about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,450 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland and the second variable is Biomass power generated in Taiwan.  The chart goes from 1989 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more Republican votes in Maryland were cast, the collective support somehow resonated across the ocean to Taiwan, energizing the biomass power production there. Perhaps there's a new form of political-electric energy at play! "Who knew political votes could have a power-ful impact abroad?"

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a quaint Maryland town with a line of voter casting their ballots at the polling station under clear blue skies. Show the proud voters in the Woodblock painting style and include the Republican Presidential candidate's logos or symbols. Then, depict the landscape transitioning to a sprawling biomass power plant in Taiwan, with vibrant energy emanating from the machinery. The scene should have an old-world charm and be rich in detail, capturing the surprising connection between the two distant locations in a beautiful and mesmerizing way. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland and Biomass power generated in Taiwan. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute cartoon Vaporwave Woodblock painting Sci-fi fantacy Woodblock painting
ChatGPT: Woodblock painting

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland and Biomass power generated in Taiwan, in the following situation: As more Republican votes in Maryland were cast, the collective support somehow resonated across the ocean to Taiwan, energizing the biomass power production there. Perhaps there's a new form of political-electric energy at play! "Who knew political votes could have a power-ful impact abroad?". Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a quaint Maryland town, voters lined up at the polling station under clear blue skies, proudly casting their ballots for the Republican Presidential candidate. As the Republican votes accumulated, a wave of energy surged across the seas, arriving at a sprawling biomass power plant in Taiwan. The machinery hummed with increased vigor, sending a lively, crackling energy into the air. It seemed as though the collective support from Maryland had ignited a newfound source of political-electric energy, connecting the two distant locations in a surprising display of influence.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Woodblock painting ] and depicting this scene: In a quaint Maryland town, voters lined up at the polling station under clear blue skies, proudly casting their ballots for the Republican Presidential candidate. As the Republican votes accumulated, a wave of energy surged across the seas, arriving at a sprawling biomass power plant in Taiwan. The machinery hummed with increased vigor, sending a lively, crackling energy into the air. It seemed as though the collective support from Maryland had ignited a newfound source of political-electric energy, connecting the two distant locations in a surprising display of influence. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a quaint Maryland town with a line of voter casting their ballots at the polling station under clear blue skies. Show the proud voters in the Woodblock painting style and include the Republican Presidential candidate's logos or symbols. Then, depict the landscape transitioning to a sprawling biomass power plant in Taiwan, with vibrant energy emanating from the machinery. The scene should have an old-world charm and be rich in detail, capturing the surprising connection between the two distant locations in a beautiful and mesmerizing way.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland caused Biomass power generated in Taiwan to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
From the Old Line State to the Biomass Burn: Analyzing the Surprising Correlation Between Republican Presidential Votes in Maryland and Biomass Power Generation in Taiwan

Journal of Ecological Politics and Cross-Cultural Energy Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland and Biomass power generated in Taiwan. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9656699 and p < 0.01 for 1989 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"From the Old Line State to the Biomass Burn: Analyzing the Surprising Correlation Between Republican Presidential Votes in Maryland and Biomass Power Generation in Taiwan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the unexpected findings of our study on the relationship between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of Maryland and the amount of biomass power generated in Taiwan. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to shed light on this curious connection. Our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9656699 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1989 to 2020. It appears that Maryland's political leanings and Taiwan's renewable energy production share a curious bond – some might even call it a "republican-tree relationship"! Our findings suggest that there may be a deeper interdependence between international political trends and environmental practices than previously realized. As the old saying goes, "When it comes to political influence on global energy, it's all about the elephant (party) in the room!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland and Biomass power generated in Taiwan. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From the Old Line State to the Biomass Burn: Analyzing the Surprising Correlation Between Republican Presidential Votes in Maryland and Biomass Power Generation in Taiwan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the unexpected findings of our study on the relationship between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of Maryland and the amount of biomass power generated in Taiwan. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to shed light on this curious connection. Our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9656699 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1989 to 2020. It appears that Maryland's political leanings and Taiwan's renewable energy production share a curious bond – some might even call it a "republican-tree relationship"! Our findings suggest that there may be a deeper interdependence between international political trends and environmental practices than previously realized. As the old saying goes, "When it comes to political influence on global energy, it's all about the elephant (party) in the room!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the political landscape continues to shape global policies and agendas, it is important to explore the unlikeliest of connections between seemingly unrelated entities. In this vein, our research sought to investigate the obscure link between political voting patterns in Maryland and the production of biomass power in Taiwan. Who would have thought that ballot boxes in Baltimore and biomass burners in Taiwan could be intertwined in an unexpected dance of shared destiny? As our findings unravel, you'll see that there's more to this unlikely duo than meets the eye – talk about a "grand old party" playing a role in "fueling" renewable energy sources!

The landscape of political decision-making can often seem as murky as a foggy day in the Chesapeake Bay, but our study aimed to shed light on a rather "biomassive" correlation between voting behavior and energy practices. The surprising convergence of these seemingly disparate variables has left us scratching our heads in a classic case of "Republican candidates in Maryland turn votes into volts across the Pacific"! Who knew that the red, white, and blue in Maryland and the green, brown, and eco-friendly in Taiwan could find themselves in such a cosmic tango of interconnectedness?

While the connection between political preferences and renewable energy production may not seem obvious at first glance, our research uncovered a correlation coefficient that is stronger than the gravitational pull of a black hole - a "republican-tree" partnership made in statistical heaven! This revelation introduces a whole new dimension to the adage, "As Maryland goes, so goes Taiwan's biomass power" - a phrase seldom uttered in the hallowed halls of political and environmental discourse.

Stay tuned as we unravel the captivating mystery behind this unexpected entwining of political inclinations and sustainable energy practices. As we delve deeper into our findings, you'll come to realize that "when political leanings and global energy production join hands, it's not just a tug-of-war, but a renewable tug-of-watts!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland and Biomass power generated in Taiwan. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From the Old Line State to the Biomass Burn: Analyzing the Surprising Correlation Between Republican Presidential Votes in Maryland and Biomass Power Generation in Taiwan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the unexpected findings of our study on the relationship between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of Maryland and the amount of biomass power generated in Taiwan. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to shed light on this curious connection. Our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9656699 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1989 to 2020. It appears that Maryland's political leanings and Taiwan's renewable energy production share a curious bond – some might even call it a "republican-tree relationship"! Our findings suggest that there may be a deeper interdependence between international political trends and environmental practices than previously realized. As the old saying goes, "When it comes to political influence on global energy, it's all about the elephant (party) in the room!"

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the political landscape continues to shape global policies and agendas, it is important to explore the unlikeliest of connections between seemingly unrelated entities. In this vein, our research sought to investigate the obscure link between political voting patterns in Maryland and the production of biomass power in Taiwan. Who would have thought that ballot boxes in Baltimore and biomass burners in Taiwan could be intertwined in an unexpected dance of shared destiny? As our findings unravel, you'll see that there's more to this unlikely duo than meets the eye – talk about a "grand old party" playing a role in "fueling" renewable energy sources!
The landscape of political decision-making can often seem as murky as a foggy day in the Chesapeake Bay, but our study aimed to shed light on a rather "biomassive" correlation between voting behavior and energy practices. The surprising convergence of these seemingly disparate variables has left us scratching our heads in a classic case of "Republican candidates in Maryland turn votes into volts across the Pacific"! Who knew that the red, white, and blue in Maryland and the green, brown, and eco-friendly in Taiwan could find themselves in such a cosmic tango of interconnectedness?
While the connection between political preferences and renewable energy production may not seem obvious at first glance, our research uncovered a correlation coefficient that is stronger than the gravitational pull of a black hole - a "republican-tree" partnership made in statistical heaven! This revelation introduces a whole new dimension to the adage, "As Maryland goes, so goes Taiwan's biomass power" - a phrase seldom uttered in the hallowed halls of political and environmental discourse.
Stay tuned as we unravel the captivating mystery behind this unexpected entwining of political inclinations and sustainable energy practices. As we delve deeper into our findings, you'll come to realize that "when political leanings and global energy production join hands, it's not just a tug-of-war, but a renewable tug-of-watts!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The interplay between political voting patterns and environmental practices has long been a subject of intrigue and speculation. Smith and Doe (2015) delved into the complexities of political influence on renewable energy, shedding light on the nuanced relationship between policy decisions and sustainable practices. However, the unexpected link between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Maryland and the production of biomass power in Taiwan has remained largely unexplored in the academic literature – until now.

In "Green Revolution: The Impact of Political Decisions on Renewable Energy," Smith and Doe (2015) examined the intricate web of political and environmental factors that shape energy production. However, their work did not uncover the remarkable correlation that we have observed in our own study. It seems that when it comes to global energy interdependence, there's a whole new chapter to be written – perhaps we could call it "The Republic of Biomass"!

Jones (2018) also contributed valuable insights into the association between political landscapes and renewable energy practices in "Eco-Politics: Navigating the Green Frontier." Yet, their research failed to capture the peculiar connection that we have unearthed between Maryland's Republican leanings and Taiwan's biomass power generation. It's clear that our study has broken new ground – or should we say, "bio-massive ground" – in uncovering this unexpected relationship.

Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Republican War on Science" by Chris Mooney (2006) raises thought-provoking questions about the intersection of political ideologies and scientific endeavors. While Mooney's book primarily focuses on domestic policy, one can't help but wonder: could there be a transpacific ripple effect at play here? It's as if the red-state/blue-state divide has taken on a whole new dimension – quite literally, spanning across continents!

On the lighter side of the spectrum, "The Girl with the Dragon Biomass" by Stieg Larsson (2005) weaves a riveting tale of political intrigue and renewable energy schemes. Though a work of fiction, the novel's exploration of power struggles and environmental agendas resonates with our own research findings. Who knew that the political drama in Maryland could find its echo in the world of biomass burners in Taiwan? It's almost as if renewable energy and political drama have intertwined in a dance as intricate as the cha-cha-cha-chesapeake!

Furthermore, social media posts have contributed to the discourse surrounding our unexpected findings. One tweet read, "Who would've thought that Republicans in Maryland had a stake in Taiwan's biomass power? Talk about a 'red wave' turning into a 'green revolution' – it's like politics and renewables are doing the hokey pokey together!" This quip encapsulates the sheer incredulity that many have expressed upon learning about the curious correlation we've uncovered. It seems that when it comes to the interplay of political persuasions and environmental practices, there's more than meets the eye – or should we say, "biomass"!

As we continue to unravel the enigmatic relationship between political votes and renewable energy across international borders, it's evident that this "republican-tree relationship" is not just a statistical anomaly, but a comedic gold mine! Who knew that the old saying "politicians blowing hot air" could take on a whole new meaning in the world of renewable energy – it's a veritable comedy of errors, or should we say, "comedy of bio-manners"!



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland and Biomass power generated in Taiwan. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1989 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From the Old Line State to the Biomass Burn: Analyzing the Surprising Correlation Between Republican Presidential Votes in Maryland and Biomass Power Generation in Taiwan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the unexpected findings of our study on the relationship between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of Maryland and the amount of biomass power generated in Taiwan. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to shed light on this curious connection. Our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9656699 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1989 to 2020. It appears that Maryland's political leanings and Taiwan's renewable energy production share a curious bond – some might even call it a "republican-tree relationship"! Our findings suggest that there may be a deeper interdependence between international political trends and environmental practices than previously realized. As the old saying goes, "When it comes to political influence on global energy, it's all about the elephant (party) in the room!"

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the political landscape continues to shape global policies and agendas, it is important to explore the unlikeliest of connections between seemingly unrelated entities. In this vein, our research sought to investigate the obscure link between political voting patterns in Maryland and the production of biomass power in Taiwan. Who would have thought that ballot boxes in Baltimore and biomass burners in Taiwan could be intertwined in an unexpected dance of shared destiny? As our findings unravel, you'll see that there's more to this unlikely duo than meets the eye – talk about a "grand old party" playing a role in "fueling" renewable energy sources!
The landscape of political decision-making can often seem as murky as a foggy day in the Chesapeake Bay, but our study aimed to shed light on a rather "biomassive" correlation between voting behavior and energy practices. The surprising convergence of these seemingly disparate variables has left us scratching our heads in a classic case of "Republican candidates in Maryland turn votes into volts across the Pacific"! Who knew that the red, white, and blue in Maryland and the green, brown, and eco-friendly in Taiwan could find themselves in such a cosmic tango of interconnectedness?
While the connection between political preferences and renewable energy production may not seem obvious at first glance, our research uncovered a correlation coefficient that is stronger than the gravitational pull of a black hole - a "republican-tree" partnership made in statistical heaven! This revelation introduces a whole new dimension to the adage, "As Maryland goes, so goes Taiwan's biomass power" - a phrase seldom uttered in the hallowed halls of political and environmental discourse.
Stay tuned as we unravel the captivating mystery behind this unexpected entwining of political inclinations and sustainable energy practices. As we delve deeper into our findings, you'll come to realize that "when political leanings and global energy production join hands, it's not just a tug-of-war, but a renewable tug-of-watts!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic nexus between voting behavior in Maryland and biomass power generation in Taiwan, our research team employed a multidisciplinary approach that would make even the most seasoned political scientist scratch their head in bewildered awe. The methodology used in this study involved a combination of data collection, statistical analysis, and a pinch of good old-fashioned detective work – because what's a good research project without a touch of mystery?

First, we scoured the digital depths of the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, casting our net far and wide to capture the assorted datasets from 1989 to 2020. It was a bit like a digital treasure hunt, but instead of gold, we were after data nuggets - talk about "panning for political and power metrics" in the vast ocean of cyberspace!

After amassing this trove of information, we then put on our statistical thinking caps and dove headfirst into the world of correlation analytics. With the precision of a master carpenter crafting a fine piece of furniture, we meticulously calculated the correlation coefficient and p-value using a series of robust statistical models. While some might say it was akin to finding a needle in a haystack, we saw it as more of a statistical safari - navigating through the wilds of data to uncover the hidden gems of correlation. It's all about channeling your inner data sleuth - "Sherlock Holmes meets the statistical hypothesis!"

Furthermore, to ensure the reliability and validity of our findings, we conducted sensitivity analyses and cross-validation techniques to confirm the robustness of the observed relationship. This step was crucial to ensure that our correlation was not just a statistical fluke or a chance alignment of numbers – after all, in the world of research, we want our correlations to be as solid as an oak tree or as sturdy as a well-constructed podium at a political rally. It's all about ensuring that our findings have the firm "statistical bark" to withstand the scrutiny of the academic forest!

In addition to the statistical methods employed, we also delved into qualitative analyses, tapping into the collective wisdom of experts in both the political and energy arenas. Through interviews and discussions with seasoned professionals, we sought to gain a deeper understanding of the socio-political and environmental factors that could underpin the observed correlation. It was a bit like unraveling a complex enigma, where every insight was a piece of the puzzle, slowly coming together to reveal the bigger picture - a real-life "researchers' pyramid scheme" of information gathering!

In summary, our research methodology blended quantitative and qualitative approaches in a delightful cocktail of data wrangling, statistical finagling, and expert insights - a methodological concoction that could rival even the most intricate Swiss clock or the most elaborate Rube Goldberg machine. The end result? A robust and holistic analysis that uncovers the captivating dance of Republican votes in Maryland and biomass power generation in Taiwan, leaving us with nothing but a profound "republican-tree relationship" to ponder!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland and Biomass power generated in Taiwan. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1989 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9656699, r-squared of 0.9325184, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From the Old Line State to the Biomass Burn: Analyzing the Surprising Correlation Between Republican Presidential Votes in Maryland and Biomass Power Generation in Taiwan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the unexpected findings of our study on the relationship between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of Maryland and the amount of biomass power generated in Taiwan. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to shed light on this curious connection. Our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9656699 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1989 to 2020. It appears that Maryland's political leanings and Taiwan's renewable energy production share a curious bond – some might even call it a "republican-tree relationship"! Our findings suggest that there may be a deeper interdependence between international political trends and environmental practices than previously realized. As the old saying goes, "When it comes to political influence on global energy, it's all about the elephant (party) in the room!"

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the political landscape continues to shape global policies and agendas, it is important to explore the unlikeliest of connections between seemingly unrelated entities. In this vein, our research sought to investigate the obscure link between political voting patterns in Maryland and the production of biomass power in Taiwan. Who would have thought that ballot boxes in Baltimore and biomass burners in Taiwan could be intertwined in an unexpected dance of shared destiny? As our findings unravel, you'll see that there's more to this unlikely duo than meets the eye – talk about a "grand old party" playing a role in "fueling" renewable energy sources!
The landscape of political decision-making can often seem as murky as a foggy day in the Chesapeake Bay, but our study aimed to shed light on a rather "biomassive" correlation between voting behavior and energy practices. The surprising convergence of these seemingly disparate variables has left us scratching our heads in a classic case of "Republican candidates in Maryland turn votes into volts across the Pacific"! Who knew that the red, white, and blue in Maryland and the green, brown, and eco-friendly in Taiwan could find themselves in such a cosmic tango of interconnectedness?
While the connection between political preferences and renewable energy production may not seem obvious at first glance, our research uncovered a correlation coefficient that is stronger than the gravitational pull of a black hole - a "republican-tree" partnership made in statistical heaven! This revelation introduces a whole new dimension to the adage, "As Maryland goes, so goes Taiwan's biomass power" - a phrase seldom uttered in the hallowed halls of political and environmental discourse.
Stay tuned as we unravel the captivating mystery behind this unexpected entwining of political inclinations and sustainable energy practices. As we delve deeper into our findings, you'll come to realize that "when political leanings and global energy production join hands, it's not just a tug-of-war, but a renewable tug-of-watts!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation of 0.9656699 between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Maryland and the amount of biomass power generated in Taiwan for the years 1989 to 2020. The high correlation coefficient suggests a strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, leaving us to ponder whether there's a "trump card" at play in influencing Taiwan's biomass power production.

Further bolstering the significance of our findings, the r-squared value of 0.9325184 indicates that over 93% of the variability in Taiwan's biomass power generation can be explained by the variation in Republican votes in Maryland. We couldn't help but chuckle at the thought of this unexpected duo being practically "biobuoyant" in their shared journey through the annals of statistical inference.

The statistical significance, with a p-value of less than 0.01, underscores the robustness of the observed relationship. As we gaze upon the scatterplot (Fig. 1), it becomes abundantly clear that these variables are not just dancing to the beat of their own drummers, but engaging in a synchronized "biopartisan" ballet of sorts.

In summary, our results defy conventional wisdom and highlight the intriguing entanglement of domestic political dynamics and global environmental practices. It seems that in the realm of statistical quirks, the "elephant in the room" extends its trunk all the way to the "bamboo" burners of Taiwan!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland and Biomass power generated in Taiwan. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"From the Old Line State to the Biomass Burn: Analyzing the Surprising Correlation Between Republican Presidential Votes in Maryland and Biomass Power Generation in Taiwan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the unexpected findings of our study on the relationship between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of Maryland and the amount of biomass power generated in Taiwan. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to shed light on this curious connection. Our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9656699 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1989 to 2020. It appears that Maryland's political leanings and Taiwan's renewable energy production share a curious bond – some might even call it a "republican-tree relationship"! Our findings suggest that there may be a deeper interdependence between international political trends and environmental practices than previously realized. As the old saying goes, "When it comes to political influence on global energy, it's all about the elephant (party) in the room!"

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The interplay between political voting patterns and environmental practices has long been a subject of intrigue and speculation. Smith and Doe (2015) delved into the complexities of political influence on renewable energy, shedding light on the nuanced relationship between policy decisions and sustainable practices. However, the unexpected link between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Maryland and the production of biomass power in Taiwan has remained largely unexplored in the academic literature – until now.
In "Green Revolution: The Impact of Political Decisions on Renewable Energy," Smith and Doe (2015) examined the intricate web of political and environmental factors that shape energy production. However, their work did not uncover the remarkable correlation that we have observed in our own study. It seems that when it comes to global energy interdependence, there's a whole new chapter to be written – perhaps we could call it "The Republic of Biomass"!
Jones (2018) also contributed valuable insights into the association between political landscapes and renewable energy practices in "Eco-Politics: Navigating the Green Frontier." Yet, their research failed to capture the peculiar connection that we have unearthed between Maryland's Republican leanings and Taiwan's biomass power generation. It's clear that our study has broken new ground – or should we say, "bio-massive ground" – in uncovering this unexpected relationship.
Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Republican War on Science" by Chris Mooney (2006) raises thought-provoking questions about the intersection of political ideologies and scientific endeavors. While Mooney's book primarily focuses on domestic policy, one can't help but wonder: could there be a transpacific ripple effect at play here? It's as if the red-state/blue-state divide has taken on a whole new dimension – quite literally, spanning across continents!
On the lighter side of the spectrum, "The Girl with the Dragon Biomass" by Stieg Larsson (2005) weaves a riveting tale of political intrigue and renewable energy schemes. Though a work of fiction, the novel's exploration of power struggles and environmental agendas resonates with our own research findings. Who knew that the political drama in Maryland could find its echo in the world of biomass burners in Taiwan? It's almost as if renewable energy and political drama have intertwined in a dance as intricate as the cha-cha-cha-chesapeake!
Furthermore, social media posts have contributed to the discourse surrounding our unexpected findings. One tweet read, "Who would've thought that Republicans in Maryland had a stake in Taiwan's biomass power? Talk about a 'red wave' turning into a 'green revolution' – it's like politics and renewables are doing the hokey pokey together!" This quip encapsulates the sheer incredulity that many have expressed upon learning about the curious correlation we've uncovered. It seems that when it comes to the interplay of political persuasions and environmental practices, there's more than meets the eye – or should we say, "biomass"!
As we continue to unravel the enigmatic relationship between political votes and renewable energy across international borders, it's evident that this "republican-tree relationship" is not just a statistical anomaly, but a comedic gold mine! Who knew that the old saying "politicians blowing hot air" could take on a whole new meaning in the world of renewable energy – it's a veritable comedy of errors, or should we say, "comedy of bio-manners"!


[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation of 0.9656699 between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Maryland and the amount of biomass power generated in Taiwan for the years 1989 to 2020. The high correlation coefficient suggests a strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, leaving us to ponder whether there's a "trump card" at play in influencing Taiwan's biomass power production.
Further bolstering the significance of our findings, the r-squared value of 0.9325184 indicates that over 93% of the variability in Taiwan's biomass power generation can be explained by the variation in Republican votes in Maryland. We couldn't help but chuckle at the thought of this unexpected duo being practically "biobuoyant" in their shared journey through the annals of statistical inference.
The statistical significance, with a p-value of less than 0.01, underscores the robustness of the observed relationship. As we gaze upon the scatterplot (Fig. 1), it becomes abundantly clear that these variables are not just dancing to the beat of their own drummers, but engaging in a synchronized "biopartisan" ballet of sorts.
In summary, our results defy conventional wisdom and highlight the intriguing entanglement of domestic political dynamics and global environmental practices. It seems that in the realm of statistical quirks, the "elephant in the room" extends its trunk all the way to the "bamboo" burners of Taiwan!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has unearthed a remarkable relationship between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Maryland and the amount of biomass power generated in Taiwan that demands further investigation. The substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9656699 and the high r-squared value of 0.9325184 attest to the robustness and magnitude of this association. Our findings support prior research suggesting that political decisions can have a tangible impact on renewable energy practices, shedding light on the intricate dance of international politics and environmental technologies.

The "republican-tree relationship" we've uncovered is a veritable enigma - so much so that it’s enough to make you paws and reflect on the political and environmental tapestry that spans continents. This unexpected connection may seem like a "trump" card in the world of renewable energy, but it speaks to the vast potential for cross-border influence on sustainable practices. Our study has turned a new leaf in the discourse on political and environmental interplay, and has added an unexpected twist to our understanding of global energy systems. It's as if Maryland Republicans and Taiwanese biomass power generators are engaging in a transpacific tango of influence, waltzing to the tune of red-state politics and green energy endeavours.

Our results underscore the importance of considering international political dynamics when examining global energy patterns, and they highlight the need for a deeper exploration of the potential mechanisms underpinning this "republican-tree relationship". As the saying goes, "A correlation this strong can hardly be coincidental – it's like politics and biomass are in a committed 'republican-tree' relationship!"

The statistical significance of our findings, with a p-value of less than 0.01, further emphasizes the depth and breadth of this unexpected connection. The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually captures the synchronized dance of these seemingly unrelated variables, demonstrating that when it comes to the interplay of political persuasions and environmental practices, there's more than meets the eye – or should we say, "biomass"!

In conclusion, our study has broken new ground in uncovering this unexpected relationship, and it has given rise to a burgeoning field of inquiry that could bridge the gap between political landscapes and renewable energy practices. Our findings challenge conventional wisdom and invite further research into the mechanisms that drive this cross-continental correlation. This unexpected revelation is not just a statistical anomaly, but a spark of insight that illuminates the interconnected web of global energy dynamics. It's almost as if the "republican-tree relationship" holds the key to a whole new chapter in understanding the influence of political decisions on environmental practices – a tale as surprising as a dad joke in an academic paper!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland and Biomass power generated in Taiwan. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"From the Old Line State to the Biomass Burn: Analyzing the Surprising Correlation Between Republican Presidential Votes in Maryland and Biomass Power Generation in Taiwan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the unexpected findings of our study on the relationship between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of Maryland and the amount of biomass power generated in Taiwan. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to shed light on this curious connection. Our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9656699 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1989 to 2020. It appears that Maryland's political leanings and Taiwan's renewable energy production share a curious bond – some might even call it a "republican-tree relationship"! Our findings suggest that there may be a deeper interdependence between international political trends and environmental practices than previously realized. As the old saying goes, "When it comes to political influence on global energy, it's all about the elephant (party) in the room!"

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the political landscape continues to shape global policies and agendas, it is important to explore the unlikeliest of connections between seemingly unrelated entities. In this vein, our research sought to investigate the obscure link between political voting patterns in Maryland and the production of biomass power in Taiwan. Who would have thought that ballot boxes in Baltimore and biomass burners in Taiwan could be intertwined in an unexpected dance of shared destiny? As our findings unravel, you'll see that there's more to this unlikely duo than meets the eye – talk about a "grand old party" playing a role in "fueling" renewable energy sources!
The landscape of political decision-making can often seem as murky as a foggy day in the Chesapeake Bay, but our study aimed to shed light on a rather "biomassive" correlation between voting behavior and energy practices. The surprising convergence of these seemingly disparate variables has left us scratching our heads in a classic case of "Republican candidates in Maryland turn votes into volts across the Pacific"! Who knew that the red, white, and blue in Maryland and the green, brown, and eco-friendly in Taiwan could find themselves in such a cosmic tango of interconnectedness?
While the connection between political preferences and renewable energy production may not seem obvious at first glance, our research uncovered a correlation coefficient that is stronger than the gravitational pull of a black hole - a "republican-tree" partnership made in statistical heaven! This revelation introduces a whole new dimension to the adage, "As Maryland goes, so goes Taiwan's biomass power" - a phrase seldom uttered in the hallowed halls of political and environmental discourse.
Stay tuned as we unravel the captivating mystery behind this unexpected entwining of political inclinations and sustainable energy practices. As we delve deeper into our findings, you'll come to realize that "when political leanings and global energy production join hands, it's not just a tug-of-war, but a renewable tug-of-watts!"

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation of 0.9656699 between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in Maryland and the amount of biomass power generated in Taiwan for the years 1989 to 2020. The high correlation coefficient suggests a strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, leaving us to ponder whether there's a "trump card" at play in influencing Taiwan's biomass power production.
Further bolstering the significance of our findings, the r-squared value of 0.9325184 indicates that over 93% of the variability in Taiwan's biomass power generation can be explained by the variation in Republican votes in Maryland. We couldn't help but chuckle at the thought of this unexpected duo being practically "biobuoyant" in their shared journey through the annals of statistical inference.
The statistical significance, with a p-value of less than 0.01, underscores the robustness of the observed relationship. As we gaze upon the scatterplot (Fig. 1), it becomes abundantly clear that these variables are not just dancing to the beat of their own drummers, but engaging in a synchronized "biopartisan" ballet of sorts.
In summary, our results defy conventional wisdom and highlight the intriguing entanglement of domestic political dynamics and global environmental practices. It seems that in the realm of statistical quirks, the "elephant in the room" extends its trunk all the way to the "bamboo" burners of Taiwan!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unveiled the unexpected love story between the political sway in Maryland and the green power of Taiwan. It turns out that Maryland's elephant might be whispering sweet nothings to Taiwan's bamboo. This "republican-tree relationship" may have left us baffled, but it's clear that the influence of political voting patterns transcends borders and languages – it's a "GOP global" affair!

It appears that the ink spilled on the ballots in Maryland might be stirring the biomass pots in Taiwan, creating a connection as tight as a pair of yoga pants at an all-you-can-eat buffet. Who knew that political preferences could have such a "biomassive" impact on sustainable energy practices halfway across the world? It seems that the phrase "vote with your heart" now extends to "vote with your renewable energy output"!

As the saying goes, "where there's smoke, there's fire," and our findings have lit up the room with the realization that political inclinations may be fanning the flames of biomass production in distant lands. Who would've thought that the political climate of Maryland could have such a significant "biomass effect" on Taiwan?

At this juncture, it seems that we have unraveled the mystery behind this unlikely pair. Further research may yield interesting insights, but for now, it's safe to say that this "republican-tree relationship" has been exposed – it's as clear as day. It's time to put this "bipartisan biomass buffoonery" to bed for now. No more research is needed; Maryland and Taiwan seem to be sharing more than just political jargon and renewable energy practices. It's a match made in statistical heaven, and no amount of further analysis can change that!



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited From the Old Line State to the Biomass Burn: Analyzing the Surprising Correlation Between Republican Presidential Votes in Maryland and Biomass Power Generation in Taiwan. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Ecological Politics and Cross-Cultural Energy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited From the Old Line State to the Biomass Burn: Analyzing the Surprising Correlation Between Republican Presidential Votes in Maryland and Biomass Power Generation in Taiwan. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Association for Political Ecology and Renewable Energy Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled From the Old Line State to the Biomass Burn: Analyzing the Surprising Correlation Between Republican Presidential Votes in Maryland and Biomass Power Generation in Taiwan with an abstract of In this paper, we present the unexpected findings of our study on the relationship between votes for the Republican presidential candidate in the state of Maryland and the amount of biomass power generated in Taiwan. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to shed light on this curious connection. Our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9656699 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1989 to 2020. It appears that Maryland's political leanings and Taiwan's renewable energy production share a curious bond – some might even call it a "republican-tree relationship"! Our findings suggest that there may be a deeper interdependence between international political trends and environmental practices than previously realized. As the old saying goes, "When it comes to political influence on global energy, it's all about the elephant (party) in the room!

ChatGPT:

Maryland, Republican presidential votes, biomass power generation, Taiwan, correlation analysis, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Energy Information Administration, renewable energy production, international political trends, environmental practices

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland
Detailed data title: Total votes cast for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland

Biomass power generated in Taiwan
Detailed data title: Total biomass power generated in Taiwan in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Biomass power generated in Taiwan

Correlation r = 0.9656699 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9325184 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Biomass power generated in Taiwan) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland) over the 8 years from 1989 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.9E-5. 0.0000985632243744944900000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 0.0099% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 10,146 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.82, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19921996200020042008201220162020
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland (Total votes)7070946815308138271024700959862971869943428976414
Biomass power generated in Taiwan (Billion kWh)0.2752040.6908621.792723.34933.361233.41923.601973.75309




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([707094,681530,813827,1024700,959862,971869,943428,976414,])
array_2 = np.array([0.275204,0.690862,1.79272,3.3493,3.36123,3.4192,3.60197,3.75309,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Maryland"
array_2_name = "Biomass power generated in Taiwan"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 5450 · Black Variable ID: 25989 · Red Variable ID: 24024
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0