Download png, svg
AI explanation
It turns out, all the potential robbers in Maryland were just big fans of Extra History, and when they realized the show was running out of content due to the decreased robbery activity, they had less to comment on. Or maybe the robbers were the ones holding the record for most comments on the videos, and without their active engagement, the average number of comments dropped. Who knew thieves had such a passionate interest in historical animated content?Model: dalle-3
Prompt: The prompt could be improved by adding more visual details to enhance the scene. Try this: [ Realistic ] In Maryland, a group of would-be robbers are gathered in a dimly lit room, huddled around a computer with a tangle of wires and empty fast-food containers on the desk. They are avidly watching Extra History YouTube videos, their faces illuminated by the glow of the screen. Their expressions are a mix of fascination and excitement as they passionately comment on the videos. As their interest in historical animated content grows, the average number of comments on the videos steadily increases. However, as they decide to put down their criminal plans and focus all their attention on the show, they find themselves too enthralled to continue their previous activities. This unexpected turn of events leads to a noticeable decrease in robbery activities across the state, and the once messy room is now tidied up, with a change in the average number of comments on Extra History videos. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Robberies in Maryland and Average number of comments on Extra History YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cubism Low poly Oragami Oragami Realistic
ChatGPT: Realistic
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Robberies in Maryland and Average number of comments on Extra History YouTube videos, in the following situation: It turns out, all the potential robbers in Maryland were just big fans of Extra History, and when they realized the show was running out of content due to the decreased robbery activity, they had less to comment on. Or maybe the robbers were the ones holding the record for most comments on the videos, and without their active engagement, the average number of comments dropped. Who knew thieves had such a passionate interest in historical animated content?. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Maryland, a group of would-be robbers are huddled around a computer, avidly watching Extra History YouTube videos and passionately commenting on them. As their interest in historical animated content grows, the average number of comments on the videos steadily increases. However, when they decide to put down their criminal plans and focus all their attention on the show, they find themselves too enthralled to continue their previous activities. This unexpected turn of events leads to a decrease in robbery activities across the state, causing a noticeable drop in the average number of comments on Extra History videos.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In Maryland, a group of would-be robbers are huddled around a computer, avidly watching Extra History YouTube videos and passionately commenting on them. As their interest in historical animated content grows, the average number of comments on the videos steadily increases. However, when they decide to put down their criminal plans and focus all their attention on the show, they find themselves too enthralled to continue their previous activities. This unexpected turn of events leads to a decrease in robbery activities across the state, causing a noticeable drop in the average number of comments on Extra History videos. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: The prompt could be improved by adding more visual details to enhance the scene. Try this: [ Realistic ] In Maryland, a group of would-be robbers are gathered in a dimly lit room, huddled around a computer with a tangle of wires and empty fast-food containers on the desk. They are avidly watching Extra History YouTube videos, their faces illuminated by the glow of the screen. Their expressions are a mix of fascination and excitement as they passionately comment on the videos. As their interest in historical animated content grows, the average number of comments on the videos steadily increases. However, as they decide to put down their criminal plans and focus all their attention on the show, they find themselves too enthralled to continue their previous activities. This unexpected turn of events leads to a noticeable decrease in robbery activities across the state, and the once messy room is now tidied up, with a change in the average number of comments on Extra History videos.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Robberies in Maryland caused Average number of comments on Extra History YouTube videos to decrease.
AI academic paper
An Unlikely Connection: Examining the Correlation between Robberies in Maryland and Comments on Extra History YouTube Videos The Journal of Quirky Socio-Cultural Analysis Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Robberies in Maryland and Average number of comments on Extra History YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.
Your research team used data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9177987 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"An Unlikely Connection: Examining the Correlation between Robberies in Maryland and Comments on Extra History YouTube Videos"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In recent years, the scholarly community has been increasingly intrigued by the potential interplay between seemingly disparate phenomena. This study seeks to contribute to this emerging area of inquiry by investigating the unexpected relationship between the incidence of robberies in the state of Maryland and the number of comments on the popular YouTube series, Extra History. By utilizing comprehensive data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and YouTube, a robust statistical analysis was conducted. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9177987 between these two seemingly unrelated variables over the period from 2012 to 2022, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This unexpected correlation not only prompts further investigation but also serves as a reminder that in the complex web of societal dynamics, even the most unconventional factors may hold unsuspected influence. With this study, we aim to emphasize the importance of approaching research with an open mind and readiness to uncover meaningful connections, no matter how whimsical or unconventional they may initially appear.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Robberies in Maryland and Average number of comments on Extra History YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"An Unlikely Connection: Examining the Correlation between Robberies in Maryland and Comments on Extra History YouTube Videos"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In recent years, the scholarly community has been increasingly intrigued by the potential interplay between seemingly disparate phenomena. This study seeks to contribute to this emerging area of inquiry by investigating the unexpected relationship between the incidence of robberies in the state of Maryland and the number of comments on the popular YouTube series, Extra History. By utilizing comprehensive data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and YouTube, a robust statistical analysis was conducted. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9177987 between these two seemingly unrelated variables over the period from 2012 to 2022, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This unexpected correlation not only prompts further investigation but also serves as a reminder that in the complex web of societal dynamics, even the most unconventional factors may hold unsuspected influence. With this study, we aim to emphasize the importance of approaching research with an open mind and readiness to uncover meaningful connections, no matter how whimsical or unconventional they may initially appear.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down unforeseen paths, where unlikely connections and serendipitous discoveries await. In this vein, our investigation delves into the unexpected association between the occurrence of robberies in Maryland and the volume of comments on Extra History YouTube videos. While at first glance, these two domains may appear as mismatched as mismatched socks, the comprehensive analysis conducted in this study offers compelling evidence of a noteworthy correlation.
As academics, we are no strangers to engaging in multifaceted inquiries, but the convergence of criminal activities and online discourse certainly adds a dash of intrigue to our scholarly pursuits. The conventional wisdom may raise an eyebrow at the coupling of crime statistics and digital engagement, yet our findings paint a compelling portrait of the unexpected interplay between these apparently incongruous phenomena.
The presentation of our findings serves not only to unravel this peculiar connection but also to offer a gentle nudge to the underlying assumption that academic inquiry must adhere to the humdrum of conventionality. As we embark on this exploration of correlations and juxtapositions, let us acknowledge that the academia, much like life itself, can often surprise us with its whimsical winks and unexpected twists.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Robberies in Maryland and Average number of comments on Extra History YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"An Unlikely Connection: Examining the Correlation between Robberies in Maryland and Comments on Extra History YouTube Videos"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In recent years, the scholarly community has been increasingly intrigued by the potential interplay between seemingly disparate phenomena. This study seeks to contribute to this emerging area of inquiry by investigating the unexpected relationship between the incidence of robberies in the state of Maryland and the number of comments on the popular YouTube series, Extra History. By utilizing comprehensive data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and YouTube, a robust statistical analysis was conducted. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9177987 between these two seemingly unrelated variables over the period from 2012 to 2022, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This unexpected correlation not only prompts further investigation but also serves as a reminder that in the complex web of societal dynamics, even the most unconventional factors may hold unsuspected influence. With this study, we aim to emphasize the importance of approaching research with an open mind and readiness to uncover meaningful connections, no matter how whimsical or unconventional they may initially appear.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down unforeseen paths, where unlikely connections and serendipitous discoveries await. In this vein, our investigation delves into the unexpected association between the occurrence of robberies in Maryland and the volume of comments on Extra History YouTube videos. While at first glance, these two domains may appear as mismatched as mismatched socks, the comprehensive analysis conducted in this study offers compelling evidence of a noteworthy correlation.
As academics, we are no strangers to engaging in multifaceted inquiries, but the convergence of criminal activities and online discourse certainly adds a dash of intrigue to our scholarly pursuits. The conventional wisdom may raise an eyebrow at the coupling of crime statistics and digital engagement, yet our findings paint a compelling portrait of the unexpected interplay between these apparently incongruous phenomena.
The presentation of our findings serves not only to unravel this peculiar connection but also to offer a gentle nudge to the underlying assumption that academic inquiry must adhere to the humdrum of conventionality. As we embark on this exploration of correlations and juxtapositions, let us acknowledge that the academia, much like life itself, can often surprise us with its whimsical winks and unexpected twists.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the pursuit of uncovering the unexpected and exploring the unconventional, our investigation into the correlation between robberies in Maryland and comments on Extra History YouTube videos is not without precedent. Prior studies have delved into surprising connections, challenging preconceived notions about seemingly unrelated phenomena. Smith et al. (2016) conducted a groundbreaking analysis on the correlation between ice cream sales and shark attacks, demonstrating the unforeseen relationship between these two disparate variables. However, our study sets out to explore an even more unlikely pairing, demonstrating that the academic pursuit of knowledge is as full of surprises as a jack-in-the-box convention.
Doe's seminal work on "The Influence of Cardboard on Volcano Eruptions" (2018) introduced the notion that certain unexpected factors can have a significant impact on seemingly unrelated events, which has paved the way for our current investigation. Jones's research on "The Relationship between the Number of Cows in a Field and UFO Sightings" (2019) further expanded the scope of unconventional inquiries, setting the stage for our own inquiry into the realm of unexpected associations.
Turning our attention to the non-fiction literature that may shed light on the equally unexpected connection between robberies and YouTube comments, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offers insights into unconventional correlations, inviting us to contemplate the potential for unanticipated relationships within complex societal dynamics. In a similar vein, "The Tipping Point" by Malcolm Gladwell urges us to rethink the conventional boundaries of cause and effect, prompting us to consider the possibility of unexpected influences that may go unnoticed in everyday analysis.
Further expanding the horizon of our exploration into the improbable, works of fiction such as "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown and "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams offer literary parallels that beckon us to unravel mysteries and unexpected connections. Within the realm of cinema, a tangential exploration of unlikely associations can be found in "Ocean's Eleven," where the intricate dynamics of heist planning and unexpected friendships echo the whimsical unpredictability inherent in our study's correlation.
In our pursuit of understanding the world around us, we must remain open to the unexpected, prepared to embrace the unanticipated connections that may surface. Our investigation into the correlation between robberies in Maryland and comments on Extra History YouTube videos serves as a testament to the serendipitous nature of scholarly inquiry, reminding us that even the most unexpected pairings may hold valuable insights, much like finding a surprise toy at the bottom of a cereal box.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Robberies in Maryland and Average number of comments on Extra History YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and YouTube . You used data from 2012 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"An Unlikely Connection: Examining the Correlation between Robberies in Maryland and Comments on Extra History YouTube Videos"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In recent years, the scholarly community has been increasingly intrigued by the potential interplay between seemingly disparate phenomena. This study seeks to contribute to this emerging area of inquiry by investigating the unexpected relationship between the incidence of robberies in the state of Maryland and the number of comments on the popular YouTube series, Extra History. By utilizing comprehensive data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and YouTube, a robust statistical analysis was conducted. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9177987 between these two seemingly unrelated variables over the period from 2012 to 2022, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This unexpected correlation not only prompts further investigation but also serves as a reminder that in the complex web of societal dynamics, even the most unconventional factors may hold unsuspected influence. With this study, we aim to emphasize the importance of approaching research with an open mind and readiness to uncover meaningful connections, no matter how whimsical or unconventional they may initially appear.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down unforeseen paths, where unlikely connections and serendipitous discoveries await. In this vein, our investigation delves into the unexpected association between the occurrence of robberies in Maryland and the volume of comments on Extra History YouTube videos. While at first glance, these two domains may appear as mismatched as mismatched socks, the comprehensive analysis conducted in this study offers compelling evidence of a noteworthy correlation.
As academics, we are no strangers to engaging in multifaceted inquiries, but the convergence of criminal activities and online discourse certainly adds a dash of intrigue to our scholarly pursuits. The conventional wisdom may raise an eyebrow at the coupling of crime statistics and digital engagement, yet our findings paint a compelling portrait of the unexpected interplay between these apparently incongruous phenomena.
The presentation of our findings serves not only to unravel this peculiar connection but also to offer a gentle nudge to the underlying assumption that academic inquiry must adhere to the humdrum of conventionality. As we embark on this exploration of correlations and juxtapositions, let us acknowledge that the academia, much like life itself, can often surprise us with its whimsical winks and unexpected twists.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Data Collection:
The foundation of this study rested upon the meticulous acquisition and curation of data from a variety of sources. The primary source for the incidence of robberies in the state of Maryland was the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, which provided a comprehensive repository of crime statistics from 2012 to 2022. The voluminous nature of this data compelled us to adopt a systematic approach, which involved sifting through countless records to extract the pertinent information. It was truly an exhilarating treasure hunt, albeit one with an emphasis on felonious escapades.
In parallel, the data concerning the number of comments on Extra History YouTube videos was directly obtained from the platform itself. The nimble fingers of our research team danced across keyboards and screens, diligently recording the ebbs and flows of digital discourse in response to the captivating historical narratives presented in the videos. The vast expanse of user-generated content was a sight to behold, akin to traversing a dense jungle of online commentary, replete with colorful remarks and unforeseen tangents.
Data Analysis:
With our data sets in hand, we proceeded to employ a meticulous analysis to unearth potential correlations. To ensure the robustness of our findings, we subjected the data to a series of statistical tests, applying the rigor of empirical inquiry to uncover any semblance of association between the incidence of robberies and the volume of comments on Extra History YouTube videos. The statistical toolbox at our disposal abounded with an assortment of measures, including the Pearson correlation coefficient and regression analyses, which we employed with the precision of a watchmaker delicately assembling the intricate elements of a timepiece.
Furthermore, to safeguard against spurious inferences and to fortify the reliability of our statistical findings, we endeavored to control for potential confounding variables such as time trends, seasonal variations, and the influence of external events. This meticulous process was akin to navigating a labyrinth, where each twist and turn demanded our unwavering attention and each potential pitfall necessitated caution, lest we stumble into the snare of erroneous conclusions.
Ethical Considerations:
Amidst the fervor of data acquisition and analysis, we remained steadfast in upholding the ethical principles that underpin scholarly inquiry. The privacy and anonymity of individuals involved in both criminal activities and online engagement were rigorously safeguarded, with the data utilized in this study anonymized and aggregated to ensure the utmost respect for the rights and dignity of all individuals involved.
Limitations:
Despite the fervent dedication invested in this study, it is pivotal to acknowledge the inherent limitations that are inherent in any research endeavor. The scope of this study focused exclusively on the state of Maryland, and thus, caution should be exercised in generalizing the findings to broader geographical contexts. Additionally, the correlational nature of our findings precludes causal inferences, reminding us that even amidst the compelling connections uncovered, correlation does not necessarily imply causation, no matter how tempting the narrative may seem.
The confluence of criminal statistics and digital engagement unfolded as a serendipitous conundrum, underscoring the capricious nature of scholarly inquiry. As we delve into the labyrinthine world of academia's methodologies, may the pursuit of knowledge continue to surprise and entertain us with its unpredictable twists and moments of delightful revelation.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Robberies in Maryland and Average number of comments on Extra History YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and YouTube .
For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9177987, r-squared of 0.8423545, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"An Unlikely Connection: Examining the Correlation between Robberies in Maryland and Comments on Extra History YouTube Videos"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In recent years, the scholarly community has been increasingly intrigued by the potential interplay between seemingly disparate phenomena. This study seeks to contribute to this emerging area of inquiry by investigating the unexpected relationship between the incidence of robberies in the state of Maryland and the number of comments on the popular YouTube series, Extra History. By utilizing comprehensive data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and YouTube, a robust statistical analysis was conducted. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9177987 between these two seemingly unrelated variables over the period from 2012 to 2022, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This unexpected correlation not only prompts further investigation but also serves as a reminder that in the complex web of societal dynamics, even the most unconventional factors may hold unsuspected influence. With this study, we aim to emphasize the importance of approaching research with an open mind and readiness to uncover meaningful connections, no matter how whimsical or unconventional they may initially appear.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down unforeseen paths, where unlikely connections and serendipitous discoveries await. In this vein, our investigation delves into the unexpected association between the occurrence of robberies in Maryland and the volume of comments on Extra History YouTube videos. While at first glance, these two domains may appear as mismatched as mismatched socks, the comprehensive analysis conducted in this study offers compelling evidence of a noteworthy correlation.
As academics, we are no strangers to engaging in multifaceted inquiries, but the convergence of criminal activities and online discourse certainly adds a dash of intrigue to our scholarly pursuits. The conventional wisdom may raise an eyebrow at the coupling of crime statistics and digital engagement, yet our findings paint a compelling portrait of the unexpected interplay between these apparently incongruous phenomena.
The presentation of our findings serves not only to unravel this peculiar connection but also to offer a gentle nudge to the underlying assumption that academic inquiry must adhere to the humdrum of conventionality. As we embark on this exploration of correlations and juxtapositions, let us acknowledge that the academia, much like life itself, can often surprise us with its whimsical winks and unexpected twists.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between the incidence of robberies in Maryland and the number of comments on Extra History YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient, calculated to be 0.9177987, indicates a robust positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This strong correlation is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8423545, underscoring the extent to which the variability in one variable can be explained by the other. The statistical significance of this relationship is highlighted by a p-value of less than 0.01, reinforcing the validity of our findings.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot illustrates the clear and compelling relationship between the occurrence of robberies and the volume of comments on Extra History YouTube videos, further emphasizing the unexpected connection uncovered in our analysis.
The findings of this study challenge conventional expectations and underscore the complexity of societal dynamics. The unexpected correlation between these two seemingly unrelated variables prompts further inquiry into the mechanisms underlying this relationship. Our results not only contribute to the burgeoning discourse on interdisciplinary connections but also serve as a lively reminder that the realm of scholarly inquiry is rife with opportunities for unexpected discoveries and unconventional associations.
It is our hope that this study will encourage fellow researchers to approach their inquiries with open-mindedness and a willingness to explore connections that may at first glance appear whimsical or improbable. As we continue to navigate the uncharted territories of knowledge, let us not forget the potential for serendipitous connections and surprising correlations to enrich the tapestry of academic inquiry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Robberies in Maryland and Average number of comments on Extra History YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"An Unlikely Connection: Examining the Correlation between Robberies in Maryland and Comments on Extra History YouTube Videos"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In recent years, the scholarly community has been increasingly intrigued by the potential interplay between seemingly disparate phenomena. This study seeks to contribute to this emerging area of inquiry by investigating the unexpected relationship between the incidence of robberies in the state of Maryland and the number of comments on the popular YouTube series, Extra History. By utilizing comprehensive data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and YouTube, a robust statistical analysis was conducted. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9177987 between these two seemingly unrelated variables over the period from 2012 to 2022, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This unexpected correlation not only prompts further investigation but also serves as a reminder that in the complex web of societal dynamics, even the most unconventional factors may hold unsuspected influence. With this study, we aim to emphasize the importance of approaching research with an open mind and readiness to uncover meaningful connections, no matter how whimsical or unconventional they may initially appear.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the pursuit of uncovering the unexpected and exploring the unconventional, our investigation into the correlation between robberies in Maryland and comments on Extra History YouTube videos is not without precedent. Prior studies have delved into surprising connections, challenging preconceived notions about seemingly unrelated phenomena. Smith et al. (2016) conducted a groundbreaking analysis on the correlation between ice cream sales and shark attacks, demonstrating the unforeseen relationship between these two disparate variables. However, our study sets out to explore an even more unlikely pairing, demonstrating that the academic pursuit of knowledge is as full of surprises as a jack-in-the-box convention.
Doe's seminal work on "The Influence of Cardboard on Volcano Eruptions" (2018) introduced the notion that certain unexpected factors can have a significant impact on seemingly unrelated events, which has paved the way for our current investigation. Jones's research on "The Relationship between the Number of Cows in a Field and UFO Sightings" (2019) further expanded the scope of unconventional inquiries, setting the stage for our own inquiry into the realm of unexpected associations.
Turning our attention to the non-fiction literature that may shed light on the equally unexpected connection between robberies and YouTube comments, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offers insights into unconventional correlations, inviting us to contemplate the potential for unanticipated relationships within complex societal dynamics. In a similar vein, "The Tipping Point" by Malcolm Gladwell urges us to rethink the conventional boundaries of cause and effect, prompting us to consider the possibility of unexpected influences that may go unnoticed in everyday analysis.
Further expanding the horizon of our exploration into the improbable, works of fiction such as "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown and "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams offer literary parallels that beckon us to unravel mysteries and unexpected connections. Within the realm of cinema, a tangential exploration of unlikely associations can be found in "Ocean's Eleven," where the intricate dynamics of heist planning and unexpected friendships echo the whimsical unpredictability inherent in our study's correlation.
In our pursuit of understanding the world around us, we must remain open to the unexpected, prepared to embrace the unanticipated connections that may surface. Our investigation into the correlation between robberies in Maryland and comments on Extra History YouTube videos serves as a testament to the serendipitous nature of scholarly inquiry, reminding us that even the most unexpected pairings may hold valuable insights, much like finding a surprise toy at the bottom of a cereal box.
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between the incidence of robberies in Maryland and the number of comments on Extra History YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient, calculated to be 0.9177987, indicates a robust positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This strong correlation is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8423545, underscoring the extent to which the variability in one variable can be explained by the other. The statistical significance of this relationship is highlighted by a p-value of less than 0.01, reinforcing the validity of our findings.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot illustrates the clear and compelling relationship between the occurrence of robberies and the volume of comments on Extra History YouTube videos, further emphasizing the unexpected connection uncovered in our analysis.
The findings of this study challenge conventional expectations and underscore the complexity of societal dynamics. The unexpected correlation between these two seemingly unrelated variables prompts further inquiry into the mechanisms underlying this relationship. Our results not only contribute to the burgeoning discourse on interdisciplinary connections but also serve as a lively reminder that the realm of scholarly inquiry is rife with opportunities for unexpected discoveries and unconventional associations.
It is our hope that this study will encourage fellow researchers to approach their inquiries with open-mindedness and a willingness to explore connections that may at first glance appear whimsical or improbable. As we continue to navigate the uncharted territories of knowledge, let us not forget the potential for serendipitous connections and surprising correlations to enrich the tapestry of academic inquiry.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The findings of this investigation into the correlation between robberies in Maryland and comments on Extra History YouTube videos have unearthed a connection that, while unconventional, demands serious consideration. Our study aligns with previous research that has delved into unexpected associations, such as the correlation between ice cream sales and shark attacks, shedding light on the unpredictable nature of societal phenomena. While the link between robberies and YouTube engagement may initially seem as incongruous as a penguin at the North Pole, the statistical evidence obtained aligns with our theoretical framework, reaffirming that the study's associations are not as far-fetched as finding Bigfoot's footprints in a bakery. The robust positive relationship observed between these variables reinforces the need to approach research with a willingness to explore correlations that may appear whimsical or unconventional, akin to receiving a prize in a box of Cracker Jack.
Our findings echo the sentiment put forth by Smith et al. (2016) and the work of Doe (2018) and Jones (2019), who all champion the pursuit of understanding through unorthodox means. This unlikely correlation draws attention to the multifaceted nature of societal dynamics, challenging us to acknowledge that the tapestry of human behavior is as intricate and unpredictable as the plot twists in an M. Night Shyamalan film. The unexpected connections uncovered through this study prompt us to reevaluate the potential for unanticipated relationships within complex systems, emphasizing that the most unexpected pairings may hold valuable insights, much like discovering a hidden chamber behind a bookshelf in an old library.
It is clear that our results align with the spirit of unconventional exploration championed by Levitt and Dubner in "Freakonomics" and Gladwell's "The Tipping Point," as well as the literary parallels drawn from works of fiction. Like decoding ancient clues in "The Da Vinci Code," our investigation sparks the curiosity to unearth hidden influences, urging researchers to embrace the prospect of serendipitous connections and surprising correlations that can enrich the realm of scholarly inquiry, much like finding a rare comic book at a garage sale.
We hope that this study not only contributes to the discourse on interdisciplinary connections but also encourages fellow researchers to remain open to the unexpected, prepared to embrace the unforeseen connections that have the potential to transform our understanding of societal dynamics. The unanticipated correlation uncovered in this study serves as a reminder that the pursuit of knowledge is replete with opportunities for unexpected discoveries and unconventional associations, much like encountering a unicorn in a game of "Where's Waldo?"
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Robberies in Maryland and Average number of comments on Extra History YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"An Unlikely Connection: Examining the Correlation between Robberies in Maryland and Comments on Extra History YouTube Videos"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In recent years, the scholarly community has been increasingly intrigued by the potential interplay between seemingly disparate phenomena. This study seeks to contribute to this emerging area of inquiry by investigating the unexpected relationship between the incidence of robberies in the state of Maryland and the number of comments on the popular YouTube series, Extra History. By utilizing comprehensive data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and YouTube, a robust statistical analysis was conducted. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9177987 between these two seemingly unrelated variables over the period from 2012 to 2022, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This unexpected correlation not only prompts further investigation but also serves as a reminder that in the complex web of societal dynamics, even the most unconventional factors may hold unsuspected influence. With this study, we aim to emphasize the importance of approaching research with an open mind and readiness to uncover meaningful connections, no matter how whimsical or unconventional they may initially appear.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down unforeseen paths, where unlikely connections and serendipitous discoveries await. In this vein, our investigation delves into the unexpected association between the occurrence of robberies in Maryland and the volume of comments on Extra History YouTube videos. While at first glance, these two domains may appear as mismatched as mismatched socks, the comprehensive analysis conducted in this study offers compelling evidence of a noteworthy correlation.
As academics, we are no strangers to engaging in multifaceted inquiries, but the convergence of criminal activities and online discourse certainly adds a dash of intrigue to our scholarly pursuits. The conventional wisdom may raise an eyebrow at the coupling of crime statistics and digital engagement, yet our findings paint a compelling portrait of the unexpected interplay between these apparently incongruous phenomena.
The presentation of our findings serves not only to unravel this peculiar connection but also to offer a gentle nudge to the underlying assumption that academic inquiry must adhere to the humdrum of conventionality. As we embark on this exploration of correlations and juxtapositions, let us acknowledge that the academia, much like life itself, can often surprise us with its whimsical winks and unexpected twists.
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between the incidence of robberies in Maryland and the number of comments on Extra History YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient, calculated to be 0.9177987, indicates a robust positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This strong correlation is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8423545, underscoring the extent to which the variability in one variable can be explained by the other. The statistical significance of this relationship is highlighted by a p-value of less than 0.01, reinforcing the validity of our findings.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot illustrates the clear and compelling relationship between the occurrence of robberies and the volume of comments on Extra History YouTube videos, further emphasizing the unexpected connection uncovered in our analysis.
The findings of this study challenge conventional expectations and underscore the complexity of societal dynamics. The unexpected correlation between these two seemingly unrelated variables prompts further inquiry into the mechanisms underlying this relationship. Our results not only contribute to the burgeoning discourse on interdisciplinary connections but also serve as a lively reminder that the realm of scholarly inquiry is rife with opportunities for unexpected discoveries and unconventional associations.
It is our hope that this study will encourage fellow researchers to approach their inquiries with open-mindedness and a willingness to explore connections that may at first glance appear whimsical or improbable. As we continue to navigate the uncharted territories of knowledge, let us not forget the potential for serendipitous connections and surprising correlations to enrich the tapestry of academic inquiry.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our study has illustrated a substantial and robust correlation between the occurrence of robberies in Maryland and the volume of comments on Extra History YouTube videos. This unexpected statistical relationship, while raising eyebrows and prompting quizzical looks, underscores the serendipitous nature of academic inquiry.
While the findings of our investigation may seem as unexpected as a sudden plot twist in a telenovela, they emphasize the need for researchers to maintain a keen awareness of the potential for whimsical and improbable correlations within the complex fabric of societal dynamics.
It is clear that further exploration of the mechanisms underlying this unlikely connection is warranted; however, for now, we are content to leave our audience with this eyebrow-raising correlation as a pleasant intellectual puzzle to ponder. Perhaps, as we embrace the unexpected and the offbeat, the elusive threads of causation weaving through seemingly unrelated phenomena will reveal themselves.
We conclude that our study stands as a testament to the potential for scholarly inquiry to uncover remarkable and unusual associations, ones that add a sense of whimsy to the often staid world of academic research. In the spirit of unpredictable discoveries and scholarly caprice, we dare say that no further research is needed in this most unusual of connections. We leave it to the academic universe to savor the whimsically unexpected nature of this correlation.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited An Unlikely Connection: Examining the Correlation between Robberies in Maryland and Comments on Extra History YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Quirky Socio-Cultural Analysis
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited An Unlikely Connection: Examining the Correlation between Robberies in Maryland and Comments on Extra History YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Quirky Connections in Social Sciences
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled An Unlikely Connection: Examining the Correlation between Robberies in Maryland and Comments on Extra History YouTube Videos with an abstract of In recent years, the scholarly community has been increasingly intrigued by the potential interplay between seemingly disparate phenomena. This study seeks to contribute to this emerging area of inquiry by investigating the unexpected relationship between the incidence of robberies in the state of Maryland and the number of comments on the popular YouTube series, Extra History. By utilizing comprehensive data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and YouTube, a robust statistical analysis was conducted. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9177987 between these two seemingly unrelated variables over the period from 2012 to 2022, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This unexpected correlation not only prompts further investigation but also serves as a reminder that in the complex web of societal dynamics, even the most unconventional factors may hold unsuspected influence. With this study, we aim to emphasize the importance of approaching research with an open mind and readiness to uncover meaningful connections, no matter how whimsical or unconventional they may initially appear.
ChatGPT:
robberies, Maryland, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, YouTube, Extra History, correlation, statistical analysis, surprising connections, societal dynamics, unconventional factors
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Robberies in MarylandDetailed data title: The robbery rate per 100,000 residents in Maryland
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Robberies in Maryland
Average number of comments on Extra History YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Average number of comments on Extra History YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Average number of comments on Extra History YouTube videos
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8423545 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Average number of comments on Extra History YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Robberies in Maryland) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.8E-5. 0.0000679911862562311300000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 0.0068% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 14,708 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.71, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
Robberies in Maryland (Robbery rate) | 172.9 | 169.2 | 160.1 | 168.7 | 179.5 | 185.7 | 161 | 152.2 | 118.5 | 120.3 | 114.2 |
Average number of comments on Extra History YouTube videos (Average Comments) | 1186.47 | 1344.09 | 1047.52 | 1201.57 | 1380.7 | 1512.42 | 1329.95 | 880.141 | 840.944 | 710.349 | 364.593 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([172.9,169.2,160.1,168.7,179.5,185.7,161,152.2,118.5,120.3,114.2,])
array_2 = np.array([1186.47,1344.09,1047.52,1201.57,1380.7,1512.42,1329.95,880.141,840.944,710.349,364.593,])
array_1_name = "Robberies in Maryland"
array_2_name = "Average number of comments on Extra History YouTube videos"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Robberies in Maryland
- Line chart for only Average number of comments on Extra History YouTube videos
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: An Unlikely Connection: Examining the Correlation between Robberies in Maryland and Comments on Extra History YouTube Videos
I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!
Correlation ID: 5337 · Black Variable ID: 20194 · Red Variable ID: 25777