about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,534 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Killian and the second variable is Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland.  The chart goes from 1982 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

There has been a secret society of Libertarian parents who have been strategically naming their children Killian in order to ensure future support for the party. It seems to be working, as the number of little Kilians running around has a surprisingly strong influence on the political landscape. Who knew that a popular baby name could have such an impact on election results? It's like a mini-revolution happening right in the nursery!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a lively scene inspired by Bauhaus, set in a bustling Maryland nursery. In the foreground, a sea of playful toddlers fills the room, with little Kilians merrily toddling about and their name tags proudly displaying "Killian." In the corner, an election polling station is set up, with parents casting their votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate. The presence of the numerous Kilians creates a buzz, with parents interacting and discussing their candidate choice, influenced by the surprising popularity of the name. The nursery has turned into an unexpected hub of political activity, with the youthful impact of the little Kilians setting the stage for a unique and intriguing election outcome. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Killian and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A scene from Skyrim a funny image macro inspired by bauhaus a funny image macro Glitch art
ChatGPT: inspired by bauhaus

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Killian and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland, in the following situation: There has been a secret society of Libertarian parents who have been strategically naming their children Killian in order to ensure future support for the party. It seems to be working, as the number of little Kilians running around has a surprisingly strong influence on the political landscape. Who knew that a popular baby name could have such an impact on election results? It's like a mini-revolution happening right in the nursery!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Maryland nursery, a sea of playful toddlers fills the room. Among them, little Kilians merrily toddle about, their name tags proudly displaying "Killian." Meanwhile, an election polling station is set up in the corner, with parents casting their votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate. The presence of the numerous Kilians seems to create a buzz, with parents interacting and discussing their candidate choice, influenced by the surprising popularity of the name. The nursery has turned into an unexpected hub of political activity, with the youthful impact of the little Kilians setting the stage for a unique and intriguing election outcome.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ inspired by bauhaus ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Maryland nursery, a sea of playful toddlers fills the room. Among them, little Kilians merrily toddle about, their name tags proudly displaying "Killian." Meanwhile, an election polling station is set up in the corner, with parents casting their votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate. The presence of the numerous Kilians seems to create a buzz, with parents interacting and discussing their candidate choice, influenced by the surprising popularity of the name. The nursery has turned into an unexpected hub of political activity, with the youthful impact of the little Kilians setting the stage for a unique and intriguing election outcome. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a lively scene inspired by Bauhaus, set in a bustling Maryland nursery. In the foreground, a sea of playful toddlers fills the room, with little Kilians merrily toddling about and their name tags proudly displaying "Killian." In the corner, an election polling station is set up, with parents casting their votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate. The presence of the numerous Kilians creates a buzz, with parents interacting and discussing their candidate choice, influenced by the surprising popularity of the name. The nursery has turned into an unexpected hub of political activity, with the youthful impact of the little Kilians setting the stage for a unique and intriguing election outcome.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Killian caused Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Libertarianism and the Name Game: Analyzing the Impact of 'Killian' on Maryland Presidential Votes

The Journal of Political Namology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Killian and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9205674 and p < 0.01 for 1982 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Libertarianism and the Name Game: Analyzing the Impact of 'Killian' on Maryland Presidential Votes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we not only crunch numbers, but also tackle the whimsical and weird world of name popularity and political preferences. We dive deep into the data with a lighthearted touch to explore the surprising correlation between the frequency of the name 'Killian' and the votes received by Libertarian presidential candidates in the state of Maryland. As researchers, we aim to bring both statistical rigor and a sense of humor to our investigation. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9205674 and a p-value less than 0.01, spanning from 1982 to 2020. Join us on this wild journey as we unravel the quirks and curiosities of the intersection between names, politics, and human behavior. After all, who knew that a name could wield such influence over the political game?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Killian and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Libertarianism and the Name Game: Analyzing the Impact of 'Killian' on Maryland Presidential Votes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we not only crunch numbers, but also tackle the whimsical and weird world of name popularity and political preferences. We dive deep into the data with a lighthearted touch to explore the surprising correlation between the frequency of the name 'Killian' and the votes received by Libertarian presidential candidates in the state of Maryland. As researchers, we aim to bring both statistical rigor and a sense of humor to our investigation. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9205674 and a p-value less than 0.01, spanning from 1982 to 2020. Join us on this wild journey as we unravel the quirks and curiosities of the intersection between names, politics, and human behavior. After all, who knew that a name could wield such influence over the political game?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Welcome to the zany world of political research, where we dig deep into the wacky and whimsical to uncover unexpected connections between human behavior and seemingly unrelated variables. In this paper, we boldly venture into the uncharted territory of name popularity and its unlikely association with political leanings. Buckle up, because we are about to embark on a thrilling and unpredictable journey through the statistical realm of 'Killian' namesakes and their impact on Libertarian presidential votes in the state of Maryland.

As intrepid researchers, we don our lab coats and unleash our wit to explore this fascinating phenomenon. After all, who wouldn't be intrigued by the sheer oddity of a name covertly wielding influence over the unfolding drama of political elections? It's like a quirky subplot in the grand saga of statistics and human behavior, where the protagonist is a seemingly innocent name with the ominous potential to sway electoral outcomes.

We embark on this quest armed with an arsenal of statistical tools, a hearty dose of curiosity, and, of course, an appreciation for the absurdities that often lurk within scientific inquiries. Because, let's face it, what's the fun in research if we can't sprinkle in a few puns and unexpected twists along the way? So, grab your pocket protector and strap on your thinking cap, because we are about to plunge headfirst into the enigmatic correlation between the name 'Killian' and the votes garnered by Libertarian presidential candidates in the quirky realm of Maryland politics.

Prepare yourself for a delightfully unconventional ride through the intersection of nomenclature and political preferences. Get ready to unravel the mystery of how a name can stealthily exert its influence on ballots and manifest as a significant statistical association. And above all, get ready to embrace the whimsical and weird as we navigate the unexpected intricacies of our offbeat investigation. After all, in the world of research, sometimes the most outlandish connections yield the most captivating insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Killian and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Libertarianism and the Name Game: Analyzing the Impact of 'Killian' on Maryland Presidential Votes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we not only crunch numbers, but also tackle the whimsical and weird world of name popularity and political preferences. We dive deep into the data with a lighthearted touch to explore the surprising correlation between the frequency of the name 'Killian' and the votes received by Libertarian presidential candidates in the state of Maryland. As researchers, we aim to bring both statistical rigor and a sense of humor to our investigation. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9205674 and a p-value less than 0.01, spanning from 1982 to 2020. Join us on this wild journey as we unravel the quirks and curiosities of the intersection between names, politics, and human behavior. After all, who knew that a name could wield such influence over the political game?

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Welcome to the zany world of political research, where we dig deep into the wacky and whimsical to uncover unexpected connections between human behavior and seemingly unrelated variables. In this paper, we boldly venture into the uncharted territory of name popularity and its unlikely association with political leanings. Buckle up, because we are about to embark on a thrilling and unpredictable journey through the statistical realm of 'Killian' namesakes and their impact on Libertarian presidential votes in the state of Maryland.
As intrepid researchers, we don our lab coats and unleash our wit to explore this fascinating phenomenon. After all, who wouldn't be intrigued by the sheer oddity of a name covertly wielding influence over the unfolding drama of political elections? It's like a quirky subplot in the grand saga of statistics and human behavior, where the protagonist is a seemingly innocent name with the ominous potential to sway electoral outcomes.
We embark on this quest armed with an arsenal of statistical tools, a hearty dose of curiosity, and, of course, an appreciation for the absurdities that often lurk within scientific inquiries. Because, let's face it, what's the fun in research if we can't sprinkle in a few puns and unexpected twists along the way? So, grab your pocket protector and strap on your thinking cap, because we are about to plunge headfirst into the enigmatic correlation between the name 'Killian' and the votes garnered by Libertarian presidential candidates in the quirky realm of Maryland politics.
Prepare yourself for a delightfully unconventional ride through the intersection of nomenclature and political preferences. Get ready to unravel the mystery of how a name can stealthily exert its influence on ballots and manifest as a significant statistical association. And above all, get ready to embrace the whimsical and weird as we navigate the unexpected intricacies of our offbeat investigation. After all, in the world of research, sometimes the most outlandish connections yield the most captivating insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "The Influence of Name Popularity on Political Behavior," Smith et al. discuss the unexpected correlation between the frequency of certain first names and voters' political leanings. Their study delves into the psychological and sociological implications of name popularity and its potential impact on electoral outcomes. Similarly, Doe and Jones, in "Namesake Politics: Uncovering the Unusual Links Between Nomenclature and Voting Patterns," examine the curious relationship between individuals' names and their political affiliations, shedding light on the intriguing dynamics at play.

Moving on from serious academia to the more whimsical side of this research, we insert the rather unconventional yet enlightening findings of "The Peculiar Nature of Names and Votes" by Lorem et al. This exploratory study takes a lighthearted approach to the intersection of nomenclature and electoral dynamics, uncovering surprising correlations between specific first names and political preferences. Additionally, Ipsum and Dolor, in "The Influence of Quirky Names on Electoral Outcomes," provide a humorous yet insightful analysis of the impact of unconventional names on voting tendencies, shedding light on the quirky side of political behavior.

Turning to the realm of fiction, we find parallels in the works of Jane Austen's "Pride and Prejudice," where characters' names are intertwined with their personalities and social standing. Similarly, George Orwell's "1984" explores the significance of names and their manipulation in relation to power dynamics, albeit in a dystopian context. These fictional narratives echo the underlying theme of our investigation, highlighting the subtle ways in which names can influence human behavior and societal interactions.

Furthermore, the internet meme "Weird Name Effect" humorously captures the essence of our research, showcasing the comical implications of unconventional names on individuals' perceptions and experiences. This meme aptly reflects the quirky and unexpected nature of our investigation, drawing attention to the fascinating interplay between names, identity, and human behavior.

In summary, the literature presents a diverse array of perspectives on the connection between name popularity and political preferences, ranging from serious academic inquiries to lighthearted explorations and fictional narratives. As we venture forth in our analysis, we will draw upon these varied insights to unravel the peculiar correlation between the first name 'Killian' and the votes garnered by Libertarian presidential candidates in the state of Maryland.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Killian and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1982 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Libertarianism and the Name Game: Analyzing the Impact of 'Killian' on Maryland Presidential Votes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we not only crunch numbers, but also tackle the whimsical and weird world of name popularity and political preferences. We dive deep into the data with a lighthearted touch to explore the surprising correlation between the frequency of the name 'Killian' and the votes received by Libertarian presidential candidates in the state of Maryland. As researchers, we aim to bring both statistical rigor and a sense of humor to our investigation. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9205674 and a p-value less than 0.01, spanning from 1982 to 2020. Join us on this wild journey as we unravel the quirks and curiosities of the intersection between names, politics, and human behavior. After all, who knew that a name could wield such influence over the political game?

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Welcome to the zany world of political research, where we dig deep into the wacky and whimsical to uncover unexpected connections between human behavior and seemingly unrelated variables. In this paper, we boldly venture into the uncharted territory of name popularity and its unlikely association with political leanings. Buckle up, because we are about to embark on a thrilling and unpredictable journey through the statistical realm of 'Killian' namesakes and their impact on Libertarian presidential votes in the state of Maryland.
As intrepid researchers, we don our lab coats and unleash our wit to explore this fascinating phenomenon. After all, who wouldn't be intrigued by the sheer oddity of a name covertly wielding influence over the unfolding drama of political elections? It's like a quirky subplot in the grand saga of statistics and human behavior, where the protagonist is a seemingly innocent name with the ominous potential to sway electoral outcomes.
We embark on this quest armed with an arsenal of statistical tools, a hearty dose of curiosity, and, of course, an appreciation for the absurdities that often lurk within scientific inquiries. Because, let's face it, what's the fun in research if we can't sprinkle in a few puns and unexpected twists along the way? So, grab your pocket protector and strap on your thinking cap, because we are about to plunge headfirst into the enigmatic correlation between the name 'Killian' and the votes garnered by Libertarian presidential candidates in the quirky realm of Maryland politics.
Prepare yourself for a delightfully unconventional ride through the intersection of nomenclature and political preferences. Get ready to unravel the mystery of how a name can stealthily exert its influence on ballots and manifest as a significant statistical association. And above all, get ready to embrace the whimsical and weird as we navigate the unexpected intricacies of our offbeat investigation. After all, in the world of research, sometimes the most outlandish connections yield the most captivating insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the eccentric enigma of the 'Killian' name game and its peculiar entanglement with Libertarian presidential votes in Maryland, we embarked on a madcap journey through the wild and woolly world of research methodologies. Our investigation spanned from 1982 to 2020, encompassing an era rich with both data and drollery. So, how did we navigate this marshy terrain of statistics and nomenclature? Hold onto your propeller hats, because we're about to dive deep into the zany approach we took to disentangle this captivating conundrum.

First, we scoured the vast expanse of the internet, sifting through mounds of data with the determination of zealous data miners. Our trusty companions in this relentless pursuit were none other than the US Social Security Administration and the esteemed guardians of electoral information at MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. With these treasure troves of numerical nuggets at our disposal, we fearlessly plunged headlong into the fray, armed with spreadsheets and a whimsical sense of wonder.

Our first order of business was to extract the frequency of the first name 'Killian' from the hallowed annals of the US Social Security Administration, spanning the years from 1982 to 2020. With meticulous precision, we collected the number of newborns christened with the illustrious name each year, reveling in the kaleidoscope of peculiar trends that unfolded before our very eyes. We then harnessed the power of MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to unveil the votes received by Libertarian presidential candidates in the state of Maryland for the same period, meticulously dotting our i's and crossing our t's to ensure the integrity of our data.

Next, we unleashed the formidable beast known as correlation analysis, employing this statistical juggernaut to scrutinize the relationship between the frequency of the name 'Killian' and the votes garnered by Libertarian presidential candidates in Maryland. With bated breath and an unyielding determination to unravel this mystical connection, we calculated a hearty Pearson correlation coefficient and a p-value that would make even the most hardened statistician crack a wry smile. Our foray into the whimsical world of statistical associations yielded a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9205674 and a p-value less than 0.01, casting light on the unexpected bond between nomenclature and political preferences.

To ensure the robustness of our findings, we also made use of time series analysis to explore the temporal dynamics of this curious relationship. We embarked on an exhilarating expedition through the temporal expanse, slicing and dicing the data with the finesse of culinary maestros, all with the singular goal of illuminating the nuanced patterns hidden beneath the surface. Armed with our trusty statistical tools, we unearthed intriguing temporal trends that added an extra layer of depth to our investigation, showcasing the ebb and flow of 'Killian' name popularity and its whimsical sway over Libertarian votes in the perplexing realm of Maryland politics.

In the spirit of empirical rigor and mirth, our methodology embodies the inquisitive and whimsical ethos that define our quest. Our journey through the labyrinthine landscape of statistical whimsy has uncovered a correlation that transcends the ordinary and flirts with the extraordinary. So, there you have it, the wild and wacky journey that fueled our exploration of the 'Killian' name game and its unlikely tango with Libertarian presidential votes in the unassuming enclave of Maryland. Who knew that a name could harbor such potent sway in the tumultuous dance of politics? But such is the capricious nature of research, where the unexpected and the outlandish often conspire to yield the most captivating revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Killian and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 1982 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9205674, r-squared of 0.8474444, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Libertarianism and the Name Game: Analyzing the Impact of 'Killian' on Maryland Presidential Votes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we not only crunch numbers, but also tackle the whimsical and weird world of name popularity and political preferences. We dive deep into the data with a lighthearted touch to explore the surprising correlation between the frequency of the name 'Killian' and the votes received by Libertarian presidential candidates in the state of Maryland. As researchers, we aim to bring both statistical rigor and a sense of humor to our investigation. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9205674 and a p-value less than 0.01, spanning from 1982 to 2020. Join us on this wild journey as we unravel the quirks and curiosities of the intersection between names, politics, and human behavior. After all, who knew that a name could wield such influence over the political game?

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Welcome to the zany world of political research, where we dig deep into the wacky and whimsical to uncover unexpected connections between human behavior and seemingly unrelated variables. In this paper, we boldly venture into the uncharted territory of name popularity and its unlikely association with political leanings. Buckle up, because we are about to embark on a thrilling and unpredictable journey through the statistical realm of 'Killian' namesakes and their impact on Libertarian presidential votes in the state of Maryland.
As intrepid researchers, we don our lab coats and unleash our wit to explore this fascinating phenomenon. After all, who wouldn't be intrigued by the sheer oddity of a name covertly wielding influence over the unfolding drama of political elections? It's like a quirky subplot in the grand saga of statistics and human behavior, where the protagonist is a seemingly innocent name with the ominous potential to sway electoral outcomes.
We embark on this quest armed with an arsenal of statistical tools, a hearty dose of curiosity, and, of course, an appreciation for the absurdities that often lurk within scientific inquiries. Because, let's face it, what's the fun in research if we can't sprinkle in a few puns and unexpected twists along the way? So, grab your pocket protector and strap on your thinking cap, because we are about to plunge headfirst into the enigmatic correlation between the name 'Killian' and the votes garnered by Libertarian presidential candidates in the quirky realm of Maryland politics.
Prepare yourself for a delightfully unconventional ride through the intersection of nomenclature and political preferences. Get ready to unravel the mystery of how a name can stealthily exert its influence on ballots and manifest as a significant statistical association. And above all, get ready to embrace the whimsical and weird as we navigate the unexpected intricacies of our offbeat investigation. After all, in the world of research, sometimes the most outlandish connections yield the most captivating insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In our extensive foray into the mystical world of data analysis, we uncovered an intriguing connection between the frequency of the name 'Killian' and the votes received by Libertarian presidential candidates in the state of Maryland from 1982 to 2020. Our statistical analysis revealed a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9205674, an r-squared value of 0.8474444, and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables.

Ah, the power of a name! Who would have thought that the moniker 'Killian' could wield such influence over political preferences in the Free State? It's like the name possesses its own brand of political charisma, quietly whispering sweet nothings to voters and subtly swaying their ballots in the direction of libertarian ideals.

But don't just take our word for it – behold the awe-inspiring scatterplot in Fig. 1, which visually encapsulates the robust correlation between the popularity of the name 'Killian' and the votes garnered by Libertarian presidential candidates in Maryland. You can practically see the name's subtle gravitational pull on the political landscape, tugging at the heartstrings of voters and leaving a trail of statistical significance in its wake.

Our findings open the door to a realm of possibilities, defying the conventional boundaries of political analysis and delving into the whimsical and weird. As researchers, we always strive to embrace the quirks and curiosities that emerge from our statistical escapades, and this investigation is no exception. So, take a moment to revel in the absurdity of it all, because in the realm of research, sometimes the most unexpected connections lead to the most captivating revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Killian and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Libertarianism and the Name Game: Analyzing the Impact of 'Killian' on Maryland Presidential Votes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we not only crunch numbers, but also tackle the whimsical and weird world of name popularity and political preferences. We dive deep into the data with a lighthearted touch to explore the surprising correlation between the frequency of the name 'Killian' and the votes received by Libertarian presidential candidates in the state of Maryland. As researchers, we aim to bring both statistical rigor and a sense of humor to our investigation. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9205674 and a p-value less than 0.01, spanning from 1982 to 2020. Join us on this wild journey as we unravel the quirks and curiosities of the intersection between names, politics, and human behavior. After all, who knew that a name could wield such influence over the political game?

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Influence of Name Popularity on Political Behavior," Smith et al. discuss the unexpected correlation between the frequency of certain first names and voters' political leanings. Their study delves into the psychological and sociological implications of name popularity and its potential impact on electoral outcomes. Similarly, Doe and Jones, in "Namesake Politics: Uncovering the Unusual Links Between Nomenclature and Voting Patterns," examine the curious relationship between individuals' names and their political affiliations, shedding light on the intriguing dynamics at play.
Moving on from serious academia to the more whimsical side of this research, we insert the rather unconventional yet enlightening findings of "The Peculiar Nature of Names and Votes" by Lorem et al. This exploratory study takes a lighthearted approach to the intersection of nomenclature and electoral dynamics, uncovering surprising correlations between specific first names and political preferences. Additionally, Ipsum and Dolor, in "The Influence of Quirky Names on Electoral Outcomes," provide a humorous yet insightful analysis of the impact of unconventional names on voting tendencies, shedding light on the quirky side of political behavior.
Turning to the realm of fiction, we find parallels in the works of Jane Austen's "Pride and Prejudice," where characters' names are intertwined with their personalities and social standing. Similarly, George Orwell's "1984" explores the significance of names and their manipulation in relation to power dynamics, albeit in a dystopian context. These fictional narratives echo the underlying theme of our investigation, highlighting the subtle ways in which names can influence human behavior and societal interactions.
Furthermore, the internet meme "Weird Name Effect" humorously captures the essence of our research, showcasing the comical implications of unconventional names on individuals' perceptions and experiences. This meme aptly reflects the quirky and unexpected nature of our investigation, drawing attention to the fascinating interplay between names, identity, and human behavior.
In summary, the literature presents a diverse array of perspectives on the connection between name popularity and political preferences, ranging from serious academic inquiries to lighthearted explorations and fictional narratives. As we venture forth in our analysis, we will draw upon these varied insights to unravel the peculiar correlation between the first name 'Killian' and the votes garnered by Libertarian presidential candidates in the state of Maryland.

[[RESULTS]]
In our extensive foray into the mystical world of data analysis, we uncovered an intriguing connection between the frequency of the name 'Killian' and the votes received by Libertarian presidential candidates in the state of Maryland from 1982 to 2020. Our statistical analysis revealed a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9205674, an r-squared value of 0.8474444, and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables.
Ah, the power of a name! Who would have thought that the moniker 'Killian' could wield such influence over political preferences in the Free State? It's like the name possesses its own brand of political charisma, quietly whispering sweet nothings to voters and subtly swaying their ballots in the direction of libertarian ideals.
But don't just take our word for it – behold the awe-inspiring scatterplot in Fig. 1, which visually encapsulates the robust correlation between the popularity of the name 'Killian' and the votes garnered by Libertarian presidential candidates in Maryland. You can practically see the name's subtle gravitational pull on the political landscape, tugging at the heartstrings of voters and leaving a trail of statistical significance in its wake.
Our findings open the door to a realm of possibilities, defying the conventional boundaries of political analysis and delving into the whimsical and weird. As researchers, we always strive to embrace the quirks and curiosities that emerge from our statistical escapades, and this investigation is no exception. So, take a moment to revel in the absurdity of it all, because in the realm of research, sometimes the most unexpected connections lead to the most captivating revelations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our research remarkably echo the prior studies on the influence of name popularity on political behavior. Smith et al.'s investigation into the sway of certain first names on voters' political leanings certainly laid the groundwork for our own whimsical exploration. Who could have imagined that the frequency of a name could hold such sway over political preferences? It's like uncovering a secret superpower hidden within a seemingly ordinary moniker.

Moreover, the unconventional yet enlightening insights of Lorem et al.'s "The Peculiar Nature of Names and Votes" provide a lighthearted approach to our shared quest, emphasizing the unexpected correlations between specific names and political predilections. Their study, although delving into the more unconventional side of research, aligns quite closely with our own journey down the rabbit hole of quirky nomenclature's influence on electoral dynamics. In the realm of research, sometimes the most unconventional correlations lead to the most captivating revelations!

And let's not forget the literary parallels found in Jane Austen's "Pride and Prejudice" and George Orwell's "1984," where the peculiar nature of names and their underlying influence on human behavior is subtly expounded upon. These fictitious narratives authentically mirror the core theme of our investigation, unveiling the subtle ways in which names can weave themselves into the intricate fabric of societal interactions and political proclivities.

Our research delves headfirst into the peculiar and unexpected, shedding light on the mystical correlation between the first name 'Killian' and the votes garnered by Libertarian presidential candidates in the state of Maryland. It's like uncovering a hidden treasure trove of statistical significance nestled within the whimsical world of nomenclature. In the realm of research, it's these unexpected connections that truly capture the imagination and fuel the quest for further discovery.

As we wrap our heads around the influence of 'Killian,' it's plain to see that names truly pack a punch when it comes to political sway. And as researchers, we can't help but revel in the absurdity of it all as we unravel the quirks and curiosities that arise from our statistical escapades. Who knew that a name could hold such power and sway over the political game? Well, now we do – and the name 'Killian' has certainly left its indelible mark on the political landscape of Maryland.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Killian and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Libertarianism and the Name Game: Analyzing the Impact of 'Killian' on Maryland Presidential Votes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we not only crunch numbers, but also tackle the whimsical and weird world of name popularity and political preferences. We dive deep into the data with a lighthearted touch to explore the surprising correlation between the frequency of the name 'Killian' and the votes received by Libertarian presidential candidates in the state of Maryland. As researchers, we aim to bring both statistical rigor and a sense of humor to our investigation. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9205674 and a p-value less than 0.01, spanning from 1982 to 2020. Join us on this wild journey as we unravel the quirks and curiosities of the intersection between names, politics, and human behavior. After all, who knew that a name could wield such influence over the political game?

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Welcome to the zany world of political research, where we dig deep into the wacky and whimsical to uncover unexpected connections between human behavior and seemingly unrelated variables. In this paper, we boldly venture into the uncharted territory of name popularity and its unlikely association with political leanings. Buckle up, because we are about to embark on a thrilling and unpredictable journey through the statistical realm of 'Killian' namesakes and their impact on Libertarian presidential votes in the state of Maryland.
As intrepid researchers, we don our lab coats and unleash our wit to explore this fascinating phenomenon. After all, who wouldn't be intrigued by the sheer oddity of a name covertly wielding influence over the unfolding drama of political elections? It's like a quirky subplot in the grand saga of statistics and human behavior, where the protagonist is a seemingly innocent name with the ominous potential to sway electoral outcomes.
We embark on this quest armed with an arsenal of statistical tools, a hearty dose of curiosity, and, of course, an appreciation for the absurdities that often lurk within scientific inquiries. Because, let's face it, what's the fun in research if we can't sprinkle in a few puns and unexpected twists along the way? So, grab your pocket protector and strap on your thinking cap, because we are about to plunge headfirst into the enigmatic correlation between the name 'Killian' and the votes garnered by Libertarian presidential candidates in the quirky realm of Maryland politics.
Prepare yourself for a delightfully unconventional ride through the intersection of nomenclature and political preferences. Get ready to unravel the mystery of how a name can stealthily exert its influence on ballots and manifest as a significant statistical association. And above all, get ready to embrace the whimsical and weird as we navigate the unexpected intricacies of our offbeat investigation. After all, in the world of research, sometimes the most outlandish connections yield the most captivating insights.

[[RESULTS]]
In our extensive foray into the mystical world of data analysis, we uncovered an intriguing connection between the frequency of the name 'Killian' and the votes received by Libertarian presidential candidates in the state of Maryland from 1982 to 2020. Our statistical analysis revealed a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9205674, an r-squared value of 0.8474444, and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables.
Ah, the power of a name! Who would have thought that the moniker 'Killian' could wield such influence over political preferences in the Free State? It's like the name possesses its own brand of political charisma, quietly whispering sweet nothings to voters and subtly swaying their ballots in the direction of libertarian ideals.
But don't just take our word for it – behold the awe-inspiring scatterplot in Fig. 1, which visually encapsulates the robust correlation between the popularity of the name 'Killian' and the votes garnered by Libertarian presidential candidates in Maryland. You can practically see the name's subtle gravitational pull on the political landscape, tugging at the heartstrings of voters and leaving a trail of statistical significance in its wake.
Our findings open the door to a realm of possibilities, defying the conventional boundaries of political analysis and delving into the whimsical and weird. As researchers, we always strive to embrace the quirks and curiosities that emerge from our statistical escapades, and this investigation is no exception. So, take a moment to revel in the absurdity of it all, because in the realm of research, sometimes the most unexpected connections lead to the most captivating revelations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our exploration of the peculiar link between the prevalence of the name 'Killian' and the votes secured by Libertarian presidential candidates in Maryland has left us both astounded and amused. Who would have thought that a seemingly innocuous name could hold such sway over the political tides? It's like the name itself is campaigning for libertarian ideals, subtly whispering its influence into the ears of voters.

Our findings not only illuminate the whimsical and weird but also underscore the capricious nature of statistical correlations. It's as if the universe itself conspires to inject a dose of the absurd into our research endeavors. After all, what's science without a few unexpected twists and turns?

As we reflect on our zany journey through the data, one thing becomes abundantly clear: the 'Killian' effect is no mere statistical anomaly, but rather a delightful oddity that defies the logic of conventional political analysis. The name seems to wield its own unique brand of statistical charisma, captivating the hearts and minds of voters and leaving a trail of significant correlations in its wake.

So, let's raise a toast to the whimsy of statistical peculiarities, for in the realm of research, sometimes the most outlandish connections yield the most enchanting insights. As for future studies, we are confident that no other research endeavor could match the sheer delight and intrigue of our exploration. In the immortal words of Killian-named voters, "We've cast our ballots and our spell – the 'Killian' effect is a statistical marvel that needs no further unraveling!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Libertarianism and the Name Game: Analyzing the Impact of 'Killian' on Maryland Presidential Votes. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Political Namology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Libertarianism and the Name Game: Analyzing the Impact of 'Killian' on Maryland Presidential Votes. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Political Linguistics and Electoral Dynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Libertarianism and the Name Game: Analyzing the Impact of 'Killian' on Maryland Presidential Votes with an abstract of In this paper, we not only crunch numbers, but also tackle the whimsical and weird world of name popularity and political preferences. We dive deep into the data with a lighthearted touch to explore the surprising correlation between the frequency of the name 'Killian' and the votes received by Libertarian presidential candidates in the state of Maryland. As researchers, we aim to bring both statistical rigor and a sense of humor to our investigation. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9205674 and a p-value less than 0.01, spanning from 1982 to 2020. Join us on this wild journey as we unravel the quirks and curiosities of the intersection between names, politics, and human behavior. After all, who knew that a name could wield such influence over the political game?

ChatGPT:

"Libertarian presidential candidates Maryland votes, 'Killian' name impact, name popularity political preferences, correlation between name 'Killian' and votes, statistical rigor investigation, political game influence of name, Maryland presidential votes analysis, whimsical name popularity political preferences correlation"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Killian
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Killian
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Killian

Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland

Correlation r = 0.9205674 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8474444 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Killian) over the 10 years from 1982 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00016. 0.0001581112889569198400000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 0.016% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 6,325 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.69, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1984198819921996200020042008201220162020
Popularity of the first name Killian (Babies born)730931611581662902801400911
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland (Percentage of votes)0.3413740.3936170.2375820.4921750.2621950.2555950.3739941.115312.8621.10266




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7,30,93,161,158,166,290,280,1400,911,])
array_2 = np.array([0.341374,0.393617,0.237582,0.492175,0.262195,0.255595,0.373994,1.11531,2.862,1.10266,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Killian"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Maryland"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are legendary!


Correlation ID: 5534 · Black Variable ID: 3936 · Red Variable ID: 26110
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0