about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,774 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How clickbait-y Vihart's YouTube video titles are and the second variable is The number of jewelers in Florida.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the glittering charm of Florida's jewelers waned, Vihart found herself unable to craft as many pun-ny, gem-related video titles, ultimately leading to a decrease in clickbait-y content. After all, it's hard to sparkle in the YouTube algorithm without a touch of jeweled inspiration!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: "Generate an image of a futuristic jewelry store in Florida with empty display cases, as Vihart sits at her computer, struggling to come up with clickbait-y YouTube video titles in the absence of sparkling gems. The scene should capture the vibrant, sunny atmosphere of the Florida location, juxtaposed with the desolate store and Vihart's creative struggle." The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How clickbait-y Vihart's YouTube video titles are and The number of jewelers in Florida. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Surrealism Futuristic Pop art Surrealism
ChatGPT: Futuristic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How clickbait-y Vihart's YouTube video titles are and The number of jewelers in Florida, in the following situation: As the glittering charm of Florida's jewelers waned, Vihart found herself unable to craft as many pun-ny, gem-related video titles, ultimately leading to a decrease in clickbait-y content. After all, it's hard to sparkle in the YouTube algorithm without a touch of jeweled inspiration!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bright and sunny Florida jewelry store, the display cases filled with sparkling gems and shiny baubles stand mostly empty, signifying the decreasing number of jewelers in the state. Meanwhile, Vihart sits at her computer, struggling to come up with clickbait-y YouTube video titles without the inspiration of the dazzling jewelry around her. The lack of gem-related content leads to a decrease in her usual clickbait-y charm, as she searches for that sparkly inspiration she once had.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Futuristic ] and depicting this scene: In a bright and sunny Florida jewelry store, the display cases filled with sparkling gems and shiny baubles stand mostly empty, signifying the decreasing number of jewelers in the state. Meanwhile, Vihart sits at her computer, struggling to come up with clickbait-y YouTube video titles without the inspiration of the dazzling jewelry around her. The lack of gem-related content leads to a decrease in her usual clickbait-y charm, as she searches for that sparkly inspiration she once had. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: "Generate an image of a futuristic jewelry store in Florida with empty display cases, as Vihart sits at her computer, struggling to come up with clickbait-y YouTube video titles in the absence of sparkling gems. The scene should capture the vibrant, sunny atmosphere of the Florida location, juxtaposed with the desolate store and Vihart's creative struggle."

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in How clickbait-y Vihart YouTube video titles are caused The number of jewelers in Florida to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Click-baiting for Diamonds: A Sparkling Investigation into the Relationship Between Vihart Video Titles and the Number of Jewelers in Florida

The Journal of Social Media and Gemology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Vihart YouTube video titles are and The number of jewelers in Florida. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8581676 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Click-baiting for Diamonds: A Sparkling Investigation into the Relationship Between Vihart Video Titles and the Number of Jewelers in Florida"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a holistic examination of the enthralling link between the clickbait nature of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of jewelers in the Sunshine State. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have rigorously scrutinized this seemingly peculiar connection. Our study, spanning from 2009 to 2022, has yielded a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8581676 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a compelling relationship that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance.

Honing in on the curious correlation, we have unearthed a wealth of fascinating insights and findings, shedding light on the influence of enticing video titles on consumer behavior and the jewelry industry's local dynamics. Our analysis not only underscores the tangible impact of clickbait-y video titles on the entrepreneurial landscape but also dabbles in the realm of dad jokes to bring levity to this captivating interplay. After all, a study on Vihart video titles and jewelers in Florida wouldn't be complete without a "cutting-edge" joke or a "facet"-ious pun! So, join us as we delve into this gem of a topic, where statistical correlations meet the sparkle of YouTube clickbait, providing both empirical evidence and a touch of lighthearted humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Vihart YouTube video titles are and The number of jewelers in Florida. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Click-baiting for Diamonds: A Sparkling Investigation into the Relationship Between Vihart Video Titles and the Number of Jewelers in Florida"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a holistic examination of the enthralling link between the clickbait nature of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of jewelers in the Sunshine State. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have rigorously scrutinized this seemingly peculiar connection. Our study, spanning from 2009 to 2022, has yielded a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8581676 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a compelling relationship that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance.

Honing in on the curious correlation, we have unearthed a wealth of fascinating insights and findings, shedding light on the influence of enticing video titles on consumer behavior and the jewelry industry's local dynamics. Our analysis not only underscores the tangible impact of clickbait-y video titles on the entrepreneurial landscape but also dabbles in the realm of dad jokes to bring levity to this captivating interplay. After all, a study on Vihart video titles and jewelers in Florida wouldn't be complete without a "cutting-edge" joke or a "facet"-ious pun! So, join us as we delve into this gem of a topic, where statistical correlations meet the sparkle of YouTube clickbait, providing both empirical evidence and a touch of lighthearted humor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

As the old saying goes, "Diamonds are a girl's best friend" – but what about viral video titles? In this paper, we embark on a sparkling journey to examine the intriguing relationship between the clickbait nature of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of jewelers in the state of Florida. While this may sound like an unexpected pairing, we assure you that our investigation is more than just a "faceted" attempt at humor.

Now, before we "dive" headfirst into our analysis, picture this: a statistician walks into a jewelry store and asks to calculate the carat weight of their data. The jeweler scoffs and says, "You'll have to be more specific – we deal in gems, not statistics!" Though the pun may be "uncut," it emphasizes the often unforeseen intersections between statistical analysis and industries that are traditionally viewed through a different lens.

Intriguingly, the allure of clickbait has extended its reach beyond the online realm, and notably, into the physical markets that adorn the fingers, necks, and ears of the populace. Our study seeks to provide a rigorous examination of this peculiar relationship, shedding light on the potential influence of captivating video titles on consumer behavior and local business landscapes. After all, who would have thought that a click-worthy title could wield such influence over the sparkle of diamonds and the gleam of economic activity?

As we embark on this investigation, it's important to note that humor and statistical analysis are not often deemed synonymous bedfellows. However, our intention is not to simply "polish" this correlation for its comedic potential, but rather to showcase the unexpected ways in which statistical investigations can illuminate captivating connections in the world around us.

Speaking of surprising connections, did you hear about the statistician who became a jeweler? She found that making statistical inferences and crafting intricate jewelry were more similar than she expected – after all, they both involved a keen eye for detail and a propensity for carefully "setting" stones in place. We hope to mirror this notion as we delve into the intricate interplay between YouTube clickbait and the jewelry industry, aiming to uncover empirical evidence with a touch of whimsy.

So, join us as we embark on this "facet"-inating journey, where empirical correlations and lighthearted humor converge to reveal the unexpected sparkle of statistical analysis in a world filled with intriguing, yet often overlooked, relationships.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Vihart YouTube video titles are and The number of jewelers in Florida. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Click-baiting for Diamonds: A Sparkling Investigation into the Relationship Between Vihart Video Titles and the Number of Jewelers in Florida"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a holistic examination of the enthralling link between the clickbait nature of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of jewelers in the Sunshine State. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have rigorously scrutinized this seemingly peculiar connection. Our study, spanning from 2009 to 2022, has yielded a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8581676 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a compelling relationship that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance.

Honing in on the curious correlation, we have unearthed a wealth of fascinating insights and findings, shedding light on the influence of enticing video titles on consumer behavior and the jewelry industry's local dynamics. Our analysis not only underscores the tangible impact of clickbait-y video titles on the entrepreneurial landscape but also dabbles in the realm of dad jokes to bring levity to this captivating interplay. After all, a study on Vihart video titles and jewelers in Florida wouldn't be complete without a "cutting-edge" joke or a "facet"-ious pun! So, join us as we delve into this gem of a topic, where statistical correlations meet the sparkle of YouTube clickbait, providing both empirical evidence and a touch of lighthearted humor.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
As the old saying goes, "Diamonds are a girl's best friend" – but what about viral video titles? In this paper, we embark on a sparkling journey to examine the intriguing relationship between the clickbait nature of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of jewelers in the state of Florida. While this may sound like an unexpected pairing, we assure you that our investigation is more than just a "faceted" attempt at humor.
Now, before we "dive" headfirst into our analysis, picture this: a statistician walks into a jewelry store and asks to calculate the carat weight of their data. The jeweler scoffs and says, "You'll have to be more specific – we deal in gems, not statistics!" Though the pun may be "uncut," it emphasizes the often unforeseen intersections between statistical analysis and industries that are traditionally viewed through a different lens.
Intriguingly, the allure of clickbait has extended its reach beyond the online realm, and notably, into the physical markets that adorn the fingers, necks, and ears of the populace. Our study seeks to provide a rigorous examination of this peculiar relationship, shedding light on the potential influence of captivating video titles on consumer behavior and local business landscapes. After all, who would have thought that a click-worthy title could wield such influence over the sparkle of diamonds and the gleam of economic activity?
As we embark on this investigation, it's important to note that humor and statistical analysis are not often deemed synonymous bedfellows. However, our intention is not to simply "polish" this correlation for its comedic potential, but rather to showcase the unexpected ways in which statistical investigations can illuminate captivating connections in the world around us.
Speaking of surprising connections, did you hear about the statistician who became a jeweler? She found that making statistical inferences and crafting intricate jewelry were more similar than she expected – after all, they both involved a keen eye for detail and a propensity for carefully "setting" stones in place. We hope to mirror this notion as we delve into the intricate interplay between YouTube clickbait and the jewelry industry, aiming to uncover empirical evidence with a touch of whimsy.
So, join us as we embark on this "facet"-inating journey, where empirical correlations and lighthearted humor converge to reveal the unexpected sparkle of statistical analysis in a world filled with intriguing, yet often overlooked, relationships.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In a seminal study by Smith et al., the authors find a noteworthy correlation between the clickbait nature of YouTube video titles and consumer engagement. Building upon this foundation, Doe and Jones delve into the realm of consumer behavior, uncovering the intricate ways in which attention-grabbing titles can influence viewers' choices. These studies underscore the pervasive influence of clickbait content in shaping consumer preferences and highlight the potential ramifications for various industries.

Now, turning to the captivating world of jewelers in Florida, it is essential to consider the seminal works of "Diamonds: The Antoinette Matlins Buying Guide" and "The Jewelry Maker's Design Book: An Alchemy of Objects," both of which provide invaluable insights into the complexities of the jewelry market. As these texts meticulously detail the art and science of jewelry making and purchasing, we are reminded that our investigation into clickbait-y Vihart video titles and the presence of jewelers in Florida seamlessly intertwines with this rich tapestry of industry dynamics and consumer behavior.

On a lighter note, we cannot overlook the entertaining yet captivating allure of fictional works such as "The Diamond as Big as the Ritz" and "The Moonstone," which, despite their narrative context, offer intriguing parallels to our study. These literary gems, with their intricate plots and immersive storytelling, serve as a poignant reminder of the enduring fascination with precious stones and the industries built around them. As we navigate the labyrinth of Vihart video titles and the world of jewelers, these literary references add a touch of whimsy to our exploration, much like a cleverly crafted pun in a statistical analysis.

Speaking of clever puns, a recent social media post cleverly quipped, "Is Florida the Sunshine State or the Sparkle State? With all these jewelers, it's hard to tell!" The comedic undertone of this post belies a thought-provoking observation about the prevalence of jewelers in Florida, and by extension, the potential impact of Vihart video titles on the local market. This lighthearted remark serves as a reminder that statistical investigations can be as illuminating as they are entertaining, much like a well-timed dad joke at a scientific conference.

As we traverse the realm of empirical research, literary allusions, and social media musings, our study seeks to intertwine rigorous analysis with a touch of levity, echoing the multifaceted nature of our investigation. In this convergence of statistical correlations, literary inspirations, and social commentary, we aim to unveil the unexpected sparkle of Vihart video titles and the colorful landscape of the jewelry industry, all while maintaining a "facet"-ious spirit of inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Vihart YouTube video titles are and The number of jewelers in Florida. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2009 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Click-baiting for Diamonds: A Sparkling Investigation into the Relationship Between Vihart Video Titles and the Number of Jewelers in Florida"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a holistic examination of the enthralling link between the clickbait nature of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of jewelers in the Sunshine State. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have rigorously scrutinized this seemingly peculiar connection. Our study, spanning from 2009 to 2022, has yielded a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8581676 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a compelling relationship that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance.

Honing in on the curious correlation, we have unearthed a wealth of fascinating insights and findings, shedding light on the influence of enticing video titles on consumer behavior and the jewelry industry's local dynamics. Our analysis not only underscores the tangible impact of clickbait-y video titles on the entrepreneurial landscape but also dabbles in the realm of dad jokes to bring levity to this captivating interplay. After all, a study on Vihart video titles and jewelers in Florida wouldn't be complete without a "cutting-edge" joke or a "facet"-ious pun! So, join us as we delve into this gem of a topic, where statistical correlations meet the sparkle of YouTube clickbait, providing both empirical evidence and a touch of lighthearted humor.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
As the old saying goes, "Diamonds are a girl's best friend" – but what about viral video titles? In this paper, we embark on a sparkling journey to examine the intriguing relationship between the clickbait nature of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of jewelers in the state of Florida. While this may sound like an unexpected pairing, we assure you that our investigation is more than just a "faceted" attempt at humor.
Now, before we "dive" headfirst into our analysis, picture this: a statistician walks into a jewelry store and asks to calculate the carat weight of their data. The jeweler scoffs and says, "You'll have to be more specific – we deal in gems, not statistics!" Though the pun may be "uncut," it emphasizes the often unforeseen intersections between statistical analysis and industries that are traditionally viewed through a different lens.
Intriguingly, the allure of clickbait has extended its reach beyond the online realm, and notably, into the physical markets that adorn the fingers, necks, and ears of the populace. Our study seeks to provide a rigorous examination of this peculiar relationship, shedding light on the potential influence of captivating video titles on consumer behavior and local business landscapes. After all, who would have thought that a click-worthy title could wield such influence over the sparkle of diamonds and the gleam of economic activity?
As we embark on this investigation, it's important to note that humor and statistical analysis are not often deemed synonymous bedfellows. However, our intention is not to simply "polish" this correlation for its comedic potential, but rather to showcase the unexpected ways in which statistical investigations can illuminate captivating connections in the world around us.
Speaking of surprising connections, did you hear about the statistician who became a jeweler? She found that making statistical inferences and crafting intricate jewelry were more similar than she expected – after all, they both involved a keen eye for detail and a propensity for carefully "setting" stones in place. We hope to mirror this notion as we delve into the intricate interplay between YouTube clickbait and the jewelry industry, aiming to uncover empirical evidence with a touch of whimsy.
So, join us as we embark on this "facet"-inating journey, where empirical correlations and lighthearted humor converge to reveal the unexpected sparkle of statistical analysis in a world filled with intriguing, yet often overlooked, relationships.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

In order to rigorously unravel the captivating connection between the clickbait nature of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of jewelers in Florida, our research team employed a multifaceted approach that combined advanced AI analysis and meticulous data mining techniques. Our data compilation began with the AI-powered extraction and scrutiny of YouTube video titles published by Vihart from the years 2009 to 2022. Each video title underwent a comprehensive examination to determine its clickbait level, which was quantified using a proprietary clickbait index formulated by our research team. This index included metrics such as sensationalism, curiosity gaps, and emotional triggers, synthesizing them into a quantifiable measure of clickbaitiness. This process, as rigorous and captivating as it was, prompted one researcher to quip, "We're not just mining data – we're also mining for click-worthy gems!"

After establishing the clickbait levels of the Vihart YouTube video titles, we delved into the realm of jeweler data within the state of Florida. Leveraging information from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our team meticulously extracted and contextualized the number of jewelry establishments, employment figures, and trends within the industry from 2009 to 2022. The statistical analysis spanned not only the metropolitan areas but also the more remote locales – after all, every facet of Florida’s jewelry landscape deserved to be scrutinized.

At the heart of our methodology lay a pun-loving algorithm – we affectionately named it "PUN-dit." This algorithm, infused with a keen wit and a love for dad jokes, sifted through the data to identify subtle correlations between the clickbait level of Vihart video titles and the ebb and flow of jewelers in Florida. "PUN-dit" certainly leant a humorous spark to our analysis, infusing a touch of whimsy into the data-driven exploration. One member of the research team even remarked, "PUN-dit is the facet of our data that keeps us laughing, even when the statistics get a bit too "rocky"!"

Furthermore, our approach honed in on geospatial analysis to discern any localized patterns within Florida. We utilized geographic information systems (GIS) to map out the distribution of jewelers alongside the "destination points" of Vihart video titles – after all, it's not every day that statistical analysis leads to cartographic adventures in the Sunshine State! The juxtaposition of these spatial data sets allowed us to visualize and examine any potential clustering or dispersion dynamics between clickbait-rich video titles and jewelry establishments.

In light of the unconventional nature of our research subject, we embraced a holistic scope that extended beyond traditional statistical methods. Our methodology also embraced sentiment analysis, exploring the emotional undercurrents and themes within Vihart's video titles. We utilized natural language processing algorithms to detect emotive patterns and thematic content, seeking to unveil any emotive resonance that might underpin the relationship between captivating titles and the jewelry industry. This sentiment analysis, while adding an unexpected twist to our methodology, provided a nuanced understanding and "carat-lyzed" a deeper exploration of the connection at hand.

Throughout our methodology, we were guided by the belief that statistical investigations need not be devoid of wit and humor. Each step of the process was underpinned by a lighthearted spirit, adding a touch of levity and introspective mirth to this otherwise serious pursuit of empirical evidence. Our team of researchers, in the spirit of statistical curiosity and good-humored banter, aimed to imbue this methodology with a sparkle and wit, akin to finding an unexpected gem in the rough.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Vihart YouTube video titles are and The number of jewelers in Florida. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2009 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8581676, r-squared of 0.7364517, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Click-baiting for Diamonds: A Sparkling Investigation into the Relationship Between Vihart Video Titles and the Number of Jewelers in Florida"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a holistic examination of the enthralling link between the clickbait nature of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of jewelers in the Sunshine State. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have rigorously scrutinized this seemingly peculiar connection. Our study, spanning from 2009 to 2022, has yielded a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8581676 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a compelling relationship that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance.

Honing in on the curious correlation, we have unearthed a wealth of fascinating insights and findings, shedding light on the influence of enticing video titles on consumer behavior and the jewelry industry's local dynamics. Our analysis not only underscores the tangible impact of clickbait-y video titles on the entrepreneurial landscape but also dabbles in the realm of dad jokes to bring levity to this captivating interplay. After all, a study on Vihart video titles and jewelers in Florida wouldn't be complete without a "cutting-edge" joke or a "facet"-ious pun! So, join us as we delve into this gem of a topic, where statistical correlations meet the sparkle of YouTube clickbait, providing both empirical evidence and a touch of lighthearted humor.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
As the old saying goes, "Diamonds are a girl's best friend" – but what about viral video titles? In this paper, we embark on a sparkling journey to examine the intriguing relationship between the clickbait nature of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of jewelers in the state of Florida. While this may sound like an unexpected pairing, we assure you that our investigation is more than just a "faceted" attempt at humor.
Now, before we "dive" headfirst into our analysis, picture this: a statistician walks into a jewelry store and asks to calculate the carat weight of their data. The jeweler scoffs and says, "You'll have to be more specific – we deal in gems, not statistics!" Though the pun may be "uncut," it emphasizes the often unforeseen intersections between statistical analysis and industries that are traditionally viewed through a different lens.
Intriguingly, the allure of clickbait has extended its reach beyond the online realm, and notably, into the physical markets that adorn the fingers, necks, and ears of the populace. Our study seeks to provide a rigorous examination of this peculiar relationship, shedding light on the potential influence of captivating video titles on consumer behavior and local business landscapes. After all, who would have thought that a click-worthy title could wield such influence over the sparkle of diamonds and the gleam of economic activity?
As we embark on this investigation, it's important to note that humor and statistical analysis are not often deemed synonymous bedfellows. However, our intention is not to simply "polish" this correlation for its comedic potential, but rather to showcase the unexpected ways in which statistical investigations can illuminate captivating connections in the world around us.
Speaking of surprising connections, did you hear about the statistician who became a jeweler? She found that making statistical inferences and crafting intricate jewelry were more similar than she expected – after all, they both involved a keen eye for detail and a propensity for carefully "setting" stones in place. We hope to mirror this notion as we delve into the intricate interplay between YouTube clickbait and the jewelry industry, aiming to uncover empirical evidence with a touch of whimsy.
So, join us as we embark on this "facet"-inating journey, where empirical correlations and lighthearted humor converge to reveal the unexpected sparkle of statistical analysis in a world filled with intriguing, yet often overlooked, relationships.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation revealed a striking correlation between the clickbait nature of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of jewelers in Florida. Over the period from 2009 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.8581676, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. In other words, as the allure of clickbait in Vihart's video titles increased, so did the number of jewelers in the Sunshine State. This unexpected connection underscores the impact of online content on local economic dynamics, adding a delightful twist to the conventional understanding of consumer behavior and market trends.

Now, as these results "carat" their way into the discussion, let's not "facet" the facts – the statistical significance of this correlation cannot be overlooked. With an r-squared value of 0.7364517 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings withstand rigorous statistical scrutiny. This robust evidence further solidifies the relationship between the captivating allure of clickbait in online content and the entrepreneurial landscape of the jewelry industry in Florida, making it clear that there's more than meets the "I" when it comes to YouTube titles and economic activity.

In Fig. 1, our scatterplot visually represents the pronounced correlation we observed. The strong positive trend depicted in the scatterplot underscores the compelling connection between Vihart's clickbait-y titles and the proliferation of jewelers in Florida. It's as if each clickbait title is a gem of its own, sparkling with the potential to influence consumer behavior and entrepreneurial endeavors – a true "facet" of modern commerce that cannot be facetiously dismissed.

These results not only contribute to our understanding of the intricate interplay between online content and local economic activity but also highlight the unforeseen intersections between seemingly unrelated domains. This study serves as a reminder that statistical investigations can unearth captivating relationships in the most unexpected places – much like stumbling upon a hidden gem in a vast sea of data.

In conclusion, our findings underscore the significant influence of clickbait-y Vihart video titles on the entrepreneurial landscape of the jewelry industry in Florida. We hope that this investigation not only sheds light on this compelling correlation but also adds a touch of lightheartedness to the often-serious world of statistical analysis. After all, as we navigate the depths of data, a well-placed dad joke can be like a polished diamond – a rare and delightful find that adds a touch of sparkle wherever it may "facet"iously land.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Vihart YouTube video titles are and The number of jewelers in Florida. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Click-baiting for Diamonds: A Sparkling Investigation into the Relationship Between Vihart Video Titles and the Number of Jewelers in Florida"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a holistic examination of the enthralling link between the clickbait nature of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of jewelers in the Sunshine State. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have rigorously scrutinized this seemingly peculiar connection. Our study, spanning from 2009 to 2022, has yielded a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8581676 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a compelling relationship that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance.

Honing in on the curious correlation, we have unearthed a wealth of fascinating insights and findings, shedding light on the influence of enticing video titles on consumer behavior and the jewelry industry's local dynamics. Our analysis not only underscores the tangible impact of clickbait-y video titles on the entrepreneurial landscape but also dabbles in the realm of dad jokes to bring levity to this captivating interplay. After all, a study on Vihart video titles and jewelers in Florida wouldn't be complete without a "cutting-edge" joke or a "facet"-ious pun! So, join us as we delve into this gem of a topic, where statistical correlations meet the sparkle of YouTube clickbait, providing both empirical evidence and a touch of lighthearted humor.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In a seminal study by Smith et al., the authors find a noteworthy correlation between the clickbait nature of YouTube video titles and consumer engagement. Building upon this foundation, Doe and Jones delve into the realm of consumer behavior, uncovering the intricate ways in which attention-grabbing titles can influence viewers' choices. These studies underscore the pervasive influence of clickbait content in shaping consumer preferences and highlight the potential ramifications for various industries.
Now, turning to the captivating world of jewelers in Florida, it is essential to consider the seminal works of "Diamonds: The Antoinette Matlins Buying Guide" and "The Jewelry Maker's Design Book: An Alchemy of Objects," both of which provide invaluable insights into the complexities of the jewelry market. As these texts meticulously detail the art and science of jewelry making and purchasing, we are reminded that our investigation into clickbait-y Vihart video titles and the presence of jewelers in Florida seamlessly intertwines with this rich tapestry of industry dynamics and consumer behavior.
On a lighter note, we cannot overlook the entertaining yet captivating allure of fictional works such as "The Diamond as Big as the Ritz" and "The Moonstone," which, despite their narrative context, offer intriguing parallels to our study. These literary gems, with their intricate plots and immersive storytelling, serve as a poignant reminder of the enduring fascination with precious stones and the industries built around them. As we navigate the labyrinth of Vihart video titles and the world of jewelers, these literary references add a touch of whimsy to our exploration, much like a cleverly crafted pun in a statistical analysis.
Speaking of clever puns, a recent social media post cleverly quipped, "Is Florida the Sunshine State or the Sparkle State? With all these jewelers, it's hard to tell!" The comedic undertone of this post belies a thought-provoking observation about the prevalence of jewelers in Florida, and by extension, the potential impact of Vihart video titles on the local market. This lighthearted remark serves as a reminder that statistical investigations can be as illuminating as they are entertaining, much like a well-timed dad joke at a scientific conference.
As we traverse the realm of empirical research, literary allusions, and social media musings, our study seeks to intertwine rigorous analysis with a touch of levity, echoing the multifaceted nature of our investigation. In this convergence of statistical correlations, literary inspirations, and social commentary, we aim to unveil the unexpected sparkle of Vihart video titles and the colorful landscape of the jewelry industry, all while maintaining a "facet"-ious spirit of inquiry.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed a striking correlation between the clickbait nature of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of jewelers in Florida. Over the period from 2009 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.8581676, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. In other words, as the allure of clickbait in Vihart's video titles increased, so did the number of jewelers in the Sunshine State. This unexpected connection underscores the impact of online content on local economic dynamics, adding a delightful twist to the conventional understanding of consumer behavior and market trends.
Now, as these results "carat" their way into the discussion, let's not "facet" the facts – the statistical significance of this correlation cannot be overlooked. With an r-squared value of 0.7364517 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings withstand rigorous statistical scrutiny. This robust evidence further solidifies the relationship between the captivating allure of clickbait in online content and the entrepreneurial landscape of the jewelry industry in Florida, making it clear that there's more than meets the "I" when it comes to YouTube titles and economic activity.
In Fig. 1, our scatterplot visually represents the pronounced correlation we observed. The strong positive trend depicted in the scatterplot underscores the compelling connection between Vihart's clickbait-y titles and the proliferation of jewelers in Florida. It's as if each clickbait title is a gem of its own, sparkling with the potential to influence consumer behavior and entrepreneurial endeavors – a true "facet" of modern commerce that cannot be facetiously dismissed.
These results not only contribute to our understanding of the intricate interplay between online content and local economic activity but also highlight the unforeseen intersections between seemingly unrelated domains. This study serves as a reminder that statistical investigations can unearth captivating relationships in the most unexpected places – much like stumbling upon a hidden gem in a vast sea of data.
In conclusion, our findings underscore the significant influence of clickbait-y Vihart video titles on the entrepreneurial landscape of the jewelry industry in Florida. We hope that this investigation not only sheds light on this compelling correlation but also adds a touch of lightheartedness to the often-serious world of statistical analysis. After all, as we navigate the depths of data, a well-placed dad joke can be like a polished diamond – a rare and delightful find that adds a touch of sparkle wherever it may "facet"iously land.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our investigation reveal a fascinating relationship between the clickbait-y nature of Vihart YouTube video titles and the presence of jewelers in Florida. Through our robust statistical analysis, we have illuminated a strong positive correlation, supporting the notion that the allure of clickbait in online content can indeed influence entrepreneurial activity in the jewelry industry. As we "facet" these results into our discussion, it becomes evident that the influence of YouTube video titles extends beyond mere entertainment, leaving an indelible mark on local economic dynamics.

The correlation coefficient of 0.8581676 signifies a remarkably strong relationship between Vihart’s clickbait-y video titles and the number of jewelers in Florida, providing empirical support for the hypothesis that online content, when designed to captivate and entice, can have tangible implications for consumer behavior and market trends. One might say that our results are as striking as a flawlessly cut diamond – clear, precise, and sure to catch the eye, much like a well-crafted dad joke in a serious discussion.

Building upon prior research by Smith et al. and Doe and Jones, which delved into the influence of attention-grabbing content on consumer engagement and behavior, our study expands this understanding to the domain of local economic activity. In doing so, we "cut" through the traditional narratives of consumer behavior and market trends, revealing the unexpected sparkle of Vihart video titles and their impact on local entrepreneurship. It's safe to say that our results have added a valuable "gem" to the existing body of literature, one that offers a fresh perspective on the role of online content in shaping industry dynamics.

As our scatterplot visually portrays the conspicuous positive trend between clickbait-y video titles and the proliferation of jewelers in Florida, it becomes apparent that our findings are not mere statistical anomalies but rather "gems" waiting to be unearthed. This unexpected correlation challenges conventional wisdom, illustrating the unanticipated intersections between the virtual realm of online content and the material world of entrepreneurial endeavors. Such revelation is akin to discovering a hidden treasure trove within the depths of statistical analysis – a delightfully unexpected turn, much like a well-timed dad joke in a scholarly discussion.

In the fluid landscape of consumer preferences, market trends, and entrepreneurial endeavors, our study offers a multifaceted perspective, treating statistical analysis with the gravity it deserves while leaving room for the occasional pun or whimsical remark. By embracing this "facet"ious spirit of inquiry, we hope to spark intellectual curiosity and add a touch of levity to the often-serious discourse of empirical research. After all, just as every meticulously crafted gem tells a unique story, our findings add a captivating chapter to the ongoing narrative of consumer behavior and local economic activity.

The intricate relationship between Vihart video titles and the presence of jewelers in Florida presents a compelling opportunity for further exploration and scrutiny. This unexpected connection not only underscores the far-reaching influence of online content but also invites future studies to delve deeper into the mechanisms through which clickbait-y titles shape entrepreneurial landscapes. As we pave the way for future investigations, we remain mindful of the potential for delight and surprise in scholarly pursuits, much like stumbling upon a well-crafted dad joke in the midst of a serious academic discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Vihart YouTube video titles are and The number of jewelers in Florida. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Click-baiting for Diamonds: A Sparkling Investigation into the Relationship Between Vihart Video Titles and the Number of Jewelers in Florida"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a holistic examination of the enthralling link between the clickbait nature of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of jewelers in the Sunshine State. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have rigorously scrutinized this seemingly peculiar connection. Our study, spanning from 2009 to 2022, has yielded a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8581676 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a compelling relationship that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance.

Honing in on the curious correlation, we have unearthed a wealth of fascinating insights and findings, shedding light on the influence of enticing video titles on consumer behavior and the jewelry industry's local dynamics. Our analysis not only underscores the tangible impact of clickbait-y video titles on the entrepreneurial landscape but also dabbles in the realm of dad jokes to bring levity to this captivating interplay. After all, a study on Vihart video titles and jewelers in Florida wouldn't be complete without a "cutting-edge" joke or a "facet"-ious pun! So, join us as we delve into this gem of a topic, where statistical correlations meet the sparkle of YouTube clickbait, providing both empirical evidence and a touch of lighthearted humor.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
As the old saying goes, "Diamonds are a girl's best friend" – but what about viral video titles? In this paper, we embark on a sparkling journey to examine the intriguing relationship between the clickbait nature of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of jewelers in the state of Florida. While this may sound like an unexpected pairing, we assure you that our investigation is more than just a "faceted" attempt at humor.
Now, before we "dive" headfirst into our analysis, picture this: a statistician walks into a jewelry store and asks to calculate the carat weight of their data. The jeweler scoffs and says, "You'll have to be more specific – we deal in gems, not statistics!" Though the pun may be "uncut," it emphasizes the often unforeseen intersections between statistical analysis and industries that are traditionally viewed through a different lens.
Intriguingly, the allure of clickbait has extended its reach beyond the online realm, and notably, into the physical markets that adorn the fingers, necks, and ears of the populace. Our study seeks to provide a rigorous examination of this peculiar relationship, shedding light on the potential influence of captivating video titles on consumer behavior and local business landscapes. After all, who would have thought that a click-worthy title could wield such influence over the sparkle of diamonds and the gleam of economic activity?
As we embark on this investigation, it's important to note that humor and statistical analysis are not often deemed synonymous bedfellows. However, our intention is not to simply "polish" this correlation for its comedic potential, but rather to showcase the unexpected ways in which statistical investigations can illuminate captivating connections in the world around us.
Speaking of surprising connections, did you hear about the statistician who became a jeweler? She found that making statistical inferences and crafting intricate jewelry were more similar than she expected – after all, they both involved a keen eye for detail and a propensity for carefully "setting" stones in place. We hope to mirror this notion as we delve into the intricate interplay between YouTube clickbait and the jewelry industry, aiming to uncover empirical evidence with a touch of whimsy.
So, join us as we embark on this "facet"-inating journey, where empirical correlations and lighthearted humor converge to reveal the unexpected sparkle of statistical analysis in a world filled with intriguing, yet often overlooked, relationships.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed a striking correlation between the clickbait nature of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of jewelers in Florida. Over the period from 2009 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.8581676, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. In other words, as the allure of clickbait in Vihart's video titles increased, so did the number of jewelers in the Sunshine State. This unexpected connection underscores the impact of online content on local economic dynamics, adding a delightful twist to the conventional understanding of consumer behavior and market trends.
Now, as these results "carat" their way into the discussion, let's not "facet" the facts – the statistical significance of this correlation cannot be overlooked. With an r-squared value of 0.7364517 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings withstand rigorous statistical scrutiny. This robust evidence further solidifies the relationship between the captivating allure of clickbait in online content and the entrepreneurial landscape of the jewelry industry in Florida, making it clear that there's more than meets the "I" when it comes to YouTube titles and economic activity.
In Fig. 1, our scatterplot visually represents the pronounced correlation we observed. The strong positive trend depicted in the scatterplot underscores the compelling connection between Vihart's clickbait-y titles and the proliferation of jewelers in Florida. It's as if each clickbait title is a gem of its own, sparkling with the potential to influence consumer behavior and entrepreneurial endeavors – a true "facet" of modern commerce that cannot be facetiously dismissed.
These results not only contribute to our understanding of the intricate interplay between online content and local economic activity but also highlight the unforeseen intersections between seemingly unrelated domains. This study serves as a reminder that statistical investigations can unearth captivating relationships in the most unexpected places – much like stumbling upon a hidden gem in a vast sea of data.
In conclusion, our findings underscore the significant influence of clickbait-y Vihart video titles on the entrepreneurial landscape of the jewelry industry in Florida. We hope that this investigation not only sheds light on this compelling correlation but also adds a touch of lightheartedness to the often-serious world of statistical analysis. After all, as we navigate the depths of data, a well-placed dad joke can be like a polished diamond – a rare and delightful find that adds a touch of sparkle wherever it may "facet"iously land.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In this "gem" of a study, we have illuminated a surprising correlation between the clickbait nature of Vihart YouTube video titles and the proliferation of jewelers in the Sunshine State. Our findings not only "facet" the challenges of traditional statistical analysis but also provide a sparkling example of the unexpected unions that statistical investigations can uncover.

As we wrap up this discussion, it's worth noting that our results serve as a testament to the far-reaching influence of online content on local economic dynamics. Much like a well-cut diamond, Vihart's clickbait-y titles have displayed a captivating ability to attract attention and potentially shape consumer behavior, thereby influencing the entrepreneurial landscape of Florida's jewelry industry. It appears that the allure of clickbait extends beyond the digital realm, sparkling forth into the physical market space in an unexpected, yet undeniable manner.

We hope that our "facet"-ious approach to this investigation has added a touch of lightheartedness to the traditionally serious domain of statistical analysis. After all, exploring the sparkle of YouTube titles and economic activity can benefit from an occasional injection of humor, much like the joy of discovering a perfectly timed dad joke. Speaking of which, did you hear about the statistician who calculated the average carat weight of all her jewelry? She found it to be a "mean" pair of earrings!

In true statistical fashion, we confidently assert that no further research in this area is needed. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8581676 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, our findings stand as a diamond in the rough, shedding light on the intriguing interplay between captivating online content and local business landscapes. Therefore, let's "facet" the facts and conclude that our investigation has successfully charted the unexpected brilliance of this correlation, leaving no stone unturned in our exploration of the nexus between YouTube clickbait and Florida's jewelry industry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Click-baiting for Diamonds: A Sparkling Investigation into the Relationship Between Vihart Video Titles and the Number of Jewelers in Florida. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Social Media and Gemology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Click-baiting for Diamonds: A Sparkling Investigation into the Relationship Between Vihart Video Titles and the Number of Jewelers in Florida. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Whimsical Research and Inquiry


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Click-baiting for Diamonds: A Sparkling Investigation into the Relationship Between Vihart Video Titles and the Number of Jewelers in Florida with an abstract of This paper presents a holistic examination of the enthralling link between the clickbait nature of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of jewelers in the Sunshine State. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have rigorously scrutinized this seemingly peculiar connection. Our study, spanning from 2009 to 2022, has yielded a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8581676 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a compelling relationship that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance.
Honing in on the curious correlation, we have unearthed a wealth of fascinating insights and findings, shedding light on the influence of enticing video titles on consumer behavior and the jewelry industry's local dynamics. Our analysis not only underscores the tangible impact of clickbait-y video titles on the entrepreneurial landscape but also dabbles in the realm of dad jokes to bring levity to this captivating interplay. After all, a study on Vihart video titles and jewelers in Florida wouldn't be complete without a "cutting-edge" joke or a "facet"-ious pun! So, join us as we delve into this gem of a topic, where statistical correlations meet the sparkle of YouTube clickbait, providing both empirical evidence and a touch of lighthearted humor.

ChatGPT:

Vihart, YouTube video titles, jewelers, Florida, clickbait, consumer behavior, Bureau of Labor Statistics, AI analysis, statistical correlation, jewelry industry, local dynamics, Florida economy, dad jokes.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How clickbait-y Vihart's YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How clickbait-y Vihart YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How clickbait-y Vihart's YouTube video titles are

The number of jewelers in Florida
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of jewelers and precious stone and metal workers in Florida
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of jewelers in Florida

Correlation r = 0.8581676 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7364517 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 73.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of jewelers in Florida) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How clickbait-y Vihart's YouTube video titles are) over the 14 years from 2009 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.6E-5. 0.0000859709728742167800000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 0.0086% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 11,632 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 13 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 13 because we have two variables measured over a period of 14 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.6, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
How clickbait-y Vihart's YouTube video titles are (Clickbait-y score)6.37534.23534.1294.384633.666733.71434.63643.3333355.1667
The number of jewelers in Florida (Laborers)17101070143013201280106011901070125012601370123016901760




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([6.375,3,4.2353,4.129,4.3846,3,3.6667,3,3.7143,4.6364,3.3333,3,5,5.1667,])
array_2 = np.array([1710,1070,1430,1320,1280,1060,1190,1070,1250,1260,1370,1230,1690,1760,])
array_1_name = "How clickbait-y Vihart's YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "The number of jewelers in Florida"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 5774 · Black Variable ID: 25556 · Red Variable ID: 6669
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0