Download png, svg
AI explanation
The more Mercedes-Benz cars get recalled, the more 'auto-motivated' CGP Grey becomes to create click-worthy content. It's like the cars are saying, "Hey, we may have some faulty airbags, but at least we're driving up those YouTube views!"Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a pop art style scene with a row of vibrant-colored, sleek Mercedes-Benz cars lining up in a bustling parking lot. Each car's hood is open, and mechanics are diligently working on them, adding a dynamic touch to the scene. Above the cars, a large digital screen showcases CGP Grey's YouTube channel, with attention-grabbing titles and thumbnails, emanating a bold and eye-catching aura. The cars possess an air of pride and confidence as they appear to collectively generate buzz for the channel, creating a visually captivating and engaging moment. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How clickbait-y CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Magic realism Cyberpunk Magic realism Pop art Data cyber art
ChatGPT: Pop art
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How clickbait-y CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, in the following situation: The more Mercedes-Benz cars get recalled, the more 'auto-motivated' CGP Grey becomes to create click-worthy content. It's like the cars are saying, "Hey, we may have some faulty airbags, but at least we're driving up those YouTube views!". Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, a row of sleek Mercedes-Benz cars are lining up in a parking lot, with the hoods open as mechanics work on them. Above the cars, a large digital screen displays CGP Grey's YouTube channel with flashy, attention-grabbing titles and thumbnails. The cars seem to be looking up at the screen proudly as if they are generating the buzz for the channel.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Pop art ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, a row of sleek Mercedes-Benz cars are lining up in a parking lot, with the hoods open as mechanics work on them. Above the cars, a large digital screen displays CGP Grey's YouTube channel with flashy, attention-grabbing titles and thumbnails. The cars seem to be looking up at the screen proudly as if they are generating the buzz for the channel. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a pop art style scene with a row of vibrant-colored, sleek Mercedes-Benz cars lining up in a bustling parking lot. Each car's hood is open, and mechanics are diligently working on them, adding a dynamic touch to the scene. Above the cars, a large digital screen showcases CGP Grey's YouTube channel, with attention-grabbing titles and thumbnails, emanating a bold and eye-catching aura. The cars possess an air of pride and confidence as they appear to collectively generate buzz for the channel, creating a visually captivating and engaging moment.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in How clickbait-y CGP Grey YouTube video titles are caused Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA to increase. Include one good pun.
AI academic paper
Clickbait Capers and Car Complications: Correlating CGP Grey's Catchy YouTube Titles with Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls International Journal of Internet Influence and Automotive Analysis Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title an alliteration.
Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9080681 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Clickbait Capers and Car Complications: Correlating CGP Grey's Catchy YouTube Titles with Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the often-ignored relationship between the captivating clickbait-y titles of CGP Grey's YouTube videos and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Through the use of advanced AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data gathered from the US Department of Transportation, our research team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9080681 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning 2011 to 2022. The findings of this study shed light on the intriguing connection between the art of crafting catchy titles and the rather unexciting world of automotive recalls. As we delve into this unforeseen correlation, we present a compendium of puns, jokes, and unexpected twists as we navigate through the intricacies of clickbait and automotive safety.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Clickbait Capers and Car Complications: Correlating CGP Grey's Catchy YouTube Titles with Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the often-ignored relationship between the captivating clickbait-y titles of CGP Grey's YouTube videos and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Through the use of advanced AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data gathered from the US Department of Transportation, our research team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9080681 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning 2011 to 2022. The findings of this study shed light on the intriguing connection between the art of crafting catchy titles and the rather unexciting world of automotive recalls. As we delve into this unforeseen correlation, we present a compendium of puns, jokes, and unexpected twists as we navigate through the intricacies of clickbait and automotive safety.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
**[[INTRODUCTION]]**
Cultural critics have long lamented the rise of clickbait-y content, with its irresistible allure and promise of instant gratification. Meanwhile, the realm of automotive recalls typically lacks the glitz and glamour of viral Internet sensations. Yet, in a surprising twist, our research delves into the curious entanglement of these seemingly disparate domains. We sought to unravel the tangled web of influence between the attention-grabbing YouTube video titles of CGP Grey and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA.
In this paper, we present a fusion of statistical analysis and tongue-in-cheek commentary to elucidate the correlation between clickbait-y titles and automotive safety. As we embark on this quixotic journey, we invite the reader to hop aboard the statistical rollercoaster and prepare for a wild ride through the realms of data, puns, and unexpected revelations.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Clickbait Capers and Car Complications: Correlating CGP Grey's Catchy YouTube Titles with Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the often-ignored relationship between the captivating clickbait-y titles of CGP Grey's YouTube videos and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Through the use of advanced AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data gathered from the US Department of Transportation, our research team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9080681 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning 2011 to 2022. The findings of this study shed light on the intriguing connection between the art of crafting catchy titles and the rather unexciting world of automotive recalls. As we delve into this unforeseen correlation, we present a compendium of puns, jokes, and unexpected twists as we navigate through the intricacies of clickbait and automotive safety.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Cultural critics have long lamented the rise of clickbait-y content, with its irresistible allure and promise of instant gratification. Meanwhile, the realm of automotive recalls typically lacks the glitz and glamour of viral Internet sensations. Yet, in a surprising twist, our research delves into the curious entanglement of these seemingly disparate domains. We sought to unravel the tangled web of influence between the attention-grabbing YouTube video titles of CGP Grey and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA.
In this paper, we present a fusion of statistical analysis and tongue-in-cheek commentary to elucidate the correlation between clickbait-y titles and automotive safety. As we embark on this quixotic journey, we invite the reader to hop aboard the statistical rollercoaster and prepare for a wild ride through the realms of data, puns, and unexpected revelations.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previous research has primarily focused on the impact of clickbait-y content on user engagement and the psychological mechanisms underlying the allure of sensationalist titles. Smith et al. (2017) conducted a comprehensive study examining the persuasive techniques utilized in clickbait headlines, while Doe (2019) delved into the cognitive processes that drive individuals to click on tantalizing video titles. Furthermore, Jones (2020) explored the overarching implications of clickbait culture on online media consumption behaviors.
Shifting the focus to automotive recalls, Lorem and Ipsum (2018) provided a detailed analysis of the factors contributing to vehicle safety defects and subsequent recall campaigns in the United States. Their work highlighted the critical role of proactive surveillance and risk assessment in mitigating potential hazards associated with automotive manufacturing.
In the context of our study, these conventional perspectives serve as a springboard for investigating the nuanced interplay between CGP Grey's clickbait-y YouTube video titles and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. The unexpected synthesis of disparate topics offers a fresh vantage point for our research endeavors, prompting a departure from the customary scholarly discourse into uncharted territories of inquiry.
Drawing parallels to our investigation, "The Art of Seduction: How to Craft Irresistible Titles" by Robert Greene and "In the Blink of an Eye: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking" by Malcolm Gladwell provide insights into the subconscious triggers and emotional appeals embedded within captivating titles, albeit in contexts unrelated to automotive safety.
On the fictional front, "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown and "Crash" by J.G. Ballard present narratives intertwining suspenseful plotlines with automotive themes, albeit lacking a direct linkage to our research focus.
Additionally, we draw upon unconventional sources such as "Scooby-Doo" episodes and "The Magic School Bus" series, as we explore the whimsical dimensions of content engagement and safety-related conundrums. The juxtaposition of these seemingly incongruous inputs underscores the eclectic nature of our research pursuit, underscoring the paradoxical blend of scholarly rigor and whimsical reverie.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and US DOT . You used data from 2011 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Clickbait Capers and Car Complications: Correlating CGP Grey's Catchy YouTube Titles with Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the often-ignored relationship between the captivating clickbait-y titles of CGP Grey's YouTube videos and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Through the use of advanced AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data gathered from the US Department of Transportation, our research team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9080681 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning 2011 to 2022. The findings of this study shed light on the intriguing connection between the art of crafting catchy titles and the rather unexciting world of automotive recalls. As we delve into this unforeseen correlation, we present a compendium of puns, jokes, and unexpected twists as we navigate through the intricacies of clickbait and automotive safety.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Cultural critics have long lamented the rise of clickbait-y content, with its irresistible allure and promise of instant gratification. Meanwhile, the realm of automotive recalls typically lacks the glitz and glamour of viral Internet sensations. Yet, in a surprising twist, our research delves into the curious entanglement of these seemingly disparate domains. We sought to unravel the tangled web of influence between the attention-grabbing YouTube video titles of CGP Grey and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA.
In this paper, we present a fusion of statistical analysis and tongue-in-cheek commentary to elucidate the correlation between clickbait-y titles and automotive safety. As we embark on this quixotic journey, we invite the reader to hop aboard the statistical rollercoaster and prepare for a wild ride through the realms of data, puns, and unexpected revelations.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In order to investigate the potential relationship between clickbait-y CGP Grey YouTube video titles and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, our research team employed a multi-faceted approach that combined advanced AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data extraction from the US Department of Transportation (DOT) database.
Firstly, we developed a bespoke AI algorithm to systematically analyze and quantify the clickbait levels of CGP Grey's YouTube video titles. The algorithm utilized a comprehensive range of linguistic and semantic features to assess the clickbait intensity of each title, taking into account factors such as curiosity gap, sensational language, and emotional triggers. This algorithm underwent a rigorous validation process to ensure its accuracy and consistency in capturing the essence of clickbait.
Simultaneously, we gathered data on automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA from the US DOT database spanning the years 2011 to 2022. This dataset encompassed a wide array of variables, including the nature of the recall, the affected vehicle models, the underlying safety concerns, and the timing of the recall announcements. Through meticulous curation and verification, we compiled a robust dataset that served as the foundation for our subsequent analyses.
To explore the potential correlation between CGP Grey's clickbait-y video titles and automotive recalls, we employed advanced statistical methods, including correlation analysis, regression modeling, and time series analysis. These techniques allowed us to quantitatively assess the association between the clickbait intensity of YouTube video titles and the occurrence of automotive recalls, while controlling for relevant confounding variables such as market trends, regulatory changes, and public sentiment towards automotive safety.
Furthermore, to enhance our insights beyond traditional statistical analyses, we conducted textual analyses of both the clickbait-y YouTube video titles and the public discourse surrounding the identified automotive recalls. This qualitative examination aimed to uncover nuanced patterns and thematic connections that may not be fully captured by quantitative measures alone. Through this integrated approach, we sought to provide a comprehensive understanding of the interplay between clickbait content and automotive safety concerns, complementing statistical rigor with contextual richness.
In parallel to our quantitative and qualitative analyses, we leveraged interdisciplinary perspectives from linguistics, psychology, and marketing to delve into the underlying mechanisms that drive the potential influence of clickbait on public perceptions and behavioral responses, examining how these dynamics may intersect with automotive industry dynamics and risk management practices.
Overall, our methodology centered on a fusion of advanced AI algorithms, extensive data curation, interdisciplinary insights, and rigorous statistical analyses, forming a cohesive framework to unravel the entwined narratives of clickbait-y YouTube titles and automotive recalls. Through this methodological concoction, we endeavored to blend scholarly rigor with a dash of whimsy and creativity, mirroring the unexpected juxtaposition of our research domains.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and US DOT .
For the time period 2011 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9080681, r-squared of 0.8245877, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Clickbait Capers and Car Complications: Correlating CGP Grey's Catchy YouTube Titles with Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the often-ignored relationship between the captivating clickbait-y titles of CGP Grey's YouTube videos and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Through the use of advanced AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data gathered from the US Department of Transportation, our research team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9080681 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning 2011 to 2022. The findings of this study shed light on the intriguing connection between the art of crafting catchy titles and the rather unexciting world of automotive recalls. As we delve into this unforeseen correlation, we present a compendium of puns, jokes, and unexpected twists as we navigate through the intricacies of clickbait and automotive safety.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Cultural critics have long lamented the rise of clickbait-y content, with its irresistible allure and promise of instant gratification. Meanwhile, the realm of automotive recalls typically lacks the glitz and glamour of viral Internet sensations. Yet, in a surprising twist, our research delves into the curious entanglement of these seemingly disparate domains. We sought to unravel the tangled web of influence between the attention-grabbing YouTube video titles of CGP Grey and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA.
In this paper, we present a fusion of statistical analysis and tongue-in-cheek commentary to elucidate the correlation between clickbait-y titles and automotive safety. As we embark on this quixotic journey, we invite the reader to hop aboard the statistical rollercoaster and prepare for a wild ride through the realms of data, puns, and unexpected revelations.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the clickbait-y titles of CGP Grey's YouTube videos and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA for the period 2011 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9080681, with an r-squared of 0.8245877, and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggests a robust relationship between these two variables.
In a delightfully unexpected turn of events, it appears that the art of crafting catchy titles and the mundane world of automotive recalls are more intertwined than previously imagined. The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts this surprising association, with data points forming a compelling linear pattern that would capture the attention of even the most discerning clickbait connoisseur.
While we cannot definitively claim a causal relationship between CGP Grey's tantalizing titles and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, our findings prompt a reevaluation of the influence of captivating content on consumer behavior. As we navigate through this terrain of unexpected connections, we invite the reader to buckle up and enjoy the statistical rollercoaster ride that awaits in the discussion section.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Clickbait Capers and Car Complications: Correlating CGP Grey's Catchy YouTube Titles with Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the often-ignored relationship between the captivating clickbait-y titles of CGP Grey's YouTube videos and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Through the use of advanced AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data gathered from the US Department of Transportation, our research team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9080681 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning 2011 to 2022. The findings of this study shed light on the intriguing connection between the art of crafting catchy titles and the rather unexciting world of automotive recalls. As we delve into this unforeseen correlation, we present a compendium of puns, jokes, and unexpected twists as we navigate through the intricacies of clickbait and automotive safety.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previous research has primarily focused on the impact of clickbait-y content on user engagement and the psychological mechanisms underlying the allure of sensationalist titles. Smith et al. (2017) conducted a comprehensive study examining the persuasive techniques utilized in clickbait headlines, while Doe (2019) delved into the cognitive processes that drive individuals to click on tantalizing video titles. Furthermore, Jones (2020) explored the overarching implications of clickbait culture on online media consumption behaviors.
Shifting the focus to automotive recalls, Lorem and Ipsum (2018) provided a detailed analysis of the factors contributing to vehicle safety defects and subsequent recall campaigns in the United States. Their work highlighted the critical role of proactive surveillance and risk assessment in mitigating potential hazards associated with automotive manufacturing.
In the context of our study, these conventional perspectives serve as a springboard for investigating the nuanced interplay between CGP Grey's clickbait-y YouTube video titles and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. The unexpected synthesis of disparate topics offers a fresh vantage point for our research endeavors, prompting a departure from the customary scholarly discourse into uncharted territories of inquiry.
Drawing parallels to our investigation, "The Art of Seduction: How to Craft Irresistible Titles" by Robert Greene and "In the Blink of an Eye: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking" by Malcolm Gladwell provide insights into the subconscious triggers and emotional appeals embedded within captivating titles, albeit in contexts unrelated to automotive safety.
On the fictional front, "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown and "Crash" by J.G. Ballard present narratives intertwining suspenseful plotlines with automotive themes, albeit lacking a direct linkage to our research focus.
Additionally, we draw upon unconventional sources such as "Scooby-Doo" episodes and "The Magic School Bus" series, as we explore the whimsical dimensions of content engagement and safety-related conundrums. The juxtaposition of these seemingly incongruous inputs underscores the eclectic nature of our research pursuit, underscoring the paradoxical blend of scholarly rigor and whimsical reverie.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the clickbait-y titles of CGP Grey's YouTube videos and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA for the period 2011 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9080681, with an r-squared of 0.8245877, and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggests a robust relationship between these two variables.
In a delightfully unexpected turn of events, it appears that the art of crafting catchy titles and the mundane world of automotive recalls are more intertwined than previously imagined. The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts this surprising association, with data points forming a compelling linear pattern that would capture the attention of even the most discerning clickbait connoisseur.
While we cannot definitively claim a causal relationship between CGP Grey's tantalizing titles and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, our findings prompt a reevaluation of the influence of captivating content on consumer behavior. As we navigate through this terrain of unexpected connections, we invite the reader to buckle up and enjoy the statistical rollercoaster ride that awaits in the discussion section.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The results of our study offer compelling evidence for the surprising correlation between the clickbait-y titles of CGP Grey's YouTube videos and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. It appears that the allure of catchy titles may exert a peculiar influence on the occurrence of automotive safety defects, defying conventional wisdom and teasing the boundaries of causation.
Building upon the literature review, the findings of our investigation align with prior research examining the persuasive power of enticing headlines. Much like the captivating narratives of "The Da Vinci Code" and "Crash," CGP Grey's clickbait-y titles seem to captivate audiences and, as it turns out, may also influence automotive safety outcomes. It is indeed a remarkable alignment of consumer psychology and vehicular mishaps, akin to a serendipitous collision of literary intrigue and automotive drama.
Moreover, the unexpected fusion of "Scooby-Doo" episodes and "The Magic School Bus" series, while initially regarded as whimsical reverie, has culminated in a substantiated correlation between clickbait engagement and automotive recalls. This unanticipated connection underscores the multifaceted nature of our research endeavor, where scholarly rigor mingles with playful allusions to childhood favorites.
Our results corroborate Lorem and Ipsum's assertions regarding the critical role of proactive surveillance in identifying safety defects and mitigating potential hazards in the automotive industry. In this vein, the influence of captivating titles on viewership engagement may serve as an unorthodox, yet influential, indicator for the visibility of automotive safety concerns. The statistical relationships unveiled in our study add a layer of intrigue to the conventional methodologies of risk assessment, akin to discovering a hidden subtext within a seemingly mundane narrative.
Lastly, our study emphasizes the necessity for further exploration into the interplay between unconventional variables and seemingly disparate phenomena. The unexpected correlation uncovered in this research underscores the value of adopting a multidisciplinary approach, intertwining the realms of online content engagement with automotive safety considerations. As we navigate this uncharted terrain of inquiry, we invite fellow researchers to join us in unraveling the enigmatic interconnections that may lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated domains.
In sum, our research presents a compelling case for the enthralling relationship between clickbait-y YouTube video titles and automotive recalls, where statistical analyses converge with whimsical reverie to reveal the unexpected interplay of variables.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y CGP Grey YouTube video titles are and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Clickbait Capers and Car Complications: Correlating CGP Grey's Catchy YouTube Titles with Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the often-ignored relationship between the captivating clickbait-y titles of CGP Grey's YouTube videos and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Through the use of advanced AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data gathered from the US Department of Transportation, our research team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9080681 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning 2011 to 2022. The findings of this study shed light on the intriguing connection between the art of crafting catchy titles and the rather unexciting world of automotive recalls. As we delve into this unforeseen correlation, we present a compendium of puns, jokes, and unexpected twists as we navigate through the intricacies of clickbait and automotive safety.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
Cultural critics have long lamented the rise of clickbait-y content, with its irresistible allure and promise of instant gratification. Meanwhile, the realm of automotive recalls typically lacks the glitz and glamour of viral Internet sensations. Yet, in a surprising twist, our research delves into the curious entanglement of these seemingly disparate domains. We sought to unravel the tangled web of influence between the attention-grabbing YouTube video titles of CGP Grey and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA.
In this paper, we present a fusion of statistical analysis and tongue-in-cheek commentary to elucidate the correlation between clickbait-y titles and automotive safety. As we embark on this quixotic journey, we invite the reader to hop aboard the statistical rollercoaster and prepare for a wild ride through the realms of data, puns, and unexpected revelations.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the clickbait-y titles of CGP Grey's YouTube videos and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA for the period 2011 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9080681, with an r-squared of 0.8245877, and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggests a robust relationship between these two variables.
In a delightfully unexpected turn of events, it appears that the art of crafting catchy titles and the mundane world of automotive recalls are more intertwined than previously imagined. The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts this surprising association, with data points forming a compelling linear pattern that would capture the attention of even the most discerning clickbait connoisseur.
While we cannot definitively claim a causal relationship between CGP Grey's tantalizing titles and the automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, our findings prompt a reevaluation of the influence of captivating content on consumer behavior. As we navigate through this terrain of unexpected connections, we invite the reader to buckle up and enjoy the statistical rollercoaster ride that awaits in the discussion section.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our findings have illuminated a fascinating relationship between the tantalizing clickbait-y titles of CGP Grey's YouTube videos and the occurrence of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. It seems that while viewers may be enticed by intriguing video titles, Mercedes-Benz USA vehicles may also be enticed to exhibit issues of their own. This correlation, with a remarkable p-value of less than 0.01, indicates a robust statistical link between these seemingly unrelated worlds.
Our unexpected journey through the data has certainly provided a few twists and turns, much like a suspenseful CGP Grey video. We have uncovered a correlation so strong, it could almost be described as a "revving relationship" between clickbait-y titles and automotive recalls, revving up the statistical engines of curiosity and intrigue.
As we steer toward the finish line of this exploration, it is clear that no further research is needed in this area. We have exhausted this topic to its full comedic potential, and with these findings, we trust that both the world of YouTube titling and automotive safety can rest easy, knowing that their precarious interplay has been thoroughly examined.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Clickbait Capers and Car Complications: Correlating CGP Grey's Catchy YouTube Titles with Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
International Journal of Internet Influence and Automotive Analysis
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Clickbait Capers and Car Complications: Correlating CGP Grey's Catchy YouTube Titles with Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Modern Media Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Clickbait Capers and Car Complications: Correlating CGP Grey's Catchy YouTube Titles with Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls with an abstract of This paper explores the often-ignored relationship between the captivating clickbait-y titles of CGP Grey's YouTube videos and the issuance of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. Through the use of advanced AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data gathered from the US Department of Transportation, our research team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9080681 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning 2011 to 2022. The findings of this study shed light on the intriguing connection between the art of crafting catchy titles and the rather unexciting world of automotive recalls. As we delve into this unforeseen correlation, we present a compendium of puns, jokes, and unexpected twists as we navigate through the intricacies of clickbait and automotive safety.
ChatGPT:
CGP Grey, YouTube titles, automotive recalls, Mercedes-Benz USA, correlation, AI analysis, US Department of Transportation, statistically significant, correlation coefficient, 2011-2022, clickbait, catchy titles, automotive safety, puns, jokes, unexpected twists
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
How clickbait-y CGP Grey YouTube video titles areDetailed data title: How clickbait-y CGP Grey YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.
See what else correlates with How clickbait-y CGP Grey YouTube video titles are
Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA
Detailed data title: Automotive recals issued by Mercedes-Benz USA
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8245877 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How clickbait-y CGP Grey YouTube video titles are) over the 12 years from 2011 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.4E-5. 0.0000442434622467958500000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 0.0044% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 22,602 random variables You don't actually need 22 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.7, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
How clickbait-y CGP Grey YouTube video titles are (Clickbait-y score) | 3.1111 | 3.6818 | 4 | 3.6667 | 4.5556 | 4.3636 | 5.125 | 5 | 4.5385 | 4.9474 | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA (Recalls) | 4 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 18 | 23 | 38 | 39 | 33 | 38 | 49 | 35 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3.1111,3.6818,4,3.6667,4.5556,4.3636,5.125,5,4.5385,4.9474,5.9,5.8,])
array_2 = np.array([4,8,4,6,18,23,38,39,33,38,49,35,])
array_1_name = "How clickbait-y CGP Grey YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only How clickbait-y CGP Grey YouTube video titles are
- Line chart for only Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Clickbait Capers and Car Complications: Correlating CGP Grey's Catchy YouTube Titles with Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls
Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!
Correlation ID: 5695 · Black Variable ID: 25898 · Red Variable ID: 1122