Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the number of lawyers in the United States increased, so did the amount of paperwork and legal jargon. This inadvertently led to more people seeking lighthearted entertainment to balance out the serious and complex nature of the legal world. Simone Giertz's quirky and amusing YouTube videos became a go-to source of comic relief, boosting her total likes as viewers turned to her unique content to escape the legal mumbo jumbo. It's a case of laughter being the best (legal) medicine! Or perhaps, as the legal field expanded, so did the demand for unconventional robot humor, creating a circuitous connection between lawyers and Giertz's YouTube popularity.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a dazzling city skyline at night, filled with towering law offices adorned with glowing neon signs. The streets are bustling with activity as swarms of lawyers make their way inside, while stacks of paperwork reach towards the sky, engulfing the buildings in a wave of legal jargon. In the midst of this organized chaos, a cozy apartment stands out, where Simone Giertz is seen tinkering away on one of her quirky robot inventions. As the legal world spins in complexity, a contrasting scene emerges as viewers flock to Simone's YouTube channel, represented by a humorous and welcoming atmosphere that offers a refreshing escape from the seriousness of the legal realm. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Number of Lawyers in the United States and Total likes of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Minimalism A TIME magazine cover image Photorealism Vaporwave High-tech
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Number of Lawyers in the United States and Total likes of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos, in the following situation: As the number of lawyers in the United States increased, so did the amount of paperwork and legal jargon. This inadvertently led to more people seeking lighthearted entertainment to balance out the serious and complex nature of the legal world. Simone Giertz's quirky and amusing YouTube videos became a go-to source of comic relief, boosting her total likes as viewers turned to her unique content to escape the legal mumbo jumbo. It's a case of laughter being the best (legal) medicine! Or perhaps, as the legal field expanded, so did the demand for unconventional robot humor, creating a circuitous connection between lawyers and Giertz's YouTube popularity.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the bustling city streets, law offices towered high, their neon signs flickering as more and more lawyers streamed in. Amidst the organized chaos, stacks of paperwork seemed to grow ever taller, creating an overwhelming wave of legal jargon. On the other side of town, in a cozy apartment, Simone Giertz tinkered away, creating one of her hilarious and quirky robot inventions. As the legal world swirled with complexity, more and more viewers flocked to Simone's YouTube channel, hitting the 'like' button on her videos as her unique humor offered a much-needed escape from the seriousness of the legal world.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In the bustling city streets, law offices towered high, their neon signs flickering as more and more lawyers streamed in. Amidst the organized chaos, stacks of paperwork seemed to grow ever taller, creating an overwhelming wave of legal jargon. On the other side of town, in a cozy apartment, Simone Giertz tinkered away, creating one of her hilarious and quirky robot inventions. As the legal world swirled with complexity, more and more viewers flocked to Simone's YouTube channel, hitting the 'like' button on her videos as her unique humor offered a much-needed escape from the seriousness of the legal world. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a dazzling city skyline at night, filled with towering law offices adorned with glowing neon signs. The streets are bustling with activity as swarms of lawyers make their way inside, while stacks of paperwork reach towards the sky, engulfing the buildings in a wave of legal jargon. In the midst of this organized chaos, a cozy apartment stands out, where Simone Giertz is seen tinkering away on one of her quirky robot inventions. As the legal world spins in complexity, a contrasting scene emerges as viewers flock to Simone's YouTube channel, represented by a humorous and welcoming atmosphere that offers a refreshing escape from the seriousness of the legal realm.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Number of Lawyers in the United States caused Total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos to increase.
AI academic paper
Legal Eagles and Simone's Steeple: Unraveling the Correlation Between the Number of Lawyers in the United States and Total Likes on Simone Giertz YouTube Videos The Journal of Legal and Digital Analytics Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Lawyers in the United States and Total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.
Your research team used data from ABA and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9656247 and p < 0.01 for 2014 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Legal Eagles and Simone's Steeple: Unraveling the Correlation Between the Number of Lawyers in the United States and Total Likes on Simone Giertz YouTube Videos"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intriguing connection between the number of legal practitioners in the United States and the total likes garnered by the YouTube videos of Simone Giertz, the queen of quirky robotics. Diving into this uncharted territory, we aimed to decipher whether there exists a significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables that has eluded scholars and joke enthusiasts alike. Cue the "lawyer up and likes go up" dad joke!
Utilizing extensive data sourced from the American Bar Association (ABA) and YouTube, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to shed light on this enigmatic linkage. Our findings unveiled a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9656247 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2022, which left our team pleasantly surprised, not unlike when a lawyer successfully tells a joke. Get it? Lawyer jokes?
These results not only illuminate a previously overlooked association between renowned maker and YouTuber Simone Giertz and the legal profession, but also serve as a captivating example of the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated domains. As we forge ahead in understanding the intricacies of this correlation, the findings of this study offer a new perspective on the impact of legal eagles on the realm of YouTube stardom. Stay tuned for more surprising alliances and statistical shenanigans in the world of academia!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Lawyers in the United States and Total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Legal Eagles and Simone's Steeple: Unraveling the Correlation Between the Number of Lawyers in the United States and Total Likes on Simone Giertz YouTube Videos"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intriguing connection between the number of legal practitioners in the United States and the total likes garnered by the YouTube videos of Simone Giertz, the queen of quirky robotics. Diving into this uncharted territory, we aimed to decipher whether there exists a significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables that has eluded scholars and joke enthusiasts alike. Cue the "lawyer up and likes go up" dad joke!
Utilizing extensive data sourced from the American Bar Association (ABA) and YouTube, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to shed light on this enigmatic linkage. Our findings unveiled a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9656247 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2022, which left our team pleasantly surprised, not unlike when a lawyer successfully tells a joke. Get it? Lawyer jokes?
These results not only illuminate a previously overlooked association between renowned maker and YouTuber Simone Giertz and the legal profession, but also serve as a captivating example of the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated domains. As we forge ahead in understanding the intricacies of this correlation, the findings of this study offer a new perspective on the impact of legal eagles on the realm of YouTube stardom. Stay tuned for more surprising alliances and statistical shenanigans in the world of academia!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of law and entertainment has long been a topic of scrutiny, with debates ranging from courtroom dramas to the intellectual property rights of fictional characters. However, in this study, we take a lighthearted yet rigorous approach to explore an unexpected connection: the correlation between the number of lawyers in the United States and the total likes garnered by the YouTube videos of Simone Giertz, the self-proclaimed queen of shoddy robots. It's time to bring the gavel down on this peculiar pairing and shed some light on whether legal prowess can translate into digital adoration. Let's see if lawyering up can lead to some YouTube "likes brief."
As we embark on this unconventional journey, it is essential to acknowledge the novelty of our subject matter. The juxtaposition of legal professionals and a content creator known for her quirky inventions may seem like a stretch, but as they say, the more eccentric the correlation, the more entertaining the statistical analysis. It's like trying to reconcile the relationship between a judge and a jest - unexpected, but potentially amusing.
Our research aims to saunter through uncharted statistical landscapes to decipher whether there exists a substantial correlation between the number of legal practitioners in the United States and the digital adoration bestowed upon Simone Giertz's inventive endeavors. It's like trying to put a patent on a legal precedent - unexpected, but potentially groundbreaking.
The pursuit of this peculiar correlation led us to wade through vast datasets, combining information on the number of lawyers from the American Bar Association (ABA) with the viral successes of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. It's like a legal case meets a robotic race - unexpected, but potentially captivating.
In the following sections, we present our comprehensive statistical analysis, unveiling a correlation coefficient that left us gasping for breath like a surprised plaintiff when faced with a brilliant courtroom maneuver. Additionally, we evaluate the implications of our findings and reflect on the broader significance of unexpectedly intertwined domains. It's like trying to decipher a legal code with a robotic twist - unexpected, but potentially eye-opening.
So, buckle up for a ride through the unusual terrain where law meets digital adoration - because in this study, legal eagles and Simone's steeple form an unexpectedly captivating correlation. Get ready for an analysis that's as delightful as a court-approved dad joke!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Lawyers in the United States and Total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Legal Eagles and Simone's Steeple: Unraveling the Correlation Between the Number of Lawyers in the United States and Total Likes on Simone Giertz YouTube Videos"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intriguing connection between the number of legal practitioners in the United States and the total likes garnered by the YouTube videos of Simone Giertz, the queen of quirky robotics. Diving into this uncharted territory, we aimed to decipher whether there exists a significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables that has eluded scholars and joke enthusiasts alike. Cue the "lawyer up and likes go up" dad joke!
Utilizing extensive data sourced from the American Bar Association (ABA) and YouTube, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to shed light on this enigmatic linkage. Our findings unveiled a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9656247 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2022, which left our team pleasantly surprised, not unlike when a lawyer successfully tells a joke. Get it? Lawyer jokes?
These results not only illuminate a previously overlooked association between renowned maker and YouTuber Simone Giertz and the legal profession, but also serve as a captivating example of the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated domains. As we forge ahead in understanding the intricacies of this correlation, the findings of this study offer a new perspective on the impact of legal eagles on the realm of YouTube stardom. Stay tuned for more surprising alliances and statistical shenanigans in the world of academia!
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of law and entertainment has long been a topic of scrutiny, with debates ranging from courtroom dramas to the intellectual property rights of fictional characters. However, in this study, we take a lighthearted yet rigorous approach to explore an unexpected connection: the correlation between the number of lawyers in the United States and the total likes garnered by the YouTube videos of Simone Giertz, the self-proclaimed queen of shoddy robots. It's time to bring the gavel down on this peculiar pairing and shed some light on whether legal prowess can translate into digital adoration. Let's see if lawyering up can lead to some YouTube "likes brief."
As we embark on this unconventional journey, it is essential to acknowledge the novelty of our subject matter. The juxtaposition of legal professionals and a content creator known for her quirky inventions may seem like a stretch, but as they say, the more eccentric the correlation, the more entertaining the statistical analysis. It's like trying to reconcile the relationship between a judge and a jest - unexpected, but potentially amusing.
Our research aims to saunter through uncharted statistical landscapes to decipher whether there exists a substantial correlation between the number of legal practitioners in the United States and the digital adoration bestowed upon Simone Giertz's inventive endeavors. It's like trying to put a patent on a legal precedent - unexpected, but potentially groundbreaking.
The pursuit of this peculiar correlation led us to wade through vast datasets, combining information on the number of lawyers from the American Bar Association (ABA) with the viral successes of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. It's like a legal case meets a robotic race - unexpected, but potentially captivating.
In the following sections, we present our comprehensive statistical analysis, unveiling a correlation coefficient that left us gasping for breath like a surprised plaintiff when faced with a brilliant courtroom maneuver. Additionally, we evaluate the implications of our findings and reflect on the broader significance of unexpectedly intertwined domains. It's like trying to decipher a legal code with a robotic twist - unexpected, but potentially eye-opening.
So, buckle up for a ride through the unusual terrain where law meets digital adoration - because in this study, legal eagles and Simone's steeple form an unexpectedly captivating correlation. Get ready for an analysis that's as delightful as a court-approved dad joke!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their study "The Legal Landscape: A Comprehensive Analysis of Legal Professionals in the United States," Smith et al. delve into the nuanced demographics of the legal profession, examining the distribution of lawyers across different states and practice areas. While their focus lies on the structural composition of the legal workforce, the potential implications of the number of lawyers on digital phenomena remain unexplored. It's like they're meticulously laying the groundwork for a case, only to stumble upon a humorous legal loophole!
Furthermore, Doe's research in "The Evolution of Legal Education in the 21st Century" offers a comprehensive analysis of the changing trends in legal academia and the skill set demanded of future lawyers. However, the unforeseen impact of these evolving legal skills on the realm of YouTube likes remains conspicuously absent from the scope of their investigation. It's like they forgot to cross-examine the potential influence of legal education on digital admiration!
Jones et al., in their work "Legal Ethics in a Global Context," investigate the ethical dilemmas faced by legal professionals in an increasingly interconnected world. While their examination of ethical conundrums is undoubtedly enlightening, the connection between ethical lawyering and the online popularity of Simone Giertz's videos escapes their purview. It's like they're so focused on ethical quandaries that they missed the ethical duty to explore unforeseen correlations in the digital sphere!
Taking a departure from legal literature, the book "Robotic Revolution: How Technology is Shaping Our Future" by Robotics Industry Association provides a comprehensive overview of the growing impact of robotics in various domains. Though not directly related to the legal profession, this insightful work hints at the technological advancements that underpin Simone Giertz's creative endeavors and potential implications for the legal-YouTube likes correlation. It's like a robot lawyer making a compelling case for its relevance in this study!
On the fictional front, Dan Brown's "The Da Vinci Code" weaves a thrilling tale of symbology and cryptic puzzles, drawing readers into a world of hidden connections and unexpected revelations. While the book's plot centers on historical enigmas, the spirit of unraveling mysterious correlations aligns with our endeavor to decode the digital intrigue between lawyers and Simone Giertz's YouTube popularity. It's like we're on the verge of cracking a code that will reveal the legal-da Vinci correlation!
Adding a cinematic touch, "Legally Blonde" and "RoboCop" emerge as tangentially related films that humorously blend legal drama with technological innovation. While the former follows the comedic journey of a law student defying stereotypes, the latter delves into a dystopian future where robotic law enforcement collides with human ethics. These movies, though seemingly unrelated, mirror the unexpected fusion of domains that our study aims to explore. It's like Legally Blonde meets RoboCop in a courtroom where justice is served with a robotic twist!
As we traverse the realms of legal scholarship, fictional narratives, and cinematic portrayals, the uncharted territory of our research opens doors to unexpected parallels and humorous juxtapositions. It's like we're navigating a legal labyrinth, only to stumble upon a robot making dad jokes in the corner!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Lawyers in the United States and Total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from ABA and YouTube . You used data from 2014 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Legal Eagles and Simone's Steeple: Unraveling the Correlation Between the Number of Lawyers in the United States and Total Likes on Simone Giertz YouTube Videos"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intriguing connection between the number of legal practitioners in the United States and the total likes garnered by the YouTube videos of Simone Giertz, the queen of quirky robotics. Diving into this uncharted territory, we aimed to decipher whether there exists a significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables that has eluded scholars and joke enthusiasts alike. Cue the "lawyer up and likes go up" dad joke!
Utilizing extensive data sourced from the American Bar Association (ABA) and YouTube, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to shed light on this enigmatic linkage. Our findings unveiled a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9656247 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2022, which left our team pleasantly surprised, not unlike when a lawyer successfully tells a joke. Get it? Lawyer jokes?
These results not only illuminate a previously overlooked association between renowned maker and YouTuber Simone Giertz and the legal profession, but also serve as a captivating example of the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated domains. As we forge ahead in understanding the intricacies of this correlation, the findings of this study offer a new perspective on the impact of legal eagles on the realm of YouTube stardom. Stay tuned for more surprising alliances and statistical shenanigans in the world of academia!
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of law and entertainment has long been a topic of scrutiny, with debates ranging from courtroom dramas to the intellectual property rights of fictional characters. However, in this study, we take a lighthearted yet rigorous approach to explore an unexpected connection: the correlation between the number of lawyers in the United States and the total likes garnered by the YouTube videos of Simone Giertz, the self-proclaimed queen of shoddy robots. It's time to bring the gavel down on this peculiar pairing and shed some light on whether legal prowess can translate into digital adoration. Let's see if lawyering up can lead to some YouTube "likes brief."
As we embark on this unconventional journey, it is essential to acknowledge the novelty of our subject matter. The juxtaposition of legal professionals and a content creator known for her quirky inventions may seem like a stretch, but as they say, the more eccentric the correlation, the more entertaining the statistical analysis. It's like trying to reconcile the relationship between a judge and a jest - unexpected, but potentially amusing.
Our research aims to saunter through uncharted statistical landscapes to decipher whether there exists a substantial correlation between the number of legal practitioners in the United States and the digital adoration bestowed upon Simone Giertz's inventive endeavors. It's like trying to put a patent on a legal precedent - unexpected, but potentially groundbreaking.
The pursuit of this peculiar correlation led us to wade through vast datasets, combining information on the number of lawyers from the American Bar Association (ABA) with the viral successes of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. It's like a legal case meets a robotic race - unexpected, but potentially captivating.
In the following sections, we present our comprehensive statistical analysis, unveiling a correlation coefficient that left us gasping for breath like a surprised plaintiff when faced with a brilliant courtroom maneuver. Additionally, we evaluate the implications of our findings and reflect on the broader significance of unexpectedly intertwined domains. It's like trying to decipher a legal code with a robotic twist - unexpected, but potentially eye-opening.
So, buckle up for a ride through the unusual terrain where law meets digital adoration - because in this study, legal eagles and Simone's steeple form an unexpectedly captivating correlation. Get ready for an analysis that's as delightful as a court-approved dad joke!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To embark on this peculiar journey of uncovering the correlation between the number of lawyers in the United States and the total likes on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos, our research team had to navigate through a maze of data sources like Indiana Jones looking for lost artifacts, except instead of ancient relics, we were hunting for statistical treasure in the depths of the internet. With our metaphorical fedoras on and bullwhips cracking (metaphorically, of course), we scoured through the American Bar Association (ABA) databases and Simone Giertz's YouTube channel analytics to unearth the gems of information required for this unlikely investigation. It was like trying to find a loophole in a legal contract – convoluted, yet oddly satisfying.
Our data collection spanned from 2014 to 2022, encapsulating a period that witnessed significant changes in both the legal landscape and the evolution of Simone Giertz's whimsical robotic creations. We wanted a comprehensive view of the legal eagles' ascent intertwined with Simone's steeple of likes, much like a legal document that gets longer and longer as it delves into more obscure clauses – complex, but absolutely necessary.
The number of lawyers in the United States was obtained from the meticulous records of the American Bar Association, painstakingly gathered and organized by legal professionals with the same diligence they use to draft legal briefs. We wanted to ensure that our data was as precise as a carefully scripted legal argument – no room for error, only airtight facts.
In parallel, we turned our attention to the captivating world of Simone Giertz's YouTube channel, where we combed through the metrics of total likes on her videos. It was like trying to summarize a deposition into a concise argument – sifting through masses of data to distill the essence of digital adoration.
But our methodology didn't stop at mere data collection – oh no, that would be too easy! To explore the correlation between these seemingly disparate entities, we employed a series of statistical analyses that would make even the most seasoned researcher raise an eyebrow in admiration. We subjected the data to rigorous regression analyses, correlation tests, and other statistical wizardry to extract the sweet nectar of correlation coefficients and p-values. It was like preparing a legal argument with a pinch of charm and a dash of statistical finesse – unexpected, but undeniably effective.
Stay tuned for more surprises as we unleash the results of our groundbreaking analysis in the following sections. It's as thrilling as a dramatic courtroom reveal, but with a refreshing sprinkle of statistical humor – because in this paper, even the data gets to join in on the fun!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Lawyers in the United States and Total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from ABA and YouTube .
For the time period 2014 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9656247, r-squared of 0.9324310, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Legal Eagles and Simone's Steeple: Unraveling the Correlation Between the Number of Lawyers in the United States and Total Likes on Simone Giertz YouTube Videos"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intriguing connection between the number of legal practitioners in the United States and the total likes garnered by the YouTube videos of Simone Giertz, the queen of quirky robotics. Diving into this uncharted territory, we aimed to decipher whether there exists a significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables that has eluded scholars and joke enthusiasts alike. Cue the "lawyer up and likes go up" dad joke!
Utilizing extensive data sourced from the American Bar Association (ABA) and YouTube, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to shed light on this enigmatic linkage. Our findings unveiled a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9656247 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2022, which left our team pleasantly surprised, not unlike when a lawyer successfully tells a joke. Get it? Lawyer jokes?
These results not only illuminate a previously overlooked association between renowned maker and YouTuber Simone Giertz and the legal profession, but also serve as a captivating example of the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated domains. As we forge ahead in understanding the intricacies of this correlation, the findings of this study offer a new perspective on the impact of legal eagles on the realm of YouTube stardom. Stay tuned for more surprising alliances and statistical shenanigans in the world of academia!
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of law and entertainment has long been a topic of scrutiny, with debates ranging from courtroom dramas to the intellectual property rights of fictional characters. However, in this study, we take a lighthearted yet rigorous approach to explore an unexpected connection: the correlation between the number of lawyers in the United States and the total likes garnered by the YouTube videos of Simone Giertz, the self-proclaimed queen of shoddy robots. It's time to bring the gavel down on this peculiar pairing and shed some light on whether legal prowess can translate into digital adoration. Let's see if lawyering up can lead to some YouTube "likes brief."
As we embark on this unconventional journey, it is essential to acknowledge the novelty of our subject matter. The juxtaposition of legal professionals and a content creator known for her quirky inventions may seem like a stretch, but as they say, the more eccentric the correlation, the more entertaining the statistical analysis. It's like trying to reconcile the relationship between a judge and a jest - unexpected, but potentially amusing.
Our research aims to saunter through uncharted statistical landscapes to decipher whether there exists a substantial correlation between the number of legal practitioners in the United States and the digital adoration bestowed upon Simone Giertz's inventive endeavors. It's like trying to put a patent on a legal precedent - unexpected, but potentially groundbreaking.
The pursuit of this peculiar correlation led us to wade through vast datasets, combining information on the number of lawyers from the American Bar Association (ABA) with the viral successes of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. It's like a legal case meets a robotic race - unexpected, but potentially captivating.
In the following sections, we present our comprehensive statistical analysis, unveiling a correlation coefficient that left us gasping for breath like a surprised plaintiff when faced with a brilliant courtroom maneuver. Additionally, we evaluate the implications of our findings and reflect on the broader significance of unexpectedly intertwined domains. It's like trying to decipher a legal code with a robotic twist - unexpected, but potentially eye-opening.
So, buckle up for a ride through the unusual terrain where law meets digital adoration - because in this study, legal eagles and Simone's steeple form an unexpectedly captivating correlation. Get ready for an analysis that's as delightful as a court-approved dad joke!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of lawyers in the United States and the total likes garnered by Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient of 0.9656247 suggests a remarkably robust positive relationship, indicating that as the number of lawyers in the United States increases, the total likes on Simone Giertz's videos also tend to increase. It's the lawyer equivalent of a slam dunk – undeniable and impressive!
The scatterplot presented in Fig. 1 visually captures this strong positive relationship, resembling a case where evidence overwhelmingly supports the plaintiff's claim. You could say the correlation is as clear as a well-written legal brief – it leaves little room for doubt.
With an r-squared value of 0.9324310, we found that a substantial 93.24% of the variation in total likes on Simone Giertz's videos can be explained by the variation in the number of lawyers in the United States. It's as if we've presented an airtight argument in favor of this unexpected correlation – it's compelling and leaves little room for rebuttal.
In addition, the significance level of our findings, with p < 0.01, amplifies the confidence in the observed relationship. This raises the bar, suggesting that the likelihood of this correlation occurring by mere chance is less than 1%, akin to the odds of winning a case with overwhelming evidence. Our findings are more solid than the foundation of a courthouse – it's statistically sound and not easily shaken.
These results provide clear evidence of a surprising connection between the legal profession and the digital stardom of Simone Giertz, uncovering a correlation that prompts further exploration and amusement. It's like discovering a hidden clause in a legal contract – unexpected, but undeniably intriguing.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Lawyers in the United States and Total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"Legal Eagles and Simone's Steeple: Unraveling the Correlation Between the Number of Lawyers in the United States and Total Likes on Simone Giertz YouTube Videos"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intriguing connection between the number of legal practitioners in the United States and the total likes garnered by the YouTube videos of Simone Giertz, the queen of quirky robotics. Diving into this uncharted territory, we aimed to decipher whether there exists a significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables that has eluded scholars and joke enthusiasts alike. Cue the "lawyer up and likes go up" dad joke!
Utilizing extensive data sourced from the American Bar Association (ABA) and YouTube, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to shed light on this enigmatic linkage. Our findings unveiled a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9656247 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2022, which left our team pleasantly surprised, not unlike when a lawyer successfully tells a joke. Get it? Lawyer jokes?
These results not only illuminate a previously overlooked association between renowned maker and YouTuber Simone Giertz and the legal profession, but also serve as a captivating example of the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated domains. As we forge ahead in understanding the intricacies of this correlation, the findings of this study offer a new perspective on the impact of legal eagles on the realm of YouTube stardom. Stay tuned for more surprising alliances and statistical shenanigans in the world of academia!
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their study "The Legal Landscape: A Comprehensive Analysis of Legal Professionals in the United States," Smith et al. delve into the nuanced demographics of the legal profession, examining the distribution of lawyers across different states and practice areas. While their focus lies on the structural composition of the legal workforce, the potential implications of the number of lawyers on digital phenomena remain unexplored. It's like they're meticulously laying the groundwork for a case, only to stumble upon a humorous legal loophole!
Furthermore, Doe's research in "The Evolution of Legal Education in the 21st Century" offers a comprehensive analysis of the changing trends in legal academia and the skill set demanded of future lawyers. However, the unforeseen impact of these evolving legal skills on the realm of YouTube likes remains conspicuously absent from the scope of their investigation. It's like they forgot to cross-examine the potential influence of legal education on digital admiration!
Jones et al., in their work "Legal Ethics in a Global Context," investigate the ethical dilemmas faced by legal professionals in an increasingly interconnected world. While their examination of ethical conundrums is undoubtedly enlightening, the connection between ethical lawyering and the online popularity of Simone Giertz's videos escapes their purview. It's like they're so focused on ethical quandaries that they missed the ethical duty to explore unforeseen correlations in the digital sphere!
Taking a departure from legal literature, the book "Robotic Revolution: How Technology is Shaping Our Future" by Robotics Industry Association provides a comprehensive overview of the growing impact of robotics in various domains. Though not directly related to the legal profession, this insightful work hints at the technological advancements that underpin Simone Giertz's creative endeavors and potential implications for the legal-YouTube likes correlation. It's like a robot lawyer making a compelling case for its relevance in this study!
On the fictional front, Dan Brown's "The Da Vinci Code" weaves a thrilling tale of symbology and cryptic puzzles, drawing readers into a world of hidden connections and unexpected revelations. While the book's plot centers on historical enigmas, the spirit of unraveling mysterious correlations aligns with our endeavor to decode the digital intrigue between lawyers and Simone Giertz's YouTube popularity. It's like we're on the verge of cracking a code that will reveal the legal-da Vinci correlation!
Adding a cinematic touch, "Legally Blonde" and "RoboCop" emerge as tangentially related films that humorously blend legal drama with technological innovation. While the former follows the comedic journey of a law student defying stereotypes, the latter delves into a dystopian future where robotic law enforcement collides with human ethics. These movies, though seemingly unrelated, mirror the unexpected fusion of domains that our study aims to explore. It's like Legally Blonde meets RoboCop in a courtroom where justice is served with a robotic twist!
As we traverse the realms of legal scholarship, fictional narratives, and cinematic portrayals, the uncharted territory of our research opens doors to unexpected parallels and humorous juxtapositions. It's like we're navigating a legal labyrinth, only to stumble upon a robot making dad jokes in the corner!
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of lawyers in the United States and the total likes garnered by Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient of 0.9656247 suggests a remarkably robust positive relationship, indicating that as the number of lawyers in the United States increases, the total likes on Simone Giertz's videos also tend to increase. It's the lawyer equivalent of a slam dunk – undeniable and impressive!
The scatterplot presented in Fig. 1 visually captures this strong positive relationship, resembling a case where evidence overwhelmingly supports the plaintiff's claim. You could say the correlation is as clear as a well-written legal brief – it leaves little room for doubt.
With an r-squared value of 0.9324310, we found that a substantial 93.24% of the variation in total likes on Simone Giertz's videos can be explained by the variation in the number of lawyers in the United States. It's as if we've presented an airtight argument in favor of this unexpected correlation – it's compelling and leaves little room for rebuttal.
In addition, the significance level of our findings, with p < 0.01, amplifies the confidence in the observed relationship. This raises the bar, suggesting that the likelihood of this correlation occurring by mere chance is less than 1%, akin to the odds of winning a case with overwhelming evidence. Our findings are more solid than the foundation of a courthouse – it's statistically sound and not easily shaken.
These results provide clear evidence of a surprising connection between the legal profession and the digital stardom of Simone Giertz, uncovering a correlation that prompts further exploration and amusement. It's like discovering a hidden clause in a legal contract – unexpected, but undeniably intriguing.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The robust correlation unveiled in our study between the number of lawyers in the United States and the total likes garnered by Simone Giertz's YouTube videos reinforces the potential influence of legal professionals on digital phenomena, much like how a good lawyer can influence a jury. Our findings align with the prior research that hinted at the unexpected impact of legal demographics on seemingly unrelated domains, effectively building a case for this unorthodox correlation. It's like the legal version of "RoboCop" meeting the comedic charm of "Legally Blonde" to form an unlikely alliance in the courtroom of statistical evidence!
Smith et al.'s meticulous examination of the structural composition of the legal workforce inadvertently laid the groundwork for uncovering this unforeseen association, akin to preparing a surprise witness in a legal case. Doe's exploration of changing trends in legal academia also sets the stage for understanding the evolving influence of legal education on digital appreciation, revealing an unexpected twist in the narrative of legal scholarship. It's like the legal landscape has suddenly become a captivating story filled with surprising plot twists and statistical cliffhangers!
The staggering correlation coefficient and r-squared value obtained in our study not only substantiate the vividness of this association but also underscore the compelling nature of this unexpected relationship. The statistically significant p-value further solidifies our findings, akin to building a strong legal case with airtight evidence. It's like we've presented a case that even a robot lawyer would find difficult to dismantle!
In the context of practical implications, our results offer new perspectives for those operating at the intersection of law and digital media, highlighting the potential impact of legal professionals on the online popularity of content creators. This unexpected connection underscores the intricate and often humorous linkages that underpin seemingly unrelated domains, leaving us with a scholarly "eureka" moment that rivals the excitement of a legal victory. It's like uncovering a hidden legal clause that leads to an unexpected twist in the legal narrative, all while cracking a dad joke in the sidebar of the courtroom!
As we move forward, our study not only prompts further investigation into the underlying mechanisms driving this correlation but also serves as a delightful departure from traditional research paradigms, injecting a dose of humor and unexpected alliances into the scholarly discourse. It's like a legal symphony performing an unexpected chord progression that leaves the audience both bewildered and pleasantly surprised!
Stay tuned for more statistical shenanigans and scholarly humor as we continue unraveling the enthralling mysteries of obscure correlations in the world of academia and beyond.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Lawyers in the United States and Total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Legal Eagles and Simone's Steeple: Unraveling the Correlation Between the Number of Lawyers in the United States and Total Likes on Simone Giertz YouTube Videos"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the intriguing connection between the number of legal practitioners in the United States and the total likes garnered by the YouTube videos of Simone Giertz, the queen of quirky robotics. Diving into this uncharted territory, we aimed to decipher whether there exists a significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables that has eluded scholars and joke enthusiasts alike. Cue the "lawyer up and likes go up" dad joke!
Utilizing extensive data sourced from the American Bar Association (ABA) and YouTube, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to shed light on this enigmatic linkage. Our findings unveiled a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9656247 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2022, which left our team pleasantly surprised, not unlike when a lawyer successfully tells a joke. Get it? Lawyer jokes?
These results not only illuminate a previously overlooked association between renowned maker and YouTuber Simone Giertz and the legal profession, but also serve as a captivating example of the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated domains. As we forge ahead in understanding the intricacies of this correlation, the findings of this study offer a new perspective on the impact of legal eagles on the realm of YouTube stardom. Stay tuned for more surprising alliances and statistical shenanigans in the world of academia!
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of law and entertainment has long been a topic of scrutiny, with debates ranging from courtroom dramas to the intellectual property rights of fictional characters. However, in this study, we take a lighthearted yet rigorous approach to explore an unexpected connection: the correlation between the number of lawyers in the United States and the total likes garnered by the YouTube videos of Simone Giertz, the self-proclaimed queen of shoddy robots. It's time to bring the gavel down on this peculiar pairing and shed some light on whether legal prowess can translate into digital adoration. Let's see if lawyering up can lead to some YouTube "likes brief."
As we embark on this unconventional journey, it is essential to acknowledge the novelty of our subject matter. The juxtaposition of legal professionals and a content creator known for her quirky inventions may seem like a stretch, but as they say, the more eccentric the correlation, the more entertaining the statistical analysis. It's like trying to reconcile the relationship between a judge and a jest - unexpected, but potentially amusing.
Our research aims to saunter through uncharted statistical landscapes to decipher whether there exists a substantial correlation between the number of legal practitioners in the United States and the digital adoration bestowed upon Simone Giertz's inventive endeavors. It's like trying to put a patent on a legal precedent - unexpected, but potentially groundbreaking.
The pursuit of this peculiar correlation led us to wade through vast datasets, combining information on the number of lawyers from the American Bar Association (ABA) with the viral successes of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. It's like a legal case meets a robotic race - unexpected, but potentially captivating.
In the following sections, we present our comprehensive statistical analysis, unveiling a correlation coefficient that left us gasping for breath like a surprised plaintiff when faced with a brilliant courtroom maneuver. Additionally, we evaluate the implications of our findings and reflect on the broader significance of unexpectedly intertwined domains. It's like trying to decipher a legal code with a robotic twist - unexpected, but potentially eye-opening.
So, buckle up for a ride through the unusual terrain where law meets digital adoration - because in this study, legal eagles and Simone's steeple form an unexpectedly captivating correlation. Get ready for an analysis that's as delightful as a court-approved dad joke!
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of lawyers in the United States and the total likes garnered by Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient of 0.9656247 suggests a remarkably robust positive relationship, indicating that as the number of lawyers in the United States increases, the total likes on Simone Giertz's videos also tend to increase. It's the lawyer equivalent of a slam dunk – undeniable and impressive!
The scatterplot presented in Fig. 1 visually captures this strong positive relationship, resembling a case where evidence overwhelmingly supports the plaintiff's claim. You could say the correlation is as clear as a well-written legal brief – it leaves little room for doubt.
With an r-squared value of 0.9324310, we found that a substantial 93.24% of the variation in total likes on Simone Giertz's videos can be explained by the variation in the number of lawyers in the United States. It's as if we've presented an airtight argument in favor of this unexpected correlation – it's compelling and leaves little room for rebuttal.
In addition, the significance level of our findings, with p < 0.01, amplifies the confidence in the observed relationship. This raises the bar, suggesting that the likelihood of this correlation occurring by mere chance is less than 1%, akin to the odds of winning a case with overwhelming evidence. Our findings are more solid than the foundation of a courthouse – it's statistically sound and not easily shaken.
These results provide clear evidence of a surprising connection between the legal profession and the digital stardom of Simone Giertz, uncovering a correlation that prompts further exploration and amusement. It's like discovering a hidden clause in a legal contract – unexpected, but undeniably intriguing.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
The evidence presented in this study overwhelmingly supports the existence of a robust positive correlation between the number of lawyers in the United States and the total likes garnered by Simone Giertz's YouTube videos. It's as if legal prowess and digital adoration have formed an unbreakable bond, like a good lawyer and a persuasive argument – it's hard to deny.
Our findings indicate that a staggering 93.24% of the variation in Simone Giertz's total likes can be explained by the variation in the number of lawyers in the United States. It's almost as if the legal profession is performing some magic behind the scenes, like a lawyer pulling a rabbit out of a hat – unexpected, but undeniably impressive.
Furthermore, with a significance level of p < 0.01, the likelihood of this correlation occurring by mere chance is less than 1%, akin to the odds of winning a case with overwhelming evidence. It's as if the legal and digital worlds have conspired in a statistically compelling way – it's a legal twist worthy of a courtroom drama.
In light of these results, it's safe to say that the link between legal eagles and Simone's steeple holds strong. It's like the perfect legal argument – convincing, compelling, and supported by overwhelming evidence.
Therefore, we assert with confidence that there is no need for further research in this area. It's like a case with a verdict that's so clear, you can practically hear the judge saying, "Order in the court – no more research needed!"
And with that, we close the case on this unlikely yet captivating correlation. Thank you for joining us on this statistically whimsical journey through the legal and digital realms. Remember, when it comes to legal eagles and YouTube likes, the verdict is in – case closed!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Legal Eagles and Simone's Steeple: Unraveling the Correlation Between the Number of Lawyers in the United States and Total Likes on Simone Giertz YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Legal and Digital Analytics
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Legal Eagles and Simone's Steeple: Unraveling the Correlation Between the Number of Lawyers in the United States and Total Likes on Simone Giertz YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Center for Legal and Zany Analytics
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Legal Eagles and Simone's Steeple: Unraveling the Correlation Between the Number of Lawyers in the United States and Total Likes on Simone Giertz YouTube Videos with an abstract of In this study, we delved into the intriguing connection between the number of legal practitioners in the United States and the total likes garnered by the YouTube videos of Simone Giertz, the queen of quirky robotics. Diving into this uncharted territory, we aimed to decipher whether there exists a significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables that has eluded scholars and joke enthusiasts alike. Cue the "lawyer up and likes go up" dad joke!
Utilizing extensive data sourced from the American Bar Association (ABA) and YouTube, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to shed light on this enigmatic linkage. Our findings unveiled a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9656247 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2014 to 2022, which left our team pleasantly surprised, not unlike when a lawyer successfully tells a joke. Get it? Lawyer jokes?
These results not only illuminate a previously overlooked association between renowned maker and YouTuber Simone Giertz and the legal profession, but also serve as a captivating example of the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated domains. As we forge ahead in understanding the intricacies of this correlation, the findings of this study offer a new perspective on the impact of legal eagles on the realm of YouTube stardom. Stay tuned for more surprising alliances and statistical shenanigans in the world of academia!
ChatGPT:
legal practitioners, lawyers, United States, American Bar Association, YouTube videos, Simone Giertz, robotics, likes, correlation, statistical analysis, p-value, American legal profession, YouTuber prominence
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Number of Lawyers in the United StatesDetailed data title: The Count of ABA Lawyers in the United States
Source: ABA
See what else correlates with Number of Lawyers in the United States
Total likes of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Total likes of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9324310 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total likes of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Number of Lawyers in the United States) over the 9 years from 2014 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.4E-5. 0.0000239771248137935620000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 0.0024% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 41,706 random variables You don't actually need 41 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.84, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
Number of Lawyers in the United States (Lawyers) | 1281430 | 1300700 | 1312870 | 1335960 | 1342380 | 1352080 | 1328740 | 1327910 | 1327010 |
Total likes of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos (Total likes) | 12354 | 194582 | 587220 | 1151920 | 1249920 | 1635230 | 1132060 | 822841 | 700521 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
- Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1281430,1300700,1312870,1335960,1342380,1352080,1328740,1327910,1327010,])
array_2 = np.array([12354,194582,587220,1151920,1249920,1635230,1132060,822841,700521,])
array_1_name = "Number of Lawyers in the United States"
array_2_name = "Total likes of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Number of Lawyers in the United States
- Line chart for only Total likes of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Legal Eagles and Simone's Steeple: Unraveling the Correlation Between the Number of Lawyers in the United States and Total Likes on Simone Giertz YouTube Videos
Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!
Correlation ID: 5497 · Black Variable ID: 542 · Red Variable ID: 25696