about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,313 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Cottage cheese consumption and the second variable is Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Arkansas.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Arkansas was unable to curdle up enough democratic support without their usual cheesy candidate. As cottage cheese consumption curdled, so did the democratic votes in Arkansas. When the curds were down, so were the ballots for the democrat presidential candidate.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create a hyper-realistic image of a cozy kitchen in Arkansas with a family gathered around a wooden dining table. The sunlight gently filters in through the window, casting warm, inviting tones over the scene. The table is set with a simple, homely spread, and the family members are seen spooning cottage cheese onto their plates. The creamy texture of the cottage cheese is richly detailed and inviting, capturing the viewers' attention. In the background, a television is visible, displaying the election results with a map highlighting Arkansas. The votes for the Democratic presidential candidate are shown curdling down with the cottage cheese on the table, casting a surreal yet thought-provoking visual juxtaposition. The scene is brimming with warmth and character, evoking a sense of familial warmth and the political zeitgeist of the moment. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Cottage cheese consumption and Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Arkansas. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyberpunk Steampunk Cyberpunk Hyper-realistic Parallax art
ChatGPT: Hyper-realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Cottage cheese consumption and Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Arkansas, in the following situation: Arkansas was unable to curdle up enough democratic support without their usual cheesy candidate. As cottage cheese consumption curdled, so did the democratic votes in Arkansas. When the curds were down, so were the ballots for the democrat presidential candidate.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy kitchen in Arkansas, a family sits down to a meal of cottage cheese. As they spoon the creamy cheese onto their plates, they chat about the upcoming election. Meanwhile, in the background, a television shows the election results with a map highlighting Arkansas and the votes for the Democratic presidential candidate curdling down with the cottage cheese on the table.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Hyper-realistic ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy kitchen in Arkansas, a family sits down to a meal of cottage cheese. As they spoon the creamy cheese onto their plates, they chat about the upcoming election. Meanwhile, in the background, a television shows the election results with a map highlighting Arkansas and the votes for the Democratic presidential candidate curdling down with the cottage cheese on the table. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create a hyper-realistic image of a cozy kitchen in Arkansas with a family gathered around a wooden dining table. The sunlight gently filters in through the window, casting warm, inviting tones over the scene. The table is set with a simple, homely spread, and the family members are seen spooning cottage cheese onto their plates. The creamy texture of the cottage cheese is richly detailed and inviting, capturing the viewers' attention. In the background, a television is visible, displaying the election results with a map highlighting Arkansas. The votes for the Democratic presidential candidate are shown curdling down with the cottage cheese on the table, casting a surreal yet thought-provoking visual juxtaposition. The scene is brimming with warmth and character, evoking a sense of familial warmth and the political zeitgeist of the moment.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Cottage cheese consumption caused Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Arkansas to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Curds and Democrats: An Examination of Cottage Cheese Consumption and Voting Patterns in Arkansas

The Journal of Dairy Democracy

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cottage cheese consumption and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Arkansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8216258 and p < 0.05 for 1990 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Curds and Democrats: An Examination of Cottage Cheese Consumption and Voting Patterns in Arkansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between dairy consumption and political preferences by exploring the connection between cottage cheese consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in the state of Arkansas. Leveraging data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, in conjunction with the Harvard Dataverse, we scrutinized voting patterns from 1990 to 2020. Our findings suggest a remarkably strong correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8216258 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05. These results indicate a potential link between the consumption of curdled dairy products and electoral inclinations, paving the whey for further exploration into the intersection of gastronomy and governance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cottage cheese consumption and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Arkansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Curds and Democrats: An Examination of Cottage Cheese Consumption and Voting Patterns in Arkansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between dairy consumption and political preferences by exploring the connection between cottage cheese consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in the state of Arkansas. Leveraging data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, in conjunction with the Harvard Dataverse, we scrutinized voting patterns from 1990 to 2020. Our findings suggest a remarkably strong correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8216258 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05. These results indicate a potential link between the consumption of curdled dairy products and electoral inclinations, paving the whey for further exploration into the intersection of gastronomy and governance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

When it comes to politics, the correlation between dietary habits and voting behavior may not be the first thing that comes to mind. However, as the old adage goes, "you are what you eat," and it seems that your political leanings might also be influenced by what you choose to consume. In this study, we aim to explore the rather unexpected relationship between the consumption of cottage cheese and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in the state of Arkansas. Who would have thought that dairy products could be so politically inclined? We'll certainly explore this topic with great “cheddar” and delve into the “whey” of this intriguing phenomenon.

While research into the intersection of gastronomy and governance may seem unconventional, it is crucial to consider the potential impact of dietary habits on political decision-making. After all, as citizens head to the polls, they bring with them not just their political convictions, but also their dietary proclivities. Whether it’s cheesy puns or straight-laced statistical analysis, there's no denying that this topic is certainly not "brie-lliant" but also a fascinating avenue for exploration.

As we embark on this research journey, we aim to unravel the potential link between cottage cheese consumption and voting patterns with the “grate”est precision. By leveraging data from reputable sources such as the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, in conjunction with the Harvard Dataverse, we seek to bring a “gouda” blend of empirical rigor and statistical analysis to this rather unusual subject matter.

With the political landscape constantly evolving, it is essential to “milk” every possible avenue for understanding voter behavior. The findings of this study may have far-reaching implications, potentially shedding light on the hitherto unexplored influence of dairy products on political preferences. So, grab a spoonful of cottage cheese, or perhaps a slice of cheese for those lactose intolerant, and let's delve into the “wheys” of this intriguing relationship between curds and Democrats in the state of Arkansas.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cottage cheese consumption and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Arkansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Curds and Democrats: An Examination of Cottage Cheese Consumption and Voting Patterns in Arkansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between dairy consumption and political preferences by exploring the connection between cottage cheese consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in the state of Arkansas. Leveraging data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, in conjunction with the Harvard Dataverse, we scrutinized voting patterns from 1990 to 2020. Our findings suggest a remarkably strong correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8216258 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05. These results indicate a potential link between the consumption of curdled dairy products and electoral inclinations, paving the whey for further exploration into the intersection of gastronomy and governance.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
When it comes to politics, the correlation between dietary habits and voting behavior may not be the first thing that comes to mind. However, as the old adage goes, "you are what you eat," and it seems that your political leanings might also be influenced by what you choose to consume. In this study, we aim to explore the rather unexpected relationship between the consumption of cottage cheese and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in the state of Arkansas. Who would have thought that dairy products could be so politically inclined? We'll certainly explore this topic with great “cheddar” and delve into the “whey” of this intriguing phenomenon.
While research into the intersection of gastronomy and governance may seem unconventional, it is crucial to consider the potential impact of dietary habits on political decision-making. After all, as citizens head to the polls, they bring with them not just their political convictions, but also their dietary proclivities. Whether it’s cheesy puns or straight-laced statistical analysis, there's no denying that this topic is certainly not "brie-lliant" but also a fascinating avenue for exploration.
As we embark on this research journey, we aim to unravel the potential link between cottage cheese consumption and voting patterns with the “grate”est precision. By leveraging data from reputable sources such as the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, in conjunction with the Harvard Dataverse, we seek to bring a “gouda” blend of empirical rigor and statistical analysis to this rather unusual subject matter.
With the political landscape constantly evolving, it is essential to “milk” every possible avenue for understanding voter behavior. The findings of this study may have far-reaching implications, potentially shedding light on the hitherto unexplored influence of dairy products on political preferences. So, grab a spoonful of cottage cheese, or perhaps a slice of cheese for those lactose intolerant, and let's delve into the “wheys” of this intriguing relationship between curds and Democrats in the state of Arkansas.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The prevailing literature on the intersection between dairy consumption and political behavior offers a mix of traditional scholarly inquiry and a sprinkle of whimsy that is befitting of such a peculiar topic. Smith et al. (2015) examined the relationship between cheese consumption and civic engagement, finding that individuals who consumed more cheese showed greater participation in political events. While their study did not specifically focus on cottage cheese, it lays a foundation for understanding the potential impact of dairy products on political inclinations.

Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the societal implications of dairy preferences, uncovering a nuanced connection between milk-based products and social affiliations. Their findings hinted at the possibility of dairy choices influencing broader sociopolitical leanings, albeit without explicitly delving into the specific political party preferences associated with cottage cheese consumption.

As we move closer to the crux of our investigation, it is imperative to consider the broader cultural and literary discourse surrounding dairy products and their potential influence on political predilections. In "Milk and the Political Sphere" by A. Dairy (2017), the author explores the historical symbolism of dairy products in political movements, emphasizing the societal significance of milk and cheese throughout the annals of governance. Though not explicitly focused on cottage cheese, the thematic exploration provides an insightful backdrop for our endeavors.

Turning to the fictional realm, "Curds and Conspiracies" by Brie Tanner (2019) offers a whimsical perspective on the clandestine world of dairy intrigue, weaving a tale of political subterfuge involving, unsurprisingly, cottage cheese as a central plot device. While certainly a work of fiction, the novel inadvertently underscores the intrigue and mystery surrounding the potential influence of cottage cheese on political proclivities.

On a lighter note, several children's shows and cartoons have subtly depicted the intersection of dairy products and political preferences. "The Case of the Missing Cottage Cheese" in the animated series "Curd Detectives" and the recurring motif of cottage cheese in "Moo-tropolis: Dairy Dynamics" serve as lighthearted yet surprisingly relevant cultural representations of the potential link between dairy consumption and political leanings. While these may not directly contribute to empirical research, they certainly add an element of levity to our exploration.

With the chorus of scholarly works, literary musings, and cultural representations echoing in the background, we find ourselves standing at the cusp of a rather "cheesy" yet undeniably intriguing confluence of gastronomy and governance. As we plunge into the empirical terrain, it becomes evident that our inquiry into the curious relationship between cottage cheese consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Arkansas is both unprecedented and ripe with potential for unexpected discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cottage cheese consumption and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Arkansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1990 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Curds and Democrats: An Examination of Cottage Cheese Consumption and Voting Patterns in Arkansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between dairy consumption and political preferences by exploring the connection between cottage cheese consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in the state of Arkansas. Leveraging data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, in conjunction with the Harvard Dataverse, we scrutinized voting patterns from 1990 to 2020. Our findings suggest a remarkably strong correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8216258 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05. These results indicate a potential link between the consumption of curdled dairy products and electoral inclinations, paving the whey for further exploration into the intersection of gastronomy and governance.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
When it comes to politics, the correlation between dietary habits and voting behavior may not be the first thing that comes to mind. However, as the old adage goes, "you are what you eat," and it seems that your political leanings might also be influenced by what you choose to consume. In this study, we aim to explore the rather unexpected relationship between the consumption of cottage cheese and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in the state of Arkansas. Who would have thought that dairy products could be so politically inclined? We'll certainly explore this topic with great “cheddar” and delve into the “whey” of this intriguing phenomenon.
While research into the intersection of gastronomy and governance may seem unconventional, it is crucial to consider the potential impact of dietary habits on political decision-making. After all, as citizens head to the polls, they bring with them not just their political convictions, but also their dietary proclivities. Whether it’s cheesy puns or straight-laced statistical analysis, there's no denying that this topic is certainly not "brie-lliant" but also a fascinating avenue for exploration.
As we embark on this research journey, we aim to unravel the potential link between cottage cheese consumption and voting patterns with the “grate”est precision. By leveraging data from reputable sources such as the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, in conjunction with the Harvard Dataverse, we seek to bring a “gouda” blend of empirical rigor and statistical analysis to this rather unusual subject matter.
With the political landscape constantly evolving, it is essential to “milk” every possible avenue for understanding voter behavior. The findings of this study may have far-reaching implications, potentially shedding light on the hitherto unexplored influence of dairy products on political preferences. So, grab a spoonful of cottage cheese, or perhaps a slice of cheese for those lactose intolerant, and let's delve into the “wheys” of this intriguing relationship between curds and Democrats in the state of Arkansas.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
Our research team has meticulously collected data from various sources, with a key emphasis on the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, and the Harvard Dataverse. We aimed for a comprehensive data collection process, embracing the spirit of “grate” scholarship in the pursuit of uncovering the potential relationship between cottage cheese consumption and voting patterns in Arkansas. The data spanned from 1990 to 2020 to ensure a thorough analysis of the electoral dynamics in the state and the concomitant dairy consumption trends.

Cottage Cheese Consumption Measurement:
To determine the levels of cottage cheese consumption, our team delved into the depths of online grocery sales records, market research reports, and even the occasional foray into obscure dairy forums—anything for the pursuit of cheesy enlightenment. The data collection process involved meticulously scouring through consumer purchasing habits, industry reports, and any mention of curdled dairy products, leaving no dairy aisle unturned.

Voting Data Acquisition:
The voting data for the Democrat presidential candidate in Arkansas was obtained from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, ensuring the highest quality and most politically potent dataset for our analysis. These data were cross-referenced with historical election archives, voter registration records, and the occasional exit poll data, providing a comprehensive overview of the ebbs and flows of political preferences in Arkansas.

Statistical Analysis:
In line with the holy “gouda” principles of statistical rigor, our analysis entailed a robust examination of correlation coefficients, regression analyses, and the occasional foray into Bayesian statistics. We used the statistical software suite popular with researchers who are dairy product enthusiasts, examining numerous models to ensure the “grate”est degree of precision in quantifying the association between cottage cheese consumption and voting patterns.

Control Variables:
In order to account for potential confounding variables that could cloud the “whey” to our findings, we included demographic variables, regional economic indicators, and electoral campaign dynamics in our models. This approach allowed us to distill the essence of the relationship between cottage cheese and Democratic voting preferences from the “whey-sted” influences of extraneous factors.

Ethical Considerations:
Throughout the data collection and analysis process, our research adhered to the highest ethical standards, ensuring the privacy and confidentiality of individuals, and the utmost respect for the principles of scientific integrity. The “feta” official guidelines and protocols were strictly followed to ensure the souring of personal data was avoided and that our research was conducted with the utmost respect for privacy and compliance with regulations.

Overall, the methodology employed in this study has strived to blend academic rigor and a “whey” of whimsy, capturing the spirit of inquiry while maintaining the utmost devotion to the principles of scientific inquiry in the pursuit of understanding the apparent connection between cottage cheese and Democrat voting preferences in Arkansas.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cottage cheese consumption and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Arkansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 1990 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8216258, r-squared of 0.6750689, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Curds and Democrats: An Examination of Cottage Cheese Consumption and Voting Patterns in Arkansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between dairy consumption and political preferences by exploring the connection between cottage cheese consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in the state of Arkansas. Leveraging data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, in conjunction with the Harvard Dataverse, we scrutinized voting patterns from 1990 to 2020. Our findings suggest a remarkably strong correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8216258 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05. These results indicate a potential link between the consumption of curdled dairy products and electoral inclinations, paving the whey for further exploration into the intersection of gastronomy and governance.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
When it comes to politics, the correlation between dietary habits and voting behavior may not be the first thing that comes to mind. However, as the old adage goes, "you are what you eat," and it seems that your political leanings might also be influenced by what you choose to consume. In this study, we aim to explore the rather unexpected relationship between the consumption of cottage cheese and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in the state of Arkansas. Who would have thought that dairy products could be so politically inclined? We'll certainly explore this topic with great “cheddar” and delve into the “whey” of this intriguing phenomenon.
While research into the intersection of gastronomy and governance may seem unconventional, it is crucial to consider the potential impact of dietary habits on political decision-making. After all, as citizens head to the polls, they bring with them not just their political convictions, but also their dietary proclivities. Whether it’s cheesy puns or straight-laced statistical analysis, there's no denying that this topic is certainly not "brie-lliant" but also a fascinating avenue for exploration.
As we embark on this research journey, we aim to unravel the potential link between cottage cheese consumption and voting patterns with the “grate”est precision. By leveraging data from reputable sources such as the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, in conjunction with the Harvard Dataverse, we seek to bring a “gouda” blend of empirical rigor and statistical analysis to this rather unusual subject matter.
With the political landscape constantly evolving, it is essential to “milk” every possible avenue for understanding voter behavior. The findings of this study may have far-reaching implications, potentially shedding light on the hitherto unexplored influence of dairy products on political preferences. So, grab a spoonful of cottage cheese, or perhaps a slice of cheese for those lactose intolerant, and let's delve into the “wheys” of this intriguing relationship between curds and Democrats in the state of Arkansas.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The examination of the relationship between cottage cheese consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Arkansas yielded some utterly captivating results. Our analysis from 1990 to 2020 revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8216258, indicating a remarkably strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.6750689 further highlights the substantial proportion of variance in the Democrat votes that can be explained by the consumption of this curdled delicacy.

The statistical analysis unveiled a p-value of less than 0.05, signaling a significant relationship between cottage cheese consumption and voting patterns in Arkansas. In essence, the evidence suggests that the higher the consumption of cottage cheese, the greater the propensity for casting a vote for the Democrat presidential candidate. It seems that political inclinations may indeed be curdy in nature.

Furthermore, in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually portrays the robust correlation between cottage cheese consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate, providing a compelling snapshot of this unexpected connection.

These intriguing findings prompt a reevaluation of the phrase "say cheese," as it appears that the political landscape in Arkansas may have a distinctive dairy flavor. This research sheds light on the potential influence of cheese on the voting booth, stirring up a blend of curiosity and amusement. As we digest these results, it becomes apparent that when it comes to political choices, perhaps we should brie more mindful of our dairy preferences. This study sets the stage for further exploration into the intersection of food habits and electoral tendencies, offering a slice of insight into the uncharted realm of dairy-driven democracy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cottage cheese consumption and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Arkansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Curds and Democrats: An Examination of Cottage Cheese Consumption and Voting Patterns in Arkansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between dairy consumption and political preferences by exploring the connection between cottage cheese consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in the state of Arkansas. Leveraging data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, in conjunction with the Harvard Dataverse, we scrutinized voting patterns from 1990 to 2020. Our findings suggest a remarkably strong correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8216258 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05. These results indicate a potential link between the consumption of curdled dairy products and electoral inclinations, paving the whey for further exploration into the intersection of gastronomy and governance.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The prevailing literature on the intersection between dairy consumption and political behavior offers a mix of traditional scholarly inquiry and a sprinkle of whimsy that is befitting of such a peculiar topic. Smith et al. (2015) examined the relationship between cheese consumption and civic engagement, finding that individuals who consumed more cheese showed greater participation in political events. While their study did not specifically focus on cottage cheese, it lays a foundation for understanding the potential impact of dairy products on political inclinations.
Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the societal implications of dairy preferences, uncovering a nuanced connection between milk-based products and social affiliations. Their findings hinted at the possibility of dairy choices influencing broader sociopolitical leanings, albeit without explicitly delving into the specific political party preferences associated with cottage cheese consumption.
As we move closer to the crux of our investigation, it is imperative to consider the broader cultural and literary discourse surrounding dairy products and their potential influence on political predilections. In "Milk and the Political Sphere" by A. Dairy (2017), the author explores the historical symbolism of dairy products in political movements, emphasizing the societal significance of milk and cheese throughout the annals of governance. Though not explicitly focused on cottage cheese, the thematic exploration provides an insightful backdrop for our endeavors.
Turning to the fictional realm, "Curds and Conspiracies" by Brie Tanner (2019) offers a whimsical perspective on the clandestine world of dairy intrigue, weaving a tale of political subterfuge involving, unsurprisingly, cottage cheese as a central plot device. While certainly a work of fiction, the novel inadvertently underscores the intrigue and mystery surrounding the potential influence of cottage cheese on political proclivities.
On a lighter note, several children's shows and cartoons have subtly depicted the intersection of dairy products and political preferences. "The Case of the Missing Cottage Cheese" in the animated series "Curd Detectives" and the recurring motif of cottage cheese in "Moo-tropolis: Dairy Dynamics" serve as lighthearted yet surprisingly relevant cultural representations of the potential link between dairy consumption and political leanings. While these may not directly contribute to empirical research, they certainly add an element of levity to our exploration.
With the chorus of scholarly works, literary musings, and cultural representations echoing in the background, we find ourselves standing at the cusp of a rather "cheesy" yet undeniably intriguing confluence of gastronomy and governance. As we plunge into the empirical terrain, it becomes evident that our inquiry into the curious relationship between cottage cheese consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Arkansas is both unprecedented and ripe with potential for unexpected discoveries.

[[RESULTS]]
The examination of the relationship between cottage cheese consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Arkansas yielded some utterly captivating results. Our analysis from 1990 to 2020 revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8216258, indicating a remarkably strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.6750689 further highlights the substantial proportion of variance in the Democrat votes that can be explained by the consumption of this curdled delicacy.
The statistical analysis unveiled a p-value of less than 0.05, signaling a significant relationship between cottage cheese consumption and voting patterns in Arkansas. In essence, the evidence suggests that the higher the consumption of cottage cheese, the greater the propensity for casting a vote for the Democrat presidential candidate. It seems that political inclinations may indeed be curdy in nature.
Furthermore, in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually portrays the robust correlation between cottage cheese consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate, providing a compelling snapshot of this unexpected connection.
These intriguing findings prompt a reevaluation of the phrase "say cheese," as it appears that the political landscape in Arkansas may have a distinctive dairy flavor. This research sheds light on the potential influence of cheese on the voting booth, stirring up a blend of curiosity and amusement. As we digest these results, it becomes apparent that when it comes to political choices, perhaps we should brie more mindful of our dairy preferences. This study sets the stage for further exploration into the intersection of food habits and electoral tendencies, offering a slice of insight into the uncharted realm of dairy-driven democracy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our investigation unveil a rather intriguing connection between cottage cheese consumption and voting behavior in Arkansas. Our results provide empirical support for the curious inquiries and subtle whimsy that abound in the existing literature on dairy products and political predilections. The correlation coefficient of 0.8216258 aligns with the spirit of exploratory scholarship embodied by Smith et al. (2015) and their examination of cheese consumption and civic engagement. While our study focuses on a specific dairy product, the resounding correlation offers a curdled affirmation of the potential impact of dairy choices on political inclinations.

In light of our results, it is worth revisiting the lighthearted yet strangely relevant cultural representations cited in the literature review. The animated series "Curd Detectives" and the motif of cottage cheese in "Moo-tropolis: Dairy Dynamics" may indeed serve as tongue-in-cheek yet eerily prescient reflections of the underlying relationship between dairy consumption and political leanings. Although not empirical in nature, these cultural depictions offer a charming backdrop to our statistically significant findings.

Furthermore, our results hint at a potential extension of A. Dairy's (2017) exploration of the historical significance of dairy products in political movements. While A. Dairy's work delves into the broader societal symbolism of milk and cheese, our study introduces a contemporary twist by uncovering a tangible connection between cottage cheese consumption and voting patterns. It seems that the longstanding historical relevance of dairy products in governance may very well extend to the modern-day act of casting a vote.

The statistical significance of the relationship between cottage cheese consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Arkansas offers a compelling infusion of empirical evidence into the longstanding literary and cultural discourse surrounding dairy products and politics. As we reflect on the unexpected resonance of our findings with the whimsical musings and thematic explorations presented in the literature review, it becomes clear that the seemingly "cheesy" intersection of gastronomy and governance has more substance than meets the eye.

In essence, our study illuminates a hitherto unexplored facet of the dairy-driven democracy, highlighting the rather unexpected influence of cottage cheese on electoral tendencies. As we savor the unexpected confluence of food habits and political choices, it is evident that the age-old adage "you are what you eat" may hold a kernel of truth, or perhaps a curd of truth, in the realm of political behavior. These findings invite further scholarly inquiry into the intricate interplay between dietary preferences and electoral allegiances, effectively turning the phrase "say cheese" into a thought-provoking invitation to delve into the multifaceted world of dairy-driven democracy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cottage cheese consumption and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Arkansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Curds and Democrats: An Examination of Cottage Cheese Consumption and Voting Patterns in Arkansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between dairy consumption and political preferences by exploring the connection between cottage cheese consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in the state of Arkansas. Leveraging data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, in conjunction with the Harvard Dataverse, we scrutinized voting patterns from 1990 to 2020. Our findings suggest a remarkably strong correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8216258 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05. These results indicate a potential link between the consumption of curdled dairy products and electoral inclinations, paving the whey for further exploration into the intersection of gastronomy and governance.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
When it comes to politics, the correlation between dietary habits and voting behavior may not be the first thing that comes to mind. However, as the old adage goes, "you are what you eat," and it seems that your political leanings might also be influenced by what you choose to consume. In this study, we aim to explore the rather unexpected relationship between the consumption of cottage cheese and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in the state of Arkansas. Who would have thought that dairy products could be so politically inclined? We'll certainly explore this topic with great “cheddar” and delve into the “whey” of this intriguing phenomenon.
While research into the intersection of gastronomy and governance may seem unconventional, it is crucial to consider the potential impact of dietary habits on political decision-making. After all, as citizens head to the polls, they bring with them not just their political convictions, but also their dietary proclivities. Whether it’s cheesy puns or straight-laced statistical analysis, there's no denying that this topic is certainly not "brie-lliant" but also a fascinating avenue for exploration.
As we embark on this research journey, we aim to unravel the potential link between cottage cheese consumption and voting patterns with the “grate”est precision. By leveraging data from reputable sources such as the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, in conjunction with the Harvard Dataverse, we seek to bring a “gouda” blend of empirical rigor and statistical analysis to this rather unusual subject matter.
With the political landscape constantly evolving, it is essential to “milk” every possible avenue for understanding voter behavior. The findings of this study may have far-reaching implications, potentially shedding light on the hitherto unexplored influence of dairy products on political preferences. So, grab a spoonful of cottage cheese, or perhaps a slice of cheese for those lactose intolerant, and let's delve into the “wheys” of this intriguing relationship between curds and Democrats in the state of Arkansas.

[[RESULTS]]
The examination of the relationship between cottage cheese consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Arkansas yielded some utterly captivating results. Our analysis from 1990 to 2020 revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8216258, indicating a remarkably strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.6750689 further highlights the substantial proportion of variance in the Democrat votes that can be explained by the consumption of this curdled delicacy.
The statistical analysis unveiled a p-value of less than 0.05, signaling a significant relationship between cottage cheese consumption and voting patterns in Arkansas. In essence, the evidence suggests that the higher the consumption of cottage cheese, the greater the propensity for casting a vote for the Democrat presidential candidate. It seems that political inclinations may indeed be curdy in nature.
Furthermore, in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually portrays the robust correlation between cottage cheese consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate, providing a compelling snapshot of this unexpected connection.
These intriguing findings prompt a reevaluation of the phrase "say cheese," as it appears that the political landscape in Arkansas may have a distinctive dairy flavor. This research sheds light on the potential influence of cheese on the voting booth, stirring up a blend of curiosity and amusement. As we digest these results, it becomes apparent that when it comes to political choices, perhaps we should brie more mindful of our dairy preferences. This study sets the stage for further exploration into the intersection of food habits and electoral tendencies, offering a slice of insight into the uncharted realm of dairy-driven democracy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unveiled a rather cheesy yet compelling relationship between cottage cheese consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in Arkansas. The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8216258 indeed suggests a curiously strong positive association, leaving us feeling rather "gouda" about this line of inquiry. It appears that in the realm of electoral decision-making, dairy preferences might just be a wedge issue.

While some may find it "feta-compli" to take such an unorthodox approach to understanding political behavior, our results warrant further investigation into the potential impact of curdled dairy products on voting inclinations. Perhaps we should ponder not just the issues but also the "wheys" in which voters arrive at their decisions.

As we wrap up this study, it's evident that the path to political preferences may indeed be paved with cheese. The findings of this research open up a "grate" debate on the extent to which dairy products permeate the political realm, offering a refreshing perspective on the age-old adage, "you can't have your cheese and eat it too."

With that said, it can be confidently stated that no more research in this area is needed, as we believe we have "milked" this topic for all it's worth. This study not only provides "gouda" food for thought but also serves as a testament to the astute researcher who knows that when it comes to understanding voter behavior, there's no harm in adding a little "cheddar" to the statistical analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Curds and Democrats: An Examination of Cottage Cheese Consumption and Voting Patterns in Arkansas. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Dairy Democracy


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Curds and Democrats: An Examination of Cottage Cheese Consumption and Voting Patterns in Arkansas. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Dairy Studies and Behavioral Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Curds and Democrats: An Examination of Cottage Cheese Consumption and Voting Patterns in Arkansas with an abstract of This study delves into the curious relationship between dairy consumption and political preferences by exploring the connection between cottage cheese consumption and votes for the Democrat presidential candidate in the state of Arkansas. Leveraging data from the USDA and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, in conjunction with the Harvard Dataverse, we scrutinized voting patterns from 1990 to 2020. Our findings suggest a remarkably strong correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8216258 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05. These results indicate a potential link between the consumption of curdled dairy products and electoral inclinations, paving the whey for further exploration into the intersection of gastronomy and governance.

ChatGPT:

cottage cheese consumption, voting patterns, Arkansas, dairy consumption, political preferences, Democrat presidential candidate, USDA data, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, voting patterns 1990-2020, correlation coefficient, p-value, curdled dairy products, electoral inclinations, gastronomy and governance

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Cottage cheese consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of Cottage cheese in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with Cottage cheese consumption

Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Arkansas
Detailed data title: Total votes cast for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Arkansas
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Arkansas

Correlation r = 0.8216258 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6750689 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 67.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Arkansas) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Cottage cheese consumption) over the 8 years from 1990 through 2020.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.012. 0.0123580645673949630000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 1.2% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 81 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.28, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19921996200020042008201220162020
Cottage cheese consumption (Pounds per person)3.12.62.62.72.32.32.22
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Arkansas (Total votes)505823475171422768469953422310394409380494423932




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3.1,2.6,2.6,2.7,2.3,2.3,2.2,2,])
array_2 = np.array([505823,475171,422768,469953,422310,394409,380494,423932,])
array_1_name = "Cottage cheese consumption"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Arkansas"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 5313 · Black Variable ID: 556 · Red Variable ID: 25952
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0