about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,688 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and the second variable is Total length of Mark Rober YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States increases, there is a corresponding rise in the demand for engaging and educational content. These single fathers, often looking for creative ways to entertain and educate their children, turn to Mark Rober's YouTube channel. As a result, Mark Rober feels a personal responsibility to provide longer and more in-depth videos to cater to this growing demographic of viewers. This ultimately leads to a direct correlation between the increase in single father households and the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s. Depict a warm living room scene where a single father and his children sit together, watching Mark Rober's YouTube channel on a big-screen TV. The father is smiling as he sees his kids' faces light up with wonder and excitement. On the wall, a chart shows the rising number of households headed by single fathers in the United States. On the other side of the room, a giant play button symbolizes the increasing total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos, reflecting the effort to provide engaging and educational content for these families. Create a composition that captures the heartwarming moment and the positive impact of educational entertainment on single-parent households. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and Total length of Mark Rober YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A photo-realistic image A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Scalar art Woodblock painting Brutalism
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and Total length of Mark Rober YouTube videos, in the following situation: As the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States increases, there is a corresponding rise in the demand for engaging and educational content. These single fathers, often looking for creative ways to entertain and educate their children, turn to Mark Rober's YouTube channel. As a result, Mark Rober feels a personal responsibility to provide longer and more in-depth videos to cater to this growing demographic of viewers. This ultimately leads to a direct correlation between the increase in single father households and the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a living room, a single father sits with his children, watching Mark Rober's YouTube channel on a big screen TV. The father smiles as he sees his kids' faces light up with wonder and excitement. On the wall, a chart shows the rising number of households headed by single fathers in the United States. On the other side of the room, a giant play button symbolizes the increasing total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos, reflecting the effort to provide engaging and educational content for these families.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In a living room, a single father sits with his children, watching Mark Rober's YouTube channel on a big screen TV. The father smiles as he sees his kids' faces light up with wonder and excitement. On the wall, a chart shows the rising number of households headed by single fathers in the United States. On the other side of the room, a giant play button symbolizes the increasing total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos, reflecting the effort to provide engaging and educational content for these families. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s. Depict a warm living room scene where a single father and his children sit together, watching Mark Rober's YouTube channel on a big-screen TV. The father is smiling as he sees his kids' faces light up with wonder and excitement. On the wall, a chart shows the rising number of households headed by single fathers in the United States. On the other side of the room, a giant play button symbolizes the increasing total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos, reflecting the effort to provide engaging and educational content for these families. Create a composition that captures the heartwarming moment and the positive impact of educational entertainment on single-parent households.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States caused Total length of Mark Rober YouTube videos to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Father Figures and YouTube Triggers: Exploring the Correlation Between Single Father Households in the United States and the Length of Mark Rober's YouTube Videos

The Journal of Modern Parenting Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and Total length of Mark Rober YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Statista and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9522831 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Father Figures and YouTube Triggers: Exploring the Correlation Between Single Father Households in the United States and the Length of Mark Rober's YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos. By utilizing data from Statista and YouTube, we sought to unravel the potential connections between these seemingly disparate variables. Our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9522831 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2021. We delve into the implications of our findings and offer whimsical musings on the underlying factors at play, including the captivating nature of Rober's content and the elusive allure of DIY science experiments to single dads. Our results prompt further exploration into the intertwined dynamics of modern fatherhood and digital engagement, shedding light on the nuanced interplay between family demographics and online video consumption.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and Total length of Mark Rober YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Father Figures and YouTube Triggers: Exploring the Correlation Between Single Father Households in the United States and the Length of Mark Rober's YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos. By utilizing data from Statista and YouTube, we sought to unravel the potential connections between these seemingly disparate variables. Our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9522831 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2021. We delve into the implications of our findings and offer whimsical musings on the underlying factors at play, including the captivating nature of Rober's content and the elusive allure of DIY science experiments to single dads. Our results prompt further exploration into the intertwined dynamics of modern fatherhood and digital engagement, shedding light on the nuanced interplay between family demographics and online video consumption.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
The role of fatherhood in the contemporary landscape has evolved, with single fathers assuming a pivotal position in shaping familial dynamics and societal norms. Meanwhile, the digital realm has witnessed a proliferation of content creators on platforms such as YouTube, captivating audiences with an eclectic array of videos. In this paper, we embark on a curious exploration of the intersection between these seemingly incongruous domains, seeking to discern the enigmatic relationship between the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos. The convergence of these distinct spheres piques our scholarly curiosity and beckons us to unravel the underlying correlations that may lay dormant beneath the surface.

To comprehend the potential interplay between single father households and the duration of Mark Rober's YouTube oeuvre, we endeavored to dissect the empirical evidence gleaned from robust data sources. Our inquiry into this peculiar association spans the years 2011 to 2021, a period characterized by seismic shifts in digital media consumption and a reconfiguration of familial structures. By analyzing data obtained from Statista and YouTube, we endeavored to unearth the latent ties binding single fatherhood and the captivating content crafted by the inimitable Mark Rober.

The resultant insights, though unexpected, bespeak a correlation coefficient of 0.9522831 and a striking significance level of p < 0.01, reinforcing the credibility of our findings. As we traverse this enthralling terrain of statistical analysis and interdisciplinarity, we cannot help but be enthralled by the ethereal dance between demographics and digital engagement. Our research dropkicks convention, punting traditional scholarly paradigms aside in favor of unraveling the enigmatic relationships underlying these ostensibly disparate phenomena.

In the subsequent sections, we navigate the labyrinthine implications of our findings, delving into the whimsical musings that may explain the peculiar correlation between single father households in the United States and the engrossing allure of Mark Rober's protracted YouTube sojourns. The tapestry of modern fatherhood and digital enchantment unfurls before us, beckoning us to contemplate the mosaic of factors that conspire to tether these spheres in an intricate tango. Our results, though whimsical in appearance, resonate with profound implications for our understanding of the symphonic interplay between familial demographics and the whimsical world of online content creation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and Total length of Mark Rober YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Father Figures and YouTube Triggers: Exploring the Correlation Between Single Father Households in the United States and the Length of Mark Rober's YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos. By utilizing data from Statista and YouTube, we sought to unravel the potential connections between these seemingly disparate variables. Our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9522831 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2021. We delve into the implications of our findings and offer whimsical musings on the underlying factors at play, including the captivating nature of Rober's content and the elusive allure of DIY science experiments to single dads. Our results prompt further exploration into the intertwined dynamics of modern fatherhood and digital engagement, shedding light on the nuanced interplay between family demographics and online video consumption.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The role of fatherhood in the contemporary landscape has evolved, with single fathers assuming a pivotal position in shaping familial dynamics and societal norms. Meanwhile, the digital realm has witnessed a proliferation of content creators on platforms such as YouTube, captivating audiences with an eclectic array of videos. In this paper, we embark on a curious exploration of the intersection between these seemingly incongruous domains, seeking to discern the enigmatic relationship between the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos. The convergence of these distinct spheres piques our scholarly curiosity and beckons us to unravel the underlying correlations that may lay dormant beneath the surface.
To comprehend the potential interplay between single father households and the duration of Mark Rober's YouTube oeuvre, we endeavored to dissect the empirical evidence gleaned from robust data sources. Our inquiry into this peculiar association spans the years 2011 to 2021, a period characterized by seismic shifts in digital media consumption and a reconfiguration of familial structures. By analyzing data obtained from Statista and YouTube, we endeavored to unearth the latent ties binding single fatherhood and the captivating content crafted by the inimitable Mark Rober.
The resultant insights, though unexpected, bespeak a correlation coefficient of 0.9522831 and a striking significance level of p < 0.01, reinforcing the credibility of our findings. As we traverse this enthralling terrain of statistical analysis and interdisciplinarity, we cannot help but be enthralled by the ethereal dance between demographics and digital engagement. Our research dropkicks convention, punting traditional scholarly paradigms aside in favor of unraveling the enigmatic relationships underlying these ostensibly disparate phenomena.
In the subsequent sections, we navigate the labyrinthine implications of our findings, delving into the whimsical musings that may explain the peculiar correlation between single father households in the United States and the engrossing allure of Mark Rober's protracted YouTube sojourns. The tapestry of modern fatherhood and digital enchantment unfurls before us, beckoning us to contemplate the mosaic of factors that conspire to tether these spheres in an intricate tango. Our results, though whimsical in appearance, resonate with profound implications for our understanding of the symphonic interplay between familial demographics and the whimsical world of online content creation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Previous research in this field has predominantly focused on traditional family structures and their association with digital media consumption. Smith (2015) explores the correlation between household demographics and online video preferences, shedding light on the intricate web of familial dynamics that shape viewership patterns. Doe (2017) delves into the evolving role of single fathers in contemporary society, offering a nuanced analysis of their impact on familial norms and behaviors. Jones (2018) investigates the psychological underpinnings of engaging digital content, elucidating the cognitive mechanisms that govern viewer preferences.

Turning to non-fiction literature, "Fatherhood: Evolution of the Modern Dad" by Johnson (2019) provides a comprehensive overview of the shifting landscape of fatherhood, weaving together sociocultural perspectives with individual experiences. Additionally, "The Science of YouTube: Analyzing Online Video and Culture" by Williams (2016) delves into the multifaceted dimensions of digital content creation, unraveling the underlying motivations and audience dynamics.

In the realm of fiction, the works of K. Rowling, particularly the Harry Potter series, offer a whimsical glimpse into the dynamics of parenthood and the captivating allure of magic, albeit in a fantastical context. Similarly, the dystopian narrative of Atwood's "The Handmaid's Tale" provides a thought-provoking exploration of familial structures in a futuristic society, albeit devoid of YouTube videos.

On the small screen, "Breaking Bad" and "Stranger Things" offer tantalizing portrayals of father figures grappling with extraordinary challenges, while "MythBusters" showcases the captivating world of science experiments and DIY ingenuity, akin to the repertoire of Mark Rober's YouTube channel.

With this diverse array of literature and media as a backdrop, we embark on an expedition into the whimsical correlation between single father households in the United States and the immersive escapades of Mark Rober's digital chronicles. Buckle up, as we dare to unravel the enigmatic threads that tie together single fatherhood and YouTube odysseys with a twist of whimsy and humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and Total length of Mark Rober YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and YouTube . You used data from 2011 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Father Figures and YouTube Triggers: Exploring the Correlation Between Single Father Households in the United States and the Length of Mark Rober's YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos. By utilizing data from Statista and YouTube, we sought to unravel the potential connections between these seemingly disparate variables. Our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9522831 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2021. We delve into the implications of our findings and offer whimsical musings on the underlying factors at play, including the captivating nature of Rober's content and the elusive allure of DIY science experiments to single dads. Our results prompt further exploration into the intertwined dynamics of modern fatherhood and digital engagement, shedding light on the nuanced interplay between family demographics and online video consumption.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The role of fatherhood in the contemporary landscape has evolved, with single fathers assuming a pivotal position in shaping familial dynamics and societal norms. Meanwhile, the digital realm has witnessed a proliferation of content creators on platforms such as YouTube, captivating audiences with an eclectic array of videos. In this paper, we embark on a curious exploration of the intersection between these seemingly incongruous domains, seeking to discern the enigmatic relationship between the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos. The convergence of these distinct spheres piques our scholarly curiosity and beckons us to unravel the underlying correlations that may lay dormant beneath the surface.
To comprehend the potential interplay between single father households and the duration of Mark Rober's YouTube oeuvre, we endeavored to dissect the empirical evidence gleaned from robust data sources. Our inquiry into this peculiar association spans the years 2011 to 2021, a period characterized by seismic shifts in digital media consumption and a reconfiguration of familial structures. By analyzing data obtained from Statista and YouTube, we endeavored to unearth the latent ties binding single fatherhood and the captivating content crafted by the inimitable Mark Rober.
The resultant insights, though unexpected, bespeak a correlation coefficient of 0.9522831 and a striking significance level of p < 0.01, reinforcing the credibility of our findings. As we traverse this enthralling terrain of statistical analysis and interdisciplinarity, we cannot help but be enthralled by the ethereal dance between demographics and digital engagement. Our research dropkicks convention, punting traditional scholarly paradigms aside in favor of unraveling the enigmatic relationships underlying these ostensibly disparate phenomena.
In the subsequent sections, we navigate the labyrinthine implications of our findings, delving into the whimsical musings that may explain the peculiar correlation between single father households in the United States and the engrossing allure of Mark Rober's protracted YouTube sojourns. The tapestry of modern fatherhood and digital enchantment unfurls before us, beckoning us to contemplate the mosaic of factors that conspire to tether these spheres in an intricate tango. Our results, though whimsical in appearance, resonate with profound implications for our understanding of the symphonic interplay between familial demographics and the whimsical world of online content creation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the curious nexus between the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and the total duration of Mark Rober's YouTube productions, a convoluted concoction of data analysis techniques, statistical jiggery-pokery, and substantial self-restraint from YouTube rabbit holes was concocted. The heart of our methodological madness lay in the procurement and analysis of data from 2011 to 2021, a timeframe resonant with the digital winds of change and the evolution of non-traditional family structures.

The data on single father households was sourced from the venerable repository of statistical delights, Statista. This treasure trove offered a panoramic vista into the demographic landscape, allowing us to discern the undulations in the number of households helmed by dauntless dads navigating the vicissitudes of solo parenting. On the other hand, the repository of ceaseless digital wonders, YouTube, served as the font of wisdom for deciphering the length of Mark Rober's laudable forays into educational tomfoolery.

Our meticulous approach required first obtaining the aggregate duration of Mark Rober's oeuvre throughout the designated period by extracting data from YouTube's archives. This task, though seemingly straightforward, necessitated the exercise of utmost discipline to resist the seductive allure of "related videos" and "watch next" suggestions. In a feat of colossal fortitude and statistical prowess, our intrepid researchers extracted the duration of each of Mr. Rober's exploits, from the humble beginnings of his channel to the zenith of his YouTube eminence.

Simultaneously, the data on single father households from Statista adorned our analytical canvas like the disparate brushstrokes of a modernist masterpiece. By meticulously aggregating and curating the household figures for each year within the specified timeframe, we erected an edifice of demographic insight, fortified by the unyielding bond of single fathers across the United States.

With the data elements collated and corralled, we invoked the specter of statistical analysis to weave an intricate tapestry of correlation and causation. By unleashing the indomitable force of correlation coefficients and p-values, we endeavored to unearth the hidden connections between these ostensibly discordant variables. The resulting statistics, doused in significance and sprinkled with a hint of whimsy, unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9522831 and a significance level of p < 0.01, akin to unearthing a lustrous gem in the midst of statistical bedrock.

In essence, our research method transcended the banal conventions of traditional statistical inquiry, embracing the paradoxical marriage of digital stoicism and the beguiling allure of single father statistics. The interplay of quantitative rigidity and the enigmatic magnetism of Mark Rober's digital escapades coalesced into a methodological symphony, culminating in the revelation of an astonishing correlation that lingers like an inside joke in the annals of scholarly inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and Total length of Mark Rober YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and YouTube .

For the time period 2011 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9522831, r-squared of 0.9068430, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Father Figures and YouTube Triggers: Exploring the Correlation Between Single Father Households in the United States and the Length of Mark Rober's YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos. By utilizing data from Statista and YouTube, we sought to unravel the potential connections between these seemingly disparate variables. Our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9522831 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2021. We delve into the implications of our findings and offer whimsical musings on the underlying factors at play, including the captivating nature of Rober's content and the elusive allure of DIY science experiments to single dads. Our results prompt further exploration into the intertwined dynamics of modern fatherhood and digital engagement, shedding light on the nuanced interplay between family demographics and online video consumption.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The role of fatherhood in the contemporary landscape has evolved, with single fathers assuming a pivotal position in shaping familial dynamics and societal norms. Meanwhile, the digital realm has witnessed a proliferation of content creators on platforms such as YouTube, captivating audiences with an eclectic array of videos. In this paper, we embark on a curious exploration of the intersection between these seemingly incongruous domains, seeking to discern the enigmatic relationship between the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos. The convergence of these distinct spheres piques our scholarly curiosity and beckons us to unravel the underlying correlations that may lay dormant beneath the surface.
To comprehend the potential interplay between single father households and the duration of Mark Rober's YouTube oeuvre, we endeavored to dissect the empirical evidence gleaned from robust data sources. Our inquiry into this peculiar association spans the years 2011 to 2021, a period characterized by seismic shifts in digital media consumption and a reconfiguration of familial structures. By analyzing data obtained from Statista and YouTube, we endeavored to unearth the latent ties binding single fatherhood and the captivating content crafted by the inimitable Mark Rober.
The resultant insights, though unexpected, bespeak a correlation coefficient of 0.9522831 and a striking significance level of p < 0.01, reinforcing the credibility of our findings. As we traverse this enthralling terrain of statistical analysis and interdisciplinarity, we cannot help but be enthralled by the ethereal dance between demographics and digital engagement. Our research dropkicks convention, punting traditional scholarly paradigms aside in favor of unraveling the enigmatic relationships underlying these ostensibly disparate phenomena.
In the subsequent sections, we navigate the labyrinthine implications of our findings, delving into the whimsical musings that may explain the peculiar correlation between single father households in the United States and the engrossing allure of Mark Rober's protracted YouTube sojourns. The tapestry of modern fatherhood and digital enchantment unfurls before us, beckoning us to contemplate the mosaic of factors that conspire to tether these spheres in an intricate tango. Our results, though whimsical in appearance, resonate with profound implications for our understanding of the symphonic interplay between familial demographics and the whimsical world of online content creation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos for the period from 2011 to 2021. The correlation coefficient was computed as 0.9522831, indicating a robust positive relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables. Additionally, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was 0.9068430, signifying that approximately 91% of the variability in the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos can be explained by the number of single father households. The significance level of p < 0.01 suggests that this relationship is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance, further bolstering the robustness of the observed correlation.

In Fig. 1, the scatterplot vividly portrays the strong positive association between the number of households headed by single fathers and the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos, affirming the statistical findings. The scatterplot showcases the enchanting dance of data points, waltzing in tandem to illuminate the captivating interplay between these two divergent dimensions, much like the harmonious convergence of a catchy tune and a well-crafted video montage.

The unmistakable link between the demographic composition of single father households and the digital opus of Mark Rober beckons us to ponder the whimsical interplay of factors at play. The striking correlation evokes a symphony of peculiar musings, prompting us to contemplate the immersive allure of Rober's content and its resonance with the modern landscape of single fatherhood. These intriguing findings beckon us to unravel the harmonious fabric woven by the intricate threads of demographic shifts and digital engagement, inviting further contemplation of the nuanced interplay between family dynamics and online video consumption.

The results of our investigation underscore the need for in-depth exploration of the entangled dynamics of modern fatherhood and digital stimulation, shedding light on the captivating intersection of family demographics and captivating online content. Further research holds the promise of unraveling the enigmatic relationships that underpin the whimsical dance between familial compositions and digital creations, opening doors to a world of scholarly discovery and intellectual delight.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and Total length of Mark Rober YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Father Figures and YouTube Triggers: Exploring the Correlation Between Single Father Households in the United States and the Length of Mark Rober's YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos. By utilizing data from Statista and YouTube, we sought to unravel the potential connections between these seemingly disparate variables. Our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9522831 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2021. We delve into the implications of our findings and offer whimsical musings on the underlying factors at play, including the captivating nature of Rober's content and the elusive allure of DIY science experiments to single dads. Our results prompt further exploration into the intertwined dynamics of modern fatherhood and digital engagement, shedding light on the nuanced interplay between family demographics and online video consumption.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previous research in this field has predominantly focused on traditional family structures and their association with digital media consumption. Smith (2015) explores the correlation between household demographics and online video preferences, shedding light on the intricate web of familial dynamics that shape viewership patterns. Doe (2017) delves into the evolving role of single fathers in contemporary society, offering a nuanced analysis of their impact on familial norms and behaviors. Jones (2018) investigates the psychological underpinnings of engaging digital content, elucidating the cognitive mechanisms that govern viewer preferences.
Turning to non-fiction literature, "Fatherhood: Evolution of the Modern Dad" by Johnson (2019) provides a comprehensive overview of the shifting landscape of fatherhood, weaving together sociocultural perspectives with individual experiences. Additionally, "The Science of YouTube: Analyzing Online Video and Culture" by Williams (2016) delves into the multifaceted dimensions of digital content creation, unraveling the underlying motivations and audience dynamics.
In the realm of fiction, the works of K. Rowling, particularly the Harry Potter series, offer a whimsical glimpse into the dynamics of parenthood and the captivating allure of magic, albeit in a fantastical context. Similarly, the dystopian narrative of Atwood's "The Handmaid's Tale" provides a thought-provoking exploration of familial structures in a futuristic society, albeit devoid of YouTube videos.
On the small screen, "Breaking Bad" and "Stranger Things" offer tantalizing portrayals of father figures grappling with extraordinary challenges, while "MythBusters" showcases the captivating world of science experiments and DIY ingenuity, akin to the repertoire of Mark Rober's YouTube channel.
With this diverse array of literature and media as a backdrop, we embark on an expedition into the whimsical correlation between single father households in the United States and the immersive escapades of Mark Rober's digital chronicles. Buckle up, as we dare to unravel the enigmatic threads that tie together single fatherhood and YouTube odysseys with a twist of whimsy and humor.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos for the period from 2011 to 2021. The correlation coefficient was computed as 0.9522831, indicating a robust positive relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables. Additionally, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was 0.9068430, signifying that approximately 91% of the variability in the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos can be explained by the number of single father households. The significance level of p < 0.01 suggests that this relationship is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance, further bolstering the robustness of the observed correlation.
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot vividly portrays the strong positive association between the number of households headed by single fathers and the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos, affirming the statistical findings. The scatterplot showcases the enchanting dance of data points, waltzing in tandem to illuminate the captivating interplay between these two divergent dimensions, much like the harmonious convergence of a catchy tune and a well-crafted video montage.
The unmistakable link between the demographic composition of single father households and the digital opus of Mark Rober beckons us to ponder the whimsical interplay of factors at play. The striking correlation evokes a symphony of peculiar musings, prompting us to contemplate the immersive allure of Rober's content and its resonance with the modern landscape of single fatherhood. These intriguing findings beckon us to unravel the harmonious fabric woven by the intricate threads of demographic shifts and digital engagement, inviting further contemplation of the nuanced interplay between family dynamics and online video consumption.
The results of our investigation underscore the need for in-depth exploration of the entangled dynamics of modern fatherhood and digital stimulation, shedding light on the captivating intersection of family demographics and captivating online content. Further research holds the promise of unraveling the enigmatic relationships that underpin the whimsical dance between familial compositions and digital creations, opening doors to a world of scholarly discovery and intellectual delight.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The robust correlation between the number of single father households in the United States and the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos unfolded like a serendipitous duet, echoing the whimsical musings of our literature review. Our findings harmonize with prior research, offering a nuanced lens through which to view the enchanting interplay of family dynamics and digital indulgence. As Smith (2015) hinted at the intricate web of familial influences on online video preferences, our results serve as a crescendo, accentuating the bewitching dance of demographic shifts and digital engagement. Similarly, the poignant analysis by Johnson (2019) of the evolving landscape of fatherhood resonates with our discovery, casting a luminous spotlight on the intertwined fabric of modern fatherhood and captivating online narratives.

We were initially inclined to approach this correlation with a pinch of skepticism, akin to the whimsical fiction of K. Rowling or the dystopian landscapes of Atwood's "The Handmaid's Tale". However, as the data unfurled its tale of enchanting correlations, we were struck by the captivating allure of the underlying relationship. Our study adds a touch of levity to the academically austere landscape, inviting scholars to ponder the enigmatic threads that tie together the captivating dimension of Mark Rober's digital odysseys and the evolving chiaroscuro of single father demographics.

The strong positive association we uncovered prompts us to contemplate the appealing resonance of Rober's content with the modern panorama of single fatherhood. Much like the captivating narrative entwined in "Breaking Bad" or the inquisitive enchantment of "MythBusters", Mark Rober's digital chronicles seem to strike a resonant chord with the captivating world of science experiments and DIY ingenuity, akin to a tantalizing recipe that beckons us to indulge in its eclectic blend of curiosity and wit.

In doing so, our study opens the door to a world of scholarly whimsy, where the intriguing correlation between single father households and the digital opus of Mark Rober elicits a symphony of peculiar musings, inviting us to ponder the immersive allure of Rober's content and its resonance with modern fatherhood. As we venture forth into the nebulous expanse of scholarly discovery and intellectual delight, our findings kindle the flame of curiosity, beckoning future research to unravel the captivating interplay of familial compositions and digital creations with a dose of humor and scholarly vigor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and Total length of Mark Rober YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Father Figures and YouTube Triggers: Exploring the Correlation Between Single Father Households in the United States and the Length of Mark Rober's YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos. By utilizing data from Statista and YouTube, we sought to unravel the potential connections between these seemingly disparate variables. Our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9522831 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2021. We delve into the implications of our findings and offer whimsical musings on the underlying factors at play, including the captivating nature of Rober's content and the elusive allure of DIY science experiments to single dads. Our results prompt further exploration into the intertwined dynamics of modern fatherhood and digital engagement, shedding light on the nuanced interplay between family demographics and online video consumption.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The role of fatherhood in the contemporary landscape has evolved, with single fathers assuming a pivotal position in shaping familial dynamics and societal norms. Meanwhile, the digital realm has witnessed a proliferation of content creators on platforms such as YouTube, captivating audiences with an eclectic array of videos. In this paper, we embark on a curious exploration of the intersection between these seemingly incongruous domains, seeking to discern the enigmatic relationship between the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos. The convergence of these distinct spheres piques our scholarly curiosity and beckons us to unravel the underlying correlations that may lay dormant beneath the surface.
To comprehend the potential interplay between single father households and the duration of Mark Rober's YouTube oeuvre, we endeavored to dissect the empirical evidence gleaned from robust data sources. Our inquiry into this peculiar association spans the years 2011 to 2021, a period characterized by seismic shifts in digital media consumption and a reconfiguration of familial structures. By analyzing data obtained from Statista and YouTube, we endeavored to unearth the latent ties binding single fatherhood and the captivating content crafted by the inimitable Mark Rober.
The resultant insights, though unexpected, bespeak a correlation coefficient of 0.9522831 and a striking significance level of p < 0.01, reinforcing the credibility of our findings. As we traverse this enthralling terrain of statistical analysis and interdisciplinarity, we cannot help but be enthralled by the ethereal dance between demographics and digital engagement. Our research dropkicks convention, punting traditional scholarly paradigms aside in favor of unraveling the enigmatic relationships underlying these ostensibly disparate phenomena.
In the subsequent sections, we navigate the labyrinthine implications of our findings, delving into the whimsical musings that may explain the peculiar correlation between single father households in the United States and the engrossing allure of Mark Rober's protracted YouTube sojourns. The tapestry of modern fatherhood and digital enchantment unfurls before us, beckoning us to contemplate the mosaic of factors that conspire to tether these spheres in an intricate tango. Our results, though whimsical in appearance, resonate with profound implications for our understanding of the symphonic interplay between familial demographics and the whimsical world of online content creation.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos for the period from 2011 to 2021. The correlation coefficient was computed as 0.9522831, indicating a robust positive relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables. Additionally, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was 0.9068430, signifying that approximately 91% of the variability in the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos can be explained by the number of single father households. The significance level of p < 0.01 suggests that this relationship is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance, further bolstering the robustness of the observed correlation.
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot vividly portrays the strong positive association between the number of households headed by single fathers and the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos, affirming the statistical findings. The scatterplot showcases the enchanting dance of data points, waltzing in tandem to illuminate the captivating interplay between these two divergent dimensions, much like the harmonious convergence of a catchy tune and a well-crafted video montage.
The unmistakable link between the demographic composition of single father households and the digital opus of Mark Rober beckons us to ponder the whimsical interplay of factors at play. The striking correlation evokes a symphony of peculiar musings, prompting us to contemplate the immersive allure of Rober's content and its resonance with the modern landscape of single fatherhood. These intriguing findings beckon us to unravel the harmonious fabric woven by the intricate threads of demographic shifts and digital engagement, inviting further contemplation of the nuanced interplay between family dynamics and online video consumption.
The results of our investigation underscore the need for in-depth exploration of the entangled dynamics of modern fatherhood and digital stimulation, shedding light on the captivating intersection of family demographics and captivating online content. Further research holds the promise of unraveling the enigmatic relationships that underpin the whimsical dance between familial compositions and digital creations, opening doors to a world of scholarly discovery and intellectual delight.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation has unveiled a robust and compelling correlation between the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos. The enchanting dance of statistical analysis has revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9522831, akin to a captivating pas de deux between these seemingly incongruent variables. Our findings not only corroborate the profound influence of modern fatherhood on digital engagement but also beckon forth whimsical musings on the peculiar allure of Rober's content to single dads across the nation. The symphonic interplay between demographic shifts and digital enchantment unfurls before us, prompting contemplation of the endearing nexus between family dynamics and online video consumption.

As we wrap up this foray into the captivating realm of statistical inquiry, it is worth noting that our results have the potential to revolutionize our understanding of the intertwined dynamics of familial demographics and online content creation. The inherent whimsy of our findings invites scholars and enthusiasts alike to partake in the dreamscape of correlation, where the unexpected connections cast a spell of endless fascination. However, in the spirit of scientific inquiry (and a penchant for dad jokes), we must assert with utmost sincerity that no more research is needed in this area. After all, we have already uncovered the magical harmony between single fatherhood and Mark Rober's YouTube escapades—an accord that evokes both statistical precision and a touch of whimsy. Our mission is complete, and the enigma has been unraveled. Now, let us rejoice in the whimsical dance of statistical significance and go forth with newfound appreciation for the interconnectedness of modern fatherhood and digital charisma.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Father Figures and YouTube Triggers: Exploring the Correlation Between Single Father Households in the United States and the Length of Mark Rober's YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Modern Parenting Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Father Figures and YouTube Triggers: Exploring the Correlation Between Single Father Households in the United States and the Length of Mark Rober's YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Foundation for Modern Parenting Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Father Figures and YouTube Triggers: Exploring the Correlation Between Single Father Households in the United States and the Length of Mark Rober's YouTube Videos with an abstract of This paper investigates the intriguing relationship between the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States and the total length of Mark Rober's YouTube videos. By utilizing data from Statista and YouTube, we sought to unravel the potential connections between these seemingly disparate variables. Our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9522831 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2021. We delve into the implications of our findings and offer whimsical musings on the underlying factors at play, including the captivating nature of Rober's content and the elusive allure of DIY science experiments to single dads. Our results prompt further exploration into the intertwined dynamics of modern fatherhood and digital engagement, shedding light on the nuanced interplay between family demographics and online video consumption.

ChatGPT:

single father households, United States, YouTube videos, Mark Rober, correlation, statistic data, online video consumption, modern fatherhood, digital engagement, family demographics

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States

Total length of Mark Rober YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total length of Mark Rober YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Total length of Mark Rober YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9522831 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9068430 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 90.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total length of Mark Rober YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States) over the 11 years from 2011 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.2E-6. 0.0000061873051030764210000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 0.00062% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 161,621 random variables You don't actually need 161 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.82, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States (Single father households)58886231633061626311645263516485650669647214
Total length of Mark Rober YouTube videos (Total length in seconds)160193916011943168940754450654764271950721628




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([5888,6231,6330,6162,6311,6452,6351,6485,6506,6964,7214,])
array_2 = np.array([160,1939,1601,1943,1689,4075,4450,6547,6427,19507,21628,])
array_1_name = "Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States"
array_2_name = "Total length of Mark Rober YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 5688 · Black Variable ID: 355 · Red Variable ID: 25584
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0