about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,483 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How clickbait-y Matt Parker's YouTube video titles are and the second variable is Kerosene used in Switzerland.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of clickbait-y Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles increases, so does the Kerosene used in Switzerland. This is because the excessive use of super catchy titles sparks an unintended sense of competitive FOMO among the Swiss population, leading to impromptu dance parties fueled by kerosene - because who can resist a good ol' mathematical conundrum with a side of pyrotechnics? Remember, with great math puns comes great kerosene consumption!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars', showing the Swiss Alps at night with clickbait-y Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles lighting up the sky. People are gathered below, engaging in impromptu dance parties and participating in math puzzles amidst the fiery glow of the thumbnails. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How clickbait-y Matt Parker's YouTube video titles are and Kerosene used in Switzerland. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Photorealism inspired by bauhaus Magic realism A photo-realistic image An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How clickbait-y Matt Parker's YouTube video titles are and Kerosene used in Switzerland, in the following situation: As the number of clickbait-y Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles increases, so does the Kerosene used in Switzerland. This is because the excessive use of super catchy titles sparks an unintended sense of competitive FOMO among the Swiss population, leading to impromptu dance parties fueled by kerosene - because who can resist a good ol' mathematical conundrum with a side of pyrotechnics? Remember, with great math puns comes great kerosene consumption!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Amidst the Swiss Alps, an increasing number of clickbait-y Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles illuminate the night sky, drawing crowds with promises of mind-bending math puzzles. The air is filled with the smell of kerosene as impromptu dance parties erupt, with people eagerly participating in fiery mathematical conundrums.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' ] and depicting this scene: Amidst the Swiss Alps, an increasing number of clickbait-y Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles illuminate the night sky, drawing crowds with promises of mind-bending math puzzles. The air is filled with the smell of kerosene as impromptu dance parties erupt, with people eagerly participating in fiery mathematical conundrums. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars', showing the Swiss Alps at night with clickbait-y Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles lighting up the sky. People are gathered below, engaging in impromptu dance parties and participating in math puzzles amidst the fiery glow of the thumbnails.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in How clickbait-y Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are positively influenced Kerosene used in Switzerland. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
From Guffaws to Gasoline: The Correlation between Clickbait-y Stand-up Maths Video Titles and Kerosene Consumption in Switzerland

The Journal of Comedic Calculations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are and Kerosene used in Switzerland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8313207 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
From Guffaws to Gasoline: The Correlation between Clickbait-y Stand-up Maths Video Titles and Kerosene Consumption in Switzerland

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a rigorous analysis of the relationship between the clickbait tendencies of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and kerosene consumption in Switzerland. Utilizing data extracted from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration's records of kerosene usage from 2011 to 2022, we sought to explore the subtle dance between mathematical comedy and household fuel preferences. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8313207, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust statistical association between these seemingly disparate phenomena.

While the causal mechanism behind this correlation remains elusive, the implications for the fields of behavioral economics, energy consumption patterns, and even comedic content creation are intriguing. This research not only sheds light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated aspects of modern life, but also adds a touch of humor to the often sober discourse of academic inquiry. So, the next time you're chuckling at a Stand-up Maths video or fueling your kerosene lamp, remember that there might be more to the connection between laughter and lighting than meets the eye!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are and Kerosene used in Switzerland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Guffaws to Gasoline: The Correlation between Clickbait-y Stand-up Maths Video Titles and Kerosene Consumption in Switzerland

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a rigorous analysis of the relationship between the clickbait tendencies of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and kerosene consumption in Switzerland. Utilizing data extracted from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration's records of kerosene usage from 2011 to 2022, we sought to explore the subtle dance between mathematical comedy and household fuel preferences. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8313207, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust statistical association between these seemingly disparate phenomena.

While the causal mechanism behind this correlation remains elusive, the implications for the fields of behavioral economics, energy consumption patterns, and even comedic content creation are intriguing. This research not only sheds light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated aspects of modern life, but also adds a touch of humor to the often sober discourse of academic inquiry. So, the next time you're chuckling at a Stand-up Maths video or fueling your kerosene lamp, remember that there might be more to the connection between laughter and lighting than meets the eye!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of YouTube and mathematical comedy may seem worlds apart from the refined elegance of kerosene consumption, but as our research will elucidate, there may be more to these seemingly disparate subjects than first meets the eye. In the delightful intersection of humor and household fuel preferences lies an intriguing correlation that has captured our attention. With an increasing presence of attention-grabbing, clickbait-y titles in Stand-up Maths videos, we embarked on a quest to uncover the hidden thread that connects these tantalizing titles to the consumption of kerosene, particularly in the picturesque landscapes of Switzerland.

As we delve into this surprising relationship, we do so with a sense of curiosity and a hint of whimsy, for it is not every day that one contemplates the potential link between giggles induced by mathematical humor and the consumption of a flammable hydrocarbon fuel. The pursuit of knowledge often takes unexpected turns, unraveling the intricate web of connections that underlies our everyday experiences. This study aims to probe one such unlikely association, all the while maintaining a scholarly and rigorous approach to our analysis.

Through a careful examination of YouTube video title data and the Energy Information Administration's records, we embarked on an intellectual journey that took us from the realms of mathematical concepts to the subtle nuances of fuel usage patterns. With each step, we encountered not only numerical data but also unexpected insights, prompting us to consider the broader implications of our findings. And as we present the results of this investigation, we do so with a twinkle in our eye, for the correlation we uncovered is as captivating as it is unexpected.

As we venture into the heart of this correlation, let us embrace the spirit of lighthearted inquiry and revel in the joy of discovery, for it is through such unconventional investigations that we may come to appreciate the delightful serendipity that often colors the pursuit of knowledge. So, buckle up for a journey that explores the interplay of mathematics, humor, and household fuel choices in Switzerland, and prepare to see these seemingly incongruous elements in a new, interconnected light.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are and Kerosene used in Switzerland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Guffaws to Gasoline: The Correlation between Clickbait-y Stand-up Maths Video Titles and Kerosene Consumption in Switzerland

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a rigorous analysis of the relationship between the clickbait tendencies of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and kerosene consumption in Switzerland. Utilizing data extracted from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration's records of kerosene usage from 2011 to 2022, we sought to explore the subtle dance between mathematical comedy and household fuel preferences. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8313207, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust statistical association between these seemingly disparate phenomena.

While the causal mechanism behind this correlation remains elusive, the implications for the fields of behavioral economics, energy consumption patterns, and even comedic content creation are intriguing. This research not only sheds light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated aspects of modern life, but also adds a touch of humor to the often sober discourse of academic inquiry. So, the next time you're chuckling at a Stand-up Maths video or fueling your kerosene lamp, remember that there might be more to the connection between laughter and lighting than meets the eye!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of YouTube and mathematical comedy may seem worlds apart from the refined elegance of kerosene consumption, but as our research will elucidate, there may be more to these seemingly disparate subjects than first meets the eye. In the delightful intersection of humor and household fuel preferences lies an intriguing correlation that has captured our attention. With an increasing presence of attention-grabbing, clickbait-y titles in Stand-up Maths videos, we embarked on a quest to uncover the hidden thread that connects these tantalizing titles to the consumption of kerosene, particularly in the picturesque landscapes of Switzerland.
As we delve into this surprising relationship, we do so with a sense of curiosity and a hint of whimsy, for it is not every day that one contemplates the potential link between giggles induced by mathematical humor and the consumption of a flammable hydrocarbon fuel. The pursuit of knowledge often takes unexpected turns, unraveling the intricate web of connections that underlies our everyday experiences. This study aims to probe one such unlikely association, all the while maintaining a scholarly and rigorous approach to our analysis.
Through a careful examination of YouTube video title data and the Energy Information Administration's records, we embarked on an intellectual journey that took us from the realms of mathematical concepts to the subtle nuances of fuel usage patterns. With each step, we encountered not only numerical data but also unexpected insights, prompting us to consider the broader implications of our findings. And as we present the results of this investigation, we do so with a twinkle in our eye, for the correlation we uncovered is as captivating as it is unexpected.
As we venture into the heart of this correlation, let us embrace the spirit of lighthearted inquiry and revel in the joy of discovery, for it is through such unconventional investigations that we may come to appreciate the delightful serendipity that often colors the pursuit of knowledge. So, buckle up for a journey that explores the interplay of mathematics, humor, and household fuel choices in Switzerland, and prepare to see these seemingly incongruous elements in a new, interconnected light.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between clickbait-y titles in online content and seemingly unrelated phenomena has been a source of academic intrigue for decades. Smith (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of clickbait strategies in online media and uncovered their potential impact on viewer engagement. Meanwhile, Doe et al. (2018) delved into the psychology of clickbait and its effects on decision-making processes, offering valuable insights into the subtle art of attention-grabbing headlines.

Expanding beyond the realm of academic journals, several non-fiction books have explored the intersection of humor, mathematics, and human behavior. "Humor and Its Effect on Consumer Decision Making" by Jones (2017) delves into the influence of comedic content on consumer choices, providing a theoretical framework that may shed light on our investigation. Additionally, "Mathematical Marvels: From Calculus to Comedy" by Clarke (2019) presents a lighthearted exploration of mathematical concepts intertwined with comedic elements, offering a potential bridge between mathematical humor and broader societal trends.

On the more imaginative side of the literary spectrum, fictional works such as "The Laughing Equation" by Richardson (2018) have playfully toyed with the idea of humor shaping unexpected aspects of human behavior, inspiring curiosity about the potential influence of mirth on seemingly unrelated phenomena. Similarly, "Kerosene Chronicles" by Murphy (2016) weaves tales of domestic life with the enigmatic allure of kerosene, hinting at the possibility of deeper connections between household fuel preferences and the human psyche.

In the digital landscape, memes such as the "Invisible Math Meme" and the "Kerosene Kerfuffle" have playfully permeated online discourse, offering whimsical glimpses into the pop culture manifestations of mathematical humor and fuel-related anecdotes. While seemingly divergent from scholarly pursuits, these cultural artifacts underscore the pervasive influence of humor and fuel-related topics in contemporary society, hinting at the potential for unexpected correlations.

As our exploration ventures into uncharted territory, we find ourselves surrounded by a tapestry of scholarly investigations, literary musings, and internet oddities, each offering a unique lens through which to contemplate the interconnectedness of our research topics. This array of sources sets the stage for a compelling analysis that balances intellectual rigor with a touch of levity, inviting readers to embark on a delightful journey of inquiry and discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are and Kerosene used in Switzerland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2011 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Guffaws to Gasoline: The Correlation between Clickbait-y Stand-up Maths Video Titles and Kerosene Consumption in Switzerland

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a rigorous analysis of the relationship between the clickbait tendencies of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and kerosene consumption in Switzerland. Utilizing data extracted from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration's records of kerosene usage from 2011 to 2022, we sought to explore the subtle dance between mathematical comedy and household fuel preferences. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8313207, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust statistical association between these seemingly disparate phenomena.

While the causal mechanism behind this correlation remains elusive, the implications for the fields of behavioral economics, energy consumption patterns, and even comedic content creation are intriguing. This research not only sheds light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated aspects of modern life, but also adds a touch of humor to the often sober discourse of academic inquiry. So, the next time you're chuckling at a Stand-up Maths video or fueling your kerosene lamp, remember that there might be more to the connection between laughter and lighting than meets the eye!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of YouTube and mathematical comedy may seem worlds apart from the refined elegance of kerosene consumption, but as our research will elucidate, there may be more to these seemingly disparate subjects than first meets the eye. In the delightful intersection of humor and household fuel preferences lies an intriguing correlation that has captured our attention. With an increasing presence of attention-grabbing, clickbait-y titles in Stand-up Maths videos, we embarked on a quest to uncover the hidden thread that connects these tantalizing titles to the consumption of kerosene, particularly in the picturesque landscapes of Switzerland.
As we delve into this surprising relationship, we do so with a sense of curiosity and a hint of whimsy, for it is not every day that one contemplates the potential link between giggles induced by mathematical humor and the consumption of a flammable hydrocarbon fuel. The pursuit of knowledge often takes unexpected turns, unraveling the intricate web of connections that underlies our everyday experiences. This study aims to probe one such unlikely association, all the while maintaining a scholarly and rigorous approach to our analysis.
Through a careful examination of YouTube video title data and the Energy Information Administration's records, we embarked on an intellectual journey that took us from the realms of mathematical concepts to the subtle nuances of fuel usage patterns. With each step, we encountered not only numerical data but also unexpected insights, prompting us to consider the broader implications of our findings. And as we present the results of this investigation, we do so with a twinkle in our eye, for the correlation we uncovered is as captivating as it is unexpected.
As we venture into the heart of this correlation, let us embrace the spirit of lighthearted inquiry and revel in the joy of discovery, for it is through such unconventional investigations that we may come to appreciate the delightful serendipity that often colors the pursuit of knowledge. So, buckle up for a journey that explores the interplay of mathematics, humor, and household fuel choices in Switzerland, and prepare to see these seemingly incongruous elements in a new, interconnected light.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic connection between the clickbait allure of Stand-up Maths video titles and the seemingly unrelated domain of kerosene usage in Switzerland, we employed a multidimensional approach that blended data mining, statistical analysis, and a dash of good-natured curiosity. Our research team embarked on a whimsical and at times labyrinthine journey to collect, process, and interpret data from a variety of sources, all in the pursuit of shedding light on this intriguing correlation.

The primary source of data for this study was extracted from an extensive analysis of Stand-up Maths video titles using state-of-the-art artificial intelligence algorithms. With a mix of quantitative and qualitative assessments, we meticulously combed through the clickbait-y characteristics of these titles, accounting for factors such as tantalizing language, numerical extravagance, and the subtle art of comedic anticipation. While some may view this as a lighthearted endeavor, the gravity of our task was not lost on us, as we sifted through the digital landscape in search of the elusive patterns that underpin the allure of mathematical humor.

Simultaneously, our research team engaged in a rigorous exploration of kerosene consumption patterns in Switzerland, drawing upon the venerable records of the Energy Information Administration spanning the years 2011 to 2022. Delving into the nuances of household fuel usage, we navigated through the labyrinthine maze of statistical tabulations and consumption trends, all in an effort to capture the subtle dance of kerosene preferences in the alpine nation. The juxtaposition of these disparate datasets may have seemed comical at times, but the quest for knowledge knows no bounds, even if it leads to unexpected intersections.

With the clickbait allure of Stand-up Maths video titles and the steady flow of kerosene usage data in hand, we then dived headfirst into the realm of statistical analysis. Armed with a battalion of correlation coefficients, regression models, and a touch of scholarly whimsy, we sought to uncover the hidden patterns that may lie beneath the surface. Exploring the depths of this mathematical ocean, we navigated through the swirling currents of statistical significance and p-values, all while maintaining a keen eye for the unexpected and the absurd. After all, what is academic inquiry without a hearty sprinkle of good-natured amusement?

In our quest to decode the mysterious bond between mathematical chuckles and household fuel preferences, we reckon with the inherent uncertainty that accompanies such unorthodox investigations. Yet, armed with a symphony of data points, statistical measures, and a generous pinch of levity, we ventured forth to illuminate the unexpected connection that dances between the lines of YouTube titles and the fuel tanks of Switzerland. So, with a salute to the unconventional and a nod to the unexpected, we present the results of our delightful odyssey, where academia meets amusement in a quest for interconnected knowledge.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are and Kerosene used in Switzerland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2011 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8313207, r-squared of 0.6910941, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Guffaws to Gasoline: The Correlation between Clickbait-y Stand-up Maths Video Titles and Kerosene Consumption in Switzerland

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a rigorous analysis of the relationship between the clickbait tendencies of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and kerosene consumption in Switzerland. Utilizing data extracted from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration's records of kerosene usage from 2011 to 2022, we sought to explore the subtle dance between mathematical comedy and household fuel preferences. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8313207, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust statistical association between these seemingly disparate phenomena.

While the causal mechanism behind this correlation remains elusive, the implications for the fields of behavioral economics, energy consumption patterns, and even comedic content creation are intriguing. This research not only sheds light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated aspects of modern life, but also adds a touch of humor to the often sober discourse of academic inquiry. So, the next time you're chuckling at a Stand-up Maths video or fueling your kerosene lamp, remember that there might be more to the connection between laughter and lighting than meets the eye!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of YouTube and mathematical comedy may seem worlds apart from the refined elegance of kerosene consumption, but as our research will elucidate, there may be more to these seemingly disparate subjects than first meets the eye. In the delightful intersection of humor and household fuel preferences lies an intriguing correlation that has captured our attention. With an increasing presence of attention-grabbing, clickbait-y titles in Stand-up Maths videos, we embarked on a quest to uncover the hidden thread that connects these tantalizing titles to the consumption of kerosene, particularly in the picturesque landscapes of Switzerland.
As we delve into this surprising relationship, we do so with a sense of curiosity and a hint of whimsy, for it is not every day that one contemplates the potential link between giggles induced by mathematical humor and the consumption of a flammable hydrocarbon fuel. The pursuit of knowledge often takes unexpected turns, unraveling the intricate web of connections that underlies our everyday experiences. This study aims to probe one such unlikely association, all the while maintaining a scholarly and rigorous approach to our analysis.
Through a careful examination of YouTube video title data and the Energy Information Administration's records, we embarked on an intellectual journey that took us from the realms of mathematical concepts to the subtle nuances of fuel usage patterns. With each step, we encountered not only numerical data but also unexpected insights, prompting us to consider the broader implications of our findings. And as we present the results of this investigation, we do so with a twinkle in our eye, for the correlation we uncovered is as captivating as it is unexpected.
As we venture into the heart of this correlation, let us embrace the spirit of lighthearted inquiry and revel in the joy of discovery, for it is through such unconventional investigations that we may come to appreciate the delightful serendipity that often colors the pursuit of knowledge. So, buckle up for a journey that explores the interplay of mathematics, humor, and household fuel choices in Switzerland, and prepare to see these seemingly incongruous elements in a new, interconnected light.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The empirical analysis of the relationship between the clickbait tendencies of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and kerosene consumption in Switzerland yielded compelling results. Our research revealed a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8313207, indicating a strong positive association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) further underscored the robustness of this relationship, standing at 0.6910941. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the statistical significance of this correlation cannot be overlooked.

Figure 1 provides a visual representation of the correlation, depicting a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the striking alignment between clickbait-y titles and kerosene usage. The scatterplot serves as a testament to the unexpected connections that can emerge from rigorous data analysis, showcasing the intricate dance between comedic allure and household fuel preferences.

This unexpected correlation between the clickbait tendencies of Stand-up Maths video titles and kerosene consumption in Switzerland offers a delightful departure from the traditional understandings of statistical relationships. While one might be inclined to view these findings with a raised eyebrow and a bemused grin, the implications are not to be dismissed lightly. The unanticipated bond between mathematical humor and fuel choice poses intriguing questions about the interplay of human behavior, entertainment, and everyday decisions.

The discovery of this correlation not only contributes to the fields of behavioral economics and energy consumption patterns but also injects a dose of levity into the academic discourse. It raises thought-provoking inquiries about the underlying mechanisms that bind seemingly unrelated elements, prompting us to reconsider the far-reaching ramifications of our daily experiences. This unexpected association invites scholars to approach their inquiries with a sense of whimsy and imagination, recognizing that even the most unlikely pairings may harbor illuminating insights.

As we reflect on the results of our research, it becomes evident that the realm of academic inquiry is not immune to the surprises and chuckles that permeate our everyday lives. The correlation between clickbait-y Stand-up Maths video titles and kerosene usage in Switzerland stands as a testament to the delightful serendipity that can arise from scholarly investigations, offering a timely reminder that statistical analysis is not immune to the occasional punchline. In the grand comedy of life and learning, this correlation adds an unexpected twist to the narrative, reminding us that the intersection of humor and statistics can yield results that are as intriguing as they are entertaining.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are and Kerosene used in Switzerland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
From Guffaws to Gasoline: The Correlation between Clickbait-y Stand-up Maths Video Titles and Kerosene Consumption in Switzerland

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a rigorous analysis of the relationship between the clickbait tendencies of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and kerosene consumption in Switzerland. Utilizing data extracted from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration's records of kerosene usage from 2011 to 2022, we sought to explore the subtle dance between mathematical comedy and household fuel preferences. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8313207, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust statistical association between these seemingly disparate phenomena.

While the causal mechanism behind this correlation remains elusive, the implications for the fields of behavioral economics, energy consumption patterns, and even comedic content creation are intriguing. This research not only sheds light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated aspects of modern life, but also adds a touch of humor to the often sober discourse of academic inquiry. So, the next time you're chuckling at a Stand-up Maths video or fueling your kerosene lamp, remember that there might be more to the connection between laughter and lighting than meets the eye!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between clickbait-y titles in online content and seemingly unrelated phenomena has been a source of academic intrigue for decades. Smith (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of clickbait strategies in online media and uncovered their potential impact on viewer engagement. Meanwhile, Doe et al. (2018) delved into the psychology of clickbait and its effects on decision-making processes, offering valuable insights into the subtle art of attention-grabbing headlines.
Expanding beyond the realm of academic journals, several non-fiction books have explored the intersection of humor, mathematics, and human behavior. "Humor and Its Effect on Consumer Decision Making" by Jones (2017) delves into the influence of comedic content on consumer choices, providing a theoretical framework that may shed light on our investigation. Additionally, "Mathematical Marvels: From Calculus to Comedy" by Clarke (2019) presents a lighthearted exploration of mathematical concepts intertwined with comedic elements, offering a potential bridge between mathematical humor and broader societal trends.
On the more imaginative side of the literary spectrum, fictional works such as "The Laughing Equation" by Richardson (2018) have playfully toyed with the idea of humor shaping unexpected aspects of human behavior, inspiring curiosity about the potential influence of mirth on seemingly unrelated phenomena. Similarly, "Kerosene Chronicles" by Murphy (2016) weaves tales of domestic life with the enigmatic allure of kerosene, hinting at the possibility of deeper connections between household fuel preferences and the human psyche.
In the digital landscape, memes such as the "Invisible Math Meme" and the "Kerosene Kerfuffle" have playfully permeated online discourse, offering whimsical glimpses into the pop culture manifestations of mathematical humor and fuel-related anecdotes. While seemingly divergent from scholarly pursuits, these cultural artifacts underscore the pervasive influence of humor and fuel-related topics in contemporary society, hinting at the potential for unexpected correlations.
As our exploration ventures into uncharted territory, we find ourselves surrounded by a tapestry of scholarly investigations, literary musings, and internet oddities, each offering a unique lens through which to contemplate the interconnectedness of our research topics. This array of sources sets the stage for a compelling analysis that balances intellectual rigor with a touch of levity, inviting readers to embark on a delightful journey of inquiry and discovery.

[[RESULTS]]
The empirical analysis of the relationship between the clickbait tendencies of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and kerosene consumption in Switzerland yielded compelling results. Our research revealed a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8313207, indicating a strong positive association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) further underscored the robustness of this relationship, standing at 0.6910941. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the statistical significance of this correlation cannot be overlooked.
Figure 1 provides a visual representation of the correlation, depicting a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the striking alignment between clickbait-y titles and kerosene usage. The scatterplot serves as a testament to the unexpected connections that can emerge from rigorous data analysis, showcasing the intricate dance between comedic allure and household fuel preferences.
This unexpected correlation between the clickbait tendencies of Stand-up Maths video titles and kerosene consumption in Switzerland offers a delightful departure from the traditional understandings of statistical relationships. While one might be inclined to view these findings with a raised eyebrow and a bemused grin, the implications are not to be dismissed lightly. The unanticipated bond between mathematical humor and fuel choice poses intriguing questions about the interplay of human behavior, entertainment, and everyday decisions.
The discovery of this correlation not only contributes to the fields of behavioral economics and energy consumption patterns but also injects a dose of levity into the academic discourse. It raises thought-provoking inquiries about the underlying mechanisms that bind seemingly unrelated elements, prompting us to reconsider the far-reaching ramifications of our daily experiences. This unexpected association invites scholars to approach their inquiries with a sense of whimsy and imagination, recognizing that even the most unlikely pairings may harbor illuminating insights.
As we reflect on the results of our research, it becomes evident that the realm of academic inquiry is not immune to the surprises and chuckles that permeate our everyday lives. The correlation between clickbait-y Stand-up Maths video titles and kerosene usage in Switzerland stands as a testament to the delightful serendipity that can arise from scholarly investigations, offering a timely reminder that statistical analysis is not immune to the occasional punchline. In the grand comedy of life and learning, this correlation adds an unexpected twist to the narrative, reminding us that the intersection of humor and statistics can yield results that are as intriguing as they are entertaining.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study illuminate an intriguing connection between the clickbait tendencies of Stand-up Maths video titles and kerosene consumption in Switzerland. While on the surface, these two variables may seem as disparate as apples and orangutans, our research highlights their unexpected harmony, much like a well-executed punchline in a comedic performance.

Our results echo the insights gleaned from prior research on the influence of attention-grabbing headlines. Smith's (2015) work, which unraveled the allure of clickbait strategies in online media, offers a compelling backdrop to our findings. Just as a cleverly crafted video title can entice viewer engagement, our study suggests that these tantalizing titles might extend their influence beyond the digital realm, finding resonance in the realm of household fuel choices.

Drawing on the theoretical framework proposed by Jones (2017) in "Humor and Its Effect on Consumer Decision Making," we can discern a parallel between the impact of comedic content on consumer choices and our observed correlation. This parallel underscores the multifaceted influence of humor, stretching its comedic tentacles across domains as varied as mathematical entertainment and domestic energy practices.

Furthermore, the lighthearted exploration of mathematical comedy by Clarke (2019) resonates with our study's revelation of an unexpected link between mathematical humor and kerosene usage. Who would have thought that a chuckle-inducing math video could hold relevance for fuel-related decisions? Clarke's work casts a whimsical light on our serious statistical findings, adding an extra layer of nuance to our understanding of these peculiar correlations.

As we embrace the playful musings of Richardson's (2018) "The Laughing Equation," the subtleties of humor shaping human behavior come to the forefront, teasingly hinting at the potential influence of mirth on seemingly unrelated phenomena. In a similar vein, the "Kerosene Chronicles" by Murphy (2016) offers a tapestry of domestic tales interwoven with the enigmatic allure of kerosene, providing a whimsical hint at the deeper connections between fuel preferences and human inclination. Our study captures this essence, grounding these fanciful narratives in rigorous empirical analysis.

The scatterplot in Figure 1 not only portrays the statistical relationship between Stand-up Maths video titles and kerosene consumption but also serves as a vibrant depiction of the unexpected ties that emerge from our data analysis. In a nod to the "Invisible Math Meme," our findings reveal that even the unseen threads of statistical association can weave a vivid tapestry of insight, bridging the chasm between humor and fuel choices.

Our research contributes an unexpected twist to the narrative of academic inquiry, injecting a touch of levity into the often somber discourse of statistical analysis. After all, who would have thought that the world of mathematical comedy and household fuel preferences would converge with such robust statistical significance? These findings underscore the delightful serendipity that transcends the boundaries of traditional research, reminding us that even in the empirical realm, the unexpected can unfold with the flair of an unexpected punchline.

As we contemplate the whimsical intersection of humor and statistics revealed by our study, we are reminded that academic inquiry, like a well-crafted joke, holds the potential to surprise and delight. Our investigation prompts scholars to take a step back and recognize that even the most seemingly incongruous pairings may hold profound implications, urging us to approach our inquiries with a spirit of curiosity and a readiness to embrace the unexpected with open arms.

The correlation between clickbait-y Stand-up Maths video titles and kerosene usage in Switzerland invites us to navigate the intricate dance between humor and statistics, revealing that, much like a good comedy routine, even the most unlikely pairings may harbor illuminating insights that leave us not just scratching our heads, but also with a knowing smile on our faces. So, let us embrace these peculiar correlations, for in the grand comedy of life and learning, they offer a comedic respite from the rigors of empirical analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are and Kerosene used in Switzerland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
From Guffaws to Gasoline: The Correlation between Clickbait-y Stand-up Maths Video Titles and Kerosene Consumption in Switzerland

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a rigorous analysis of the relationship between the clickbait tendencies of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and kerosene consumption in Switzerland. Utilizing data extracted from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration's records of kerosene usage from 2011 to 2022, we sought to explore the subtle dance between mathematical comedy and household fuel preferences. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8313207, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust statistical association between these seemingly disparate phenomena.

While the causal mechanism behind this correlation remains elusive, the implications for the fields of behavioral economics, energy consumption patterns, and even comedic content creation are intriguing. This research not only sheds light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated aspects of modern life, but also adds a touch of humor to the often sober discourse of academic inquiry. So, the next time you're chuckling at a Stand-up Maths video or fueling your kerosene lamp, remember that there might be more to the connection between laughter and lighting than meets the eye!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of YouTube and mathematical comedy may seem worlds apart from the refined elegance of kerosene consumption, but as our research will elucidate, there may be more to these seemingly disparate subjects than first meets the eye. In the delightful intersection of humor and household fuel preferences lies an intriguing correlation that has captured our attention. With an increasing presence of attention-grabbing, clickbait-y titles in Stand-up Maths videos, we embarked on a quest to uncover the hidden thread that connects these tantalizing titles to the consumption of kerosene, particularly in the picturesque landscapes of Switzerland.
As we delve into this surprising relationship, we do so with a sense of curiosity and a hint of whimsy, for it is not every day that one contemplates the potential link between giggles induced by mathematical humor and the consumption of a flammable hydrocarbon fuel. The pursuit of knowledge often takes unexpected turns, unraveling the intricate web of connections that underlies our everyday experiences. This study aims to probe one such unlikely association, all the while maintaining a scholarly and rigorous approach to our analysis.
Through a careful examination of YouTube video title data and the Energy Information Administration's records, we embarked on an intellectual journey that took us from the realms of mathematical concepts to the subtle nuances of fuel usage patterns. With each step, we encountered not only numerical data but also unexpected insights, prompting us to consider the broader implications of our findings. And as we present the results of this investigation, we do so with a twinkle in our eye, for the correlation we uncovered is as captivating as it is unexpected.
As we venture into the heart of this correlation, let us embrace the spirit of lighthearted inquiry and revel in the joy of discovery, for it is through such unconventional investigations that we may come to appreciate the delightful serendipity that often colors the pursuit of knowledge. So, buckle up for a journey that explores the interplay of mathematics, humor, and household fuel choices in Switzerland, and prepare to see these seemingly incongruous elements in a new, interconnected light.

[[RESULTS]]
The empirical analysis of the relationship between the clickbait tendencies of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and kerosene consumption in Switzerland yielded compelling results. Our research revealed a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8313207, indicating a strong positive association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) further underscored the robustness of this relationship, standing at 0.6910941. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the statistical significance of this correlation cannot be overlooked.
Figure 1 provides a visual representation of the correlation, depicting a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the striking alignment between clickbait-y titles and kerosene usage. The scatterplot serves as a testament to the unexpected connections that can emerge from rigorous data analysis, showcasing the intricate dance between comedic allure and household fuel preferences.
This unexpected correlation between the clickbait tendencies of Stand-up Maths video titles and kerosene consumption in Switzerland offers a delightful departure from the traditional understandings of statistical relationships. While one might be inclined to view these findings with a raised eyebrow and a bemused grin, the implications are not to be dismissed lightly. The unanticipated bond between mathematical humor and fuel choice poses intriguing questions about the interplay of human behavior, entertainment, and everyday decisions.
The discovery of this correlation not only contributes to the fields of behavioral economics and energy consumption patterns but also injects a dose of levity into the academic discourse. It raises thought-provoking inquiries about the underlying mechanisms that bind seemingly unrelated elements, prompting us to reconsider the far-reaching ramifications of our daily experiences. This unexpected association invites scholars to approach their inquiries with a sense of whimsy and imagination, recognizing that even the most unlikely pairings may harbor illuminating insights.
As we reflect on the results of our research, it becomes evident that the realm of academic inquiry is not immune to the surprises and chuckles that permeate our everyday lives. The correlation between clickbait-y Stand-up Maths video titles and kerosene usage in Switzerland stands as a testament to the delightful serendipity that can arise from scholarly investigations, offering a timely reminder that statistical analysis is not immune to the occasional punchline. In the grand comedy of life and learning, this correlation adds an unexpected twist to the narrative, reminding us that the intersection of humor and statistics can yield results that are as intriguing as they are entertaining.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the correlation between clickbait-y Stand-up Maths video titles and kerosene consumption in Switzerland has unveiled a captivating relationship that transcends the boundaries of conventional scholarly inquiry. As we wrap up this illuminating exploration, it is worth acknowledging the unexpected charm that permeates both the world of statistical analysis and the whimsical allure of comedic content creation.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8313207, accompanied by a p-value less than 0.01, speaks to the undeniable bond between mathematical merriment and household fuel preferences. Yet, while we are inclined to revel in the joviality of this discovery, we must also maintain a scholarly composure and recognize the intriguing implications that this correlation holds for the fields of behavioral economics and energy consumption patterns.

As we bid adieu to this captivating correlation, we do so with a nod to the unpredictable nature of academic inquiry and a knowing grin at the delightful surprises that lie just beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated phenomena. The unexpected connection between humor and hydrocarbon, between laughter and lighting, reinforces the notion that scholarly investigation is not devoid of the occasional quirk or twist that injects a touch of levity into the austere corridors of academia.

In the grand tapestry of research, this correlation warrants not only contemplation but also a wry chuckle at the unanticipated associations that illuminate the interconnectedness of our world. And so, with a light-hearted acknowledgement of the whimsical intersections that shape our scholarly pursuits, we assert that no further research is needed in this particular area. After all, sometimes a touch of absurdity is just what the doctor ordered to infuse our academic endeavors with a dash of mirth and amusement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited From Guffaws to Gasoline: The Correlation between Clickbait-y Stand-up Maths Video Titles and Kerosene Consumption in Switzerland. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Comedic Calculations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited From Guffaws to Gasoline: The Correlation between Clickbait-y Stand-up Maths Video Titles and Kerosene Consumption in Switzerland. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Silly Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled From Guffaws to Gasoline: The Correlation between Clickbait-y Stand-up Maths Video Titles and Kerosene Consumption in Switzerland with an abstract of In this paper, we present a rigorous analysis of the relationship between the clickbait tendencies of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles and kerosene consumption in Switzerland. Utilizing data extracted from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and the Energy Information Administration's records of kerosene usage from 2011 to 2022, we sought to explore the subtle dance between mathematical comedy and household fuel preferences. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8313207, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust statistical association between these seemingly disparate phenomena.
While the causal mechanism behind this correlation remains elusive, the implications for the fields of behavioral economics, energy consumption patterns, and even comedic content creation are intriguing. This research not only sheds light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated aspects of modern life, but also adds a touch of humor to the often sober discourse of academic inquiry. So, the next time you're chuckling at a Stand-up Maths video or fueling your kerosene lamp, remember that there might be more to the connection between laughter and lighting than meets the eye!

ChatGPT:

stand-up maths, YouTube video titles, clickbait, kerosene consumption, Switzerland, correlation, statistical analysis, AI analysis, energy consumption, behavioral economics, comedic content creation, household fuel preferences, Energy Information Administration, mathematical comedy, academic inquiry

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How clickbait-y Matt Parker's YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How clickbait-y Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of Stand-up Maths YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How clickbait-y Matt Parker's YouTube video titles are

Kerosene used in Switzerland
Detailed data title: Volume of kerosene used consumed in Switzerland in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Kerosene used in Switzerland

Correlation r = 0.8313207 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6910941 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 69.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Kerosene used in Switzerland) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How clickbait-y Matt Parker's YouTube video titles are) over the 12 years from 2011 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.000804. 0.0008042518863928253000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 0.0804% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,243 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.49, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
How clickbait-y Matt Parker's YouTube video titles are (Clickbait-y score)4.66676.333353.53.754.20414.33333.91674.13794.22865.324.8947
Kerosene used in Switzerland (Million Barrels/Day)0.0328770.0655740.0328770.0328770.0328770.0327870.0328770.0328770.0328770.0437160.0538920.047904




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.6667,6.3333,5,3.5,3.75,4.2041,4.3333,3.9167,4.1379,4.2286,5.32,4.8947,])
array_2 = np.array([0.032877,0.065574,0.032877,0.032877,0.032877,0.032787,0.032877,0.032877,0.032877,0.043716,0.053892,0.047904,])
array_1_name = "How clickbait-y Matt Parker's YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Kerosene used in Switzerland"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 5483 · Black Variable ID: 25803 · Red Variable ID: 24960
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0