about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,798 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama and the second variable is The number of executive administrative assistants in Alabama.  The chart goes from 2010 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air cleared in Decatur, the executive administrative assistants realized they could finally breathe easy too, leading many to pursue their dreams outside of the office. It seems the smog was clouding their career judgment, but now they've all taken a breath of fresh air and decided to switch gears. Now they're off to find roles that don't keep them constantly filing complaints about their work environment.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [Concept art] Generate an image of the Decatur, Alabama skyline with clean, clear air and a bright atmosphere. Show the silhouette of office buildings, highlighting a diverse group of executive administrative assistants stepping out of their offices, their expressions reflecting relief and optimism. Additionally, include subtle visual cues indicating their transition to new career paths – perhaps by showing them carrying briefcases or engaging in professional activities. This should convey the sense of freedom and possibility brought on by the improved air quality. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama and The number of executive administrative assistants in Alabama. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cubism Surrealism A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Concept art a funny image macro
ChatGPT: Concept art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama and The number of executive administrative assistants in Alabama, in the following situation: As the air cleared in Decatur, the executive administrative assistants realized they could finally breathe easy too, leading many to pursue their dreams outside of the office. It seems the smog was clouding their career judgment, but now they've all taken a breath of fresh air and decided to switch gears. Now they're off to find roles that don't keep them constantly filing complaints about their work environment.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Decatur, Alabama, the city skyline was clear and bright after efforts to reduce air pollution. Amidst the clean air, executive administrative assistants could be seen stepping out of their offices, breathing easy as they embarked on new career paths, no longer confined by the smog that had clouded their aspirations.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Concept art ] and depicting this scene: In Decatur, Alabama, the city skyline was clear and bright after efforts to reduce air pollution. Amidst the clean air, executive administrative assistants could be seen stepping out of their offices, breathing easy as they embarked on new career paths, no longer confined by the smog that had clouded their aspirations. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [Concept art] Generate an image of the Decatur, Alabama skyline with clean, clear air and a bright atmosphere. Show the silhouette of office buildings, highlighting a diverse group of executive administrative assistants stepping out of their offices, their expressions reflecting relief and optimism. Additionally, include subtle visual cues indicating their transition to new career paths – perhaps by showing them carrying briefcases or engaging in professional activities. This should convey the sense of freedom and possibility brought on by the improved air quality.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama caused The number of executive administrative assistants in Alabama to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Puzzling Pairing of Pollution and PAs: A Quirky Quest in Decatur, Alabama

The Journal of Ecological Enigmas

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama and The number of executive administrative assistants in Alabama. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9570268 and p < 0.01 for 2010 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Puzzling Pairing of Pollution and PAs: A Quirky Quest in Decatur, Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the surprisingly peculiar relationship between air pollution in Decatur, Alabama and the number of executive administrative assistants in the state. Our research team flexed their data analysis muscles and uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9570268 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2010 to 2022. The findings may leave you breathless, as we unravel the whimsical connection between pollutants in the air and the personnel populating the administrative profession. Join us on this whimsical journey as we navigate through the smoggy skies and administrative memos to illuminate this delightful correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama and The number of executive administrative assistants in Alabama. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Puzzling Pairing of Pollution and PAs: A Quirky Quest in Decatur, Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the surprisingly peculiar relationship between air pollution in Decatur, Alabama and the number of executive administrative assistants in the state. Our research team flexed their data analysis muscles and uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9570268 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2010 to 2022. The findings may leave you breathless, as we unravel the whimsical connection between pollutants in the air and the personnel populating the administrative profession. Join us on this whimsical journey as we navigate through the smoggy skies and administrative memos to illuminate this delightful correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ah, the wondrous world of research - where we strive to untangle the enigmatic and often befuddling relationships between seemingly unrelated variables. In the curious case of Decatur, Alabama, we have stumbled upon a most unlikely pair - air pollution and the number of executive administrative assistants. As intrigued researchers with an insatiable appetite for quirky correlations, we embarked on a whimsical quest to unearth the connection between pollutants in the air and the professionals managing administrative affairs.

The air in Decatur might not be as clear as the data we seek, but fear not, dear readers, for our trusty statistical tools and pun-riddled ponderings have led us down an unexpected path. Our irrepressible research team, armed with p-values and correlation coefficients, set out to demystify this puzzling pairing of pollution and PAs.

Now, as we venture into this laughter-inducing labyrinth of variables, prepare to be amused, astounded, and possibly befuddled by the peculiar findings that await. Yes, we dare to uncover what others may deem inconceivable - the playful dance of pollutants and administrative assistants in the state of Alabama. It's a statistical tango of sorts, with pollutants waltzing in the air and executive administrative assistants cha-cha-ing through the corporate corridors.

So, grab your lab coat and your sense of humor, for we're about to blend the rigors of research with a dash of delightful absurdity. Our findings, while unconventional, promise to provoke both chuckles and contemplation in equal measure. Let us navigate through this capricious correlation and reveal the whimsical secrets that lie beneath the smoky skies of Decatur.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama and The number of executive administrative assistants in Alabama. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Puzzling Pairing of Pollution and PAs: A Quirky Quest in Decatur, Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the surprisingly peculiar relationship between air pollution in Decatur, Alabama and the number of executive administrative assistants in the state. Our research team flexed their data analysis muscles and uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9570268 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2010 to 2022. The findings may leave you breathless, as we unravel the whimsical connection between pollutants in the air and the personnel populating the administrative profession. Join us on this whimsical journey as we navigate through the smoggy skies and administrative memos to illuminate this delightful correlation.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the wondrous world of research - where we strive to untangle the enigmatic and often befuddling relationships between seemingly unrelated variables. In the curious case of Decatur, Alabama, we have stumbled upon a most unlikely pair - air pollution and the number of executive administrative assistants. As intrigued researchers with an insatiable appetite for quirky correlations, we embarked on a whimsical quest to unearth the connection between pollutants in the air and the professionals managing administrative affairs.
The air in Decatur might not be as clear as the data we seek, but fear not, dear readers, for our trusty statistical tools and pun-riddled ponderings have led us down an unexpected path. Our irrepressible research team, armed with p-values and correlation coefficients, set out to demystify this puzzling pairing of pollution and PAs.
Now, as we venture into this laughter-inducing labyrinth of variables, prepare to be amused, astounded, and possibly befuddled by the peculiar findings that await. Yes, we dare to uncover what others may deem inconceivable - the playful dance of pollutants and administrative assistants in the state of Alabama. It's a statistical tango of sorts, with pollutants waltzing in the air and executive administrative assistants cha-cha-ing through the corporate corridors.
So, grab your lab coat and your sense of humor, for we're about to blend the rigors of research with a dash of delightful absurdity. Our findings, while unconventional, promise to provoke both chuckles and contemplation in equal measure. Let us navigate through this capricious correlation and reveal the whimsical secrets that lie beneath the smoky skies of Decatur.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "The Relation Between Air Pollution and Occupational Trends in Alabama," Smith et al. delve into the intricate web of associations between environmental factors and labor demographics. Their findings suggest a potential link between air pollutants and the workforce composition, hinting at a surreal synergy between atmospheric particulate matter and administrative personnel. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones, in "Atmospheric Anomalies and Administrative Avocations," bring forth compelling evidence of a thought-provoking correlation between air quality metrics and professional vocations.

As we venture further into the realm of literature, we encounter "The Toxic Tango: A Statistical Serenade" by Adams and Brown, a whimsical exploration of the inexplicable relationship between atmospheric pollutants and occupational categories. This fanciful foray into statistical serenades presents an amusing rendition of the dance between environmental hazards and administrative prowess.

Turning to intriguing non-fiction works, "Breathless in Decatur: A Tale of Pollution and Personnel" by Greenaway provides a whimsical yet informative account of the environmental challenges in Decatur, weaving a narrative that mirrors the enigmatic dance of administrative assistants in the corporate landscape.

In the realm of fiction, "The Smoggy Saga of Executive Exploits" by Waters and "Administrative Adventures in the Hazy Horizon" by Taylor offer fictional portrayals that, while not empirically grounded, add a touch of whimsy to our understanding of the interplay between air pollution and administrative roles.

On a cinematic note, "Polluted Pursuits: A Tale of Administrative Intrigue" and "The Executive Air Affair" are must-see films that, while not explicitly related to our research, provide a quirky and entertaining portrayal of administrative maneuverings amidst the backdrop of environmental challenges.

As we gaze upon this medley of literature and entertainment, one cannot help but chuckle at the surreal symphony of pollutants and administrative personnel, a conundrum that beckons us to embrace the whimsy and wonder of statistical exploration. Whether waltzing to the tune of p-values or indulging in the absurdity of correlation coefficients, our venture into the literature has certainly enlivened our pursuit of unraveling this delightful correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama and The number of executive administrative assistants in Alabama. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2010 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Puzzling Pairing of Pollution and PAs: A Quirky Quest in Decatur, Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the surprisingly peculiar relationship between air pollution in Decatur, Alabama and the number of executive administrative assistants in the state. Our research team flexed their data analysis muscles and uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9570268 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2010 to 2022. The findings may leave you breathless, as we unravel the whimsical connection between pollutants in the air and the personnel populating the administrative profession. Join us on this whimsical journey as we navigate through the smoggy skies and administrative memos to illuminate this delightful correlation.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the wondrous world of research - where we strive to untangle the enigmatic and often befuddling relationships between seemingly unrelated variables. In the curious case of Decatur, Alabama, we have stumbled upon a most unlikely pair - air pollution and the number of executive administrative assistants. As intrigued researchers with an insatiable appetite for quirky correlations, we embarked on a whimsical quest to unearth the connection between pollutants in the air and the professionals managing administrative affairs.
The air in Decatur might not be as clear as the data we seek, but fear not, dear readers, for our trusty statistical tools and pun-riddled ponderings have led us down an unexpected path. Our irrepressible research team, armed with p-values and correlation coefficients, set out to demystify this puzzling pairing of pollution and PAs.
Now, as we venture into this laughter-inducing labyrinth of variables, prepare to be amused, astounded, and possibly befuddled by the peculiar findings that await. Yes, we dare to uncover what others may deem inconceivable - the playful dance of pollutants and administrative assistants in the state of Alabama. It's a statistical tango of sorts, with pollutants waltzing in the air and executive administrative assistants cha-cha-ing through the corporate corridors.
So, grab your lab coat and your sense of humor, for we're about to blend the rigors of research with a dash of delightful absurdity. Our findings, while unconventional, promise to provoke both chuckles and contemplation in equal measure. Let us navigate through this capricious correlation and reveal the whimsical secrets that lie beneath the smoky skies of Decatur.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

Ah, the time has come to unravel the methodological marvels that underpin our whimsical quest to decipher the intriguing correlation between air pollution in Decatur, Alabama, and the number of executive administrative assistants in the state of Alabama. Our data collection process was akin to a comedic caper, a zany and elaborate dance through the internet's corridors in search of the most entertaining and reliable information. Our mischievous exploration led us to sources such as the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, where we sifted through data from the years 2010 to 2022. Our journey was filled with moments of statistical discovery and mirthful insight, much like stumbling upon a treasure trove of quirky correlations in a scientific game of hide-and-seek.

We merrily gathered air pollution data from the Environmental Protection Agency, utilizing measurements of various pollutants such as ozone, particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide. These data were a smorgasbord of scientific selectors, leaving us chuckling as we manipulated and computed them using reputable statistical software. We mused upon the size and shape of the data, ensuring that it met all the requisite assumptions for our statistical analyses. It was a thrilling adventure that required careful attention to detail, with an occasional dash of statistical liberation to keep things lively.

On the administrative side, we sauntered into the world of employment statistics with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The number of executive administrative assistants in Alabama fascinated us as we jested about their curious relationship with the air pollutants. The data, much like a comedic script, provided us with a plot filled with twists and turns, as we converted it into a usable format for our research. We affectionately teased the figures, coaxing them into revealing their numerical secrets with the finesse of academic jesters on a mission to unravel the research puzzle.

As for the statistical analyses themselves, we engaged in a delightful dance of regression modeling, calculating correlation coefficients, and the determination of p-values. The statistical escapade led us through scatterplots, hypothesis testing, and model diagnostics, as we playfully dissected the relationship between air pollution and the number of executive administrative assistants. While the methods may sound serious, the process was imbued with our team's jovial spirit, much like conducting a scientific symphony with a touch of vaudeville flair.

Our unconventional yet rigorous methodology, infused with whimsy and scientific rigor, has enabled us to present our findings with a touch of levity and intrigue. So, dear readers, prepare yourselves for a merry romp through the correlations and statistical eccentricities that await in our whimsical journey through the clouds of Decatur.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama and The number of executive administrative assistants in Alabama. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2010 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9570268, r-squared of 0.9159003, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Puzzling Pairing of Pollution and PAs: A Quirky Quest in Decatur, Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the surprisingly peculiar relationship between air pollution in Decatur, Alabama and the number of executive administrative assistants in the state. Our research team flexed their data analysis muscles and uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9570268 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2010 to 2022. The findings may leave you breathless, as we unravel the whimsical connection between pollutants in the air and the personnel populating the administrative profession. Join us on this whimsical journey as we navigate through the smoggy skies and administrative memos to illuminate this delightful correlation.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ah, the wondrous world of research - where we strive to untangle the enigmatic and often befuddling relationships between seemingly unrelated variables. In the curious case of Decatur, Alabama, we have stumbled upon a most unlikely pair - air pollution and the number of executive administrative assistants. As intrigued researchers with an insatiable appetite for quirky correlations, we embarked on a whimsical quest to unearth the connection between pollutants in the air and the professionals managing administrative affairs.
The air in Decatur might not be as clear as the data we seek, but fear not, dear readers, for our trusty statistical tools and pun-riddled ponderings have led us down an unexpected path. Our irrepressible research team, armed with p-values and correlation coefficients, set out to demystify this puzzling pairing of pollution and PAs.
Now, as we venture into this laughter-inducing labyrinth of variables, prepare to be amused, astounded, and possibly befuddled by the peculiar findings that await. Yes, we dare to uncover what others may deem inconceivable - the playful dance of pollutants and administrative assistants in the state of Alabama. It's a statistical tango of sorts, with pollutants waltzing in the air and executive administrative assistants cha-cha-ing through the corporate corridors.
So, grab your lab coat and your sense of humor, for we're about to blend the rigors of research with a dash of delightful absurdity. Our findings, while unconventional, promise to provoke both chuckles and contemplation in equal measure. Let us navigate through this capricious correlation and reveal the whimsical secrets that lie beneath the smoky skies of Decatur.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our rigorous investigation into the captivating correlation between air pollution in Decatur, Alabama and the number of executive administrative assistants in the state has illuminated a truly remarkable relationship. The correlation coefficient of 0.9570268 and the r-squared value of 0.9159003 unveiled a strong and compelling connection that left our team marveling at the whimsical nature of statistical analysis.

With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings stand as a testament to the sheer incongruity of this pairing. The scatterplot (Fig. 1) that we present is a visual testament to the strong association between these seemingly unrelated variables, capturing the quirky dance of pollutants and administrative assistants in the realm of statistics.

This delightful correlation between the two variables may seem like a product of serendipity, but rest assured, our findings are firmly rooted in the realm of statistical significance and empirical evidence. The amusing interplay of pollutants and administrative personnel in the state of Alabama reflects the enchanting unpredictability that often typifies the world of research.

As we sifted through the smog of data and the flurry of administrative duties, our team couldn't help but chuckle at the delightful absurdity of this correlation. The staid world of statistical analysis was sprinkled with a dash of whimsy and wonder as we unraveled the enticing connection between the clarity of the air and the administrative landscape.

In sum, our research has unearthed a captivating correlation that defies conventional wisdom, infusing the scientific inquiry with an unexpected bout of hilarity and contemplation. The state of Alabama, with its administrative prowess and atmospheric idiosyncrasies, has become the stage for this comically inquisitive exploration into the intersections of pollutants and personnel.

Stay tuned for further elucidation in our discussion section, where we propel beyond the confines of statistical tomfoolery into the realm of grounded contemplation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama and The number of executive administrative assistants in Alabama. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Puzzling Pairing of Pollution and PAs: A Quirky Quest in Decatur, Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the surprisingly peculiar relationship between air pollution in Decatur, Alabama and the number of executive administrative assistants in the state. Our research team flexed their data analysis muscles and uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9570268 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2010 to 2022. The findings may leave you breathless, as we unravel the whimsical connection between pollutants in the air and the personnel populating the administrative profession. Join us on this whimsical journey as we navigate through the smoggy skies and administrative memos to illuminate this delightful correlation.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Relation Between Air Pollution and Occupational Trends in Alabama," Smith et al. delve into the intricate web of associations between environmental factors and labor demographics. Their findings suggest a potential link between air pollutants and the workforce composition, hinting at a surreal synergy between atmospheric particulate matter and administrative personnel. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones, in "Atmospheric Anomalies and Administrative Avocations," bring forth compelling evidence of a thought-provoking correlation between air quality metrics and professional vocations.
As we venture further into the realm of literature, we encounter "The Toxic Tango: A Statistical Serenade" by Adams and Brown, a whimsical exploration of the inexplicable relationship between atmospheric pollutants and occupational categories. This fanciful foray into statistical serenades presents an amusing rendition of the dance between environmental hazards and administrative prowess.
Turning to intriguing non-fiction works, "Breathless in Decatur: A Tale of Pollution and Personnel" by Greenaway provides a whimsical yet informative account of the environmental challenges in Decatur, weaving a narrative that mirrors the enigmatic dance of administrative assistants in the corporate landscape.
In the realm of fiction, "The Smoggy Saga of Executive Exploits" by Waters and "Administrative Adventures in the Hazy Horizon" by Taylor offer fictional portrayals that, while not empirically grounded, add a touch of whimsy to our understanding of the interplay between air pollution and administrative roles.
On a cinematic note, "Polluted Pursuits: A Tale of Administrative Intrigue" and "The Executive Air Affair" are must-see films that, while not explicitly related to our research, provide a quirky and entertaining portrayal of administrative maneuverings amidst the backdrop of environmental challenges.
As we gaze upon this medley of literature and entertainment, one cannot help but chuckle at the surreal symphony of pollutants and administrative personnel, a conundrum that beckons us to embrace the whimsy and wonder of statistical exploration. Whether waltzing to the tune of p-values or indulging in the absurdity of correlation coefficients, our venture into the literature has certainly enlivened our pursuit of unraveling this delightful correlation.

[[RESULTS]]
Our rigorous investigation into the captivating correlation between air pollution in Decatur, Alabama and the number of executive administrative assistants in the state has illuminated a truly remarkable relationship. The correlation coefficient of 0.9570268 and the r-squared value of 0.9159003 unveiled a strong and compelling connection that left our team marveling at the whimsical nature of statistical analysis.
With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings stand as a testament to the sheer incongruity of this pairing. The scatterplot (Fig. 1) that we present is a visual testament to the strong association between these seemingly unrelated variables, capturing the quirky dance of pollutants and administrative assistants in the realm of statistics.
This delightful correlation between the two variables may seem like a product of serendipity, but rest assured, our findings are firmly rooted in the realm of statistical significance and empirical evidence. The amusing interplay of pollutants and administrative personnel in the state of Alabama reflects the enchanting unpredictability that often typifies the world of research.
As we sifted through the smog of data and the flurry of administrative duties, our team couldn't help but chuckle at the delightful absurdity of this correlation. The staid world of statistical analysis was sprinkled with a dash of whimsy and wonder as we unraveled the enticing connection between the clarity of the air and the administrative landscape.
In sum, our research has unearthed a captivating correlation that defies conventional wisdom, infusing the scientific inquiry with an unexpected bout of hilarity and contemplation. The state of Alabama, with its administrative prowess and atmospheric idiosyncrasies, has become the stage for this comically inquisitive exploration into the intersections of pollutants and personnel.
Stay tuned for further elucidation in our discussion section, where we propel beyond the confines of statistical tomfoolery into the realm of grounded contemplation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The breathtaking correlation unearthed in our study between air pollution in Decatur, Alabama and the number of executive administrative assistants in the state has left our research team in stitches – of statistical delight, of course. Our findings have not only corroborated the prior research, but they have also added a quirky twist to the tale of environmental and labor dynamics.

The results of this investigation lend credence to the subtle yet uncanny dance between atmospheric disturbances and professional vocations. As we harken back to the literature review, who would have thought that the whimsical portrayals in "Breathless in Decatur: A Tale of Pollution and Personnel" and the fictional "Administrative Adventures in the Hazy Horizon" could hint at empirical truths? The statistical serenade of Adams and Brown's "The Toxic Tango" now appears less of a fanciful metaphor and more of a robust statistical duet between air pollutants and administrative prowess.

The sheer strength of the correlation coefficient has left our team nodding in awe and chuckling in equal measure. The strong association captured in the scatterplot (Fig. 1) presents a visual symphony that even the most skeptical observer would find compelling. It's a statistical waltz so enchanting that it leaves one yearning for more air-quality-inspired dance recitals.

The p-value, ever the gatekeeper of statistical significance, has stood at the grand entrance of our findings, allowing only the most significant relationships to prance into the limelight. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings boogie their way into the realm of unequivocal significance. The research community might find it hard to catch its breath with such an exciting revelation.

The delightful absurdity of this correlation has added a whimsical fuel to the bright flames of scientific inquiry. As we confront the comical incongruity of this pairing, we find ourselves embracing the unexpected hilarity and contemplation that come with dancing between the realms of pollutants and personnel. It's a research journey peppered with moments of statistical tomfoolery and statistical serenades, a quirky anecdote in the larger narrative of empirical exploration.

As we close this section, we invite our readers to join us in the next chapter of our odyssey – a realm where we steer clear of statistical comedy and delve into grounded contemplation. Stay tuned for a wondrous exploration of the implications and applications of this curious correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama and The number of executive administrative assistants in Alabama. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Puzzling Pairing of Pollution and PAs: A Quirky Quest in Decatur, Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the surprisingly peculiar relationship between air pollution in Decatur, Alabama and the number of executive administrative assistants in the state. Our research team flexed their data analysis muscles and uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9570268 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2010 to 2022. The findings may leave you breathless, as we unravel the whimsical connection between pollutants in the air and the personnel populating the administrative profession. Join us on this whimsical journey as we navigate through the smoggy skies and administrative memos to illuminate this delightful correlation.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ah, the wondrous world of research - where we strive to untangle the enigmatic and often befuddling relationships between seemingly unrelated variables. In the curious case of Decatur, Alabama, we have stumbled upon a most unlikely pair - air pollution and the number of executive administrative assistants. As intrigued researchers with an insatiable appetite for quirky correlations, we embarked on a whimsical quest to unearth the connection between pollutants in the air and the professionals managing administrative affairs.
The air in Decatur might not be as clear as the data we seek, but fear not, dear readers, for our trusty statistical tools and pun-riddled ponderings have led us down an unexpected path. Our irrepressible research team, armed with p-values and correlation coefficients, set out to demystify this puzzling pairing of pollution and PAs.
Now, as we venture into this laughter-inducing labyrinth of variables, prepare to be amused, astounded, and possibly befuddled by the peculiar findings that await. Yes, we dare to uncover what others may deem inconceivable - the playful dance of pollutants and administrative assistants in the state of Alabama. It's a statistical tango of sorts, with pollutants waltzing in the air and executive administrative assistants cha-cha-ing through the corporate corridors.
So, grab your lab coat and your sense of humor, for we're about to blend the rigors of research with a dash of delightful absurdity. Our findings, while unconventional, promise to provoke both chuckles and contemplation in equal measure. Let us navigate through this capricious correlation and reveal the whimsical secrets that lie beneath the smoky skies of Decatur.

[[RESULTS]]
Our rigorous investigation into the captivating correlation between air pollution in Decatur, Alabama and the number of executive administrative assistants in the state has illuminated a truly remarkable relationship. The correlation coefficient of 0.9570268 and the r-squared value of 0.9159003 unveiled a strong and compelling connection that left our team marveling at the whimsical nature of statistical analysis.
With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings stand as a testament to the sheer incongruity of this pairing. The scatterplot (Fig. 1) that we present is a visual testament to the strong association between these seemingly unrelated variables, capturing the quirky dance of pollutants and administrative assistants in the realm of statistics.
This delightful correlation between the two variables may seem like a product of serendipity, but rest assured, our findings are firmly rooted in the realm of statistical significance and empirical evidence. The amusing interplay of pollutants and administrative personnel in the state of Alabama reflects the enchanting unpredictability that often typifies the world of research.
As we sifted through the smog of data and the flurry of administrative duties, our team couldn't help but chuckle at the delightful absurdity of this correlation. The staid world of statistical analysis was sprinkled with a dash of whimsy and wonder as we unraveled the enticing connection between the clarity of the air and the administrative landscape.
In sum, our research has unearthed a captivating correlation that defies conventional wisdom, infusing the scientific inquiry with an unexpected bout of hilarity and contemplation. The state of Alabama, with its administrative prowess and atmospheric idiosyncrasies, has become the stage for this comically inquisitive exploration into the intersections of pollutants and personnel.
Stay tuned for further elucidation in our discussion section, where we propel beyond the confines of statistical tomfoolery into the realm of grounded contemplation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our whimsical odyssey through the smog-filled skies of Decatur, Alabama has led us to a most unexpected revelation - the enthralling and enigmatic connection between air pollution and the number of executive administrative assistants. As we reflect on our comical quest, it is clear that the statistical tango of pollutants and personnel has left us both amused and astounded. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9570268 and the tantalizingly low p-value have solidified this quirky pairing as a true gem in the realm of statistical curiosities.

Our findings, while perplexing to the uninitiated, have underscored the serendipitous charm that often permeates the world of research. The scatterplot (or should we say "scatter-plot") presented in Fig. 1 embodies the captivating dance of data points, capturing the whimsical waltz of pollutants and administrative assistants in the state of Alabama. It seems that the air in Decatur is not the only thing that's polluted - our minds have been delightfully polluted by the unexpected hilarity of this correlation.

As we bid adieu to this perplexing puzzle, we are left with no choice but to assert with utmost certainty that no further research is needed in this delightfully absurd area. It seems that this idiosyncratic correlation has been laid bare, leaving us all with a sense of wonder at the delightful absurdity that can be uncovered through rigorous statistical inquiry. And with that, dear readers, we leave you to ponder the whimsical wonders of science and statistics, where even the most unlikely pairings can lead to uproarious revelations.

In the words of the great statistical humorist (if such a thing exists), let this correlation be a reminder that in the world of research, the unexpected is always just around the corner. So, keep your data close and your sense of humor closer, for you never know when a statistical laugh riot might come knocking on your laboratory door.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Puzzling Pairing of Pollution and PAs: A Quirky Quest in Decatur, Alabama. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ecological Enigmas


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Puzzling Pairing of Pollution and PAs: A Quirky Quest in Decatur, Alabama. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Unconventional Environmental Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Puzzling Pairing of Pollution and PAs: A Quirky Quest in Decatur, Alabama with an abstract of In this paper, we delve into the surprisingly peculiar relationship between air pollution in Decatur, Alabama and the number of executive administrative assistants in the state. Our research team flexed their data analysis muscles and uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9570268 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2010 to 2022. The findings may leave you breathless, as we unravel the whimsical connection between pollutants in the air and the personnel populating the administrative profession. Join us on this whimsical journey as we navigate through the smoggy skies and administrative memos to illuminate this delightful correlation.

ChatGPT:

Decatur Alabama, air pollution correlation, executive administrative assistants, environmental impact, air quality analysis, pollutant effects, personnel correlation, correlation coefficient, p-value significance, data analysis, administrative profession, pollution impact on workforce

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Decatur, AL
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama

The number of executive administrative assistants in Alabama
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of executive secretaries and executive administrative assistants in Alabama
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of executive administrative assistants in Alabama

Correlation r = 0.9570268 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9159003 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 91.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of executive administrative assistants in Alabama) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama) over the 13 years from 2010 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.0E-7. 0.0000002977213283541507700000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 3.0E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,358,846 random variables You don't actually need 3 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.86, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama (Bad air quality days)48.199431.428623.321615.957416.197217.260316.712313.186816.483516.164413.44542020.8219
The number of executive administrative assistants in Alabama (Laborers)6520505041003310319033103300322032103310325029903110




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([48.1994,31.4286,23.3216,15.9574,16.1972,17.2603,16.7123,13.1868,16.4835,16.1644,13.4454,20,20.8219,])
array_2 = np.array([6520,5050,4100,3310,3190,3310,3300,3220,3210,3310,3250,2990,3110,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama"
array_2_name = "The number of executive administrative assistants in Alabama"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your dedication to rating warms my heart!


Correlation ID: 5798 · Black Variable ID: 20530 · Red Variable ID: 17786
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0