about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,539 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Iesha and the second variable is Air pollution in Blytheville, Arkansas.  The chart goes from 1991 to 2005, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As fewer babies were named Iesha, there were fewer personalized license plates with her name on them, leading to a decrease in demand for novelty car accessories. This ultimately resulted in fewer unnecessary car trips to the store, thus reducing air pollution in Blytheville, Arkansas. Remember, sometimes a breath of fresh air is just a change in baby name trends away!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image in the style of a Discovery magazine cover featuring a serene suburban street in Blytheville, Arkansas. Show a noticeable decline in personalized license plates bearing the name "Iesha" on parked cars. Illustrate the reduction of novelty car accessories on display in local stores, with fewer visitors making unnecessary car trips. Depict cleaner, less congested roads and a reduction in air pollution, showcasing the positive environmental impact resulting from decreased car travel. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Iesha and Air pollution in Blytheville, Arkansas. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie A Discovery magazine cover image Charcoal An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Surrealism
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Iesha and Air pollution in Blytheville, Arkansas, in the following situation: As fewer babies were named Iesha, there were fewer personalized license plates with her name on them, leading to a decrease in demand for novelty car accessories. This ultimately resulted in fewer unnecessary car trips to the store, thus reducing air pollution in Blytheville, Arkansas. Remember, sometimes a breath of fresh air is just a change in baby name trends away!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Blytheville, Arkansas, the name "Iesha" began to see a decline in popularity, reflected in the decrease of personalized license plates with her name on them. As a result, there was a reduced demand for novelty car accessories, leading to fewer unnecessary car trips to the store. The cleaner, less congested roads in turn contributed to a reduction in air pollution in the area.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In Blytheville, Arkansas, the name "Iesha" began to see a decline in popularity, reflected in the decrease of personalized license plates with her name on them. As a result, there was a reduced demand for novelty car accessories, leading to fewer unnecessary car trips to the store. The cleaner, less congested roads in turn contributed to a reduction in air pollution in the area. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image in the style of a Discovery magazine cover featuring a serene suburban street in Blytheville, Arkansas. Show a noticeable decline in personalized license plates bearing the name "Iesha" on parked cars. Illustrate the reduction of novelty car accessories on display in local stores, with fewer visitors making unnecessary car trips. Depict cleaner, less congested roads and a reduction in air pollution, showcasing the positive environmental impact resulting from decreased car travel.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Iesha caused Air pollution in Blytheville, Arkansas to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Iesha Effect: A Breath of Fresh Air or Just Hot Air?

The Journal of Sociolinguistic Phenomena

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Iesha and Air pollution in Blytheville, Arkansas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9164711 and p < 0.01 for 1991 to 2005.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The "Iesha" Effect: A Breath of Fresh Air or Just Hot Air?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name "Iesha" and air pollution levels in Blytheville, Arkansas. By utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team sought to uncover the curious relationship between a name and air quality. The correlation coefficient of 0.9164711 with p < 0.01, spanning the years 1991 to 2005, raised both eyebrows and questions. It appears that the mere mention of "Iesha" may be linked to environmental changes in this small Arkansas town. This investigation provokes further contemplation on the interplay between societal trends and environmental phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Iesha and Air pollution in Blytheville, Arkansas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The "Iesha" Effect: A Breath of Fresh Air or Just Hot Air?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name "Iesha" and air pollution levels in Blytheville, Arkansas. By utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team sought to uncover the curious relationship between a name and air quality. The correlation coefficient of 0.9164711 with p < 0.01, spanning the years 1991 to 2005, raised both eyebrows and questions. It appears that the mere mention of "Iesha" may be linked to environmental changes in this small Arkansas town. This investigation provokes further contemplation on the interplay between societal trends and environmental phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The "Iesha" Effect has captured the attention of not only the academic community but also the local residents of Blytheville, Arkansas. While the connection between a person's name and air pollution may seem like an unlikely pairing at first glance, our research aims to unearth the mysterious relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables – a task that is as challenging as identifying a statistical outlier in a dataset.

In this age of big data and algorithms, it is essential to investigate unconventional associations, as ignoring them may result in missed opportunities or, in this case, overlooked atmospheric patterns. The unexpected correlation between the popularity of the name "Iesha" and air pollution levels in Blytheville raises intriguing questions about the interplay between human behavior and environmental indicators. It is almost as perplexing as attempting to determine causation from a mere correlation – a task that often feels as futile as chasing a wild goose across a mathematical landscape.

Our curiosity was piqued by the remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9164711, with a p-value indicating statistical significance at p < 0.01. One could say that the relationship between "Iesha" and air pollution levels is as striking as a genetic mutation in a controlled study. As we delve into the data spanning the years 1991 to 2005, we aim to shed light on this intriguing "Iesha" effect and its implications for both social trends and environmental vitality in this charming Arkansas town.

It is our hope that this research will not only contribute to the growing body of knowledge in the realm of unexpected correlations but also provide a moment of scientific amusement amidst the often dry landscape of academic inquiry. Join us in this exploration of the "Iesha" effect as we venture into the uncharted territories of whimsical statistical associations and their potential impact on the environment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Iesha and Air pollution in Blytheville, Arkansas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The "Iesha" Effect: A Breath of Fresh Air or Just Hot Air?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name "Iesha" and air pollution levels in Blytheville, Arkansas. By utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team sought to uncover the curious relationship between a name and air quality. The correlation coefficient of 0.9164711 with p < 0.01, spanning the years 1991 to 2005, raised both eyebrows and questions. It appears that the mere mention of "Iesha" may be linked to environmental changes in this small Arkansas town. This investigation provokes further contemplation on the interplay between societal trends and environmental phenomena.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The "Iesha" Effect has captured the attention of not only the academic community but also the local residents of Blytheville, Arkansas. While the connection between a person's name and air pollution may seem like an unlikely pairing at first glance, our research aims to unearth the mysterious relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables – a task that is as challenging as identifying a statistical outlier in a dataset.
In this age of big data and algorithms, it is essential to investigate unconventional associations, as ignoring them may result in missed opportunities or, in this case, overlooked atmospheric patterns. The unexpected correlation between the popularity of the name "Iesha" and air pollution levels in Blytheville raises intriguing questions about the interplay between human behavior and environmental indicators. It is almost as perplexing as attempting to determine causation from a mere correlation – a task that often feels as futile as chasing a wild goose across a mathematical landscape.
Our curiosity was piqued by the remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9164711, with a p-value indicating statistical significance at p < 0.01. One could say that the relationship between "Iesha" and air pollution levels is as striking as a genetic mutation in a controlled study. As we delve into the data spanning the years 1991 to 2005, we aim to shed light on this intriguing "Iesha" effect and its implications for both social trends and environmental vitality in this charming Arkansas town.
It is our hope that this research will not only contribute to the growing body of knowledge in the realm of unexpected correlations but also provide a moment of scientific amusement amidst the often dry landscape of academic inquiry. Join us in this exploration of the "Iesha" effect as we venture into the uncharted territories of whimsical statistical associations and their potential impact on the environment.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The authors find that the influence of personal names on environmental variables is a relatively underexplored area. Nevertheless, the growing interest in the impact of societal trends on environmental phenomena has prompted a reexamination of seemingly unrelated factors. Smith (2010) observes a parallel between the rise in popularity of the first name "Aiden" and an increase in the sales of organic produce in the greater Portland area. Similarly, Doe (2015) highlights the correlation between the prevalence of the name "Madison" and the frequency of bicycle commuter accidents in urban centers. Jones (2018) delves into the connection between the name "Chad" and regional precipitation patterns in the Midwest.

In "Fresh Air: What Happens When You Discover the Air You Breathe Is Your Very Own" by Wheeler (2016), the author discusses the importance of air quality and its impact on personal health. The work provides a comprehensive overview of air pollution and its potential effects on communities, laying a solid foundation for understanding the implications of the "Iesha" effect.

Turning to the world of fiction, the literary classics "Great Expectations" by Dickens (1861) and "Light in August" by Faulkner (1932) offer insightful narratives on the societal norms and individual identities, inviting contemplation on the potential influence of names on personal destinies and, dare we say, atmospheric conditions.

Inspiration can also be drawn from popular board games such as "Environmental Dominoes" and "Air Quality Monopoly," which, while not directly related to the topic at hand, serve as lighthearted reminders of the interconnectedness of human activities and environmental factors.

The confluence of these diverse sources sets the stage for a comprehensive investigation into the "Iesha" effect and its unexpected implications for the environment in Blytheville, Arkansas.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Iesha and Air pollution in Blytheville, Arkansas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 1991 to 2005

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The "Iesha" Effect: A Breath of Fresh Air or Just Hot Air?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name "Iesha" and air pollution levels in Blytheville, Arkansas. By utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team sought to uncover the curious relationship between a name and air quality. The correlation coefficient of 0.9164711 with p < 0.01, spanning the years 1991 to 2005, raised both eyebrows and questions. It appears that the mere mention of "Iesha" may be linked to environmental changes in this small Arkansas town. This investigation provokes further contemplation on the interplay between societal trends and environmental phenomena.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The "Iesha" Effect has captured the attention of not only the academic community but also the local residents of Blytheville, Arkansas. While the connection between a person's name and air pollution may seem like an unlikely pairing at first glance, our research aims to unearth the mysterious relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables – a task that is as challenging as identifying a statistical outlier in a dataset.
In this age of big data and algorithms, it is essential to investigate unconventional associations, as ignoring them may result in missed opportunities or, in this case, overlooked atmospheric patterns. The unexpected correlation between the popularity of the name "Iesha" and air pollution levels in Blytheville raises intriguing questions about the interplay between human behavior and environmental indicators. It is almost as perplexing as attempting to determine causation from a mere correlation – a task that often feels as futile as chasing a wild goose across a mathematical landscape.
Our curiosity was piqued by the remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9164711, with a p-value indicating statistical significance at p < 0.01. One could say that the relationship between "Iesha" and air pollution levels is as striking as a genetic mutation in a controlled study. As we delve into the data spanning the years 1991 to 2005, we aim to shed light on this intriguing "Iesha" effect and its implications for both social trends and environmental vitality in this charming Arkansas town.
It is our hope that this research will not only contribute to the growing body of knowledge in the realm of unexpected correlations but also provide a moment of scientific amusement amidst the often dry landscape of academic inquiry. Join us in this exploration of the "Iesha" effect as we venture into the uncharted territories of whimsical statistical associations and their potential impact on the environment.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
The data for this study was gathered meticulously from various sources, with the precision of a watchmaker assembling tiny gears. The primary sources included the US Social Security Administration for information on the popularity of the first name "Iesha" and the Environmental Protection Agency for air pollution levels in Blytheville, Arkansas. These data sources were mined like precious minerals from the vast landscape of the internet, with a keen eye for accuracy and a touch of digital finesse. The time period of 1991 to 2005 was selected to capture the historical nuances of the "Iesha" phenomenon and its potential impact on the atmospheric ecosystem in Blytheville.

Data Analysis:
The quantitative analysis of the data involved a series of rigorous statistical tests, akin to subjecting a rubber duck to the trials of a competitive swim meet. The correlation between the popularity of the first name "Iesha" and air pollution levels in Blytheville was examined using Pearson's correlation coefficient, with the air pollution levels serving as the independent variable and the frequency of the name "Iesha" as the dependent variable. This analytical approach allowed for the exploration of potential relationships between societal nomenclature and environmental fluctuations, offering a glimpse into the whimsical dance of human nomenclature and atmospheric composition.

Statistical Significance:
To assess the robustness of the observed relationship, a hypothesis test was conducted with a critical value of p < 0.01, providing a threshold akin to distinguishing a rare bird amidst a flock of mundane pigeons. The statistical significance of the correlation coefficient was determined with the precision of a master archer hitting the bullseye, signaling the presence of a compelling association between the ebb and flow of "Iesha" and the atmospheric pulse of Blytheville.

Control Variables:
In an effort to ensure the integrity of the analysis, control variables such as population demographics, industrial activities, and meteorological conditions were considered, akin to conducting a symphony where each instrument plays a crucial role in the harmonious composition of the research findings. These control variables were meticulously curated to account for potential confounding factors that could sway the interpretation of the "Iesha" effect on air pollution levels, providing a harmonious backdrop against which the relationship could be delineated with clarity.

In conclusion, the methodology employed in this study was purposefully crafted to unravel the enigmatic bond between the first name "Iesha" and air pollution in Blytheville, Arkansas, offering a unique blend of scientific rigor and whimsical curiosity in the pursuit of knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Iesha and Air pollution in Blytheville, Arkansas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency .

For the time period 1991 to 2005, you found a correlation 0.9164711, r-squared of 0.8399193, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The "Iesha" Effect: A Breath of Fresh Air or Just Hot Air?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name "Iesha" and air pollution levels in Blytheville, Arkansas. By utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team sought to uncover the curious relationship between a name and air quality. The correlation coefficient of 0.9164711 with p < 0.01, spanning the years 1991 to 2005, raised both eyebrows and questions. It appears that the mere mention of "Iesha" may be linked to environmental changes in this small Arkansas town. This investigation provokes further contemplation on the interplay between societal trends and environmental phenomena.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The "Iesha" Effect has captured the attention of not only the academic community but also the local residents of Blytheville, Arkansas. While the connection between a person's name and air pollution may seem like an unlikely pairing at first glance, our research aims to unearth the mysterious relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables – a task that is as challenging as identifying a statistical outlier in a dataset.
In this age of big data and algorithms, it is essential to investigate unconventional associations, as ignoring them may result in missed opportunities or, in this case, overlooked atmospheric patterns. The unexpected correlation between the popularity of the name "Iesha" and air pollution levels in Blytheville raises intriguing questions about the interplay between human behavior and environmental indicators. It is almost as perplexing as attempting to determine causation from a mere correlation – a task that often feels as futile as chasing a wild goose across a mathematical landscape.
Our curiosity was piqued by the remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9164711, with a p-value indicating statistical significance at p < 0.01. One could say that the relationship between "Iesha" and air pollution levels is as striking as a genetic mutation in a controlled study. As we delve into the data spanning the years 1991 to 2005, we aim to shed light on this intriguing "Iesha" effect and its implications for both social trends and environmental vitality in this charming Arkansas town.
It is our hope that this research will not only contribute to the growing body of knowledge in the realm of unexpected correlations but also provide a moment of scientific amusement amidst the often dry landscape of academic inquiry. Join us in this exploration of the "Iesha" effect as we venture into the uncharted territories of whimsical statistical associations and their potential impact on the environment.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The data analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the first name "Iesha" and air pollution levels in Blytheville, Arkansas. The correlation coefficient of 0.9164711 provides solid evidence that there is indeed a connection between the frequency of this particular name and the quality of the air in this charming town. This correlation coefficient is as strong as a titanium alloy, leaving little room for doubt about the relationship between "Iesha" and air pollution levels.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8399193 suggests that an impressive 83.99% of the variability in air pollution levels can be explained by the popularity of the name "Iesha." This finding is as eye-catching as a fireworks display on New Year's Eve, illuminating the substantial impact of the "Iesha" variable on air quality.

The p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of this relationship, leaving no room for doubt that the association between the name "Iesha" and air pollution in Blytheville is not mere happenstance. This level of significance is as rare as finding a four-leaf clover in a statistical field, emphasizing the robustness of the observed connection.

As displayed in Figure 1, the scatterplot vividly illustrates the strong positive correlation between the popularity of the first name "Iesha" and air pollution levels in Blytheville. The data points are as tightly clustered as particles in a crystalline structure, showcasing the striking relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Overall, the results of this investigation signify a compelling link between the prevalence of the name "Iesha" and the atmospheric conditions in Blytheville, Arkansas, prompting further inquiry into the whimsical world of unexpected statistical associations and their potential impact on the environment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Iesha and Air pollution in Blytheville, Arkansas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The "Iesha" Effect: A Breath of Fresh Air or Just Hot Air?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name "Iesha" and air pollution levels in Blytheville, Arkansas. By utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team sought to uncover the curious relationship between a name and air quality. The correlation coefficient of 0.9164711 with p < 0.01, spanning the years 1991 to 2005, raised both eyebrows and questions. It appears that the mere mention of "Iesha" may be linked to environmental changes in this small Arkansas town. This investigation provokes further contemplation on the interplay between societal trends and environmental phenomena.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The authors find that the influence of personal names on environmental variables is a relatively underexplored area. Nevertheless, the growing interest in the impact of societal trends on environmental phenomena has prompted a reexamination of seemingly unrelated factors. Smith (2010) observes a parallel between the rise in popularity of the first name "Aiden" and an increase in the sales of organic produce in the greater Portland area. Similarly, Doe (2015) highlights the correlation between the prevalence of the name "Madison" and the frequency of bicycle commuter accidents in urban centers. Jones (2018) delves into the connection between the name "Chad" and regional precipitation patterns in the Midwest.
In "Fresh Air: What Happens When You Discover the Air You Breathe Is Your Very Own" by Wheeler (2016), the author discusses the importance of air quality and its impact on personal health. The work provides a comprehensive overview of air pollution and its potential effects on communities, laying a solid foundation for understanding the implications of the "Iesha" effect.
Turning to the world of fiction, the literary classics "Great Expectations" by Dickens (1861) and "Light in August" by Faulkner (1932) offer insightful narratives on the societal norms and individual identities, inviting contemplation on the potential influence of names on personal destinies and, dare we say, atmospheric conditions.
Inspiration can also be drawn from popular board games such as "Environmental Dominoes" and "Air Quality Monopoly," which, while not directly related to the topic at hand, serve as lighthearted reminders of the interconnectedness of human activities and environmental factors.
The confluence of these diverse sources sets the stage for a comprehensive investigation into the "Iesha" effect and its unexpected implications for the environment in Blytheville, Arkansas.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the first name "Iesha" and air pollution levels in Blytheville, Arkansas. The correlation coefficient of 0.9164711 provides solid evidence that there is indeed a connection between the frequency of this particular name and the quality of the air in this charming town. This correlation coefficient is as strong as a titanium alloy, leaving little room for doubt about the relationship between "Iesha" and air pollution levels.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8399193 suggests that an impressive 83.99% of the variability in air pollution levels can be explained by the popularity of the name "Iesha." This finding is as eye-catching as a fireworks display on New Year's Eve, illuminating the substantial impact of the "Iesha" variable on air quality.
The p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of this relationship, leaving no room for doubt that the association between the name "Iesha" and air pollution in Blytheville is not mere happenstance. This level of significance is as rare as finding a four-leaf clover in a statistical field, emphasizing the robustness of the observed connection.
As displayed in Figure 1, the scatterplot vividly illustrates the strong positive correlation between the popularity of the first name "Iesha" and air pollution levels in Blytheville. The data points are as tightly clustered as particles in a crystalline structure, showcasing the striking relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables.
Overall, the results of this investigation signify a compelling link between the prevalence of the name "Iesha" and the atmospheric conditions in Blytheville, Arkansas, prompting further inquiry into the whimsical world of unexpected statistical associations and their potential impact on the environment.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study have brought to light an astonishing relationship between the popularity of the first name "Iesha" and air pollution levels in Blytheville, Arkansas. Our results provide empirical support for the notion that seemingly unrelated variables can, in fact, exhibit a substantial correlation, akin to a surprising chemistry experiment yielding unexpected results. This unexpected connection underscores the intricate interplay between societal trends and environmental phenomena, shedding new light on the potential influence of personal names on atmospheric conditions.

Our results align with prior research that has explored the influence of societal trends on environmental variables. The thorough investigations conducted by Smith (2010), Doe (2015), and Jones (2018) have underscored the nontrivial impact of personal names on diverse environmental phenomena. The correlation observed in our study between the prevalence of the name "Iesha" and air pollution levels in Blytheville echoes the unexpected findings of previous studies, thus reinforcing the emerging paradigm of the influence of names on environmental factors. This parallel discovery serves as a reminder of the multifaceted and often capricious nature of statistical associations, prompting a whimsical exploration of the "Iesha" effect and its implications for the environment.

The strong correlation coefficient of 0.9164711 in our study illuminates the robustness of the relationship between the popularity of the name "Iesha" and air pollution levels in Blytheville. This striking correlation, as substantial as a newly discovered planetary alignment, highlights the significant impact of the "Iesha" variable on atmospheric conditions. Furthermore, the high r-squared value of 0.8399193 underscores the substantial explanatory power of the "Iesha" variable, capturing a noteworthy 83.99% of the variability in air pollution levels. This remarkable finding, akin to uncovering a hidden treasure trove of explanatory prowess, emphasizes the influential role of the "Iesha" variable in shaping air quality in this charming town.

The statistical significance of our results, as evidenced by the p-value of less than 0.01, underscores the robustness of the observed relationship between the prevalence of the name "Iesha" and air pollution levels in Blytheville. This level of significance, as rare as discovering a statistical unicorn, reaffirms the credibility of our findings and dispels any lingering doubts about the authenticity of the observed association. The vivid portrayal of this relationship in the scatterplot, as tightly clustered as a herd of statistical sheep, serves as a visual testament to the striking connection between the popularity of the first name "Iesha" and air pollution levels in Blytheville.

In summary, our study has revealed a compelling link between the frequency of the name "Iesha" and atmospheric conditions in Blytheville, Arkansas, thereby inviting further inquiry into the amusing realm of unexpected statistical associations and their potential impact on the environment. This unexpected association between a personal name and air pollution levels challenges traditional perspectives and beckons the scientific community to embrace the whimsical and sometimes enigmatic nature of statistical relationships.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Iesha and Air pollution in Blytheville, Arkansas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The "Iesha" Effect: A Breath of Fresh Air or Just Hot Air?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name "Iesha" and air pollution levels in Blytheville, Arkansas. By utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team sought to uncover the curious relationship between a name and air quality. The correlation coefficient of 0.9164711 with p < 0.01, spanning the years 1991 to 2005, raised both eyebrows and questions. It appears that the mere mention of "Iesha" may be linked to environmental changes in this small Arkansas town. This investigation provokes further contemplation on the interplay between societal trends and environmental phenomena.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The "Iesha" Effect has captured the attention of not only the academic community but also the local residents of Blytheville, Arkansas. While the connection between a person's name and air pollution may seem like an unlikely pairing at first glance, our research aims to unearth the mysterious relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables – a task that is as challenging as identifying a statistical outlier in a dataset.
In this age of big data and algorithms, it is essential to investigate unconventional associations, as ignoring them may result in missed opportunities or, in this case, overlooked atmospheric patterns. The unexpected correlation between the popularity of the name "Iesha" and air pollution levels in Blytheville raises intriguing questions about the interplay between human behavior and environmental indicators. It is almost as perplexing as attempting to determine causation from a mere correlation – a task that often feels as futile as chasing a wild goose across a mathematical landscape.
Our curiosity was piqued by the remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9164711, with a p-value indicating statistical significance at p < 0.01. One could say that the relationship between "Iesha" and air pollution levels is as striking as a genetic mutation in a controlled study. As we delve into the data spanning the years 1991 to 2005, we aim to shed light on this intriguing "Iesha" effect and its implications for both social trends and environmental vitality in this charming Arkansas town.
It is our hope that this research will not only contribute to the growing body of knowledge in the realm of unexpected correlations but also provide a moment of scientific amusement amidst the often dry landscape of academic inquiry. Join us in this exploration of the "Iesha" effect as we venture into the uncharted territories of whimsical statistical associations and their potential impact on the environment.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the first name "Iesha" and air pollution levels in Blytheville, Arkansas. The correlation coefficient of 0.9164711 provides solid evidence that there is indeed a connection between the frequency of this particular name and the quality of the air in this charming town. This correlation coefficient is as strong as a titanium alloy, leaving little room for doubt about the relationship between "Iesha" and air pollution levels.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8399193 suggests that an impressive 83.99% of the variability in air pollution levels can be explained by the popularity of the name "Iesha." This finding is as eye-catching as a fireworks display on New Year's Eve, illuminating the substantial impact of the "Iesha" variable on air quality.
The p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of this relationship, leaving no room for doubt that the association between the name "Iesha" and air pollution in Blytheville is not mere happenstance. This level of significance is as rare as finding a four-leaf clover in a statistical field, emphasizing the robustness of the observed connection.
As displayed in Figure 1, the scatterplot vividly illustrates the strong positive correlation between the popularity of the first name "Iesha" and air pollution levels in Blytheville. The data points are as tightly clustered as particles in a crystalline structure, showcasing the striking relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables.
Overall, the results of this investigation signify a compelling link between the prevalence of the name "Iesha" and the atmospheric conditions in Blytheville, Arkansas, prompting further inquiry into the whimsical world of unexpected statistical associations and their potential impact on the environment.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the "Iesha" effect has unveiled a correlation so strong, it's like trying to separate two inseparable protons in a particle accelerator. The data speaks for itself - the popularity of the name "Iesha" is as intertwined with air pollution levels in Blytheville, Arkansas as DNA is with genetic traits.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9164711, akin to a solid oak tree in statistical terms, leaves little room for skepticism about the link between "Iesha" and air quality. This unexpected connection is as surprising as stumbling upon a unicorn in a data set – a delightful anomaly that begs for further exploration.

The r-squared value of 0.8399193 highlights the substantial impact of the "Iesha" variable on air quality, akin to a pop star's influence on a devoted fan base. The p-value, less than 0.01, is as rare as a statistically significant unicorn sighting, emphasizing the validity of this zany association.

Our findings suggest that the "Iesha" effect is not merely a statistical artifact, but a peculiar phenomenon that calls for a closer look at the whimsical world of unlikely correlations. It is almost as mysterious as dark matter in the statistical universe – a force to be reckoned with, yet beguiling in its enigmatic nature.

As we reflect on the implications of our research, it is abundantly clear that no more research is needed in this area. We have surely exhausted the limits of statistical absurdity, and any further exploration would be as futile as searching for a needle in a statistical haystack. Thus, we can confidently conclude that the "Iesha" effect is a statistical quirk that defies explanation, leaving us with a quirky scientific mystery that adds a touch of whimsy to the often sober world of research and inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Iesha Effect: A Breath of Fresh Air or Just Hot Air?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Sociolinguistic Phenomena


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Iesha Effect: A Breath of Fresh Air or Just Hot Air?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Atmospheric Quirkology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Iesha Effect: A Breath of Fresh Air or Just Hot Air? with an abstract of This paper examines the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the first name "Iesha" and air pollution levels in Blytheville, Arkansas. By utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team sought to uncover the curious relationship between a name and air quality. The correlation coefficient of 0.9164711 with p < 0.01, spanning the years 1991 to 2005, raised both eyebrows and questions. It appears that the mere mention of "Iesha" may be linked to environmental changes in this small Arkansas town. This investigation provokes further contemplation on the interplay between societal trends and environmental phenomena.

ChatGPT:

"Iesha name popularity," "air pollution levels Blytheville Arkansas," "correlation between name and air quality," "US Social Security Administration data," "Environmental Protection Agency air quality data," "name trends and environmental changes," "societal trends and environmental phenomena"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Iesha
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Iesha
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Iesha

Air pollution in Blytheville, Arkansas
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Blytheville, AR
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Blytheville, Arkansas

Correlation r = 0.9164711 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8399193 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air pollution in Blytheville, Arkansas) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Iesha) over the 15 years from 1991 through 2005.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.6E-6. 0.0000015751962826414977000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 0.00016% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 634,842 random variables You don't actually need 634 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.76, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005
Popularity of the first name Iesha (Babies born)190558138432131827816711598909363485442
Air pollution in Blytheville, Arkansas (Bad air quality days)0.29670300000000000.00900901000.045045




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1905,581,384,321,318,278,167,115,98,90,93,63,48,54,42,])
array_2 = np.array([0.296703,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.00900901,0,0,0.045045,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Iesha"
array_2_name = "Air pollution in Blytheville, Arkansas"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 5539 · Black Variable ID: 3341 · Red Variable ID: 22281
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0