Download png, svg
AI explanation
It turns out that as Democrat votes for Senators in Maryland increased, so did the demand for locker room attendants. Apparently, the mere act of casting a blue vote released some kind of pro-attendant pheromones that wafted through the state, leading to a sudden surge in people insisting on having their locker rooms impeccably attended to. Perhaps it sparked a trend in political fashion, leading to more frequent gym visits and, consequently, a dire need for additional locker room attendants to cater to the suddenly bustling Democratic-friendly fitness centers. Or maybe it's simply because as political tensions eased, more people found themselves in the mood for a post-vote workout and a refreshing towel service. It's a truly bewildering, yet fascinating, association that reminds us that politics and hygiene may have more in common than we ever imagined.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Image Generation Prompt: Description: Show a bustling high-tech fitness center, with vibrant blue lighting illuminating the scene. The locker room attendants are depicted as sleek, futuristic robots, diligently organizing the lockers and tending to the needs of the gym-goers. The atmosphere exudes an atmosphere of technological efficiency and sophistication, symbolizing the surge in demand for their services driven by the Democratic wave. Capture the fusion of cutting-edge technology with the energetic ambiance of a busy fitness center, highlighting the newfound interest in post-vote workouts. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for Democratic Senators in Maryland and The number of locker room attendants in Maryland. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A photo-realistic image Photorealism Brutalism High-tech Cute 2D animation
ChatGPT: High-tech
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for Democratic Senators in Maryland and The number of locker room attendants in Maryland, in the following situation: It turns out that as Democrat votes for Senators in Maryland increased, so did the demand for locker room attendants. Apparently, the mere act of casting a blue vote released some kind of pro-attendant pheromones that wafted through the state, leading to a sudden surge in people insisting on having their locker rooms impeccably attended to. Perhaps it sparked a trend in political fashion, leading to more frequent gym visits and, consequently, a dire need for additional locker room attendants to cater to the suddenly bustling Democratic-friendly fitness centers. Or maybe it's simply because as political tensions eased, more people found themselves in the mood for a post-vote workout and a refreshing towel service. It's a truly bewildering, yet fascinating, association that reminds us that politics and hygiene may have more in common than we ever imagined. . Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: As the number of votes for Democratic Senators in Maryland increased, more locker room attendants were seen bustling through busy fitness centers, tending to impeccably organized locker rooms. The vibrant blue wave seemed to have released some sort of pro-attendant pheromones, leading to a sudden surge in demand for their services. The political trend seemed to have sparked a newfound interest in post-vote workouts, creating the need for additional attendants to accommodate the bustling Democratic-friendly gym visits.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: As the number of votes for Democratic Senators in Maryland increased, more locker room attendants were seen bustling through busy fitness centers, tending to impeccably organized locker rooms. The vibrant blue wave seemed to have released some sort of pro-attendant pheromones, leading to a sudden surge in demand for their services. The political trend seemed to have sparked a newfound interest in post-vote workouts, creating the need for additional attendants to accommodate the bustling Democratic-friendly gym visits. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Image Generation Prompt: Description: Show a bustling high-tech fitness center, with vibrant blue lighting illuminating the scene. The locker room attendants are depicted as sleek, futuristic robots, diligently organizing the lockers and tending to the needs of the gym-goers. The atmosphere exudes an atmosphere of technological efficiency and sophistication, symbolizing the surge in demand for their services driven by the Democratic wave. Capture the fusion of cutting-edge technology with the energetic ambiance of a busy fitness center, highlighting the newfound interest in post-vote workouts.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Democrat votes for Senators in Maryland positively influenced The number of locker room attendants in Maryland.\Make it sound serious until the end.
AI academic paper
Counting the Votes: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Maryland and the Employment of Locker Room Attendants Journal of Political Statistics and Unusual Correlations Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Maryland and The number of locker room attendants in Maryland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title seem clever.
Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9110373 and p < 0.05 for 2003 to 2018.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Counting the Votes: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Maryland and the Employment of Locker Room Attendants
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing question of the potential correlation between Democrat votes for senators in Maryland and the number of locker room attendants employed in the state. Leveraging data from reputable sources such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we set out to uncover any hidden ties between political preferences and locker room staffing. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a significant correlation coefficient of 0.9110373, with a p-value less than 0.05, was unveiled for the time frame spanning from 2003 to 2018. The results of our study provide compelling insights into the realm of political dynamics and workforce trends, shedding new light on the unanticipated interplay between political choices and employment practices within the state of Maryland.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Maryland and The number of locker room attendants in Maryland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Counting the Votes: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Maryland and the Employment of Locker Room Attendants
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing question of the potential correlation between Democrat votes for senators in Maryland and the number of locker room attendants employed in the state. Leveraging data from reputable sources such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we set out to uncover any hidden ties between political preferences and locker room staffing. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a significant correlation coefficient of 0.9110373, with a p-value less than 0.05, was unveiled for the time frame spanning from 2003 to 2018. The results of our study provide compelling insights into the realm of political dynamics and workforce trends, shedding new light on the unanticipated interplay between political choices and employment practices within the state of Maryland.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of statistical analysis, it's often a game of connecting the dots, even if they seem unrelated at first glance. This study delves into the curious case of the potential relationship between Democrat votes for senators in Maryland and the employment of locker room attendants. While one might initially raise an eyebrow at the seemingly disparate nature of these variables, our investigation seeks to uncover any hidden patterns or curious correlations that may lurk within the data.
The state of Maryland, known for its crab cakes, charming waterfront towns, and a vibrant political landscape, offers an intriguing backdrop for this unlikely association. With its distinctive voter demographics and diverse employment sectors, the Old Line State presents a fertile ground for exploring the interplay between political preferences and labor force compositions. While the mere mention of locker room attendants may conjure images of locker rooms in athletic facilities or leisure centers, there's no denying their presence across a spectrum of establishments, adding an intriguing layer of complexity to this investigation.
Despite the eyebrow-raising nature of this inquiry, it is crucial to approach the analysis with all due seriousness and rigor. We aim to bring to light any potential insights with a keen eye for statistical significance, steering clear of any leaping to hasty conclusions or spinning mere correlations into causation. With this analytical posture in mind, we embark on our empirical voyage, poised to unravel any unforeseen connections in the nexus of political preferences and labor market dynamics.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Maryland and The number of locker room attendants in Maryland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Counting the Votes: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Maryland and the Employment of Locker Room Attendants
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing question of the potential correlation between Democrat votes for senators in Maryland and the number of locker room attendants employed in the state. Leveraging data from reputable sources such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we set out to uncover any hidden ties between political preferences and locker room staffing. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a significant correlation coefficient of 0.9110373, with a p-value less than 0.05, was unveiled for the time frame spanning from 2003 to 2018. The results of our study provide compelling insights into the realm of political dynamics and workforce trends, shedding new light on the unanticipated interplay between political choices and employment practices within the state of Maryland.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of statistical analysis, it's often a game of connecting the dots, even if they seem unrelated at first glance. This study delves into the curious case of the potential relationship between Democrat votes for senators in Maryland and the employment of locker room attendants. While one might initially raise an eyebrow at the seemingly disparate nature of these variables, our investigation seeks to uncover any hidden patterns or curious correlations that may lurk within the data.
The state of Maryland, known for its crab cakes, charming waterfront towns, and a vibrant political landscape, offers an intriguing backdrop for this unlikely association. With its distinctive voter demographics and diverse employment sectors, the Old Line State presents a fertile ground for exploring the interplay between political preferences and labor force compositions. While the mere mention of locker room attendants may conjure images of locker rooms in athletic facilities or leisure centers, there's no denying their presence across a spectrum of establishments, adding an intriguing layer of complexity to this investigation.
Despite the eyebrow-raising nature of this inquiry, it is crucial to approach the analysis with all due seriousness and rigor. We aim to bring to light any potential insights with a keen eye for statistical significance, steering clear of any leaping to hasty conclusions or spinning mere correlations into causation. With this analytical posture in mind, we embark on our empirical voyage, poised to unravel any unforeseen connections in the nexus of political preferences and labor market dynamics.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Political Preferences and Employment Trends: An Analysis of Maryland's Workforce Dynamics," Smith (2015) explores the relationship between political preferences and workforce compositions in the state of Maryland. While the focus of the study is primarily on broader industry sectors, the findings offer valuable insights into the potential interplay between political dynamics and labor market trends. The work of Doe (2017) in "Election Data Analysis: Patterns and Predictions" further contributes to this area of inquiry, emphasizing the need for an integrated approach encompassing demographic voting patterns and employment demographics.
Delving deeper into the realm of labor force dynamics, Jones (2018) analyzes the occupational composition of Maryland, shedding light on the distribution of employment across various occupations. Although the study does not explicitly delve into political correlations, its comprehensive overview of workforce structures provides a foundation for examining potential connections between political preferences and specific occupations.
Turning to the broader literature, "The Economics of Voting: Studies in Rational Choice Behavior" by Johnson and Smith (2004) offers insights into the rationality and motivations underlying voter behavior. While the focus of the book pertains to economic theories of voting, its exploration of decision-making processes within the political sphere may offer valuable parallels to the present study. In a similar vein, "Political Economy: Theories and Case Studies" by Anderson (2012) delves into the intricate intersection of political and economic phenomena, presenting a rich tapestry of theoretical frameworks that may inform our examination of political-employment correlations.
Expanding the scope to fiction works with potential relevance to our study, "The Polling Paradox" by Novelist (2016) presents a satirical portrayal of the confluence of political polling and unexpected correlations, offering a lighthearted take on the enigma of statistical relationships. Similarly, "The Curious Case of the Counted Votes" by Storyteller (2009) weaves a whimsical narrative around the unexpected consequences of political preferences, albeit in a fictional setting.
In the domain of internet phenomena, the viral "Unexpected Statistics Owl" meme humorously encapsulates the delight of uncovering surprising correlations, albeit in a lighthearted and whimsical manner. Furthermore, the "Confused Locker Room Guy" meme provides a comedic nod to the unexpected intersections of diverse variables, mirroring the essence of our inquiry with a playful twist.
The diverse array of literature and cultural references offers a rich backdrop for contextualizing our study within both academic and popular discourse, underscoring the multifaceted dimensions of our investigation while infusing elements of whimsy and humor into the scholarly dialogue.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Maryland and The number of locker room attendants in Maryland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2018
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Counting the Votes: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Maryland and the Employment of Locker Room Attendants
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing question of the potential correlation between Democrat votes for senators in Maryland and the number of locker room attendants employed in the state. Leveraging data from reputable sources such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we set out to uncover any hidden ties between political preferences and locker room staffing. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a significant correlation coefficient of 0.9110373, with a p-value less than 0.05, was unveiled for the time frame spanning from 2003 to 2018. The results of our study provide compelling insights into the realm of political dynamics and workforce trends, shedding new light on the unanticipated interplay between political choices and employment practices within the state of Maryland.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of statistical analysis, it's often a game of connecting the dots, even if they seem unrelated at first glance. This study delves into the curious case of the potential relationship between Democrat votes for senators in Maryland and the employment of locker room attendants. While one might initially raise an eyebrow at the seemingly disparate nature of these variables, our investigation seeks to uncover any hidden patterns or curious correlations that may lurk within the data.
The state of Maryland, known for its crab cakes, charming waterfront towns, and a vibrant political landscape, offers an intriguing backdrop for this unlikely association. With its distinctive voter demographics and diverse employment sectors, the Old Line State presents a fertile ground for exploring the interplay between political preferences and labor force compositions. While the mere mention of locker room attendants may conjure images of locker rooms in athletic facilities or leisure centers, there's no denying their presence across a spectrum of establishments, adding an intriguing layer of complexity to this investigation.
Despite the eyebrow-raising nature of this inquiry, it is crucial to approach the analysis with all due seriousness and rigor. We aim to bring to light any potential insights with a keen eye for statistical significance, steering clear of any leaping to hasty conclusions or spinning mere correlations into causation. With this analytical posture in mind, we embark on our empirical voyage, poised to unravel any unforeseen connections in the nexus of political preferences and labor market dynamics.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Data Collection:
In the pursuit of unraveling the enigmatic linkage between Democrat votes for senators in Maryland and the employment of locker room attendants, a meticulously crafted approach was implemented to gather the requisite data. Leveraging information from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our team underwent a veritable scavenger hunt across the vast expanse of the internet. Sorting through mountains of digital haystacks, we meticulously extracted the necessary nuggets of numerical gold, sifting through the data from 2003 to 2018 with an unwavering commitment to precision.
Democrat Votes for Senators:
The quantification of Democrat votes for senators in Maryland constituted a crucial facet of our investigative endeavor. Poring over voting records and election statistics with a fervor akin to a detective hot on the trail, we amassed a comprehensive and unassailable bounty of political preference data. The harmonious marriage of mathematical precision and political intrigue formed the cornerstone of our analytical foundation.
Employment of Locker Room Attendants:
The employment status of locker room attendants within the state of Maryland served as the other cardinal pillar of our analytical edifice. Drawing from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we ventured into the labyrinthine corridors of employment figures, unearthing the intricate tapestry of workforce compositions. With an almost Sherlockian zeal for detail, we meticulously documented the headcount of locker room attendants, leaving no stone unturned in our pursuit of statistical truth.
Statistical Analysis:
A veritable symphony of statistical tools and methodologies was harnessed to distill wisdom from the amalgamation of political and employment data. Intimate companions such as correlations, regression analyses, and hypothesis testing strolled hand-in-hand through the stately halls of data, allowing us to scrutinize the subtle nuances of the relationship between Democrat votes and locker room attendant employment. Amidst this statistical gala, the aim was to unearth any discernible patterns or trends, even if they lay obscured beneath the veneer of initial incongruity.
Assumptions and Limitations:
In every odyssey of empirical exploration, there exist the twin specters of assumptions and limitations. While our rigorous approach endeavored to minimize the influence of extraneous factors, the inherent nature of observational data precludes the definitive establishment of causality. Furthermore, the idiosyncratic nature of political and workforce dynamics within Maryland evokes a healthy sense of humility in the face of the complex web of societal influences. Additionally, the absence of qualitative exploration and contextual factors constrains the depth of our analysis, indicating avenues for future inquiry to illuminate the intricacies of this unanticipated nexus.
Ethical Considerations:
As custodians of data and champions of intellectual probity, ethical considerations were meticulously woven into the fabric of our research. With the utmost regard for data privacy and integrity, we navigated the labyrinth of informational treasure troves, adhering to ethical guidelines and cultivating a deep respect for the trust vested in the custodians of data. Our unwavering commitment to ethical conduct remains an indelible hallmark of our scholarly pursuit.
In summation, the methodology espoused in this study stands as a testament to the fortitude of statistical inquiry and the allure of uncovering tantalizing connections in the most unexpected of domains. Through the convergence of methodical rigor and the intrepid spirit of inquiry, we embolden our quest to unearth jewels of insight, even if they shimmer in the unlikely terrain of political preferences and locker room attendant employment.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Maryland and The number of locker room attendants in Maryland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .
For the time period 2003 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.9110373, r-squared of 0.8299890, and p < 0.05.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Counting the Votes: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Maryland and the Employment of Locker Room Attendants
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing question of the potential correlation between Democrat votes for senators in Maryland and the number of locker room attendants employed in the state. Leveraging data from reputable sources such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we set out to uncover any hidden ties between political preferences and locker room staffing. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a significant correlation coefficient of 0.9110373, with a p-value less than 0.05, was unveiled for the time frame spanning from 2003 to 2018. The results of our study provide compelling insights into the realm of political dynamics and workforce trends, shedding new light on the unanticipated interplay between political choices and employment practices within the state of Maryland.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the realm of statistical analysis, it's often a game of connecting the dots, even if they seem unrelated at first glance. This study delves into the curious case of the potential relationship between Democrat votes for senators in Maryland and the employment of locker room attendants. While one might initially raise an eyebrow at the seemingly disparate nature of these variables, our investigation seeks to uncover any hidden patterns or curious correlations that may lurk within the data.
The state of Maryland, known for its crab cakes, charming waterfront towns, and a vibrant political landscape, offers an intriguing backdrop for this unlikely association. With its distinctive voter demographics and diverse employment sectors, the Old Line State presents a fertile ground for exploring the interplay between political preferences and labor force compositions. While the mere mention of locker room attendants may conjure images of locker rooms in athletic facilities or leisure centers, there's no denying their presence across a spectrum of establishments, adding an intriguing layer of complexity to this investigation.
Despite the eyebrow-raising nature of this inquiry, it is crucial to approach the analysis with all due seriousness and rigor. We aim to bring to light any potential insights with a keen eye for statistical significance, steering clear of any leaping to hasty conclusions or spinning mere correlations into causation. With this analytical posture in mind, we embark on our empirical voyage, poised to unravel any unforeseen connections in the nexus of political preferences and labor market dynamics.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis yielded a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9110373 between Democrat votes for senators in Maryland and the number of employed locker room attendants. This strong positive correlation insinuates a tight relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, pointing to a surprising link between political leanings and workforce composition within the state.
The coefficient of determination (R-squared) further reinforced the robustness of this relationship, standing at 0.8299890. For those unfamiliar with the intricacies of R-squared, it essentially denotes the proportion of the variance in the number of locker room attendants that can be explained by variations in Democrat votes for senators. In this case, it suggests that a whopping 83% of the fluctuations in locker room attendant employment can be attributed to changes in Democrat votes for senators. Let that sink in for a moment - who would have thought that the rhythm of the political arena could sway the staffing levels in locker rooms across Maryland so decisively?
In accordance with the conventional threshold of statistical significance (p < 0.05), the p-value for this correlation stands as a testament to its credibility. This means that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship between Democrat votes for senators and the number of locker room attendants by sheer random chance is less than 5%. In other words, the probability of this connection being a fluke is quite slim, and the findings can be considered as a meaningful revelation rather than a mere statistical quirk.
Now, as they say, "a picture is worth a thousand words." Fig. 1 vividly encapsulates the overwhelming association uncovered by our analysis. The scatterplot graphically portrays the clustering of data points, illustrating the remarkable alignment between Democrat votes for senators and the count of locker room attendants. It's quite a sight to behold - who knew that the ebb and flow of the political tides could mirror the fluctuations in the towel-fluffing and locker-minding workforce?
The implications of these findings extend far beyond the mundane corridors of statistical analysis. They serve as a reminder that interconnections exist where we least expect them, and that the influence of political dynamics permeates even the most unassuming corners of the labor market. Our results offer a lens into the peculiar dance between political inclinations and occupational demographics, yielding fresh insights into the complex fabric of societal interactions. This unanticipated correlation between Democrat votes for senators and the employment of locker room attendants underscores the enigmatic synergy lurking beneath the surface of seemingly disjointed variables.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Maryland and The number of locker room attendants in Maryland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Counting the Votes: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Maryland and the Employment of Locker Room Attendants
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing question of the potential correlation between Democrat votes for senators in Maryland and the number of locker room attendants employed in the state. Leveraging data from reputable sources such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we set out to uncover any hidden ties between political preferences and locker room staffing. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a significant correlation coefficient of 0.9110373, with a p-value less than 0.05, was unveiled for the time frame spanning from 2003 to 2018. The results of our study provide compelling insights into the realm of political dynamics and workforce trends, shedding new light on the unanticipated interplay between political choices and employment practices within the state of Maryland.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Political Preferences and Employment Trends: An Analysis of Maryland's Workforce Dynamics," Smith (2015) explores the relationship between political preferences and workforce compositions in the state of Maryland. While the focus of the study is primarily on broader industry sectors, the findings offer valuable insights into the potential interplay between political dynamics and labor market trends. The work of Doe (2017) in "Election Data Analysis: Patterns and Predictions" further contributes to this area of inquiry, emphasizing the need for an integrated approach encompassing demographic voting patterns and employment demographics.
Delving deeper into the realm of labor force dynamics, Jones (2018) analyzes the occupational composition of Maryland, shedding light on the distribution of employment across various occupations. Although the study does not explicitly delve into political correlations, its comprehensive overview of workforce structures provides a foundation for examining potential connections between political preferences and specific occupations.
Turning to the broader literature, "The Economics of Voting: Studies in Rational Choice Behavior" by Johnson and Smith (2004) offers insights into the rationality and motivations underlying voter behavior. While the focus of the book pertains to economic theories of voting, its exploration of decision-making processes within the political sphere may offer valuable parallels to the present study. In a similar vein, "Political Economy: Theories and Case Studies" by Anderson (2012) delves into the intricate intersection of political and economic phenomena, presenting a rich tapestry of theoretical frameworks that may inform our examination of political-employment correlations.
Expanding the scope to fiction works with potential relevance to our study, "The Polling Paradox" by Novelist (2016) presents a satirical portrayal of the confluence of political polling and unexpected correlations, offering a lighthearted take on the enigma of statistical relationships. Similarly, "The Curious Case of the Counted Votes" by Storyteller (2009) weaves a whimsical narrative around the unexpected consequences of political preferences, albeit in a fictional setting.
In the domain of internet phenomena, the viral "Unexpected Statistics Owl" meme humorously encapsulates the delight of uncovering surprising correlations, albeit in a lighthearted and whimsical manner. Furthermore, the "Confused Locker Room Guy" meme provides a comedic nod to the unexpected intersections of diverse variables, mirroring the essence of our inquiry with a playful twist.
The diverse array of literature and cultural references offers a rich backdrop for contextualizing our study within both academic and popular discourse, underscoring the multifaceted dimensions of our investigation while infusing elements of whimsy and humor into the scholarly dialogue.
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis yielded a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9110373 between Democrat votes for senators in Maryland and the number of employed locker room attendants. This strong positive correlation insinuates a tight relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, pointing to a surprising link between political leanings and workforce composition within the state.
The coefficient of determination (R-squared) further reinforced the robustness of this relationship, standing at 0.8299890. For those unfamiliar with the intricacies of R-squared, it essentially denotes the proportion of the variance in the number of locker room attendants that can be explained by variations in Democrat votes for senators. In this case, it suggests that a whopping 83% of the fluctuations in locker room attendant employment can be attributed to changes in Democrat votes for senators. Let that sink in for a moment - who would have thought that the rhythm of the political arena could sway the staffing levels in locker rooms across Maryland so decisively?
In accordance with the conventional threshold of statistical significance (p < 0.05), the p-value for this correlation stands as a testament to its credibility. This means that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship between Democrat votes for senators and the number of locker room attendants by sheer random chance is less than 5%. In other words, the probability of this connection being a fluke is quite slim, and the findings can be considered as a meaningful revelation rather than a mere statistical quirk.
Now, as they say, "a picture is worth a thousand words." Fig. 1 vividly encapsulates the overwhelming association uncovered by our analysis. The scatterplot graphically portrays the clustering of data points, illustrating the remarkable alignment between Democrat votes for senators and the count of locker room attendants. It's quite a sight to behold - who knew that the ebb and flow of the political tides could mirror the fluctuations in the towel-fluffing and locker-minding workforce?
The implications of these findings extend far beyond the mundane corridors of statistical analysis. They serve as a reminder that interconnections exist where we least expect them, and that the influence of political dynamics permeates even the most unassuming corners of the labor market. Our results offer a lens into the peculiar dance between political inclinations and occupational demographics, yielding fresh insights into the complex fabric of societal interactions. This unanticipated correlation between Democrat votes for senators and the employment of locker room attendants underscores the enigmatic synergy lurking beneath the surface of seemingly disjointed variables.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Our investigation into the connection between Democrat votes for senators in Maryland and the employment of locker room attendants has illuminated a compelling association that transcends conventional expectations. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9110373 and an R-squared value of 0.8299890, the statistical significance of the relationship cannot be dismissed as a mere statistical hiccup. The interplay between political preferences and the staffing levels in locker rooms across Maryland is not a mere happenstance but an intriguing revelation that commands attention.
The findings of our study echo the insights put forth by Smith (2015), who alluded to the potential interdependence of political dynamics and labor market trends. Although it may seem preposterous at first glance, the correlation between political leanings and the number of locker room attendants aligns with the premise that political choices could impinge upon the fabric of occupational compositions. This unexpected synchronicity between Democrat votes for senators and the count of locker room attendants lends credence to the whimsical narratives portrayed in "The Polling Paradox" (Novelist, 2016) and "The Curious Case of the Counted Votes" (Storyteller, 2009), highlighting the far-reaching implications of political predilections on seemingly disparate variables.
The high degree of correlation unearthed in our analysis effectively dismisses any notion of happenstance or fluke. The p-value of less than 0.05 attests to the robustness of this relationship, reinforcing the veracity of the connection between political choices and workforce structures. It may seem befuddling at first, but the scatterplot encapsulates the arresting alignment between Democrat votes for senators and the count of locker room attendants, painting a vivid picture of the unanticipated synergy between the political arena and the humdrum world of locker room attendants.
While it may elicit a wry smile or a raised eyebrow, the implications of our findings extend beyond the realm of statistical arcana. This correlation serves as a poignant reminder that concealed interdependencies can wield an influence far beyond our initial expectations. In the grand tapestry of societal interactions, the enigmatic dance between political inclinations and occupational compositions adds a layer of complexity that defies facile explanations.
In conclusion, our study unearths a connection that not only challenges conventional assumptions but also underscores the indelible imprint of political predilections on the minutiae of workforce structures. As we delve into the intricacies of this correlation, we are reminded that in the labyrinthine corridors of statistical analysis, unexpected encounters with offbeat correlations can infuse a whisper of whimsy into the rigors of academic inquiry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in Maryland and The number of locker room attendants in Maryland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Counting the Votes: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Maryland and the Employment of Locker Room Attendants
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing question of the potential correlation between Democrat votes for senators in Maryland and the number of locker room attendants employed in the state. Leveraging data from reputable sources such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we set out to uncover any hidden ties between political preferences and locker room staffing. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a significant correlation coefficient of 0.9110373, with a p-value less than 0.05, was unveiled for the time frame spanning from 2003 to 2018. The results of our study provide compelling insights into the realm of political dynamics and workforce trends, shedding new light on the unanticipated interplay between political choices and employment practices within the state of Maryland.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the realm of statistical analysis, it's often a game of connecting the dots, even if they seem unrelated at first glance. This study delves into the curious case of the potential relationship between Democrat votes for senators in Maryland and the employment of locker room attendants. While one might initially raise an eyebrow at the seemingly disparate nature of these variables, our investigation seeks to uncover any hidden patterns or curious correlations that may lurk within the data.
The state of Maryland, known for its crab cakes, charming waterfront towns, and a vibrant political landscape, offers an intriguing backdrop for this unlikely association. With its distinctive voter demographics and diverse employment sectors, the Old Line State presents a fertile ground for exploring the interplay between political preferences and labor force compositions. While the mere mention of locker room attendants may conjure images of locker rooms in athletic facilities or leisure centers, there's no denying their presence across a spectrum of establishments, adding an intriguing layer of complexity to this investigation.
Despite the eyebrow-raising nature of this inquiry, it is crucial to approach the analysis with all due seriousness and rigor. We aim to bring to light any potential insights with a keen eye for statistical significance, steering clear of any leaping to hasty conclusions or spinning mere correlations into causation. With this analytical posture in mind, we embark on our empirical voyage, poised to unravel any unforeseen connections in the nexus of political preferences and labor market dynamics.
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis yielded a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9110373 between Democrat votes for senators in Maryland and the number of employed locker room attendants. This strong positive correlation insinuates a tight relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, pointing to a surprising link between political leanings and workforce composition within the state.
The coefficient of determination (R-squared) further reinforced the robustness of this relationship, standing at 0.8299890. For those unfamiliar with the intricacies of R-squared, it essentially denotes the proportion of the variance in the number of locker room attendants that can be explained by variations in Democrat votes for senators. In this case, it suggests that a whopping 83% of the fluctuations in locker room attendant employment can be attributed to changes in Democrat votes for senators. Let that sink in for a moment - who would have thought that the rhythm of the political arena could sway the staffing levels in locker rooms across Maryland so decisively?
In accordance with the conventional threshold of statistical significance (p < 0.05), the p-value for this correlation stands as a testament to its credibility. This means that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship between Democrat votes for senators and the number of locker room attendants by sheer random chance is less than 5%. In other words, the probability of this connection being a fluke is quite slim, and the findings can be considered as a meaningful revelation rather than a mere statistical quirk.
Now, as they say, "a picture is worth a thousand words." Fig. 1 vividly encapsulates the overwhelming association uncovered by our analysis. The scatterplot graphically portrays the clustering of data points, illustrating the remarkable alignment between Democrat votes for senators and the count of locker room attendants. It's quite a sight to behold - who knew that the ebb and flow of the political tides could mirror the fluctuations in the towel-fluffing and locker-minding workforce?
The implications of these findings extend far beyond the mundane corridors of statistical analysis. They serve as a reminder that interconnections exist where we least expect them, and that the influence of political dynamics permeates even the most unassuming corners of the labor market. Our results offer a lens into the peculiar dance between political inclinations and occupational demographics, yielding fresh insights into the complex fabric of societal interactions. This unanticipated correlation between Democrat votes for senators and the employment of locker room attendants underscores the enigmatic synergy lurking beneath the surface of seemingly disjointed variables.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our investigation into the intriguing relationship between Democrat votes for senators in Maryland and the employment of locker room attendants has yielded compelling and thought-provoking results. The staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9110373, along with a strikingly low p-value, unequivocally underscores the substantive link between these ostensibly unrelated variables. It's remarkable to contemplate the web of connections that underpins our societal tapestry, where the political pulse resonates in the staffing levels of locker rooms.
While the allure of causation may beckon from the shadows of correlation, we exercise due caution in interpreting our findings. The nuances and intricacies of such associations are not to be hastily distilled into simplistic narratives. Instead, they offer a beacon for further exploration and contemplation, a statistical puzzle that teases the inquisitive mind.
These unexpected ties between political proclivities and employment patterns serve as a splendid showcase of the serendipitous discoveries that statistics can unveil. It's as if the fabric of democracy weaves itself into the everyday fabric of our workplaces, creating a tableau of interplay that defies conventional wisdom. The statistical dance between Democrat votes and locker room attendants may seem like an odd duet, but it underscores the multifaceted nature of data relationships and the whimsical caprices of statistical intrigue.
In light of these findings, we assert with confidence that further research endeavors in this vein would be akin to carrying coal to Newcastle. The resonance of our results resounds as a testament to the fruitful pastures of statistical exploration. It's time to hang our hats and towels on this particular inquiry, satisfied in having shed light on this unexpected nexus in the domain of political dynamics and workforce trends within the state of Maryland.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Counting the Votes: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Maryland and the Employment of Locker Room Attendants. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
Journal of Political Statistics and Unusual Correlations
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Counting the Votes: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Maryland and the Employment of Locker Room Attendants. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Center for Political Hygiene Research
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Counting the Votes: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Maryland and the Employment of Locker Room Attendants with an abstract of This study delves into the intriguing question of the potential correlation between Democrat votes for senators in Maryland and the number of locker room attendants employed in the state. Leveraging data from reputable sources such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we set out to uncover any hidden ties between political preferences and locker room staffing. Through rigorous statistical analysis, a significant correlation coefficient of 0.9110373, with a p-value less than 0.05, was unveiled for the time frame spanning from 2003 to 2018. The results of our study provide compelling insights into the realm of political dynamics and workforce trends, shedding new light on the unanticipated interplay between political choices and employment practices within the state of Maryland.
ChatGPT:
"Democrat votes Maryland senators, Locker room attendants employment, Statistical analysis correlation, MIT Election Data Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Political preferences employment correlation, Workforce trends Maryland"
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Votes for Democratic Senators in MarylandDetailed data title: Percentage of votes cast for Federal Democrat Senate candidates in Maryland
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Democratic Senators in Maryland
The number of locker room attendants in Maryland
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of locker room, coatroom, and dressing room attendants in Maryland
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of locker room attendants in Maryland
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8299890 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 83% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of locker room attendants in Maryland) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Democratic Senators in Maryland) over the 6 years from 2003 through 2018.
p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.012. 0.0115195025234476350000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 1.2% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 87 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.38, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004 | 2006 | 2010 | 2012 | 2016 | 2018 | |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Maryland (Percentage of votes) | 64.8034 | 54.2056 | 62.1976 | 55.9779 | 60.8879 | 64.8559 |
The number of locker room attendants in Maryland (Laborers) | 510 | 200 | 300 | 210 | 300 | 430 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
- Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([64.8034,54.2056,62.1976,55.9779,60.8879,64.8559,])
array_2 = np.array([510,200,300,210,300,430,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Democratic Senators in Maryland"
array_2_name = "The number of locker room attendants in Maryland"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Votes for Democratic Senators in Maryland
- Line chart for only The number of locker room attendants in Maryland
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Counting the Votes: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in Maryland and the Employment of Locker Room Attendants
Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!
Correlation ID: 5639 · Black Variable ID: 26398 · Red Variable ID: 9210