about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,510 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the 'floss dance' meme and the second variable is The number of archivists in Ohio.  The chart goes from 2006 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the 'floss dance' meme gained popularity, it sparked a wave of interest in preserving this iconic cultural movement for future generations. This led to an unexpected surge in archivist positions in Ohio, as they scrambled to document and categorize every flossing video and tutorial for archival purposes. Who knew that a dance craze could lead to a floss-ophy of preserving pop culture history in the buckeye state!

Create a meme inspired by the floss dance meme that in some way references The number of archivists in Ohio. Try to emulate the style of the meme - don’t violate the copyright, just make it look and feel like the original meme.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Popularity of the 'floss dance' meme positively influenced The number of archivists in Ohio.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Feasibility of Floss and Filings: The Floss Dance Meme and the Flourish of Ohio's Archivists

The Journal of Memes and Movement Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'floss dance' meme and The number of archivists in Ohio. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8045275 and p < 0.01 for 2006 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Feasibility of Floss and Filings: The Floss Dance Meme and the Flourish of Ohio's Archivists

[[ABSTRACT]]
The Floss dance meme has taken the world by storm, captivating audiences with its simple yet subtly challenging moves. Its trendiness has left many wondering about its potential impact beyond the realm of entertainment. In this study, we delved into the unorthodox pairing of the Floss dance and the number of archivists in Ohio, to uncover the unexpected bond between pop culture and professional demographic trends. Using data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we applied statistical analysis to scrutinize the correlation between the rise and fall of the Floss dance's popularity and the concurrent evolution of the archivist workforce in the state of Ohio. Surprisingly, our results unveiled a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8045275, with a p-value less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2006 to 2022. Our findings indicate a quizzical relationship between the virality of the Floss dance meme and the burgeoning landscape of archivists in Ohio, sparking further inquiries into the peculiar dynamics of cultural phenomena and vocational pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'floss dance' meme and The number of archivists in Ohio. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Feasibility of Floss and Filings: The Floss Dance Meme and the Flourish of Ohio's Archivists

[[ABSTRACT]]
The Floss dance meme has taken the world by storm, captivating audiences with its simple yet subtly challenging moves. Its trendiness has left many wondering about its potential impact beyond the realm of entertainment. In this study, we delved into the unorthodox pairing of the Floss dance and the number of archivists in Ohio, to uncover the unexpected bond between pop culture and professional demographic trends. Using data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we applied statistical analysis to scrutinize the correlation between the rise and fall of the Floss dance's popularity and the concurrent evolution of the archivist workforce in the state of Ohio. Surprisingly, our results unveiled a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8045275, with a p-value less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2006 to 2022. Our findings indicate a quizzical relationship between the virality of the Floss dance meme and the burgeoning landscape of archivists in Ohio, sparking further inquiries into the peculiar dynamics of cultural phenomena and vocational pursuits.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the ever-evolving landscape of viral sensations, few phenomena capture the collective attention of the masses like the Floss dance meme. This seemingly innocuous fad has swept through the digital realm, leaving indelible footprints on popular culture. Yet, amidst the sea of online dance tutorials and public Floss-offs, little attention has been paid to the potential implications of this viral sensation on professional demographics. Until now.

In this study, we embark on a quest to uncover the enigmatic relationship between the Floss dance meme and the number of archivists in the state of Ohio. Yes, you read that right. We chose to investigate the inexplicably intertwined fate of rhythmic gyrations and the custodians of historical records. Our inquiry was fueled by a curiosity that borders on the absurd, but as they say, curiosity is the seed of innovation.

As we delve into this quirky conundrum, we aim to decipher whether the appeal of the Floss dance meme has influenced the career choices of Ohioans, specifically those drawn to the meticulous art of archiving. Our foray into this uncharted territory seeks to unravel the peculiar dynamics of cultural phenomena and vocational inclinations, shedding light on the whimsical connections that often elude our conventional understanding.

So, buckle up, dear readers, as we embark on a whimsical journey through the annals of dance crazes and labor statistics, in a quest to unveil the unforeseen correlations and perhaps a few groovy surprises along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'floss dance' meme and The number of archivists in Ohio. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Feasibility of Floss and Filings: The Floss Dance Meme and the Flourish of Ohio's Archivists

[[ABSTRACT]]
The Floss dance meme has taken the world by storm, captivating audiences with its simple yet subtly challenging moves. Its trendiness has left many wondering about its potential impact beyond the realm of entertainment. In this study, we delved into the unorthodox pairing of the Floss dance and the number of archivists in Ohio, to uncover the unexpected bond between pop culture and professional demographic trends. Using data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we applied statistical analysis to scrutinize the correlation between the rise and fall of the Floss dance's popularity and the concurrent evolution of the archivist workforce in the state of Ohio. Surprisingly, our results unveiled a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8045275, with a p-value less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2006 to 2022. Our findings indicate a quizzical relationship between the virality of the Floss dance meme and the burgeoning landscape of archivists in Ohio, sparking further inquiries into the peculiar dynamics of cultural phenomena and vocational pursuits.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the ever-evolving landscape of viral sensations, few phenomena capture the collective attention of the masses like the Floss dance meme. This seemingly innocuous fad has swept through the digital realm, leaving indelible footprints on popular culture. Yet, amidst the sea of online dance tutorials and public Floss-offs, little attention has been paid to the potential implications of this viral sensation on professional demographics. Until now.
In this study, we embark on a quest to uncover the enigmatic relationship between the Floss dance meme and the number of archivists in the state of Ohio. Yes, you read that right. We chose to investigate the inexplicably intertwined fate of rhythmic gyrations and the custodians of historical records. Our inquiry was fueled by a curiosity that borders on the absurd, but as they say, curiosity is the seed of innovation.
As we delve into this quirky conundrum, we aim to decipher whether the appeal of the Floss dance meme has influenced the career choices of Ohioans, specifically those drawn to the meticulous art of archiving. Our foray into this uncharted territory seeks to unravel the peculiar dynamics of cultural phenomena and vocational inclinations, shedding light on the whimsical connections that often elude our conventional understanding.
So, buckle up, dear readers, as we embark on a whimsical journey through the annals of dance crazes and labor statistics, in a quest to unveil the unforeseen correlations and perhaps a few groovy surprises along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In examining the curious collision of the Floss dance meme and the number of archivists in Ohio, our search for related scholarly work led us to a plethora of studies and analyses on both cultural phenomena and labor force trends. Smith et al., in their seminal work "The Impact of Viral Trends on Professional Demographics," explore the influence of internet memes on career choices, though they notably omitted any mention of archival pursuits. Nevertheless, their comprehensive approach to understanding the ripple effects of viral trends provides a solid foundation for our investigation.

Similarly, Doe's "The Floss Dance Phenomenon: A Social and Cultural Analysis" presents a comprehensive overview of the social implications of the Floss dance meme, shedding light on its impact on diverse facets of contemporary society. Regrettably, Doe's work also overlooks the connection to archivists in Ohio, an omission that mirrors the oversight prevalent in existing literature.

Jones' groundbreaking research in "Occupational Trends Across Unlikely Viral Phenomena" takes a bold leap into the exploration of uncommon linkages between internet sensations and professional vocations. However, the absence of any reference to the Floss dance meme and Ohio's archivist workforce underscores the dearth of prior investigations into this peculiar pairing.

Moving beyond the realm of academic research, several non-fiction books offer insights that partially relate to our offbeat inquiry. "Dancing in the Digital Age: A Cultural Shift in Motion" by Jane A. Scholar meticulously dissects the impact of digital dance crazes on contemporary culture. While the focus lies predominantly on broader societal influences, the book provides a glimpse into the potential interplay between viral dances and occupational trends, setting the stage for our unconventional dive into the Floss dance and archivist correlation.

On the fictional front, "The Archivist’s Secret: Unearthing History's Rhythmic Riddles" by A. Novelist weaves an imaginative tale of an archivist whose discoveries are intertwined with the dance moves of a bygone era. Although a work of fiction, the parallels drawn between archival pursuits and rhythmic expressions serve as a whimsical backdrop to our investigation, infusing a dash of fantastical inspiration into our unconventional research endeavor.

In a lighthearted detour, we sought guidance from the animated world, turning our attention to children's cartoons and shows known for their memorable dance sequences. As we dove into the playful world of animated characters, we watched episodes of "The Lively Librarian" and "Dance-o-mania Detectives," exploring the realms of dance and archiving through the lens of entertaining children's programming.

With an array of scholarly inquiries, peculiar fiction, and animated whimsy at our disposal, we navigate through uncharted territory, equipped with knowledge, imagination, and an unabashed sense of humor, as we prepare to unravel the eccentric enigma of the Floss dance meme and the surge of Ohio's archivists.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'floss dance' meme and The number of archivists in Ohio. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2006 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Feasibility of Floss and Filings: The Floss Dance Meme and the Flourish of Ohio's Archivists

[[ABSTRACT]]
The Floss dance meme has taken the world by storm, captivating audiences with its simple yet subtly challenging moves. Its trendiness has left many wondering about its potential impact beyond the realm of entertainment. In this study, we delved into the unorthodox pairing of the Floss dance and the number of archivists in Ohio, to uncover the unexpected bond between pop culture and professional demographic trends. Using data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we applied statistical analysis to scrutinize the correlation between the rise and fall of the Floss dance's popularity and the concurrent evolution of the archivist workforce in the state of Ohio. Surprisingly, our results unveiled a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8045275, with a p-value less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2006 to 2022. Our findings indicate a quizzical relationship between the virality of the Floss dance meme and the burgeoning landscape of archivists in Ohio, sparking further inquiries into the peculiar dynamics of cultural phenomena and vocational pursuits.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the ever-evolving landscape of viral sensations, few phenomena capture the collective attention of the masses like the Floss dance meme. This seemingly innocuous fad has swept through the digital realm, leaving indelible footprints on popular culture. Yet, amidst the sea of online dance tutorials and public Floss-offs, little attention has been paid to the potential implications of this viral sensation on professional demographics. Until now.
In this study, we embark on a quest to uncover the enigmatic relationship between the Floss dance meme and the number of archivists in the state of Ohio. Yes, you read that right. We chose to investigate the inexplicably intertwined fate of rhythmic gyrations and the custodians of historical records. Our inquiry was fueled by a curiosity that borders on the absurd, but as they say, curiosity is the seed of innovation.
As we delve into this quirky conundrum, we aim to decipher whether the appeal of the Floss dance meme has influenced the career choices of Ohioans, specifically those drawn to the meticulous art of archiving. Our foray into this uncharted territory seeks to unravel the peculiar dynamics of cultural phenomena and vocational inclinations, shedding light on the whimsical connections that often elude our conventional understanding.
So, buckle up, dear readers, as we embark on a whimsical journey through the annals of dance crazes and labor statistics, in a quest to unveil the unforeseen correlations and perhaps a few groovy surprises along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To extract valid and reliable data for our investigation into the captivating correlation between the popularity of the Floss dance meme and the number of archivists in Ohio, we employed a methodological amalgamation that mirrored the eccentricity of our research question. Our data collection phase involved a meticulous trawl through the digital domain, with a particular affinity for Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. After all, where better to unravel the convoluted connection between contemporary dance crazes and professional vocational trends than the quirky quagmire of the internet?

First, we delved into the depths of Google Trends, prodding and poking at the search interest trends for the 'Floss dance' across the years 2006 to 2022. We meticulously examined the peaks and troughs of its popularity, navigating through the ephemeral eddies of online adulation that define viral sensations.

Next, we ventured into the hallowed halls of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, seeking the hushed murmurs of employment data for archivists in the state of Ohio from 2006 to 2022. We meticulously scoured through the archives of occupational employment and wages, in a quest to unveil the clandestine evolution of the archivist workforce amidst the ebb and flow of societal trends.

With our quirky quiver of data in hand, we embarked on the treacherous terrain of statistical analysis. We harnessed the formidable power of correlation analysis, concocting complex algorithms in the pursuit of numerical enlightenment. Through diligent calculations, we unveiled the enigmatic correlation coefficient that encapsulated the pulsating rapport between the Floss dance meme and the number of archivists in Ohio. Our statistical odyssey ultimately culminated in the inexplicable discovery of a correlation coefficient of 0.8045275, with a p-value less than 0.01, illuminating the confounding connection between two seemingly disparate realms.

In summary, our methodology reflects the idiosyncratic nature of our research question, blending the rigors of statistical analysis with the serendipitous charm of online data harvesting. This zany combination ultimately paved the way for unearthing the harmonic convergence between the rhythmic allure of the Floss dance meme and the burgeoning landscape of archivists in Ohio.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'floss dance' meme and The number of archivists in Ohio. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2006 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8045275, r-squared of 0.6472645, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Feasibility of Floss and Filings: The Floss Dance Meme and the Flourish of Ohio's Archivists

[[ABSTRACT]]
The Floss dance meme has taken the world by storm, captivating audiences with its simple yet subtly challenging moves. Its trendiness has left many wondering about its potential impact beyond the realm of entertainment. In this study, we delved into the unorthodox pairing of the Floss dance and the number of archivists in Ohio, to uncover the unexpected bond between pop culture and professional demographic trends. Using data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we applied statistical analysis to scrutinize the correlation between the rise and fall of the Floss dance's popularity and the concurrent evolution of the archivist workforce in the state of Ohio. Surprisingly, our results unveiled a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8045275, with a p-value less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2006 to 2022. Our findings indicate a quizzical relationship between the virality of the Floss dance meme and the burgeoning landscape of archivists in Ohio, sparking further inquiries into the peculiar dynamics of cultural phenomena and vocational pursuits.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the ever-evolving landscape of viral sensations, few phenomena capture the collective attention of the masses like the Floss dance meme. This seemingly innocuous fad has swept through the digital realm, leaving indelible footprints on popular culture. Yet, amidst the sea of online dance tutorials and public Floss-offs, little attention has been paid to the potential implications of this viral sensation on professional demographics. Until now.
In this study, we embark on a quest to uncover the enigmatic relationship between the Floss dance meme and the number of archivists in the state of Ohio. Yes, you read that right. We chose to investigate the inexplicably intertwined fate of rhythmic gyrations and the custodians of historical records. Our inquiry was fueled by a curiosity that borders on the absurd, but as they say, curiosity is the seed of innovation.
As we delve into this quirky conundrum, we aim to decipher whether the appeal of the Floss dance meme has influenced the career choices of Ohioans, specifically those drawn to the meticulous art of archiving. Our foray into this uncharted territory seeks to unravel the peculiar dynamics of cultural phenomena and vocational inclinations, shedding light on the whimsical connections that often elude our conventional understanding.
So, buckle up, dear readers, as we embark on a whimsical journey through the annals of dance crazes and labor statistics, in a quest to unveil the unforeseen correlations and perhaps a few groovy surprises along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the Floss dance meme and the number of archivists in Ohio unearthed some truly unexpected and, dare I say, funky results. The correlation coefficient of 0.8045275 suggested a strong positive relationship between the two variables over the period from 2006 to 2022. This finding indicates that as the Floss dance meme garnered more attention, the number of archivists in Ohio also experienced a notable increase.

We also observed an r-squared value of 0.6472645, underscoring the proportion of the variance in archivist numbers in Ohio that can be explained by the fluctuating popularity of the Floss dance meme. In essence, the Floss dance meme appears to waltz hand in hand with the number of archivists in Ohio, painting a picture of an unexpectedly synchronized dance floor.

The significance level of p < 0.01 further solidified the robustness of our findings, affirming that the observed relationship between the Floss dance meme and archivist numbers in Ohio is not merely a result of chance. It seems that the allure of the Floss dance meme may have indeed exerted a peculiar influence on the labor market for archivists in the Buckeye State.

As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot demonstrates the conspicuous upward trend in both the Floss dance meme's popularity and the number of archivists in Ohio, showcasing their peculiar correlation. The plot is a visual testament to the unforeseen dance of cultural trends and professional vocations, capturing the quirky essence of our findings.

In light of these results, it appears that the allure of the Floss dance meme may have left an indelible mark not only on the digital dance floor but also in the realms of labor and employment, unveiling an intriguing intersection between pop culture and professional pursuits. This unexpected correlation sparks a playful rumination on the uncharted territory where viral sensations and vocational preferences intersect, igniting curiosity and raising questions about the subtle yet significant influence of cultural trends on career pathways.

In the words of the famous dancer Fred Astaire, "The higher up you go, the more mistakes you are allowed. Right at the top, if you make enough of them, it's considered to be your style." And perhaps, in the convoluted dance of cultural phenomena and labor dynamics, the unforeseen correlation between the Floss dance meme and the number of archivists in Ohio has unintentionally crafted its own unique style.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'floss dance' meme and The number of archivists in Ohio. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Feasibility of Floss and Filings: The Floss Dance Meme and the Flourish of Ohio's Archivists

[[ABSTRACT]]
The Floss dance meme has taken the world by storm, captivating audiences with its simple yet subtly challenging moves. Its trendiness has left many wondering about its potential impact beyond the realm of entertainment. In this study, we delved into the unorthodox pairing of the Floss dance and the number of archivists in Ohio, to uncover the unexpected bond between pop culture and professional demographic trends. Using data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we applied statistical analysis to scrutinize the correlation between the rise and fall of the Floss dance's popularity and the concurrent evolution of the archivist workforce in the state of Ohio. Surprisingly, our results unveiled a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8045275, with a p-value less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2006 to 2022. Our findings indicate a quizzical relationship between the virality of the Floss dance meme and the burgeoning landscape of archivists in Ohio, sparking further inquiries into the peculiar dynamics of cultural phenomena and vocational pursuits.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In examining the curious collision of the Floss dance meme and the number of archivists in Ohio, our search for related scholarly work led us to a plethora of studies and analyses on both cultural phenomena and labor force trends. Smith et al., in their seminal work "The Impact of Viral Trends on Professional Demographics," explore the influence of internet memes on career choices, though they notably omitted any mention of archival pursuits. Nevertheless, their comprehensive approach to understanding the ripple effects of viral trends provides a solid foundation for our investigation.
Similarly, Doe's "The Floss Dance Phenomenon: A Social and Cultural Analysis" presents a comprehensive overview of the social implications of the Floss dance meme, shedding light on its impact on diverse facets of contemporary society. Regrettably, Doe's work also overlooks the connection to archivists in Ohio, an omission that mirrors the oversight prevalent in existing literature.
Jones' groundbreaking research in "Occupational Trends Across Unlikely Viral Phenomena" takes a bold leap into the exploration of uncommon linkages between internet sensations and professional vocations. However, the absence of any reference to the Floss dance meme and Ohio's archivist workforce underscores the dearth of prior investigations into this peculiar pairing.
Moving beyond the realm of academic research, several non-fiction books offer insights that partially relate to our offbeat inquiry. "Dancing in the Digital Age: A Cultural Shift in Motion" by Jane A. Scholar meticulously dissects the impact of digital dance crazes on contemporary culture. While the focus lies predominantly on broader societal influences, the book provides a glimpse into the potential interplay between viral dances and occupational trends, setting the stage for our unconventional dive into the Floss dance and archivist correlation.
On the fictional front, "The Archivist’s Secret: Unearthing History's Rhythmic Riddles" by A. Novelist weaves an imaginative tale of an archivist whose discoveries are intertwined with the dance moves of a bygone era. Although a work of fiction, the parallels drawn between archival pursuits and rhythmic expressions serve as a whimsical backdrop to our investigation, infusing a dash of fantastical inspiration into our unconventional research endeavor.
In a lighthearted detour, we sought guidance from the animated world, turning our attention to children's cartoons and shows known for their memorable dance sequences. As we dove into the playful world of animated characters, we watched episodes of "The Lively Librarian" and "Dance-o-mania Detectives," exploring the realms of dance and archiving through the lens of entertaining children's programming.
With an array of scholarly inquiries, peculiar fiction, and animated whimsy at our disposal, we navigate through uncharted territory, equipped with knowledge, imagination, and an unabashed sense of humor, as we prepare to unravel the eccentric enigma of the Floss dance meme and the surge of Ohio's archivists.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the Floss dance meme and the number of archivists in Ohio unearthed some truly unexpected and, dare I say, funky results. The correlation coefficient of 0.8045275 suggested a strong positive relationship between the two variables over the period from 2006 to 2022. This finding indicates that as the Floss dance meme garnered more attention, the number of archivists in Ohio also experienced a notable increase.
We also observed an r-squared value of 0.6472645, underscoring the proportion of the variance in archivist numbers in Ohio that can be explained by the fluctuating popularity of the Floss dance meme. In essence, the Floss dance meme appears to waltz hand in hand with the number of archivists in Ohio, painting a picture of an unexpectedly synchronized dance floor.
The significance level of p < 0.01 further solidified the robustness of our findings, affirming that the observed relationship between the Floss dance meme and archivist numbers in Ohio is not merely a result of chance. It seems that the allure of the Floss dance meme may have indeed exerted a peculiar influence on the labor market for archivists in the Buckeye State.
As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot demonstrates the conspicuous upward trend in both the Floss dance meme's popularity and the number of archivists in Ohio, showcasing their peculiar correlation. The plot is a visual testament to the unforeseen dance of cultural trends and professional vocations, capturing the quirky essence of our findings.
In light of these results, it appears that the allure of the Floss dance meme may have left an indelible mark not only on the digital dance floor but also in the realms of labor and employment, unveiling an intriguing intersection between pop culture and professional pursuits. This unexpected correlation sparks a playful rumination on the uncharted territory where viral sensations and vocational preferences intersect, igniting curiosity and raising questions about the subtle yet significant influence of cultural trends on career pathways.
In the words of the famous dancer Fred Astaire, "The higher up you go, the more mistakes you are allowed. Right at the top, if you make enough of them, it's considered to be your style." And perhaps, in the convoluted dance of cultural phenomena and labor dynamics, the unforeseen correlation between the Floss dance meme and the number of archivists in Ohio has unintentionally crafted its own unique style.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The unexpected and quirky correlation uncovered between the Floss dance meme and the number of archivists in Ohio appears to have waltzed its way into the realm of statistical significance. Our findings not only echo the prior research on the influence of viral trends on career choices but also add a whimsical twist by extending this connection to the rather specific domain of archival pursuits in Ohio.

Building on Smith et al.'s work, which illuminated the impact of internet memes on career choices, our study demonstrates a distinct parallel between the rise and fall of the Floss dance meme's popularity and the flux in the number of archivists in Ohio. It seems that the allure of the Floss dance might have indeed shaped the occupational pathways of individuals in Ohio, guiding them toward the exhilarating world of archiving.

Doe's insightful analysis of the social implications of the Floss dance phenomenon, though not directly considering archivists in Ohio, provides an illuminating backdrop for our research. It urges a reconsideration of the broader societal impacts of viral dance trends and the unforeseen reverberations on specific professional vocations. Our findings accentuate the need to delve deeper into the intricate interplay between pop culture and professional pursuits, championing the waltz between the two realms.

In this curious dance of cultural phenomena and labor dynamics, Jones' pioneering work on occupational trends across unlikely viral phenomena serves as a beacon of inspiration. While it did not traverse the uncharted territory of the Floss dance meme's connection to Ohio's archivist workforce, it has paved the way for our unconventional leap, underlining the value of investigating unconventional pairings in the professional landscape.

In the fictional world, "The Archivist’s Secret: Unearthing History's Rhythmic Riddles," by A. Novelist, may not have provided empirical evidence for the correlation between the Floss dance meme and the number of archivists in Ohio, but it sparks a lighthearted rumination on the potential interconnections between rhythmic expressions and archival pursuits. Our study materializes the whimsical possibilities hinted at in this work, showcasing the tangible link between an iconic viral dance and the archival domain.

The visual testament provided by our scatterplot not only illustrates the peculiar correlation between the Floss dance meme's popularity and the number of archivists in Ohio but also encapsulates the quirky essence of our findings. It is as if the digital dance floor has extended its influence into the professional arena, orchestrating an unforeseen dance between pop culture and vocational preferences.

As we reflect on the unforeseen correlation uncovered, it becomes evident that the Floss dance meme might have carved its own unique style in the convoluted dance of cultural phenomena and labor dynamics. It leaves us with an inexplicable allure, a playful rumination on the uncharted territory where viral sensations and vocational preferences intersect, propelling us to further explore the whimsical interplay of cultural trends and career trajectories.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'floss dance' meme and The number of archivists in Ohio. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Feasibility of Floss and Filings: The Floss Dance Meme and the Flourish of Ohio's Archivists

[[ABSTRACT]]
The Floss dance meme has taken the world by storm, captivating audiences with its simple yet subtly challenging moves. Its trendiness has left many wondering about its potential impact beyond the realm of entertainment. In this study, we delved into the unorthodox pairing of the Floss dance and the number of archivists in Ohio, to uncover the unexpected bond between pop culture and professional demographic trends. Using data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we applied statistical analysis to scrutinize the correlation between the rise and fall of the Floss dance's popularity and the concurrent evolution of the archivist workforce in the state of Ohio. Surprisingly, our results unveiled a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8045275, with a p-value less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2006 to 2022. Our findings indicate a quizzical relationship between the virality of the Floss dance meme and the burgeoning landscape of archivists in Ohio, sparking further inquiries into the peculiar dynamics of cultural phenomena and vocational pursuits.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the ever-evolving landscape of viral sensations, few phenomena capture the collective attention of the masses like the Floss dance meme. This seemingly innocuous fad has swept through the digital realm, leaving indelible footprints on popular culture. Yet, amidst the sea of online dance tutorials and public Floss-offs, little attention has been paid to the potential implications of this viral sensation on professional demographics. Until now.
In this study, we embark on a quest to uncover the enigmatic relationship between the Floss dance meme and the number of archivists in the state of Ohio. Yes, you read that right. We chose to investigate the inexplicably intertwined fate of rhythmic gyrations and the custodians of historical records. Our inquiry was fueled by a curiosity that borders on the absurd, but as they say, curiosity is the seed of innovation.
As we delve into this quirky conundrum, we aim to decipher whether the appeal of the Floss dance meme has influenced the career choices of Ohioans, specifically those drawn to the meticulous art of archiving. Our foray into this uncharted territory seeks to unravel the peculiar dynamics of cultural phenomena and vocational inclinations, shedding light on the whimsical connections that often elude our conventional understanding.
So, buckle up, dear readers, as we embark on a whimsical journey through the annals of dance crazes and labor statistics, in a quest to unveil the unforeseen correlations and perhaps a few groovy surprises along the way.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the Floss dance meme and the number of archivists in Ohio unearthed some truly unexpected and, dare I say, funky results. The correlation coefficient of 0.8045275 suggested a strong positive relationship between the two variables over the period from 2006 to 2022. This finding indicates that as the Floss dance meme garnered more attention, the number of archivists in Ohio also experienced a notable increase.
We also observed an r-squared value of 0.6472645, underscoring the proportion of the variance in archivist numbers in Ohio that can be explained by the fluctuating popularity of the Floss dance meme. In essence, the Floss dance meme appears to waltz hand in hand with the number of archivists in Ohio, painting a picture of an unexpectedly synchronized dance floor.
The significance level of p < 0.01 further solidified the robustness of our findings, affirming that the observed relationship between the Floss dance meme and archivist numbers in Ohio is not merely a result of chance. It seems that the allure of the Floss dance meme may have indeed exerted a peculiar influence on the labor market for archivists in the Buckeye State.
As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot demonstrates the conspicuous upward trend in both the Floss dance meme's popularity and the number of archivists in Ohio, showcasing their peculiar correlation. The plot is a visual testament to the unforeseen dance of cultural trends and professional vocations, capturing the quirky essence of our findings.
In light of these results, it appears that the allure of the Floss dance meme may have left an indelible mark not only on the digital dance floor but also in the realms of labor and employment, unveiling an intriguing intersection between pop culture and professional pursuits. This unexpected correlation sparks a playful rumination on the uncharted territory where viral sensations and vocational preferences intersect, igniting curiosity and raising questions about the subtle yet significant influence of cultural trends on career pathways.
In the words of the famous dancer Fred Astaire, "The higher up you go, the more mistakes you are allowed. Right at the top, if you make enough of them, it's considered to be your style." And perhaps, in the convoluted dance of cultural phenomena and labor dynamics, the unforeseen correlation between the Floss dance meme and the number of archivists in Ohio has unintentionally crafted its own unique style.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the intricate dance between the Floss dance meme and the burgeoning number of archivists in Ohio, unraveling a correlation that defies conventional wisdom. With a robust correlation coefficient and a p-value leaving no room for chance, it appears that the infectious groove of the Floss dance has indeed left its mark on the seemingly unrelated domain of archival work. Perhaps it's time we rename it the "Archivists' Floss" or the "Floss-ive Records Movement."

This unforeseen relationship prompts us to ponder the whimsical interplay of cultural phenomena and vocational choices, evoking the image of archivists grooving to the beat of a digital meme. As we celebrate this peculiar connection, we bid adieu to further research in this area, believing it's best to leave the archives and the Floss dance to their unexpected and undeniably catchy conversation. After all, as the saying goes, "Let's not floss our way into overanalyzing this serendipitous correlation."

In the grand symphony of academia, our findings add a whimsical note, reminding us to never underestimate the quirky kinship between popular trends and professional destinies. As we twirl away from this curious connection, we leave it to future scholars to Cha-Cha-Slide into new research frontiers, while we sashay into the sunset, content in the knowledge that the Floss dance and archivists have found harmony in the unlikeliest of partnerships.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Feasibility of Floss and Filings: The Floss Dance Meme and the Flourish of Ohio's Archivists. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Memes and Movement Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Feasibility of Floss and Filings: The Floss Dance Meme and the Flourish of Ohio's Archivists. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Internet Dance Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Feasibility of Floss and Filings: The Floss Dance Meme and the Flourish of Ohio's Archivists with an abstract of The Floss dance meme has taken the world by storm, captivating audiences with its simple yet subtly challenging moves. Its trendiness has left many wondering about its potential impact beyond the realm of entertainment. In this study, we delved into the unorthodox pairing of the Floss dance and the number of archivists in Ohio, to uncover the unexpected bond between pop culture and professional demographic trends. Using data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we applied statistical analysis to scrutinize the correlation between the rise and fall of the Floss dance's popularity and the concurrent evolution of the archivist workforce in the state of Ohio. Surprisingly, our results unveiled a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8045275, with a p-value less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2006 to 2022. Our findings indicate a quizzical relationship between the virality of the Floss dance meme and the burgeoning landscape of archivists in Ohio, sparking further inquiries into the peculiar dynamics of cultural phenomena and vocational pursuits.

ChatGPT:

Floss dance meme, archivists in Ohio, Google Trends, Bureau of Labor Statistics, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, viral meme impact, vocational pursuits, cultural phenomena

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the 'floss dance' meme
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'floss dance' (without quotes, in the United States)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.

See what else correlates with Popularity of the 'floss dance' meme

The number of archivists in Ohio
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of archivists in Ohio
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of archivists in Ohio

Correlation r = 0.8045275 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6472645 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 64.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of archivists in Ohio) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the 'floss dance' meme) over the 17 years from 2006 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.9E-5. 0.0000986137363467092300000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.8 in 0.0099% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 10,141 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 16 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 16 because we have two variables measured over a period of 17 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.53, 0.93 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the 'floss dance' meme (Relative popularity)0.3333330.5555560.4285710.66666700.500000.83.2554.666716.83337.666673.666673.33333
The number of archivists in Ohio (Archivists)14012011090120140160140150130120120230190140110110




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.333333,0.555556,0.428571,0.666667,0,0.5,0,0,0,0,0.8,3.25,54.6667,16.8333,7.66667,3.66667,3.33333,])
array_2 = np.array([140,120,110,90,120,140,160,140,150,130,120,120,230,190,140,110,110,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the 'floss dance' meme"
array_2_name = "The number of archivists in Ohio"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 5510 · Black Variable ID: 25130 · Red Variable ID: 17287
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0