Download png, svg
AI explanation
As more households bought fresh milk and cream, there was a rise in moustache maintenance. This led to an influx of dairy-loving, smooth-talking politicians on the campaign trail, swaying Nebraskan voters towards the Democrat candidate. It seems dairy really does do a political body good!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a minimalist grocery store scene in Nebraska, with happy households purchasing cartons of fresh milk and cream. Show the smooth-talking politicians with well-maintained mustaches charming voters at a local rally nearby. Ensure that the scene portrays the mix of clinking milk bottles and the hum of political chatter, with the atmosphere being increasingly influenced by the dairy-loving, smooth-talking politicians, leading to a surge in votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate. Ensure that the image doesn't include any words or speech bubbles but captures the essence of the bustling store and campaign rally. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Woodblock painting Minimalism Cyberpunk Parallax art Psychedelic
ChatGPT: Minimalism
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska, in the following situation: As more households bought fresh milk and cream, there was a rise in moustache maintenance. This led to an influx of dairy-loving, smooth-talking politicians on the campaign trail, swaying Nebraskan voters towards the Democrat candidate. It seems dairy really does do a political body good!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Picture a scene in Nebraska where happy households are purchasing cartons of fresh milk and cream at a bustling grocery store. Meanwhile, smooth-talking politicians with well-maintained mustaches are charming voters at a local campaign rally. The sound of clinking milk bottles mixes with the hum of political chatter, as the atmosphere becomes increasingly influenced by the dairy-loving, smooth-talking politicians, leading to a surge in votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Minimalism ] and depicting this scene: Picture a scene in Nebraska where happy households are purchasing cartons of fresh milk and cream at a bustling grocery store. Meanwhile, smooth-talking politicians with well-maintained mustaches are charming voters at a local campaign rally. The sound of clinking milk bottles mixes with the hum of political chatter, as the atmosphere becomes increasingly influenced by the dairy-loving, smooth-talking politicians, leading to a surge in votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a minimalist grocery store scene in Nebraska, with happy households purchasing cartons of fresh milk and cream. Show the smooth-talking politicians with well-maintained mustaches charming voters at a local rally nearby. Ensure that the scene portrays the mix of clinking milk bottles and the hum of political chatter, with the atmosphere being increasingly influenced by the dairy-loving, smooth-talking politicians, leading to a surge in votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate. Ensure that the image doesn't include any words or speech bubbles but captures the essence of the bustling store and campaign rally.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream caused Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Nebraska to increase.
AI academic paper
Moo-litical Milk Money: The Magnificent Marriage of Milk and Democratic Votes in Nebraska The Bovine Behavioral Journal Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Nebraska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title an alliteration.
Your research team used data from Bureau of Labor Statistics and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8598945 and p < 0.05 for 2000 to 2020.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Moo-litical Milk Money: The Magnificent Marriage of Milk and Democratic Votes in Nebraska
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examined the potential relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team conducted a thorough assessment of this intriguing connection. Our findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8598945 and a p-value of less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2020, suggesting a statistically significant association. While the classic image of milk being associated with strong bones, could it also be linked to strong electoral support for a particular political party? This unexpected correlation may leave politicians uttering "moo-ve over, we've got the dairy vote!" We present these compelling results as a source of both amusement and potential investigation for future research.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Nebraska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Moo-litical Milk Money: The Magnificent Marriage of Milk and Democratic Votes in Nebraska
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examined the potential relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team conducted a thorough assessment of this intriguing connection. Our findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8598945 and a p-value of less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2020, suggesting a statistically significant association. While the classic image of milk being associated with strong bones, could it also be linked to strong electoral support for a particular political party? This unexpected correlation may leave politicians uttering "moo-ve over, we've got the dairy vote!" We present these compelling results as a source of both amusement and potential investigation for future research.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of politics and dairy consumption is a topic that has been largely overlooked in academic circles. While the traditional association of milk with growth and health has been extensively studied, its potential connection to political preferences has, until now, remained unexplored. In particular, the state of Nebraska has provided an intriguing arena for investigation, with its rich agricultural heritage and pivotal role in the American political landscape.
The dairy industry holds significant sway in the American heartland, known for its production of milk, the primary ingredient in the creation of many a delicious dairy product. Over the years, milk has become not only a staple of the American diet but also a symbol of wholesomeness, eliciting nostalgic imagery of milk mustaches and frothy milkshakes. However, could it also be silently influencing the democratic decisions of the electorate?
The purpose of this study was to shed light on the potential relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska. Our aim was to utilize empirical data and robust statistical analysis to determine if there is a discernible correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. Through the systematic examination of economic and electoral data, we sought to unravel the enigmatic tale of "moo-litical milk money" and the captivating connection it may hold with political allegiance.
As we venture into this uncharted territory of udderly unexpected correlations, we invite readers to join us on this scholarly and, dare I say, milk-curdling journey. The implications of our findings may extend beyond the realms of statistical analysis, providing fodder for lively debates and perhaps even inspiring a few dairy-related puns along the way.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Nebraska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Moo-litical Milk Money: The Magnificent Marriage of Milk and Democratic Votes in Nebraska
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examined the potential relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team conducted a thorough assessment of this intriguing connection. Our findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8598945 and a p-value of less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2020, suggesting a statistically significant association. While the classic image of milk being associated with strong bones, could it also be linked to strong electoral support for a particular political party? This unexpected correlation may leave politicians uttering "moo-ve over, we've got the dairy vote!" We present these compelling results as a source of both amusement and potential investigation for future research.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of politics and dairy consumption is a topic that has been largely overlooked in academic circles. While the traditional association of milk with growth and health has been extensively studied, its potential connection to political preferences has, until now, remained unexplored. In particular, the state of Nebraska has provided an intriguing arena for investigation, with its rich agricultural heritage and pivotal role in the American political landscape.
The dairy industry holds significant sway in the American heartland, known for its production of milk, the primary ingredient in the creation of many a delicious dairy product. Over the years, milk has become not only a staple of the American diet but also a symbol of wholesomeness, eliciting nostalgic imagery of milk mustaches and frothy milkshakes. However, could it also be silently influencing the democratic decisions of the electorate?
The purpose of this study was to shed light on the potential relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska. Our aim was to utilize empirical data and robust statistical analysis to determine if there is a discernible correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. Through the systematic examination of economic and electoral data, we sought to unravel the enigmatic tale of "moo-litical milk money" and the captivating connection it may hold with political allegiance.
As we venture into this uncharted territory of udderly unexpected correlations, we invite readers to join us on this scholarly and, dare I say, milk-curdling journey. The implications of our findings may extend beyond the realms of statistical analysis, providing fodder for lively debates and perhaps even inspiring a few dairy-related puns along the way.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation of the relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska presents a captivating interplay between dietary habits and political inclinations. While the classic image of milk being associated with strong bones has been extensively studied (Smith, 2005), its potential association with electoral support for a particular political party has largely eluded scholarly attention until now. This unexpected correlation challenges conventional assumptions and opens the proverbial barn door to a pasture of intriguing questions and possibilities. As we delve into this uncharted territory, the potential for both amusement and serious inquiry abounds.
Smith et al. (2010) examined the comprehensive health benefits of fresh milk consumption, extolling its virtues as a source of calcium and vitamin D. However, their study did not anticipate its potential role in shaping political landscapes. This unexpected association may prompt one to ponder, "Got milk, got votes?"
Doe and Jones (2016) investigated consumer spending habits in the United States, shedding light on the economic patterns of household expenditure. Yet, their inquiry did not venture into the realms of political correlation, leaving us to wonder whether the phrase "political milk money" should be taken more literally than figuratively.
Turning to the realm of literary inquiry, "Milk and Money: The Intersection of Dairy Economics and Political Power" (Lorem, 2018) provides a thought-provoking exploration of the dairy industry's influence on political decision-making. While this text does not directly address the specific correlation under examination, its title suggests a tantalizing intersection of our research interests.
In the realm of fiction, "Creamy Politics: Utterly Surprising Tales from the Dairy Aisle" (Ipsum, 2020) offers whimsical narratives that may provide unexpected parallels to our real-world inquiry.
Furthermore, children's shows and cartoons such as "The Adventures of Dairy Dave" and "Milkshake Mania" have long depicted the ubiquitous nature of milk in American culture, ingraining the image of dairy products into the minds of young viewers. Could these seemingly innocuous depictions hold a clue to the dairy-democratic connection?
As we navigate through this literature, the unexpected and lighthearted parallels between milk and political preferences begin to emerge, inviting us to ponder whether there is, indeed, a "moo-litical" undercurrent shaping electoral choices. The potential implications of this investigation extend beyond statistical analyses, offering fodder for lively discussions and perhaps even inspiring a few udderly delightful puns along the way.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Nebraska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 2000 to 2020
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Moo-litical Milk Money: The Magnificent Marriage of Milk and Democratic Votes in Nebraska
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examined the potential relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team conducted a thorough assessment of this intriguing connection. Our findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8598945 and a p-value of less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2020, suggesting a statistically significant association. While the classic image of milk being associated with strong bones, could it also be linked to strong electoral support for a particular political party? This unexpected correlation may leave politicians uttering "moo-ve over, we've got the dairy vote!" We present these compelling results as a source of both amusement and potential investigation for future research.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of politics and dairy consumption is a topic that has been largely overlooked in academic circles. While the traditional association of milk with growth and health has been extensively studied, its potential connection to political preferences has, until now, remained unexplored. In particular, the state of Nebraska has provided an intriguing arena for investigation, with its rich agricultural heritage and pivotal role in the American political landscape.
The dairy industry holds significant sway in the American heartland, known for its production of milk, the primary ingredient in the creation of many a delicious dairy product. Over the years, milk has become not only a staple of the American diet but also a symbol of wholesomeness, eliciting nostalgic imagery of milk mustaches and frothy milkshakes. However, could it also be silently influencing the democratic decisions of the electorate?
The purpose of this study was to shed light on the potential relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska. Our aim was to utilize empirical data and robust statistical analysis to determine if there is a discernible correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. Through the systematic examination of economic and electoral data, we sought to unravel the enigmatic tale of "moo-litical milk money" and the captivating connection it may hold with political allegiance.
As we venture into this uncharted territory of udderly unexpected correlations, we invite readers to join us on this scholarly and, dare I say, milk-curdling journey. The implications of our findings may extend beyond the realms of statistical analysis, providing fodder for lively debates and perhaps even inspiring a few dairy-related puns along the way.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To embark on our dairy-laden journey, we engaged in a lively dance with data collection and analysis. Our team left no pasture untouched, scouring the fields of internet repositories and databases to gather the necessary information for our investigation. Data on annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream was diligently procured from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, ensuring that our endeavors were firmly rooted in the fertile soil of economic reality. The delectable electoral data, encompassing votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska, was sourced from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, providing us with a rich, creamy foundation for our analysis.
Upon gathering this cornucopia of data, our first challenge was to wrangle it into a format conducive to statistical scrutiny. The intricacies of data cleaning and wrangling resembled a delicate ballet, as we coaxed the raw numbers into a harmonious ensemble, ensuring that our analytical pas de deux would be executed with precision and grace.
With our meticulously prepared dataset in hand, we delved into the realm of statistical analysis. Utilizing the time-honored method of correlation analysis, we sought to unravel the complex interplay between milk-related expenditures and political preferences. This quantitative tango involved calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient, allowing us to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship between these variables. Furthermore, we danced with the p-value, evaluating its significance in determining the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis.
To ensure the robustness of our findings, we conducted a thorough examination of the data spanning the years 2000 to 2020. This temporal breadth allowed us to capture the evolving dynamics of milk expenditure and political inclinations, providing a comprehensive portrayal of their intertwined narrative over the past two decades.
In our quest to uncover the dairy-scented secrets of political allegiance, we employed a range of statistical tools and techniques, mindful of the need for rigor and methodological integrity in our analysis. Through this multi-faceted methodological approach, we endeavored to milk the data for all its worth, ensuring that our findings would stand as a formidable testament to the udderly captivating connection between milk and democratic votes in Nebraska.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Nebraska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .
For the time period 2000 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8598945, r-squared of 0.7394186, and p < 0.05.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Moo-litical Milk Money: The Magnificent Marriage of Milk and Democratic Votes in Nebraska
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examined the potential relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team conducted a thorough assessment of this intriguing connection. Our findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8598945 and a p-value of less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2020, suggesting a statistically significant association. While the classic image of milk being associated with strong bones, could it also be linked to strong electoral support for a particular political party? This unexpected correlation may leave politicians uttering "moo-ve over, we've got the dairy vote!" We present these compelling results as a source of both amusement and potential investigation for future research.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of politics and dairy consumption is a topic that has been largely overlooked in academic circles. While the traditional association of milk with growth and health has been extensively studied, its potential connection to political preferences has, until now, remained unexplored. In particular, the state of Nebraska has provided an intriguing arena for investigation, with its rich agricultural heritage and pivotal role in the American political landscape.
The dairy industry holds significant sway in the American heartland, known for its production of milk, the primary ingredient in the creation of many a delicious dairy product. Over the years, milk has become not only a staple of the American diet but also a symbol of wholesomeness, eliciting nostalgic imagery of milk mustaches and frothy milkshakes. However, could it also be silently influencing the democratic decisions of the electorate?
The purpose of this study was to shed light on the potential relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska. Our aim was to utilize empirical data and robust statistical analysis to determine if there is a discernible correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. Through the systematic examination of economic and electoral data, we sought to unravel the enigmatic tale of "moo-litical milk money" and the captivating connection it may hold with political allegiance.
As we venture into this uncharted territory of udderly unexpected correlations, we invite readers to join us on this scholarly and, dare I say, milk-curdling journey. The implications of our findings may extend beyond the realms of statistical analysis, providing fodder for lively debates and perhaps even inspiring a few dairy-related puns along the way.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska revealed a striking correlation. Over the time period from 2000 to 2020, our analysis uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8598945, with an r-squared value of 0.7394186 and a p-value of less than 0.05. This suggests a statistically significant association between the two variables, prompting us to ponder the potential influence of dairy consumption on political inclinations.
Figure 1 illustrates this compelling correlation, depicting a scatterplot that unmistakably portrays a strong and positive relationship between household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska. The data points align with remarkable coherence, akin to the harmonious blending of milk and cookies.
These results may expand the scope of traditional political analyses, introducing a novel dimension to the dairy-laden landscape of electoral dynamics. As the classic image of milk being associated with strong bones subtly transforms into an association with strong electoral support for a specific political party, our findings beckon further exploration and scrutiny.
This unexpected correlation may inspire a whimsical reinterpretation of political campaigns, with politicians vying for the coveted "dairy vote" and perhaps even altering their slogans to reflect the newfound significance of milk in the political arena. The implications of our research may extend beyond the statistical realm, sparking lively discussions, and evoking a resounding chorus of "Moo-ve over, we've got the dairy vote!"
Overall, our findings serve as a source of both amusement and contemplation, paving the way for future investigations into the curiously captivating world of "moo-litical milk money."
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Nebraska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Moo-litical Milk Money: The Magnificent Marriage of Milk and Democratic Votes in Nebraska
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examined the potential relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team conducted a thorough assessment of this intriguing connection. Our findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8598945 and a p-value of less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2020, suggesting a statistically significant association. While the classic image of milk being associated with strong bones, could it also be linked to strong electoral support for a particular political party? This unexpected correlation may leave politicians uttering "moo-ve over, we've got the dairy vote!" We present these compelling results as a source of both amusement and potential investigation for future research.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation of the relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska presents a captivating interplay between dietary habits and political inclinations. While the classic image of milk being associated with strong bones has been extensively studied (Smith, 2005), its potential association with electoral support for a particular political party has largely eluded scholarly attention until now. This unexpected correlation challenges conventional assumptions and opens the proverbial barn door to a pasture of intriguing questions and possibilities. As we delve into this uncharted territory, the potential for both amusement and serious inquiry abounds.
Smith et al. (2010) examined the comprehensive health benefits of fresh milk consumption, extolling its virtues as a source of calcium and vitamin D. However, their study did not anticipate its potential role in shaping political landscapes. This unexpected association may prompt one to ponder, "Got milk, got votes?"
Doe and Jones (2016) investigated consumer spending habits in the United States, shedding light on the economic patterns of household expenditure. Yet, their inquiry did not venture into the realms of political correlation, leaving us to wonder whether the phrase "political milk money" should be taken more literally than figuratively.
Turning to the realm of literary inquiry, "Milk and Money: The Intersection of Dairy Economics and Political Power" (Lorem, 2018) provides a thought-provoking exploration of the dairy industry's influence on political decision-making. While this text does not directly address the specific correlation under examination, its title suggests a tantalizing intersection of our research interests.
In the realm of fiction, "Creamy Politics: Utterly Surprising Tales from the Dairy Aisle" (Ipsum, 2020) offers whimsical narratives that may provide unexpected parallels to our real-world inquiry.
Furthermore, children's shows and cartoons such as "The Adventures of Dairy Dave" and "Milkshake Mania" have long depicted the ubiquitous nature of milk in American culture, ingraining the image of dairy products into the minds of young viewers. Could these seemingly innocuous depictions hold a clue to the dairy-democratic connection?
As we navigate through this literature, the unexpected and lighthearted parallels between milk and political preferences begin to emerge, inviting us to ponder whether there is, indeed, a "moo-litical" undercurrent shaping electoral choices. The potential implications of this investigation extend beyond statistical analyses, offering fodder for lively discussions and perhaps even inspiring a few udderly delightful puns along the way.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska revealed a striking correlation. Over the time period from 2000 to 2020, our analysis uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8598945, with an r-squared value of 0.7394186 and a p-value of less than 0.05. This suggests a statistically significant association between the two variables, prompting us to ponder the potential influence of dairy consumption on political inclinations.
Figure 1 illustrates this compelling correlation, depicting a scatterplot that unmistakably portrays a strong and positive relationship between household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska. The data points align with remarkable coherence, akin to the harmonious blending of milk and cookies.
These results may expand the scope of traditional political analyses, introducing a novel dimension to the dairy-laden landscape of electoral dynamics. As the classic image of milk being associated with strong bones subtly transforms into an association with strong electoral support for a specific political party, our findings beckon further exploration and scrutiny.
This unexpected correlation may inspire a whimsical reinterpretation of political campaigns, with politicians vying for the coveted "dairy vote" and perhaps even altering their slogans to reflect the newfound significance of milk in the political arena. The implications of our research may extend beyond the statistical realm, sparking lively discussions, and evoking a resounding chorus of "Moo-ve over, we've got the dairy vote!"
Overall, our findings serve as a source of both amusement and contemplation, paving the way for future investigations into the curiously captivating world of "moo-litical milk money."
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The robust correlation coefficient and statistically significant association uncovered in our analysis provide compelling evidence of a connection between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska. These findings not only corroborate the unexpected nature of this correlation, as hinted at in the literature review, but also offer a novel perspective on the intersection of dietary habits and political preferences.
Our results align with previous research highlighting the multifaceted nature of milk's influence. While Smith et al. (2010) emphasized the health benefits of fresh milk consumption, our study extends this focus to encompass its potential political implications. Likewise, the discourse surrounding "Milk and Money: The Intersection of Dairy Economics and Political Power" (Lorem, 2018) gains new relevance as our findings suggest a tangible link between dairy spending and political support. Indeed, the dairy industry's influence, as hinted at in previous literary works, appears to extend beyond mere economic power into the realm of electoral dynamics.
Moreover, the literature review's nod to fictional narratives and children's shows takes on new significance, as our findings prompt a reevaluation of the seemingly innocuous depictions of milk in popular culture. Could these portrayals serve as subtle indicators of a deeper, underlying relationship between dairy and political inclinations? Our results raise the tantalizing possibility that these lighthearted narratives may harbor a kernel of truth, adding a layer of complexity to the seemingly straightforward act of purchasing dairy products.
In light of these findings, the potential for "moo-litical" undercurrents shaping electoral choices gains empirical support. While the implications of our research may initially evoke chuckles and playful puns, it is essential to recognize the broader significance of this unexpected correlation. As our results prompt a reimagining of political campaigns and slogans to accommodate the newfound significance of milk in the political arena, they underscore the far-reaching implications of seemingly mundane consumer choices on political outcomes.
The implications of our findings extend beyond the statistical realm, raising questions that captivate the imagination and spark intriguing avenues for future research. As the unexpected interplay between milk and political preferences unfolds, it beckons us to ponder the unforeseen ways in which dietary habits intersect with electoral dynamics. Thus, while the exuberance of the dairy-democratic connection may elicit humor, it also underscores the intricate intertwining of seemingly disparate spheres and invites a deeper exploration of their underlying mechanisms.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Nebraska. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Moo-litical Milk Money: The Magnificent Marriage of Milk and Democratic Votes in Nebraska
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examined the potential relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team conducted a thorough assessment of this intriguing connection. Our findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8598945 and a p-value of less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2020, suggesting a statistically significant association. While the classic image of milk being associated with strong bones, could it also be linked to strong electoral support for a particular political party? This unexpected correlation may leave politicians uttering "moo-ve over, we've got the dairy vote!" We present these compelling results as a source of both amusement and potential investigation for future research.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of politics and dairy consumption is a topic that has been largely overlooked in academic circles. While the traditional association of milk with growth and health has been extensively studied, its potential connection to political preferences has, until now, remained unexplored. In particular, the state of Nebraska has provided an intriguing arena for investigation, with its rich agricultural heritage and pivotal role in the American political landscape.
The dairy industry holds significant sway in the American heartland, known for its production of milk, the primary ingredient in the creation of many a delicious dairy product. Over the years, milk has become not only a staple of the American diet but also a symbol of wholesomeness, eliciting nostalgic imagery of milk mustaches and frothy milkshakes. However, could it also be silently influencing the democratic decisions of the electorate?
The purpose of this study was to shed light on the potential relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska. Our aim was to utilize empirical data and robust statistical analysis to determine if there is a discernible correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. Through the systematic examination of economic and electoral data, we sought to unravel the enigmatic tale of "moo-litical milk money" and the captivating connection it may hold with political allegiance.
As we venture into this uncharted territory of udderly unexpected correlations, we invite readers to join us on this scholarly and, dare I say, milk-curdling journey. The implications of our findings may extend beyond the realms of statistical analysis, providing fodder for lively debates and perhaps even inspiring a few dairy-related puns along the way.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska revealed a striking correlation. Over the time period from 2000 to 2020, our analysis uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8598945, with an r-squared value of 0.7394186 and a p-value of less than 0.05. This suggests a statistically significant association between the two variables, prompting us to ponder the potential influence of dairy consumption on political inclinations.
Figure 1 illustrates this compelling correlation, depicting a scatterplot that unmistakably portrays a strong and positive relationship between household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska. The data points align with remarkable coherence, akin to the harmonious blending of milk and cookies.
These results may expand the scope of traditional political analyses, introducing a novel dimension to the dairy-laden landscape of electoral dynamics. As the classic image of milk being associated with strong bones subtly transforms into an association with strong electoral support for a specific political party, our findings beckon further exploration and scrutiny.
This unexpected correlation may inspire a whimsical reinterpretation of political campaigns, with politicians vying for the coveted "dairy vote" and perhaps even altering their slogans to reflect the newfound significance of milk in the political arena. The implications of our research may extend beyond the statistical realm, sparking lively discussions, and evoking a resounding chorus of "Moo-ve over, we've got the dairy vote!"
Overall, our findings serve as a source of both amusement and contemplation, paving the way for future investigations into the curiously captivating world of "moo-litical milk money."
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our study has uncovered a compelling correlation between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska. The statistically significant association we have identified challenges conventional political analyses and introduces an unexpected dimension to the electoral landscape.
This correlation has the potential to redefine the dynamics of political campaigns, as candidates may now find themselves in pursuit of the elusive "dairy vote." The bucolic imagery of verdant pastures and contented cows may thus take on an entirely new political significance. It appears that the saying "got milk" may well extend beyond a mere inquiry about dairy consumption and into the realm of political strategy.
While our findings present a novel perspective on the relationship between dairy products and political preferences, it is important to note that correlation does not imply causation. Nevertheless, the implications of our research extend beyond the realm of statistical analysis, offering fodder for thought-provoking discussions and, perhaps, a dairy-themed spin on future political campaigns.
Ladies and gentlemen, the dairy vote may just be the cream of the crop when it comes to electoral success in Nebraska. However, given the unexpected nature of our findings, it is crucial that further research delves into the mystifying world of "moo-litical milk money." Who knew that a simple glass of milk could hold such political sway?
In light of these momentous findings, we stand by our assertion that no further research is required in this area. The field of udderly unexpected correlations has been thoroughly plowed, and it is time to milk this research for all it's worth.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Moo-litical Milk Money: The Magnificent Marriage of Milk and Democratic Votes in Nebraska. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Bovine Behavioral Journal
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Moo-litical Milk Money: The Magnificent Marriage of Milk and Democratic Votes in Nebraska. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Center for Udderly Democratic Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Moo-litical Milk Money: The Magnificent Marriage of Milk and Democratic Votes in Nebraska with an abstract of This study examined the potential relationship between annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream and votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team conducted a thorough assessment of this intriguing connection. Our findings revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8598945 and a p-value of less than 0.05 for the years 2000 to 2020, suggesting a statistically significant association. While the classic image of milk being associated with strong bones, could it also be linked to strong electoral support for a particular political party? This unexpected correlation may leave politicians uttering "moo-ve over, we've got the dairy vote!" We present these compelling results as a source of both amusement and potential investigation for future research.
ChatGPT:
US household spending on fresh milk, cream, Democratic Presidential candidate votes Nebraska, relationship between milk consumption and political votes, correlation between milk spending and political party support, Bureau of Labor Statistics milk spending data, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, milk consumption and Democratic votes, correlation coefficient milk spending and votes, dairy industry influence on political support
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Annual US household spending on fresh milk and creamDetailed data title: Average annual household spend on fresh milk and cream
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
See what else correlates with Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Nebraska
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.7394186 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 73.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream) over the 6 years from 2000 through 2020.
p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0281. 0.0280692077327118240000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 2.81% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 36 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.16, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2000 | 2004 | 2008 | 2012 | 2016 | 2020 | |
Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream (Household spend) | 131 | 144 | 168 | 152 | 139 | 147 |
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska (Percentage of votes) | 33.253 | 32.6822 | 41.5983 | 38.0273 | 33.6988 | 39.1666 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([131,144,168,152,139,147,])
array_2 = np.array([33.253,32.6822,41.5983,38.0273,33.6988,39.1666,])
array_1_name = "Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream
- Line chart for only Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Nebraska
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Moo-litical Milk Money: The Magnificent Marriage of Milk and Democratic Votes in Nebraska
Hats off to you for rating!
Correlation ID: 5339 · Black Variable ID: 19895 · Red Variable ID: 26129