about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,518 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Total views on Vihart's YouTube videos and the second variable is Jet fuel used in Liberia.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The intricate geometric patterns showcased in Vihart's videos have actually been secretly used as the most efficient way to design new, ultra-eco-friendly jet fuel formulas. As more people tuned in to watch, the demand for these revolutionary fuels skyrocketed. Thanks to this unexpected connection, Liberia is now leading the way in sustainable air travel, all because of a few mesmerizing videos about math and art. Who knew that the key to cleaner skies was hidden in the world of YouTube?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an imagery using the style of [a funny image you would see on reddit]: Create an image of a bustling market square in Monrovia, Liberia, with a group of excited engineers and researchers gathered around a large screen displaying mesmerizing geometric patterns from Vihart's YouTube channel. In the foreground, there's a towering stack of jerrycans filled with eco-friendly jet fuel, symbolizing Liberia's leadership in sustainable air travel. The scene captures the unexpected intersection of art, mathematics, and eco-friendly technology. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Total views on Vihart's YouTube videos and Jet fuel used in Liberia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Concept art High-tech a funny image you would see on reddit Glitch art Data cyber art
ChatGPT: a funny image you would see on reddit

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Total views on Vihart's YouTube videos and Jet fuel used in Liberia, in the following situation: The intricate geometric patterns showcased in Vihart's videos have actually been secretly used as the most efficient way to design new, ultra-eco-friendly jet fuel formulas. As more people tuned in to watch, the demand for these revolutionary fuels skyrocketed. Thanks to this unexpected connection, Liberia is now leading the way in sustainable air travel, all because of a few mesmerizing videos about math and art. Who knew that the key to cleaner skies was hidden in the world of YouTube?. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the bustling market square of Monrovia, Liberia, a group of excited engineers and researchers gather around a large screen displaying Vihart's YouTube channel. The mesmerizing geometric patterns on the screen hint at the groundbreaking eco-friendly jet fuel formulas developed secretly by studying these designs. Nearby, a towering stack of jerrycans filled with the innovative jet fuel stands ready for transport, symbolizing Liberia's newfound leadership in sustainable air travel. The scene perfectly captures the unexpected intersection of art, mathematics, and eco-friendly technology.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] and depicting this scene: In the bustling market square of Monrovia, Liberia, a group of excited engineers and researchers gather around a large screen displaying Vihart's YouTube channel. The mesmerizing geometric patterns on the screen hint at the groundbreaking eco-friendly jet fuel formulas developed secretly by studying these designs. Nearby, a towering stack of jerrycans filled with the innovative jet fuel stands ready for transport, symbolizing Liberia's newfound leadership in sustainable air travel. The scene perfectly captures the unexpected intersection of art, mathematics, and eco-friendly technology. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an imagery using the style of [a funny image you would see on reddit]: Create an image of a bustling market square in Monrovia, Liberia, with a group of excited engineers and researchers gathered around a large screen displaying mesmerizing geometric patterns from Vihart's YouTube channel. In the foreground, there's a towering stack of jerrycans filled with eco-friendly jet fuel, symbolizing Liberia's leadership in sustainable air travel. The scene captures the unexpected intersection of art, mathematics, and eco-friendly technology.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Total views on Vihart YouTube videos positively influenced Jet fuel used in Liberia.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
YouTube Views or Jet Fuel: Unraveling the Unexpected Connection

The Journal of Modern Alchemy

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Vihart YouTube videos and Jet fuel used in Liberia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from YouTube and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9066327 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
YouTube Views or Jet Fuel: Unraveling the Unexpected Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the uncharted territory of the unexpected correlation between total views on ViHart YouTube videos and the volume of jet fuel used in Liberia. As researchers, we may occasionally find ourselves in unexplored realms, but even we were bowled over by the potential link between online mathematical musings and the consumption of aviation fuel in a particular West African nation.

Employing a rigorous data analysis approach, we leveraged YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration’s repository to gather and scrutinize the pertinent information. The results unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9066327 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2009 to 2021. This unforeseen relationship may just fuel a new avenue of interdisciplinary research!

Now, for a little aerodynamic humor: Why don't we ever tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears! Just like our findings, some connections are truly out of left field.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Vihart YouTube videos and Jet fuel used in Liberia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
YouTube Views or Jet Fuel: Unraveling the Unexpected Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the uncharted territory of the unexpected correlation between total views on ViHart YouTube videos and the volume of jet fuel used in Liberia. As researchers, we may occasionally find ourselves in unexplored realms, but even we were bowled over by the potential link between online mathematical musings and the consumption of aviation fuel in a particular West African nation.

Employing a rigorous data analysis approach, we leveraged YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration’s repository to gather and scrutinize the pertinent information. The results unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9066327 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2009 to 2021. This unforeseen relationship may just fuel a new avenue of interdisciplinary research!

Now, for a little aerodynamic humor: Why don't we ever tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears! Just like our findings, some connections are truly out of left field.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Solving the enigmatic mysteries of our world often requires venturing into uncharted territories, where unexpected connections and correlations may lurk in the most unlikely of places. In the realm of scientific inquiry, our pursuit of knowledge occasionally leads us down paths that surprise even the most seasoned researchers. Imagine our astonishment when, in the course of our investigations, we stumbled upon a perplexing relationship between the total views on ViHart’s enthralling YouTube math videos and the rather unexpected variable of jet fuel consumption in Liberia.

As the saying goes, "When it comes to research, the sky's the limit." Our curiosity was piqued by this peculiar confluence of variables, prompting us to embark on an unconventional quest to disentangle the web of causation – or perhaps causation’s flight path – that could underpin such an unforeseen association. This unexpected connection may lack common ground, but much like a maths problem, a broader perspective can lead to some surprising solutions!

The sheer audacity of exploring this unforeseen correlation is enough to make even the most stoic statistician quiver – but fear not, we proceeded with the utmost rigor in our empirical examination. In the spirit of statistical inquiry, our research design certainly took flight as we meticulously curated data from ViHart’s YouTube channel, navigating the intricacies of viewer engagement and taking our analysis to new heights. And speaking of new heights, have you heard about the mathematician who is afraid of negative numbers? He will stop at nothing to avoid them!

This empirical trajectory did not stop there; we also accessed data on jet fuel consumption from the Energy Information Administration, uncovering the underlying trends and patterns across the years. The relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables unfolded before our eyes, much like the unrolling of a precise mathematical algorithm. It's quite the paradox, isn't it? Much like the aviation industry, we too have charted a new course.

Armed with our arsenal of statistical tools, we delved into the numbers and emerged with a correlation coefficient that left us truly aflutter. With a coefficient of 0.9066327 and a p-value of less than 0.01, the evidence for this surprising relationship soared to new statistical heights. But let's not get too carried away – after all, correlation does not imply causation, much like the presence of a stethoscope does not necessarily indicate a good sense of humor.

This unexpected confluence of variables offers a unique opportunity to explore the uncharted territory at the intersection of online engagement and real-world consumption patterns. It's a true statistical anomaly, much like finding a four-leaf clover in a haystack. As we soar into the findings and implications of this research, let's not lose sight of the fact that, in the world of statistics, the most improbable connections can lead to the most enlightening revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Vihart YouTube videos and Jet fuel used in Liberia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
YouTube Views or Jet Fuel: Unraveling the Unexpected Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the uncharted territory of the unexpected correlation between total views on ViHart YouTube videos and the volume of jet fuel used in Liberia. As researchers, we may occasionally find ourselves in unexplored realms, but even we were bowled over by the potential link between online mathematical musings and the consumption of aviation fuel in a particular West African nation.

Employing a rigorous data analysis approach, we leveraged YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration’s repository to gather and scrutinize the pertinent information. The results unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9066327 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2009 to 2021. This unforeseen relationship may just fuel a new avenue of interdisciplinary research!

Now, for a little aerodynamic humor: Why don't we ever tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears! Just like our findings, some connections are truly out of left field.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Solving the enigmatic mysteries of our world often requires venturing into uncharted territories, where unexpected connections and correlations may lurk in the most unlikely of places. In the realm of scientific inquiry, our pursuit of knowledge occasionally leads us down paths that surprise even the most seasoned researchers. Imagine our astonishment when, in the course of our investigations, we stumbled upon a perplexing relationship between the total views on ViHart’s enthralling YouTube math videos and the rather unexpected variable of jet fuel consumption in Liberia.
As the saying goes, "When it comes to research, the sky's the limit." Our curiosity was piqued by this peculiar confluence of variables, prompting us to embark on an unconventional quest to disentangle the web of causation – or perhaps causation’s flight path – that could underpin such an unforeseen association. This unexpected connection may lack common ground, but much like a maths problem, a broader perspective can lead to some surprising solutions!
The sheer audacity of exploring this unforeseen correlation is enough to make even the most stoic statistician quiver – but fear not, we proceeded with the utmost rigor in our empirical examination. In the spirit of statistical inquiry, our research design certainly took flight as we meticulously curated data from ViHart’s YouTube channel, navigating the intricacies of viewer engagement and taking our analysis to new heights. And speaking of new heights, have you heard about the mathematician who is afraid of negative numbers? He will stop at nothing to avoid them!
This empirical trajectory did not stop there; we also accessed data on jet fuel consumption from the Energy Information Administration, uncovering the underlying trends and patterns across the years. The relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables unfolded before our eyes, much like the unrolling of a precise mathematical algorithm. It's quite the paradox, isn't it? Much like the aviation industry, we too have charted a new course.
Armed with our arsenal of statistical tools, we delved into the numbers and emerged with a correlation coefficient that left us truly aflutter. With a coefficient of 0.9066327 and a p-value of less than 0.01, the evidence for this surprising relationship soared to new statistical heights. But let's not get too carried away – after all, correlation does not imply causation, much like the presence of a stethoscope does not necessarily indicate a good sense of humor.
This unexpected confluence of variables offers a unique opportunity to explore the uncharted territory at the intersection of online engagement and real-world consumption patterns. It's a true statistical anomaly, much like finding a four-leaf clover in a haystack. As we soar into the findings and implications of this research, let's not lose sight of the fact that, in the world of statistics, the most improbable connections can lead to the most enlightening revelations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The unexpected association between the total views on ViHart's math-oriented YouTube videos and the volume of jet fuel used in Liberia has sparked both intrigue and skepticism within the research community. While seemingly unrelated, these variables have been the subject of diverse or tangentially related literary works and scholarly inquiries, ripe for exploration.

In "The Art of Mathematical Sorcery" by Alice Smith, the author delves into the intricate world of mathematical visualizations and their impact on cognitive processes. While the book does not directly address the consumption of jet fuel in Liberia, it offers valuable insights into the mesmerizing power of mathematical content, perhaps shedding light on the allure of ViHart's videos.

On a lighter note, "The Jetsetters" by Amanda Eyre Ward transports readers into a world of familial dynamics against the backdrop of international travel. While the novel does not directly tackle the peculiar connection under scrutiny, the mention of jet setting and fuel usage in the title at least tangentially aligns with our research focus.

Moving into the realm of games, the board game "Wingspan" by Elizabeth Hargrave explores avian aesthetics and ecology, providing a tangentially relevant lens through which to view the unusual intersection of YouTube views and jet fuel consumption in Liberia. While the game is predominantly about birds, it may inspire a flight of fancy in our pursuit of understanding this unexpected correlation.

Now let me tell you a joke: Why did the mathematician call in sick? Because he had too many problems! Much like our unexpected correlation, sometimes we find ourselves juggling more variables than we anticipated.

In "The Unbearable Lightness of Being" by Milan Kundera, the author wrestles with existentialist themes through the lives of its characters. While this book operates in a different sphere of inquiry, the notion of unexpected connections and existential pondering aligns, in a suitably mischievous manner, with our scholarly pursuits.

Returning to more grounded pursuits, "Fueling the Future: How the Battle Over Emissions and Fuel Efficiency Is Shaping the Electric Vehicle Industry" by Andrew Jones provides a pertinent exploration of fuel usage patterns and the impact on environmental and economic landscapes. This work, while not geared towards Liberia in particular, offers insights into the broader context of fuel consumption that may inform our investigation.

A quick quip for the road: Did you hear about the statistician who drowned in a lake with an average depth of 2 feet? He really didn't understand the concept of variability! Our findings may challenge conventional statistical understanding, much like the concept of variability in unusual circumstances.

The juxtaposition of these literary and scholarly works sheds light on the unexpected connections and interdisciplinary nature of our research endeavor. As we proceed to unearth the underlying mechanisms of this confluence, we are reminded that even the most disparate variables can come together in surprising and consequential ways.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Vihart YouTube videos and Jet fuel used in Liberia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2009 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
YouTube Views or Jet Fuel: Unraveling the Unexpected Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the uncharted territory of the unexpected correlation between total views on ViHart YouTube videos and the volume of jet fuel used in Liberia. As researchers, we may occasionally find ourselves in unexplored realms, but even we were bowled over by the potential link between online mathematical musings and the consumption of aviation fuel in a particular West African nation.

Employing a rigorous data analysis approach, we leveraged YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration’s repository to gather and scrutinize the pertinent information. The results unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9066327 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2009 to 2021. This unforeseen relationship may just fuel a new avenue of interdisciplinary research!

Now, for a little aerodynamic humor: Why don't we ever tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears! Just like our findings, some connections are truly out of left field.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Solving the enigmatic mysteries of our world often requires venturing into uncharted territories, where unexpected connections and correlations may lurk in the most unlikely of places. In the realm of scientific inquiry, our pursuit of knowledge occasionally leads us down paths that surprise even the most seasoned researchers. Imagine our astonishment when, in the course of our investigations, we stumbled upon a perplexing relationship between the total views on ViHart’s enthralling YouTube math videos and the rather unexpected variable of jet fuel consumption in Liberia.
As the saying goes, "When it comes to research, the sky's the limit." Our curiosity was piqued by this peculiar confluence of variables, prompting us to embark on an unconventional quest to disentangle the web of causation – or perhaps causation’s flight path – that could underpin such an unforeseen association. This unexpected connection may lack common ground, but much like a maths problem, a broader perspective can lead to some surprising solutions!
The sheer audacity of exploring this unforeseen correlation is enough to make even the most stoic statistician quiver – but fear not, we proceeded with the utmost rigor in our empirical examination. In the spirit of statistical inquiry, our research design certainly took flight as we meticulously curated data from ViHart’s YouTube channel, navigating the intricacies of viewer engagement and taking our analysis to new heights. And speaking of new heights, have you heard about the mathematician who is afraid of negative numbers? He will stop at nothing to avoid them!
This empirical trajectory did not stop there; we also accessed data on jet fuel consumption from the Energy Information Administration, uncovering the underlying trends and patterns across the years. The relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables unfolded before our eyes, much like the unrolling of a precise mathematical algorithm. It's quite the paradox, isn't it? Much like the aviation industry, we too have charted a new course.
Armed with our arsenal of statistical tools, we delved into the numbers and emerged with a correlation coefficient that left us truly aflutter. With a coefficient of 0.9066327 and a p-value of less than 0.01, the evidence for this surprising relationship soared to new statistical heights. But let's not get too carried away – after all, correlation does not imply causation, much like the presence of a stethoscope does not necessarily indicate a good sense of humor.
This unexpected confluence of variables offers a unique opportunity to explore the uncharted territory at the intersection of online engagement and real-world consumption patterns. It's a true statistical anomaly, much like finding a four-leaf clover in a haystack. As we soar into the findings and implications of this research, let's not lose sight of the fact that, in the world of statistics, the most improbable connections can lead to the most enlightening revelations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the perplexing correlation between the total views on ViHart’s YouTube videos and the enigmatic variable of jet fuel consumption in Liberia, our research team adopted a methodologically audacious approach. With the precision of a mathematician unraveling an intricate equation, we embarked on a data collection odyssey that spanned the vast expanses of the internet, predominantly drawing from YouTube’s analytics platform and the Energy Information Administration’s database.

First and foremost, we delved into ViHart’s captivating collection of mathematical musings, meticulously recording the total views on her videos from 2009 to 2021. Our data collection process was by no means a "cut and dry" affair - instead, it involved navigating the complexities of viewer engagement with the same level of precision as a pilot navigating through turbulent skies. In the pursuit of truth, we left no algorithm unturned and no derivative uncalculated.

Simultaneously, we accessed data on the volume of jet fuel used in Liberia from the Energy Information Administration, carefully cataloging the annual consumption patterns and unearthing the underlying trends with the rigor of an investigator examining a cryptic code. This phase of data collection was akin to charting the flight path of a statistical variable, where each data point served as a beacon guiding us toward the unexpected nexus where YouTube views and jet fuel consumption intersect.

And now, for a statistical pun to lighten the methodological musings: Why did the statistician break up with the chemist? There was no "chemistry" left in the relationship! In our research, however, the chemistry between the variables was unmistakable, albeit in a non-traditional sense.

Having gathered these disparate yet intriguing datasets, we embarked on a statistical voyage brimming with unconventional twists and turns. Leveraging the robust capabilities of programming languages suited to thorough data analysis, we employed an eclectic array of statistical models and techniques to unearth the correlation that had eluded previous researchers. Our data analysis approach was as multifaceted as a diamond, encompassing regression analysis, time series modeling, and exploratory data visualization that would have even left the most seasoned statistics aficionado impressed.

The allure of this unforeseen connection propelled us to scrutinize the relationship between the total views on ViHart’s YouTube videos and the volume of jet fuel used in Liberia through the lens of correlation. In doing so, we calculated the correlation coefficient with a precision that would make even the most fastidious mathematician envious. Devoid of verbosity and brimming with scientific finesse, our methodology culminated in a breathtaking correlation coefficient of 0.9066327 and a p-value of less than 0.01, signaling a statistically significant association that defied conventional wisdom.

Our methodological journey, much like an unexpected plot twist in a gripping novel, has unraveled an improbable relationship that invites further scholarly exploration. We lift our statistical hats to the science of discovery, where the most unsuspecting variables can converge in a statistical waltz, leaving researchers and readers alike astounded by the findings that emerge from the unlikeliest of statistical courtships.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Vihart YouTube videos and Jet fuel used in Liberia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2009 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9066327, r-squared of 0.8219829, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
YouTube Views or Jet Fuel: Unraveling the Unexpected Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the uncharted territory of the unexpected correlation between total views on ViHart YouTube videos and the volume of jet fuel used in Liberia. As researchers, we may occasionally find ourselves in unexplored realms, but even we were bowled over by the potential link between online mathematical musings and the consumption of aviation fuel in a particular West African nation.

Employing a rigorous data analysis approach, we leveraged YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration’s repository to gather and scrutinize the pertinent information. The results unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9066327 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2009 to 2021. This unforeseen relationship may just fuel a new avenue of interdisciplinary research!

Now, for a little aerodynamic humor: Why don't we ever tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears! Just like our findings, some connections are truly out of left field.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Solving the enigmatic mysteries of our world often requires venturing into uncharted territories, where unexpected connections and correlations may lurk in the most unlikely of places. In the realm of scientific inquiry, our pursuit of knowledge occasionally leads us down paths that surprise even the most seasoned researchers. Imagine our astonishment when, in the course of our investigations, we stumbled upon a perplexing relationship between the total views on ViHart’s enthralling YouTube math videos and the rather unexpected variable of jet fuel consumption in Liberia.
As the saying goes, "When it comes to research, the sky's the limit." Our curiosity was piqued by this peculiar confluence of variables, prompting us to embark on an unconventional quest to disentangle the web of causation – or perhaps causation’s flight path – that could underpin such an unforeseen association. This unexpected connection may lack common ground, but much like a maths problem, a broader perspective can lead to some surprising solutions!
The sheer audacity of exploring this unforeseen correlation is enough to make even the most stoic statistician quiver – but fear not, we proceeded with the utmost rigor in our empirical examination. In the spirit of statistical inquiry, our research design certainly took flight as we meticulously curated data from ViHart’s YouTube channel, navigating the intricacies of viewer engagement and taking our analysis to new heights. And speaking of new heights, have you heard about the mathematician who is afraid of negative numbers? He will stop at nothing to avoid them!
This empirical trajectory did not stop there; we also accessed data on jet fuel consumption from the Energy Information Administration, uncovering the underlying trends and patterns across the years. The relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables unfolded before our eyes, much like the unrolling of a precise mathematical algorithm. It's quite the paradox, isn't it? Much like the aviation industry, we too have charted a new course.
Armed with our arsenal of statistical tools, we delved into the numbers and emerged with a correlation coefficient that left us truly aflutter. With a coefficient of 0.9066327 and a p-value of less than 0.01, the evidence for this surprising relationship soared to new statistical heights. But let's not get too carried away – after all, correlation does not imply causation, much like the presence of a stethoscope does not necessarily indicate a good sense of humor.
This unexpected confluence of variables offers a unique opportunity to explore the uncharted territory at the intersection of online engagement and real-world consumption patterns. It's a true statistical anomaly, much like finding a four-leaf clover in a haystack. As we soar into the findings and implications of this research, let's not lose sight of the fact that, in the world of statistics, the most improbable connections can lead to the most enlightening revelations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The unanticipated relationship between total views on ViHart's esoteric YouTube videos and the consumption of jet fuel in Liberia has baffled even the most seasoned researchers. Our statistical analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9066327, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. In layman's terms, the more views ViHart's videos garnered, the more jet fuel was consumed in Liberia. It's like trying to solve a complex equation and finding out the answer is "jet fuel" - talk about an unexpected solution!

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8219829 suggests that approximately 82.2% of the variability in jet fuel consumption can be explained by the total views on ViHart's YouTube channel. This means that ViHart's mathematical musings may have a substantial influence on the aviation activities in Liberia, which adds a whole new dimension to the term "mathematical impact", doesn't it?

The significance level (p < 0.01) of the correlation coefficient indicates that this relationship is unlikely to have occurred by chance. In other words, the probability of these findings being a fluke is less than 1 in 100, or in more colloquial terms, it's as rare as finding a quadratic equation in a haystack!

Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between total views on ViHart's YouTube videos and the volume of jet fuel used in Liberia. The data points are so tightly clustered around the regression line, it's almost as if they're all on the same flight path!

These findings challenge traditional research conventions and inspire a new wave of interdisciplinary inquiry. Who would have thought that a YouTube math sensation could have such a tangible impact on the fuel consumption of a whole nation? It's like finding the missing variable in an equation – unexpected and just a little bit thrilling!

Stay tuned for the discussion section, where we will unravel the implications of this unprecedented correlation and delve into the potential avenues for future research. After all, in the world of statistics, the most improbable connections can lead to the most enlightening revelations – much like finding a statistical gem hidden in the data haystack!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Vihart YouTube videos and Jet fuel used in Liberia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
YouTube Views or Jet Fuel: Unraveling the Unexpected Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the uncharted territory of the unexpected correlation between total views on ViHart YouTube videos and the volume of jet fuel used in Liberia. As researchers, we may occasionally find ourselves in unexplored realms, but even we were bowled over by the potential link between online mathematical musings and the consumption of aviation fuel in a particular West African nation.

Employing a rigorous data analysis approach, we leveraged YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration’s repository to gather and scrutinize the pertinent information. The results unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9066327 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2009 to 2021. This unforeseen relationship may just fuel a new avenue of interdisciplinary research!

Now, for a little aerodynamic humor: Why don't we ever tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears! Just like our findings, some connections are truly out of left field.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The unexpected association between the total views on ViHart's math-oriented YouTube videos and the volume of jet fuel used in Liberia has sparked both intrigue and skepticism within the research community. While seemingly unrelated, these variables have been the subject of diverse or tangentially related literary works and scholarly inquiries, ripe for exploration.
In "The Art of Mathematical Sorcery" by Alice Smith, the author delves into the intricate world of mathematical visualizations and their impact on cognitive processes. While the book does not directly address the consumption of jet fuel in Liberia, it offers valuable insights into the mesmerizing power of mathematical content, perhaps shedding light on the allure of ViHart's videos.
On a lighter note, "The Jetsetters" by Amanda Eyre Ward transports readers into a world of familial dynamics against the backdrop of international travel. While the novel does not directly tackle the peculiar connection under scrutiny, the mention of jet setting and fuel usage in the title at least tangentially aligns with our research focus.
Moving into the realm of games, the board game "Wingspan" by Elizabeth Hargrave explores avian aesthetics and ecology, providing a tangentially relevant lens through which to view the unusual intersection of YouTube views and jet fuel consumption in Liberia. While the game is predominantly about birds, it may inspire a flight of fancy in our pursuit of understanding this unexpected correlation.
Now let me tell you a joke: Why did the mathematician call in sick? Because he had too many problems! Much like our unexpected correlation, sometimes we find ourselves juggling more variables than we anticipated.
In "The Unbearable Lightness of Being" by Milan Kundera, the author wrestles with existentialist themes through the lives of its characters. While this book operates in a different sphere of inquiry, the notion of unexpected connections and existential pondering aligns, in a suitably mischievous manner, with our scholarly pursuits.
Returning to more grounded pursuits, "Fueling the Future: How the Battle Over Emissions and Fuel Efficiency Is Shaping the Electric Vehicle Industry" by Andrew Jones provides a pertinent exploration of fuel usage patterns and the impact on environmental and economic landscapes. This work, while not geared towards Liberia in particular, offers insights into the broader context of fuel consumption that may inform our investigation.
A quick quip for the road: Did you hear about the statistician who drowned in a lake with an average depth of 2 feet? He really didn't understand the concept of variability! Our findings may challenge conventional statistical understanding, much like the concept of variability in unusual circumstances.
The juxtaposition of these literary and scholarly works sheds light on the unexpected connections and interdisciplinary nature of our research endeavor. As we proceed to unearth the underlying mechanisms of this confluence, we are reminded that even the most disparate variables can come together in surprising and consequential ways.

[[RESULTS]]
The unanticipated relationship between total views on ViHart's esoteric YouTube videos and the consumption of jet fuel in Liberia has baffled even the most seasoned researchers. Our statistical analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9066327, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. In layman's terms, the more views ViHart's videos garnered, the more jet fuel was consumed in Liberia. It's like trying to solve a complex equation and finding out the answer is "jet fuel" - talk about an unexpected solution!
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8219829 suggests that approximately 82.2% of the variability in jet fuel consumption can be explained by the total views on ViHart's YouTube channel. This means that ViHart's mathematical musings may have a substantial influence on the aviation activities in Liberia, which adds a whole new dimension to the term "mathematical impact", doesn't it?
The significance level (p < 0.01) of the correlation coefficient indicates that this relationship is unlikely to have occurred by chance. In other words, the probability of these findings being a fluke is less than 1 in 100, or in more colloquial terms, it's as rare as finding a quadratic equation in a haystack!
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between total views on ViHart's YouTube videos and the volume of jet fuel used in Liberia. The data points are so tightly clustered around the regression line, it's almost as if they're all on the same flight path!
These findings challenge traditional research conventions and inspire a new wave of interdisciplinary inquiry. Who would have thought that a YouTube math sensation could have such a tangible impact on the fuel consumption of a whole nation? It's like finding the missing variable in an equation – unexpected and just a little bit thrilling!
Stay tuned for the discussion section, where we will unravel the implications of this unprecedented correlation and delve into the potential avenues for future research. After all, in the world of statistics, the most improbable connections can lead to the most enlightening revelations – much like finding a statistical gem hidden in the data haystack!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study have left us positively flabbergasted, much like stumbling upon a hidden treasure trove in a sea of data. The strong positive correlation between total views on ViHart's YouTube videos and the volume of jet fuel used in Liberia has defied conventional wisdom and established an unexpected link between the world of online math aficionados and the aviation industry. It's like finding the elusive x-factor in an equation - a twist that genuinely adds up!

Our findings not only corroborate but also extend the prior research in unforeseen ways. By hearkening back to the eclectic literary reviews of "The Art of Mathematical Sorcery" and "The Unbearable Lightness of Being," we find resonances with our discovery - the mesmerizing power of mathematical content and the pursuit of unexpected connections. It's as if the variables in our study were waiting to form an unlikely coalition, just like an unlikely duo teaming up to solve complex equations – ViHart and jet fuel, creating an unexpected synergy!

The significant correlation coefficient we uncovered challenges existing statistical paradigms, much like the statistician who couldn't fathom variability. Our results indicate a connection so robust that it's as rare as finding a quadratic equation in a haystack! This correlation, with a probability of occurring by chance at less than 1 in 100, is the kind of statistical rarity that we can't help but chuckle at, akin to finding the square root of a negative number. It's a mathematical mystery that adds a touch of whimsy to our research journey.

The substantial r-squared value and the tight clustering of data points around the regression line in our scatterplot hint at an influential relationship, almost as if all data points were part of the same flight path! This unexpected bond between YouTube views and jet fuel usage not only challenges traditional research norms but also fosters a newfound appreciation for the interdisciplinary nature of statistical inquiry. It's like stumbling upon a mathematical Easter egg in a complex statistical model – a delightful and unforeseen surprise.

As we continue down this unexpected rabbit hole of statistical marvel, we are reminded that research is rife with unexpected connections waiting to be unveiled. Our findings open the door to a new avenue of exploration, much like a mind-bending puzzle that's just waiting to be solved. Who knows what other statistical gems await us in the vast landscape of research? With every new discovery, we find ourselves embracing the exhilarating ride of unraveling the unexpected, just like solving an enigmatic equation and discovering a jet fuel-powered punchline at the end.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Vihart YouTube videos and Jet fuel used in Liberia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
YouTube Views or Jet Fuel: Unraveling the Unexpected Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the uncharted territory of the unexpected correlation between total views on ViHart YouTube videos and the volume of jet fuel used in Liberia. As researchers, we may occasionally find ourselves in unexplored realms, but even we were bowled over by the potential link between online mathematical musings and the consumption of aviation fuel in a particular West African nation.

Employing a rigorous data analysis approach, we leveraged YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration’s repository to gather and scrutinize the pertinent information. The results unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9066327 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2009 to 2021. This unforeseen relationship may just fuel a new avenue of interdisciplinary research!

Now, for a little aerodynamic humor: Why don't we ever tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears! Just like our findings, some connections are truly out of left field.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Solving the enigmatic mysteries of our world often requires venturing into uncharted territories, where unexpected connections and correlations may lurk in the most unlikely of places. In the realm of scientific inquiry, our pursuit of knowledge occasionally leads us down paths that surprise even the most seasoned researchers. Imagine our astonishment when, in the course of our investigations, we stumbled upon a perplexing relationship between the total views on ViHart’s enthralling YouTube math videos and the rather unexpected variable of jet fuel consumption in Liberia.
As the saying goes, "When it comes to research, the sky's the limit." Our curiosity was piqued by this peculiar confluence of variables, prompting us to embark on an unconventional quest to disentangle the web of causation – or perhaps causation’s flight path – that could underpin such an unforeseen association. This unexpected connection may lack common ground, but much like a maths problem, a broader perspective can lead to some surprising solutions!
The sheer audacity of exploring this unforeseen correlation is enough to make even the most stoic statistician quiver – but fear not, we proceeded with the utmost rigor in our empirical examination. In the spirit of statistical inquiry, our research design certainly took flight as we meticulously curated data from ViHart’s YouTube channel, navigating the intricacies of viewer engagement and taking our analysis to new heights. And speaking of new heights, have you heard about the mathematician who is afraid of negative numbers? He will stop at nothing to avoid them!
This empirical trajectory did not stop there; we also accessed data on jet fuel consumption from the Energy Information Administration, uncovering the underlying trends and patterns across the years. The relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables unfolded before our eyes, much like the unrolling of a precise mathematical algorithm. It's quite the paradox, isn't it? Much like the aviation industry, we too have charted a new course.
Armed with our arsenal of statistical tools, we delved into the numbers and emerged with a correlation coefficient that left us truly aflutter. With a coefficient of 0.9066327 and a p-value of less than 0.01, the evidence for this surprising relationship soared to new statistical heights. But let's not get too carried away – after all, correlation does not imply causation, much like the presence of a stethoscope does not necessarily indicate a good sense of humor.
This unexpected confluence of variables offers a unique opportunity to explore the uncharted territory at the intersection of online engagement and real-world consumption patterns. It's a true statistical anomaly, much like finding a four-leaf clover in a haystack. As we soar into the findings and implications of this research, let's not lose sight of the fact that, in the world of statistics, the most improbable connections can lead to the most enlightening revelations.

[[RESULTS]]
The unanticipated relationship between total views on ViHart's esoteric YouTube videos and the consumption of jet fuel in Liberia has baffled even the most seasoned researchers. Our statistical analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9066327, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. In layman's terms, the more views ViHart's videos garnered, the more jet fuel was consumed in Liberia. It's like trying to solve a complex equation and finding out the answer is "jet fuel" - talk about an unexpected solution!
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8219829 suggests that approximately 82.2% of the variability in jet fuel consumption can be explained by the total views on ViHart's YouTube channel. This means that ViHart's mathematical musings may have a substantial influence on the aviation activities in Liberia, which adds a whole new dimension to the term "mathematical impact", doesn't it?
The significance level (p < 0.01) of the correlation coefficient indicates that this relationship is unlikely to have occurred by chance. In other words, the probability of these findings being a fluke is less than 1 in 100, or in more colloquial terms, it's as rare as finding a quadratic equation in a haystack!
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between total views on ViHart's YouTube videos and the volume of jet fuel used in Liberia. The data points are so tightly clustered around the regression line, it's almost as if they're all on the same flight path!
These findings challenge traditional research conventions and inspire a new wave of interdisciplinary inquiry. Who would have thought that a YouTube math sensation could have such a tangible impact on the fuel consumption of a whole nation? It's like finding the missing variable in an equation – unexpected and just a little bit thrilling!
Stay tuned for the discussion section, where we will unravel the implications of this unprecedented correlation and delve into the potential avenues for future research. After all, in the world of statistics, the most improbable connections can lead to the most enlightening revelations – much like finding a statistical gem hidden in the data haystack!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the results of our study uncover a surprising and robust correlation between the total views on ViHart's captivating YouTube channel and the volume of jet fuel used in Liberia. This uncanny relationship, with a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9066327 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01, has left us in a statistical tailspin. It's like solving a trigonometric equation and discovering that the solution revolves around jet fuel – truly a mind-bending revelation!

This unexpected finding has the potential to revolutionize our understanding of how online mathematical engagement can intersect with real-world energy consumption. It's a statistical conundrum of epic proportions, akin to finding a fractal pattern in a data set. As we grapple with the implications of this correlation, it's like navigating a statistical maze with unforeseen twists and turns at every corner.

Moreover, the r-squared value of 0.8219829 underscores the substantial influence of ViHart's mathematical musings on the aviation activities in Liberia. It's like solving a complex mathematical problem and realizing that the solution has taken flight – an unexpected turn of events, to say the least.

As we wrap up this study, it's clear that no more research is needed in this area. The results speak for themselves, and the unexpected connection between YouTube views and jet fuel consumption has certainly given us a statistical rollercoaster ride. It's like trying to graph a parabola and ending up with an aviation itinerary!

In the words of ViHart herself, "Math is like a beautiful language, and we've just stumbled upon a surprising dialect in the relationship between online engagement and real-world energy usage." This correlation may be an outlier, but much like a statistical anomaly, it has the potential to spark new insights and inquiries in the field of interdisciplinary research.

Ladies and gentlemen, this statistical saga has come to a close, and we bid farewell to this unexpected correlation with the assurance that, in the world of statistics, the most improbable connections can lead to the most enlightening revelations. As for ViHart and jet fuel, well, that's a relationship worth further exploration, but for now, let's revel in the statistical quirkiness of this improbable confluence of variables.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited YouTube Views or Jet Fuel: Unraveling the Unexpected Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Modern Alchemy


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited YouTube Views or Jet Fuel: Unraveling the Unexpected Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Meta-Entertainment Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled YouTube Views or Jet Fuel: Unraveling the Unexpected Connection with an abstract of This study delves into the uncharted territory of the unexpected correlation between total views on ViHart YouTube videos and the volume of jet fuel used in Liberia. As researchers, we may occasionally find ourselves in unexplored realms, but even we were bowled over by the potential link between online mathematical musings and the consumption of aviation fuel in a particular West African nation.
Employing a rigorous data analysis approach, we leveraged YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration’s repository to gather and scrutinize the pertinent information. The results unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9066327 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2009 to 2021. This unforeseen relationship may just fuel a new avenue of interdisciplinary research!
Now, for a little aerodynamic humor: Why don't we ever tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears! Just like our findings, some connections are truly out of left field.

ChatGPT:

YouTube views, ViHart, YouTube analytics, jet fuel consumption, Liberia, correlation coefficient, data analysis, Energy Information Administration, aviation fuel, mathematical musings, West Africa, interdisciplinary research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Total views on Vihart's YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total views on Vihart YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
Additional Info: Current total views of videos released that year.

See what else correlates with Total views on Vihart's YouTube videos

Jet fuel used in Liberia
Detailed data title: Volume of jet fuel used consumed in Liberia in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Jet fuel used in Liberia

Correlation r = 0.9066327 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8219829 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Jet fuel used in Liberia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Total views on Vihart's YouTube videos) over the 13 years from 2009 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.9E-5. 0.0000192530204574463280000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 0.0019% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 51,940 random variables You don't actually need 51 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.71, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Total views on Vihart's YouTube videos (Total views)158424019717300265144005362430025059500548132034699803674770538472036375601069850363963652344
Jet fuel used in Liberia (Million Barrels/Day)0.2553980.3433950.3529610.5573290.3262080.3828560.2410060.2383330.2389860.2389860.2389860.2282070.240797




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
  5. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1584240,19717300,26514400,53624300,25059500,5481320,3469980,3674770,5384720,3637560,1069850,363963,652344,])
array_2 = np.array([0.255398,0.343395,0.352961,0.557329,0.326208,0.382856,0.241006,0.238333,0.238986,0.238986,0.238986,0.228207,0.240797,])
array_1_name = "Total views on Vihart's YouTube videos"
array_2_name = "Jet fuel used in Liberia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 5518 · Black Variable ID: 25562 · Red Variable ID: 24632
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0