about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,546 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How geeky Technology Connections YouTube video titles are and the second variable is Google searches for 'how to fake your own death'.  The chart goes from 2015 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As interest in faking your own death wanes, people are no longer as concerned with the intricate technological details needed to pull off an elaborate disappearance. It's a classic case of the fake-it-till-you-make-it mentality inadvertently leading to a decline in tech geekiness. So, remember, the next time you're considering a career change to become a professional hermit, think about the unintended consequences on the tech world!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that conveys a sense of humor and absurdity inspired by the scenario: - Scene: In a vibrant city, a group of friends sits at a café, surrounded by the bustling urban landscape. They are engrossed in their smartphones, with each person comically looking up "how to fake your own death" on Google. The friends exhibit puzzled expressions and glance at each other with a mix of concern and mischief. - Context: Nearby, a large billboard displays the latest YouTube video titles from Technology Connections, featuring sleek graphics and advanced technical terms. The juxtaposition of the friends' peculiar search and the high-tech content on the billboard creates a humorous and surreal atmosphere. By incorporating elements of modern technology, urban life, and playful absurdity, DALL·E-3 will produce an image that reflects the interplay of contemporary culture and absurd humor. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How geeky Technology Connections YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'how to fake your own death'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a funny image macro An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Steampunk Hyper-realistic A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s
ChatGPT: a funny image macro

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How geeky Technology Connections YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'how to fake your own death', in the following situation: As interest in faking your own death wanes, people are no longer as concerned with the intricate technological details needed to pull off an elaborate disappearance. It's a classic case of the fake-it-till-you-make-it mentality inadvertently leading to a decline in tech geekiness. So, remember, the next time you're considering a career change to become a professional hermit, think about the unintended consequences on the tech world!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the midst of a bustling city, a group of friends sits at a cafe, their smartphones in hand, looking up "how to fake your own death" on Google. Meanwhile, a billboard nearby displays the latest Technology Connections YouTube video titles, featuring sleek graphics and complex technical terms. However, the once crowded webpages about elaborate disappearing acts now appear quieter, reflecting the declining interest in geeky technology details.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image macro ] and depicting this scene: In the midst of a bustling city, a group of friends sits at a cafe, their smartphones in hand, looking up "how to fake your own death" on Google. Meanwhile, a billboard nearby displays the latest Technology Connections YouTube video titles, featuring sleek graphics and complex technical terms. However, the once crowded webpages about elaborate disappearing acts now appear quieter, reflecting the declining interest in geeky technology details. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that conveys a sense of humor and absurdity inspired by the scenario: - Scene: In a vibrant city, a group of friends sits at a café, surrounded by the bustling urban landscape. They are engrossed in their smartphones, with each person comically looking up "how to fake your own death" on Google. The friends exhibit puzzled expressions and glance at each other with a mix of concern and mischief. - Context: Nearby, a large billboard displays the latest YouTube video titles from Technology Connections, featuring sleek graphics and advanced technical terms. The juxtaposition of the friends' peculiar search and the high-tech content on the billboard creates a humorous and surreal atmosphere. By incorporating elements of modern technology, urban life, and playful absurdity, DALL·E-3 will produce an image that reflects the interplay of contemporary culture and absurd humor.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in How geeky Technology Connections YouTube video titles are caused how to fake your own death (Google searches for 'how to fake your own death') to decrease.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Techy Tactics: Tracing the Tendency Toward 'How to Fake Your Own Death' Searches with Geeky Technology Connections

The Journal of Digital Deception Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky Technology Connections YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'how to fake your own death'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8420705 and p < 0.01 for 2015 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Techy Tactics: Tracing the Tendency Toward 'How to Fake Your Own Death' Searches with Geeky Technology Connections

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this tech-savvy study, we delve into the perplexing connection between the geeky video titles of Technology Connections on YouTube and online searches for 'how to fake your own death'. Utilizing an AI-assisted analysis of the video titles and Google Trends data, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8420705 with p < 0.01 for the duration of 2015 to 2023. Our findings not only shed light on the quirky influence of geeky tech content on peculiar search queries but also highlight the diverse and unconventional pathways through which technology impacts our online behaviors. This investigation offers a lighthearted yet intriguing perspective on the interplay between technology fascination and morbid curiosity, paving the way for further whimsical research in the realm of digital influence.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky Technology Connections YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'how to fake your own death'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Techy Tactics: Tracing the Tendency Toward 'How to Fake Your Own Death' Searches with Geeky Technology Connections

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this tech-savvy study, we delve into the perplexing connection between the geeky video titles of Technology Connections on YouTube and online searches for 'how to fake your own death'. Utilizing an AI-assisted analysis of the video titles and Google Trends data, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8420705 with p < 0.01 for the duration of 2015 to 2023. Our findings not only shed light on the quirky influence of geeky tech content on peculiar search queries but also highlight the diverse and unconventional pathways through which technology impacts our online behaviors. This investigation offers a lighthearted yet intriguing perspective on the interplay between technology fascination and morbid curiosity, paving the way for further whimsical research in the realm of digital influence.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Welcome, fellow academics and enthusiasts of the peculiar and the preposterous, to our technologically twisted tale. In this delightfully geeky escapade, we embark on a riveting exploration of the interwoven realms of technology fascination and the inexplicably macabre penchant for 'how to fake your own death' searches. Strap on your seatbelts and charge up your neural networks, as we delve into the curious correlation between the geeky video titles of Technology Connections on YouTube and the obscure quest for faking one's demise.

Now, picture this: a world where the bizarre and the tech-savvy collide, where transistor trivia meets morbid musings, and where the search for technological enlightenment takes a detour into the realm of simulated expiration. Our quest begins with a light-hearted yet rigorous analysis of the YouTube video titles crafted by the ingenious mind behind Technology Connections. Armed with wit and whimsy, we set out to unravel the peculiar patterns hidden within these digital monikers.

As we venture deeper into this digital odyssey, we embrace the absurdity of our inquiry, recognizing that at the intersection of geekery and morbidity lies a trove of unexpected insights. With a twinkle in our statistical eyes, we employ the formidable might of AI-assisted analysis to decode the enigmatic relationship between these seemingly disparate domains. In doing so, we uncover a correlation coefficient that would make even the most stoic of statisticians do a double take – a dazzling 0.8420705, with p < 0.01, spanning the timeline of 2015 to 2023.

Before we proceed, it is only fitting to pause and revel in the sheer audacity of our endeavor. Who would have thought that the whimsical world of YouTube video titles could wield such influence over the virtual voyages of those seeking deceptive demises? The intersection of the geeky and the grim has never been more riveting – a testament to the unfathomable intricacies of our digital age.

With our hearts brimming with zeal and our hypotheses tinged with humor, we invite you to partake in this whimsical expedition, where the pursuit of knowledge dances hand in hand with the absurdities of human curiosity. So, join us as we uncover the secrets of techy tactics, where the allure of technology tangoes with the inexplicable allure of faking one's own demise. This investigation not only adds a playful spin to the annals of academic research but also paves the way for a lighthearted yet profound understanding of the multifaceted impact of technology on our online escapades.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky Technology Connections YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'how to fake your own death'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Techy Tactics: Tracing the Tendency Toward 'How to Fake Your Own Death' Searches with Geeky Technology Connections

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this tech-savvy study, we delve into the perplexing connection between the geeky video titles of Technology Connections on YouTube and online searches for 'how to fake your own death'. Utilizing an AI-assisted analysis of the video titles and Google Trends data, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8420705 with p < 0.01 for the duration of 2015 to 2023. Our findings not only shed light on the quirky influence of geeky tech content on peculiar search queries but also highlight the diverse and unconventional pathways through which technology impacts our online behaviors. This investigation offers a lighthearted yet intriguing perspective on the interplay between technology fascination and morbid curiosity, paving the way for further whimsical research in the realm of digital influence.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Welcome, fellow academics and enthusiasts of the peculiar and the preposterous, to our technologically twisted tale. In this delightfully geeky escapade, we embark on a riveting exploration of the interwoven realms of technology fascination and the inexplicably macabre penchant for 'how to fake your own death' searches. Strap on your seatbelts and charge up your neural networks, as we delve into the curious correlation between the geeky video titles of Technology Connections on YouTube and the obscure quest for faking one's demise.
Now, picture this: a world where the bizarre and the tech-savvy collide, where transistor trivia meets morbid musings, and where the search for technological enlightenment takes a detour into the realm of simulated expiration. Our quest begins with a light-hearted yet rigorous analysis of the YouTube video titles crafted by the ingenious mind behind Technology Connections. Armed with wit and whimsy, we set out to unravel the peculiar patterns hidden within these digital monikers.
As we venture deeper into this digital odyssey, we embrace the absurdity of our inquiry, recognizing that at the intersection of geekery and morbidity lies a trove of unexpected insights. With a twinkle in our statistical eyes, we employ the formidable might of AI-assisted analysis to decode the enigmatic relationship between these seemingly disparate domains. In doing so, we uncover a correlation coefficient that would make even the most stoic of statisticians do a double take – a dazzling 0.8420705, with p < 0.01, spanning the timeline of 2015 to 2023.
Before we proceed, it is only fitting to pause and revel in the sheer audacity of our endeavor. Who would have thought that the whimsical world of YouTube video titles could wield such influence over the virtual voyages of those seeking deceptive demises? The intersection of the geeky and the grim has never been more riveting – a testament to the unfathomable intricacies of our digital age.
With our hearts brimming with zeal and our hypotheses tinged with humor, we invite you to partake in this whimsical expedition, where the pursuit of knowledge dances hand in hand with the absurdities of human curiosity. So, join us as we uncover the secrets of techy tactics, where the allure of technology tangoes with the inexplicable allure of faking one's own demise. This investigation not only adds a playful spin to the annals of academic research but also paves the way for a lighthearted yet profound understanding of the multifaceted impact of technology on our online escapades.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The emergence of unconventional correlations within the digital domain has piqued the curiosity of researchers and enthusiasts alike. In this section, we delve into existing literature that uncovers the interplay between geeky technology content and inexplicable online search patterns, paving the way for our own whimsical exploration of the connection between the video titles of Technology Connections on YouTube and the enigmatic quest for 'how to fake your own death'.

Smith et al. (2018) delved into the realm of digital eccentricities and unearthed unexpected associations between seemingly unrelated phenomena. Their work laid the groundwork for our own investigation, challenging us to unravel the mysteries that lurk beneath the surface of seemingly trivial digital interactions. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2019) ventured into the technological frontier, shedding light on the nuances of online behavior and the myriad ways in which technology intertwines with our daily whims and fancies.

Building on the foundational works of these esteemed researchers, we venture into a spiral of whimsy and wonder, transcending the conventional confines of academic inquiry. As we navigate the juncture of geeky tech intrigue and the unconventional allure of simulated demises, we draw inspiration not only from scholarly literature but also from works that infuse quirk and levity into the exploration of human curiosities.

In "Digital Dilemmas: Navigating the Quirks and Quagmires of Online Oddities" (Steele, 2021), the author artfully charts a course through the labyrinthine landscapes of digital peculiarities, beckoning readers to ponder the unforeseen connections that bind our online pursuits. Furthermore, "Curiosities in Cyberspace: A Compendium of Unconventional Online Quests" (Blanchard, 2020) offers a whimsical foray into the realms of digital curiosities, intertwining the scholarly with the surreal to shed light on the inexplicable fascinations that permeate our online odysseys.

Straying from the traditional confines of empirical research, we draw inspiration from the unlikeliest of sources, recognizing that even fiction has its place in inspiring scholarly inquiries. The cryptic musings of "The Techno-Necromancer's Almanac" (Harper, 2017) beckon us to explore the enigmatic nexus of technology and mortal artifice, blurring the lines between the believable and the preposterous. Additionally, "Geekery and Grim Gauntlets: A Tale of Technological Intrigue" (Whittaker, 2019) presents a fantastical narrative that weaves together the surreal delights of technology and the unforeseen allure of morbid masquerades.

As our inquiry delves deeper into uncharted territories, we glean insight from the most unexpected wellsprings of wisdom. From the enigmatic prose of "The Mysteries of Metadata: A Quirky Quest for Digital Secrets" (Anonymous, 2020) to the lighthearted musings found in the backs of shampoo bottles, we embrace the whimsy that pervades our investigation, recognizing that the unconventional may hold the key to unlocking the mysteries that lie at the heart of our digital curiosities.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky Technology Connections YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'how to fake your own death'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends . You used data from 2015 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Techy Tactics: Tracing the Tendency Toward 'How to Fake Your Own Death' Searches with Geeky Technology Connections

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this tech-savvy study, we delve into the perplexing connection between the geeky video titles of Technology Connections on YouTube and online searches for 'how to fake your own death'. Utilizing an AI-assisted analysis of the video titles and Google Trends data, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8420705 with p < 0.01 for the duration of 2015 to 2023. Our findings not only shed light on the quirky influence of geeky tech content on peculiar search queries but also highlight the diverse and unconventional pathways through which technology impacts our online behaviors. This investigation offers a lighthearted yet intriguing perspective on the interplay between technology fascination and morbid curiosity, paving the way for further whimsical research in the realm of digital influence.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Welcome, fellow academics and enthusiasts of the peculiar and the preposterous, to our technologically twisted tale. In this delightfully geeky escapade, we embark on a riveting exploration of the interwoven realms of technology fascination and the inexplicably macabre penchant for 'how to fake your own death' searches. Strap on your seatbelts and charge up your neural networks, as we delve into the curious correlation between the geeky video titles of Technology Connections on YouTube and the obscure quest for faking one's demise.
Now, picture this: a world where the bizarre and the tech-savvy collide, where transistor trivia meets morbid musings, and where the search for technological enlightenment takes a detour into the realm of simulated expiration. Our quest begins with a light-hearted yet rigorous analysis of the YouTube video titles crafted by the ingenious mind behind Technology Connections. Armed with wit and whimsy, we set out to unravel the peculiar patterns hidden within these digital monikers.
As we venture deeper into this digital odyssey, we embrace the absurdity of our inquiry, recognizing that at the intersection of geekery and morbidity lies a trove of unexpected insights. With a twinkle in our statistical eyes, we employ the formidable might of AI-assisted analysis to decode the enigmatic relationship between these seemingly disparate domains. In doing so, we uncover a correlation coefficient that would make even the most stoic of statisticians do a double take – a dazzling 0.8420705, with p < 0.01, spanning the timeline of 2015 to 2023.
Before we proceed, it is only fitting to pause and revel in the sheer audacity of our endeavor. Who would have thought that the whimsical world of YouTube video titles could wield such influence over the virtual voyages of those seeking deceptive demises? The intersection of the geeky and the grim has never been more riveting – a testament to the unfathomable intricacies of our digital age.
With our hearts brimming with zeal and our hypotheses tinged with humor, we invite you to partake in this whimsical expedition, where the pursuit of knowledge dances hand in hand with the absurdities of human curiosity. So, join us as we uncover the secrets of techy tactics, where the allure of technology tangoes with the inexplicable allure of faking one's own demise. This investigation not only adds a playful spin to the annals of academic research but also paves the way for a lighthearted yet profound understanding of the multifaceted impact of technology on our online escapades.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:


[[METHODOLOGY]]

Now, let us embark on the zany ziggurat of our methodological madness, where the peculiar meets the practical, and the whimsical waltzes with the rigorous. Our data odyssey commenced with the procurement of geeky video titles from the illustrious repository of Technology Connections on YouTube, where the musings of ingenious minds intertwine with the jargon of circuitry and silicon. Armed with the fervor of data wranglers and the glee of tech enthusiasts, we meticulously compiled a corpus of titles spanning the technological timeline from 2015 to 2023, amidst the ever-evolving landscape of digital delights.

Having corralled this trove of titillating titles, we enlisted the aid of AI-assisted analysis, employing the wizardry of machine learning to discern the subtle nuances within the syntactic tapestries of these geeky gems. With algorithms whirring and circuits humming, we unleashed the computational prowess of our artificial cohorts to unravel the linguistic peculiarities that characterised the technological discourse permeating these video titles.

Simultaneously, in a parallel dimension of data wrangling, we ventured forth into the hallowed halls of Google Trends, where the ebbs and flows of online inquiries converge in a kaleidoscope of curiosities. Here, amid the digital tumult, we sought traces of the enigmatic quest for 'how to fake your own death', navigating the labyrinthine pathways of online searches with the tenacity of intrepid navigators.

The convergence of our dual data expeditions birthed a whimsical marvel – a correlation coefficient of 0.8420705, with p < 0.01, gleaming like a statistical sapphire amidst the empirical thicket. This revelatory result not only sparked giddy merriment within the chambers of quantitative inquiry but also beckoned us to behold the intersection of statistical significance and serendipitous whimsy.

In embracing this convoluted yet captivating journey, we navigated through the bountiful landscape of YouTube titles and the whimsical waves of Google search trends, uniting the seemingly incongruous in a merry minuet of data-driven discovery. Thus, with AI-assisted insights and statistical merriment in tow, we emerged victorious in deciphering the peculiar pathways through which geeky technology connections kindle the wayward wishes of clandestine demises, uncovering the whimsical undercurrents that underscore our digital voyages.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky Technology Connections YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'how to fake your own death'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends .

For the time period 2015 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8420705, r-squared of 0.7090828, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Techy Tactics: Tracing the Tendency Toward 'How to Fake Your Own Death' Searches with Geeky Technology Connections

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this tech-savvy study, we delve into the perplexing connection between the geeky video titles of Technology Connections on YouTube and online searches for 'how to fake your own death'. Utilizing an AI-assisted analysis of the video titles and Google Trends data, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8420705 with p < 0.01 for the duration of 2015 to 2023. Our findings not only shed light on the quirky influence of geeky tech content on peculiar search queries but also highlight the diverse and unconventional pathways through which technology impacts our online behaviors. This investigation offers a lighthearted yet intriguing perspective on the interplay between technology fascination and morbid curiosity, paving the way for further whimsical research in the realm of digital influence.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Welcome, fellow academics and enthusiasts of the peculiar and the preposterous, to our technologically twisted tale. In this delightfully geeky escapade, we embark on a riveting exploration of the interwoven realms of technology fascination and the inexplicably macabre penchant for 'how to fake your own death' searches. Strap on your seatbelts and charge up your neural networks, as we delve into the curious correlation between the geeky video titles of Technology Connections on YouTube and the obscure quest for faking one's demise.
Now, picture this: a world where the bizarre and the tech-savvy collide, where transistor trivia meets morbid musings, and where the search for technological enlightenment takes a detour into the realm of simulated expiration. Our quest begins with a light-hearted yet rigorous analysis of the YouTube video titles crafted by the ingenious mind behind Technology Connections. Armed with wit and whimsy, we set out to unravel the peculiar patterns hidden within these digital monikers.
As we venture deeper into this digital odyssey, we embrace the absurdity of our inquiry, recognizing that at the intersection of geekery and morbidity lies a trove of unexpected insights. With a twinkle in our statistical eyes, we employ the formidable might of AI-assisted analysis to decode the enigmatic relationship between these seemingly disparate domains. In doing so, we uncover a correlation coefficient that would make even the most stoic of statisticians do a double take – a dazzling 0.8420705, with p < 0.01, spanning the timeline of 2015 to 2023.
Before we proceed, it is only fitting to pause and revel in the sheer audacity of our endeavor. Who would have thought that the whimsical world of YouTube video titles could wield such influence over the virtual voyages of those seeking deceptive demises? The intersection of the geeky and the grim has never been more riveting – a testament to the unfathomable intricacies of our digital age.
With our hearts brimming with zeal and our hypotheses tinged with humor, we invite you to partake in this whimsical expedition, where the pursuit of knowledge dances hand in hand with the absurdities of human curiosity. So, join us as we uncover the secrets of techy tactics, where the allure of technology tangoes with the inexplicable allure of faking one's own demise. This investigation not only adds a playful spin to the annals of academic research but also paves the way for a lighthearted yet profound understanding of the multifaceted impact of technology on our online escapades.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The culmination of our intrepid journey into the quirky corridors of technology and the uncanny allure of simulated demises has yielded results that could make even the staunchest of academic eyebrows arch with bemusement. Our analysis, spanning the years 2015 to 2023, unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8420705, with an r-squared value of 0.7090828, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This remarkable correlation coefficient signifies a strong relationship between the geeky Technology Connections YouTube video titles and the rather morbid quest for information on faking one's own demise.

In true scientific fashion, we encapsulate this momentous finding in the form of a scatterplot (Fig. 1). Behold, the visual depiction of the unmistakable bond between the nerdy allure of technology content and the enigmatic magnetism of 'how to fake your own death' queries. The scatterplot stands as a testament to the offbeat juxtaposition of these seemingly incongruous realms, showcasing the robust correlation between video titles that delve into the fascinating depths of technology and the peculiar online pilgrimages in search of deceptive demises.

Our data not only solidifies the surprising association between geeky technology content and the quest for fictitious fatalities but also emboldens our whimsical spirit, affirming that even the most peculiar of research endeavors can yield illuminating insights. Thus, we stand at the crossroads of geekery and the macabre, grinning at the unexpected intersections where technology and morbidity intertwine, offering a mischievously thought-provoking lens into the intricacies of digital influence and human curiosity.

So, as we unravel the enigma of this unlikely correlation, we find ourselves not only savoring the statistical significance but also reveling in the delightful absurdity of our findings. The interplay of technology, trivia, and the tantalizing taboo of faked demises has bestowed upon us a whimsical revelation, underscoring the delightful absurdities that emerge from the haunts of academic investigation. Thus, we invite our esteemed peers to join us in celebrating the zany wonders of techy tactics and the unparalleled allure of offbeat research pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky Technology Connections YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'how to fake your own death'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Techy Tactics: Tracing the Tendency Toward 'How to Fake Your Own Death' Searches with Geeky Technology Connections

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this tech-savvy study, we delve into the perplexing connection between the geeky video titles of Technology Connections on YouTube and online searches for 'how to fake your own death'. Utilizing an AI-assisted analysis of the video titles and Google Trends data, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8420705 with p < 0.01 for the duration of 2015 to 2023. Our findings not only shed light on the quirky influence of geeky tech content on peculiar search queries but also highlight the diverse and unconventional pathways through which technology impacts our online behaviors. This investigation offers a lighthearted yet intriguing perspective on the interplay between technology fascination and morbid curiosity, paving the way for further whimsical research in the realm of digital influence.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The emergence of unconventional correlations within the digital domain has piqued the curiosity of researchers and enthusiasts alike. In this section, we delve into existing literature that uncovers the interplay between geeky technology content and inexplicable online search patterns, paving the way for our own whimsical exploration of the connection between the video titles of Technology Connections on YouTube and the enigmatic quest for 'how to fake your own death'.
Smith et al. (2018) delved into the realm of digital eccentricities and unearthed unexpected associations between seemingly unrelated phenomena. Their work laid the groundwork for our own investigation, challenging us to unravel the mysteries that lurk beneath the surface of seemingly trivial digital interactions. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2019) ventured into the technological frontier, shedding light on the nuances of online behavior and the myriad ways in which technology intertwines with our daily whims and fancies.
Building on the foundational works of these esteemed researchers, we venture into a spiral of whimsy and wonder, transcending the conventional confines of academic inquiry. As we navigate the juncture of geeky tech intrigue and the unconventional allure of simulated demises, we draw inspiration not only from scholarly literature but also from works that infuse quirk and levity into the exploration of human curiosities.
In "Digital Dilemmas: Navigating the Quirks and Quagmires of Online Oddities" (Steele, 2021), the author artfully charts a course through the labyrinthine landscapes of digital peculiarities, beckoning readers to ponder the unforeseen connections that bind our online pursuits. Furthermore, "Curiosities in Cyberspace: A Compendium of Unconventional Online Quests" (Blanchard, 2020) offers a whimsical foray into the realms of digital curiosities, intertwining the scholarly with the surreal to shed light on the inexplicable fascinations that permeate our online odysseys.
Straying from the traditional confines of empirical research, we draw inspiration from the unlikeliest of sources, recognizing that even fiction has its place in inspiring scholarly inquiries. The cryptic musings of "The Techno-Necromancer's Almanac" (Harper, 2017) beckon us to explore the enigmatic nexus of technology and mortal artifice, blurring the lines between the believable and the preposterous. Additionally, "Geekery and Grim Gauntlets: A Tale of Technological Intrigue" (Whittaker, 2019) presents a fantastical narrative that weaves together the surreal delights of technology and the unforeseen allure of morbid masquerades.
As our inquiry delves deeper into uncharted territories, we glean insight from the most unexpected wellsprings of wisdom. From the enigmatic prose of "The Mysteries of Metadata: A Quirky Quest for Digital Secrets" (Anonymous, 2020) to the lighthearted musings found in the backs of shampoo bottles, we embrace the whimsy that pervades our investigation, recognizing that the unconventional may hold the key to unlocking the mysteries that lie at the heart of our digital curiosities.

[[RESULTS]]
The culmination of our intrepid journey into the quirky corridors of technology and the uncanny allure of simulated demises has yielded results that could make even the staunchest of academic eyebrows arch with bemusement. Our analysis, spanning the years 2015 to 2023, unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8420705, with an r-squared value of 0.7090828, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This remarkable correlation coefficient signifies a strong relationship between the geeky Technology Connections YouTube video titles and the rather morbid quest for information on faking one's own demise.
In true scientific fashion, we encapsulate this momentous finding in the form of a scatterplot (Fig. 1). Behold, the visual depiction of the unmistakable bond between the nerdy allure of technology content and the enigmatic magnetism of 'how to fake your own death' queries. The scatterplot stands as a testament to the offbeat juxtaposition of these seemingly incongruous realms, showcasing the robust correlation between video titles that delve into the fascinating depths of technology and the peculiar online pilgrimages in search of deceptive demises.
Our data not only solidifies the surprising association between geeky technology content and the quest for fictitious fatalities but also emboldens our whimsical spirit, affirming that even the most peculiar of research endeavors can yield illuminating insights. Thus, we stand at the crossroads of geekery and the macabre, grinning at the unexpected intersections where technology and morbidity intertwine, offering a mischievously thought-provoking lens into the intricacies of digital influence and human curiosity.
So, as we unravel the enigma of this unlikely correlation, we find ourselves not only savoring the statistical significance but also reveling in the delightful absurdity of our findings. The interplay of technology, trivia, and the tantalizing taboo of faked demises has bestowed upon us a whimsical revelation, underscoring the delightful absurdities that emerge from the haunts of academic investigation. Thus, we invite our esteemed peers to join us in celebrating the zany wonders of techy tactics and the unparalleled allure of offbeat research pursuits.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

As we reflect upon our delightful romp through the realms of geekery and the grim, we find ourselves facing the stark truth - our findings have unearthed an unexpectedly strong correlation between the geeky video titles of Technology Connections on YouTube and the inquisitive searches for 'how to fake your own death'. Now, one might wonder, how on Earth does one conjure a connection between the two? Well, fear not, dear reader, for we shall elucidate!

Our results not only echo the findings of Smith et al. (2018) and Doe and Jones (2019), who ventured into the digital wilderness, but they also dance to the same quirky tune as the whimsical narratives of "Geekery and Grim Gauntlets: A Tale of Technological Intrigue" (Whittaker, 2019) and "The Mysteries of Metadata: A Quirky Quest for Digital Secrets" (Anonymous, 2020). Indeed, our study, with its distinct lightheartedness and methodological thoroughness, encapsulates the essence of these prior works, proving that even the most absurd of curiosities can lead to scientifically significant revelations.

The robust correlation coefficient we uncovered not only tickles the fancy of statistical aficionados but also beckons us to ponder the frivolities and fascinations that intertwine in the digital realm. It is a testament to the unexpected harmony between the techno-delights that pique our curiosity and the darker, albeit faux, pursuits that ignite our online expeditions.

This revelation, peppered with statistical significance and a dollop of whimsy, stands as a beacon of mirth amidst the often somber landscape of empirical inquiry. Indeed, we have demonstrated that even the most extraordinary of correlations can find resonance in the halls of academe, buoyed by the cheer of unexpected findings and the lighthearted tenacity with which we have steered this investigation.

As we bid adieu to this whimsical adventure, we invite our esteemed colleagues not only to marvel at the statistical robustness of our findings but also to revel in the irresistibly peculiar harmony of geeky tech and morbid musings. For in the end, it is the amalgamation of the absurd and the empirical that bestows upon us the sheer joy of scholarly inquiry. So, let us raise a figurative glass to the camaraderie of geeky tech and enigmatic searches, for in their dance, we find the delightfully unexpected rhythm of digital influence and human curiosity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How geeky Technology Connections YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'how to fake your own death'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Techy Tactics: Tracing the Tendency Toward 'How to Fake Your Own Death' Searches with Geeky Technology Connections

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this tech-savvy study, we delve into the perplexing connection between the geeky video titles of Technology Connections on YouTube and online searches for 'how to fake your own death'. Utilizing an AI-assisted analysis of the video titles and Google Trends data, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8420705 with p < 0.01 for the duration of 2015 to 2023. Our findings not only shed light on the quirky influence of geeky tech content on peculiar search queries but also highlight the diverse and unconventional pathways through which technology impacts our online behaviors. This investigation offers a lighthearted yet intriguing perspective on the interplay between technology fascination and morbid curiosity, paving the way for further whimsical research in the realm of digital influence.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Welcome, fellow academics and enthusiasts of the peculiar and the preposterous, to our technologically twisted tale. In this delightfully geeky escapade, we embark on a riveting exploration of the interwoven realms of technology fascination and the inexplicably macabre penchant for 'how to fake your own death' searches. Strap on your seatbelts and charge up your neural networks, as we delve into the curious correlation between the geeky video titles of Technology Connections on YouTube and the obscure quest for faking one's demise.
Now, picture this: a world where the bizarre and the tech-savvy collide, where transistor trivia meets morbid musings, and where the search for technological enlightenment takes a detour into the realm of simulated expiration. Our quest begins with a light-hearted yet rigorous analysis of the YouTube video titles crafted by the ingenious mind behind Technology Connections. Armed with wit and whimsy, we set out to unravel the peculiar patterns hidden within these digital monikers.
As we venture deeper into this digital odyssey, we embrace the absurdity of our inquiry, recognizing that at the intersection of geekery and morbidity lies a trove of unexpected insights. With a twinkle in our statistical eyes, we employ the formidable might of AI-assisted analysis to decode the enigmatic relationship between these seemingly disparate domains. In doing so, we uncover a correlation coefficient that would make even the most stoic of statisticians do a double take – a dazzling 0.8420705, with p < 0.01, spanning the timeline of 2015 to 2023.
Before we proceed, it is only fitting to pause and revel in the sheer audacity of our endeavor. Who would have thought that the whimsical world of YouTube video titles could wield such influence over the virtual voyages of those seeking deceptive demises? The intersection of the geeky and the grim has never been more riveting – a testament to the unfathomable intricacies of our digital age.
With our hearts brimming with zeal and our hypotheses tinged with humor, we invite you to partake in this whimsical expedition, where the pursuit of knowledge dances hand in hand with the absurdities of human curiosity. So, join us as we uncover the secrets of techy tactics, where the allure of technology tangoes with the inexplicable allure of faking one's own demise. This investigation not only adds a playful spin to the annals of academic research but also paves the way for a lighthearted yet profound understanding of the multifaceted impact of technology on our online escapades.

[[RESULTS]]
The culmination of our intrepid journey into the quirky corridors of technology and the uncanny allure of simulated demises has yielded results that could make even the staunchest of academic eyebrows arch with bemusement. Our analysis, spanning the years 2015 to 2023, unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8420705, with an r-squared value of 0.7090828, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This remarkable correlation coefficient signifies a strong relationship between the geeky Technology Connections YouTube video titles and the rather morbid quest for information on faking one's own demise.
In true scientific fashion, we encapsulate this momentous finding in the form of a scatterplot (Fig. 1). Behold, the visual depiction of the unmistakable bond between the nerdy allure of technology content and the enigmatic magnetism of 'how to fake your own death' queries. The scatterplot stands as a testament to the offbeat juxtaposition of these seemingly incongruous realms, showcasing the robust correlation between video titles that delve into the fascinating depths of technology and the peculiar online pilgrimages in search of deceptive demises.
Our data not only solidifies the surprising association between geeky technology content and the quest for fictitious fatalities but also emboldens our whimsical spirit, affirming that even the most peculiar of research endeavors can yield illuminating insights. Thus, we stand at the crossroads of geekery and the macabre, grinning at the unexpected intersections where technology and morbidity intertwine, offering a mischievously thought-provoking lens into the intricacies of digital influence and human curiosity.
So, as we unravel the enigma of this unlikely correlation, we find ourselves not only savoring the statistical significance but also reveling in the delightful absurdity of our findings. The interplay of technology, trivia, and the tantalizing taboo of faked demises has bestowed upon us a whimsical revelation, underscoring the delightful absurdities that emerge from the haunts of academic investigation. Thus, we invite our esteemed peers to join us in celebrating the zany wonders of techy tactics and the unparalleled allure of offbeat research pursuits.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, this whimsical escapade through the labyrinthine landscapes of geeky technology content and the enigmatic allure of faux finales has brought us to a place where statistics and silliness converge. Our investigation has not only unearthed a correlation coefficient that makes us want to break out in a statistical jig but has also illuminated the offbeat pathways through which digital content exerts its influence. The scatterplot depicting the correlation between the nerdy nuances of Technology Connections' video titles and the clandestine quests for faked fatalities stands as a testament to the unexpected symphony of science and silliness.

As we bid adieu to this riveting romp through the realms of geekery and the grim, we cannot help but marvel at the wondrous whimsies that emerge from the most unexpected of research inquiries. With a statistical wink and a playful nod to the peculiarities of human curiosity, we assert that no further research in this area is warranted. The bond between technology trivia and the quest for simulated demises has been illuminated – a delightfully droll conclusion to our inquiry. So, let us raise a beaker to the beguiling banter between binary brilliance and droll dark humor and bid adieu to this delightfully eccentric expedition.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Techy Tactics: Tracing the Tendency Toward 'How to Fake Your Own Death' Searches with Geeky Technology Connections. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Digital Deception Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Techy Tactics: Tracing the Tendency Toward 'How to Fake Your Own Death' Searches with Geeky Technology Connections. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Futuristic Follies and Fun Facts


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Techy Tactics: Tracing the Tendency Toward 'How to Fake Your Own Death' Searches with Geeky Technology Connections with an abstract of In this tech-savvy study, we delve into the perplexing connection between the geeky video titles of Technology Connections on YouTube and online searches for 'how to fake your own death'. Utilizing an AI-assisted analysis of the video titles and Google Trends data, we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8420705 with p < 0.01 for the duration of 2015 to 2023. Our findings not only shed light on the quirky influence of geeky tech content on peculiar search queries but also highlight the diverse and unconventional pathways through which technology impacts our online behaviors. This investigation offers a lighthearted yet intriguing perspective on the interplay between technology fascination and morbid curiosity, paving the way for further whimsical research in the realm of digital influence.

ChatGPT:

Technology Connections, YouTube, techy tactics, fake death searches, geeky technology, AI analysis, Google Trends, correlation coefficient, online behaviors, digital influence, technology fascination.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How geeky Technology Connections YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How geeky Technology Connections YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How geeky Technology Connections YouTube video titles are

Google searches for 'how to fake your own death'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to fake your own death' (Worldwide), with quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to fake your own death'

Correlation r = 0.8420705 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7090828 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 70.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'how to fake your own death') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How geeky Technology Connections YouTube video titles are) over the 9 years from 2015 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.004401. 0.0044006949904194384000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.84 in 0.4401% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 227 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.4, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201520162017201820192020202120222023
How geeky Technology Connections YouTube video titles are (Geeky score (out of 10))6.755.16.44446.26326.14294.89294.95835.10535.35
Google searches for 'how to fake your own death' (Rel. search volume)13.91678.1666711.916711.91676.833335.333334.083334.583332.66667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([6.75,5.1,6.4444,6.2632,6.1429,4.8929,4.9583,5.1053,5.35,])
array_2 = np.array([13.9167,8.16667,11.9167,11.9167,6.83333,5.33333,4.08333,4.58333,2.66667,])
array_1_name = "How geeky Technology Connections YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'how to fake your own death'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 5546 · Black Variable ID: 25711 · Red Variable ID: 1494
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0