about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,768 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska and the second variable is Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the support for the Libertarian candidate grew, so did the desire to take a different direction, leading to an increase in car usage. With more people on the road, the airbags were getting an unexpected workout, prompting the rise in automotive recalls. Remember, when it comes to politics and car safety, it's all about the airbag of votes!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image with a dystopian cyber art style. Picture a crowded Alaskan town, where cars flood the streets as people rush to the polling stations to cast their votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate. The airbags in the vehicles are shown frequently deploying as they maneuver through the congested roads, conveying the strain on the systems. Simultaneously, a rising number of cars are being recalled due to airbag problems, hinting at the heightened demand for car usage driven by the surge in support for the Libertarian candidate. The scene should emphasize the parallel between the chaotic traffic and the strain on the vehicles' safety systems. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: 3D Pixar Style Cute 2D animation Cute 2D animation Data cyber art An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'
ChatGPT: Data cyber art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags, in the following situation: As the support for the Libertarian candidate grew, so did the desire to take a different direction, leading to an increase in car usage. With more people on the road, the airbags were getting an unexpected workout, prompting the rise in automotive recalls. Remember, when it comes to politics and car safety, it's all about the airbag of votes!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Alaskan town, a stream of cars fills the streets as people head to the polls to vote for the Libertarian Presidential candidate. The airbags in the cars are activated frequently as the vehicles navigate the busy roads, causing strain on the systems. At the same time, a growing number of vehicles are being recalled due to airbag issues, reflecting the increased demand on car usage driven by the surge in support for the Libertarian candidate.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Data cyber art ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Alaskan town, a stream of cars fills the streets as people head to the polls to vote for the Libertarian Presidential candidate. The airbags in the cars are activated frequently as the vehicles navigate the busy roads, causing strain on the systems. At the same time, a growing number of vehicles are being recalled due to airbag issues, reflecting the increased demand on car usage driven by the surge in support for the Libertarian candidate. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image with a dystopian cyber art style. Picture a crowded Alaskan town, where cars flood the streets as people rush to the polling stations to cast their votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate. The airbags in the vehicles are shown frequently deploying as they maneuver through the congested roads, conveying the strain on the systems. Simultaneously, a rising number of cars are being recalled due to airbag problems, hinting at the heightened demand for car usage driven by the surge in support for the Libertarian candidate. The scene should emphasize the parallel between the chaotic traffic and the strain on the vehicles' safety systems.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska caused Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Air Bags and Ballots: A Study of Libertarian Votes in Alaska and Automotive Recalls

The Journal of Libertarian Studies and Automotive Safety

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9719805 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Air Bags and Ballots: A Study of Libertarian Votes in Alaska and Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the fascinating correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we uncovered a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9719805 and p < 0.01 for the period from 1990 to 2020. It's as if the air bags were trying to inflate the candidate's vote count!

Our findings raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of political preferences on consumer behavior and highlight the need for further investigation into the interplay of politics and product safety. Additionally, we cannot air our findings without acknowledging the impact of this research on the automotive and political spheres.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Bags and Ballots: A Study of Libertarian Votes in Alaska and Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the fascinating correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we uncovered a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9719805 and p < 0.01 for the period from 1990 to 2020. It's as if the air bags were trying to inflate the candidate's vote count!

Our findings raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of political preferences on consumer behavior and highlight the need for further investigation into the interplay of politics and product safety. Additionally, we cannot air our findings without acknowledging the impact of this research on the automotive and political spheres.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of politics and consumer behavior has long been a topic of interest for researchers seeking to understand the complex dynamics that shape decision-making processes. In this study, we delve into the unexpected relationship between votes cast for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and automotive recalls pertaining to air bag malfunctions. It's almost as if the air bags were deflating the hopes of the candidate's success!

The state of Alaska offers a unique setting for our investigation, given its distinctive political landscape and the singular underlying factors that may drive voter preferences. As the last frontier, it seems only fitting that this state would play a role in uncovering such an intriguing connection. One might say it's the "Alaska-tomy" of political and automotive correlations.

The study is primarily motivated by the lack of prior research on this specific linkage, as well as the potential implications for public safety, consumer behavior, and electoral forecasting. By conducting a thorough analysis of data spanning from 1990 to 2020, we aim to shed light on this unusual correspondence and its wider implications. We decided to dive into this study headfirst, just like air bags in a collision.

Our research not only aims to contribute to the academic literature on political behavior and consumer choices but also seeks to provide valuable insights for policymakers, automotive manufacturers, and potential future presidential candidates. After all, it's crucial to have an "airtight" understanding of the factors that influence voting patterns and product safety risks.

In the following sections, we will present the methodology employed for data collection and analysis, followed by a comprehensive exploration of our findings. Hopefully, our research doesn't "deflate" your expectations!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Bags and Ballots: A Study of Libertarian Votes in Alaska and Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the fascinating correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we uncovered a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9719805 and p < 0.01 for the period from 1990 to 2020. It's as if the air bags were trying to inflate the candidate's vote count!

Our findings raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of political preferences on consumer behavior and highlight the need for further investigation into the interplay of politics and product safety. Additionally, we cannot air our findings without acknowledging the impact of this research on the automotive and political spheres.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of politics and consumer behavior has long been a topic of interest for researchers seeking to understand the complex dynamics that shape decision-making processes. In this study, we delve into the unexpected relationship between votes cast for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and automotive recalls pertaining to air bag malfunctions. It's almost as if the air bags were deflating the hopes of the candidate's success!
The state of Alaska offers a unique setting for our investigation, given its distinctive political landscape and the singular underlying factors that may drive voter preferences. As the last frontier, it seems only fitting that this state would play a role in uncovering such an intriguing connection. One might say it's the "Alaska-tomy" of political and automotive correlations.
The study is primarily motivated by the lack of prior research on this specific linkage, as well as the potential implications for public safety, consumer behavior, and electoral forecasting. By conducting a thorough analysis of data spanning from 1990 to 2020, we aim to shed light on this unusual correspondence and its wider implications. We decided to dive into this study headfirst, just like air bags in a collision.
Our research not only aims to contribute to the academic literature on political behavior and consumer choices but also seeks to provide valuable insights for policymakers, automotive manufacturers, and potential future presidential candidates. After all, it's crucial to have an "airtight" understanding of the factors that influence voting patterns and product safety risks.
In the following sections, we will present the methodology employed for data collection and analysis, followed by a comprehensive exploration of our findings. Hopefully, our research doesn't "deflate" your expectations!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Previous studies by Smith (2010), Doe (2015), and Jones (2018) have extensively explored the link between political preferences and consumer behaviors. However, none have dared to venture into the peculiar realm of the relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and automotive recalls for airbag issues. It's as if these researchers were afraid of "crashing" into uncharted territory.

In "Cars and Votes: Understanding the Unlikely Correlation," the authors find that there is a statistically significant correlation between the number of votes for the Libertarian candidate in Alaska and the frequency of automotive recalls related to airbag malfunctions, suggesting a surprising connection between political leanings and vehicular safety concerns. It's almost as if the candidates are "inflating" their support through automotive recalls.

In their book "Engines and Elections: Exploring Unconventional Relationships," Smith and Johnson (2017) reveal that the correlation coefficient between Libertarian votes in Alaska and airbag-related automotive recalls is higher than previously anticipated, hinting at a potential influence of political ideologies on airbag performance. One could say it's an "air-raising" revelation!

If we take a fictional approach to related literature, we might draw inspiration from books such as "The Art of Political Airbag Deployment," "Libertarianism on the Road: A Tale of Recalls and Rebels," and "Inflated Ideals: The Ballot Bag Conundrum." These fictitious works offer a whimsical twist to the serious subject matter at hand, much like a well-timed dad joke at a scholarly conference.

Drawing from less conventional sources, one cannot overlook the contributions of popular board games to the discourse. Games like "Crash Landing: The Political Edition" and "Recall Risk: Election Day" may not provide empirical evidence, but their imaginative scenarios may tickle the fancy of researchers delving into the intersection of politics and automotive safety. After all, who doesn't appreciate a "board" approach to scholarly pursuits?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT . You used data from 1990 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Bags and Ballots: A Study of Libertarian Votes in Alaska and Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the fascinating correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we uncovered a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9719805 and p < 0.01 for the period from 1990 to 2020. It's as if the air bags were trying to inflate the candidate's vote count!

Our findings raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of political preferences on consumer behavior and highlight the need for further investigation into the interplay of politics and product safety. Additionally, we cannot air our findings without acknowledging the impact of this research on the automotive and political spheres.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of politics and consumer behavior has long been a topic of interest for researchers seeking to understand the complex dynamics that shape decision-making processes. In this study, we delve into the unexpected relationship between votes cast for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and automotive recalls pertaining to air bag malfunctions. It's almost as if the air bags were deflating the hopes of the candidate's success!
The state of Alaska offers a unique setting for our investigation, given its distinctive political landscape and the singular underlying factors that may drive voter preferences. As the last frontier, it seems only fitting that this state would play a role in uncovering such an intriguing connection. One might say it's the "Alaska-tomy" of political and automotive correlations.
The study is primarily motivated by the lack of prior research on this specific linkage, as well as the potential implications for public safety, consumer behavior, and electoral forecasting. By conducting a thorough analysis of data spanning from 1990 to 2020, we aim to shed light on this unusual correspondence and its wider implications. We decided to dive into this study headfirst, just like air bags in a collision.
Our research not only aims to contribute to the academic literature on political behavior and consumer choices but also seeks to provide valuable insights for policymakers, automotive manufacturers, and potential future presidential candidates. After all, it's crucial to have an "airtight" understanding of the factors that influence voting patterns and product safety risks.
In the following sections, we will present the methodology employed for data collection and analysis, followed by a comprehensive exploration of our findings. Hopefully, our research doesn't "deflate" your expectations!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
The data for this study was collected from a variety of sources, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation. It was as if we were on a treasure hunt for the ultimate dataset! The election data provided information on votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska, while the Department of Transportation offered records of automotive recalls related to air bag issues. It was a process akin to sifting through political and automotive "haystacks" to find the elusive needles of correlation.

Data Filtering and Preparation:
Upon retrieval, the data underwent meticulous cleaning and transformation procedures to ensure its suitability for analysis. We filtered out any spurious entries and anomalies, separating the proverbial "chaff" from the "wheat" of relevant information. The datasets were then merged, creating a comprehensive repository of information that allowed for subsequent quantitative analysis. It was an amalgamation process that rivaled the fusion of political ideologies in a high-stakes debate.

Correlation Analysis:
To explore the potential relationship between Libertarian votes in Alaska and automotive recalls for air bag issues, we employed advanced statistical techniques. The correlation coefficient was calculated to determine the strength and direction of the association between these variables. The results yielded a coefficient of 0.9719805 and p < 0.01, indicating a remarkably robust correlation. It was almost as if the air bags were aiming for a political "recount"!

Time-Series Analysis:
Additionally, a time-series analysis was conducted to examine the temporal patterns of Libertarian votes and automotive recalls over the period from 1990 to 2020. This analysis allowed for the identification of potential trends and fluctuations in the data, shedding light on the evolving dynamics between political elections and automotive safety issues. It was like tracing the rise and fall of political fortunes and air bag deployments over the decades.

Sensitivity Analysis:
Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the stability of the correlation under various conditions and assumptions. This rigorous evaluation provided insights into the robustness of the observed relationship, considering different scenarios and statistical parameters. It was a process akin to stress-testing the correlation, ensuring its resilience in the face of methodological challenges. One might say we put the correlation through its "air bag crash test"!

In conclusion, the methodology employed in this study facilitated a comprehensive and rigorous investigation of the relationship between Libertarian votes in Alaska and automotive recalls for air bag issues. The next section will delve into the compelling findings that emerged from this captivating analysis. We hope these findings don't "pop" the bubble of anticipation!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT .

For the time period 1990 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9719805, r-squared of 0.9447462, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Bags and Ballots: A Study of Libertarian Votes in Alaska and Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the fascinating correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we uncovered a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9719805 and p < 0.01 for the period from 1990 to 2020. It's as if the air bags were trying to inflate the candidate's vote count!

Our findings raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of political preferences on consumer behavior and highlight the need for further investigation into the interplay of politics and product safety. Additionally, we cannot air our findings without acknowledging the impact of this research on the automotive and political spheres.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of politics and consumer behavior has long been a topic of interest for researchers seeking to understand the complex dynamics that shape decision-making processes. In this study, we delve into the unexpected relationship between votes cast for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and automotive recalls pertaining to air bag malfunctions. It's almost as if the air bags were deflating the hopes of the candidate's success!
The state of Alaska offers a unique setting for our investigation, given its distinctive political landscape and the singular underlying factors that may drive voter preferences. As the last frontier, it seems only fitting that this state would play a role in uncovering such an intriguing connection. One might say it's the "Alaska-tomy" of political and automotive correlations.
The study is primarily motivated by the lack of prior research on this specific linkage, as well as the potential implications for public safety, consumer behavior, and electoral forecasting. By conducting a thorough analysis of data spanning from 1990 to 2020, we aim to shed light on this unusual correspondence and its wider implications. We decided to dive into this study headfirst, just like air bags in a collision.
Our research not only aims to contribute to the academic literature on political behavior and consumer choices but also seeks to provide valuable insights for policymakers, automotive manufacturers, and potential future presidential candidates. After all, it's crucial to have an "airtight" understanding of the factors that influence voting patterns and product safety risks.
In the following sections, we will present the methodology employed for data collection and analysis, followed by a comprehensive exploration of our findings. Hopefully, our research doesn't "deflate" your expectations!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The findings of our empirical analysis revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and automotive recalls related to air bag issues. The correlation coefficient of 0.9719805 and an r-squared value of 0.9447462 indicated a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It's as if the political winds were blowing the air bags in a particular direction!

To illustrate this striking correlation, we present in Figure 1 a scatterplot displaying the clear association between the number of votes for the Libertarian candidate and the frequency of automotive recalls for air bag malfunctions. The data points closely align to form a pattern that would make any statistician's heart beat faster. The figure speaks for itself, much like a well-timed dad joke at a family gathering.

The high correlation coefficient and r-squared value suggest that a substantial proportion of the variability in automotive recalls for air bag issues can be explained by the number of votes garnered by the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska. It's as if the candidate's popularity is inflating the number of automotive issues reported!

Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, further supporting the assertion that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance. One might say this result is quite an "air-tight" case against randomness.

In summary, our analysis unearths a compelling linkage between political votes and automotive safety concerns, presenting a conundrum worthy of further investigation and mirth-worthy puns.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Air Bags and Ballots: A Study of Libertarian Votes in Alaska and Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the fascinating correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we uncovered a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9719805 and p < 0.01 for the period from 1990 to 2020. It's as if the air bags were trying to inflate the candidate's vote count!

Our findings raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of political preferences on consumer behavior and highlight the need for further investigation into the interplay of politics and product safety. Additionally, we cannot air our findings without acknowledging the impact of this research on the automotive and political spheres.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previous studies by Smith (2010), Doe (2015), and Jones (2018) have extensively explored the link between political preferences and consumer behaviors. However, none have dared to venture into the peculiar realm of the relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and automotive recalls for airbag issues. It's as if these researchers were afraid of "crashing" into uncharted territory.
In "Cars and Votes: Understanding the Unlikely Correlation," the authors find that there is a statistically significant correlation between the number of votes for the Libertarian candidate in Alaska and the frequency of automotive recalls related to airbag malfunctions, suggesting a surprising connection between political leanings and vehicular safety concerns. It's almost as if the candidates are "inflating" their support through automotive recalls.
In their book "Engines and Elections: Exploring Unconventional Relationships," Smith and Johnson (2017) reveal that the correlation coefficient between Libertarian votes in Alaska and airbag-related automotive recalls is higher than previously anticipated, hinting at a potential influence of political ideologies on airbag performance. One could say it's an "air-raising" revelation!
If we take a fictional approach to related literature, we might draw inspiration from books such as "The Art of Political Airbag Deployment," "Libertarianism on the Road: A Tale of Recalls and Rebels," and "Inflated Ideals: The Ballot Bag Conundrum." These fictitious works offer a whimsical twist to the serious subject matter at hand, much like a well-timed dad joke at a scholarly conference.
Drawing from less conventional sources, one cannot overlook the contributions of popular board games to the discourse. Games like "Crash Landing: The Political Edition" and "Recall Risk: Election Day" may not provide empirical evidence, but their imaginative scenarios may tickle the fancy of researchers delving into the intersection of politics and automotive safety. After all, who doesn't appreciate a "board" approach to scholarly pursuits?

[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our empirical analysis revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and automotive recalls related to air bag issues. The correlation coefficient of 0.9719805 and an r-squared value of 0.9447462 indicated a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It's as if the political winds were blowing the air bags in a particular direction!
To illustrate this striking correlation, we present in Figure 1 a scatterplot displaying the clear association between the number of votes for the Libertarian candidate and the frequency of automotive recalls for air bag malfunctions. The data points closely align to form a pattern that would make any statistician's heart beat faster. The figure speaks for itself, much like a well-timed dad joke at a family gathering.
The high correlation coefficient and r-squared value suggest that a substantial proportion of the variability in automotive recalls for air bag issues can be explained by the number of votes garnered by the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska. It's as if the candidate's popularity is inflating the number of automotive issues reported!
Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, further supporting the assertion that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance. One might say this result is quite an "air-tight" case against randomness.
In summary, our analysis unearths a compelling linkage between political votes and automotive safety concerns, presenting a conundrum worthy of further investigation and mirth-worthy puns.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study reveal a robust and statistically significant correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and automotive recalls related to air bag issues. Our findings not only support the prior research conducted by Smith, Doe, and Jones, but they also expand upon it by demonstrating a strikingly high correlation coefficient and r-squared value. It is as if the air bags were seeking the support of political votes before deciding to "pop" into action.

The high correlation coefficient of 0.9719805 indicates a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables. This finding validates the work of previous researchers, who dared to explore the unconventional territory of the interplay between political leanings and automotive safety concerns. It's almost as if there's an "inflated" influence of political ideologies on airbag performance, as suggested by Smith and Johnson (2017).

The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence against the null hypothesis, further cementing the validity of our results. One could say that this result is airtight, much like a well-constructed airbag casing.

Our findings not only confirm the existence of a notable correlation but also emphasize the need for further investigation into the mechanisms underlying this intriguing relationship. It's as if this research has opened the "airbag" of curiosity, prompting an expansion of the scholarly discourse into the uncharted intersection of politics and automotive safety.

In conclusion, our study contributes to the field by uncovering a novel and substantial linkage between political votes and automotive safety concerns. The "inflated" influence of political preferences on airbag performance, as evidenced by our results, calls for continued scrutiny and analysis. After all, nothing should be left "uninflated" when it comes to studying such unexpected correlations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Air Bags and Ballots: A Study of Libertarian Votes in Alaska and Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the fascinating correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we uncovered a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9719805 and p < 0.01 for the period from 1990 to 2020. It's as if the air bags were trying to inflate the candidate's vote count!

Our findings raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of political preferences on consumer behavior and highlight the need for further investigation into the interplay of politics and product safety. Additionally, we cannot air our findings without acknowledging the impact of this research on the automotive and political spheres.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of politics and consumer behavior has long been a topic of interest for researchers seeking to understand the complex dynamics that shape decision-making processes. In this study, we delve into the unexpected relationship between votes cast for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and automotive recalls pertaining to air bag malfunctions. It's almost as if the air bags were deflating the hopes of the candidate's success!
The state of Alaska offers a unique setting for our investigation, given its distinctive political landscape and the singular underlying factors that may drive voter preferences. As the last frontier, it seems only fitting that this state would play a role in uncovering such an intriguing connection. One might say it's the "Alaska-tomy" of political and automotive correlations.
The study is primarily motivated by the lack of prior research on this specific linkage, as well as the potential implications for public safety, consumer behavior, and electoral forecasting. By conducting a thorough analysis of data spanning from 1990 to 2020, we aim to shed light on this unusual correspondence and its wider implications. We decided to dive into this study headfirst, just like air bags in a collision.
Our research not only aims to contribute to the academic literature on political behavior and consumer choices but also seeks to provide valuable insights for policymakers, automotive manufacturers, and potential future presidential candidates. After all, it's crucial to have an "airtight" understanding of the factors that influence voting patterns and product safety risks.
In the following sections, we will present the methodology employed for data collection and analysis, followed by a comprehensive exploration of our findings. Hopefully, our research doesn't "deflate" your expectations!

[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our empirical analysis revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and automotive recalls related to air bag issues. The correlation coefficient of 0.9719805 and an r-squared value of 0.9447462 indicated a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It's as if the political winds were blowing the air bags in a particular direction!
To illustrate this striking correlation, we present in Figure 1 a scatterplot displaying the clear association between the number of votes for the Libertarian candidate and the frequency of automotive recalls for air bag malfunctions. The data points closely align to form a pattern that would make any statistician's heart beat faster. The figure speaks for itself, much like a well-timed dad joke at a family gathering.
The high correlation coefficient and r-squared value suggest that a substantial proportion of the variability in automotive recalls for air bag issues can be explained by the number of votes garnered by the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska. It's as if the candidate's popularity is inflating the number of automotive issues reported!
Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, further supporting the assertion that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance. One might say this result is quite an "air-tight" case against randomness.
In summary, our analysis unearths a compelling linkage between political votes and automotive safety concerns, presenting a conundrum worthy of further investigation and mirth-worthy puns.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study unearths a compelling correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and automotive recalls related to air bag malfunctions. The robust relationship revealed in our analysis raises more questions than answers, leaving researchers and observers "air-bag-ging" for more insights. Our findings suggest the need for further investigation into the interplay of political drivers and product safety risks, as well as the potential influence of political preferences on consumer behavior. It's as if the political landscape is "air-bag-ious" in its effects on automotive safety concerns!

On a lighter note, it appears that the political winds blowing in Alaska may have unforeseen ramifications for automotive manufacturers. One might say that the "ballots" in Alaska have a direct impact on the "recalls" in automotive.

While the reasons behind this correlation remain uncertain, the "air" of mystery surrounding these findings is enough to provoke a "rattling" sense of curiosity. Perhaps this association is simply an "air-efutable" coincidence, or maybe there are underlying forces at play that warrant additional scrutiny. It's clear that we've "bagged" an intriguing discovery, but the "de-vice" behind this phenomenon remains to be fully understood.

Overall, our study sparks a humorous yet enlightening journey into the unexpected connections between political behavior and consumer trends. It's as if the "politics" of air bags is more complex than meets the eye. Our research serves as a "bag-of-tricks" that challenges conventional wisdom and prompts a reevaluation of the factors influencing voting patterns and product safety risks.

In light of these findings, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. It's time for us to "deflate" the potential for additional studies and let this one "inflate" its significance on its own.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Air Bags and Ballots: A Study of Libertarian Votes in Alaska and Automotive Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Libertarian Studies and Automotive Safety


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Air Bags and Ballots: A Study of Libertarian Votes in Alaska and Automotive Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Alaskan Liberty Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Air Bags and Ballots: A Study of Libertarian Votes in Alaska and Automotive Recalls with an abstract of This research paper investigates the fascinating correlation between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Alaska and automotive recalls for issues with air bags. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, we uncovered a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9719805 and p < 0.01 for the period from 1990 to 2020. It's as if the air bags were trying to inflate the candidate's vote count!
Our findings raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of political preferences on consumer behavior and highlight the need for further investigation into the interplay of politics and product safety. Additionally, we cannot air our findings without acknowledging the impact of this research on the automotive and political spheres.

ChatGPT:

air bags, automotive recalls, Libertarian votes, Alaska, correlation, political preferences, consumer behavior, product safety, politics, voting behavior, US Department of Transportation, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska
Detailed data title: Total votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska

Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags

Correlation r = 0.9719805 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9447462 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 94.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska) over the 8 years from 1990 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.4E-5. 0.0000538453164820743830000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 0.0054% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 18,572 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.85, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19921996200020042008201220162020
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska (Total votes)137822762636167515897392187258897
Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags (Recalls)481514132310658




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1378,2276,2636,1675,1589,7392,18725,8897,])
array_2 = np.array([4,8,15,14,13,23,106,58,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Alaska"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 5768 · Black Variable ID: 25948 · Red Variable ID: 1105
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0