Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the number of optometrists in Nebraska decreases, there's been a sharp decline in the creation of professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles. Who would have thought that the state known for "seeing" the future of eye care would have such a myopic impact on outer space content!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a futuristic YouTube studio set in a sleek, minimalist space. In the center of the room, a large whiteboard with neon blue accents displays the title "SciShow Space" at the top. Alongside this, there's a grid of video titles like "The Quasars Mystery" and "Unraveling the Dark Matter". Below the title grid, a holographic line graph shows a steep decline in the number of optometrists in Nebraska over the years. The graph's downturn is in sync with the changes in professionalism of the video titles displayed above, which now read "Space Stuff" and "Cool Space Facts". The studio should exude a futuristic vibe with holographic interfaces and sleek, angular furniture. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles are and The number of optometrists in Nebraska. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s A photo-realistic image Brutalism Futuristic Symbolism
ChatGPT: Futuristic
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles are and The number of optometrists in Nebraska, in the following situation: As the number of optometrists in Nebraska decreases, there's been a sharp decline in the creation of professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles. Who would have thought that the state known for "seeing" the future of eye care would have such a myopic impact on outer space content!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a YouTube studio, a whiteboard with the title "SciShow Space" is shown. The top portion lists videos with titles like "The Quasars Mystery" and "Unraveling the Dark Matter". Alongside this, a line graph on the lower half shows a steep drop in the number of optometrists in Nebraska over the years. The dwindling number coincides with a noticeable downturn in the professionalism of the video titles, which now include "Space Stuff" and "Cool Space Facts".
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Futuristic ] and depicting this scene: In a YouTube studio, a whiteboard with the title "SciShow Space" is shown. The top portion lists videos with titles like "The Quasars Mystery" and "Unraveling the Dark Matter". Alongside this, a line graph on the lower half shows a steep drop in the number of optometrists in Nebraska over the years. The dwindling number coincides with a noticeable downturn in the professionalism of the video titles, which now include "Space Stuff" and "Cool Space Facts". Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a futuristic YouTube studio set in a sleek, minimalist space. In the center of the room, a large whiteboard with neon blue accents displays the title "SciShow Space" at the top. Alongside this, there's a grid of video titles like "The Quasars Mystery" and "Unraveling the Dark Matter". Below the title grid, a holographic line graph shows a steep decline in the number of optometrists in Nebraska over the years. The graph's downturn is in sync with the changes in professionalism of the video titles displayed above, which now read "Space Stuff" and "Cool Space Facts". The studio should exude a futuristic vibe with holographic interfaces and sleek, angular furniture.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in How professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles are caused The number of optometrists in Nebraska to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.
AI academic paper
Eye on the Skies: The Correlation Between SciShow Space YouTube Video Titles and Optometrists in Nebraska The Journal of Astronomical Optics Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles are and The number of optometrists in Nebraska. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Include a pun in the title.
Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9829523 and p < 0.01 for 2014 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Eye on the Skies: The Correlation Between SciShow Space YouTube Video Titles and Optometrists in Nebraska"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the findings of our research into the puzzling relationship between the professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the number of optometrists in the great state of Nebraska. Our team, comprised of curious individuals with both a knack for data analysis and a taste for quirky correlations, utilized AI analysis of YouTube video titles as well as data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to assess this unconventional connection.
What started as a whimsical investigation turned into a discovery that left us seeing stars – pun intended. The correlation coefficient of 0.9829523 and p < 0.01 for the duration of 2014 to 2022 piqued our interest and led us to delve into the world of celestial eyewear. Our findings suggest a remarkably strong positive correlation between the sophistication level of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the propensity of Nebraskan residents to seek out optometric services.
While the dwindling line between causation and correlation prompted some contemplation over cosmic coincidences, our data could not escape the allure of this surprisingly robust relationship. The implications of our study may seem far-fetched at first glance, but we invite readers to look beyond the conventional boundaries of research and open their eyes to the cosmic comedy that underlies this correlation.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles are and The number of optometrists in Nebraska. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Eye on the Skies: The Correlation Between SciShow Space YouTube Video Titles and Optometrists in Nebraska"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the findings of our research into the puzzling relationship between the professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the number of optometrists in the great state of Nebraska. Our team, comprised of curious individuals with both a knack for data analysis and a taste for quirky correlations, utilized AI analysis of YouTube video titles as well as data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to assess this unconventional connection.
What started as a whimsical investigation turned into a discovery that left us seeing stars – pun intended. The correlation coefficient of 0.9829523 and p < 0.01 for the duration of 2014 to 2022 piqued our interest and led us to delve into the world of celestial eyewear. Our findings suggest a remarkably strong positive correlation between the sophistication level of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the propensity of Nebraskan residents to seek out optometric services.
While the dwindling line between causation and correlation prompted some contemplation over cosmic coincidences, our data could not escape the allure of this surprisingly robust relationship. The implications of our study may seem far-fetched at first glance, but we invite readers to look beyond the conventional boundaries of research and open their eyes to the cosmic comedy that underlies this correlation.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
**[[INTRODUCTION]]**
The intersection of whimsy and wonder, of data analysis and optical anomalies, has led us into a cosmic voyage of discovery. Our investigation into the relationship between the eloquence of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the prevalence of optometrists in the heartland of Nebraska has been nothing short of eye-opening - pardon the pun.
The allure of delving into the depths of this peculiar correlation was irresistible, much like a pair of stylish, space-themed spectacles catching the eye of an adventurous stargazer. While the rational mind may initially scoff at the idea of a connection between astronomy-themed YouTube titles and the provision of eye care services in the Cornhusker State, our data paints a compelling picture.
As we embarked on this odyssey of unconventional research, our team of intrepid investigators sought to bring a touch of levity to the often serious world of data analysis. We harnessed the power of artificial intelligence to dissect the linguistic nuances of SciShow Space video titles and sifted through the Bureau of Labor Statistics' treasure trove of data on optometric professionals in Nebraska. The resulting correlation coefficient of 0.9829523 and p < 0.01 sent us into a spin, all while keeping our feet firmly planted on the ground – or, in this case, our eyes fixed on the sky.
The findings of our rigorous analysis suggest a remarkably robust positive correlation between the sophistication level of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the proclivity of Nebraskan residents to seek out optometric care. It's as if the mesmerizing allure of cosmic phenomena, as encapsulated in the stylish verbiage of video titles, serves as a celestial beacon guiding individuals towards the realm of ocular health.
This study dances along the delicate line between correlation and causation, inviting contemplation on the cosmic coincidences that permeate our universe. We are acutely aware of the inherent whimsy underlying this investigation, but our data refuses to be dismissed as a mere cosmic quirk. The implications of our findings transcend the boundaries of conventional research, urging us to look beyond the mundane and embrace the cosmic comedy that underscores this enigmatic correlation.
So, buckle up and don your metaphorical astronomical eyewear as we journey through the cosmos of YouTube titles and optometric destinies, where the unexpected connections between the stars and the spectacle-wearers reveal a universe of mirth and mystery.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles are and The number of optometrists in Nebraska. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Eye on the Skies: The Correlation Between SciShow Space YouTube Video Titles and Optometrists in Nebraska"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the findings of our research into the puzzling relationship between the professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the number of optometrists in the great state of Nebraska. Our team, comprised of curious individuals with both a knack for data analysis and a taste for quirky correlations, utilized AI analysis of YouTube video titles as well as data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to assess this unconventional connection.
What started as a whimsical investigation turned into a discovery that left us seeing stars – pun intended. The correlation coefficient of 0.9829523 and p < 0.01 for the duration of 2014 to 2022 piqued our interest and led us to delve into the world of celestial eyewear. Our findings suggest a remarkably strong positive correlation between the sophistication level of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the propensity of Nebraskan residents to seek out optometric services.
While the dwindling line between causation and correlation prompted some contemplation over cosmic coincidences, our data could not escape the allure of this surprisingly robust relationship. The implications of our study may seem far-fetched at first glance, but we invite readers to look beyond the conventional boundaries of research and open their eyes to the cosmic comedy that underlies this correlation.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of whimsy and wonder, of data analysis and optical anomalies, has led us into a cosmic voyage of discovery. Our investigation into the relationship between the eloquence of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the prevalence of optometrists in the heartland of Nebraska has been nothing short of eye-opening - pardon the pun.
The allure of delving into the depths of this peculiar correlation was irresistible, much like a pair of stylish, space-themed spectacles catching the eye of an adventurous stargazer. While the rational mind may initially scoff at the idea of a connection between astronomy-themed YouTube titles and the provision of eye care services in the Cornhusker State, our data paints a compelling picture.
As we embarked on this odyssey of unconventional research, our team of intrepid investigators sought to bring a touch of levity to the often serious world of data analysis. We harnessed the power of artificial intelligence to dissect the linguistic nuances of SciShow Space video titles and sifted through the Bureau of Labor Statistics' treasure trove of data on optometric professionals in Nebraska. The resulting correlation coefficient of 0.9829523 and p < 0.01 sent us into a spin, all while keeping our feet firmly planted on the ground – or, in this case, our eyes fixed on the sky.
The findings of our rigorous analysis suggest a remarkably robust positive correlation between the sophistication level of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the proclivity of Nebraskan residents to seek out optometric care. It's as if the mesmerizing allure of cosmic phenomena, as encapsulated in the stylish verbiage of video titles, serves as a celestial beacon guiding individuals towards the realm of ocular health.
This study dances along the delicate line between correlation and causation, inviting contemplation on the cosmic coincidences that permeate our universe. We are acutely aware of the inherent whimsy underlying this investigation, but our data refuses to be dismissed as a mere cosmic quirk. The implications of our findings transcend the boundaries of conventional research, urging us to look beyond the mundane and embrace the cosmic comedy that underscores this enigmatic correlation.
So, buckle up and don your metaphorical astronomical eyewear as we journey through the cosmos of YouTube titles and optometric destinies, where the unexpected connections between the stars and the spectacle-wearers reveal a universe of mirth and mystery.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
A number of studies have delved into the connections between language and consumer behaviors, as well as the impact of digital media on various industries. Smith et al. (2016) explored the influence of linguistic sophistication in advertising on consumer purchasing decisions, finding a positive correlation between the two variables. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) conducted a comprehensive analysis of content language in online videos and its association with user engagement, shedding light on the potent influence of linguistic appeal.
Moving beyond the realm of targeted linguistic influence, the impact of technological advancements in the digital age has garnered attention from researchers and practitioners alike. In "The New Digital Age" by Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen, the authors examine the profound effects of digital technologies on various facets of human life, offering insights into the ways in which online platforms shape contemporary behaviors and trends. Likewise, the book "The Tipping Point" by Malcolm Gladwell discusses the pivotal role of small changes and trends in precipitating significant shifts in societal behaviors, providing a broader understanding of the intricate dynamics at play in modern consumer landscapes.
However, as the scope of our investigation meanders into the cosmic conundrum of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the optometric landscape of Nebraska, we must also acknowledge the tangential pearls of wisdom offered by fiction and popular culture. In the realm of literary imagination, works such as "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams and "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan transport readers on whimsical journeys through the cosmos, imparting a sense of wonder and curiosity about the celestial expanse.
And who could forget the cinematic odysseys that have sparked our imaginations and, perhaps, influenced our perceptions of the cosmic realm? Films like "Interstellar" and "Spaceballs" have etched themselves into popular culture, weaving narratives that straddle the line between scientific inquiry and comedic relief. Through their interstellar escapades and cosmic capers, these movies beckon us to contemplate the cosmic coincidences that may lie beyond the mundane world of empirical data.
As we wade through this eclectic mix of literature and media, we are reminded of the multifaceted influences that shape our understanding of language, consumer behavior, and the enigmatic connections that defy conventional explanation. With this broadened perspective, we can approach our investigation with a measure of lighthearted curiosity, daring to peer into the cosmic comedy that may underpin the unexpected correlation between otherworldly YouTube titles and the earthly pursuit of ocular care.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles are and The number of optometrists in Nebraska. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2014 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Eye on the Skies: The Correlation Between SciShow Space YouTube Video Titles and Optometrists in Nebraska"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the findings of our research into the puzzling relationship between the professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the number of optometrists in the great state of Nebraska. Our team, comprised of curious individuals with both a knack for data analysis and a taste for quirky correlations, utilized AI analysis of YouTube video titles as well as data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to assess this unconventional connection.
What started as a whimsical investigation turned into a discovery that left us seeing stars – pun intended. The correlation coefficient of 0.9829523 and p < 0.01 for the duration of 2014 to 2022 piqued our interest and led us to delve into the world of celestial eyewear. Our findings suggest a remarkably strong positive correlation between the sophistication level of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the propensity of Nebraskan residents to seek out optometric services.
While the dwindling line between causation and correlation prompted some contemplation over cosmic coincidences, our data could not escape the allure of this surprisingly robust relationship. The implications of our study may seem far-fetched at first glance, but we invite readers to look beyond the conventional boundaries of research and open their eyes to the cosmic comedy that underlies this correlation.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of whimsy and wonder, of data analysis and optical anomalies, has led us into a cosmic voyage of discovery. Our investigation into the relationship between the eloquence of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the prevalence of optometrists in the heartland of Nebraska has been nothing short of eye-opening - pardon the pun.
The allure of delving into the depths of this peculiar correlation was irresistible, much like a pair of stylish, space-themed spectacles catching the eye of an adventurous stargazer. While the rational mind may initially scoff at the idea of a connection between astronomy-themed YouTube titles and the provision of eye care services in the Cornhusker State, our data paints a compelling picture.
As we embarked on this odyssey of unconventional research, our team of intrepid investigators sought to bring a touch of levity to the often serious world of data analysis. We harnessed the power of artificial intelligence to dissect the linguistic nuances of SciShow Space video titles and sifted through the Bureau of Labor Statistics' treasure trove of data on optometric professionals in Nebraska. The resulting correlation coefficient of 0.9829523 and p < 0.01 sent us into a spin, all while keeping our feet firmly planted on the ground – or, in this case, our eyes fixed on the sky.
The findings of our rigorous analysis suggest a remarkably robust positive correlation between the sophistication level of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the proclivity of Nebraskan residents to seek out optometric care. It's as if the mesmerizing allure of cosmic phenomena, as encapsulated in the stylish verbiage of video titles, serves as a celestial beacon guiding individuals towards the realm of ocular health.
This study dances along the delicate line between correlation and causation, inviting contemplation on the cosmic coincidences that permeate our universe. We are acutely aware of the inherent whimsy underlying this investigation, but our data refuses to be dismissed as a mere cosmic quirk. The implications of our findings transcend the boundaries of conventional research, urging us to look beyond the mundane and embrace the cosmic comedy that underscores this enigmatic correlation.
So, buckle up and don your metaphorical astronomical eyewear as we journey through the cosmos of YouTube titles and optometric destinies, where the unexpected connections between the stars and the spectacle-wearers reveal a universe of mirth and mystery.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To unravel the peculiar connection between the linguistic elegance of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the density of optometrists in the state of Nebraska, our research team embarked on a journey that blended the rigor of data analysis with the whimsy of cosmic curiosity. Our methodology, much like a well-crafted pun, comprised a fusion of AI analysis of YouTube video titles and data extraction from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to illuminate the celestial path of this unconventional correlation.
Data Extraction from the Cosmic Web:
We harnessed the power of artificial intelligence to wade through the ever-expanding cosmos of SciShow Space YouTube video titles, a task only slightly less daunting than navigating a maze while riding a unicycle. Our AI algorithms combed through the linguistic constellations of these video titles, capturing the essence of their sophistication and eloquence while avoiding the gravitational pull of mundane internet content.
The Virtuous Quest for Nebraska's Optometric Data:
In our pursuit of optometric enlightenment, we navigated through the labyrinthine corridors of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, much like intrepid explorers charting new territories. We extracted data on the number of optometrists in Nebraska, carefully sieving through the statistical stardust to reveal the constellation of ocular healthcare professionals in the Cornhusker State.
Quantum Leap into Data Analysis:
Armed with our celestial bounty of YouTube title sophistication and optometric figures, we dove headfirst into the nebulous depths of data analysis, where certainty waned and uncertainty waxed like the phases of a cosmic moon. Utilizing statistical software that was as reliable as a starship navigating through a meteor shower, we calculated correlation coefficients and p-values to reveal the cosmic dance between these seemingly disparate variables.
Chronological Lenses:
Our investigation spanned the temporal expanse from 2014 to 2022, capturing the nuances of correlation across the celestial timeline of the internet era. We accounted for the ebb and flow of linguistic trends, much like astronomers tracking the movement of celestial bodies, ensuring that our analysis encapsulated the full breadth of this cosmic relationship.
Limitations and Lighthearted Reflection:
While our approach exuded the rigor of scientific inquiry, we acknowledge the inherent whimsy woven into the fabric of our investigation. The interplay between cosmic linguistic sophistication and ophthalmic care is as enigmatic as a black hole at a galactic masquerade ball, inviting lighthearted reflection amidst the seriousness of scholarly pursuit.
Our methodology, esoteric and eclectic as it may be, served as the launchpad for our exploration of this thought-provoking correlation, guiding us through the celestial expanse of YouTube titles and the terrestrial landscape of optometric endeavors.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles are and The number of optometrists in Nebraska. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .
For the time period 2014 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9829523, r-squared of 0.9661953, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Eye on the Skies: The Correlation Between SciShow Space YouTube Video Titles and Optometrists in Nebraska"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the findings of our research into the puzzling relationship between the professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the number of optometrists in the great state of Nebraska. Our team, comprised of curious individuals with both a knack for data analysis and a taste for quirky correlations, utilized AI analysis of YouTube video titles as well as data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to assess this unconventional connection.
What started as a whimsical investigation turned into a discovery that left us seeing stars – pun intended. The correlation coefficient of 0.9829523 and p < 0.01 for the duration of 2014 to 2022 piqued our interest and led us to delve into the world of celestial eyewear. Our findings suggest a remarkably strong positive correlation between the sophistication level of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the propensity of Nebraskan residents to seek out optometric services.
While the dwindling line between causation and correlation prompted some contemplation over cosmic coincidences, our data could not escape the allure of this surprisingly robust relationship. The implications of our study may seem far-fetched at first glance, but we invite readers to look beyond the conventional boundaries of research and open their eyes to the cosmic comedy that underlies this correlation.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of whimsy and wonder, of data analysis and optical anomalies, has led us into a cosmic voyage of discovery. Our investigation into the relationship between the eloquence of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the prevalence of optometrists in the heartland of Nebraska has been nothing short of eye-opening - pardon the pun.
The allure of delving into the depths of this peculiar correlation was irresistible, much like a pair of stylish, space-themed spectacles catching the eye of an adventurous stargazer. While the rational mind may initially scoff at the idea of a connection between astronomy-themed YouTube titles and the provision of eye care services in the Cornhusker State, our data paints a compelling picture.
As we embarked on this odyssey of unconventional research, our team of intrepid investigators sought to bring a touch of levity to the often serious world of data analysis. We harnessed the power of artificial intelligence to dissect the linguistic nuances of SciShow Space video titles and sifted through the Bureau of Labor Statistics' treasure trove of data on optometric professionals in Nebraska. The resulting correlation coefficient of 0.9829523 and p < 0.01 sent us into a spin, all while keeping our feet firmly planted on the ground – or, in this case, our eyes fixed on the sky.
The findings of our rigorous analysis suggest a remarkably robust positive correlation between the sophistication level of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the proclivity of Nebraskan residents to seek out optometric care. It's as if the mesmerizing allure of cosmic phenomena, as encapsulated in the stylish verbiage of video titles, serves as a celestial beacon guiding individuals towards the realm of ocular health.
This study dances along the delicate line between correlation and causation, inviting contemplation on the cosmic coincidences that permeate our universe. We are acutely aware of the inherent whimsy underlying this investigation, but our data refuses to be dismissed as a mere cosmic quirk. The implications of our findings transcend the boundaries of conventional research, urging us to look beyond the mundane and embrace the cosmic comedy that underscores this enigmatic correlation.
So, buckle up and don your metaphorical astronomical eyewear as we journey through the cosmos of YouTube titles and optometric destinies, where the unexpected connections between the stars and the spectacle-wearers reveal a universe of mirth and mystery.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis yielded a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.9829523, indicating an exceptionally strong positive relationship between the sophistication level of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the number of optometrists in Nebraska. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9661953, indicating that a substantial proportion of the variability in the number of optometrists can be explained by the sophistication of the YouTube video titles. The p-value of less than 0.01 solidifies the statistical significance of this correlation, providing compelling evidence to support our findings.
Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between the two variables, further reinforcing the strength of the relationship. The scatterplot clearly demonstrates a positively sloped trend line, affirming the close association between the eloquence of SciShow Space video titles and the prevalence of optometric services in Nebraska. It appears that as the linguistic sophistication of the video titles increases, so does the demand for optometric care in the state, creating an intriguing juxtaposition of cosmic curiosity and ocular health.
These robust statistical results not only confirm the presence of a compelling association but also highlight the remarkable coherence between the themes of interstellar exploration and the terrestrial pursuit of visual acuity. While one might initially perceive this correlation as an astronomical anomaly, our data ceaselessly beckons us to embrace the cosmic comedy that underlies this unexpected relationship.
Our results stand as a testament to the consequential interplay between the realm of astronomy-themed content and the tangible demand for optometric services, inviting us to marvel at the whimsical intricacies that intertwine the celestial and the earthly. Through the lens of our findings, a new frontier of inquiry emerges, inviting both scientific inquiry and cosmic contemplation into the peculiar synchronicity of eye care and outer space fascination.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles are and The number of optometrists in Nebraska. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"Eye on the Skies: The Correlation Between SciShow Space YouTube Video Titles and Optometrists in Nebraska"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the findings of our research into the puzzling relationship between the professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the number of optometrists in the great state of Nebraska. Our team, comprised of curious individuals with both a knack for data analysis and a taste for quirky correlations, utilized AI analysis of YouTube video titles as well as data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to assess this unconventional connection.
What started as a whimsical investigation turned into a discovery that left us seeing stars – pun intended. The correlation coefficient of 0.9829523 and p < 0.01 for the duration of 2014 to 2022 piqued our interest and led us to delve into the world of celestial eyewear. Our findings suggest a remarkably strong positive correlation between the sophistication level of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the propensity of Nebraskan residents to seek out optometric services.
While the dwindling line between causation and correlation prompted some contemplation over cosmic coincidences, our data could not escape the allure of this surprisingly robust relationship. The implications of our study may seem far-fetched at first glance, but we invite readers to look beyond the conventional boundaries of research and open their eyes to the cosmic comedy that underlies this correlation.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
A number of studies have delved into the connections between language and consumer behaviors, as well as the impact of digital media on various industries. Smith et al. (2016) explored the influence of linguistic sophistication in advertising on consumer purchasing decisions, finding a positive correlation between the two variables. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) conducted a comprehensive analysis of content language in online videos and its association with user engagement, shedding light on the potent influence of linguistic appeal.
Moving beyond the realm of targeted linguistic influence, the impact of technological advancements in the digital age has garnered attention from researchers and practitioners alike. In "The New Digital Age" by Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen, the authors examine the profound effects of digital technologies on various facets of human life, offering insights into the ways in which online platforms shape contemporary behaviors and trends. Likewise, the book "The Tipping Point" by Malcolm Gladwell discusses the pivotal role of small changes and trends in precipitating significant shifts in societal behaviors, providing a broader understanding of the intricate dynamics at play in modern consumer landscapes.
However, as the scope of our investigation meanders into the cosmic conundrum of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the optometric landscape of Nebraska, we must also acknowledge the tangential pearls of wisdom offered by fiction and popular culture. In the realm of literary imagination, works such as "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams and "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan transport readers on whimsical journeys through the cosmos, imparting a sense of wonder and curiosity about the celestial expanse.
And who could forget the cinematic odysseys that have sparked our imaginations and, perhaps, influenced our perceptions of the cosmic realm? Films like "Interstellar" and "Spaceballs" have etched themselves into popular culture, weaving narratives that straddle the line between scientific inquiry and comedic relief. Through their interstellar escapades and cosmic capers, these movies beckon us to contemplate the cosmic coincidences that may lie beyond the mundane world of empirical data.
As we wade through this eclectic mix of literature and media, we are reminded of the multifaceted influences that shape our understanding of language, consumer behavior, and the enigmatic connections that defy conventional explanation. With this broadened perspective, we can approach our investigation with a measure of lighthearted curiosity, daring to peer into the cosmic comedy that may underpin the unexpected correlation between otherworldly YouTube titles and the earthly pursuit of ocular care.
[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis yielded a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.9829523, indicating an exceptionally strong positive relationship between the sophistication level of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the number of optometrists in Nebraska. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9661953, indicating that a substantial proportion of the variability in the number of optometrists can be explained by the sophistication of the YouTube video titles. The p-value of less than 0.01 solidifies the statistical significance of this correlation, providing compelling evidence to support our findings.
Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between the two variables, further reinforcing the strength of the relationship. The scatterplot clearly demonstrates a positively sloped trend line, affirming the close association between the eloquence of SciShow Space video titles and the prevalence of optometric services in Nebraska. It appears that as the linguistic sophistication of the video titles increases, so does the demand for optometric care in the state, creating an intriguing juxtaposition of cosmic curiosity and ocular health.
These robust statistical results not only confirm the presence of a compelling association but also highlight the remarkable coherence between the themes of interstellar exploration and the terrestrial pursuit of visual acuity. While one might initially perceive this correlation as an astronomical anomaly, our data ceaselessly beckons us to embrace the cosmic comedy that underlies this unexpected relationship.
Our results stand as a testament to the consequential interplay between the realm of astronomy-themed content and the tangible demand for optometric services, inviting us to marvel at the whimsical intricacies that intertwine the celestial and the earthly. Through the lens of our findings, a new frontier of inquiry emerges, inviting both scientific inquiry and cosmic contemplation into the peculiar synchronicity of eye care and outer space fascination.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The findings of our research have illuminated a celestial correlation between the linguistic sophistication of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the prevalence of optometric services in Nebraska. The statistical robustness of the correlation coefficient (r = 0.9829523) and its consequential p-value of less than 0.01 not only support our hypothesis but also beckon us to peer into the cosmic comedy that underlies this unexpected relationship.
Our investigation delved into the uncharted territory of quirky correlations, channeling the spirit of whimsy and intellectual inquiry to unravel the interplay between astral allurement and ocular wellness. Taking a lighthearted stance amidst empirical rigor, we were compelled to ponder the potential influence of cosmic curiosity on the terrestrial pursuit of visual acuity.
Returning to the literature review, we noted the works of Smith et al. (2016) and Doe and Jones (2018), which explored the influence of linguistic sophistication in advertising and online videos, respectively. Our findings align with the implications of these studies, further emphasizing the sway of language and linguistic appeal on consumer behavior. We are left to marvel at the whimsical intricacies that intertwine the celestial and the earthly, as our results stand as a testament to the cosmic coincidence that binds interstellar exploration and ocular health.
In our foray into cosmic conundrums, we cannot overlook the tangential pearls of wisdom offered by fiction and popular culture, as acknowledged in the literature review. The works of Douglas Adams and Carl Sagan, alongside cinematic odysseys such as "Interstellar," and "Spaceballs," have etched themselves into the fabric of our investigation, framing the interplay between scientific inquiry and comedic relief. In embracing the cosmic comedy of our findings, we are beckoned to consider the innate allure of the celestial expanse and its improbable intersection with the pursuit of comprehensive eye care.
As we tread the cosmic tightrope between empirical data and lighthearted musings, our study presents a call to expand the boundaries of conventional research, inviting both scientific inquiry and cosmic contemplation into the peculiar synchronicity of eye care and outer space fascination. The implications of our findings may seem far-fetched at first glance, but they propel us to look beyond the mundane and embrace the cosmic comedy that threads the celestial and the terrestrial in unexpected ways.
Alas, as we navigate this cosmic dance of correlations and comedic coincidences, our investigation inspires a newfound appreciation for the celestial allure that transcends the boundaries of empirical inquiry. We invite readers to join us in this cosmic comedy, where the interstellar and the ocular converge in a cosmic ballet that both entertains and enlightens.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles are and The number of optometrists in Nebraska. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Eye on the Skies: The Correlation Between SciShow Space YouTube Video Titles and Optometrists in Nebraska"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present the findings of our research into the puzzling relationship between the professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the number of optometrists in the great state of Nebraska. Our team, comprised of curious individuals with both a knack for data analysis and a taste for quirky correlations, utilized AI analysis of YouTube video titles as well as data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to assess this unconventional connection.
What started as a whimsical investigation turned into a discovery that left us seeing stars – pun intended. The correlation coefficient of 0.9829523 and p < 0.01 for the duration of 2014 to 2022 piqued our interest and led us to delve into the world of celestial eyewear. Our findings suggest a remarkably strong positive correlation between the sophistication level of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the propensity of Nebraskan residents to seek out optometric services.
While the dwindling line between causation and correlation prompted some contemplation over cosmic coincidences, our data could not escape the allure of this surprisingly robust relationship. The implications of our study may seem far-fetched at first glance, but we invite readers to look beyond the conventional boundaries of research and open their eyes to the cosmic comedy that underlies this correlation.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of whimsy and wonder, of data analysis and optical anomalies, has led us into a cosmic voyage of discovery. Our investigation into the relationship between the eloquence of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the prevalence of optometrists in the heartland of Nebraska has been nothing short of eye-opening - pardon the pun.
The allure of delving into the depths of this peculiar correlation was irresistible, much like a pair of stylish, space-themed spectacles catching the eye of an adventurous stargazer. While the rational mind may initially scoff at the idea of a connection between astronomy-themed YouTube titles and the provision of eye care services in the Cornhusker State, our data paints a compelling picture.
As we embarked on this odyssey of unconventional research, our team of intrepid investigators sought to bring a touch of levity to the often serious world of data analysis. We harnessed the power of artificial intelligence to dissect the linguistic nuances of SciShow Space video titles and sifted through the Bureau of Labor Statistics' treasure trove of data on optometric professionals in Nebraska. The resulting correlation coefficient of 0.9829523 and p < 0.01 sent us into a spin, all while keeping our feet firmly planted on the ground – or, in this case, our eyes fixed on the sky.
The findings of our rigorous analysis suggest a remarkably robust positive correlation between the sophistication level of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the proclivity of Nebraskan residents to seek out optometric care. It's as if the mesmerizing allure of cosmic phenomena, as encapsulated in the stylish verbiage of video titles, serves as a celestial beacon guiding individuals towards the realm of ocular health.
This study dances along the delicate line between correlation and causation, inviting contemplation on the cosmic coincidences that permeate our universe. We are acutely aware of the inherent whimsy underlying this investigation, but our data refuses to be dismissed as a mere cosmic quirk. The implications of our findings transcend the boundaries of conventional research, urging us to look beyond the mundane and embrace the cosmic comedy that underscores this enigmatic correlation.
So, buckle up and don your metaphorical astronomical eyewear as we journey through the cosmos of YouTube titles and optometric destinies, where the unexpected connections between the stars and the spectacle-wearers reveal a universe of mirth and mystery.
[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis yielded a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.9829523, indicating an exceptionally strong positive relationship between the sophistication level of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the number of optometrists in Nebraska. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9661953, indicating that a substantial proportion of the variability in the number of optometrists can be explained by the sophistication of the YouTube video titles. The p-value of less than 0.01 solidifies the statistical significance of this correlation, providing compelling evidence to support our findings.
Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between the two variables, further reinforcing the strength of the relationship. The scatterplot clearly demonstrates a positively sloped trend line, affirming the close association between the eloquence of SciShow Space video titles and the prevalence of optometric services in Nebraska. It appears that as the linguistic sophistication of the video titles increases, so does the demand for optometric care in the state, creating an intriguing juxtaposition of cosmic curiosity and ocular health.
These robust statistical results not only confirm the presence of a compelling association but also highlight the remarkable coherence between the themes of interstellar exploration and the terrestrial pursuit of visual acuity. While one might initially perceive this correlation as an astronomical anomaly, our data ceaselessly beckons us to embrace the cosmic comedy that underlies this unexpected relationship.
Our results stand as a testament to the consequential interplay between the realm of astronomy-themed content and the tangible demand for optometric services, inviting us to marvel at the whimsical intricacies that intertwine the celestial and the earthly. Through the lens of our findings, a new frontier of inquiry emerges, inviting both scientific inquiry and cosmic contemplation into the peculiar synchronicity of eye care and outer space fascination.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our research has unveiled a cosmic correlation between the eloquence of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the prevalence of optometrists in Nebraska that is as clear as 20/20 vision. The statistically robust relationship, supported by a correlation coefficient of 0.9829523 and a p-value of less than 0.01, has left us seeing stars – both figuratively and literally.
As we wrap up this astronomical escapade, it becomes evident that the allure of celestial phenomena extends beyond the confines of the night sky and into the realm of ocular health. The whimsical juxtaposition of cosmic curiosity and eye care has given us a unique perspective – one that invites us to marvel at the unexpected connections that permeate our universe.
While we are tempted to gaze further into this cosmic comedy, our findings compel us to recognize that the universe has already bestowed upon us a celestial gift in the form of this correlation. Therefore, we assert that no further research is needed in this area; instead, we encourage others to join us in embracing the cosmic whimsy that underlies this enigmatic relationship.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Eye on the Skies: The Correlation Between SciShow Space YouTube Video Titles and Optometrists in Nebraska. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Astronomical Optics
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Eye on the Skies: The Correlation Between SciShow Space YouTube Video Titles and Optometrists in Nebraska. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Cosmic Vision and Optical Insights
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Eye on the Skies: The Correlation Between SciShow Space YouTube Video Titles and Optometrists in Nebraska with an abstract of In this paper, we present the findings of our research into the puzzling relationship between the professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the number of optometrists in the great state of Nebraska. Our team, comprised of curious individuals with both a knack for data analysis and a taste for quirky correlations, utilized AI analysis of YouTube video titles as well as data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to assess this unconventional connection.
What started as a whimsical investigation turned into a discovery that left us seeing stars – pun intended. The correlation coefficient of 0.9829523 and p < 0.01 for the duration of 2014 to 2022 piqued our interest and led us to delve into the world of celestial eyewear. Our findings suggest a remarkably strong positive correlation between the sophistication level of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the propensity of Nebraskan residents to seek out optometric services.
While the dwindling line between causation and correlation prompted some contemplation over cosmic coincidences, our data could not escape the allure of this surprisingly robust relationship. The implications of our study may seem far-fetched at first glance, but we invite readers to look beyond the conventional boundaries of research and open their eyes to the cosmic comedy that underlies this correlation.
ChatGPT:
SciShow Space, YouTube video titles, optometrists in Nebraska, correlation, AI analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, celestial eyewear, sophistication level, Nebraskan residents, optometric services
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
How professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles areDetailed data title: How professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.
See what else correlates with How professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles are
The number of optometrists in Nebraska
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of optometrists in Nebraska
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of optometrists in Nebraska
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9661953 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 96.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of optometrists in Nebraska) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles are) over the 9 years from 2014 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.09E-6. 0.0000020948061082757854000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 0.000209% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 477,371 random variables You don't actually need 477 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.92, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
How professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles are (Score (out of 10)) | 7.6579 | 7.5962 | 7.7333 | 7.875 | 8.0388 | 7.9806 | 7.9608 | 7.8061 | 7.5376 |
The number of optometrists in Nebraska (Optometrists) | 310 | 300 | 350 | 450 | 530 | 480 | 460 | 420 | 290 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
- Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7.6579,7.5962,7.7333,7.875,8.0388,7.9806,7.9608,7.8061,7.5376,])
array_2 = np.array([310,300,350,450,530,480,460,420,290,])
array_1_name = "How professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "The number of optometrists in Nebraska"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only How professional-sounding SciShow Space YouTube video titles are
- Line chart for only The number of optometrists in Nebraska
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Eye on the Skies: The Correlation Between SciShow Space YouTube Video Titles and Optometrists in Nebraska
Thanks for being the explorer we needed!
Correlation ID: 5415 · Black Variable ID: 25675 · Red Variable ID: 10931