about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,617 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Democratic Senators in New Hampshire and the second variable is Jet fuel used in Mongolia.  The chart goes from 1998 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

When New Hampshire Democrats vote for Senators, they unknowingly trigger a series of events. The excitement and energy from the election somehow create a ripple effect that ultimately leads to a surge in demand for jet fuel in Mongolia. It's as if their political fervor gets mixed up in the global air currents, creating a turbo boost for the aviation industry in a landlocked country. Who would have thought that the fate of Mongolian jet fuel could be tied to the ballot choices of voters in New Hampshire? It's a strange and surprising connection, but it just goes to show that in the wacky world of politics and energy, anything can happen!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a cute 2D animation depicting a bustling scene in New Hampshire, where adorable anthropomorphic voter characters eagerly wait in line to cast their ballots for the Democratic Senatorial race. Meanwhile, in Mongolia, endearing jet engine characters are shown revving up and soaring into the sky, symbolizing the surge in demand for jet fuel propelling the aviation industry forward. The connection between the two seemingly unrelated events is represented by a whimsical, invisible thread weaving through both scenes, demonstrating the unexpected link between political fervor and the demand for jet fuel in a landlocked country. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for Democratic Senators in New Hampshire and Jet fuel used in Mongolia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Woodblock painting Cubism Surrealism Cute 2D animation Cybernetic art
ChatGPT: Cute 2D animation

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for Democratic Senators in New Hampshire and Jet fuel used in Mongolia, in the following situation: When New Hampshire Democrats vote for Senators, they unknowingly trigger a series of events. The excitement and energy from the election somehow create a ripple effect that ultimately leads to a surge in demand for jet fuel in Mongolia. It's as if their political fervor gets mixed up in the global air currents, creating a turbo boost for the aviation industry in a landlocked country. Who would have thought that the fate of Mongolian jet fuel could be tied to the ballot choices of voters in New Hampshire? It's a strange and surprising connection, but it just goes to show that in the wacky world of politics and energy, anything can happen!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In New Hampshire, voters proudly stand in line, casting their ballots for Democrats in the Senatorial race. Meanwhile, in Mongolia, the roar of jet engines fills the air as a surge in demand for jet fuel propels the aviation industry forward. These two seemingly unrelated events are connected by an invisible thread, demonstrating the unexpected link between political fervor and the demand for jet fuel in a landlocked country.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cute 2D animation ] and depicting this scene: In New Hampshire, voters proudly stand in line, casting their ballots for Democrats in the Senatorial race. Meanwhile, in Mongolia, the roar of jet engines fills the air as a surge in demand for jet fuel propels the aviation industry forward. These two seemingly unrelated events are connected by an invisible thread, demonstrating the unexpected link between political fervor and the demand for jet fuel in a landlocked country. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a cute 2D animation depicting a bustling scene in New Hampshire, where adorable anthropomorphic voter characters eagerly wait in line to cast their ballots for the Democratic Senatorial race. Meanwhile, in Mongolia, endearing jet engine characters are shown revving up and soaring into the sky, symbolizing the surge in demand for jet fuel propelling the aviation industry forward. The connection between the two seemingly unrelated events is represented by a whimsical, invisible thread weaving through both scenes, demonstrating the unexpected link between political fervor and the demand for jet fuel in a landlocked country.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire caused Jet fuel used in Mongolia to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Fueling the Vote: Investigating the Surprising Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Jet Fuel Consumption in Mongolia

The Journal of Eclectic Geopolitical Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Jet fuel used in Mongolia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9441816 and p < 0.01 for 1998 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Vote: Investigating the Surprising Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Jet Fuel Consumption in Mongolia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing nexus between political preferences and energy consumption to unravel the unexpected ties between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel usage in Mongolia. Leveraging renowned data repositories such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research seeks to shed light on this peculiar correlation.

Employing advanced statistical analyses, we have uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9441816, with a p-value of less than 0.01, across the time span from 1998 to 2020. Our findings pave the way for a deeper examination of the interplay between transcontinental energy patterns and regional political dynamics, offering a fresh perspective on the intricate web of global interconnectedness.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Jet fuel used in Mongolia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Vote: Investigating the Surprising Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Jet Fuel Consumption in Mongolia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing nexus between political preferences and energy consumption to unravel the unexpected ties between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel usage in Mongolia. Leveraging renowned data repositories such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research seeks to shed light on this peculiar correlation.

Employing advanced statistical analyses, we have uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9441816, with a p-value of less than 0.01, across the time span from 1998 to 2020. Our findings pave the way for a deeper examination of the interplay between transcontinental energy patterns and regional political dynamics, offering a fresh perspective on the intricate web of global interconnectedness.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The interplay between political behavior and energy consumption has long been an area of interest for researchers seeking to understand the complex and sometimes unexpected connections that exist in our globalized world. In this study, we explore the intriguing relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel usage in Mongolia. While these two seemingly disparate phenomena may appear unrelated at first glance, our analysis reveals a surprising correlation that demands further investigation.

On the surface, one might question the logical link between the voting patterns in a state renowned for its picturesque fall foliage and the jet fuel consumption in a landlocked Asian country famous for its nomadic culture. However, as with all statistical inquiries, the allure of uncovering hidden patterns and connections motivates us to delve deeper into the data, armed with a healthy dose of curiosity and skepticism.

Our study’s foundation rests upon the utilization of robust and reputable sources of information, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab and the Energy Information Administration. Through meticulously collected and rigorously analyzed data sets, we aim to untangle the enigma of this unexpected correlation, using advanced statistical methods to tease out meaningful insights from the numbers.

Outlining the scope of our investigation, we aim to track the patterns and dynamics from 1998 to 2020, a period that encompasses a diverse array of political and environmental shifts. This broad time span allows us to capture the nuances and fluctuations that may contribute to the observed relationship, providing a comprehensive view of the interplay between regional political choices and international energy dynamics.

As we embark on this academic adventure, we remain mindful of the potential implications of our findings. Beyond the intellectual satisfaction of unraveling a statistical mystery, our research offers the tantalizing prospect of shedding light on the intricate web of global interconnectedness, where unforeseen ties between seemingly unrelated variables may hold profound implications for our understanding of society and the world at large.

So, join us as we embark on a journey of statistical discovery, where the unexpected becomes the norm, and where the improbable might just hold the key to unlocking new perspectives on the intricate tapestry of human behavior and global affairs.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Jet fuel used in Mongolia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Vote: Investigating the Surprising Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Jet Fuel Consumption in Mongolia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing nexus between political preferences and energy consumption to unravel the unexpected ties between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel usage in Mongolia. Leveraging renowned data repositories such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research seeks to shed light on this peculiar correlation.

Employing advanced statistical analyses, we have uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9441816, with a p-value of less than 0.01, across the time span from 1998 to 2020. Our findings pave the way for a deeper examination of the interplay between transcontinental energy patterns and regional political dynamics, offering a fresh perspective on the intricate web of global interconnectedness.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between political behavior and energy consumption has long been an area of interest for researchers seeking to understand the complex and sometimes unexpected connections that exist in our globalized world. In this study, we explore the intriguing relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel usage in Mongolia. While these two seemingly disparate phenomena may appear unrelated at first glance, our analysis reveals a surprising correlation that demands further investigation.
On the surface, one might question the logical link between the voting patterns in a state renowned for its picturesque fall foliage and the jet fuel consumption in a landlocked Asian country famous for its nomadic culture. However, as with all statistical inquiries, the allure of uncovering hidden patterns and connections motivates us to delve deeper into the data, armed with a healthy dose of curiosity and skepticism.
Our study’s foundation rests upon the utilization of robust and reputable sources of information, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab and the Energy Information Administration. Through meticulously collected and rigorously analyzed data sets, we aim to untangle the enigma of this unexpected correlation, using advanced statistical methods to tease out meaningful insights from the numbers.
Outlining the scope of our investigation, we aim to track the patterns and dynamics from 1998 to 2020, a period that encompasses a diverse array of political and environmental shifts. This broad time span allows us to capture the nuances and fluctuations that may contribute to the observed relationship, providing a comprehensive view of the interplay between regional political choices and international energy dynamics.
As we embark on this academic adventure, we remain mindful of the potential implications of our findings. Beyond the intellectual satisfaction of unraveling a statistical mystery, our research offers the tantalizing prospect of shedding light on the intricate web of global interconnectedness, where unforeseen ties between seemingly unrelated variables may hold profound implications for our understanding of society and the world at large.
So, join us as we embark on a journey of statistical discovery, where the unexpected becomes the norm, and where the improbable might just hold the key to unlocking new perspectives on the intricate tapestry of human behavior and global affairs.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literature examining the intersection of political preferences and energy consumption provides a robust foundation for our investigation into the peculiar connection between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel usage in Mongolia. Smith et al. (2016) conducted a comprehensive analysis of regional voting patterns and their relationship to environmental variables, laying the groundwork for our exploration of seemingly incongruous correlations. Likewise, Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the global energy landscape, offering valuable insights into the complexities of fuel consumption and its potential reverberations in unexpected corners of the world.

Moving beyond strictly academic arenas, works such as "Energy and Democracy" by Green and Power (2014) and "The Politics of Fuel" by Red and Blue (2017) offer intriguing perspectives on the intricate dance between political decision-making and energy dynamics. These texts lay bare the complexities and interdependencies that underpin seemingly disparate phenomena, setting the stage for our ventures into uncharted statistical territory.

Transitioning from scholarly to fictional realms, the works of J.R.R. Tolkien, particularly "The Lord of the Rings," and George R.R. Martin's "A Song of Ice and Fire" series, spark fascinating parallels. While these narrative epics may seem far removed from our empirical inquiry, the subtle connections between the political machinations of Westeros and the energy-intensive journeys to Mount Doom offer unexpected avenues for contemplation.

Moreover, the viral internet sensation known as "Jet Fuel Can't Melt Steel Beams" serves as a curious parallel to our topic of inquiry. While originating from a different discourse, the meme's emphasis on questioning established narratives and uncovering hidden connections aligns with our own quest to unravel the enigmatic ties between seemingly unrelated variables.

In synthesizing these diverse strands of literature, we embark on a journey that combines rigorous statistical analysis with a dash of speculative intrigue, as we probe the curious correlation between political support in New Hampshire and jet fuel consumption in Mongolia.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Jet fuel used in Mongolia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1998 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Vote: Investigating the Surprising Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Jet Fuel Consumption in Mongolia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing nexus between political preferences and energy consumption to unravel the unexpected ties between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel usage in Mongolia. Leveraging renowned data repositories such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research seeks to shed light on this peculiar correlation.

Employing advanced statistical analyses, we have uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9441816, with a p-value of less than 0.01, across the time span from 1998 to 2020. Our findings pave the way for a deeper examination of the interplay between transcontinental energy patterns and regional political dynamics, offering a fresh perspective on the intricate web of global interconnectedness.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between political behavior and energy consumption has long been an area of interest for researchers seeking to understand the complex and sometimes unexpected connections that exist in our globalized world. In this study, we explore the intriguing relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel usage in Mongolia. While these two seemingly disparate phenomena may appear unrelated at first glance, our analysis reveals a surprising correlation that demands further investigation.
On the surface, one might question the logical link between the voting patterns in a state renowned for its picturesque fall foliage and the jet fuel consumption in a landlocked Asian country famous for its nomadic culture. However, as with all statistical inquiries, the allure of uncovering hidden patterns and connections motivates us to delve deeper into the data, armed with a healthy dose of curiosity and skepticism.
Our study’s foundation rests upon the utilization of robust and reputable sources of information, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab and the Energy Information Administration. Through meticulously collected and rigorously analyzed data sets, we aim to untangle the enigma of this unexpected correlation, using advanced statistical methods to tease out meaningful insights from the numbers.
Outlining the scope of our investigation, we aim to track the patterns and dynamics from 1998 to 2020, a period that encompasses a diverse array of political and environmental shifts. This broad time span allows us to capture the nuances and fluctuations that may contribute to the observed relationship, providing a comprehensive view of the interplay between regional political choices and international energy dynamics.
As we embark on this academic adventure, we remain mindful of the potential implications of our findings. Beyond the intellectual satisfaction of unraveling a statistical mystery, our research offers the tantalizing prospect of shedding light on the intricate web of global interconnectedness, where unforeseen ties between seemingly unrelated variables may hold profound implications for our understanding of society and the world at large.
So, join us as we embark on a journey of statistical discovery, where the unexpected becomes the norm, and where the improbable might just hold the key to unlocking new perspectives on the intricate tapestry of human behavior and global affairs.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the underlying connection between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel consumption in Mongolia, we employed an array of meticulous methodologies that allowed for a robust and comprehensive analysis. Our data collection process involved a wide net cast across the vast expanse of the internet, with a particular focus on esteemed repositories such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration. We diligently sifted through the digital haystack to procure the most salient and reliable datasets spanning the 22-year period from 1998 to 2020.

The initial step in our methodological odyssey involved the extraction and amalgamation of electoral data pertaining to the voting trends associated with Democrat candidates for the United States Senate representing the state of New Hampshire. These data were sourced from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, a repository renowned for its veracity and scope in capturing the intricate dynamics of electoral behavior. Simultaneously, we harnessed the prodigious resources of the Harvard Dataverse to obtain granular insights into the jet fuel consumption patterns within the landlocked expanse of Mongolia.

With these datasets in hand, we proceeded to meticulously sanitize, harmonize, and align the information to ensure a seamless integration, cognizant of the potential pitfalls that can ensnare unwary researchers in the thorny thickets of disparate data sources. Our team, armed with a fount of caffeinated beverages and an abundance of determination, meticulously cross-referenced and calibrated the datasets, crafting a unified corpus of information capable of withstanding the exacting scrutiny of advanced statistical methodologies.

Having fortified our dataset, we embarked on the arduous task of statistical analysis, deploying an ensemble of sophisticated techniques to unravel the enigma enshrouding the perceived correlation between the disparate variables of Democrat senatorial votes in New Hampshire and jet fuel usage in Mongolia. The bedrock of our analysis lay in the calculation of correlation coefficients, a venerable statistical tool that gauges the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables. Through our assiduous calculations, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9441816, imbuing our findings with a robust statistical significance, as evidenced by a p-value of less than 0.01.

Furthermore, our statistical alchemy drew upon the venerable art of time series analysis, a methodological mainstay for unraveling the temporal ebbs and flows that underpin the tides of complex phenomena. This allowed us to trace the nuanced fluctuations in both political preferences and energy consumption across the expanse of time, offering a panoramic view of the interplay between regional electoral dynamics and international energy patterns.

In sum, our methodological repertoire was marked by a meticulous and thorough approach, blending the art of data collection, harmonization, and statistical analysis to unearth the unexpected nexus between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel consumption in Mongolia. This methodological saga stands as a testament to the enduring spirit of academic inquiry, where the pursuit of knowledge is infused with equal parts rigor and a sense of adventure.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Jet fuel used in Mongolia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1998 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9441816, r-squared of 0.8914789, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Vote: Investigating the Surprising Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Jet Fuel Consumption in Mongolia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing nexus between political preferences and energy consumption to unravel the unexpected ties between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel usage in Mongolia. Leveraging renowned data repositories such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research seeks to shed light on this peculiar correlation.

Employing advanced statistical analyses, we have uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9441816, with a p-value of less than 0.01, across the time span from 1998 to 2020. Our findings pave the way for a deeper examination of the interplay between transcontinental energy patterns and regional political dynamics, offering a fresh perspective on the intricate web of global interconnectedness.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The interplay between political behavior and energy consumption has long been an area of interest for researchers seeking to understand the complex and sometimes unexpected connections that exist in our globalized world. In this study, we explore the intriguing relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel usage in Mongolia. While these two seemingly disparate phenomena may appear unrelated at first glance, our analysis reveals a surprising correlation that demands further investigation.
On the surface, one might question the logical link between the voting patterns in a state renowned for its picturesque fall foliage and the jet fuel consumption in a landlocked Asian country famous for its nomadic culture. However, as with all statistical inquiries, the allure of uncovering hidden patterns and connections motivates us to delve deeper into the data, armed with a healthy dose of curiosity and skepticism.
Our study’s foundation rests upon the utilization of robust and reputable sources of information, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab and the Energy Information Administration. Through meticulously collected and rigorously analyzed data sets, we aim to untangle the enigma of this unexpected correlation, using advanced statistical methods to tease out meaningful insights from the numbers.
Outlining the scope of our investigation, we aim to track the patterns and dynamics from 1998 to 2020, a period that encompasses a diverse array of political and environmental shifts. This broad time span allows us to capture the nuances and fluctuations that may contribute to the observed relationship, providing a comprehensive view of the interplay between regional political choices and international energy dynamics.
As we embark on this academic adventure, we remain mindful of the potential implications of our findings. Beyond the intellectual satisfaction of unraveling a statistical mystery, our research offers the tantalizing prospect of shedding light on the intricate web of global interconnectedness, where unforeseen ties between seemingly unrelated variables may hold profound implications for our understanding of society and the world at large.
So, join us as we embark on a journey of statistical discovery, where the unexpected becomes the norm, and where the improbable might just hold the key to unlocking new perspectives on the intricate tapestry of human behavior and global affairs.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis reveals a remarkably strong correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel consumption in Mongolia, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9441816. This substantial coefficient suggests a robust relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. The high R-squared value of 0.8914789 further underscores the predictive power of the relationship, indicating that over 89% of the variability in Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire can be explained by jet fuel usage in Mongolia. With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently reject the null hypothesis of no correlation and assert the existence of a significant association.

The strong statistical connection between these disparate elements prompts us to consider potential underlying mechanisms. Are the fall colors of New Hampshire secretly influencing energy decisions in a nomadic Mongolian context? Or perhaps there's a clandestine migration of Mongolian yaks secretly swaying political sentiments in the Granite State? Alas, these whimsical suppositions call for further investigation and tongue-in-cheek reflections.

To visually represent this unexpected relationship, we have included a scatterplot (Fig. 1) that vividly depicts the tight alignment between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel consumption in Mongolia. The scatterplot serves as a compelling visual testimonial to the striking statistical association we have uncovered.

The magnitude of this correlation, while undeniably intriguing, prompts us to exercise caution in ascribing causality. It would be premature to assert that the voting behaviors in one region directly dictate energy choices in a distant land. Our findings present an intellectual enigma that beckons for continued exploration and scholarly discernment.

In sum, our investigation into the surprising interconnection between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel consumption in Mongolia has unearthed a statistically significant correlation. These findings challenge us to rethink the boundaries of causality and to welcome the unconventional with open statistical arms.

As we ponder the implications of these unexpected results, we remain vigilant in our quest for knowledge and understanding. The convoluted web of statistical relationships continues to unravel, inviting us to embrace the unexpected and celebrate the serendipitous discoveries that await in the unlikeliest of places.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Jet fuel used in Mongolia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Vote: Investigating the Surprising Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Jet Fuel Consumption in Mongolia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing nexus between political preferences and energy consumption to unravel the unexpected ties between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel usage in Mongolia. Leveraging renowned data repositories such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research seeks to shed light on this peculiar correlation.

Employing advanced statistical analyses, we have uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9441816, with a p-value of less than 0.01, across the time span from 1998 to 2020. Our findings pave the way for a deeper examination of the interplay between transcontinental energy patterns and regional political dynamics, offering a fresh perspective on the intricate web of global interconnectedness.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature examining the intersection of political preferences and energy consumption provides a robust foundation for our investigation into the peculiar connection between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel usage in Mongolia. Smith et al. (2016) conducted a comprehensive analysis of regional voting patterns and their relationship to environmental variables, laying the groundwork for our exploration of seemingly incongruous correlations. Likewise, Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the global energy landscape, offering valuable insights into the complexities of fuel consumption and its potential reverberations in unexpected corners of the world.
Moving beyond strictly academic arenas, works such as "Energy and Democracy" by Green and Power (2014) and "The Politics of Fuel" by Red and Blue (2017) offer intriguing perspectives on the intricate dance between political decision-making and energy dynamics. These texts lay bare the complexities and interdependencies that underpin seemingly disparate phenomena, setting the stage for our ventures into uncharted statistical territory.
Transitioning from scholarly to fictional realms, the works of J.R.R. Tolkien, particularly "The Lord of the Rings," and George R.R. Martin's "A Song of Ice and Fire" series, spark fascinating parallels. While these narrative epics may seem far removed from our empirical inquiry, the subtle connections between the political machinations of Westeros and the energy-intensive journeys to Mount Doom offer unexpected avenues for contemplation.
Moreover, the viral internet sensation known as "Jet Fuel Can't Melt Steel Beams" serves as a curious parallel to our topic of inquiry. While originating from a different discourse, the meme's emphasis on questioning established narratives and uncovering hidden connections aligns with our own quest to unravel the enigmatic ties between seemingly unrelated variables.
In synthesizing these diverse strands of literature, we embark on a journey that combines rigorous statistical analysis with a dash of speculative intrigue, as we probe the curious correlation between political support in New Hampshire and jet fuel consumption in Mongolia.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis reveals a remarkably strong correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel consumption in Mongolia, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9441816. This substantial coefficient suggests a robust relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. The high R-squared value of 0.8914789 further underscores the predictive power of the relationship, indicating that over 89% of the variability in Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire can be explained by jet fuel usage in Mongolia. With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently reject the null hypothesis of no correlation and assert the existence of a significant association.
The strong statistical connection between these disparate elements prompts us to consider potential underlying mechanisms. Are the fall colors of New Hampshire secretly influencing energy decisions in a nomadic Mongolian context? Or perhaps there's a clandestine migration of Mongolian yaks secretly swaying political sentiments in the Granite State? Alas, these whimsical suppositions call for further investigation and tongue-in-cheek reflections.
To visually represent this unexpected relationship, we have included a scatterplot (Fig. 1) that vividly depicts the tight alignment between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel consumption in Mongolia. The scatterplot serves as a compelling visual testimonial to the striking statistical association we have uncovered.
The magnitude of this correlation, while undeniably intriguing, prompts us to exercise caution in ascribing causality. It would be premature to assert that the voting behaviors in one region directly dictate energy choices in a distant land. Our findings present an intellectual enigma that beckons for continued exploration and scholarly discernment.
In sum, our investigation into the surprising interconnection between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel consumption in Mongolia has unearthed a statistically significant correlation. These findings challenge us to rethink the boundaries of causality and to welcome the unconventional with open statistical arms.
As we ponder the implications of these unexpected results, we remain vigilant in our quest for knowledge and understanding. The convoluted web of statistical relationships continues to unravel, inviting us to embrace the unexpected and celebrate the serendipitous discoveries that await in the unlikeliest of places.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The culmination of our study sheds light on the intricate connection between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel consumption in Mongolia. Our findings not only validate the existing body of literature on seemingly disparate correlations but also open new avenues for speculation and inquiry.

In line with the scholarly works of Smith et al. (2016) and Doe and Jones (2018), our research reaffirms the transformative potential of exploring unexpected intersections. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9441816, reinforced by a significant p-value, mirrors the implications put forth by these prior studies. Indeed, as illustrated by our results, statistical analyses provide a powerful lens for uncovering latent relationships and unearthing unsuspected ties.

Moreover, our findings resonate with the speculative parallels drawn from J.R.R. Tolkien and George R.R. Martin's literary sagas. The convoluted political maneuvers of Westeros and the energy-intensive quests in Middle-earth now find a peculiar echo in our empirical discovery. It seems that the threads of unexpected correlations can weave a tale as compelling as any fantastical narrative.

Amidst these revelations, we cannot overlook the lighthearted allegory of "Jet Fuel Can't Melt Steel Beams." While rooted in a different context, this meme’s spirit of teasing out improbable connections serves as an intriguing mirror to our own exploration. Though unassuming at first glance, these seemingly farcical references speak to the serendipitous nature of our statistical odyssey.

Our results put forth a mosaic of statistical interdependence, challenging the notion of causality and beckoning us to embrace the whimsical twists that statistical inquiry can unveil. In doing so, we underscore the spirited tenacity of scholarly pursuit, reminding ourselves that statistical truths can often reside in the unlikeliest of places.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Jet fuel used in Mongolia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Vote: Investigating the Surprising Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Jet Fuel Consumption in Mongolia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing nexus between political preferences and energy consumption to unravel the unexpected ties between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel usage in Mongolia. Leveraging renowned data repositories such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research seeks to shed light on this peculiar correlation.

Employing advanced statistical analyses, we have uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9441816, with a p-value of less than 0.01, across the time span from 1998 to 2020. Our findings pave the way for a deeper examination of the interplay between transcontinental energy patterns and regional political dynamics, offering a fresh perspective on the intricate web of global interconnectedness.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The interplay between political behavior and energy consumption has long been an area of interest for researchers seeking to understand the complex and sometimes unexpected connections that exist in our globalized world. In this study, we explore the intriguing relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel usage in Mongolia. While these two seemingly disparate phenomena may appear unrelated at first glance, our analysis reveals a surprising correlation that demands further investigation.
On the surface, one might question the logical link between the voting patterns in a state renowned for its picturesque fall foliage and the jet fuel consumption in a landlocked Asian country famous for its nomadic culture. However, as with all statistical inquiries, the allure of uncovering hidden patterns and connections motivates us to delve deeper into the data, armed with a healthy dose of curiosity and skepticism.
Our study’s foundation rests upon the utilization of robust and reputable sources of information, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab and the Energy Information Administration. Through meticulously collected and rigorously analyzed data sets, we aim to untangle the enigma of this unexpected correlation, using advanced statistical methods to tease out meaningful insights from the numbers.
Outlining the scope of our investigation, we aim to track the patterns and dynamics from 1998 to 2020, a period that encompasses a diverse array of political and environmental shifts. This broad time span allows us to capture the nuances and fluctuations that may contribute to the observed relationship, providing a comprehensive view of the interplay between regional political choices and international energy dynamics.
As we embark on this academic adventure, we remain mindful of the potential implications of our findings. Beyond the intellectual satisfaction of unraveling a statistical mystery, our research offers the tantalizing prospect of shedding light on the intricate web of global interconnectedness, where unforeseen ties between seemingly unrelated variables may hold profound implications for our understanding of society and the world at large.
So, join us as we embark on a journey of statistical discovery, where the unexpected becomes the norm, and where the improbable might just hold the key to unlocking new perspectives on the intricate tapestry of human behavior and global affairs.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis reveals a remarkably strong correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel consumption in Mongolia, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9441816. This substantial coefficient suggests a robust relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. The high R-squared value of 0.8914789 further underscores the predictive power of the relationship, indicating that over 89% of the variability in Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire can be explained by jet fuel usage in Mongolia. With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently reject the null hypothesis of no correlation and assert the existence of a significant association.
The strong statistical connection between these disparate elements prompts us to consider potential underlying mechanisms. Are the fall colors of New Hampshire secretly influencing energy decisions in a nomadic Mongolian context? Or perhaps there's a clandestine migration of Mongolian yaks secretly swaying political sentiments in the Granite State? Alas, these whimsical suppositions call for further investigation and tongue-in-cheek reflections.
To visually represent this unexpected relationship, we have included a scatterplot (Fig. 1) that vividly depicts the tight alignment between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel consumption in Mongolia. The scatterplot serves as a compelling visual testimonial to the striking statistical association we have uncovered.
The magnitude of this correlation, while undeniably intriguing, prompts us to exercise caution in ascribing causality. It would be premature to assert that the voting behaviors in one region directly dictate energy choices in a distant land. Our findings present an intellectual enigma that beckons for continued exploration and scholarly discernment.
In sum, our investigation into the surprising interconnection between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel consumption in Mongolia has unearthed a statistically significant correlation. These findings challenge us to rethink the boundaries of causality and to welcome the unconventional with open statistical arms.
As we ponder the implications of these unexpected results, we remain vigilant in our quest for knowledge and understanding. The convoluted web of statistical relationships continues to unravel, inviting us to embrace the unexpected and celebrate the serendipitous discoveries that await in the unlikeliest of places.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the findings of this study present a compelling case for the unexpected relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel usage in Mongolia. The remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9441816 defies conventional expectations and beckons us to contemplate the intricate interplay between seemingly disparate variables. While we have harnessed the power of advanced statistical techniques to unravel this enigma, we must exercise caution in leaping to causal assertions, as correlation does not necessarily imply causation - unless, of course, Mongolian yaks have secretly become political influencers in the New Hampshire wilderness!

Our journey through the statistical landscape has revealed not just an academic curiosity but a testament to the boundless surprises that await in the world of data analysis. As we gaze upon the scatterplot (Fig. 1) with its tightly clustered data points, we are reminded of the whimsical unpredictability of statistical relationships, where hidden connections sprout like wildflowers in an otherwise barren field.

Yet, as we revel in the delight of this unforeseen correlation, we must recognize the limits of our current understanding. While our study sheds light on this peculiar association, it paves the way for future inquiries to probe deeper into the underlying mechanisms and potential causal pathways. Perhaps a more nuanced analysis of seasonal variations in New Hampshire's foliage colors and their impact on international energy negotiations will offer a colorful twist to our findings.

In closing, the tantalizing dance between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel consumption in Mongolia highlights the importance of embracing the unexpected in statistical inquiry. As we bid adieu to this peculiar pairing, we assert with confidence that no further research in this area is required, unless, of course, a yak-led political revolution sweeps through the forests of New Hampshire. Cheers to statistical serendipity!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fueling the Vote: Investigating the Surprising Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Jet Fuel Consumption in Mongolia. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Eclectic Geopolitical Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fueling the Vote: Investigating the Surprising Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Jet Fuel Consumption in Mongolia. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Transcontinental Electoral Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fueling the Vote: Investigating the Surprising Relationship Between Democrat Votes for Senators in New Hampshire and Jet Fuel Consumption in Mongolia with an abstract of This study delves into the intriguing nexus between political preferences and energy consumption to unravel the unexpected ties between Democrat votes for Senators in New Hampshire and jet fuel usage in Mongolia. Leveraging renowned data repositories such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, our research seeks to shed light on this peculiar correlation.
Employing advanced statistical analyses, we have uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9441816, with a p-value of less than 0.01, across the time span from 1998 to 2020. Our findings pave the way for a deeper examination of the interplay between transcontinental energy patterns and regional political dynamics, offering a fresh perspective on the intricate web of global interconnectedness.

ChatGPT:

"Democrat votes New Hampshire," "jet fuel consumption Mongolia," "political preferences energy consumption," "MIT Election Data Science Lab," "Harvard Dataverse," "Energy Information Administration," "correlation between political preferences and energy consumption," "statistical analysis correlation coefficient," "transcontinental energy patterns," "regional political dynamics," "global interconnectedness"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Democratic Senators in New Hampshire
Detailed data title: Total number of votes cast for Federal Democrat Senate candidates in New Hampshire
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Democratic Senators in New Hampshire

Jet fuel used in Mongolia
Detailed data title: Volume of jet fuel used consumed in Mongolia in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Jet fuel used in Mongolia

Correlation r = 0.9441816 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8914789 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 89.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Jet fuel used in Mongolia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Democratic Senators in New Hampshire) over the 8 years from 1998 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00042. 0.0004167845205078489000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 0.042% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,399 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.72, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19982002200420082010201420162020
Votes for Democratic Senators in New Hampshire (Total votes)88883207478221549358438167545251184354649450778
Jet fuel used in Mongolia (Million Barrels/Day)0.021720.4562470.4983330.6933330.3476160.56487710.94715




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([88883,207478,221549,358438,167545,251184,354649,450778,])
array_2 = np.array([0.02172,0.456247,0.498333,0.693333,0.347616,0.564877,1,0.94715,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Democratic Senators in New Hampshire"
array_2_name = "Jet fuel used in Mongolia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 5617 · Black Variable ID: 26278 · Red Variable ID: 24703
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0