about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,777 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How nerdy Extra History YouTube video titles are and the second variable is Electricity generation in Nicaragua.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the power output surged, so did the nerdy historical puns. It’s as if the spark of knowledge just couldn't be contained, leading to a positively charged surge in nerdy creativity. The energy was simply un-Nica-raguan! Shocking, isn't it?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a bustling Nicaraguan power plant, where historical figures come to life from the electricity, whispering their tales as the generators hum. Surrounding them are YouTube video titles filled with creative nerdy puns about ancient empires and medieval warfare, flashing by as if powered by the surge of energy. The scene is positively charged with a blend of historical references and electric power, creating a shockingly nerdy and electrifying atmosphere. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How nerdy Extra History YouTube video titles are and Electricity generation in Nicaragua. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Brutalism Scalar art A TIME magazine cover image inspired by bauhaus Cutsy art illustration
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How nerdy Extra History YouTube video titles are and Electricity generation in Nicaragua, in the following situation: As the power output surged, so did the nerdy historical puns. It’s as if the spark of knowledge just couldn't be contained, leading to a positively charged surge in nerdy creativity. The energy was simply un-Nica-raguan! Shocking, isn't it?. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Nicaraguan power plant, historical figures come to life from the electricity, whispering their tales as the generators hum. Meanwhile, YouTube video titles flash by, filled with creative nerdy puns about ancient empires and medieval warfare, as if powered by the surge of energy. The scene is positively charged with a blend of historical references and electric power, creating a shockingly nerdy and electrifying atmosphere.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Nicaraguan power plant, historical figures come to life from the electricity, whispering their tales as the generators hum. Meanwhile, YouTube video titles flash by, filled with creative nerdy puns about ancient empires and medieval warfare, as if powered by the surge of energy. The scene is positively charged with a blend of historical references and electric power, creating a shockingly nerdy and electrifying atmosphere. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a bustling Nicaraguan power plant, where historical figures come to life from the electricity, whispering their tales as the generators hum. Surrounding them are YouTube video titles filled with creative nerdy puns about ancient empires and medieval warfare, flashing by as if powered by the surge of energy. The scene is positively charged with a blend of historical references and electric power, creating a shockingly nerdy and electrifying atmosphere.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in How nerdy Extra History YouTube video titles are caused Electricity generation in Nicaragua to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Quest for Watts in Nerdy Narratives: A Shocking Correlation Between Extra History YouTube Video Titles and Electricity Generation in Nicaragua

The Journal of Electrically Charged Narratives

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy Extra History YouTube video titles are and Electricity generation in Nicaragua. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9178060 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Quest for "Watts" in Nerdy Narratives: A Shocking Correlation Between Extra History YouTube Video Titles and Electricity Generation in Nicaragua

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unexpected connection between the nerdiness of Extra History YouTube video titles and the generation of electricity in Nicaragua. Utilizing sophisticated AI analysis of video titles and data from the Energy Information Administration, we set out to uncover whether there is a shocking relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9178060 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2021. This study not only brings a jolt of humor to the intersection of historical narratives and energy production, but also sheds light on the electrifying potential of nerdy content. Future research in this electrifying field could further illuminate the link between cultural expressions and real-world dynamics, sparking new dialogues and currents of thought.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy Extra History YouTube video titles are and Electricity generation in Nicaragua. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Quest for "Watts" in Nerdy Narratives: A Shocking Correlation Between Extra History YouTube Video Titles and Electricity Generation in Nicaragua

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unexpected connection between the nerdiness of Extra History YouTube video titles and the generation of electricity in Nicaragua. Utilizing sophisticated AI analysis of video titles and data from the Energy Information Administration, we set out to uncover whether there is a shocking relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9178060 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2021. This study not only brings a jolt of humor to the intersection of historical narratives and energy production, but also sheds light on the electrifying potential of nerdy content. Future research in this electrifying field could further illuminate the link between cultural expressions and real-world dynamics, sparking new dialogues and currents of thought.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between history buffs and electricity may not seem immediately apparent, but the world of academia is full of surprises. In this study, we embark on an electrifying journey to uncover the mysterious link between the nerdiness of Extra History YouTube video titles and the generation of electricity in Nicaragua. The sparks are sure to fly as we delve into these seemingly unrelated subjects with a shocking level of scrutiny.

The title of a YouTube video may appear to be merely an attention-grabbing phrase designed to lure unsuspecting viewers into a historical rabbit hole. Nevertheless, we cannot simply overlook the potential for uncharted connections between such titles and the generation of electric power. With this in mind, we employ state-of-the-art AI analysis to decode the underlying nerdiness of these video titles and pair this information with electricity generation data obtained from the Energy Information Administration.

As we delve into this research, it is essential to remember that humor and scholarly pursuits need not be mutually exclusive. We seek to inject a current of levity into the traditionally serious world of academic research, while maintaining a voltage of scholarly rigor and precision. Our quest is not just for "watts," but for a deeper understanding of the nuanced interplay between cultural expressions and real-world dynamics.

Join us as we navigate through the currents of historical enthusiasm and the oscillation of electricity production to shed light on the electrifying potential of nerdy content. Our findings are sure to illuminate the connection between seemingly disparate realms of human endeavor and spark new dialogues among scholars and enthusiasts alike. This study aims to break new ground in the exploration of unexpected correlations and to generate a buzz in the academic community.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy Extra History YouTube video titles are and Electricity generation in Nicaragua. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Quest for "Watts" in Nerdy Narratives: A Shocking Correlation Between Extra History YouTube Video Titles and Electricity Generation in Nicaragua

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unexpected connection between the nerdiness of Extra History YouTube video titles and the generation of electricity in Nicaragua. Utilizing sophisticated AI analysis of video titles and data from the Energy Information Administration, we set out to uncover whether there is a shocking relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9178060 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2021. This study not only brings a jolt of humor to the intersection of historical narratives and energy production, but also sheds light on the electrifying potential of nerdy content. Future research in this electrifying field could further illuminate the link between cultural expressions and real-world dynamics, sparking new dialogues and currents of thought.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between history buffs and electricity may not seem immediately apparent, but the world of academia is full of surprises. In this study, we embark on an electrifying journey to uncover the mysterious link between the nerdiness of Extra History YouTube video titles and the generation of electricity in Nicaragua. The sparks are sure to fly as we delve into these seemingly unrelated subjects with a shocking level of scrutiny.
The title of a YouTube video may appear to be merely an attention-grabbing phrase designed to lure unsuspecting viewers into a historical rabbit hole. Nevertheless, we cannot simply overlook the potential for uncharted connections between such titles and the generation of electric power. With this in mind, we employ state-of-the-art AI analysis to decode the underlying nerdiness of these video titles and pair this information with electricity generation data obtained from the Energy Information Administration.
As we delve into this research, it is essential to remember that humor and scholarly pursuits need not be mutually exclusive. We seek to inject a current of levity into the traditionally serious world of academic research, while maintaining a voltage of scholarly rigor and precision. Our quest is not just for "watts," but for a deeper understanding of the nuanced interplay between cultural expressions and real-world dynamics.
Join us as we navigate through the currents of historical enthusiasm and the oscillation of electricity production to shed light on the electrifying potential of nerdy content. Our findings are sure to illuminate the connection between seemingly disparate realms of human endeavor and spark new dialogues among scholars and enthusiasts alike. This study aims to break new ground in the exploration of unexpected correlations and to generate a buzz in the academic community.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The authors investigate the intriguing correlation between the nerdy nature of Extra History YouTube video titles and electricity generation in Nicaragua. While this may initially appear far-fetched, a thorough review of existing literature reveals unexpected parallels between seemingly unrelated phenomena.

Smith (2015) provides a comprehensive analysis of historical narratives and their impact on cultural expression, emphasizing the power of storytelling and its ability to shape collective identities. Doe and Jones (2018) further extend this discussion, delving into the influence of digital media on historical education and popular engagement with the past. As such, these studies lay the groundwork for exploring the potential connections between historical narratives, nerd culture, and real-world manifestations, forming the theoretical basis for the present investigation.

Turning to the realm of energy production, recent works such as "Energy Revolution: The Physics and the Promise of Efficient Technology" by Wang (2020) and "Power Struggle: The Untold Story of the Energy Crisis" by Garcia (2019) shed light on the complex dynamics of electricity generation and distribution. Wang (2020) provides insights into the physics behind power generation, while Garcia (2019) offers a compelling narrative of the challenges and triumphs in the energy sector. Understanding the intricacies of electricity generation is fundamental to contextualizing the potential impact of cultural elements on this process.

In a surprising turn, fictional literature also offers glimpses into themes that resonate with the current study. Works such as "The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test" by Tom Wolfe and "Spark Joy: An Illustrated Master Class on the Art of Organizing and Tidying Up" by Marie Kondo (2016) may not directly address our research topic, but their thematic elements – electricity and sparks – playfully intersect with the subject matter at hand.

Furthermore, informal insights from social media platforms cannot be disregarded. A tweet from @HistoryNerd_42 humorously quipped, "I'm so into history, I could generate electricity from my sheer nerdiness." While seemingly lighthearted, such comments may inadvertently hint at an underlying association between historical enthusiasm and electric energy – a notion worth exploring in the context of this research.

The literature review thus sets the stage for a lighthearted yet scholarly analysis of the unexpected relationship between nerd culture and electricity generation, paving the way for a charge of humor and insight to flow through the academic discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy Extra History YouTube video titles are and Electricity generation in Nicaragua. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Quest for "Watts" in Nerdy Narratives: A Shocking Correlation Between Extra History YouTube Video Titles and Electricity Generation in Nicaragua

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unexpected connection between the nerdiness of Extra History YouTube video titles and the generation of electricity in Nicaragua. Utilizing sophisticated AI analysis of video titles and data from the Energy Information Administration, we set out to uncover whether there is a shocking relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9178060 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2021. This study not only brings a jolt of humor to the intersection of historical narratives and energy production, but also sheds light on the electrifying potential of nerdy content. Future research in this electrifying field could further illuminate the link between cultural expressions and real-world dynamics, sparking new dialogues and currents of thought.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between history buffs and electricity may not seem immediately apparent, but the world of academia is full of surprises. In this study, we embark on an electrifying journey to uncover the mysterious link between the nerdiness of Extra History YouTube video titles and the generation of electricity in Nicaragua. The sparks are sure to fly as we delve into these seemingly unrelated subjects with a shocking level of scrutiny.
The title of a YouTube video may appear to be merely an attention-grabbing phrase designed to lure unsuspecting viewers into a historical rabbit hole. Nevertheless, we cannot simply overlook the potential for uncharted connections between such titles and the generation of electric power. With this in mind, we employ state-of-the-art AI analysis to decode the underlying nerdiness of these video titles and pair this information with electricity generation data obtained from the Energy Information Administration.
As we delve into this research, it is essential to remember that humor and scholarly pursuits need not be mutually exclusive. We seek to inject a current of levity into the traditionally serious world of academic research, while maintaining a voltage of scholarly rigor and precision. Our quest is not just for "watts," but for a deeper understanding of the nuanced interplay between cultural expressions and real-world dynamics.
Join us as we navigate through the currents of historical enthusiasm and the oscillation of electricity production to shed light on the electrifying potential of nerdy content. Our findings are sure to illuminate the connection between seemingly disparate realms of human endeavor and spark new dialogues among scholars and enthusiasts alike. This study aims to break new ground in the exploration of unexpected correlations and to generate a buzz in the academic community.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the electrifying relationship between Extra History YouTube video titles and electricity generation in Nicaragua, we employed a multifaceted approach that could rival the complexity of a Rube Goldberg machine. Firstly, we harnessed the power of advanced AI analysis to scrutinize the nerdiness quotient of the video titles. This involved the development of a custom algorithm, affectionately dubbed "Nerdometer 9000," designed to measure the density of historical, nerdy, and esoteric references within the titles with a precision that would even impress a time-traveling physicist.

The AI analysis delved deep into the YouTube video titles, meticulously parsing each syllable for clues to the video's level of nerdy content. It didn't just scratch the surface; it delved into the depths of historical minutiae, akin to an archeologist unearthing hidden artifacts in a forgotten tomb. The algorithm assigned a numerical nerdy score to each video title, a task that required computational prowess rivaling that of the finest Sudoku enthusiasts, and yet it approached its task with a stoic resolve that would make even the most serious historian crack a smile.

On the other hand, the data for electricity generation in Nicaragua was obtained from the Energy Information Administration, a treasure trove of information that holds the keys to understanding the power dynamics of nations. We gathered data spanning from 2012 to 2021, ensuring a comprehensive temporal scope that could capture the ebb and flow of electricity generation, and maybe even a few lightning strikes of inspiration.

The next step involved the improbable pairing of the nerdy scores of the video titles with the electricity generation data. It was as if we were attempting to synthesize the secrets of the universe by combining the force of historical curiosity with the raw power of electric current in a scientific fusion dance. The resulting dataset resembled a curious hybrid, akin to a phoenix rising from the ashes of conventional research methodologies, and yet it held the tantalizing promise of unveiling a hidden pattern as unexpected as a cameo appearance by a time-traveling genius.

After fusing these seemingly disparate datasets, we subjected them to rigorous statistical analysis, employing multivariate regression models and hypothesis testing that could make a statistician's heart skip a beat with excitement. The results were electrifying, revealing a correlation coefficient that stood as tall and proud as a Tesla coil in the night, accompanied by a p-value that proved more significant than the discovery of a long-lost historical artifact.

In summary, our methodology was more than mere method; it was an intricate dance between AI analysis, historical enthusiasm, and statistical rigor, performed on the grand stage of academic research. With a nod to the unconventional and a wink to the unexpected, we navigated these uncharted currents to shed light on the electrifying potential of nerdy content, illuminating a connection that may spark new dialogues and currents of thought in the scholarly community.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy Extra History YouTube video titles are and Electricity generation in Nicaragua. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9178060, r-squared of 0.8423679, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Quest for "Watts" in Nerdy Narratives: A Shocking Correlation Between Extra History YouTube Video Titles and Electricity Generation in Nicaragua

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unexpected connection between the nerdiness of Extra History YouTube video titles and the generation of electricity in Nicaragua. Utilizing sophisticated AI analysis of video titles and data from the Energy Information Administration, we set out to uncover whether there is a shocking relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9178060 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2021. This study not only brings a jolt of humor to the intersection of historical narratives and energy production, but also sheds light on the electrifying potential of nerdy content. Future research in this electrifying field could further illuminate the link between cultural expressions and real-world dynamics, sparking new dialogues and currents of thought.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between history buffs and electricity may not seem immediately apparent, but the world of academia is full of surprises. In this study, we embark on an electrifying journey to uncover the mysterious link between the nerdiness of Extra History YouTube video titles and the generation of electricity in Nicaragua. The sparks are sure to fly as we delve into these seemingly unrelated subjects with a shocking level of scrutiny.
The title of a YouTube video may appear to be merely an attention-grabbing phrase designed to lure unsuspecting viewers into a historical rabbit hole. Nevertheless, we cannot simply overlook the potential for uncharted connections between such titles and the generation of electric power. With this in mind, we employ state-of-the-art AI analysis to decode the underlying nerdiness of these video titles and pair this information with electricity generation data obtained from the Energy Information Administration.
As we delve into this research, it is essential to remember that humor and scholarly pursuits need not be mutually exclusive. We seek to inject a current of levity into the traditionally serious world of academic research, while maintaining a voltage of scholarly rigor and precision. Our quest is not just for "watts," but for a deeper understanding of the nuanced interplay between cultural expressions and real-world dynamics.
Join us as we navigate through the currents of historical enthusiasm and the oscillation of electricity production to shed light on the electrifying potential of nerdy content. Our findings are sure to illuminate the connection between seemingly disparate realms of human endeavor and spark new dialogues among scholars and enthusiasts alike. This study aims to break new ground in the exploration of unexpected correlations and to generate a buzz in the academic community.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a remarkable correlation between the nerdy nature of Extra History YouTube video titles and the electricity generation in Nicaragua. The correlation coefficient of 0.9178060 indicates a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. This correlation is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8423679, signifying that approximately 84.24% of the variation in electricity generation in Nicaragua can be explained by the nerdy Extra History video titles. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship, indicating a statistically significant association.

As illustrated in Fig. 1, the scatterplot displays a clear and impressive pattern, demonstrating the strong positive correlation between the nerdy Extra History video titles and electricity generation in Nicaragua. The trend line in the scatterplot further emphasizes the striking relationship, which captivates the imagination with its unexpected fusion of historical narratives and electric power generation.

These findings challenge the notion that historical narratives and energy production exist in separate spheres, suggesting that there may be underlying forces at play which are yet to be fully understood. One might even say that this correlation "shocks" the traditional expectations of scholarly inquiry, highlighting the electrifying potential of merging seemingly incongruous realms of study.

The implications of these results extend beyond the realm of statistical analyses, offering a jolt of insight into the potential interplay between cultural expressions and real-world dynamics. The electrifying potential of nerdy content, as evidenced by this research, underscores the need for further exploration of this captivating relationship. These findings not only illuminate the unexpected currents of connection between historical narratives and electricity generation but also underscore the transformative power of interdisciplinary inquiry. Our discoveries are sure to spark new dialogues and ignite fresh perspectives within the scholarly community, fostering a more dynamic understanding of the interwoven tapestry of human endeavors.

In summary, this study unravels an electrifying relationship between the nerdy nature of Extra History YouTube video titles and electricity generation in Nicaragua, shedding light on the potential synergy between historical narratives and real-world energy dynamics. This groundbreaking investigation not only shocks the conventional boundaries of research but also sparks a new wave of curiosity in exploring unexpected correlations in the academic landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy Extra History YouTube video titles are and Electricity generation in Nicaragua. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Quest for "Watts" in Nerdy Narratives: A Shocking Correlation Between Extra History YouTube Video Titles and Electricity Generation in Nicaragua

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unexpected connection between the nerdiness of Extra History YouTube video titles and the generation of electricity in Nicaragua. Utilizing sophisticated AI analysis of video titles and data from the Energy Information Administration, we set out to uncover whether there is a shocking relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9178060 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2021. This study not only brings a jolt of humor to the intersection of historical narratives and energy production, but also sheds light on the electrifying potential of nerdy content. Future research in this electrifying field could further illuminate the link between cultural expressions and real-world dynamics, sparking new dialogues and currents of thought.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The authors investigate the intriguing correlation between the nerdy nature of Extra History YouTube video titles and electricity generation in Nicaragua. While this may initially appear far-fetched, a thorough review of existing literature reveals unexpected parallels between seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Smith (2015) provides a comprehensive analysis of historical narratives and their impact on cultural expression, emphasizing the power of storytelling and its ability to shape collective identities. Doe and Jones (2018) further extend this discussion, delving into the influence of digital media on historical education and popular engagement with the past. As such, these studies lay the groundwork for exploring the potential connections between historical narratives, nerd culture, and real-world manifestations, forming the theoretical basis for the present investigation.
Turning to the realm of energy production, recent works such as "Energy Revolution: The Physics and the Promise of Efficient Technology" by Wang (2020) and "Power Struggle: The Untold Story of the Energy Crisis" by Garcia (2019) shed light on the complex dynamics of electricity generation and distribution. Wang (2020) provides insights into the physics behind power generation, while Garcia (2019) offers a compelling narrative of the challenges and triumphs in the energy sector. Understanding the intricacies of electricity generation is fundamental to contextualizing the potential impact of cultural elements on this process.
In a surprising turn, fictional literature also offers glimpses into themes that resonate with the current study. Works such as "The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test" by Tom Wolfe and "Spark Joy: An Illustrated Master Class on the Art of Organizing and Tidying Up" by Marie Kondo (2016) may not directly address our research topic, but their thematic elements – electricity and sparks – playfully intersect with the subject matter at hand.
Furthermore, informal insights from social media platforms cannot be disregarded. A tweet from @HistoryNerd_42 humorously quipped, "I'm so into history, I could generate electricity from my sheer nerdiness." While seemingly lighthearted, such comments may inadvertently hint at an underlying association between historical enthusiasm and electric energy – a notion worth exploring in the context of this research.
The literature review thus sets the stage for a lighthearted yet scholarly analysis of the unexpected relationship between nerd culture and electricity generation, paving the way for a charge of humor and insight to flow through the academic discourse.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a remarkable correlation between the nerdy nature of Extra History YouTube video titles and the electricity generation in Nicaragua. The correlation coefficient of 0.9178060 indicates a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. This correlation is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8423679, signifying that approximately 84.24% of the variation in electricity generation in Nicaragua can be explained by the nerdy Extra History video titles. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship, indicating a statistically significant association.
As illustrated in Fig. 1, the scatterplot displays a clear and impressive pattern, demonstrating the strong positive correlation between the nerdy Extra History video titles and electricity generation in Nicaragua. The trend line in the scatterplot further emphasizes the striking relationship, which captivates the imagination with its unexpected fusion of historical narratives and electric power generation.
These findings challenge the notion that historical narratives and energy production exist in separate spheres, suggesting that there may be underlying forces at play which are yet to be fully understood. One might even say that this correlation "shocks" the traditional expectations of scholarly inquiry, highlighting the electrifying potential of merging seemingly incongruous realms of study.
The implications of these results extend beyond the realm of statistical analyses, offering a jolt of insight into the potential interplay between cultural expressions and real-world dynamics. The electrifying potential of nerdy content, as evidenced by this research, underscores the need for further exploration of this captivating relationship. These findings not only illuminate the unexpected currents of connection between historical narratives and electricity generation but also underscore the transformative power of interdisciplinary inquiry. Our discoveries are sure to spark new dialogues and ignite fresh perspectives within the scholarly community, fostering a more dynamic understanding of the interwoven tapestry of human endeavors.
In summary, this study unravels an electrifying relationship between the nerdy nature of Extra History YouTube video titles and electricity generation in Nicaragua, shedding light on the potential synergy between historical narratives and real-world energy dynamics. This groundbreaking investigation not only shocks the conventional boundaries of research but also sparks a new wave of curiosity in exploring unexpected correlations in the academic landscape.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our investigation has unearthed an electrifying correlation between the nerdy nature of Extra History YouTube video titles and electricity generation in Nicaragua, solidifying the unexpected union of nerd culture and energy dynamics. It's as if historical narratives and electric power generation have shockingly come together like two positively charged ions, defying conventional academic expectations and jolting the scholarly community with their unforeseen interplay.

Building on the foundations laid by Smith (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018), our findings provide empirical support for the notion that historical narratives, particularly when infused with unapologetic nerdiness, may hold the power to influence real-world phenomena. By delving into the thematic elements of electricity and sparks in literary works, we playfully aligned with the underlying themes resonating with our research, further demonstrating the potential for unexpected connections between seemingly disparate subjects.

Our results not only affirm the "spark" of insight offered by previous scholars but also add a fresh jolt of discovery to the academic landscape. The significant positive correlation coefficient, robust r-squared value, and compelling scatterplot pattern all converge to exhibit a captivating relationship between the nerdiness of Extra History video titles and electricity generation in Nicaragua. In essence, this correlation "amped up" our understanding of the potential synergies between cultural expressions and real-world dynamics.

By leveraging AI analysis of video titles and sophisticated statistical methods, we have shed light on the electrifying potential of nerdy content – a potential that has been harnessed to illuminate the seemingly unrelated realms of historical narratives and energy production. The humorous yet scholarly undertones from @HistoryNerd_42's tweet have manifested as a compelling avenue for scholarly exploration, offering a chuckle-inducing yet thought-provoking perspective on the underlying association between historical enthusiasm and electric energy.

Our findings not only debunk the notion of separate spheres for historical narratives and energy production but also underscore the transformative power of interdisciplinary inquiry – a "shock" to traditional scholarly expectations that sparks new dialogues and brings forth fresh perspectives. Truly, this research has sparked a new current of curiosity within the academic community, leaving us charged with enthusiasm for further explorations of these unexpected correlations.

In essence, our study contributes to the scholarly discourse by illuminating the hitherto untapped potential for synergy between seemingly incongruous realms of study, adding a touch of humor and sparking renewed interest in exploring unexpected connections within the academic landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How nerdy Extra History YouTube video titles are and Electricity generation in Nicaragua. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Quest for "Watts" in Nerdy Narratives: A Shocking Correlation Between Extra History YouTube Video Titles and Electricity Generation in Nicaragua

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unexpected connection between the nerdiness of Extra History YouTube video titles and the generation of electricity in Nicaragua. Utilizing sophisticated AI analysis of video titles and data from the Energy Information Administration, we set out to uncover whether there is a shocking relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9178060 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2021. This study not only brings a jolt of humor to the intersection of historical narratives and energy production, but also sheds light on the electrifying potential of nerdy content. Future research in this electrifying field could further illuminate the link between cultural expressions and real-world dynamics, sparking new dialogues and currents of thought.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between history buffs and electricity may not seem immediately apparent, but the world of academia is full of surprises. In this study, we embark on an electrifying journey to uncover the mysterious link between the nerdiness of Extra History YouTube video titles and the generation of electricity in Nicaragua. The sparks are sure to fly as we delve into these seemingly unrelated subjects with a shocking level of scrutiny.
The title of a YouTube video may appear to be merely an attention-grabbing phrase designed to lure unsuspecting viewers into a historical rabbit hole. Nevertheless, we cannot simply overlook the potential for uncharted connections between such titles and the generation of electric power. With this in mind, we employ state-of-the-art AI analysis to decode the underlying nerdiness of these video titles and pair this information with electricity generation data obtained from the Energy Information Administration.
As we delve into this research, it is essential to remember that humor and scholarly pursuits need not be mutually exclusive. We seek to inject a current of levity into the traditionally serious world of academic research, while maintaining a voltage of scholarly rigor and precision. Our quest is not just for "watts," but for a deeper understanding of the nuanced interplay between cultural expressions and real-world dynamics.
Join us as we navigate through the currents of historical enthusiasm and the oscillation of electricity production to shed light on the electrifying potential of nerdy content. Our findings are sure to illuminate the connection between seemingly disparate realms of human endeavor and spark new dialogues among scholars and enthusiasts alike. This study aims to break new ground in the exploration of unexpected correlations and to generate a buzz in the academic community.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a remarkable correlation between the nerdy nature of Extra History YouTube video titles and the electricity generation in Nicaragua. The correlation coefficient of 0.9178060 indicates a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. This correlation is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8423679, signifying that approximately 84.24% of the variation in electricity generation in Nicaragua can be explained by the nerdy Extra History video titles. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship, indicating a statistically significant association.
As illustrated in Fig. 1, the scatterplot displays a clear and impressive pattern, demonstrating the strong positive correlation between the nerdy Extra History video titles and electricity generation in Nicaragua. The trend line in the scatterplot further emphasizes the striking relationship, which captivates the imagination with its unexpected fusion of historical narratives and electric power generation.
These findings challenge the notion that historical narratives and energy production exist in separate spheres, suggesting that there may be underlying forces at play which are yet to be fully understood. One might even say that this correlation "shocks" the traditional expectations of scholarly inquiry, highlighting the electrifying potential of merging seemingly incongruous realms of study.
The implications of these results extend beyond the realm of statistical analyses, offering a jolt of insight into the potential interplay between cultural expressions and real-world dynamics. The electrifying potential of nerdy content, as evidenced by this research, underscores the need for further exploration of this captivating relationship. These findings not only illuminate the unexpected currents of connection between historical narratives and electricity generation but also underscore the transformative power of interdisciplinary inquiry. Our discoveries are sure to spark new dialogues and ignite fresh perspectives within the scholarly community, fostering a more dynamic understanding of the interwoven tapestry of human endeavors.
In summary, this study unravels an electrifying relationship between the nerdy nature of Extra History YouTube video titles and electricity generation in Nicaragua, shedding light on the potential synergy between historical narratives and real-world energy dynamics. This groundbreaking investigation not only shocks the conventional boundaries of research but also sparks a new wave of curiosity in exploring unexpected correlations in the academic landscape.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has uncovered a startling correlation between the seemingly nerdy Extra History YouTube video titles and the generation of electricity in Nicaragua. The striking relationship between historical enthusiasm and electrical power generation has certainly provided a jolt of insight into the potential interplay between cultural expressions and real-world dynamics. It appears that the nerdy nature of video titles possesses an electrifying potential, serving as a conduit for sparking new dialogues and igniting fresh perspectives within the scholarly community.

The unexpected fusion of historical narratives and electric power generation challenges traditional expectations of scholarly inquiry, and one might even say that the correlation "shocks" the academic community with its illuminating findings. However, while our study has shone a light on this previously unexplored relationship, we must resist the temptation to get too amped up about it. After all, it's important to maintain a balanced perspective and not get too "charged" with enthusiasm for correlations that may simply be the result of statistical coincidence.

As such, we assert that further research in this electrifying field may not be necessary at this time. The unexpected synergies between seemingly incongruous realms of study have certainly provided a "powerful" spark for wider discussions on interdisciplinary inquiry, but for now, we should be content with the "electrifying" insights our study has generated.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Quest for Watts in Nerdy Narratives: A Shocking Correlation Between Extra History YouTube Video Titles and Electricity Generation in Nicaragua. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Electrically Charged Narratives


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Quest for Watts in Nerdy Narratives: A Shocking Correlation Between Extra History YouTube Video Titles and Electricity Generation in Nicaragua. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Silly Scientific Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Quest for Watts in Nerdy Narratives: A Shocking Correlation Between Extra History YouTube Video Titles and Electricity Generation in Nicaragua with an abstract of In this paper, we explore the unexpected connection between the nerdiness of Extra History YouTube video titles and the generation of electricity in Nicaragua. Utilizing sophisticated AI analysis of video titles and data from the Energy Information Administration, we set out to uncover whether there is a shocking relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9178060 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2021. This study not only brings a jolt of humor to the intersection of historical narratives and energy production, but also sheds light on the electrifying potential of nerdy content. Future research in this electrifying field could further illuminate the link between cultural expressions and real-world dynamics, sparking new dialogues and currents of thought.

ChatGPT:

Extra History, YouTube video titles, electricity generation, Nicaragua, correlation, AI analysis, Energy Information Administration, correlation coefficient, p-value, historical narratives, energy production, nerdy content, cultural expressions, real-world dynamics.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How nerdy Extra History YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How nerdy Extra History YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How nerdy Extra History YouTube video titles are

Electricity generation in Nicaragua
Detailed data title: Total electricity generation in Nicaragua in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Electricity generation in Nicaragua

Correlation r = 0.9178060 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8423679 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Electricity generation in Nicaragua) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How nerdy Extra History YouTube video titles are) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.000181. 0.0001806530600635196300000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 0.0181% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 5,535 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.68, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
How nerdy Extra History YouTube video titles are (Nerdiness score)4.3744.59265.14295.16185.1255.00825.60985.02174.93015.5271
Electricity generation in Nicaragua (Billion kWh)3.89474.040584.353954.441064.478464.399394.540874.463614.417374.62416




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.374,4.5926,5.1429,5.1618,5.125,5.0082,5.6098,5.0217,4.9301,5.5271,])
array_2 = np.array([3.8947,4.04058,4.35395,4.44106,4.47846,4.39939,4.54087,4.46361,4.41737,4.62416,])
array_1_name = "How nerdy Extra History YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Electricity generation in Nicaragua"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 5777 · Black Variable ID: 25781 · Red Variable ID: 23861
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0