about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,353 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How trendy Steve Mould's YouTube video titles are and the second variable is Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers.  The chart goes from 2017 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The more Steve Mould's video titles resonate with current trends, the greater the influence on the Chargers' defensive play. It seems the team just can't resist following the latest 'charged' trends to stay current on the field. As Mould's video titles spark a 'shocking' amount of interest, the Chargers' points allowed 'volt' up, showing that even in football, you can't escape the 'electric' pull of trendy content.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image depicting a brightly lit modern stadium atmosphere with the Los Angeles Chargers' defensive line in action on the field. Above them, a massive digital screen displays YouTube video titles of Steve Mould, featuring popular trending topics and catchy phrases. As the titles capture the audience's attention, the Chargers' points allowed start to surge, illuminated by flashes of electric blue lightning, showcasing the undeniable impact of trendy content on their defensive play. The visual should focus on capturing the energy and intensity of the scene, emphasizing the digital screen and the Chargers' defensive line in action. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How trendy Steve Mould's YouTube video titles are and Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy art illustration Photorealism Macabre Oragami Symbolism
ChatGPT: Photorealism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How trendy Steve Mould's YouTube video titles are and Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers, in the following situation: The more Steve Mould's video titles resonate with current trends, the greater the influence on the Chargers' defensive play. It seems the team just can't resist following the latest 'charged' trends to stay current on the field. As Mould's video titles spark a 'shocking' amount of interest, the Chargers' points allowed 'volt' up, showing that even in football, you can't escape the 'electric' pull of trendy content. . Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bright, modern stadium, the Los Angeles Chargers' defensive line is seen in action on the field. Above them, a massive digital screen displays the YouTube video titles of Steve Mould, featuring popular trending topics and catchy phrases. As the titles capture the attention of the audience, the Chargers' points allowed start to surge, illuminated by bright flashes of electric blue lightning, showcasing the undeniable impact of trendy content on their defensive play.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Photorealism ] and depicting this scene: In a bright, modern stadium, the Los Angeles Chargers' defensive line is seen in action on the field. Above them, a massive digital screen displays the YouTube video titles of Steve Mould, featuring popular trending topics and catchy phrases. As the titles capture the attention of the audience, the Chargers' points allowed start to surge, illuminated by bright flashes of electric blue lightning, showcasing the undeniable impact of trendy content on their defensive play. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image depicting a brightly lit modern stadium atmosphere with the Los Angeles Chargers' defensive line in action on the field. Above them, a massive digital screen displays YouTube video titles of Steve Mould, featuring popular trending topics and catchy phrases. As the titles capture the audience's attention, the Chargers' points allowed start to surge, illuminated by flashes of electric blue lightning, showcasing the undeniable impact of trendy content on their defensive play. The visual should focus on capturing the energy and intensity of the scene, emphasizing the digital screen and the Chargers' defensive line in action.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in How trendy Steve Mould YouTube video titles are caused Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Trending with Touchdowns: A Correlative Analysis of How Steve Mould's YouTube Video Titles Impact the Los Angeles Chargers' Points Allowed

Journal of Sports Analytics and Popular Culture

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How trendy Steve Mould YouTube video titles are and Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Pro-Football-Reference.com to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8980309 and p < 0.01 for 2017 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Trending with Touchdowns: A Correlative Analysis of How Steve Mould's YouTube Video Titles Impact the Los Angeles Chargers' Points Allowed

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aims to investigate the intriguing connection between the trendiness of Steve Mould's YouTube video titles and the points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers in professional football games. Data from 2017 to 2023 were subjected to AI analysis of YouTube video titles and extracted from Pro-Football-Reference.com to establish a correlation coefficient of 0.8980309 and p < 0.01. Our findings suggest a striking relationship between the whimsical creativity of YouTube video titles and the Chargers' performance on the field, prompting further investigation into the potential influence of viral trends on sports outcomes. Our research not only illuminates the unexpected interplay of digital media trends and sports statistics but also provides a lighthearted look at the impact of online content on real-world athletic endeavors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How trendy Steve Mould YouTube video titles are and Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Trending with Touchdowns: A Correlative Analysis of How Steve Mould's YouTube Video Titles Impact the Los Angeles Chargers' Points Allowed

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aims to investigate the intriguing connection between the trendiness of Steve Mould's YouTube video titles and the points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers in professional football games. Data from 2017 to 2023 were subjected to AI analysis of YouTube video titles and extracted from Pro-Football-Reference.com to establish a correlation coefficient of 0.8980309 and p < 0.01. Our findings suggest a striking relationship between the whimsical creativity of YouTube video titles and the Chargers' performance on the field, prompting further investigation into the potential influence of viral trends on sports outcomes. Our research not only illuminates the unexpected interplay of digital media trends and sports statistics but also provides a lighthearted look at the impact of online content on real-world athletic endeavors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of sports and digital media has been a topic of increasing interest in recent years. As the online landscape continues to evolve, so too do the ways in which it interacts with traditional spheres such as professional sports. One such intriguing intersection is the potential influence of YouTube video titles, particularly those of Steve Mould, on the performance of the Los Angeles Chargers in the National Football League (NFL).

While the relationship between online content and athletic outcomes may seem like an unconventional area of study, the realm of sports is no stranger to the unexpected and peculiar. From pre-game rituals to post-game interviews, sports enthusiasts are well-acquainted with the idiosyncrasies that can impact an athlete's performance. It is within this backdrop that our research seeks to shed light on the unexplored connection between the trendy, attention-grabbing YouTube video titles created by Steve Mould and the points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers.

The aim of this study is not merely to entertain the reader with a curious juxtaposition of digital trends and athletic statistics, but rather to analyze the underlying correlation and potential causation between these seemingly disparate realms. Through the application of rigorous data analysis techniques and statistical methodologies, we endeavor to establish a robust and compelling argument for the influence of YouTube video titles on the performance of a professional sports team.

Amidst the customary seriousness of academic research, we recognize the unconventional nature of this investigation. However, as researchers, we aspire to approach every subject with unyielding curiosity and an openness to uncovering unexpected insights. In this spirit, we invite the reader to embark on this exploratory journey, where the empirical and the eccentric converge in a delightful fusion of digital culture and athletic prowess.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How trendy Steve Mould YouTube video titles are and Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Trending with Touchdowns: A Correlative Analysis of How Steve Mould's YouTube Video Titles Impact the Los Angeles Chargers' Points Allowed

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aims to investigate the intriguing connection between the trendiness of Steve Mould's YouTube video titles and the points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers in professional football games. Data from 2017 to 2023 were subjected to AI analysis of YouTube video titles and extracted from Pro-Football-Reference.com to establish a correlation coefficient of 0.8980309 and p < 0.01. Our findings suggest a striking relationship between the whimsical creativity of YouTube video titles and the Chargers' performance on the field, prompting further investigation into the potential influence of viral trends on sports outcomes. Our research not only illuminates the unexpected interplay of digital media trends and sports statistics but also provides a lighthearted look at the impact of online content on real-world athletic endeavors.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of sports and digital media has been a topic of increasing interest in recent years. As the online landscape continues to evolve, so too do the ways in which it interacts with traditional spheres such as professional sports. One such intriguing intersection is the potential influence of YouTube video titles, particularly those of Steve Mould, on the performance of the Los Angeles Chargers in the National Football League (NFL).
While the relationship between online content and athletic outcomes may seem like an unconventional area of study, the realm of sports is no stranger to the unexpected and peculiar. From pre-game rituals to post-game interviews, sports enthusiasts are well-acquainted with the idiosyncrasies that can impact an athlete's performance. It is within this backdrop that our research seeks to shed light on the unexplored connection between the trendy, attention-grabbing YouTube video titles created by Steve Mould and the points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers.
The aim of this study is not merely to entertain the reader with a curious juxtaposition of digital trends and athletic statistics, but rather to analyze the underlying correlation and potential causation between these seemingly disparate realms. Through the application of rigorous data analysis techniques and statistical methodologies, we endeavor to establish a robust and compelling argument for the influence of YouTube video titles on the performance of a professional sports team.
Amidst the customary seriousness of academic research, we recognize the unconventional nature of this investigation. However, as researchers, we aspire to approach every subject with unyielding curiosity and an openness to uncovering unexpected insights. In this spirit, we invite the reader to embark on this exploratory journey, where the empirical and the eccentric converge in a delightful fusion of digital culture and athletic prowess.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between digital media trends and athletic performance has been the subject of growing interest in recent years. In their study, Smith and Doe (2018) found a positive correlation between social media engagement and spectator attendance at live sporting events, shedding light on the potential impact of online trends on the traditional realm of sports. Similarly, Jones et al. (2020) examined the influence of Twitter hashtags on athlete endorsement deals, revealing the far-reaching implications of digital content on the economics of sports marketing.

Turning to the domain of YouTube content, the works of White (2017) and Black (2019) have delved into the psychological mechanisms underlying audience engagement with video titles. Their research emphasizes the role of attention-grabbing and trendy titles in capturing viewers' interest, implicating these factors in the virality of online content. This body of literature sets the stage for our investigation into the connection between Steve Mould's YouTube video titles and the performance of the Los Angeles Chargers in professional football games.

Expanding the scope to include non-fiction books, "Digital Media and Sports: Betting on the Future" by Gray (2016) and "Trends and Touchdowns: An Analysis of Online Virality in Sports" by Green (2019) provide valuable insights into the evolving landscape of sports media in the digital age. These works underscore the dynamic and interactive nature of online platforms, paving the way for our exploration of the unexpected link between digital trends and sports statistics.

In the realm of fiction, "The Touchdown Algorithm" by Redfield (2015) and "Viral Victories: The YouTube Chronicles" by Blue (2017) present imaginative narratives that, while not grounded in empirical research, evoke the whimsical spirit of our inquiry into the potential influence of Steve Mould's video titles on the performance of the Chargers. These literary works serve as a lighthearted complement to our rigorous empirical analysis, infusing an element of playfulness into the academic discourse.

Going beyond traditional academic sources, our literature review also encompasses unconventional sources of insight. Notably, a thorough analysis of seemingly unrelated materials, including grocery store receipts, fortune cookie messages, and even the enigmatic recommendations of a magic eight ball, has provided unexpected perspectives on the interplay between digital media trends and sports outcomes. While these sources may not adhere to conventional scholarly standards, their inclusion reflects our commitment to embracing diverse avenues of knowledge exploration and cultivating an open-minded approach to research inquiry.

With this expansive foundation of literature, our investigation into the relationship between the trendiness of Steve Mould's YouTube video titles and the points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers undertakes a comprehensive synthesis of empirical findings, imaginative narratives, and unconventional perspectives. In the ensuing sections, we present our own empirical analysis, uniting the serious and the jovial in a scholarly exploration of the unexpected interconnection between digital trends and athletic performance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How trendy Steve Mould YouTube video titles are and Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Pro-Football-Reference.com . You used data from 2017 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Trending with Touchdowns: A Correlative Analysis of How Steve Mould's YouTube Video Titles Impact the Los Angeles Chargers' Points Allowed

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aims to investigate the intriguing connection between the trendiness of Steve Mould's YouTube video titles and the points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers in professional football games. Data from 2017 to 2023 were subjected to AI analysis of YouTube video titles and extracted from Pro-Football-Reference.com to establish a correlation coefficient of 0.8980309 and p < 0.01. Our findings suggest a striking relationship between the whimsical creativity of YouTube video titles and the Chargers' performance on the field, prompting further investigation into the potential influence of viral trends on sports outcomes. Our research not only illuminates the unexpected interplay of digital media trends and sports statistics but also provides a lighthearted look at the impact of online content on real-world athletic endeavors.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of sports and digital media has been a topic of increasing interest in recent years. As the online landscape continues to evolve, so too do the ways in which it interacts with traditional spheres such as professional sports. One such intriguing intersection is the potential influence of YouTube video titles, particularly those of Steve Mould, on the performance of the Los Angeles Chargers in the National Football League (NFL).
While the relationship between online content and athletic outcomes may seem like an unconventional area of study, the realm of sports is no stranger to the unexpected and peculiar. From pre-game rituals to post-game interviews, sports enthusiasts are well-acquainted with the idiosyncrasies that can impact an athlete's performance. It is within this backdrop that our research seeks to shed light on the unexplored connection between the trendy, attention-grabbing YouTube video titles created by Steve Mould and the points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers.
The aim of this study is not merely to entertain the reader with a curious juxtaposition of digital trends and athletic statistics, but rather to analyze the underlying correlation and potential causation between these seemingly disparate realms. Through the application of rigorous data analysis techniques and statistical methodologies, we endeavor to establish a robust and compelling argument for the influence of YouTube video titles on the performance of a professional sports team.
Amidst the customary seriousness of academic research, we recognize the unconventional nature of this investigation. However, as researchers, we aspire to approach every subject with unyielding curiosity and an openness to uncovering unexpected insights. In this spirit, we invite the reader to embark on this exploratory journey, where the empirical and the eccentric converge in a delightful fusion of digital culture and athletic prowess.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
The data collection process involved a comprehensive gathering of YouTube video titles created by the renowned science communicator, Steve Mould, from the years 2017 to 2023. The selection of Steve Mould as the focal point of the study stemmed from his unique blend of scientific knowledge and engaging presentation style, which has garnered a substantial following on the platform. The Pro-Football-Reference.com database was utilized to obtain detailed records of the Los Angeles Chargers' points allowed in each NFL game during the same period. The integration of these disparate sources of information aimed to capture the ethereal essence of digital trends and the hard-hitting reality of professional football statistics.

AI Analysis:
The extracted YouTube video titles were subjected to advanced AI analysis, which employed a blend of natural language processing and trend prediction algorithms to discern the level of trendiness and attention-grabbing qualities of each title. This process involved parsing through linguistic nuances, cultural references, and meme-based elements to gauge the potential impact of the titles in capturing the fleeting attention of digital denizens. The resulting trendiness scores provided a quantitative measure of the titular pizzazz that Steve Mould exudes in his content, encapsulating the zeitgeist of the online realm.

Statistical Analysis:
To elucidate the connection between the trendiness of Steve Mould's YouTube video titles and the performance of the Los Angeles Chargers, a rigorous statistical analysis was conducted. The correlation coefficient, symbolized by the enigmatic "r," was employed to investigate the strength and direction of the relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables. The utilization of this analytical tool allowed for the assessment of the degree to which variations in YouTube video title trendiness corresponded with the fluctuations in the points allowed by the Chargers. Furthermore, the p-value, a stalwart companion of statistical significance, was activated to discern the veracity of the observed association.

Control Variables:
In the pursuit of scientific rigor, several control variables were identified and incorporated into the analysis to mitigate confounding influences. Factors such as game location, weather conditions, team composition, and the culinary preferences of the coaching staff were considered as potential sources of variance in the points allowed by the Chargers. The systematic inclusion of these variables aimed to fortify the robustness of the examination by distinguishing the specific impact of YouTube video title trendiness amidst the tumultuous maelstrom of sportive phenomena.

Ethical Considerations:
As staunch proponents of ethical conduct in research, our team ensured the ethical harvesting of data from public sources, with due respect for intellectual property rights and the integrity of digital creators. The utilization of AI algorithms in the analysis of YouTube video titles adhered to ethical guidelines in data processing, safeguarding against the unwarranted propagation of algorithmic biases and preserving the sanctity of online content.

In summary, the methodology deployed in this study engaged in a whimsical dance between the magnetism of digital trends and the stoic sturdiness of sports statistics, culminating in an earnest endeavor to decipher the enigmatic symbiosis between YouTube video titles and the performance of the Los Angeles Chargers.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How trendy Steve Mould YouTube video titles are and Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Pro-Football-Reference.com .

For the time period 2017 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8980309, r-squared of 0.8064596, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Trending with Touchdowns: A Correlative Analysis of How Steve Mould's YouTube Video Titles Impact the Los Angeles Chargers' Points Allowed

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aims to investigate the intriguing connection between the trendiness of Steve Mould's YouTube video titles and the points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers in professional football games. Data from 2017 to 2023 were subjected to AI analysis of YouTube video titles and extracted from Pro-Football-Reference.com to establish a correlation coefficient of 0.8980309 and p < 0.01. Our findings suggest a striking relationship between the whimsical creativity of YouTube video titles and the Chargers' performance on the field, prompting further investigation into the potential influence of viral trends on sports outcomes. Our research not only illuminates the unexpected interplay of digital media trends and sports statistics but also provides a lighthearted look at the impact of online content on real-world athletic endeavors.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of sports and digital media has been a topic of increasing interest in recent years. As the online landscape continues to evolve, so too do the ways in which it interacts with traditional spheres such as professional sports. One such intriguing intersection is the potential influence of YouTube video titles, particularly those of Steve Mould, on the performance of the Los Angeles Chargers in the National Football League (NFL).
While the relationship between online content and athletic outcomes may seem like an unconventional area of study, the realm of sports is no stranger to the unexpected and peculiar. From pre-game rituals to post-game interviews, sports enthusiasts are well-acquainted with the idiosyncrasies that can impact an athlete's performance. It is within this backdrop that our research seeks to shed light on the unexplored connection between the trendy, attention-grabbing YouTube video titles created by Steve Mould and the points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers.
The aim of this study is not merely to entertain the reader with a curious juxtaposition of digital trends and athletic statistics, but rather to analyze the underlying correlation and potential causation between these seemingly disparate realms. Through the application of rigorous data analysis techniques and statistical methodologies, we endeavor to establish a robust and compelling argument for the influence of YouTube video titles on the performance of a professional sports team.
Amidst the customary seriousness of academic research, we recognize the unconventional nature of this investigation. However, as researchers, we aspire to approach every subject with unyielding curiosity and an openness to uncovering unexpected insights. In this spirit, we invite the reader to embark on this exploratory journey, where the empirical and the eccentric converge in a delightful fusion of digital culture and athletic prowess.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of the correlative analysis revealed a notably high correlation coefficient of 0.8980309 (p < 0.01) between How trendy Steve Mould YouTube video titles are and Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers over the period of 2017 to 2023. This strong correlation suggests a compelling relationship between the whimsical creativity of YouTube video titles and the performance of the Chargers on the gridiron. The r-squared value of 0.8064596 further emphasizes the robustness of this connection, indicating that approximately 80.65% of the variability in points allowed by the Chargers can be explained by the trendiness of Steve Mould's YouTube video titles.

The findings from this analysis serve as a captivating illumination of the unexpected interplay between digital media trends and real-world athletic outcomes. While the implications of this correlation may prompt a chuckle or raise an eyebrow, the statistical rigor underpinning these results is undeniably sound.

Figure 1 provides a compelling visual depiction of the relationship between the trendiness of Steve Mould's YouTube video titles and the points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. As indicated in the scatterplot, a clear positive trend emerges, with higher trendiness of video titles corresponding to an increase in points allowed by the Chargers. This graphical representation serves as a light-hearted yet visually impactful testament to the intriguing connection unearthed in our investigation.

In light of these striking results, further exploration into the potential impact of viral trends on sports outcomes is warranted. While this analysis does not establish causation, the robustness of the correlation offers a compelling foundation for continued inquiry into the unforeseen influences shaping athletic performance in the digital age.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How trendy Steve Mould YouTube video titles are and Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Trending with Touchdowns: A Correlative Analysis of How Steve Mould's YouTube Video Titles Impact the Los Angeles Chargers' Points Allowed

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aims to investigate the intriguing connection between the trendiness of Steve Mould's YouTube video titles and the points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers in professional football games. Data from 2017 to 2023 were subjected to AI analysis of YouTube video titles and extracted from Pro-Football-Reference.com to establish a correlation coefficient of 0.8980309 and p < 0.01. Our findings suggest a striking relationship between the whimsical creativity of YouTube video titles and the Chargers' performance on the field, prompting further investigation into the potential influence of viral trends on sports outcomes. Our research not only illuminates the unexpected interplay of digital media trends and sports statistics but also provides a lighthearted look at the impact of online content on real-world athletic endeavors.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between digital media trends and athletic performance has been the subject of growing interest in recent years. In their study, Smith and Doe (2018) found a positive correlation between social media engagement and spectator attendance at live sporting events, shedding light on the potential impact of online trends on the traditional realm of sports. Similarly, Jones et al. (2020) examined the influence of Twitter hashtags on athlete endorsement deals, revealing the far-reaching implications of digital content on the economics of sports marketing.
Turning to the domain of YouTube content, the works of White (2017) and Black (2019) have delved into the psychological mechanisms underlying audience engagement with video titles. Their research emphasizes the role of attention-grabbing and trendy titles in capturing viewers' interest, implicating these factors in the virality of online content. This body of literature sets the stage for our investigation into the connection between Steve Mould's YouTube video titles and the performance of the Los Angeles Chargers in professional football games.
Expanding the scope to include non-fiction books, "Digital Media and Sports: Betting on the Future" by Gray (2016) and "Trends and Touchdowns: An Analysis of Online Virality in Sports" by Green (2019) provide valuable insights into the evolving landscape of sports media in the digital age. These works underscore the dynamic and interactive nature of online platforms, paving the way for our exploration of the unexpected link between digital trends and sports statistics.
In the realm of fiction, "The Touchdown Algorithm" by Redfield (2015) and "Viral Victories: The YouTube Chronicles" by Blue (2017) present imaginative narratives that, while not grounded in empirical research, evoke the whimsical spirit of our inquiry into the potential influence of Steve Mould's video titles on the performance of the Chargers. These literary works serve as a lighthearted complement to our rigorous empirical analysis, infusing an element of playfulness into the academic discourse.
Going beyond traditional academic sources, our literature review also encompasses unconventional sources of insight. Notably, a thorough analysis of seemingly unrelated materials, including grocery store receipts, fortune cookie messages, and even the enigmatic recommendations of a magic eight ball, has provided unexpected perspectives on the interplay between digital media trends and sports outcomes. While these sources may not adhere to conventional scholarly standards, their inclusion reflects our commitment to embracing diverse avenues of knowledge exploration and cultivating an open-minded approach to research inquiry.
With this expansive foundation of literature, our investigation into the relationship between the trendiness of Steve Mould's YouTube video titles and the points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers undertakes a comprehensive synthesis of empirical findings, imaginative narratives, and unconventional perspectives. In the ensuing sections, we present our own empirical analysis, uniting the serious and the jovial in a scholarly exploration of the unexpected interconnection between digital trends and athletic performance.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of the correlative analysis revealed a notably high correlation coefficient of 0.8980309 (p < 0.01) between How trendy Steve Mould YouTube video titles are and Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers over the period of 2017 to 2023. This strong correlation suggests a compelling relationship between the whimsical creativity of YouTube video titles and the performance of the Chargers on the gridiron. The r-squared value of 0.8064596 further emphasizes the robustness of this connection, indicating that approximately 80.65% of the variability in points allowed by the Chargers can be explained by the trendiness of Steve Mould's YouTube video titles.
The findings from this analysis serve as a captivating illumination of the unexpected interplay between digital media trends and real-world athletic outcomes. While the implications of this correlation may prompt a chuckle or raise an eyebrow, the statistical rigor underpinning these results is undeniably sound.
Figure 1 provides a compelling visual depiction of the relationship between the trendiness of Steve Mould's YouTube video titles and the points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. As indicated in the scatterplot, a clear positive trend emerges, with higher trendiness of video titles corresponding to an increase in points allowed by the Chargers. This graphical representation serves as a light-hearted yet visually impactful testament to the intriguing connection unearthed in our investigation.
In light of these striking results, further exploration into the potential impact of viral trends on sports outcomes is warranted. While this analysis does not establish causation, the robustness of the correlation offers a compelling foundation for continued inquiry into the unforeseen influences shaping athletic performance in the digital age.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study have unveiled a compelling correlation between the trendiness of Steve Mould's YouTube video titles and the points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers, underscoring the unexpected interplay of digital media trends and athletic performance. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8980309 and a significant p-value of < 0.01 corroborate the notion that the whimsical creativity of YouTube video titles is closely intertwined with the Chargers' performance on the field.

Our results align with prior research on the influence of digital media trends on sports outcomes. Smith and Doe (2018) highlighted the impact of social media engagement on spectator attendance, pointing to the broader reach of online trends in traditional sports realms. Similarly, the work of White (2017) and Black (2019) hint at the psychological mechanisms underlying audience engagement with video titles, supporting our finding of the relationship between trendy video titles and sports statistics. And who could forget the insightful touch of the magical eight ball, with its enigmatic recommendations that, in retrospect, seem surprisingly prescient in shedding light on this emerging unique correlation.

Expanding on the unexpected link between Steve Mould's YouTube video titles and the performance of the Chargers, our study provides a unique perspective on the influence of viral trends on sports outcomes. While our findings may initially appear whimsical, the statistical rigor underpinning these results is indisputable, akin to a perfectly executed end zone dance. Our work not only contributes to the scholarly discourse on the dynamic landscape of digital media and sports but also serves as a lighthearted reminder of the multifaceted interconnections that define contemporary life.

Our investigation sets the stage for continued exploration into the potential impact of online content on real-world athletic endeavors, inviting further inquiry into the unforeseen influences shaping sports performance in the digital age. As we move forward, it is imperative to maintain both a rigorous scholarly approach and an open-minded embrace of diverse avenues of knowledge exploration, ensuring that our understanding of the intricate relationship between digital trends and athletic outcomes remains as dynamic and multifaceted as the phenomenon itself.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How trendy Steve Mould YouTube video titles are and Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Trending with Touchdowns: A Correlative Analysis of How Steve Mould's YouTube Video Titles Impact the Los Angeles Chargers' Points Allowed

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aims to investigate the intriguing connection between the trendiness of Steve Mould's YouTube video titles and the points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers in professional football games. Data from 2017 to 2023 were subjected to AI analysis of YouTube video titles and extracted from Pro-Football-Reference.com to establish a correlation coefficient of 0.8980309 and p < 0.01. Our findings suggest a striking relationship between the whimsical creativity of YouTube video titles and the Chargers' performance on the field, prompting further investigation into the potential influence of viral trends on sports outcomes. Our research not only illuminates the unexpected interplay of digital media trends and sports statistics but also provides a lighthearted look at the impact of online content on real-world athletic endeavors.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of sports and digital media has been a topic of increasing interest in recent years. As the online landscape continues to evolve, so too do the ways in which it interacts with traditional spheres such as professional sports. One such intriguing intersection is the potential influence of YouTube video titles, particularly those of Steve Mould, on the performance of the Los Angeles Chargers in the National Football League (NFL).
While the relationship between online content and athletic outcomes may seem like an unconventional area of study, the realm of sports is no stranger to the unexpected and peculiar. From pre-game rituals to post-game interviews, sports enthusiasts are well-acquainted with the idiosyncrasies that can impact an athlete's performance. It is within this backdrop that our research seeks to shed light on the unexplored connection between the trendy, attention-grabbing YouTube video titles created by Steve Mould and the points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers.
The aim of this study is not merely to entertain the reader with a curious juxtaposition of digital trends and athletic statistics, but rather to analyze the underlying correlation and potential causation between these seemingly disparate realms. Through the application of rigorous data analysis techniques and statistical methodologies, we endeavor to establish a robust and compelling argument for the influence of YouTube video titles on the performance of a professional sports team.
Amidst the customary seriousness of academic research, we recognize the unconventional nature of this investigation. However, as researchers, we aspire to approach every subject with unyielding curiosity and an openness to uncovering unexpected insights. In this spirit, we invite the reader to embark on this exploratory journey, where the empirical and the eccentric converge in a delightful fusion of digital culture and athletic prowess.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of the correlative analysis revealed a notably high correlation coefficient of 0.8980309 (p < 0.01) between How trendy Steve Mould YouTube video titles are and Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers over the period of 2017 to 2023. This strong correlation suggests a compelling relationship between the whimsical creativity of YouTube video titles and the performance of the Chargers on the gridiron. The r-squared value of 0.8064596 further emphasizes the robustness of this connection, indicating that approximately 80.65% of the variability in points allowed by the Chargers can be explained by the trendiness of Steve Mould's YouTube video titles.
The findings from this analysis serve as a captivating illumination of the unexpected interplay between digital media trends and real-world athletic outcomes. While the implications of this correlation may prompt a chuckle or raise an eyebrow, the statistical rigor underpinning these results is undeniably sound.
Figure 1 provides a compelling visual depiction of the relationship between the trendiness of Steve Mould's YouTube video titles and the points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers. As indicated in the scatterplot, a clear positive trend emerges, with higher trendiness of video titles corresponding to an increase in points allowed by the Chargers. This graphical representation serves as a light-hearted yet visually impactful testament to the intriguing connection unearthed in our investigation.
In light of these striking results, further exploration into the potential impact of viral trends on sports outcomes is warranted. While this analysis does not establish causation, the robustness of the correlation offers a compelling foundation for continued inquiry into the unforeseen influences shaping athletic performance in the digital age.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the findings of our study present a, shall we say, electrifying connection between the trendiness of Steve Mould's YouTube video titles and the performance of the Los Angeles Chargers on the football field. The remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8980309 (p < 0.01) has truly shocked and charged the academic community, shedding light on the unexpected interplay of digital media trends and sports statistics. This connection, while initially sparking skepticism, has proven to be as potent as a well-executed touchdown pass.

The results not only provide a whimsical window into the potential impact of viral trends on sports outcomes but also offer a refreshing reminder that even in the realm of rigorous statistical analysis, there is room for an occasional curveball. The visually striking scatterplot in Figure 1 serves as a touchdown dance, celebrating the amusing yet robust relationship between the trendiness of YouTube video titles and the points allowed by the Chargers.

While we acknowledge the unconventional nature of this investigation, we stand by the validity and reliability of our findings. As we close this chapter of research, we assert with confidence that further inquiry into this captivating nexus of digital culture and athletic performance is unwarranted. The high correlation coefficient and compelling r-squared value leave little doubt that the impact of Steve Mould's video titles on the Chargers' performance is a field well and truly explored.

In the grand arena of sports and digital media, our study adds a quirky yet undeniably intriguing chapter, demonstrating that even in the most unexpected of places, there may lie a statistical touchdown waiting to be uncovered.

No more research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Trending with Touchdowns: A Correlative Analysis of How Steve Mould's YouTube Video Titles Impact the Los Angeles Chargers' Points Allowed. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Sports Analytics and Popular Culture


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Trending with Touchdowns: A Correlative Analysis of How Steve Mould's YouTube Video Titles Impact the Los Angeles Chargers' Points Allowed. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Contemporary Media Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Trending with Touchdowns: A Correlative Analysis of How Steve Mould's YouTube Video Titles Impact the Los Angeles Chargers' Points Allowed with an abstract of This study aims to investigate the intriguing connection between the trendiness of Steve Mould's YouTube video titles and the points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers in professional football games. Data from 2017 to 2023 were subjected to AI analysis of YouTube video titles and extracted from Pro-Football-Reference.com to establish a correlation coefficient of 0.8980309 and p < 0.01. Our findings suggest a striking relationship between the whimsical creativity of YouTube video titles and the Chargers' performance on the field, prompting further investigation into the potential influence of viral trends on sports outcomes. Our research not only illuminates the unexpected interplay of digital media trends and sports statistics but also provides a lighthearted look at the impact of online content on real-world athletic endeavors.

ChatGPT:

Steve Mould, YouTube video titles, Los Angeles Chargers, points allowed, correlation analysis, AI analysis, Pro-Football-Reference.com, trendiness, viral trends, sports outcomes, digital media trends, sports statistics, online content, athletic endeavors

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How trendy Steve Mould's YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How trendy Steve Mould YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How trendy Steve Mould's YouTube video titles are

Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers
Detailed data title: Total points the Los Angeles Chargers allowed their opponents to score during the year
Source: Pro-Football-Reference.com
See what else correlates with Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers

Correlation r = 0.8980309 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8064596 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 80.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How trendy Steve Mould's YouTube video titles are) over the 7 years from 2017 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00603. 0.0060322451279225435000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 0.603% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 166 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 6 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 6 because we have two variables measured over a period of 7 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.45, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2017201820192020202120222023
How trendy Steve Mould's YouTube video titles are (Trendiness score)5.256.06675.68186.14716.56.055.8846
Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers (Chargers points)272329345426459384345




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([5.25,6.0667,5.6818,6.1471,6.5,6.05,5.8846,])
array_2 = np.array([272,329,345,426,459,384,345,])
array_1_name = "How trendy Steve Mould's YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Points allowed by the Los Angeles Chargers"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 5353 · Black Variable ID: 25539 · Red Variable ID: 19724
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0