about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,638 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Rhode Island and the second variable is Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more people embraced the idea of minimal government intervention, it inadvertently led to a laissez-faire attitude in the automotive industry. Without strict regulations, car manufacturers began cutting corners, resulting in a surge of faulty airbags. It's a classic case of political beliefs inflating the problem!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A photo-realistic image ] In this scene, we see an idyllic fall landscape in Rhode Island. The leaves of the trees are painted in vivid shades of red, orange, and yellow, capturing the essence of autumn. A ballot box labeled "Libertarian Presidential Candidate Votes" stands prominently in the foreground, its sleek design contrasting with the natural beauty of the surrounding foliage. In the distance, a dimly lit parking lot reveals a fleet of cars with deflated airbags, each marked "Automotive Recalls." The neglected vehicles serve as a striking visual representation of the potential consequences of minimal government oversight, adding a thought-provoking layer to the tranquil scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Rhode Island and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A photo-realistic image Low poly Celtic art a funny image you would see on reddit An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Rhode Island and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags, in the following situation: As more people embraced the idea of minimal government intervention, it inadvertently led to a laissez-faire attitude in the automotive industry. Without strict regulations, car manufacturers began cutting corners, resulting in a surge of faulty airbags. It's a classic case of political beliefs inflating the problem!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Rhode Island, amidst a backdrop of fall foliage, a ballot box labeled "Libertarian Presidential Candidate Votes" stands in a tranquil scene. At the same time, a fleet of cars with deflated airbags, marked "Automotive Recalls," sit neglected in a dimly lit parking lot, showcasing the consequence of minimal government oversight.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In Rhode Island, amidst a backdrop of fall foliage, a ballot box labeled "Libertarian Presidential Candidate Votes" stands in a tranquil scene. At the same time, a fleet of cars with deflated airbags, marked "Automotive Recalls," sit neglected in a dimly lit parking lot, showcasing the consequence of minimal government oversight. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A photo-realistic image ] In this scene, we see an idyllic fall landscape in Rhode Island. The leaves of the trees are painted in vivid shades of red, orange, and yellow, capturing the essence of autumn. A ballot box labeled "Libertarian Presidential Candidate Votes" stands prominently in the foreground, its sleek design contrasting with the natural beauty of the surrounding foliage. In the distance, a dimly lit parking lot reveals a fleet of cars with deflated airbags, each marked "Automotive Recalls." The neglected vehicles serve as a striking visual representation of the potential consequences of minimal government oversight, adding a thought-provoking layer to the tranquil scene.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Rhode Island caused Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Air Bags and Ballots: Exploring the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Rhode Island and Automotive Recalls

The Journal of Political and Vehicular Dynamics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Rhode Island and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9556889 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Air Bags and Ballots: Exploring the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Rhode Island and Automotive Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing and unexpected relationship between the number of votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Rhode Island and the occurrences of automotive recalls specifically related to issues with air bags. Using data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9556889 (p < 0.01) was identified for the time period spanning from 1990 to 2020. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also inflate the importance of considering political preferences as an unexpected indicator for automotive safety concerns. This paper presents the first empirical evidence of an amusing and seemingly implausible connection between political leanings and vehicular safety features. We invite readers to buckle up as we unravel the unexpected interplay between ballot choices and automotive recalls.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Rhode Island and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Air Bags and Ballots: Exploring the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Rhode Island and Automotive Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing and unexpected relationship between the number of votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Rhode Island and the occurrences of automotive recalls specifically related to issues with air bags. Using data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9556889 (p < 0.01) was identified for the time period spanning from 1990 to 2020. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also inflate the importance of considering political preferences as an unexpected indicator for automotive safety concerns. This paper presents the first empirical evidence of an amusing and seemingly implausible connection between political leanings and vehicular safety features. We invite readers to buckle up as we unravel the unexpected interplay between ballot choices and automotive recalls.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The interplay between politics and automotive safety has been the subject of numerous studies and debates. Yet, few have explored the seemingly unlikely relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Rhode Island and automotive recalls specific to air bag issues. At first glance, one may dismiss this as a hare-brained idea, akin to trying to find a correlation between the phases of the moon and the number of speeding tickets issued in a small town. However, as we delve into the depths of this peculiar association, we uncover a tantalizing tango between political inclinations and vehicular safety features.

This study seeks to shed light on the possibility of an unexpected connection between these variables—voting behavior and automotive recalls—that, like a well-timed air bag, may cushion our understanding of the broader societal dynamics at play. This is not merely an exercise in statistical acrobatics, but a quest to unravel the enigmatic dance between democracy and automotive prowess, two seemingly disparate domains that may, against all odds, share a tune.

As we embark on this scholarly expedition, we invite readers to fasten their seatbelts for a journey that promises to defy convention and inflate our appreciation for the quirky, and at times, whimsical nature of correlation studies. With tongue firmly planted in cheek, we set out to present the empirical evidence of an unexpected linkage that challenges conventional wisdom and injects a dash of audacity into the otherwise solemn corridors of academic inquiry. Let the data-driven revelry begin!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Rhode Island and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Air Bags and Ballots: Exploring the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Rhode Island and Automotive Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing and unexpected relationship between the number of votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Rhode Island and the occurrences of automotive recalls specifically related to issues with air bags. Using data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9556889 (p < 0.01) was identified for the time period spanning from 1990 to 2020. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also inflate the importance of considering political preferences as an unexpected indicator for automotive safety concerns. This paper presents the first empirical evidence of an amusing and seemingly implausible connection between political leanings and vehicular safety features. We invite readers to buckle up as we unravel the unexpected interplay between ballot choices and automotive recalls.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The interplay between politics and automotive safety has been the subject of numerous studies and debates. Yet, few have explored the seemingly unlikely relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Rhode Island and automotive recalls specific to air bag issues. At first glance, one may dismiss this as a hare-brained idea, akin to trying to find a correlation between the phases of the moon and the number of speeding tickets issued in a small town. However, as we delve into the depths of this peculiar association, we uncover a tantalizing tango between political inclinations and vehicular safety features.
This study seeks to shed light on the possibility of an unexpected connection between these variables—voting behavior and automotive recalls—that, like a well-timed air bag, may cushion our understanding of the broader societal dynamics at play. This is not merely an exercise in statistical acrobatics, but a quest to unravel the enigmatic dance between democracy and automotive prowess, two seemingly disparate domains that may, against all odds, share a tune.
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, we invite readers to fasten their seatbelts for a journey that promises to defy convention and inflate our appreciation for the quirky, and at times, whimsical nature of correlation studies. With tongue firmly planted in cheek, we set out to present the empirical evidence of an unexpected linkage that challenges conventional wisdom and injects a dash of audacity into the otherwise solemn corridors of academic inquiry. Let the data-driven revelry begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their study, Smith and Jones (2005) examine the correlation between political voting behavior and automotive safety concerns, focusing specifically on the Libertarian votes in Rhode Island and occurrences of automotive recalls related to air bag issues. They demonstrate a statistically significant relationship between these variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.72 (p < 0.05), suggesting a potential association that warrants further exploration.

Building on this, Doe et al. (2010) delve into the societal implications of political preferences on automotive safety, positing a theoretical framework that integrates political ideology with vehicular safety concerns. Their findings elucidate the nuanced interplay between libertarian leanings and air bag-related recalls, challenging prior assumptions and sparking curiosity about the underlying mechanisms at play.

Moreover, the work of Johnson and Smith (2018) contributes to the emerging literature on this topic by examining the temporal dynamics of libertarian votes and automotive recalls, uncovering intriguing patterns that hint at a deeper connection between political choices and vehicular safety features.

In "The Economics of Politics and the Politics of Economics" by Doe (2015), the author tangentially addresses the influence of political ideologies on economic decisions, providing a theoretical backdrop for understanding the potential ramifications of political leanings on regulatory frameworks in the automotive industry.

Similarly, "Drive to Freedom: A Libertarian Manifesto" by Libertarian (2017) offers insights into the libertarian mindset and its potential implications for various aspects of society, including automotive safety standards. While not a scholarly work, the book's perspectives contribute to the broader understanding of libertarian ideals and their implications on societal systems.

On a more fictional note, "Air Bags and Anarchists" by Novelist (2013) presents a dystopian tale where political upheaval intertwines with technological malfunctions, including air bag failures, raising speculative questions about the potential consequences of political disruptions on automotive safety.

Diverging from conventional academic sources, the researcher has meticulously examined CVS receipts from various locations in Rhode Island, observing curious patterns in consumer purchases and attempted to draw tangential inferences about the relationship between political preferences and automotive recalls. Despite its unconventional nature, this "study" serves to underscore the zealous pursuit of uncovering correlations in the unlikeliest of places.

It appears that the literature surrounding the connection between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Rhode Island and automotive recalls for issues with the air bags is more than just hot air. While the initial premise may raise eyebrows, the collective body of work demonstrates the genuine interest and inquiry into this surprising relationship.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Rhode Island and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT . You used data from 1990 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Air Bags and Ballots: Exploring the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Rhode Island and Automotive Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing and unexpected relationship between the number of votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Rhode Island and the occurrences of automotive recalls specifically related to issues with air bags. Using data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9556889 (p < 0.01) was identified for the time period spanning from 1990 to 2020. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also inflate the importance of considering political preferences as an unexpected indicator for automotive safety concerns. This paper presents the first empirical evidence of an amusing and seemingly implausible connection between political leanings and vehicular safety features. We invite readers to buckle up as we unravel the unexpected interplay between ballot choices and automotive recalls.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The interplay between politics and automotive safety has been the subject of numerous studies and debates. Yet, few have explored the seemingly unlikely relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Rhode Island and automotive recalls specific to air bag issues. At first glance, one may dismiss this as a hare-brained idea, akin to trying to find a correlation between the phases of the moon and the number of speeding tickets issued in a small town. However, as we delve into the depths of this peculiar association, we uncover a tantalizing tango between political inclinations and vehicular safety features.
This study seeks to shed light on the possibility of an unexpected connection between these variables—voting behavior and automotive recalls—that, like a well-timed air bag, may cushion our understanding of the broader societal dynamics at play. This is not merely an exercise in statistical acrobatics, but a quest to unravel the enigmatic dance between democracy and automotive prowess, two seemingly disparate domains that may, against all odds, share a tune.
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, we invite readers to fasten their seatbelts for a journey that promises to defy convention and inflate our appreciation for the quirky, and at times, whimsical nature of correlation studies. With tongue firmly planted in cheek, we set out to present the empirical evidence of an unexpected linkage that challenges conventional wisdom and injects a dash of audacity into the otherwise solemn corridors of academic inquiry. Let the data-driven revelry begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
The data for this study were collected from various sources, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation. Our research team scoured the depths of the internet, sifting through vast troves of digital information like intrepid explorers seeking the elusive treasure of statistical significance. We must confess, much like panning for gold, our data mining expedition involved sifting through copious amounts of digital debris before striking the mother lode of informative nuggets.

Variables:
The main independent variable of interest in this study was the number of votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Rhode Island, serving as a quirky proxy for political leanings in the smallest state with the biggest heart. The dependent variable, automotive recalls related to air bag issues, gave us the opportunity to delve into the "inflationary" aspects of vehicular safety concerns. The relationship between these variables promised to reveal an unexpected synergy, much like finding a harmonious melody in an unlikely musical mash-up.

Statistical Analysis:
To explore the relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, we employed a series of robust statistical analyses, akin to flexing the mental muscles of our analytical toolkit. We calculated correlation coefficients, delved into regression models, and navigated through the whimsical world of statistical significance. The aim was to unravel the intricate dance between political inclinations and automotive hiccups, much like untangling a complex riddle that promised to be as amusing as it was enlightening.

Time Frame:
The temporal scope of this study spanned from 1990 to 2020, providing a historical panorama against which we could map the ebbs and flows of both political preferences and automotive safety concerns. This generous time frame allowed us to capture the evolution of voting patterns and recall occurrences, akin to observing the subtle shifts in an ever-changing landscape of statistical peculiarities.

Limitations:
As with any scholarly endeavor, this study is not without limitations. The use of proxy measures for political leanings and the specific focus on air bag-related automotive recalls introduce potential for confounding variables and mirthful misunderstandings. Nevertheless, we approached these limitations with a sense of scholarly curiosity, recognizing that even in the face of analytical challenges, the pursuit of knowledge can be both intellectually stimulating and slightly comical.

In summary, our research methodology aimed to capture the essence of this peculiar relationship between votes and recalls, securing a firm grip on the statistical reins while riding the whimsical wave of empirical inquiry. The methods employed in this study reflect our earnest attempt to bring to light an unexpected linkage that, much like a well-crafted joke, challenges preconceived notions and tickles the curious intellectual palate.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Rhode Island and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT .

For the time period 1990 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9556889, r-squared of 0.9133413, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Air Bags and Ballots: Exploring the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Rhode Island and Automotive Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing and unexpected relationship between the number of votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Rhode Island and the occurrences of automotive recalls specifically related to issues with air bags. Using data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9556889 (p < 0.01) was identified for the time period spanning from 1990 to 2020. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also inflate the importance of considering political preferences as an unexpected indicator for automotive safety concerns. This paper presents the first empirical evidence of an amusing and seemingly implausible connection between political leanings and vehicular safety features. We invite readers to buckle up as we unravel the unexpected interplay between ballot choices and automotive recalls.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The interplay between politics and automotive safety has been the subject of numerous studies and debates. Yet, few have explored the seemingly unlikely relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Rhode Island and automotive recalls specific to air bag issues. At first glance, one may dismiss this as a hare-brained idea, akin to trying to find a correlation between the phases of the moon and the number of speeding tickets issued in a small town. However, as we delve into the depths of this peculiar association, we uncover a tantalizing tango between political inclinations and vehicular safety features.
This study seeks to shed light on the possibility of an unexpected connection between these variables—voting behavior and automotive recalls—that, like a well-timed air bag, may cushion our understanding of the broader societal dynamics at play. This is not merely an exercise in statistical acrobatics, but a quest to unravel the enigmatic dance between democracy and automotive prowess, two seemingly disparate domains that may, against all odds, share a tune.
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, we invite readers to fasten their seatbelts for a journey that promises to defy convention and inflate our appreciation for the quirky, and at times, whimsical nature of correlation studies. With tongue firmly planted in cheek, we set out to present the empirical evidence of an unexpected linkage that challenges conventional wisdom and injects a dash of audacity into the otherwise solemn corridors of academic inquiry. Let the data-driven revelry begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In analyzing the data collected from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, a striking correlation was revealed between the number of votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Rhode Island and the occurrences of automotive recalls specifically related to issues with air bags. The correlation coefficient of 0.9556889 and an r-squared of 0.9133413 indicated a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the statistical analysis shouted, "Air bags and ballots, fasten your seatbelts, we're in for a wild ride!"

The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidified the significance of this finding, leaving little room for doubt that the relationship was not a mere statistical fluke. The probability of this association occurring by chance is statistically negligible, much like the chances of finding a politician without a well-crafted speech.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) graphically illustrates the robust correlation between the number of votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate and the occurrences of automotive recalls related to air bag issues. The dots on the scatterplot align so neatly, it's almost as if the data points were themselves adhering to the stringent safety regulations of an air bag deployment.

This unexpected and amusing correlation challenges conventional expectations and injects a dose of levity into the typically stoic arena of academic research. It's as if the statistical analysis said to us, "You thought politics and air bags were unrelated? Think again, and prepare for a bumpy ride through the whimsical world of statistical surprises!"

The results of this study not only catch the eye but also inflate the significance of considering political preferences as an unlikely yet compelling indicator for automotive safety concerns. This finding, like the timely deployment of an air bag, cushions our understanding of the intricate and often humorous interplay between political leanings and vehicular safety features.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Rhode Island and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Air Bags and Ballots: Exploring the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Rhode Island and Automotive Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing and unexpected relationship between the number of votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Rhode Island and the occurrences of automotive recalls specifically related to issues with air bags. Using data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9556889 (p < 0.01) was identified for the time period spanning from 1990 to 2020. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also inflate the importance of considering political preferences as an unexpected indicator for automotive safety concerns. This paper presents the first empirical evidence of an amusing and seemingly implausible connection between political leanings and vehicular safety features. We invite readers to buckle up as we unravel the unexpected interplay between ballot choices and automotive recalls.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their study, Smith and Jones (2005) examine the correlation between political voting behavior and automotive safety concerns, focusing specifically on the Libertarian votes in Rhode Island and occurrences of automotive recalls related to air bag issues. They demonstrate a statistically significant relationship between these variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.72 (p < 0.05), suggesting a potential association that warrants further exploration.
Building on this, Doe et al. (2010) delve into the societal implications of political preferences on automotive safety, positing a theoretical framework that integrates political ideology with vehicular safety concerns. Their findings elucidate the nuanced interplay between libertarian leanings and air bag-related recalls, challenging prior assumptions and sparking curiosity about the underlying mechanisms at play.
Moreover, the work of Johnson and Smith (2018) contributes to the emerging literature on this topic by examining the temporal dynamics of libertarian votes and automotive recalls, uncovering intriguing patterns that hint at a deeper connection between political choices and vehicular safety features.
In "The Economics of Politics and the Politics of Economics" by Doe (2015), the author tangentially addresses the influence of political ideologies on economic decisions, providing a theoretical backdrop for understanding the potential ramifications of political leanings on regulatory frameworks in the automotive industry.
Similarly, "Drive to Freedom: A Libertarian Manifesto" by Libertarian (2017) offers insights into the libertarian mindset and its potential implications for various aspects of society, including automotive safety standards. While not a scholarly work, the book's perspectives contribute to the broader understanding of libertarian ideals and their implications on societal systems.
On a more fictional note, "Air Bags and Anarchists" by Novelist (2013) presents a dystopian tale where political upheaval intertwines with technological malfunctions, including air bag failures, raising speculative questions about the potential consequences of political disruptions on automotive safety.
Diverging from conventional academic sources, the researcher has meticulously examined CVS receipts from various locations in Rhode Island, observing curious patterns in consumer purchases and attempted to draw tangential inferences about the relationship between political preferences and automotive recalls. Despite its unconventional nature, this "study" serves to underscore the zealous pursuit of uncovering correlations in the unlikeliest of places.
It appears that the literature surrounding the connection between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Rhode Island and automotive recalls for issues with the air bags is more than just hot air. While the initial premise may raise eyebrows, the collective body of work demonstrates the genuine interest and inquiry into this surprising relationship.

[[RESULTS]]
In analyzing the data collected from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, a striking correlation was revealed between the number of votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Rhode Island and the occurrences of automotive recalls specifically related to issues with air bags. The correlation coefficient of 0.9556889 and an r-squared of 0.9133413 indicated a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the statistical analysis shouted, "Air bags and ballots, fasten your seatbelts, we're in for a wild ride!"
The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidified the significance of this finding, leaving little room for doubt that the relationship was not a mere statistical fluke. The probability of this association occurring by chance is statistically negligible, much like the chances of finding a politician without a well-crafted speech.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) graphically illustrates the robust correlation between the number of votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate and the occurrences of automotive recalls related to air bag issues. The dots on the scatterplot align so neatly, it's almost as if the data points were themselves adhering to the stringent safety regulations of an air bag deployment.
This unexpected and amusing correlation challenges conventional expectations and injects a dose of levity into the typically stoic arena of academic research. It's as if the statistical analysis said to us, "You thought politics and air bags were unrelated? Think again, and prepare for a bumpy ride through the whimsical world of statistical surprises!"
The results of this study not only catch the eye but also inflate the significance of considering political preferences as an unlikely yet compelling indicator for automotive safety concerns. This finding, like the timely deployment of an air bag, cushions our understanding of the intricate and often humorous interplay between political leanings and vehicular safety features.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study significantly contribute to the body of knowledge surrounding the amusing and seemingly incongruent relationship between political voting behavior and automotive safety concerns. The results not only confirm, but also inflate the significance of the prior research that hinted at an association between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Rhode Island and automotive recalls for issues with air bags.

The correlation coefficient of 0.9556889 (p < 0.01) observed in this study echoes the prior work of Smith and Jones (2005), who initially highlighted the noteworthy connection between libertarian votes and air bag-related recalls. It's as if the statistical analysis declared, "Hold onto your hypotheses, there's a strong relationship here, and we're not just blowing hot air!" Building on this, the r-squared value of 0.9133413 further supports the robustness of this relationship, akin to the sturdy construction of a well-designed air bag.

The scatterplot depicting the relationship between the number of votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate and automotive recalls related to air bag issues provides a visually compelling representation of this unexpected correlation. The tightly clustered data points serve as a metaphorical roadmap, guiding us through the hitherto uncharted territory where politics and vehicular safety intersect. It's as if the scatterplot itself quipped, "Buckle up, we're about to embark on a statistically significant journey through the amusing world of political predilections and automotive anomalies!"

The statistical significance of the relationship between these variables leaves little room for doubt, much like the absence of hitchhikers on a road trip through the remote corners of statistical analysis. The probability of this association occurring by chance is infinitesimally small, reminiscent of the odds of finding a flat tire in a Formula 1 race.

It is imperative to acknowledge the potential socio-political implications of these findings. The seemingly incongruent connection between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate and automotive recalls for air bag issues challenges conventional wisdom and underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of the interplay between political preferences and regulatory frameworks in the automotive industry. Just as a deftly deployed air bag cushions the impact of a vehicular collision, these findings cushion our assumptions about the unexpected and often whimsical interactions between political leanings and vehicular safety features.

In conclusion, the results of this study not only corroborate the prior research but also inflate the significance of considering political predilections as an intriguing and unexpected indicator for automotive safety concerns. This study underscores the need for continued exploration of the offbeat connections that defy conventional expectations, reminding us that in the realm of statistical phenomena, as in life, sometimes the most unexpected correlations are also the most compelling.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Rhode Island and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Air Bags and Ballots: Exploring the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Rhode Island and Automotive Recalls"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing and unexpected relationship between the number of votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Rhode Island and the occurrences of automotive recalls specifically related to issues with air bags. Using data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9556889 (p < 0.01) was identified for the time period spanning from 1990 to 2020. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also inflate the importance of considering political preferences as an unexpected indicator for automotive safety concerns. This paper presents the first empirical evidence of an amusing and seemingly implausible connection between political leanings and vehicular safety features. We invite readers to buckle up as we unravel the unexpected interplay between ballot choices and automotive recalls.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The interplay between politics and automotive safety has been the subject of numerous studies and debates. Yet, few have explored the seemingly unlikely relationship between votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Rhode Island and automotive recalls specific to air bag issues. At first glance, one may dismiss this as a hare-brained idea, akin to trying to find a correlation between the phases of the moon and the number of speeding tickets issued in a small town. However, as we delve into the depths of this peculiar association, we uncover a tantalizing tango between political inclinations and vehicular safety features.
This study seeks to shed light on the possibility of an unexpected connection between these variables—voting behavior and automotive recalls—that, like a well-timed air bag, may cushion our understanding of the broader societal dynamics at play. This is not merely an exercise in statistical acrobatics, but a quest to unravel the enigmatic dance between democracy and automotive prowess, two seemingly disparate domains that may, against all odds, share a tune.
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, we invite readers to fasten their seatbelts for a journey that promises to defy convention and inflate our appreciation for the quirky, and at times, whimsical nature of correlation studies. With tongue firmly planted in cheek, we set out to present the empirical evidence of an unexpected linkage that challenges conventional wisdom and injects a dash of audacity into the otherwise solemn corridors of academic inquiry. Let the data-driven revelry begin!

[[RESULTS]]
In analyzing the data collected from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, a striking correlation was revealed between the number of votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Rhode Island and the occurrences of automotive recalls specifically related to issues with air bags. The correlation coefficient of 0.9556889 and an r-squared of 0.9133413 indicated a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the statistical analysis shouted, "Air bags and ballots, fasten your seatbelts, we're in for a wild ride!"
The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidified the significance of this finding, leaving little room for doubt that the relationship was not a mere statistical fluke. The probability of this association occurring by chance is statistically negligible, much like the chances of finding a politician without a well-crafted speech.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) graphically illustrates the robust correlation between the number of votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate and the occurrences of automotive recalls related to air bag issues. The dots on the scatterplot align so neatly, it's almost as if the data points were themselves adhering to the stringent safety regulations of an air bag deployment.
This unexpected and amusing correlation challenges conventional expectations and injects a dose of levity into the typically stoic arena of academic research. It's as if the statistical analysis said to us, "You thought politics and air bags were unrelated? Think again, and prepare for a bumpy ride through the whimsical world of statistical surprises!"
The results of this study not only catch the eye but also inflate the significance of considering political preferences as an unlikely yet compelling indicator for automotive safety concerns. This finding, like the timely deployment of an air bag, cushions our understanding of the intricate and often humorous interplay between political leanings and vehicular safety features.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

The results of this study undeniably point to a remarkably strong and statistically significant correlation between Libertarian votes in Rhode Island and automotive recalls for air bag issues. It appears that the political preferences of Ocean State residents are resonating with automotive engineers in ways we never imagined. It's as if political ideologies are air-bagging a ride on the highway of automotive safety, popping up unexpectedly like a lively caucus meeting. The robustness of this relationship defies statistical odds more than a third-party candidate winning the presidential race.

This study adds a whimsical twist to the age-old debate about the influence of politics on everyday life, injecting a breath of fresh air into the highly charged atmosphere of political analysis. It's as if statistics are whispering, "Don't underestimate the power of the ballot box to influence automotive safety features, and don't discount the ability of data to surprise and amuse."

In conclusion, the findings of this research elevate the importance of considering political preferences as a potential predictor for automotive safety concerns. However, we caution against overinterpreting the results, as causation cannot be established from this correlation alone. As for future research in this area, it seems that the air has been adequately bagged, and no further investigation is needed. This study may be a statistical oddity, but it's one that leaves a lasting impression on the field of interdisciplinary research.

In the words of statistical humor, "When it comes to the relationship between political votes and automotive recalls, buckle up and enjoy the bumpy, yet entertaining, ride!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Air Bags and Ballots: Exploring the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Rhode Island and Automotive Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Political and Vehicular Dynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Air Bags and Ballots: Exploring the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Rhode Island and Automotive Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Liberty and Safety Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Air Bags and Ballots: Exploring the Relationship Between Libertarian Votes in Rhode Island and Automotive Recalls with an abstract of This study delves into the intriguing and unexpected relationship between the number of votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Rhode Island and the occurrences of automotive recalls specifically related to issues with air bags. Using data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9556889 (p < 0.01) was identified for the time period spanning from 1990 to 2020. Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also inflate the importance of considering political preferences as an unexpected indicator for automotive safety concerns. This paper presents the first empirical evidence of an amusing and seemingly implausible connection between political leanings and vehicular safety features. We invite readers to buckle up as we unravel the unexpected interplay between ballot choices and automotive recalls.

ChatGPT:

Libertarian candidate, Rhode Island voting, automotive recalls, air bag issues, statistical correlation, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, US Department of Transportation, political preferences, automotive safety concerns, political leanings, vehicular safety features, ballot choices

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Rhode Island
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Rhode Island
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Rhode Island

Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags

Correlation r = 0.9556889 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9133413 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 91.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Rhode Island) over the 8 years from 1990 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00021. 0.0002103448532256770500000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 0.021% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 4,754 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.77, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19921996200020042008201220162020
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Rhode Island (Percentage of votes)0.1259470.2841790.1813680.2074880.2929420.9837483.177030.977388
Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags (Recalls)481514132310658




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.125947,0.284179,0.181368,0.207488,0.292942,0.983748,3.17703,0.977388,])
array_2 = np.array([4,8,15,14,13,23,106,58,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Rhode Island"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 5638 · Black Variable ID: 26162 · Red Variable ID: 1105
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0