about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,437 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How cool Vihart's YouTube video titles are and the second variable is The number of biological technicians in South Dakota.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of biological technicians in South Dakota decreases, there are fewer people to conduct research on coolness in nature, leading to a lack of inspiration for Vihart's video titles. Remember, when it comes to YouTube videos and biology, there's a direct correlation between techs and text!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that looks like it is a scene from a Disney movie. Illustrate a cozy study room located in South Dakota, with shelves filled with biology textbooks and microscopes. Show a whiteboard filled with intricate natural patterns and a laptop on the desk playing Vihart's YouTube channel. However, the room appears increasingly empty, creating a sense of absence and silence. Depict the whiteboard remaining blank, symbolizing a lack of new discoveries and inspiration for educational content. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How cool Vihart's YouTube video titles are and The number of biological technicians in South Dakota. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Data cyber art Celtic art Voxel art An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Art nouveau
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How cool Vihart's YouTube video titles are and The number of biological technicians in South Dakota, in the following situation: As the number of biological technicians in South Dakota decreases, there are fewer people to conduct research on coolness in nature, leading to a lack of inspiration for Vihart's video titles. Remember, when it comes to YouTube videos and biology, there's a direct correlation between techs and text!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy study room in South Dakota, the shelves are lined with biology textbooks and microscopes, and a whiteboard is filled with drawings of intricate natural patterns. On the desk, there is a laptop with Vihart's YouTube channel open, displaying her video titles like "Snakes + Graphs" and "Sunflower Spirals". However, as the number of biological technicians in the state decreases, the room becomes emptier, creating a sense of absence and silence, and the whiteboard remains blank, symbolizing a lack of new discoveries and inspiration for cool video titles.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy study room in South Dakota, the shelves are lined with biology textbooks and microscopes, and a whiteboard is filled with drawings of intricate natural patterns. On the desk, there is a laptop with Vihart's YouTube channel open, displaying her video titles like "Snakes + Graphs" and "Sunflower Spirals". However, as the number of biological technicians in the state decreases, the room becomes emptier, creating a sense of absence and silence, and the whiteboard remains blank, symbolizing a lack of new discoveries and inspiration for cool video titles. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that looks like it is a scene from a Disney movie. Illustrate a cozy study room located in South Dakota, with shelves filled with biology textbooks and microscopes. Show a whiteboard filled with intricate natural patterns and a laptop on the desk playing Vihart's YouTube channel. However, the room appears increasingly empty, creating a sense of absence and silence. Depict the whiteboard remaining blank, symbolizing a lack of new discoveries and inspiration for educational content.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in How cool Vihart YouTube video titles are caused The number of biological technicians in South Dakota to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Vihart and Biology: A Correlation Analysis of Cool YouTube Video Titles and Biological Technician Employment in South Dakota

The Journal of Quirky Science and Unconventional Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How cool Vihart YouTube video titles are and The number of biological technicians in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8680112 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Vihart and Biology: A Correlation Analysis of Cool YouTube Video Titles and Biological Technician Employment in South Dakota"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a groundbreaking examination of the unexpected relationship between the coolness factor of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of biological technicians employed in the state of South Dakota. Leveraging AI to analyze the linguistic elements and perceived coolness of Vihart video titles, alongside data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8680112 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning from 2009 to 2022. While our findings may initially seem whimsical, they serve as a compelling reminder of the unforeseen connections that may arise in seemingly unrelated domains. This study promises to stimulate further inquiry into the underlying mechanisms driving the synergy between online content and labor market dynamics, all while highlighting the importance of embracing the unexpected in scientific exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How cool Vihart YouTube video titles are and The number of biological technicians in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Vihart and Biology: A Correlation Analysis of Cool YouTube Video Titles and Biological Technician Employment in South Dakota"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a groundbreaking examination of the unexpected relationship between the coolness factor of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of biological technicians employed in the state of South Dakota. Leveraging AI to analyze the linguistic elements and perceived coolness of Vihart video titles, alongside data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8680112 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning from 2009 to 2022. While our findings may initially seem whimsical, they serve as a compelling reminder of the unforeseen connections that may arise in seemingly unrelated domains. This study promises to stimulate further inquiry into the underlying mechanisms driving the synergy between online content and labor market dynamics, all while highlighting the importance of embracing the unexpected in scientific exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The realm of online content creation has burgeoned in the past decade, with an array of platforms offering diverse and engrossing material spanning from educational to entertaining. One particularly captivating figure in this landscape is Vihart, whose thought-provoking and whimsical YouTube videos have garnered a dedicated following. While Vihart's endeavors primarily fall within the domain of mathematics and art, our research seeks to probe the uncharted territory of the potential influence of her video titles on the labor market, specifically the employment of biological technicians in the state of South Dakota.

At first blush, the premise of examining the relationship between Vihart's YouTube video titles and the job market for biological technicians in South Dakota may appear light-hearted, even capricious. However, as we delve into the analysis, it becomes apparent that this whimsical pairing presents an opportunity to scrutinize the unexpected interplay between seemingly incongruous domains. Our investigation leverages advanced computational linguistics techniques to quantify the coolness and linguistic patterns of Vihart's video titles, juxtaposed against the trajectory of biological technician employment in South Dakota over the past decade.

The present study is set against the backdrop of burgeoning advancements in the AI-driven assessment of linguistic elements, wherein we aim to ascertain whether the appeal of Vihart's video titles exerts any discernible impact on the labor market for biological technicians. This pursuit transcends mere curiosity, as it incites scholarly interrogation into the latent forces that may underlie correlations between online content and labor market dynamics.

While the lighthearted juxtaposition of Vihart's YouTube titles and the employment trends of biological technicians in South Dakota may engender amusement, the implications of our findings are far-reaching. Underpinning the playful facade lies a deeper examination of the unanticipated linkages that may emerge between ostensibly unrelated realms. Our analysis promises to kindle further exploration into the often-overlooked intersections between online media, linguistic appeal, and labor market dynamics.

Research probing the unforeseen correlations and influences between seemingly unrelated phenomena elucidates the importance of approaching scientific inquiry with an open mind, embracing the unforeseen confluences and the latent humor that imbues our scholarly pursuits. This study speaks to the inherent eccentricity and whimsy that is often concealed beneath the veneer of academic sobriety, reminding us that even in the pursuit of knowledge, a dash of whimsy and mirth can be found where we least expect it.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How cool Vihart YouTube video titles are and The number of biological technicians in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Vihart and Biology: A Correlation Analysis of Cool YouTube Video Titles and Biological Technician Employment in South Dakota"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a groundbreaking examination of the unexpected relationship between the coolness factor of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of biological technicians employed in the state of South Dakota. Leveraging AI to analyze the linguistic elements and perceived coolness of Vihart video titles, alongside data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8680112 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning from 2009 to 2022. While our findings may initially seem whimsical, they serve as a compelling reminder of the unforeseen connections that may arise in seemingly unrelated domains. This study promises to stimulate further inquiry into the underlying mechanisms driving the synergy between online content and labor market dynamics, all while highlighting the importance of embracing the unexpected in scientific exploration.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The realm of online content creation has burgeoned in the past decade, with an array of platforms offering diverse and engrossing material spanning from educational to entertaining. One particularly captivating figure in this landscape is Vihart, whose thought-provoking and whimsical YouTube videos have garnered a dedicated following. While Vihart's endeavors primarily fall within the domain of mathematics and art, our research seeks to probe the uncharted territory of the potential influence of her video titles on the labor market, specifically the employment of biological technicians in the state of South Dakota.
At first blush, the premise of examining the relationship between Vihart's YouTube video titles and the job market for biological technicians in South Dakota may appear light-hearted, even capricious. However, as we delve into the analysis, it becomes apparent that this whimsical pairing presents an opportunity to scrutinize the unexpected interplay between seemingly incongruous domains. Our investigation leverages advanced computational linguistics techniques to quantify the coolness and linguistic patterns of Vihart's video titles, juxtaposed against the trajectory of biological technician employment in South Dakota over the past decade.
The present study is set against the backdrop of burgeoning advancements in the AI-driven assessment of linguistic elements, wherein we aim to ascertain whether the appeal of Vihart's video titles exerts any discernible impact on the labor market for biological technicians. This pursuit transcends mere curiosity, as it incites scholarly interrogation into the latent forces that may underlie correlations between online content and labor market dynamics.
While the lighthearted juxtaposition of Vihart's YouTube titles and the employment trends of biological technicians in South Dakota may engender amusement, the implications of our findings are far-reaching. Underpinning the playful facade lies a deeper examination of the unanticipated linkages that may emerge between ostensibly unrelated realms. Our analysis promises to kindle further exploration into the often-overlooked intersections between online media, linguistic appeal, and labor market dynamics.
Research probing the unforeseen correlations and influences between seemingly unrelated phenomena elucidates the importance of approaching scientific inquiry with an open mind, embracing the unforeseen confluences and the latent humor that imbues our scholarly pursuits. This study speaks to the inherent eccentricity and whimsy that is often concealed beneath the veneer of academic sobriety, reminding us that even in the pursuit of knowledge, a dash of whimsy and mirth can be found where we least expect it.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between Vihart's YouTube video titles and the employment of biological technicians in South Dakota is a subject that, at first glance, may appear whimsical. However, as we delve into the existing literature, we quickly realize the unexpected potential for correlation between seemingly unrelated domains.

In "Smith and Doe's Analysis of Linguistic Appeal in Online Content," the authors find compelling evidence for the impact of linguistic patterns and coolness factors in online content on viewer engagement. This study provides a strong foundation for our investigation, as we seek to extend the understanding of such linguistic appeal to the labor market dynamics in South Dakota.

Further supporting our exploration, "Jones's Compilation of Unconventional Correlations in the Labor Market" offers a comprehensive overview of unexpected connections between diverse socio-economic factors and labor market trends. While not directly focused on YouTube video titles, this work emphasizes the value of uncovering the hidden relationships that may underlie labor market dynamics.

Shifting to contemporary literature, "Economic Implications of Internet Culture" by Author McAuthorson presents a thought-provoking examination of the influences of online content on economic trends. Despite not specifically delving into the realm of YouTube video titles, the insights from this work inspire us to study the potential impacts of Vihart's videos on the employment landscape in South Dakota.

On a slightly related note, "The Biology of Coolness" by Ipsum and Lorem delves into the biological foundations of what is perceived as "cool." While not directly relevant to our investigation, this book provides an amusing parallel to our research, highlighting the multidisciplinary nature of exploring coolness in the context of biological technician employment.

Venturing into the realm of fiction, the works of authors such as Michael Crichton in "Jurassic Park" and Robin Cook in "Outbreak" offer engaging narratives related to biological research and its societal implications. While these fictional accounts may not directly address our research question, they add a touch of levity to our exploration of the unexpected connections between YouTube videos and the labor market.

In the realm of children's entertainment, cartoons such as "The Magic School Bus" and "Bill Nye the Science Guy" present engaging portrayals of scientific concepts. Although seemingly lighthearted, these shows underscore the potential for seemingly disparate subjects to intersect and inform one another, mirroring the essence of our investigation.

As we navigate this eclectic array of literature, it becomes evident that the interplay between Vihart's YouTube video titles and the employment of biological technicians in South Dakota is a subject ripe for exploration, offering unforeseen potential for uncovering unexpected connections and injecting a dose of mirth into scholarly inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How cool Vihart YouTube video titles are and The number of biological technicians in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2009 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Vihart and Biology: A Correlation Analysis of Cool YouTube Video Titles and Biological Technician Employment in South Dakota"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a groundbreaking examination of the unexpected relationship between the coolness factor of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of biological technicians employed in the state of South Dakota. Leveraging AI to analyze the linguistic elements and perceived coolness of Vihart video titles, alongside data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8680112 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning from 2009 to 2022. While our findings may initially seem whimsical, they serve as a compelling reminder of the unforeseen connections that may arise in seemingly unrelated domains. This study promises to stimulate further inquiry into the underlying mechanisms driving the synergy between online content and labor market dynamics, all while highlighting the importance of embracing the unexpected in scientific exploration.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The realm of online content creation has burgeoned in the past decade, with an array of platforms offering diverse and engrossing material spanning from educational to entertaining. One particularly captivating figure in this landscape is Vihart, whose thought-provoking and whimsical YouTube videos have garnered a dedicated following. While Vihart's endeavors primarily fall within the domain of mathematics and art, our research seeks to probe the uncharted territory of the potential influence of her video titles on the labor market, specifically the employment of biological technicians in the state of South Dakota.
At first blush, the premise of examining the relationship between Vihart's YouTube video titles and the job market for biological technicians in South Dakota may appear light-hearted, even capricious. However, as we delve into the analysis, it becomes apparent that this whimsical pairing presents an opportunity to scrutinize the unexpected interplay between seemingly incongruous domains. Our investigation leverages advanced computational linguistics techniques to quantify the coolness and linguistic patterns of Vihart's video titles, juxtaposed against the trajectory of biological technician employment in South Dakota over the past decade.
The present study is set against the backdrop of burgeoning advancements in the AI-driven assessment of linguistic elements, wherein we aim to ascertain whether the appeal of Vihart's video titles exerts any discernible impact on the labor market for biological technicians. This pursuit transcends mere curiosity, as it incites scholarly interrogation into the latent forces that may underlie correlations between online content and labor market dynamics.
While the lighthearted juxtaposition of Vihart's YouTube titles and the employment trends of biological technicians in South Dakota may engender amusement, the implications of our findings are far-reaching. Underpinning the playful facade lies a deeper examination of the unanticipated linkages that may emerge between ostensibly unrelated realms. Our analysis promises to kindle further exploration into the often-overlooked intersections between online media, linguistic appeal, and labor market dynamics.
Research probing the unforeseen correlations and influences between seemingly unrelated phenomena elucidates the importance of approaching scientific inquiry with an open mind, embracing the unforeseen confluences and the latent humor that imbues our scholarly pursuits. This study speaks to the inherent eccentricity and whimsy that is often concealed beneath the veneer of academic sobriety, reminding us that even in the pursuit of knowledge, a dash of whimsy and mirth can be found where we least expect it.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic connection between the entrancing allure of Vihart's YouTube video titles and the employment landscape of biological technicians in South Dakota, our research team employed a multi-faceted approach that melded computational linguistics, statistical analysis, and a hint of whimsy. The first step in our convoluted journey involved harnessing the power of artificial intelligence to assess the linguistic and tonal intricacies of Vihart's video titles. This process entailed the utilization of cutting-edge sentiment analysis algorithms, which, we must note, displayed a remarkable aptitude for identifying the "coolness" quotient of each title with a discerning eye, almost as if these algorithms had been infused with the very essence of coolness themselves.

Drawing upon this extensive dataset of "coolness" ratings for Vihart's video titles from 2009 to 2022, we proceeded to venture into the realm of statistical acrobatics. Our team navigated the labyrinthine landscape of correlation analysis, cross-referencing the AI-derived coolness scores with the Bureau of Labor Statistics' meticulously documented records of biological technician employment in South Dakota over the same period. As we waded through the sea of numbers, equations, and statistically significant p-values, we couldn't help but marvel at the unexpected beauty that emerged from this quirky juxtaposition of linguistic coolness and labor market data.

Moreover, we should note that our methodology also encompassed a perhaps unconventional exploration into the qualitative intrigue of Vihart's video titles. Delving beyond the mere numbers, we sought to unravel the artistic subtleties and whimsical motifs that might underlie the linguistic tapestry of each title, appreciating each one as if it were a unique piece of avant-garde literature. This qualitative component of our analysis, though less commonly traversed in the realm of statistical research, infused our study with a dash of playful exuberance, reminding us that even in the pursuit of empirical rigor, there lies room for the appreciation of linguistic artistry.

It is crucial to emphasize that despite the frequent whimsical inflections in our approach, the statistical methodologies underpinning our analysis remained firmly anchored in the principles of robust correlation and regression analysis. We steadfastly upheld the rigorous standards expected of scholarly inquiry, all while relishing the offbeat charm infused into our endeavor. This seamless fusion of analytical precision and unorthodox whimsy thus allowed our research to unearth the surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8680112 (p < 0.01), signaling a substantial relationship between the coolness of Vihart's video titles and the employment dynamics of biological technicians in South Dakota.

In conclusion, our methodological odyssey, replete with computational linguistics, statistical derring-do, and a touch of artistic contemplation, culminated in a study that transcends the bounds of traditional research. Our approach speaks to the delightfully unexpected paths that scientific inquiry can tread and the unforeseen connections that may emerge from the most unconventional juxtapositions.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How cool Vihart YouTube video titles are and The number of biological technicians in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2009 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8680112, r-squared of 0.7534435, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Vihart and Biology: A Correlation Analysis of Cool YouTube Video Titles and Biological Technician Employment in South Dakota"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a groundbreaking examination of the unexpected relationship between the coolness factor of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of biological technicians employed in the state of South Dakota. Leveraging AI to analyze the linguistic elements and perceived coolness of Vihart video titles, alongside data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8680112 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning from 2009 to 2022. While our findings may initially seem whimsical, they serve as a compelling reminder of the unforeseen connections that may arise in seemingly unrelated domains. This study promises to stimulate further inquiry into the underlying mechanisms driving the synergy between online content and labor market dynamics, all while highlighting the importance of embracing the unexpected in scientific exploration.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The realm of online content creation has burgeoned in the past decade, with an array of platforms offering diverse and engrossing material spanning from educational to entertaining. One particularly captivating figure in this landscape is Vihart, whose thought-provoking and whimsical YouTube videos have garnered a dedicated following. While Vihart's endeavors primarily fall within the domain of mathematics and art, our research seeks to probe the uncharted territory of the potential influence of her video titles on the labor market, specifically the employment of biological technicians in the state of South Dakota.
At first blush, the premise of examining the relationship between Vihart's YouTube video titles and the job market for biological technicians in South Dakota may appear light-hearted, even capricious. However, as we delve into the analysis, it becomes apparent that this whimsical pairing presents an opportunity to scrutinize the unexpected interplay between seemingly incongruous domains. Our investigation leverages advanced computational linguistics techniques to quantify the coolness and linguistic patterns of Vihart's video titles, juxtaposed against the trajectory of biological technician employment in South Dakota over the past decade.
The present study is set against the backdrop of burgeoning advancements in the AI-driven assessment of linguistic elements, wherein we aim to ascertain whether the appeal of Vihart's video titles exerts any discernible impact on the labor market for biological technicians. This pursuit transcends mere curiosity, as it incites scholarly interrogation into the latent forces that may underlie correlations between online content and labor market dynamics.
While the lighthearted juxtaposition of Vihart's YouTube titles and the employment trends of biological technicians in South Dakota may engender amusement, the implications of our findings are far-reaching. Underpinning the playful facade lies a deeper examination of the unanticipated linkages that may emerge between ostensibly unrelated realms. Our analysis promises to kindle further exploration into the often-overlooked intersections between online media, linguistic appeal, and labor market dynamics.
Research probing the unforeseen correlations and influences between seemingly unrelated phenomena elucidates the importance of approaching scientific inquiry with an open mind, embracing the unforeseen confluences and the latent humor that imbues our scholarly pursuits. This study speaks to the inherent eccentricity and whimsy that is often concealed beneath the veneer of academic sobriety, reminding us that even in the pursuit of knowledge, a dash of whimsy and mirth can be found where we least expect it.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation between the coolness factor of Vihart YouTube video titles and the employment of biological technicians in South Dakota. Over the period of 2009 to 2022, our research team found a correlation coefficient of 0.8680112, signifying a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Furthermore, the R-squared value of 0.7534435 indicates that approximately 75.3% of the variation in biological technician employment in South Dakota can be explained by the coolness factor of Vihart's YouTube video titles. The p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of our findings, reaffirming the robustness of the observed correlation.

Our findings are visually depicted in Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the pronounced relationship between the coolness factor of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of biological technicians employed in South Dakota. The data points form a clear upward trend, underscoring the striking correlation uncovered through our analysis.

The implications of our research extend beyond the unconventional juxtaposition of Vihart's YouTube titles and the employment of biological technicians; they invite us to contemplate the unforeseen connections that may lurk beneath the surface of apparently unrelated domains. While the quirkiness of our investigation may prompt a smile, the resonance of our results serves as a potent reminder of the charming unpredictability inherent in scientific exploration. This study not only uncovers an unexpected correlation but also highlights the importance of embracing the unanticipated in scientific inquiry, proving that even in the most unexpected places, the seeds of correlation and causation can be sown.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How cool Vihart YouTube video titles are and The number of biological technicians in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Vihart and Biology: A Correlation Analysis of Cool YouTube Video Titles and Biological Technician Employment in South Dakota"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a groundbreaking examination of the unexpected relationship between the coolness factor of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of biological technicians employed in the state of South Dakota. Leveraging AI to analyze the linguistic elements and perceived coolness of Vihart video titles, alongside data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8680112 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning from 2009 to 2022. While our findings may initially seem whimsical, they serve as a compelling reminder of the unforeseen connections that may arise in seemingly unrelated domains. This study promises to stimulate further inquiry into the underlying mechanisms driving the synergy between online content and labor market dynamics, all while highlighting the importance of embracing the unexpected in scientific exploration.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between Vihart's YouTube video titles and the employment of biological technicians in South Dakota is a subject that, at first glance, may appear whimsical. However, as we delve into the existing literature, we quickly realize the unexpected potential for correlation between seemingly unrelated domains.
In "Smith and Doe's Analysis of Linguistic Appeal in Online Content," the authors find compelling evidence for the impact of linguistic patterns and coolness factors in online content on viewer engagement. This study provides a strong foundation for our investigation, as we seek to extend the understanding of such linguistic appeal to the labor market dynamics in South Dakota.
Further supporting our exploration, "Jones's Compilation of Unconventional Correlations in the Labor Market" offers a comprehensive overview of unexpected connections between diverse socio-economic factors and labor market trends. While not directly focused on YouTube video titles, this work emphasizes the value of uncovering the hidden relationships that may underlie labor market dynamics.
Shifting to contemporary literature, "Economic Implications of Internet Culture" by Author McAuthorson presents a thought-provoking examination of the influences of online content on economic trends. Despite not specifically delving into the realm of YouTube video titles, the insights from this work inspire us to study the potential impacts of Vihart's videos on the employment landscape in South Dakota.
On a slightly related note, "The Biology of Coolness" by Ipsum and Lorem delves into the biological foundations of what is perceived as "cool." While not directly relevant to our investigation, this book provides an amusing parallel to our research, highlighting the multidisciplinary nature of exploring coolness in the context of biological technician employment.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, the works of authors such as Michael Crichton in "Jurassic Park" and Robin Cook in "Outbreak" offer engaging narratives related to biological research and its societal implications. While these fictional accounts may not directly address our research question, they add a touch of levity to our exploration of the unexpected connections between YouTube videos and the labor market.
In the realm of children's entertainment, cartoons such as "The Magic School Bus" and "Bill Nye the Science Guy" present engaging portrayals of scientific concepts. Although seemingly lighthearted, these shows underscore the potential for seemingly disparate subjects to intersect and inform one another, mirroring the essence of our investigation.
As we navigate this eclectic array of literature, it becomes evident that the interplay between Vihart's YouTube video titles and the employment of biological technicians in South Dakota is a subject ripe for exploration, offering unforeseen potential for uncovering unexpected connections and injecting a dose of mirth into scholarly inquiry.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation between the coolness factor of Vihart YouTube video titles and the employment of biological technicians in South Dakota. Over the period of 2009 to 2022, our research team found a correlation coefficient of 0.8680112, signifying a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Furthermore, the R-squared value of 0.7534435 indicates that approximately 75.3% of the variation in biological technician employment in South Dakota can be explained by the coolness factor of Vihart's YouTube video titles. The p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of our findings, reaffirming the robustness of the observed correlation.
Our findings are visually depicted in Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the pronounced relationship between the coolness factor of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of biological technicians employed in South Dakota. The data points form a clear upward trend, underscoring the striking correlation uncovered through our analysis.
The implications of our research extend beyond the unconventional juxtaposition of Vihart's YouTube titles and the employment of biological technicians; they invite us to contemplate the unforeseen connections that may lurk beneath the surface of apparently unrelated domains. While the quirkiness of our investigation may prompt a smile, the resonance of our results serves as a potent reminder of the charming unpredictability inherent in scientific exploration. This study not only uncovers an unexpected correlation but also highlights the importance of embracing the unanticipated in scientific inquiry, proving that even in the most unexpected places, the seeds of correlation and causation can be sown.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings exhilaratingly validate the unanticipated correlation between the coolness of Vihart's YouTube video titles and the employment of biological technicians in South Dakota. The stringent statistical significance and robust correlation coefficient underscore the compelling synergy between seemingly unrelated realms. While this correlation may seem like a fanciful discovery, it propels us into the realm of the unexpected, shining a humorous spotlight on the enthralling quirkiness of correlation analysis.

In light of our results, it is evident that the influence of online content, as embodied by Vihart's YouTube video titles, reaches far beyond the virtual sphere. The resonance of linguistic appeal and perceived coolness, as documented in prior research, finds an unexpected foothold in the labor market dynamics of South Dakota. Smith and Doe's groundbreaking insights into linguistic patterns and viewer engagement indeed lay the groundwork for our investigation, embellishing the scholarly pursuit with a touch of vivaciousness.

Even Jones's compilation of "unconventional correlations" in the labor market, while not explicitly delving into YouTube video titles, casts a playful shadow of credibility on our whimsical correlation. The unforeseen connections and uncanny alliances between diverse socio-economic factors vividly manifest in our analysis, painting a charming portrait of the scholarly pursuit.

The amusing parallel drawn between our investigation and the "Biology of Coolness" by Ipsum and Lorem unexpectedly sheds light on the multidisciplinary nature of our exploration. This eccentric association subliminally illustrates the delightful synchrony of seemingly unrelated subjects, infusing our discussion with an undercurrent of drollery. As we navigate through this playful tapestry of literature, the interplay between Vihart's YouTube video titles and the employment of biological technicians in South Dakota is cast in a sprightly light, reiterating the unforeseen potential for scholarly mirth.

The captivating correlation uncovered by our research not only amuses but also enriches the scholarly pursuit with an entrancing unpredictability, highlighting the intrinsic charm of scientific inquiry. Our endeavor, while ostensibly whimsical, unfurls the captivating tapestry of correlation analysis, where even the most seemingly incongruous variables entwine in an ebullient dance of statistical significance.

In the face of the delightful correlation unveiled by our study, it is imperative to recognize the tantalizing allure of the unexpected and remain open to the playful embrace of correlation, wherever it may unpredictably manifest. This exploration, buoyed by a spirit of scholarly caprice, challenges us to envisage the enthralling intersections that lurk beneath the surface of scholarly inquiry, beckoning us to embark on a colorful journey that brightly embraces the enigmatic joy of uncanny alliances.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How cool Vihart YouTube video titles are and The number of biological technicians in South Dakota. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Vihart and Biology: A Correlation Analysis of Cool YouTube Video Titles and Biological Technician Employment in South Dakota"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a groundbreaking examination of the unexpected relationship between the coolness factor of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of biological technicians employed in the state of South Dakota. Leveraging AI to analyze the linguistic elements and perceived coolness of Vihart video titles, alongside data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8680112 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning from 2009 to 2022. While our findings may initially seem whimsical, they serve as a compelling reminder of the unforeseen connections that may arise in seemingly unrelated domains. This study promises to stimulate further inquiry into the underlying mechanisms driving the synergy between online content and labor market dynamics, all while highlighting the importance of embracing the unexpected in scientific exploration.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The realm of online content creation has burgeoned in the past decade, with an array of platforms offering diverse and engrossing material spanning from educational to entertaining. One particularly captivating figure in this landscape is Vihart, whose thought-provoking and whimsical YouTube videos have garnered a dedicated following. While Vihart's endeavors primarily fall within the domain of mathematics and art, our research seeks to probe the uncharted territory of the potential influence of her video titles on the labor market, specifically the employment of biological technicians in the state of South Dakota.
At first blush, the premise of examining the relationship between Vihart's YouTube video titles and the job market for biological technicians in South Dakota may appear light-hearted, even capricious. However, as we delve into the analysis, it becomes apparent that this whimsical pairing presents an opportunity to scrutinize the unexpected interplay between seemingly incongruous domains. Our investigation leverages advanced computational linguistics techniques to quantify the coolness and linguistic patterns of Vihart's video titles, juxtaposed against the trajectory of biological technician employment in South Dakota over the past decade.
The present study is set against the backdrop of burgeoning advancements in the AI-driven assessment of linguistic elements, wherein we aim to ascertain whether the appeal of Vihart's video titles exerts any discernible impact on the labor market for biological technicians. This pursuit transcends mere curiosity, as it incites scholarly interrogation into the latent forces that may underlie correlations between online content and labor market dynamics.
While the lighthearted juxtaposition of Vihart's YouTube titles and the employment trends of biological technicians in South Dakota may engender amusement, the implications of our findings are far-reaching. Underpinning the playful facade lies a deeper examination of the unanticipated linkages that may emerge between ostensibly unrelated realms. Our analysis promises to kindle further exploration into the often-overlooked intersections between online media, linguistic appeal, and labor market dynamics.
Research probing the unforeseen correlations and influences between seemingly unrelated phenomena elucidates the importance of approaching scientific inquiry with an open mind, embracing the unforeseen confluences and the latent humor that imbues our scholarly pursuits. This study speaks to the inherent eccentricity and whimsy that is often concealed beneath the veneer of academic sobriety, reminding us that even in the pursuit of knowledge, a dash of whimsy and mirth can be found where we least expect it.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation between the coolness factor of Vihart YouTube video titles and the employment of biological technicians in South Dakota. Over the period of 2009 to 2022, our research team found a correlation coefficient of 0.8680112, signifying a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Furthermore, the R-squared value of 0.7534435 indicates that approximately 75.3% of the variation in biological technician employment in South Dakota can be explained by the coolness factor of Vihart's YouTube video titles. The p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of our findings, reaffirming the robustness of the observed correlation.
Our findings are visually depicted in Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the pronounced relationship between the coolness factor of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of biological technicians employed in South Dakota. The data points form a clear upward trend, underscoring the striking correlation uncovered through our analysis.
The implications of our research extend beyond the unconventional juxtaposition of Vihart's YouTube titles and the employment of biological technicians; they invite us to contemplate the unforeseen connections that may lurk beneath the surface of apparently unrelated domains. While the quirkiness of our investigation may prompt a smile, the resonance of our results serves as a potent reminder of the charming unpredictability inherent in scientific exploration. This study not only uncovers an unexpected correlation but also highlights the importance of embracing the unanticipated in scientific inquiry, proving that even in the most unexpected places, the seeds of correlation and causation can be sown.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In concluding, our study has shed light on the hitherto unforeseen correlation between the coolness factor of Vihart YouTube video titles and the employment of biological technicians in South Dakota. The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8680112 highlights the intriguing relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. We have demonstrated that approximately 75.3% of the variation in biological technician employment in South Dakota can be elucidated by the coolness factor of Vihart's YouTube video titles, a fact that may leave some scratching their heads and others nodding in amusement.

This whimsical exploration has not only amused but also underscored the importance of embracing the unexpected in scientific inquiry. It serves as a poignant reminder of the delightful unpredictability that pervades the realm of scholarly pursuits. As we bid adieu to this peak of academic whimsy, we assert with all due sobriety that no further inquiry is needed in this utterly curious terrain of correlation between Vihart's YouTube titles and the employment of biological technicians. The incongruous yet undeniably captivating aspects of this study have rendered further research unnecessary, showcasing the remarkable capacity for mirth and awe in scholarly endeavors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Vihart and Biology: A Correlation Analysis of Cool YouTube Video Titles and Biological Technician Employment in South Dakota. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Science and Unconventional Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Vihart and Biology: A Correlation Analysis of Cool YouTube Video Titles and Biological Technician Employment in South Dakota. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Science Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Vihart and Biology: A Correlation Analysis of Cool YouTube Video Titles and Biological Technician Employment in South Dakota with an abstract of This paper presents a groundbreaking examination of the unexpected relationship between the coolness factor of Vihart YouTube video titles and the number of biological technicians employed in the state of South Dakota. Leveraging AI to analyze the linguistic elements and perceived coolness of Vihart video titles, alongside data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8680112 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning from 2009 to 2022. While our findings may initially seem whimsical, they serve as a compelling reminder of the unforeseen connections that may arise in seemingly unrelated domains. This study promises to stimulate further inquiry into the underlying mechanisms driving the synergy between online content and labor market dynamics, all while highlighting the importance of embracing the unexpected in scientific exploration.

ChatGPT:

Vihart, YouTube, video titles, linguistic elements, coolness factor, AI analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, biological technicians, employment, South Dakota, correlation analysis, statistical significance, labor market dynamics, online content, scientific exploration, unexpected connections

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How cool Vihart's YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How cool Vihart YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How cool Vihart's YouTube video titles are

The number of biological technicians in South Dakota
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of biological technicians in South Dakota
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of biological technicians in South Dakota

Correlation r = 0.8680112 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7534435 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 75.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of biological technicians in South Dakota) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How cool Vihart's YouTube video titles are) over the 14 years from 2009 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.71E-5. 0.0000570951166306844550000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 0.00571% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 17,515 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 13 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 13 because we have two variables measured over a period of 14 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.63, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
How cool Vihart's YouTube video titles are (Coolness score (out of 10))77.66676.76476.38716.38467.14295.66675.88896.57146.18186.333375.33335.1667
The number of biological technicians in South Dakota (Biological Technicians)340360290300270280210210230270270270190200




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7,7.6667,6.7647,6.3871,6.3846,7.1429,5.6667,5.8889,6.5714,6.1818,6.3333,7,5.3333,5.1667,])
array_2 = np.array([340,360,290,300,270,280,210,210,230,270,270,270,190,200,])
array_1_name = "How cool Vihart's YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "The number of biological technicians in South Dakota"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 5437 · Black Variable ID: 25551 · Red Variable ID: 14215
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0