Spurious correlation #5,706 · View random
A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air quality in Hickory, North Carolina and the second variable is Number of active magazines in the United States. The chart goes from 2002 to 2016, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air quality in Hickory, North Carolina and the second variable is Number of active magazines in the United States. The chart goes from 2002 to 2016, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

Download png, svg

AI explanation

The cleaner air in Hickory led to a surge in productivity at the local magazine printing factory, creating more jobs and demand for active magazines nationwide. You could say it really breathed new life into the industry!

^{Show image generation prompt} Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Create an image in the style of charcoal depicting a serene landscape in Hickory, North Carolina. Within the landscape, a modern magazine printing factory is prominently featured, with clear blue skies above. The absence of smokestacks and pollution is notable. The workers inside the factory are busily engaged in loading fresh paper into the machines. The surrounding greenery adds to the tranquil scene, with no signs of pollution in the air. The image should capture the sense of new life and increased productivity in the magazine industry brought about by the fresh air quality. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.

This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air quality in Hickory, North Carolina and Number of active magazines in the United States. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a funny image macro Charcoal Cutsy graphics Woodblock painting Cyber folk
ChatGPT: Charcoal

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air quality in Hickory, North Carolina and Number of active magazines in the United States, in the following situation: The cleaner air in Hickory led to a surge in productivity at the local magazine printing factory, creating more jobs and demand for active magazines nationwide. You could say it really breathed new life into the industry!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Hickory, North Carolina, the air is clear and fresh, with blue skies stretching over the town. A large, modern magazine printing factory stands tall amidst the green landscape. Smokestacks are absent, and the air carries no hint of pollution. The factory hums with activity as workers are bustling about, loading fresh paper into the machines. The magazines produced here are shipped out across the country, with demand soaring. The air quality has truly breathed new life into the industry, leading to increased productivity, more jobs, and a surge in the number of active magazines nationwide.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Charcoal ] and depicting this scene: In Hickory, North Carolina, the air is clear and fresh, with blue skies stretching over the town. A large, modern magazine printing factory stands tall amidst the green landscape. Smokestacks are absent, and the air carries no hint of pollution. The factory hums with activity as workers are bustling about, loading fresh paper into the machines. The magazines produced here are shipped out across the country, with demand soaring. The air quality has truly breathed new life into the industry, leading to increased productivity, more jobs, and a surge in the number of active magazines nationwide. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Create an image in the style of charcoal depicting a serene landscape in Hickory, North Carolina. Within the landscape, a modern magazine printing factory is prominently featured, with clear blue skies above. The absence of smokestacks and pollution is notable. The workers inside the factory are busily engaged in loading fresh paper into the machines. The surrounding greenery adds to the tranquil scene, with no signs of pollution in the air. The image should capture the sense of new life and increased productivity in the magazine industry brought about by the fresh air quality.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
^{Show prompt for explanation} Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air quality in Hickory, North Carolina caused Number of active magazines in the United States to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)

Air Quality in Hickory, North Carolina: A Breath of Fresh Air for the Magazine Industry?

The Journal of Environmental Satire

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!

^{Show prompt used to generate this paper} Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Hickory, North Carolina and Number of active magazines in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Quality in Hickory, North Carolina: A Breath of Fresh Air for the Magazine Industry?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we examine the seemingly uncharted territory of the connection between air quality in Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, we delve into the air quality measurements of Hickory and their potential impact on the publishing world. Our analysis reveals a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9339388 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from 2002 to 2016, suggesting a compelling relationship. We explore the possibility that clean air may breathe new life into the magazine industry, creating opportunities for fresh perspectives and unpolluted inspiration. This study not only provides a statistical insight into environmental and economic dynamics but also challenges us to consider the airy implications for creative industries.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The bustling world of magazine publishing has long been a source of information, entertainment, and questionable fashion advice for the masses. With the rise of digital media and the ubiquity of smartphones, one might speculate that the era of printed magazines is as outdated as a flip phone at a tech conference. However, the intertwining of seemingly unrelated factors often reveals unexpected connections, much like discovering that your elderly neighbor is a secret speed skater in retirement.
In this paper, we turn our attention to the air quality of Hickory, North Carolina, a quaint town nestled in the bosom of the Tar Heel State. Hickory, known for its rich heritage in furniture manufacturing and its famous annual furniture festival, has also drawn our interest due to its air quality. While the phrase "quality of air" may conjure images of picturesque meadows and glistening waterfalls, the reality is often more akin to sulfuric scents and the occasional dust devil.
Nevertheless, in our aforementioned groundbreaking study, we seek to unravel the potential impact of Hickory's air quality on the number of active magazines in the United States. Yes, you read it correctly - we are venturing into uncharted territory by exploring the interface of environmental pollutants and glossy pages. It's a bit like finding out that a grizzly bear enjoys a spot of tea with his honey, it's unexpected and intriguing at the same time.
As we enter this unexplored terrain, we aim to challenge the assumption that economic and environmental factors exist in separate spheres, akin to the belief that socks have an inherent desire to mysteriously disappear in the laundry. Our analysis, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, exposes a correlation coefficient of 0.9339388 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from 2002 to 2016. These findings hint at a potentially titanic revelation – that the air we breathe may subtly influence the themes, quality, and marketability of the magazines at our fingertips, much like how a sunny day can affect one's affinity for a good pun.
So, dear reader, join us on this whimsical journey through data, statistics, and unexpected discoveries. Together, we shall unravel the enchanting tale of air quality in Hickory, North Carolina, and its potentially buoyant impact on the world of magazine publishing. Just when we thought the Great Smoky Mountains had all the monopoly on captivating stories, Hickory steps in as an unlikely protagonist in this tale – as surprising as finding a donut in a salad bar.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "The Effect of Environmental Factors on Economic Industries" by Smith et al., the authors find that environmental conditions can have a significant impact on various economic sectors. While the study focuses primarily on larger metropolitan areas, its findings prompt us to consider the potential implications for more geographically specific industries, such as the interplay between air quality in small towns and niche markets. In a similar vein, Doe's "Air Pollution and Its Unintended Effects" delves into the far-reaching consequences of air pollution, shedding light on the intricate web of connections between environmental variables and unexpected outcomes.

Turning to the book "Furniture Manufacturing in the American South" by Jones, we gain valuable insights into the industrial landscape of Hickory, North Carolina. The town's historical prominence in furniture production provides a compelling backdrop for our exploration of environmental influences on local economic activities. Furthermore, "The Rise and Fall of Print Media" by White and "Digital Revolution: A Story of Modern Publishing" by Black offer pertinent perspectives on the evolving magazine industry, laying the foundation for our analysis of how air quality might intersect with the print media landscape.

While the aforementioned literature forms the basis of our investigation, we also draw inspiration from unexpected sources. Works of fiction, such as "Silent Whispers of the Wind" by A.eron S.tark, "Misty Pages of Change" by I.ma B.reezy, and "The Breath of Fresh Air Chronicles" by P.olly E.ster, provide whimsical reflections on the ethereal nature of environmental influences, reminding us that even in the world of academia, a touch of creativity can breathe life into our studies.

In the spirit of light-hearted exploration, we must also acknowledge the unconventional methods we employed in our literature review. In addition to scholarly articles and books, our investigation led us to peruse the back of shampoo bottles, where we stumbled upon enlightening musings about the virtues of pristine air for luscious hair. While not a conventional source of academic insight, we found these unconventional literary tidbits to be strangely invigorating, much like a lungful of fresh country air on a sunny day.

As we navigate the scholarly realm of environmental dynamics and economic influences, we do so with a playful curiosity, pausing to appreciate the unexpected connections and whimsical detours that enrich our intellectual odyssey. Let us now embark on the fanciful journey of analyzing air quality in Hickory, North Carolina, and its potential impact on the vivid tapestry of magazine publishing - a journey that promises to be as surprising as finding a unicorn in a field of daisies.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Hickory, North Carolina and Number of active magazines in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor . You used data from 2002 to 2016

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Quality in Hickory, North Carolina: A Breath of Fresh Air for the Magazine Industry?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we examine the seemingly uncharted territory of the connection between air quality in Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, we delve into the air quality measurements of Hickory and their potential impact on the publishing world. Our analysis reveals a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9339388 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from 2002 to 2016, suggesting a compelling relationship. We explore the possibility that clean air may breathe new life into the magazine industry, creating opportunities for fresh perspectives and unpolluted inspiration. This study not only provides a statistical insight into environmental and economic dynamics but also challenges us to consider the airy implications for creative industries.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The bustling world of magazine publishing has long been a source of information, entertainment, and questionable fashion advice for the masses. With the rise of digital media and the ubiquity of smartphones, one might speculate that the era of printed magazines is as outdated as a flip phone at a tech conference. However, the intertwining of seemingly unrelated factors often reveals unexpected connections, much like discovering that your elderly neighbor is a secret speed skater in retirement.
In this paper, we turn our attention to the air quality of Hickory, North Carolina, a quaint town nestled in the bosom of the Tar Heel State. Hickory, known for its rich heritage in furniture manufacturing and its famous annual furniture festival, has also drawn our interest due to its air quality. While the phrase "quality of air" may conjure images of picturesque meadows and glistening waterfalls, the reality is often more akin to sulfuric scents and the occasional dust devil.
Nevertheless, in our aforementioned groundbreaking study, we seek to unravel the potential impact of Hickory's air quality on the number of active magazines in the United States. Yes, you read it correctly - we are venturing into uncharted territory by exploring the interface of environmental pollutants and glossy pages. It's a bit like finding out that a grizzly bear enjoys a spot of tea with his honey, it's unexpected and intriguing at the same time.
As we enter this unexplored terrain, we aim to challenge the assumption that economic and environmental factors exist in separate spheres, akin to the belief that socks have an inherent desire to mysteriously disappear in the laundry. Our analysis, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, exposes a correlation coefficient of 0.9339388 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from 2002 to 2016. These findings hint at a potentially titanic revelation – that the air we breathe may subtly influence the themes, quality, and marketability of the magazines at our fingertips, much like how a sunny day can affect one's affinity for a good pun.
So, dear reader, join us on this whimsical journey through data, statistics, and unexpected discoveries. Together, we shall unravel the enchanting tale of air quality in Hickory, North Carolina, and its potentially buoyant impact on the world of magazine publishing. Just when we thought the Great Smoky Mountains had all the monopoly on captivating stories, Hickory steps in as an unlikely protagonist in this tale – as surprising as finding a donut in a salad bar.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the enigmatic link between air quality in Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States, our research employed a mixed-methods approach that embraced both quantitative and qualitative analysis. We dived into the depths of data provided by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Stat Investor, holding our breath against the metaphorical smog of ambiguity as we sought clarity in our quest.

Quantitative Analysis:
In our quantitative analysis, we scooped up air quality data from the EPA's air quality monitoring stations in and around Hickory, North Carolina, utilizing measurements of common pollutants such as carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and particulate matter. We then engaged in a meticulous dance with statistical software, performing correlation and regression analyses to scrutinize the relationship between air quality and the number of active magazines.

Qualitative Analysis:
Beyond the numbers and equations, we embarked on a qualitative exploration to encapsulate the essence of the publishing industry and its resilience in the face of environmental variables. We scrutinized industry reports, interviews with publishing professionals, and the scuttlebutt from literary cafes and printing presses to discern the nuanced impact of air quality on the creative process and market demand for magazines. It was a journey through the fragrant fields of literature and the haze of environmental impact assessments – a dichotomy as captivating as witnessing a high-stakes board meeting in a field of daisies.

Data Validation and Refinement:
As is customary in scientific endeavors, we navigated the treacherous waters of data validation and refinement, ensuring the accuracy and reliability of our findings. Our team meticulously cross-referenced the EPA's air quality data with satellite imagery, weather conditions, and the migratory patterns of wayward butterflies to corroborate the veracity of the air quality measurements. Additionally, we extracted the number of active magazines in the United States from the annals of publishing databases, employing an arduous process involving relentless clicking on digital spreadsheets and engaging in prolonged negotiations with reluctant databases.

Temporal Considerations:
The temporal dimension of our research merits attention, as we traversed the chronological landscape from 2002 to 2016. This timeframe enabled us to capture the ebbs and flows of both air quality variations and the tumultuous evolution of the magazine industry, akin to observing the oscillating rhythms of a dramatic opera performance.

Statistical Robustness:
The statistical robustness of our analysis sings harmoniously with the scientific symphony of this study. We conducted sensitivity analyses, robustness checks, and stern glares at covariance matrices to fortify the integrity of our findings, all the while maintaining a vigilant lookout for statistical gremlins attempting to tamper with our precious results.

In summary, our methodology was akin to navigating a whimsical maze, extracting data like precious gems hidden in the labyrinth of digitized archives, all while embracing the seriousness of statistical analyses and the capricious nature of qualitative investigations. Our approach aimed to capture the magical intersection of environmental phenomena and the literary world, akin to a serendipitous encounter between a philosopher and a balloon artist at a local fair.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Hickory, North Carolina and Number of active magazines in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor .

For the time period 2002 to 2016, you found a correlation 0.9339388, r-squared of 0.8722418, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Quality in Hickory, North Carolina: A Breath of Fresh Air for the Magazine Industry?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we examine the seemingly uncharted territory of the connection between air quality in Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, we delve into the air quality measurements of Hickory and their potential impact on the publishing world. Our analysis reveals a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9339388 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from 2002 to 2016, suggesting a compelling relationship. We explore the possibility that clean air may breathe new life into the magazine industry, creating opportunities for fresh perspectives and unpolluted inspiration. This study not only provides a statistical insight into environmental and economic dynamics but also challenges us to consider the airy implications for creative industries.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
The bustling world of magazine publishing has long been a source of information, entertainment, and questionable fashion advice for the masses. With the rise of digital media and the ubiquity of smartphones, one might speculate that the era of printed magazines is as outdated as a flip phone at a tech conference. However, the intertwining of seemingly unrelated factors often reveals unexpected connections, much like discovering that your elderly neighbor is a secret speed skater in retirement.
In this paper, we turn our attention to the air quality of Hickory, North Carolina, a quaint town nestled in the bosom of the Tar Heel State. Hickory, known for its rich heritage in furniture manufacturing and its famous annual furniture festival, has also drawn our interest due to its air quality. While the phrase "quality of air" may conjure images of picturesque meadows and glistening waterfalls, the reality is often more akin to sulfuric scents and the occasional dust devil.
Nevertheless, in our aforementioned groundbreaking study, we seek to unravel the potential impact of Hickory's air quality on the number of active magazines in the United States. Yes, you read it correctly - we are venturing into uncharted territory by exploring the interface of environmental pollutants and glossy pages. It's a bit like finding out that a grizzly bear enjoys a spot of tea with his honey, it's unexpected and intriguing at the same time.
As we enter this unexplored terrain, we aim to challenge the assumption that economic and environmental factors exist in separate spheres, akin to the belief that socks have an inherent desire to mysteriously disappear in the laundry. Our analysis, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, exposes a correlation coefficient of 0.9339388 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from 2002 to 2016. These findings hint at a potentially titanic revelation – that the air we breathe may subtly influence the themes, quality, and marketability of the magazines at our fingertips, much like how a sunny day can affect one's affinity for a good pun.
So, dear reader, join us on this whimsical journey through data, statistics, and unexpected discoveries. Together, we shall unravel the enchanting tale of air quality in Hickory, North Carolina, and its potentially buoyant impact on the world of magazine publishing. Just when we thought the Great Smoky Mountains had all the monopoly on captivating stories, Hickory steps in as an unlikely protagonist in this tale – as surprising as finding a donut in a salad bar.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]

ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

During the period of 2002 to 2016, our analysis uncovered a remarkably strong correlation between the air quality in Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. The correlation coefficient of 0.9339388 suggests a nearly perfect positive linear relationship between the two variables. It's as if the air in Hickory was whispering sweet nothings into the ears of magazine publishers across the nation, inspiring them to keep printing and keep reading.

Our findings are further reinforced by an r-squared value of 0.8722418, indicating that a whopping 87.22% of the variation in the number of active magazines can be explained by changes in air quality. This is nearly as impressive as finding a unicorn in a hay bale - quite unexpected, yet undeniably magical.

Furthermore, with a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently reject the null hypothesis and assert that the correlation we observed is not just a result of chance. It's as statistically significant as finding a four-leaf clover in a field of three-leaf clovers.

To visually encapsulate this breathtaking connection, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the robust positive relationship between air quality in Hickory and the number of active magazines in the United States. The steep slope of the scatterplot is as striking as a mountain goat scaling the Alps, emphasizing the compelling nature of this association. It's almost like seeing a DIY project gone right – unexpected and oddly satisfying.

In summary, our results suggest that the air in Hickory, North Carolina, may have wielded a profound influence on the magazine industry across the United States. The implications of this unearthed correlation are as thought-provoking as they are unexpected, challenging conventional wisdom and inspiring us to consider the atmospheric influences on creative enterprises. This study sheds light on the whimsical interplay between environmental factors and economic outcomes, urging us to contemplate the airy possibilities for innovation and artistic expression. Just when we thought the skies were the limit, Hickory's air quality swoops in as a surprising catalyst for magazine market dynamics.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Hickory, North Carolina and Number of active magazines in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Air Quality in Hickory, North Carolina: A Breath of Fresh Air for the Magazine Industry?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we examine the seemingly uncharted territory of the connection between air quality in Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, we delve into the air quality measurements of Hickory and their potential impact on the publishing world. Our analysis reveals a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9339388 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from 2002 to 2016, suggesting a compelling relationship. We explore the possibility that clean air may breathe new life into the magazine industry, creating opportunities for fresh perspectives and unpolluted inspiration. This study not only provides a statistical insight into environmental and economic dynamics but also challenges us to consider the airy implications for creative industries.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Effect of Environmental Factors on Economic Industries" by Smith et al., the authors find that environmental conditions can have a significant impact on various economic sectors. While the study focuses primarily on larger metropolitan areas, its findings prompt us to consider the potential implications for more geographically specific industries, such as the interplay between air quality in small towns and niche markets. In a similar vein, Doe's "Air Pollution and Its Unintended Effects" delves into the far-reaching consequences of air pollution, shedding light on the intricate web of connections between environmental variables and unexpected outcomes.
Turning to the book "Furniture Manufacturing in the American South" by Jones, we gain valuable insights into the industrial landscape of Hickory, North Carolina. The town's historical prominence in furniture production provides a compelling backdrop for our exploration of environmental influences on local economic activities. Furthermore, "The Rise and Fall of Print Media" by White and "Digital Revolution: A Story of Modern Publishing" by Black offer pertinent perspectives on the evolving magazine industry, laying the foundation for our analysis of how air quality might intersect with the print media landscape.
While the aforementioned literature forms the basis of our investigation, we also draw inspiration from unexpected sources. Works of fiction, such as "Silent Whispers of the Wind" by A.eron S.tark, "Misty Pages of Change" by I.ma B.reezy, and "The Breath of Fresh Air Chronicles" by P.olly E.ster, provide whimsical reflections on the ethereal nature of environmental influences, reminding us that even in the world of academia, a touch of creativity can breathe life into our studies.
In the spirit of light-hearted exploration, we must also acknowledge the unconventional methods we employed in our literature review. In addition to scholarly articles and books, our investigation led us to peruse the back of shampoo bottles, where we stumbled upon enlightening musings about the virtues of pristine air for luscious hair. While not a conventional source of academic insight, we found these unconventional literary tidbits to be strangely invigorating, much like a lungful of fresh country air on a sunny day.
As we navigate the scholarly realm of environmental dynamics and economic influences, we do so with a playful curiosity, pausing to appreciate the unexpected connections and whimsical detours that enrich our intellectual odyssey. Let us now embark on the fanciful journey of analyzing air quality in Hickory, North Carolina, and its potential impact on the vivid tapestry of magazine publishing - a journey that promises to be as surprising as finding a unicorn in a field of daisies.

[[RESULTS]]
During the period of 2002 to 2016, our analysis uncovered a remarkably strong correlation between the air quality in Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. The correlation coefficient of 0.9339388 suggests a nearly perfect positive linear relationship between the two variables. It's as if the air in Hickory was whispering sweet nothings into the ears of magazine publishers across the nation, inspiring them to keep printing and keep reading.
Our findings are further reinforced by an r-squared value of 0.8722418, indicating that a whopping 87.22% of the variation in the number of active magazines can be explained by changes in air quality. This is nearly as impressive as finding a unicorn in a hay bale - quite unexpected, yet undeniably magical.
Furthermore, with a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently reject the null hypothesis and assert that the correlation we observed is not just a result of chance. It's as statistically significant as finding a four-leaf clover in a field of three-leaf clovers.
To visually encapsulate this breathtaking connection, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the robust positive relationship between air quality in Hickory and the number of active magazines in the United States. The steep slope of the scatterplot is as striking as a mountain goat scaling the Alps, emphasizing the compelling nature of this association. It's almost like seeing a DIY project gone right – unexpected and oddly satisfying.
In summary, our results suggest that the air in Hickory, North Carolina, may have wielded a profound influence on the magazine industry across the United States. The implications of this unearthed correlation are as thought-provoking as they are unexpected, challenging conventional wisdom and inspiring us to consider the atmospheric influences on creative enterprises. This study sheds light on the whimsical interplay between environmental factors and economic outcomes, urging us to contemplate the airy possibilities for innovation and artistic expression. Just when we thought the skies were the limit, Hickory's air quality swoops in as a surprising catalyst for magazine market dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings provide substantial evidence to support the hypothesis that there exists a robust correlation between air quality in Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. It appears that the ethereal essence of Hickory's air has not only provided solace to nature enthusiasts but has also served as a breath of fresh inspiration for the publishing realm. Our results align with previous research on the influence of environmental factors on economic industries, reinforcing the notion that fresh air is not only vital for healthy lungs but also for the creative vigor of the publishing world.

Building upon the works of Smith et al. and Doe, our study brings to the forefront the specific influence of localized air quality on a niche market. Hickory, known for its historical significance in furniture manufacturing, now emerges as a potential hotspot for pondering the interplay between air quality and the publishing industry. In doing so, we echo the sentiment expressed by A.eron S.tark in "Silent Whispers of the Wind" and I.ma B.reezy in "Misty Pages of Change," while our findings are reinforced by P.olly E.ster's "The Breath of Fresh Air Chronicles," providing a lively narrative of the potential impact of clean air on creative outputs.

Additionally, our results resonate with the unexpected literary insights found on the back of shampoo bottles, as even the most unconventional sources have hinted at the invigorating qualities of pristine air. While we tread the scholarly path, we do not discount the unanticipated inspirations that elevate our understanding, much like a surprising discovery of a unicorn amidst the academic dalliances.

Soaring beyond the serendipitous, the statistical rigor of our findings, symbolized by the nearly perfect correlation coefficient and the substantial explained variation denoted by the r-squared value, further substantiates the substantial relationship between air quality in Hickory and the number of active magazines. This robust evidence is as convincing as the sight of a four-leaf clover in a field of three-leaf clovers, underscoring the statistical significance of our results.

In closing, our study sheds light on how the seemingly whimsical elements of air quality in a small town can weave into the economic fabric of an entire industry. As we contemplate the airy implications for innovation and creativity, we marvel at the unexpected yet undeniably magical connection between Hickory's air quality and the magazine market dynamics. This study opens a window to the playful curiosity and fanciful surprises that enrich our scholarly voyages, reminding us that even the most unconventional findings can breathe life into our intellectual quests.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Hickory, North Carolina and Number of active magazines in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Air Quality in Hickory, North Carolina: A Breath of Fresh Air for the Magazine Industry?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we examine the seemingly uncharted territory of the connection between air quality in Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, we delve into the air quality measurements of Hickory and their potential impact on the publishing world. Our analysis reveals a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9339388 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from 2002 to 2016, suggesting a compelling relationship. We explore the possibility that clean air may breathe new life into the magazine industry, creating opportunities for fresh perspectives and unpolluted inspiration. This study not only provides a statistical insight into environmental and economic dynamics but also challenges us to consider the airy implications for creative industries.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
The bustling world of magazine publishing has long been a source of information, entertainment, and questionable fashion advice for the masses. With the rise of digital media and the ubiquity of smartphones, one might speculate that the era of printed magazines is as outdated as a flip phone at a tech conference. However, the intertwining of seemingly unrelated factors often reveals unexpected connections, much like discovering that your elderly neighbor is a secret speed skater in retirement.
In this paper, we turn our attention to the air quality of Hickory, North Carolina, a quaint town nestled in the bosom of the Tar Heel State. Hickory, known for its rich heritage in furniture manufacturing and its famous annual furniture festival, has also drawn our interest due to its air quality. While the phrase "quality of air" may conjure images of picturesque meadows and glistening waterfalls, the reality is often more akin to sulfuric scents and the occasional dust devil.
Nevertheless, in our aforementioned groundbreaking study, we seek to unravel the potential impact of Hickory's air quality on the number of active magazines in the United States. Yes, you read it correctly - we are venturing into uncharted territory by exploring the interface of environmental pollutants and glossy pages. It's a bit like finding out that a grizzly bear enjoys a spot of tea with his honey, it's unexpected and intriguing at the same time.
As we enter this unexplored terrain, we aim to challenge the assumption that economic and environmental factors exist in separate spheres, akin to the belief that socks have an inherent desire to mysteriously disappear in the laundry. Our analysis, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, exposes a correlation coefficient of 0.9339388 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from 2002 to 2016. These findings hint at a potentially titanic revelation – that the air we breathe may subtly influence the themes, quality, and marketability of the magazines at our fingertips, much like how a sunny day can affect one's affinity for a good pun.
So, dear reader, join us on this whimsical journey through data, statistics, and unexpected discoveries. Together, we shall unravel the enchanting tale of air quality in Hickory, North Carolina, and its potentially buoyant impact on the world of magazine publishing. Just when we thought the Great Smoky Mountains had all the monopoly on captivating stories, Hickory steps in as an unlikely protagonist in this tale – as surprising as finding a donut in a salad bar.

[[RESULTS]]
During the period of 2002 to 2016, our analysis uncovered a remarkably strong correlation between the air quality in Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. The correlation coefficient of 0.9339388 suggests a nearly perfect positive linear relationship between the two variables. It's as if the air in Hickory was whispering sweet nothings into the ears of magazine publishers across the nation, inspiring them to keep printing and keep reading.
Our findings are further reinforced by an r-squared value of 0.8722418, indicating that a whopping 87.22% of the variation in the number of active magazines can be explained by changes in air quality. This is nearly as impressive as finding a unicorn in a hay bale - quite unexpected, yet undeniably magical.
Furthermore, with a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently reject the null hypothesis and assert that the correlation we observed is not just a result of chance. It's as statistically significant as finding a four-leaf clover in a field of three-leaf clovers.
To visually encapsulate this breathtaking connection, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the robust positive relationship between air quality in Hickory and the number of active magazines in the United States. The steep slope of the scatterplot is as striking as a mountain goat scaling the Alps, emphasizing the compelling nature of this association. It's almost like seeing a DIY project gone right – unexpected and oddly satisfying.
In summary, our results suggest that the air in Hickory, North Carolina, may have wielded a profound influence on the magazine industry across the United States. The implications of this unearthed correlation are as thought-provoking as they are unexpected, challenging conventional wisdom and inspiring us to consider the atmospheric influences on creative enterprises. This study sheds light on the whimsical interplay between environmental factors and economic outcomes, urging us to contemplate the airy possibilities for innovation and artistic expression. Just when we thought the skies were the limit, Hickory's air quality swoops in as a surprising catalyst for magazine market dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In our exploration of the correlation between air quality in Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States, we have uncovered a connection as tantalizing as finding a pizza delivery menu in an old book – unexpected yet strangely fitting. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9339388 and the r-squared value of 0.8722418 emphasize the compelling influence of Hickory's atmosphere on the magazine market, as surprising as discovering a banana in a fruit salad.

The statistically significant relationship we've unveiled is as eye-opening as finding a treasure map in a dusty attic – it challenges traditional assumptions and expands our understanding of environmental and economic dynamics. The scatterplot vividly capturing this association is as visually striking as witnessing a rainbow on a gloomy day, reminding us of the colorful interplay between seemingly unrelated variables.

Our findings beckon us to consider the airy implications for creative industries, much like stumbling upon a delightful surprise in an Easter egg hunt. This study not only sheds light on the unexpected connections in our world but also prompts us to reimagine the whimsical interplay between environmental elements and the publishing realm.

In conclusion, our research suggests that the air in Hickory, North Carolina, may have breathed new life into the magazine industry, as surprising as finding a diamond ring in a sandbox. We assert that further research in this area is as unnecessary as a third nostril – our findings speak volumes and stand as a testament to the enchanting and quirky discoveries that lie in the intersection of environmental and economic influences.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Air Quality in Hickory, North Carolina: A Breath of Fresh Air for the Magazine Industry?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Environmental Satire

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Air Quality in Hickory, North Carolina: A Breath of Fresh Air for the Magazine Industry?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Small Town Sustainability and Media Studies

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Air Quality in Hickory, North Carolina: A Breath of Fresh Air for the Magazine Industry? with an abstract of In this groundbreaking study, we examine the seemingly uncharted territory of the connection between air quality in Hickory, North Carolina, and the number of active magazines in the United States. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Stat Investor, we delve into the air quality measurements of Hickory and their potential impact on the publishing world. Our analysis reveals a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9339388 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from 2002 to 2016, suggesting a compelling relationship. We explore the possibility that clean air may breathe new life into the magazine industry, creating opportunities for fresh perspectives and unpolluted inspiration. This study not only provides a statistical insight into environmental and economic dynamics but also challenges us to consider the airy implications for creative industries.

ChatGPT:

Air quality, Hickory, North Carolina, magazine industry, Environmental Protection Agency, Stat Investor, correlation coefficient, significance level, publishing world, economic dynamics, creative industries, pollution impact, clean air, environmental impact

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.

Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error

Data details

Air quality in Hickory, North Carolina
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with good or moderate air quality in Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air quality in Hickory, North Carolina

Number of active magazines in the United States
Source: Stat Investor
See what else correlates with Number of active magazines in the United States

Correlation r = 0.9339388 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r² = 0.8722418 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 87.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Number of active magazines in the United States) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air quality in Hickory, North Carolina) over the 15 years from 2002 through 2016.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.6E-7.^Show 0.0000003578321969183003300000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme.^Note More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 3.6E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,794,606 random variables^Note You don't actually need 2 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, ^Note Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.81, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
^{Read more about the confidence interval} The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!

All values for the years included above: ^Note If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.

	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016
Air quality in Hickory, North Carolina (Good air quality)	0.798479	0.920152	0.973585	0.940298	0.952778	0.920548	0.967213	1	0.980769	0.991781	0.994521	1	1	1	0.991803
Number of active magazines in the United States (Magazines)	5340	6234	7188	6325	6734	6809	7383	7110	7163	7179	7390	7240	7289	7293	7216

Why this works

Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
Lack of causal connection: There is probably^Note Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple^Note Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.

Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. ^{Show the steps to do this.} Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."

# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.798479,0.920152,0.973585,0.940298,0.952778,0.920548,0.967213,1,0.980769,0.991781,0.994521,1,1,1,0.991803,])
array_2 = np.array([5340,6234,7188,6325,6734,6809,7383,7110,7163,7179,7390,7240,7289,7293,7216,])
array_1_name = "Air quality in Hickory, North Carolina"
array_2_name = "Number of active magazines in the United States"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)

Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. ^Note Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:

High resolution line chart ^Note The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.

If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.

Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape.
High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
Alternative high resolution line chart
Scatterplot
Portable line chart (png)
Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
Line chart for only Air quality in Hickory, North Carolina
Line chart for only Number of active magazines in the United States
AI-generated correlation image
The spurious research paper: Air Quality in Hickory, North Carolina: A Breath of Fresh Air for the Magazine Industry?

View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!

Correlation ID: 5706 · Black Variable ID: 21548 · Red Variable ID: 382


Problem variable:
Issue:
Additional details: Optional
Confirm you are a human: