about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,395 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arizona and the second variable is Number of websites on the internet.  The chart goes from 1991 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more people supported the Libertarian candidate, they also supported the idea of independence and non-restriction. This led to a surge in creating new websites, free from the constraints of traditional political affiliations. The momentum for looser control and individual freedom spilled over into the digital realm, prompting a rapid expansion of online content. It's as if every vote cast for the Libertarian candidate was a vote for the unrestricted growth of the internet!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a vast, interconnected digital network expanding across the Arizona desert. Each surge in libertarian votes triggers the formation of a new website, represented by glowing nodes connected by intricate, glowing pathways. The network should convey a sense of burgeoning digital independence and unrestricted growth, with the desert landscape serving as a backdrop for this evolving cyber-ecosystem. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arizona and Number of websites on the internet. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Data cyber art 3D Pixar Style Cyber folk Concept art Cyber folk
ChatGPT: Data cyber art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arizona and Number of websites on the internet, in the following situation: As more people supported the Libertarian candidate, they also supported the idea of independence and non-restriction. This led to a surge in creating new websites, free from the constraints of traditional political affiliations. The momentum for looser control and individual freedom spilled over into the digital realm, prompting a rapid expansion of online content. It's as if every vote cast for the Libertarian candidate was a vote for the unrestricted growth of the internet!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Arizona, as the votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate surged, the number of websites on the internet also rapidly expanded. It's as if each vote for the Libertarian candidate sparked a new website to bloom, signaling a wave of unrestricted growth and digital independence.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Data cyber art ] and depicting this scene: In Arizona, as the votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate surged, the number of websites on the internet also rapidly expanded. It's as if each vote for the Libertarian candidate sparked a new website to bloom, signaling a wave of unrestricted growth and digital independence. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a vast, interconnected digital network expanding across the Arizona desert. Each surge in libertarian votes triggers the formation of a new website, represented by glowing nodes connected by intricate, glowing pathways. The network should convey a sense of burgeoning digital independence and unrestricted growth, with the desert landscape serving as a backdrop for this evolving cyber-ecosystem.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arizona caused Number of websites on the internet to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Web of Libertarians: Examining the Connection Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Arizona and the Number of Websites on the Internet

The Journal of Cyber Political Ecology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arizona and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Internet Live Stats to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8985294 and p < 0.01 for 1991 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Web of Libertarians: Examining the Connection Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Arizona and the Number of Websites on the Internet

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intricate web of connections between political preferences and cyberspace by exploring the correlation between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 1991 to 2018. The results revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8985294 and p < 0.01, shedding light on the tangled relationship between internet presence and political inclinations. Our findings not only provide valuable insights into technological and political landscapes but also highlight the unforeseen interplay between digital domains and democratic decisions.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arizona and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Web of Libertarians: Examining the Connection Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Arizona and the Number of Websites on the Internet

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intricate web of connections between political preferences and cyberspace by exploring the correlation between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 1991 to 2018. The results revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8985294 and p < 0.01, shedding light on the tangled relationship between internet presence and political inclinations. Our findings not only provide valuable insights into technological and political landscapes but also highlight the unforeseen interplay between digital domains and democratic decisions.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

As we navigate the digital age, the intricate interplay between technology and society becomes increasingly apparent. With the proliferation of websites and the ever-expanding online landscape, the digital realm has become an integral part of modern life – a virtual arena where ideas, opinions, and memes collide in a cacophony of cat videos and conspiracy theories. At the same time, the political climate has seen its fair share of turbulence, with traditional paradigms being shaken and new ideologies weaving their way into the fabric of democracy.

It is within this complex and ever-changing backdrop that we set out to explore the correlation between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona. Like intrepid detectives of the digital domain, we sought to unravel the tangled web of connections between technological prevalence and political proclivities. Armed with data from reputable sources – the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats – we embarked on a quest to scrutinize the relationship that lies beneath the surface of the world wide web.

Our journey through the annals of statistical analysis and political intrigue has brought forth unexpected findings that challenge traditional assumptions and shed light on the peculiar dynamics of the cyber-political landscape. Through a comprehensive analysis spanning nearly three decades, covering the years from 1991 to 2018, we emerged with a correlation coefficient that would make even the most hardened statistician do a double-take – a staggering 0.8985294, coupled with a significance level that would make any p-value envious, with p < 0.01.

Join us as we embark on a quest to untangle the mysteries of cyberspace and political preferences, and emerge with insights that not only deepen our understanding of the webbed world we inhabit but also provide a dash of unexpected humor and intrigue – because what's science without a few surprises and a sprinkling of internet-induced amusement?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arizona and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Web of Libertarians: Examining the Connection Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Arizona and the Number of Websites on the Internet

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intricate web of connections between political preferences and cyberspace by exploring the correlation between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 1991 to 2018. The results revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8985294 and p < 0.01, shedding light on the tangled relationship between internet presence and political inclinations. Our findings not only provide valuable insights into technological and political landscapes but also highlight the unforeseen interplay between digital domains and democratic decisions.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
As we navigate the digital age, the intricate interplay between technology and society becomes increasingly apparent. With the proliferation of websites and the ever-expanding online landscape, the digital realm has become an integral part of modern life – a virtual arena where ideas, opinions, and memes collide in a cacophony of cat videos and conspiracy theories. At the same time, the political climate has seen its fair share of turbulence, with traditional paradigms being shaken and new ideologies weaving their way into the fabric of democracy.
It is within this complex and ever-changing backdrop that we set out to explore the correlation between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona. Like intrepid detectives of the digital domain, we sought to unravel the tangled web of connections between technological prevalence and political proclivities. Armed with data from reputable sources – the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats – we embarked on a quest to scrutinize the relationship that lies beneath the surface of the world wide web.
Our journey through the annals of statistical analysis and political intrigue has brought forth unexpected findings that challenge traditional assumptions and shed light on the peculiar dynamics of the cyber-political landscape. Through a comprehensive analysis spanning nearly three decades, covering the years from 1991 to 2018, we emerged with a correlation coefficient that would make even the most hardened statistician do a double-take – a staggering 0.8985294, coupled with a significance level that would make any p-value envious, with p < 0.01.
Join us as we embark on a quest to untangle the mysteries of cyberspace and political preferences, and emerge with insights that not only deepen our understanding of the webbed world we inhabit but also provide a dash of unexpected humor and intrigue – because what's science without a few surprises and a sprinkling of internet-induced amusement?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between technological advancements and political behavior has intrigued scholars for decades, prompting an exploration of uncharted territory at the intersection of cyberspace and democratic processes. While existing literature has largely focused on the impact of social media and online platforms on political engagement, our study delves into the uncharted waters of website proliferation and its potential influence on voting patterns, specifically with regard to the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona.

Smith (2016) delves into the implications of digital presence and its influence on voter behavior, shedding light on the significant role played by online platforms in shaping political opinions. Doe (2018) extends this line of inquiry by examining the ways in which digital spaces facilitate the dissemination of alternative political ideologies, thereby influencing electoral outcomes.

Turning our attention to the broader context of technological proliferation, Jones (2019) emphasizes the ubiquity of the internet in modern society, highlighting its profound impact on various facets of human behavior, including political preferences.

In "The Age of the Internet" by Williams (2017), the author discusses the transformative effects of the internet on society, touching upon its potential influence on political allegiances and engagement. Similarly, "The Web That Connects Us" by Brown (2015) explores the intricate network of online spaces and the ways in which they intersect with individuals' political inclinations.

On a more lighthearted note, fiction books such as "The Internet Paradox" by Green (2003) and "Digital Democracy" by Taylor (2011) provide thought-provoking narratives that, while not steeped in empirical evidence, offer imaginative insights into the potential whimsical and wacky ways in which the internet may intersect with political landscapes.

In the world of television, programs such as "The Social Dilemma" and "Black Mirror" offer captivating glimpses into the intertwined realms of technology and society, with possible implications for political engagement and decision-making processes. These fictional explorations, while not rooted in academic rigor, provide entertaining narratives that prompt contemplation on the potential influence of cyberspace on political preferences.

While these sources offer valuable perspectives on the interplay between technology and politics, our study takes a unique approach by specifically examining the connection between the number of websites on the internet and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona. With a touch of humor and a sprinkle of unexpected insight, our findings aim to unravel the webbed mysteries of cyberspace and political proclivities, offering a fresh perspective on the dynamic interplay between digital domains and democratic decisions.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arizona and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Internet Live Stats . You used data from 1991 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Web of Libertarians: Examining the Connection Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Arizona and the Number of Websites on the Internet

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intricate web of connections between political preferences and cyberspace by exploring the correlation between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 1991 to 2018. The results revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8985294 and p < 0.01, shedding light on the tangled relationship between internet presence and political inclinations. Our findings not only provide valuable insights into technological and political landscapes but also highlight the unforeseen interplay between digital domains and democratic decisions.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
As we navigate the digital age, the intricate interplay between technology and society becomes increasingly apparent. With the proliferation of websites and the ever-expanding online landscape, the digital realm has become an integral part of modern life – a virtual arena where ideas, opinions, and memes collide in a cacophony of cat videos and conspiracy theories. At the same time, the political climate has seen its fair share of turbulence, with traditional paradigms being shaken and new ideologies weaving their way into the fabric of democracy.
It is within this complex and ever-changing backdrop that we set out to explore the correlation between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona. Like intrepid detectives of the digital domain, we sought to unravel the tangled web of connections between technological prevalence and political proclivities. Armed with data from reputable sources – the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats – we embarked on a quest to scrutinize the relationship that lies beneath the surface of the world wide web.
Our journey through the annals of statistical analysis and political intrigue has brought forth unexpected findings that challenge traditional assumptions and shed light on the peculiar dynamics of the cyber-political landscape. Through a comprehensive analysis spanning nearly three decades, covering the years from 1991 to 2018, we emerged with a correlation coefficient that would make even the most hardened statistician do a double-take – a staggering 0.8985294, coupled with a significance level that would make any p-value envious, with p < 0.01.
Join us as we embark on a quest to untangle the mysteries of cyberspace and political preferences, and emerge with insights that not only deepen our understanding of the webbed world we inhabit but also provide a dash of unexpected humor and intrigue – because what's science without a few surprises and a sprinkling of internet-induced amusement?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
The data for this study were collected from various sources, including the esteemed repositories of MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats. These sources provided a wealth of information spanning the years 1991 to 2018, allowing us to delve deep into the digital archives and extract the hidden nuggets of statistical intrigue. Our team combed through the digital haystack, carefully selecting data points that would best elucidate the connection between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona. And let me tell you, sifting through terabytes of data sure felt like searching for a pixelated needle in a digital haystack!

Variable Selection:
In order to encapsulate the essence of our inquiry, we zeroed in on two key variables for our analysis. The first variable, the number of websites on the internet, served as a measure of the digital domain's vastness, capturing the sprawling expanse of cyberspace. Meanwhile, the second variable, the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona, offered a glimpse into the political leanings of a state known for its bold desert landscapes and sizzling political fervor. These variables, though divergent in their essence, coalesced to form the nexus of our investigation, interweaving the digital and political fabrics into a seamless, if not slightly tangled, tapestry of data.

Statistical Analysis:
To unravel the complex relationship between our chosen variables, we employed a robust statistical approach, including measures of central tendency, dispersion, and a correlation analysis. Our quest for meaning in the data led us to the sprawling realm of correlation coefficients, where we unearthed a surprising value of 0.8985294. This coefficient, akin to a digital handshake between two seemingly disparate entities, echoed with significance (p < 0.01), accentuating the profoundness of the unseen connections that underpin the digital and political domains. Indeed, it's as if the data were whispering to us, "Look at me, I may be just a string of zeroes and ones, but I've got a secret to tell!"

Procedural Quirks:
It's worth noting that our journey through the labyrinthine pathways of statistical analysis was not without its quirks. The delicate art of data wrangling and the precise choreography of statistical computations often veered into the surreal, with our team occasionally feeling like digital alchemists transmuting raw data into nuggets of statistical gold. And let's not forget the occasional debugging session, where we braved the treacherous forests of programming syntax errors, emerging with battle scars and a newfound appreciation for the resilience of both humans and machines.

Ethical Considerations:
Throughout our expedition into the digital and political realms, we upheld the principles of ethical conduct, ensuring the integrity and confidentiality of the data at every turn. Our pursuit of knowledge was guided by the unwavering commitment to transparency and rigor, akin to a beacon shining through the digital fog, guiding us toward the shores of statistical enlightenment. We navigated the obstacles of potential biases and confounding variables with the precision of seasoned navigators, mindful of the ever-present currents that could sway the course of our analysis.

In summary, our methodology amalgamated the precision of statistical analysis with the whimsical nature of digital exploration, yielding insights that transcend the boundaries of disciplines and embrace the inherent complexity of the webbed world we inhabit. So, join us as we unravel the mysteries of cyberspace and political preferences, and emerge with a tapestry of insights that spark curiosity and ignite the spirit of inquiry – for what's research without a dash of intellectual adventure and a sprinkling of statistical serendipity?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arizona and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Internet Live Stats .

For the time period 1991 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.8985294, r-squared of 0.8073550, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Web of Libertarians: Examining the Connection Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Arizona and the Number of Websites on the Internet

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intricate web of connections between political preferences and cyberspace by exploring the correlation between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 1991 to 2018. The results revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8985294 and p < 0.01, shedding light on the tangled relationship between internet presence and political inclinations. Our findings not only provide valuable insights into technological and political landscapes but also highlight the unforeseen interplay between digital domains and democratic decisions.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
As we navigate the digital age, the intricate interplay between technology and society becomes increasingly apparent. With the proliferation of websites and the ever-expanding online landscape, the digital realm has become an integral part of modern life – a virtual arena where ideas, opinions, and memes collide in a cacophony of cat videos and conspiracy theories. At the same time, the political climate has seen its fair share of turbulence, with traditional paradigms being shaken and new ideologies weaving their way into the fabric of democracy.
It is within this complex and ever-changing backdrop that we set out to explore the correlation between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona. Like intrepid detectives of the digital domain, we sought to unravel the tangled web of connections between technological prevalence and political proclivities. Armed with data from reputable sources – the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats – we embarked on a quest to scrutinize the relationship that lies beneath the surface of the world wide web.
Our journey through the annals of statistical analysis and political intrigue has brought forth unexpected findings that challenge traditional assumptions and shed light on the peculiar dynamics of the cyber-political landscape. Through a comprehensive analysis spanning nearly three decades, covering the years from 1991 to 2018, we emerged with a correlation coefficient that would make even the most hardened statistician do a double-take – a staggering 0.8985294, coupled with a significance level that would make any p-value envious, with p < 0.01.
Join us as we embark on a quest to untangle the mysteries of cyberspace and political preferences, and emerge with insights that not only deepen our understanding of the webbed world we inhabit but also provide a dash of unexpected humor and intrigue – because what's science without a few surprises and a sprinkling of internet-induced amusement?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our investigation into the relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona has yielded intriguing results. After diligently sifting through the data from 1991 to 2018, we discovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8985294, suggesting a robust association between these two seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.8073550 further emphasizes the substantial proportion of variance in the votes for the Libertarian candidate that can be explained by the number of websites on the internet.

In support of our statistical findings, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by random chance alone. These results not only underscore the significance of the relationship uncovered but also emphasize the need to delve deeper into the multifaceted influences of the digital landscape on political preferences.

Furthermore, Fig. 1 illustrates the visually striking nature of this correlation through a scatterplot, depicting a clear and compelling pattern between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona. The strength of the correlation is vividly represented in the scattering of data points, lending visual credence to the numerical findings.

These results not only highlight the unexpected intersections between cyberspace and political inclinations but also serve as a gentle reminder that in the vast expanse of the internet, even the most unforeseen connections may lurk. The web of libertarians, it seems, extends far beyond the confines of computer screens and into the intricacies of electoral decisions.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arizona and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Web of Libertarians: Examining the Connection Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Arizona and the Number of Websites on the Internet

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intricate web of connections between political preferences and cyberspace by exploring the correlation between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 1991 to 2018. The results revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8985294 and p < 0.01, shedding light on the tangled relationship between internet presence and political inclinations. Our findings not only provide valuable insights into technological and political landscapes but also highlight the unforeseen interplay between digital domains and democratic decisions.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between technological advancements and political behavior has intrigued scholars for decades, prompting an exploration of uncharted territory at the intersection of cyberspace and democratic processes. While existing literature has largely focused on the impact of social media and online platforms on political engagement, our study delves into the uncharted waters of website proliferation and its potential influence on voting patterns, specifically with regard to the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona.
Smith (2016) delves into the implications of digital presence and its influence on voter behavior, shedding light on the significant role played by online platforms in shaping political opinions. Doe (2018) extends this line of inquiry by examining the ways in which digital spaces facilitate the dissemination of alternative political ideologies, thereby influencing electoral outcomes.
Turning our attention to the broader context of technological proliferation, Jones (2019) emphasizes the ubiquity of the internet in modern society, highlighting its profound impact on various facets of human behavior, including political preferences.
In "The Age of the Internet" by Williams (2017), the author discusses the transformative effects of the internet on society, touching upon its potential influence on political allegiances and engagement. Similarly, "The Web That Connects Us" by Brown (2015) explores the intricate network of online spaces and the ways in which they intersect with individuals' political inclinations.
On a more lighthearted note, fiction books such as "The Internet Paradox" by Green (2003) and "Digital Democracy" by Taylor (2011) provide thought-provoking narratives that, while not steeped in empirical evidence, offer imaginative insights into the potential whimsical and wacky ways in which the internet may intersect with political landscapes.
In the world of television, programs such as "The Social Dilemma" and "Black Mirror" offer captivating glimpses into the intertwined realms of technology and society, with possible implications for political engagement and decision-making processes. These fictional explorations, while not rooted in academic rigor, provide entertaining narratives that prompt contemplation on the potential influence of cyberspace on political preferences.
While these sources offer valuable perspectives on the interplay between technology and politics, our study takes a unique approach by specifically examining the connection between the number of websites on the internet and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona. With a touch of humor and a sprinkle of unexpected insight, our findings aim to unravel the webbed mysteries of cyberspace and political proclivities, offering a fresh perspective on the dynamic interplay between digital domains and democratic decisions.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona has yielded intriguing results. After diligently sifting through the data from 1991 to 2018, we discovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8985294, suggesting a robust association between these two seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.8073550 further emphasizes the substantial proportion of variance in the votes for the Libertarian candidate that can be explained by the number of websites on the internet.
In support of our statistical findings, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by random chance alone. These results not only underscore the significance of the relationship uncovered but also emphasize the need to delve deeper into the multifaceted influences of the digital landscape on political preferences.
Furthermore, Fig. 1 illustrates the visually striking nature of this correlation through a scatterplot, depicting a clear and compelling pattern between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona. The strength of the correlation is vividly represented in the scattering of data points, lending visual credence to the numerical findings.
These results not only highlight the unexpected intersections between cyberspace and political inclinations but also serve as a gentle reminder that in the vast expanse of the internet, even the most unforeseen connections may lurk. The web of libertarians, it seems, extends far beyond the confines of computer screens and into the intricacies of electoral decisions.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

Our study uncovers a tantalizingly strong correlation between the number of websites on the internet and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona, echoing the musings of Green (2003) in "The Internet Paradox" and Taylor (2011) in "Digital Democracy," albeit within a more conventionally empirical framework. The substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8985294 speaks to the surprisingly intertwined nature of digital domains and political proclivities, reaffirming the whimsical and wacky ways in which the internet may intersect with political landscapes as hinted in these lighthearted narratives. While at first glance, the connection between internet presence and political preferences may seem far-fetched, our results undeniably foreground the profound influence of digital spaces on electoral outcomes.

The strength of our correlation, akin to the strapping biceps of a statistical model, suggests that the cyberspace sprawl and libertarian leanings are more than mere happenstance. The p-value below 0.01 humorously nudges the null hypothesis off the stage, affirming that this peculiar correlation is no statistical fluke. It appears that in the labyrinth that is the internet, the web of libertarians weaves its way through the vast expanse of digital pathways, infiltrating the political landscapes in surprising and unforeseen ways.

Our findings echo the sentiment of Doe (2018) by emphasizing the potential influence of digital spaces in shaping alternative political ideologies, while drawing attention to the broader context of technological proliferation outlined by Jones (2019) and Williams (2017). Much like the captivating narratives of "The Social Dilemma" and "Black Mirror," albeit firmly rooted in the domain of empirical evidence, our study provides compelling insights into the entangled realms of technology and society. As we untangle this web of libertarians, it becomes apparent that the synergistic relationship between digital dominion and democratic decisions may be more intricate than previously envisioned.

In line with these findings, it is imperative to contemplate the implications of our research for not only the political arena but also the ever-evolving digital landscape. The unexpected concordance between the number of websites on the internet and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona not only enriches our understanding of the interplay between technology and politics but also ignites curiosity about the myriad unexplored connections that may reside within the labyrinthine expanse of cyberspace. Indeed, in the midst of digital proliferation, the spheres of politics and online presence seem to intertwine in mysterious and amusing ways, inviting further exploration into the webbed mysteries of the internet.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arizona and Number of websites on the internet. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Web of Libertarians: Examining the Connection Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Arizona and the Number of Websites on the Internet

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intricate web of connections between political preferences and cyberspace by exploring the correlation between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 1991 to 2018. The results revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8985294 and p < 0.01, shedding light on the tangled relationship between internet presence and political inclinations. Our findings not only provide valuable insights into technological and political landscapes but also highlight the unforeseen interplay between digital domains and democratic decisions.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
As we navigate the digital age, the intricate interplay between technology and society becomes increasingly apparent. With the proliferation of websites and the ever-expanding online landscape, the digital realm has become an integral part of modern life – a virtual arena where ideas, opinions, and memes collide in a cacophony of cat videos and conspiracy theories. At the same time, the political climate has seen its fair share of turbulence, with traditional paradigms being shaken and new ideologies weaving their way into the fabric of democracy.
It is within this complex and ever-changing backdrop that we set out to explore the correlation between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona. Like intrepid detectives of the digital domain, we sought to unravel the tangled web of connections between technological prevalence and political proclivities. Armed with data from reputable sources – the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats – we embarked on a quest to scrutinize the relationship that lies beneath the surface of the world wide web.
Our journey through the annals of statistical analysis and political intrigue has brought forth unexpected findings that challenge traditional assumptions and shed light on the peculiar dynamics of the cyber-political landscape. Through a comprehensive analysis spanning nearly three decades, covering the years from 1991 to 2018, we emerged with a correlation coefficient that would make even the most hardened statistician do a double-take – a staggering 0.8985294, coupled with a significance level that would make any p-value envious, with p < 0.01.
Join us as we embark on a quest to untangle the mysteries of cyberspace and political preferences, and emerge with insights that not only deepen our understanding of the webbed world we inhabit but also provide a dash of unexpected humor and intrigue – because what's science without a few surprises and a sprinkling of internet-induced amusement?

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the relationship between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona has yielded intriguing results. After diligently sifting through the data from 1991 to 2018, we discovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8985294, suggesting a robust association between these two seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.8073550 further emphasizes the substantial proportion of variance in the votes for the Libertarian candidate that can be explained by the number of websites on the internet.
In support of our statistical findings, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by random chance alone. These results not only underscore the significance of the relationship uncovered but also emphasize the need to delve deeper into the multifaceted influences of the digital landscape on political preferences.
Furthermore, Fig. 1 illustrates the visually striking nature of this correlation through a scatterplot, depicting a clear and compelling pattern between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona. The strength of the correlation is vividly represented in the scattering of data points, lending visual credence to the numerical findings.
These results not only highlight the unexpected intersections between cyberspace and political inclinations but also serve as a gentle reminder that in the vast expanse of the internet, even the most unforeseen connections may lurk. The web of libertarians, it seems, extends far beyond the confines of computer screens and into the intricacies of electoral decisions.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our study has unearthed a remarkable correlation between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona. The striking correlation coefficient of 0.8985294 and the p-value of less than 0.01 not only speak volumes about the unforeseen intertwining of the digital domain and political preferences but also evoke a sense of wonder akin to stumbling upon a rare meme in the depths of the world wide web.

The findings from our research traverse the realms of both science and amusement, much like a whimsical tweet from a political pundit. The scatterplot, akin to a visual meme, portrays the unmistakable pattern of this correlation, serving as a visual reminder that in the vast expanse of statistical analysis, unexpected connections can emerge much like a cat video amidst a sea of serious political discourse.

As we reflect on the results, our insights not only enrich the fields of political science and data analysis but also impart a dash of light-hearted amusement, reminiscent of stumbling upon a quirky subreddit in the vast expanse of the internet. It appears that the web of libertarians extends far beyond the confines of traditional political landscapes and into the intricate tapestry of technological prevalence.

In light of these findings, we assert that further research in this area may lead to diminishing returns, much like trying to find a needle in the haystack of internet memes. Therefore, we conclude that the correlation between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona has been sufficiently illuminated, leaving little room for further exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Web of Libertarians: Examining the Connection Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Arizona and the Number of Websites on the Internet. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Cyber Political Ecology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Web of Libertarians: Examining the Connection Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Arizona and the Number of Websites on the Internet. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Consortium for Eccentric Research and Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Web of Libertarians: Examining the Connection Between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential Candidate in Arizona and the Number of Websites on the Internet with an abstract of This study delves into the intricate web of connections between political preferences and cyberspace by exploring the correlation between the number of websites on the internet and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Arizona. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Internet Live Stats, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 1991 to 2018. The results revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8985294 and p < 0.01, shedding light on the tangled relationship between internet presence and political inclinations. Our findings not only provide valuable insights into technological and political landscapes but also highlight the unforeseen interplay between digital domains and democratic decisions.

ChatGPT:

Libertarian, Presidential candidate, Arizona, votes, websites, internet, correlation, political preferences, cyberspace, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Internet Live Stats, analysis, correlation coefficient, political inclinations, technological landscapes, political landscapes, democratic decisions

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arizona
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arizona
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arizona

Number of websites on the internet
Detailed data title: Number of websites, measured by unique hostnames
Source: Internet Live Stats
See what else correlates with Number of websites on the internet

Correlation r = 0.8985294 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8073550 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 80.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Number of websites on the internet) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arizona) over the 7 years from 1991 through 2018.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.006. 0.0059604460264722865000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 0.6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 168 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 6 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 6 because we have two variables measured over a period of 7 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.45, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1992199620002004200820122016
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arizona (Percentage of votes)0.4545471.022350.3769540.5890930.5474231.396114.13215
Number of websites on the internet (Websites)1025760117087200516116001723390006970890001045530000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.454547,1.02235,0.376954,0.589093,0.547423,1.39611,4.13215,])
array_2 = np.array([10,257601,17087200,51611600,172339000,697089000,1045530000,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Arizona"
array_2_name = "Number of websites on the internet"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 5395 · Black Variable ID: 26056 · Red Variable ID: 370
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0