about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,651 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Memphis and the second variable is The marriage rate in Tennessee.  The chart goes from 1999 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The clearer air revealed that they had nothing in common.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'] Create a vivid landscape of a futuristic city with sleek skyscrapers rising toward a hazy, polluted sky. Show couples strolling hand in hand amidst the bustling city, capturing the celebration of the rising marriage rate against the backdrop of the city's growing air pollution. Mimic the ambiance of a bustling metropolis intertwined with a looming threat, evoking a sense of futuristic sci-fi allure. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Memphis and The marriage rate in Tennessee. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A scene from Skyrim An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Macabre Magic realism
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Memphis and The marriage rate in Tennessee, in the following situation: The clearer air revealed that they had nothing in common.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: The clear Memphis sky unveiled a bustling Tennessee city, where couples strolled hand in hand, celebrating the rising marriage rate. However, a thick haze loomed in the air, a stark reminder of the growing air pollution that threatened the city's health.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' ] and depicting this scene: The clear Memphis sky unveiled a bustling Tennessee city, where couples strolled hand in hand, celebrating the rising marriage rate. However, a thick haze loomed in the air, a stark reminder of the growing air pollution that threatened the city's health. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'] Create a vivid landscape of a futuristic city with sleek skyscrapers rising toward a hazy, polluted sky. Show couples strolling hand in hand amidst the bustling city, capturing the celebration of the rising marriage rate against the backdrop of the city's growing air pollution. Mimic the ambiance of a bustling metropolis intertwined with a looming threat, evoking a sense of futuristic sci-fi allure.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Memphis caused The marriage rate in Tennessee to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Particulate Matrimony: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Memphis and the Marriage Rate in Tennessee

The Journal of Ecological Love Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Memphis and The marriage rate in Tennessee. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and CDC National Vital Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8861862 and p < 0.01 for 1999 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Particulate Matrimony: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Memphis and the Marriage Rate in Tennessee

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of a whimsically unexpected connection between air pollution in the city of Memphis and the marriage rate in the state of Tennessee. Through rigorous analysis of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and CDC National Vital Statistics for the period of 1999 to 2021, a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8861862 with p < 0.01 was observed. The implications of this airy union between environmental factors and social phenomena are both startling and delightful. Our study dives into this unlikely relationship, shedding some light (hopefully clean air) on the matrimony of air pollution and the marriage rate. Readers will be tickled pink by the unexpected connection, proving once and for all that there is indeed "particulate matrimony" in the air.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Memphis and The marriage rate in Tennessee. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Particulate Matrimony: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Memphis and the Marriage Rate in Tennessee

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of a whimsically unexpected connection between air pollution in the city of Memphis and the marriage rate in the state of Tennessee. Through rigorous analysis of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and CDC National Vital Statistics for the period of 1999 to 2021, a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8861862 with p < 0.01 was observed. The implications of this airy union between environmental factors and social phenomena are both startling and delightful. Our study dives into this unlikely relationship, shedding some light (hopefully clean air) on the matrimony of air pollution and the marriage rate. Readers will be tickled pink by the unexpected connection, proving once and for all that there is indeed "particulate matrimony" in the air.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The phrase "love is in the air" takes on a whole new meaning as we delve into the unexpected correlation between air pollution in Memphis and the marriage rate in Tennessee. While whispers of romance and wedding bells are more commonly associated with serenades over candlelit dinners, our research aims to uncover the unexpected marriage between environmental factors and social phenomena.

As researchers, we are often reminded that love knows no bounds, and apparently, this includes atmospheric boundaries. The city of Memphis, renowned for its blues music and mouth-watering barbecue, also grapples with air pollution concerns. Conversely, the state of Tennessee, with its picturesque landscapes and southern charm, experiences fluctuations in its marriage rate. As peculiar as it may seem, this research is not a work of fiction; the correlation between these seemingly unrelated entities truly exists.

In the spirit of scientific inquiry, we embarked on a journey to uncover this unique correlation. Our data sources from the Environmental Protection Agency and the CDC National Vital Statistics uncovered a correlation coefficient that raised our eyebrows (and hopefully not our air pollution levels) – a robust 0.8861862 with p < 0.01. Cue the gasps and applause – even we were surprised by the strength of this relationship. It appears that love may not just be in the air; it might also be influenced by the air itself.

Now, as we unfold the pages of this whimsical tale, we hope to shed light on the connection between particulate matter and partnerships, smog and sweet nothings, and ozone and "I do's." Stay tuned as we navigate this unexpected merger, for the results may just take your breath away – figuratively, of course. After all, who would have thought that there could be "particulate matrimony" in the air?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Memphis and The marriage rate in Tennessee. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Particulate Matrimony: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Memphis and the Marriage Rate in Tennessee

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of a whimsically unexpected connection between air pollution in the city of Memphis and the marriage rate in the state of Tennessee. Through rigorous analysis of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and CDC National Vital Statistics for the period of 1999 to 2021, a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8861862 with p < 0.01 was observed. The implications of this airy union between environmental factors and social phenomena are both startling and delightful. Our study dives into this unlikely relationship, shedding some light (hopefully clean air) on the matrimony of air pollution and the marriage rate. Readers will be tickled pink by the unexpected connection, proving once and for all that there is indeed "particulate matrimony" in the air.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The phrase "love is in the air" takes on a whole new meaning as we delve into the unexpected correlation between air pollution in Memphis and the marriage rate in Tennessee. While whispers of romance and wedding bells are more commonly associated with serenades over candlelit dinners, our research aims to uncover the unexpected marriage between environmental factors and social phenomena.
As researchers, we are often reminded that love knows no bounds, and apparently, this includes atmospheric boundaries. The city of Memphis, renowned for its blues music and mouth-watering barbecue, also grapples with air pollution concerns. Conversely, the state of Tennessee, with its picturesque landscapes and southern charm, experiences fluctuations in its marriage rate. As peculiar as it may seem, this research is not a work of fiction; the correlation between these seemingly unrelated entities truly exists.
In the spirit of scientific inquiry, we embarked on a journey to uncover this unique correlation. Our data sources from the Environmental Protection Agency and the CDC National Vital Statistics uncovered a correlation coefficient that raised our eyebrows (and hopefully not our air pollution levels) – a robust 0.8861862 with p < 0.01. Cue the gasps and applause – even we were surprised by the strength of this relationship. It appears that love may not just be in the air; it might also be influenced by the air itself.
Now, as we unfold the pages of this whimsical tale, we hope to shed light on the connection between particulate matter and partnerships, smog and sweet nothings, and ozone and "I do's." Stay tuned as we navigate this unexpected merger, for the results may just take your breath away – figuratively, of course. After all, who would have thought that there could be "particulate matrimony" in the air?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The exploration of the connection between air pollution in Memphis and the marriage rate in Tennessee has stirred considerable academic interest and speculation over the years. Primarily, researchers have approached this unconventional correlation with a blend of skepticism and curiosity.

Smith and Doe (2008) initially delved into the atmospheric impact on social behavior, drawing attention to the unintentional consequences of air pollution on interpersonal relationships. Despite their thorough investigation, the notion that air pollution could be the unseen force shaping Tennessee's marriage rate seemed as improbable as a flying pig. However, Jones (2012) brought fresh insight into the romantic ramifications of environmental factors, illuminating the potential influence of smog on courtship. Nevertheless, the idea of "saying I do" under the influence of nitrogen oxides continued to defy conventional wisdom.

Turning to a different type of literature, the non-fiction realm has not been immune to speculating on the interplay between environmental factors and human relationships. In "The Air We Breathe: A Study of Urban Pollution" by Green (2015), the focus is predominantly on the health implications of air pollution, but nestled within the chapters lay subtle hints of the impact on social dynamics. Green's work set the stage for a momentous shift in perspective, inviting readers to ponder whether love indeed mingles with particulate matter in an unforeseen waltz.

On the more speculative side, fiction has provided ample fodder for the exploration of improbable connections. In "Smoke and Mirrors: A Tale of Love and Air Quality" by Silver (2017), the protagonist's love life intertwines with the city's pollution levels, culminating in a quirky yet thought-provoking narrative. Meanwhile, in "Ozone Odyssey" by Gold (2019), the protagonist's romantic escapades coincidentally mirror the fluctuating air quality index, prompting readers to consider the whimsical notion of a symbiotic relationship between love and airborne pollutants.

In the spirit of thorough research, the authors of this paper also turned to the screen for inspiration, binge-watching TV shows in the name of scientific inquiry. "The Smoggy Romance Diaries" and "Married to the Mist: A Love Story in Hazy Memphis" provided unexpected insights into the television landscape's take on the intersection of air pollution and matrimonial bonds. While these shows were undoubtedly entertaining, they also lent credence to the notion that the murky haze of environmental factors may indeed cast a whimsical spell over the realm of relationships.

As the literature reveals, the connection between air pollution in Memphis and the marriage rate in Tennessee has been a subject of both scholarly consideration and creative exploration. The unexpected convergence of these seemingly disparate domains has indeed captured the imagination of researchers and artists alike, inviting us all to ponder the enigmatic dance of love and airborne particles in the volatilizing atmosphere of Tennessee.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Memphis and The marriage rate in Tennessee. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and CDC National Vital Statistics . You used data from 1999 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Particulate Matrimony: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Memphis and the Marriage Rate in Tennessee

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of a whimsically unexpected connection between air pollution in the city of Memphis and the marriage rate in the state of Tennessee. Through rigorous analysis of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and CDC National Vital Statistics for the period of 1999 to 2021, a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8861862 with p < 0.01 was observed. The implications of this airy union between environmental factors and social phenomena are both startling and delightful. Our study dives into this unlikely relationship, shedding some light (hopefully clean air) on the matrimony of air pollution and the marriage rate. Readers will be tickled pink by the unexpected connection, proving once and for all that there is indeed "particulate matrimony" in the air.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The phrase "love is in the air" takes on a whole new meaning as we delve into the unexpected correlation between air pollution in Memphis and the marriage rate in Tennessee. While whispers of romance and wedding bells are more commonly associated with serenades over candlelit dinners, our research aims to uncover the unexpected marriage between environmental factors and social phenomena.
As researchers, we are often reminded that love knows no bounds, and apparently, this includes atmospheric boundaries. The city of Memphis, renowned for its blues music and mouth-watering barbecue, also grapples with air pollution concerns. Conversely, the state of Tennessee, with its picturesque landscapes and southern charm, experiences fluctuations in its marriage rate. As peculiar as it may seem, this research is not a work of fiction; the correlation between these seemingly unrelated entities truly exists.
In the spirit of scientific inquiry, we embarked on a journey to uncover this unique correlation. Our data sources from the Environmental Protection Agency and the CDC National Vital Statistics uncovered a correlation coefficient that raised our eyebrows (and hopefully not our air pollution levels) – a robust 0.8861862 with p < 0.01. Cue the gasps and applause – even we were surprised by the strength of this relationship. It appears that love may not just be in the air; it might also be influenced by the air itself.
Now, as we unfold the pages of this whimsical tale, we hope to shed light on the connection between particulate matter and partnerships, smog and sweet nothings, and ozone and "I do's." Stay tuned as we navigate this unexpected merger, for the results may just take your breath away – figuratively, of course. After all, who would have thought that there could be "particulate matrimony" in the air?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the captivating "particulate matrimony" between air pollution in Memphis and the marriage rate in Tennessee, a multidisciplinary approach was adopted. Our research team took a deep dive into the data from the Environmental Protection Agency and CDC National Vital Statistics. We certainly left no stone unturned (or should I say, no pollutant particle unexamined) in our quest for understanding this peculiar connection.

Firstly, we embarked on a magical mystery tour through the vast expanse of internet databases, wading through a sea of statistics and figures, all in the pursuit of the elusive relationship between air quality and marital bliss. The Environmental Protection Agency became our trusty steed, providing us with a trove of pollutant data from Memphis and surrounding areas. We sifted through years of data from 1999 to 2021, uncovering the secrets hidden within the particles and pollutants that permeate the Memphis air.

Next, our band of merrymakers turned to the CDC National Vital Statistics for a glimpse into the intricate dance of matrimony across the state of Tennessee. Armed with marriage rates and demographic data, we ventured into the labyrinth of numbers, seeking the subtle patterns that may reveal a correlation with the pollutant-laden breezes of Memphis.

With our data sources in hand, we brandished our statistical tools like mighty swords, ready to slay the dragons of uncertainty and uncover the hidden truths within the data. Through robust statistical analysis, we calculated correlation coefficients, performed regression analyses, and constructed models that would make even the most stoic of statisticians crack a smile.

And there you have it, dear reader - our methodology. While it may not involve mysterious alchemy or clandestine meetings in the dead of night, our journey through the data was no less thrilling. We're now ready to reveal the results of our quest for "particulate matrimony." So hold onto your hats (or should I say, gas masks) as we unveil the findings of this whimsically unexpected union between the air and affairs of the heart.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Memphis and The marriage rate in Tennessee. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and CDC National Vital Statistics .

For the time period 1999 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8861862, r-squared of 0.7853260, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Particulate Matrimony: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Memphis and the Marriage Rate in Tennessee

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of a whimsically unexpected connection between air pollution in the city of Memphis and the marriage rate in the state of Tennessee. Through rigorous analysis of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and CDC National Vital Statistics for the period of 1999 to 2021, a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8861862 with p < 0.01 was observed. The implications of this airy union between environmental factors and social phenomena are both startling and delightful. Our study dives into this unlikely relationship, shedding some light (hopefully clean air) on the matrimony of air pollution and the marriage rate. Readers will be tickled pink by the unexpected connection, proving once and for all that there is indeed "particulate matrimony" in the air.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The phrase "love is in the air" takes on a whole new meaning as we delve into the unexpected correlation between air pollution in Memphis and the marriage rate in Tennessee. While whispers of romance and wedding bells are more commonly associated with serenades over candlelit dinners, our research aims to uncover the unexpected marriage between environmental factors and social phenomena.
As researchers, we are often reminded that love knows no bounds, and apparently, this includes atmospheric boundaries. The city of Memphis, renowned for its blues music and mouth-watering barbecue, also grapples with air pollution concerns. Conversely, the state of Tennessee, with its picturesque landscapes and southern charm, experiences fluctuations in its marriage rate. As peculiar as it may seem, this research is not a work of fiction; the correlation between these seemingly unrelated entities truly exists.
In the spirit of scientific inquiry, we embarked on a journey to uncover this unique correlation. Our data sources from the Environmental Protection Agency and the CDC National Vital Statistics uncovered a correlation coefficient that raised our eyebrows (and hopefully not our air pollution levels) – a robust 0.8861862 with p < 0.01. Cue the gasps and applause – even we were surprised by the strength of this relationship. It appears that love may not just be in the air; it might also be influenced by the air itself.
Now, as we unfold the pages of this whimsical tale, we hope to shed light on the connection between particulate matter and partnerships, smog and sweet nothings, and ozone and "I do's." Stay tuned as we navigate this unexpected merger, for the results may just take your breath away – figuratively, of course. After all, who would have thought that there could be "particulate matrimony" in the air?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the data revealed an unexpected and significantly strong positive correlation between air pollution in Memphis and the marriage rate in Tennessee for the period of 1999 to 2021. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.8861862, with an r-squared value of 0.7853260 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a highly statistically significant relationship. This finding left us feeling both breathless and breath-filled, as we pondered the peculiar connection between airborne particles and nuptial celebrations.

Figure 1 illustrates the robust correlation between air pollution in Memphis and the marriage rate in Tennessee. The scatterplot points out the compelling relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, leaving viewers to wonder whether love truly does conquer all, including the adverse effects of smog and soot.

While the results of this study may seem whimsical at first glance, they highlight the importance of considering environmental factors in the study of social phenomena. The significance of this unexpected correlation extends beyond mere statistical curiosity; it prompts us to rethink the intricate ways in which our surroundings influence human behavior and societal trends.

The unexpected nature of our findings underscores the need for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms that drive this correlation. Considering the potential implications for public health and social policy, the existence of "particulate matrimony" in the air may call for a more nuanced understanding of the interplay between environmental factors and human relationships.

In conclusion, our study reveals a remarkable and robust correlation between air pollution in Memphis and the marriage rate in Tennessee, inviting further exploration and contemplation of the intricate dance between atmospheric conditions and societal patterns. As we continue to unravel the enigmatic connections between seemingly disparate elements, we are reminded that love, like air pollution, can sometimes be truly breathtaking.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Memphis and The marriage rate in Tennessee. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Particulate Matrimony: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Memphis and the Marriage Rate in Tennessee

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of a whimsically unexpected connection between air pollution in the city of Memphis and the marriage rate in the state of Tennessee. Through rigorous analysis of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and CDC National Vital Statistics for the period of 1999 to 2021, a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8861862 with p < 0.01 was observed. The implications of this airy union between environmental factors and social phenomena are both startling and delightful. Our study dives into this unlikely relationship, shedding some light (hopefully clean air) on the matrimony of air pollution and the marriage rate. Readers will be tickled pink by the unexpected connection, proving once and for all that there is indeed "particulate matrimony" in the air.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The exploration of the connection between air pollution in Memphis and the marriage rate in Tennessee has stirred considerable academic interest and speculation over the years. Primarily, researchers have approached this unconventional correlation with a blend of skepticism and curiosity.
Smith and Doe (2008) initially delved into the atmospheric impact on social behavior, drawing attention to the unintentional consequences of air pollution on interpersonal relationships. Despite their thorough investigation, the notion that air pollution could be the unseen force shaping Tennessee's marriage rate seemed as improbable as a flying pig. However, Jones (2012) brought fresh insight into the romantic ramifications of environmental factors, illuminating the potential influence of smog on courtship. Nevertheless, the idea of "saying I do" under the influence of nitrogen oxides continued to defy conventional wisdom.
Turning to a different type of literature, the non-fiction realm has not been immune to speculating on the interplay between environmental factors and human relationships. In "The Air We Breathe: A Study of Urban Pollution" by Green (2015), the focus is predominantly on the health implications of air pollution, but nestled within the chapters lay subtle hints of the impact on social dynamics. Green's work set the stage for a momentous shift in perspective, inviting readers to ponder whether love indeed mingles with particulate matter in an unforeseen waltz.
On the more speculative side, fiction has provided ample fodder for the exploration of improbable connections. In "Smoke and Mirrors: A Tale of Love and Air Quality" by Silver (2017), the protagonist's love life intertwines with the city's pollution levels, culminating in a quirky yet thought-provoking narrative. Meanwhile, in "Ozone Odyssey" by Gold (2019), the protagonist's romantic escapades coincidentally mirror the fluctuating air quality index, prompting readers to consider the whimsical notion of a symbiotic relationship between love and airborne pollutants.
In the spirit of thorough research, the authors of this paper also turned to the screen for inspiration, binge-watching TV shows in the name of scientific inquiry. "The Smoggy Romance Diaries" and "Married to the Mist: A Love Story in Hazy Memphis" provided unexpected insights into the television landscape's take on the intersection of air pollution and matrimonial bonds. While these shows were undoubtedly entertaining, they also lent credence to the notion that the murky haze of environmental factors may indeed cast a whimsical spell over the realm of relationships.
As the literature reveals, the connection between air pollution in Memphis and the marriage rate in Tennessee has been a subject of both scholarly consideration and creative exploration. The unexpected convergence of these seemingly disparate domains has indeed captured the imagination of researchers and artists alike, inviting us all to ponder the enigmatic dance of love and airborne particles in the volatilizing atmosphere of Tennessee.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data revealed an unexpected and significantly strong positive correlation between air pollution in Memphis and the marriage rate in Tennessee for the period of 1999 to 2021. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.8861862, with an r-squared value of 0.7853260 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a highly statistically significant relationship. This finding left us feeling both breathless and breath-filled, as we pondered the peculiar connection between airborne particles and nuptial celebrations.
Figure 1 illustrates the robust correlation between air pollution in Memphis and the marriage rate in Tennessee. The scatterplot points out the compelling relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, leaving viewers to wonder whether love truly does conquer all, including the adverse effects of smog and soot.
While the results of this study may seem whimsical at first glance, they highlight the importance of considering environmental factors in the study of social phenomena. The significance of this unexpected correlation extends beyond mere statistical curiosity; it prompts us to rethink the intricate ways in which our surroundings influence human behavior and societal trends.
The unexpected nature of our findings underscores the need for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms that drive this correlation. Considering the potential implications for public health and social policy, the existence of "particulate matrimony" in the air may call for a more nuanced understanding of the interplay between environmental factors and human relationships.
In conclusion, our study reveals a remarkable and robust correlation between air pollution in Memphis and the marriage rate in Tennessee, inviting further exploration and contemplation of the intricate dance between atmospheric conditions and societal patterns. As we continue to unravel the enigmatic connections between seemingly disparate elements, we are reminded that love, like air pollution, can sometimes be truly breathtaking.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The unexpectedly robust positive correlation between air pollution in Memphis and the marriage rate in Tennessee, as observed in our study, has sparked ripples of excitement in the academic pond. Our findings not only support prior research suggesting a potential link between environmental factors and social dynamics, but they also add a breath of fresh air to the existing literature – pun intended.

Harkening back to the whimsically unexpected speculations and sources cited in our literature review, it is remarkable that our study has provided empirical evidence in support of the seemingly improbable connection drawn by previous researchers and authors. Who would have thought that romantic escapades and airborne pollutants could indeed share a dance in the volatilizing atmosphere of Tennessee? It appears that the air we breathe may have more profound implications on our social behavior than previously imagined.

More than just a statistical curiosity, our findings prompt us to consider the broader implications of "particulate matrimony" for public health and social policy. The existence of a significant correlation between air pollution and the marriage rate invites us to rethink our understanding of the complex interplay between environmental factors and human relationships. Perhaps, in the realm of love, the presence of airborne particles does not necessarily smog the prospects of marital bliss but rather becomes an unexpected player in the dance of relationships.

Though our results may seem as surprising as finding a love note in a bottle of smog-infused air, they underscore the importance of considering environmental factors in the study of social phenomena. As we continue to unravel the enigmatic connections between seemingly disparate elements, our study is a reminder that there is always more to the story than meets the "eye-ribe."

In this light, our study serves as a breath of fresh air in the realm of interdisciplinary research, cultivating further curiosity and contemplation about the whimsical interplay between atmospheric conditions and societal patterns. As we ponder the unexpected union of air pollution and the marriage rate, perhaps we should also ponder the possibility of "particulate matrimony" as a seasonally-adjusted factor influencing the ebbs and flows of love and romance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Memphis and The marriage rate in Tennessee. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Particulate Matrimony: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Memphis and the Marriage Rate in Tennessee

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of a whimsically unexpected connection between air pollution in the city of Memphis and the marriage rate in the state of Tennessee. Through rigorous analysis of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and CDC National Vital Statistics for the period of 1999 to 2021, a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8861862 with p < 0.01 was observed. The implications of this airy union between environmental factors and social phenomena are both startling and delightful. Our study dives into this unlikely relationship, shedding some light (hopefully clean air) on the matrimony of air pollution and the marriage rate. Readers will be tickled pink by the unexpected connection, proving once and for all that there is indeed "particulate matrimony" in the air.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The phrase "love is in the air" takes on a whole new meaning as we delve into the unexpected correlation between air pollution in Memphis and the marriage rate in Tennessee. While whispers of romance and wedding bells are more commonly associated with serenades over candlelit dinners, our research aims to uncover the unexpected marriage between environmental factors and social phenomena.
As researchers, we are often reminded that love knows no bounds, and apparently, this includes atmospheric boundaries. The city of Memphis, renowned for its blues music and mouth-watering barbecue, also grapples with air pollution concerns. Conversely, the state of Tennessee, with its picturesque landscapes and southern charm, experiences fluctuations in its marriage rate. As peculiar as it may seem, this research is not a work of fiction; the correlation between these seemingly unrelated entities truly exists.
In the spirit of scientific inquiry, we embarked on a journey to uncover this unique correlation. Our data sources from the Environmental Protection Agency and the CDC National Vital Statistics uncovered a correlation coefficient that raised our eyebrows (and hopefully not our air pollution levels) – a robust 0.8861862 with p < 0.01. Cue the gasps and applause – even we were surprised by the strength of this relationship. It appears that love may not just be in the air; it might also be influenced by the air itself.
Now, as we unfold the pages of this whimsical tale, we hope to shed light on the connection between particulate matter and partnerships, smog and sweet nothings, and ozone and "I do's." Stay tuned as we navigate this unexpected merger, for the results may just take your breath away – figuratively, of course. After all, who would have thought that there could be "particulate matrimony" in the air?

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data revealed an unexpected and significantly strong positive correlation between air pollution in Memphis and the marriage rate in Tennessee for the period of 1999 to 2021. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.8861862, with an r-squared value of 0.7853260 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a highly statistically significant relationship. This finding left us feeling both breathless and breath-filled, as we pondered the peculiar connection between airborne particles and nuptial celebrations.
Figure 1 illustrates the robust correlation between air pollution in Memphis and the marriage rate in Tennessee. The scatterplot points out the compelling relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, leaving viewers to wonder whether love truly does conquer all, including the adverse effects of smog and soot.
While the results of this study may seem whimsical at first glance, they highlight the importance of considering environmental factors in the study of social phenomena. The significance of this unexpected correlation extends beyond mere statistical curiosity; it prompts us to rethink the intricate ways in which our surroundings influence human behavior and societal trends.
The unexpected nature of our findings underscores the need for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms that drive this correlation. Considering the potential implications for public health and social policy, the existence of "particulate matrimony" in the air may call for a more nuanced understanding of the interplay between environmental factors and human relationships.
In conclusion, our study reveals a remarkable and robust correlation between air pollution in Memphis and the marriage rate in Tennessee, inviting further exploration and contemplation of the intricate dance between atmospheric conditions and societal patterns. As we continue to unravel the enigmatic connections between seemingly disparate elements, we are reminded that love, like air pollution, can sometimes be truly breathtaking.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the midst of our research, it became crystal clear — the "particulate matrimony" between air pollution and the marriage rate is no laughing matter, although we couldn't help but chuckle at the unexpected dance of love and pollution. The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8861862, with a p-value of less than 0.01, blew us away like a gust of polluted wind. It seems the allure of love is not immune to the influence of airborne particles, proving that when it comes to matters of the heart, even the air we breathe plays a role in our romantic escapades.

As we wrap up this study, we can confidently declare that our findings beg further contemplation into the multifaceted intersection of human behavior and environmental factors. Who would have thought that a city renowned for its BBQ could also stir up some romance-killing air pollution? But fear not, lovebirds of Memphis – our findings might just spur a romantic revolution for cleaner air and even stronger bonds. After all, isn't it said that love conquers all, including the pesky pollutants in the air?

However, in the spirit of humor and scientific sanity, we have to draw the curtain on this particular research avenue. It's safe to say that no more research is needed to delve into the whimsical world of "particulate matrimony" in the air. Let's leave well enough alone and allow this discovery to linger in the realm of delightful scientific oddities, like the intricate mating rituals of the humble dung beetle. As for the connection between air pollution in Memphis and the marriage rate in Tennessee, we've turned over every stone, or in this case, every smoggy cloud. It's time to move on from this airy affair and explore other research endeavors – much like a post-wedding honeymoon.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Particulate Matrimony: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Memphis and the Marriage Rate in Tennessee. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ecological Love Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Particulate Matrimony: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Memphis and the Marriage Rate in Tennessee. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Ecological and Societal Research (SESR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Particulate Matrimony: Exploring the Link Between Air Pollution in Memphis and the Marriage Rate in Tennessee with an abstract of This paper presents the findings of a whimsically unexpected connection between air pollution in the city of Memphis and the marriage rate in the state of Tennessee. Through rigorous analysis of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and CDC National Vital Statistics for the period of 1999 to 2021, a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8861862 with p < 0.01 was observed. The implications of this airy union between environmental factors and social phenomena are both startling and delightful. Our study dives into this unlikely relationship, shedding some light (hopefully clean air) on the matrimony of air pollution and the marriage rate. Readers will be tickled pink by the unexpected connection, proving once and for all that there is indeed "particulate matrimony" in the air.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, marriage rate, Memphis, Tennessee, Environmental Protection Agency, CDC National Vital Statistics, correlation coefficient, social phenomena, particulate matter, environmental factors

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Memphis
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Memphis, TN-MS-AR
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Memphis

The marriage rate in Tennessee
Source: CDC National Vital Statistics
See what else correlates with The marriage rate in Tennessee

Correlation r = 0.8861862 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7853260 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 78.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The marriage rate in Tennessee) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Memphis) over the 23 years from 1999 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.8E-8. 0.0000000184837974668343440000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 1.8E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 54,101,437 random variables You don't actually need 54 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.75, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Air pollution in Memphis (Bad air quality days)9.04116.284153.287674.383562.465750.5464483.561642.191781.369860.81967200.5479451.643842.185790000.2732240.2739730.27397300.2732240
The marriage rate in Tennessee (Marriage rate)14.715.513.513.111.911.410.910.610.19.48.48.898.88.447848.409238.502348.614098.234397.95117.488757.342567.60292




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([9.0411,6.28415,3.28767,4.38356,2.46575,0.546448,3.56164,2.19178,1.36986,0.819672,0,0.547945,1.64384,2.18579,0,0,0,0.273224,0.273973,0.273973,0,0.273224,0,])
array_2 = np.array([14.7,15.5,13.5,13.1,11.9,11.4,10.9,10.6,10.1,9.4,8.4,8.8,9,8.8,8.44784,8.40923,8.50234,8.61409,8.23439,7.9511,7.48875,7.34256,7.60292,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Memphis"
array_2_name = "The marriage rate in Tennessee"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 5651 · Black Variable ID: 20884 · Red Variable ID: 19779
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0