusing CVS receipts for hidden messages from Idaho voters. But fear not, dear reader, for every unexpected turn in our literature review is accompanied by a statistical wink and a knowing nod. After all, "Who's to say that a little magic can't sway a political ballot?"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho and Disney movies released. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Box Office Mojo . You used data from 2000 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Idaho Votes and Disney Quotes: Examining the Relationship Between Republican Presidential Voting Trends and Disney Movie Releases"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper puts the "Pocahontas" in statistical analysis, as we scrutinize the potential correlation between votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in the state of Idaho and the releases of Disney movies. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Box Office Mojo, we present a comprehensive analysis spanning the period from 2000 to 2020. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8288807 and p < 0.05, leaving us to wonder if perhaps Mickey Mouse might have some political pull in the Gem State. As the Magic Kingdom meets the Grand Ole Party, our research seeks to shed light on the enchanting relationship between politics and popular culture, because, after all, "It's kind of fun to do the impossible!"

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Politics and popular culture have always been an odd couple – like a Republican and a Democrat walking into a bar. But what happens when we throw Disney movies into the mix? Could the release of Aladdin or The Lion King actually have an impact on voting patterns? It's time to dive deep into the data and see if there's more to this relationship than just "hakuna matata."
The United States prides itself on being a melting pot of cultures, ideas, and voting preferences. In the midst of this diverse landscape, a curious trend has caught our attention – the intriguing correlation between votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho and the whimsical world of Disney movie releases. It's like the ultimate crossover episode, where the Magic Kingdom meets the land of the potato...er, the Gem State. Get ready to buckle up for a statistically enchanting ride through the realms of political preferences and animated classics.
As any good researcher knows, correlation does not imply causation. But if we find a strong association between Idaho's political leanings and the arrival of Disney's beloved characters on the silver screen, we might just have to rethink our understanding of the sway of popular culture on voting behavior. It's like trying to figure out if the chicken came before the egg, or if "let it go" became a campaign slogan before we realized it was a hit song.
The scope of this study spans the years from 2000 to 2020, capturing an era of political turbulence and Disney cinematic magic. It's a bit like conducting an experiment in Wonderland – there's a lot of curiouser and curiouser going on, but we're determined to make sense of it all.
Now, before we embark on this research journey, we must acknowledge the skepticism that may surround our investigation. Some may raise their eyebrows and quip, "What does Elsa have to do with elections?" But we remain undaunted, ready to unravel the mysteries that lie within the data and perhaps discover that, much like a Disney villain's dastardly plan, the connection between Idaho votes and Disney quotes is more than meets the eye. So, grab your Mickey ears and let's embark on this statistical odyssey, for as the Cheshire Cat once said, "We're all mad here."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unpack the enigmatic relationship between votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho and the release dates of Disney movies, our research team set sail on a statistical adventure worthy of a swashbuckler's tale. Channeling the spirit of Sherlock Holmes and the determination of Hercules, we meticulously gathered data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Box Office Mojo. It was a bit like hunting for buried treasure, except the treasure map had scatterplots and regression analysis instead of X marks the spot.

Our first step in this scientific escapade was to collect state-level voting data from the aforementioned sources. We then donned our research capes and conducted a thorough examination of all Disney movie releases in the specified timeframe. This task felt a bit like trying to find a needle in a haystack, but we embraced the challenge with the enthusiasm of a Pixar protagonist.

With our data in hand, we embarked on a statistical journey through the realms of correlation analysis and time series modeling. We summoned the powerful tools of Pearson's correlation coefficient and conducted a series of t-tests to assess the significance of our findings. It was a bit like casting spells with statistical formulas, and we couldn't help but feel a kinship with Hermione Granger as we delved deep into the wizardry of data analysis.

To ensure the robustness of our findings, we employed a sophisticated multivariate regression model, incorporating variables such as release dates of Disney movies, box office performance, and the political landscape of Idaho. It was a bit like conducting a delicate waltz between variables, making sure each step was statistically significant and danced to the rhythm of our research question.

In our pursuit of scientific rigor and statistical gallantry, we also conducted sensitivity analyses and diagnostic tests to assess the reliability of our results. It was like performing a check-up on our statistical models, ensuring they were as sturdy as a Disney castle and as reliable as a trusty sidekick.

Now, as we unleash the findings of our statistical saga, we invite readers to join us in this whimsical journey through the intersection of politics and animation. For as Walt Disney once said, "It's kind of fun to do the impossible," and we wholeheartedly embraced that spirit in our pursuit of unraveling the mystical connection between Idaho votes and Disney quotes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho and Disney movies released. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Box Office Mojo .

For the time period 2000 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8288807, r-squared of 0.6870432, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Idaho Votes and Disney Quotes: Examining the Relationship Between Republican Presidential Voting Trends and Disney Movie Releases"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper puts the "Pocahontas" in statistical analysis, as we scrutinize the potential correlation between votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in the state of Idaho and the releases of Disney movies. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Box Office Mojo, we present a comprehensive analysis spanning the period from 2000 to 2020. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8288807 and p < 0.05, leaving us to wonder if perhaps Mickey Mouse might have some political pull in the Gem State. As the Magic Kingdom meets the Grand Ole Party, our research seeks to shed light on the enchanting relationship between politics and popular culture, because, after all, "It's kind of fun to do the impossible!"

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Politics and popular culture have always been an odd couple – like a Republican and a Democrat walking into a bar. But what happens when we throw Disney movies into the mix? Could the release of Aladdin or The Lion King actually have an impact on voting patterns? It's time to dive deep into the data and see if there's more to this relationship than just "hakuna matata."
The United States prides itself on being a melting pot of cultures, ideas, and voting preferences. In the midst of this diverse landscape, a curious trend has caught our attention – the intriguing correlation between votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho and the whimsical world of Disney movie releases. It's like the ultimate crossover episode, where the Magic Kingdom meets the land of the potato...er, the Gem State. Get ready to buckle up for a statistically enchanting ride through the realms of political preferences and animated classics.
As any good researcher knows, correlation does not imply causation. But if we find a strong association between Idaho's political leanings and the arrival of Disney's beloved characters on the silver screen, we might just have to rethink our understanding of the sway of popular culture on voting behavior. It's like trying to figure out if the chicken came before the egg, or if "let it go" became a campaign slogan before we realized it was a hit song.
The scope of this study spans the years from 2000 to 2020, capturing an era of political turbulence and Disney cinematic magic. It's a bit like conducting an experiment in Wonderland – there's a lot of curiouser and curiouser going on, but we're determined to make sense of it all.
Now, before we embark on this research journey, we must acknowledge the skepticism that may surround our investigation. Some may raise their eyebrows and quip, "What does Elsa have to do with elections?" But we remain undaunted, ready to unravel the mysteries that lie within the data and perhaps discover that, much like a Disney villain's dastardly plan, the connection between Idaho votes and Disney quotes is more than meets the eye. So, grab your Mickey ears and let's embark on this statistical odyssey, for as the Cheshire Cat once said, "We're all mad here."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the curious correlation between votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho and the release of Disney movies from 2000 to 2020 have revealed a statistically significant relationship. Our analysis yielded a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8288807, indicating a strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that the political landscape in Idaho may indeed be influenced by the magical world of Disney, or as some might say, "It's a small world after all."

Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.6870432, suggesting that approximately 68.7% of the variability in the Republican presidential votes in Idaho can be explained by the timing of Disney movie releases. It's like using math to solve a magic spell – the numbers reveal a spellbinding connection between two unexpected domains.

Fig. 1 shows the scatterplot depicting the relationship between the votes for the Republican candidate and the release dates of Disney movies. The data points form a clear upward trend, highlighting the synchronization between these variables. It's as if Cinderella's glass slipper perfectly fits the plot line of our statistical analysis.

This significant finding paves the way for further exploration into the influence of popular culture on political preferences. Our results leave us pondering the intriguing possibility that, much like a Pixar movie with hidden Easter eggs, there may be unseen influences shaping electoral decisions. It's almost like finding a hidden Mickey in the ballot box – a surprise where you least expect it.

These results urge us to reconsider the impact of Disney's cinematic creations on the political inclinations of Idaho residents. As we delve deeper into this captivating relationship between electoral dynamics and animated storytelling, we are reminded of Walt Disney's wisdom: "If you can dream it, you can do it." And it looks like Disney's dreams may have extended into the political realm of the Gem State.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho and Disney movies released. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Idaho Votes and Disney Quotes: Examining the Relationship Between Republican Presidential Voting Trends and Disney Movie Releases"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper puts the "Pocahontas" in statistical analysis, as we scrutinize the potential correlation between votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in the state of Idaho and the releases of Disney movies. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Box Office Mojo, we present a comprehensive analysis spanning the period from 2000 to 2020. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8288807 and p < 0.05, leaving us to wonder if perhaps Mickey Mouse might have some political pull in the Gem State. As the Magic Kingdom meets the Grand Ole Party, our research seeks to shed light on the enchanting relationship between politics and popular culture, because, after all, "It's kind of fun to do the impossible!"

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
This literature review seeks to synthesize existing research and insights related to the connection between votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho and the releases of Disney movies. The investigation delves into studies that touch upon political behavior, popular culture, and the whimsical influences of animated entertainment. Our exploration begins with a serious examination of scholarly works on voting patterns and culminates in a lighthearted journey through fictional and, dare we say, whimsical sources.
In "Smith et al.'s Analysis of Republican Voting Trends," the authors find that examining voting trends in Idaho offers valuable insights into political leanings. Similar to how one might find the beauty in a classic Disney movie quote, the authors uncover nuances in voting behavior that may shed light on the state's political landscape.
Doe and Jones, in "The Influence of Pop Culture on Political Preferences," examine the potential impact of popular culture on voting behavior. Just as beloved Disney movies have the power to captivate audiences with their magical storytelling, the authors consider how elements of popular culture may shape individuals' political preferences.
Turning to non-fiction sources, "The Mouse Betwixt the Elephants: An Analysis of Disney's Socio-Political Influence" by Disney Scholar and "When Donald Met Dumbo: A Political Analysis of Disney Movie Releases" by Cinema Critic, present unique perspectives on the intertwining of Disney's entertainment empire and political discourse. As we navigate through these real-world and academic analyses, it becomes evident that there is more to this topic than meets the eye - much like hiding Easter eggs in a Pixar film.
Transitioning to fiction, the literary world offers intriguing parallels, or perhaps flights of fancy, that resonate with our exploration. "The Lion's Roar: Political Maneuvers in an Animated Kingdom" and "Election Magic: Spells and Ballots" are just a few titles that evoke the spirit of our inquiry. With a wink to these fictitious titles, it is clear that the blend of politics and animated worlds is a topic that captures the imagination and invites a touch of whimsy.
As our investigation takes flight, it is important to acknowledge the diversity of sources that inform our understanding of the Idaho voter-Disney movie relationship. From scholarly analyses to works of imagination, we have endeavored to capture the essence of this intriguing correlation. And yes, it is worth mentioning that, in the spirit of thorough research, we may or may not have delved into the depths of unconventional sources, such as perusing CVS receipts for hidden messages from Idaho voters. But fear not, dear reader, for every unexpected turn in our literature review is accompanied by a statistical wink and a knowing nod. After all, "Who's to say that a little magic can't sway a political ballot?"

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the curious correlation between votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho and the release of Disney movies from 2000 to 2020 have revealed a statistically significant relationship. Our analysis yielded a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8288807, indicating a strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that the political landscape in Idaho may indeed be influenced by the magical world of Disney, or as some might say, "It's a small world after all."
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.6870432, suggesting that approximately 68.7% of the variability in the Republican presidential votes in Idaho can be explained by the timing of Disney movie releases. It's like using math to solve a magic spell – the numbers reveal a spellbinding connection between two unexpected domains.
Fig. 1 shows the scatterplot depicting the relationship between the votes for the Republican candidate and the release dates of Disney movies. The data points form a clear upward trend, highlighting the synchronization between these variables. It's as if Cinderella's glass slipper perfectly fits the plot line of our statistical analysis.
This significant finding paves the way for further exploration into the influence of popular culture on political preferences. Our results leave us pondering the intriguing possibility that, much like a Pixar movie with hidden Easter eggs, there may be unseen influences shaping electoral decisions. It's almost like finding a hidden Mickey in the ballot box – a surprise where you least expect it.
These results urge us to reconsider the impact of Disney's cinematic creations on the political inclinations of Idaho residents. As we delve deeper into this captivating relationship between electoral dynamics and animated storytelling, we are reminded of Walt Disney's wisdom: "If you can dream it, you can do it." And it looks like Disney's dreams may have extended into the political realm of the Gem State.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8288807 discovered in our study has undoubtedly left us feeling like we've stumbled upon the "Magic Kingdom" of statistical relationships. It's as if the political landscape in Idaho has been under the spell of Disney's enchanting influence. This significant finding not only adds a touch of pixie dust to the field of political science but also raises the question: Are Idaho voters casting their ballots under the "circle of life" inspired by The Lion King or the patriotic fervor evoked by Mulan's "I'll Make a Man Out of You"? As Walt Disney once said, "Laughter is timeless, imagination has no age, dreams are forever," and indeed, our findings invite us to dream of the whimsical ways in which popular culture intertwines with political behavior.

Our results are in line with the prior research that has sought to explore the potential impact of popular culture on political preferences. Much like the enduring appeal of Disney characters, the influence of Disney movies appears to resonate far beyond the silver screen and into the realm of Idaho's election ballots. In a manner reminiscent of a Disney plot twist, our research has illuminated the magical bond between the release of Disney movies and the voting patterns for the Republican presidential candidate in Idaho.

The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.6870432 further substantiates the substantial influence of Disney movie releases on the variability in the Republican presidential votes in Idaho. It's as if we've uncovered the hidden formula for a successful musical number, where the timing of Disney movie releases becomes the key to understanding a significant portion of the variability in political preferences. It's statistics meets Disney sorcery, adding a whole new meaning to the phrase "crunching the numbers."

The scatterplot, akin to a canvas for a magical art piece, vividly depicts the synchronicity between Idaho's political preferences and the release dates of Disney movies. It's as if we've stumbled upon a "tale as old as time," where the two seemingly disparate variables harmonize into a beautiful, coherent narrative. This unexpected relationship reveals that perhaps, in the political theatre of Idaho, the drama of Disney movies plays a leading role. It's like walking through a door labeled "Statistical Analysis" and finding oneself in a parallel universe of fantastical correlations.

In conclusion, our research highlights the captivating relationship between votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho and the releases of Disney movies. The statistical evidence has given us a glimpse into the enchanting influence of popular culture on political behavior, and much like the timeless appeal of Disney movies, our findings are sure to leave an enduring impression. As Walt Disney famously remarked, "All our dreams can come true if we have the courage to pursue them," and it seems that even the dreams of a cartoon mouse may hold sway in the real world of politics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho and Disney movies released. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Idaho Votes and Disney Quotes: Examining the Relationship Between Republican Presidential Voting Trends and Disney Movie Releases"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper puts the "Pocahontas" in statistical analysis, as we scrutinize the potential correlation between votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in the state of Idaho and the releases of Disney movies. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Box Office Mojo, we present a comprehensive analysis spanning the period from 2000 to 2020. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8288807 and p < 0.05, leaving us to wonder if perhaps Mickey Mouse might have some political pull in the Gem State. As the Magic Kingdom meets the Grand Ole Party, our research seeks to shed light on the enchanting relationship between politics and popular culture, because, after all, "It's kind of fun to do the impossible!"

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Politics and popular culture have always been an odd couple – like a Republican and a Democrat walking into a bar. But what happens when we throw Disney movies into the mix? Could the release of Aladdin or The Lion King actually have an impact on voting patterns? It's time to dive deep into the data and see if there's more to this relationship than just "hakuna matata."
The United States prides itself on being a melting pot of cultures, ideas, and voting preferences. In the midst of this diverse landscape, a curious trend has caught our attention – the intriguing correlation between votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho and the whimsical world of Disney movie releases. It's like the ultimate crossover episode, where the Magic Kingdom meets the land of the potato...er, the Gem State. Get ready to buckle up for a statistically enchanting ride through the realms of political preferences and animated classics.
As any good researcher knows, correlation does not imply causation. But if we find a strong association between Idaho's political leanings and the arrival of Disney's beloved characters on the silver screen, we might just have to rethink our understanding of the sway of popular culture on voting behavior. It's like trying to figure out if the chicken came before the egg, or if "let it go" became a campaign slogan before we realized it was a hit song.
The scope of this study spans the years from 2000 to 2020, capturing an era of political turbulence and Disney cinematic magic. It's a bit like conducting an experiment in Wonderland – there's a lot of curiouser and curiouser going on, but we're determined to make sense of it all.
Now, before we embark on this research journey, we must acknowledge the skepticism that may surround our investigation. Some may raise their eyebrows and quip, "What does Elsa have to do with elections?" But we remain undaunted, ready to unravel the mysteries that lie within the data and perhaps discover that, much like a Disney villain's dastardly plan, the connection between Idaho votes and Disney quotes is more than meets the eye. So, grab your Mickey ears and let's embark on this statistical odyssey, for as the Cheshire Cat once said, "We're all mad here."

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the curious correlation between votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho and the release of Disney movies from 2000 to 2020 have revealed a statistically significant relationship. Our analysis yielded a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8288807, indicating a strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that the political landscape in Idaho may indeed be influenced by the magical world of Disney, or as some might say, "It's a small world after all."
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.6870432, suggesting that approximately 68.7% of the variability in the Republican presidential votes in Idaho can be explained by the timing of Disney movie releases. It's like using math to solve a magic spell – the numbers reveal a spellbinding connection between two unexpected domains.
Fig. 1 shows the scatterplot depicting the relationship between the votes for the Republican candidate and the release dates of Disney movies. The data points form a clear upward trend, highlighting the synchronization between these variables. It's as if Cinderella's glass slipper perfectly fits the plot line of our statistical analysis.
This significant finding paves the way for further exploration into the influence of popular culture on political preferences. Our results leave us pondering the intriguing possibility that, much like a Pixar movie with hidden Easter eggs, there may be unseen influences shaping electoral decisions. It's almost like finding a hidden Mickey in the ballot box – a surprise where you least expect it.
These results urge us to reconsider the impact of Disney's cinematic creations on the political inclinations of Idaho residents. As we delve deeper into this captivating relationship between electoral dynamics and animated storytelling, we are reminded of Walt Disney's wisdom: "If you can dream it, you can do it." And it looks like Disney's dreams may have extended into the political realm of the Gem State.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unveiled a captivating correlation between votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho and the releases of Disney movies from 2000 to 2020. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8288807 and p < 0.05 suggests that the enchanting world of animated classics may indeed have an unexpected influence on political preferences in the Gem State. It's as if Idaho voters are saying, "I can go the distance" with their support for the Republican candidate.

This statistical connection, much like a Disney plot twist, has left us pleasantly surprised. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.6870432 adds to this enchantment, indicating that approximately 68.7% of the variability in Republican presidential votes in Idaho can be traced back to the timing of Disney movie releases. It's like the ultimate plot twist in a captivating statistical saga – who would have thought that Idaho's political scene would be intertwined with the magic of Disney?

As we reflect on these findings, it's clear that our understanding of the intersection between popular culture and political behavior has taken on a new dimension. The scatterplot depicting the relationship between Idaho's Republican votes and Disney movie release dates forms a picture-perfect narrative, akin to a well-crafted animation sequence. It's almost as if Idahoans are singing, "I just can't wait to be red" when it comes to their political preferences.

Our research unearths a delightful confluence of seemingly disparate elements – politics and Disney – challenging us to embrace the unexpected connections that unfold in the world of statistics. It's like discovering a hidden Mickey in the midst of a data analysis – a delightful surprise that adds a touch of magic to our research endeavors.

In light of these compelling findings, it's safe to say that our investigation has successfully shed light on the synergistic relationship between Idaho's political landscape and Disney's cinematic endeavors. And just like a well-timed punchline, our results leave us with a sense of wonder and amusement at the whimsical ways in which statistical analysis can reveal surprising patterns. It's like we've uncovered the genie's lamp and released a statistical wish come true.

In conclusion, our research suggests that further exploration into the influence of popular culture on political preferences is warranted, but as for the specific connection between Idaho votes and Disney quotes, it seems that the magic of statistics has spoken. As the saying goes, "The past can hurt, but the way I see it, you can either run from it or learn from it." And in the case of our findings, it seems we've learned that the statistical connection between Idaho votes and Disney movies is indeed a tale as old as time. With that said, it appears that no further research in this area is needed; we've reached the happily ever after of this statistical story.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Idaho Votes and Disney Quotes: Examining the Relationship Between Republican Presidential Voting Trends and Disney Movie Releases. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Political Cartoons and Pop Culture Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Idaho Votes and Disney Quotes: Examining the Relationship Between Republican Presidential Voting Trends and Disney Movie Releases. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Political Animation and Entertainment Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Idaho Votes and Disney Quotes: Examining the Relationship Between Republican Presidential Voting Trends and Disney Movie Releases with an abstract of This paper puts the "Pocahontas" in statistical analysis, as we scrutinize the potential correlation between votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in the state of Idaho and the releases of Disney movies. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Box Office Mojo, we present a comprehensive analysis spanning the period from 2000 to 2020. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8288807 and p < 0.05, leaving us to wonder if perhaps Mickey Mouse might have some political pull in the Gem State. As the Magic Kingdom meets the Grand Ole Party, our research seeks to shed light on the enchanting relationship between politics and popular culture, because, after all, "It's kind of fun to do the impossible!

ChatGPT:

Idaho voting trends, Republican presidential candidate, Disney movie releases, correlation analysis, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, Box Office Mojo, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, popular culture and politics, Mickey Mouse, Gem State, political pull, Disney quotes, Republican voting trends

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho

Disney movies released
Detailed data title: Disney Movie Release Count
Source: Box Office Mojo
See what else correlates with Disney movies released

Correlation r = 0.8288807 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6870432 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 68.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Disney movies released) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho) over the 6 years from 2000 through 2020.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.041. 0.0414173973937391000000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 4.1% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 24 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.05, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200020042008201220162020
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho (Percentage of votes)67.170468.390961.517164.529859.261463.8376
Disney movies released (Disney movies)333316121323




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([67.1704,68.3909,61.5171,64.5298,59.2614,63.8376,])
array_2 = np.array([33,33,16,12,13,23,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Idaho"
array_2_name = "Disney movies released"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!


Correlation ID: 5807 · Black Variable ID: 26087 · Red Variable ID: 12
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0