about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,306 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Odalys and the second variable is Air pollution in Prescott, Arizona.  The chart goes from 1981 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Whenever someone shouted, "Odalys be driving me crazy!" it led to a surge in car usage and consequently, air pollution in Prescott, Arizona. It seems like Odalys just couldn't help but make the air a little od-aly-s-ted!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a vibrant pop art style scene in downtown Prescott, Arizona. The focus is on a towering billboard displaying the name "Odalys" in bold and bright letters, capturing the attention of onlookers. A group of animated people can be seen nearby, expressing their exasperation with the phrase "Odalys be driving me crazy!" as they witness a sudden influx of cars flooding the streets. The influx of vehicles introduces thick clouds of air pollution into the once-clear sky, evoking a sense of chaos and distortion. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Odalys and Air pollution in Prescott, Arizona. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Pop art Data cyber art Surrealism Cyberpunk Vaporwave
ChatGPT: Pop art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Odalys and Air pollution in Prescott, Arizona, in the following situation: Whenever someone shouted, "Odalys be driving me crazy!" it led to a surge in car usage and consequently, air pollution in Prescott, Arizona. It seems like Odalys just couldn't help but make the air a little od-aly-s-ted!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In downtown Prescott, Arizona, a big billboard displays the popularity of the first name Odalys, with the name shining bright in bold letters. Nearby, a group of people shout, "Odalys be driving me crazy!" and in response, a sudden surge of cars fill the streets, releasing thick clouds of air pollution into the sky. The name Odalys seems to have an unusual effect on the air quality of Prescott, making it feel a bit "od-aly-s-ted" indeed.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Pop art ] and depicting this scene: In downtown Prescott, Arizona, a big billboard displays the popularity of the first name Odalys, with the name shining bright in bold letters. Nearby, a group of people shout, "Odalys be driving me crazy!" and in response, a sudden surge of cars fill the streets, releasing thick clouds of air pollution into the sky. The name Odalys seems to have an unusual effect on the air quality of Prescott, making it feel a bit "od-aly-s-ted" indeed. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a vibrant pop art style scene in downtown Prescott, Arizona. The focus is on a towering billboard displaying the name "Odalys" in bold and bright letters, capturing the attention of onlookers. A group of animated people can be seen nearby, expressing their exasperation with the phrase "Odalys be driving me crazy!" as they witness a sudden influx of cars flooding the streets. The influx of vehicles introduces thick clouds of air pollution into the once-clear sky, evoking a sense of chaos and distortion.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Popularity of the first name Odalys positively influenced Air pollution in Prescott, Arizona. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Odalys Odyssey: Airing out the Correlation Between Name Popularity and Air Pollution in Prescott

The Journal of Environmental Ergonomics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Odalys and Air pollution in Prescott, Arizona. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8839906 and p < 0.01 for 1981 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Odalys Odyssey: Airing out the Correlation Between Name Popularity and Air Pollution in Prescott"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to investigate the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Odalys and the levels of air pollution in the charming city of Prescott, Arizona. By utilizing data meticulously collected from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team sought to uncover any surprising connections between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through rigorous analysis, we uncovered a startling correlation coefficient of 0.8839906 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 1981 to 2020. Our findings offer a lighthearted yet thought-provoking glimpse into the potential influence of name trends on environmental conditions, inviting readers to ponder the whimsical side of statistical exploration. So, take a deep breath and join us in exploring the intriguing "Odalys Odyssey" through the whimsical lens of academic research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Odalys and Air pollution in Prescott, Arizona. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Odalys Odyssey: Airing out the Correlation Between Name Popularity and Air Pollution in Prescott"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to investigate the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Odalys and the levels of air pollution in the charming city of Prescott, Arizona. By utilizing data meticulously collected from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team sought to uncover any surprising connections between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through rigorous analysis, we uncovered a startling correlation coefficient of 0.8839906 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 1981 to 2020. Our findings offer a lighthearted yet thought-provoking glimpse into the potential influence of name trends on environmental conditions, inviting readers to ponder the whimsical side of statistical exploration. So, take a deep breath and join us in exploring the intriguing "Odalys Odyssey" through the whimsical lens of academic research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Gather round, curious minds, as we embark on a peculiar expedition through the untamed wilderness of statistics and nomenclature. Picture it – the sun-dappled streets of Prescott, Arizona, where the scent of pine mingles playfully with the tang of scientific inquiry. Here, in this charming city, we encountered a conundrum so delightfully absurd it could only be found in the annals of academic whimsy. Our quest? To unravel the enigmatic correlation between the popularity of the first name Odalys and the wily dance of air pollutants.

As intrepid explorers armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and the stalwart Environmental Protection Agency, we traversed the peaks and valleys of statistical analysis in search of the unexpected. When our journey reached its climax, we uncovered a correlation coefficient so robust it would make even the most stoic of scientists raise an eyebrow in bemusement – a staggering 0.8839906! And to top it off, the significance level of p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1981 to 2020 removed any lingering doubt that this correlation was more than just a flight of fancy.

Now, let's pause for a moment and savor the sheer nonsensical joy of it all. Odalys, a name of mystery and intrigue, weaves its playful tendrils into the very fabric of Prescott's atmosphere. Could it be that this seemingly innocuous moniker exerts an unseen influence on the fluctuating levels of air pollutants? Could the whims of nomenclature be entangled in the tapestry of environmental conditions, painting a delightful picture of serendipity and statistical splendor?

Join us, dear readers, as we wend our merry way through this lighthearted romp of exploration. As we delve into the intersection of name trends and environmental phenomena, let us revel in the unexpected delights of "Odalys Odyssey." After all, what is science if not a delightful romp through the land of probabilities and puns, where correlations and causations frolic hand in hand? So fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a journey that will tickle your funny bone and dazzle your statistical sensibilities!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Odalys and Air pollution in Prescott, Arizona. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Odalys Odyssey: Airing out the Correlation Between Name Popularity and Air Pollution in Prescott"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to investigate the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Odalys and the levels of air pollution in the charming city of Prescott, Arizona. By utilizing data meticulously collected from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team sought to uncover any surprising connections between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through rigorous analysis, we uncovered a startling correlation coefficient of 0.8839906 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 1981 to 2020. Our findings offer a lighthearted yet thought-provoking glimpse into the potential influence of name trends on environmental conditions, inviting readers to ponder the whimsical side of statistical exploration. So, take a deep breath and join us in exploring the intriguing "Odalys Odyssey" through the whimsical lens of academic research.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Gather round, curious minds, as we embark on a peculiar expedition through the untamed wilderness of statistics and nomenclature. Picture it – the sun-dappled streets of Prescott, Arizona, where the scent of pine mingles playfully with the tang of scientific inquiry. Here, in this charming city, we encountered a conundrum so delightfully absurd it could only be found in the annals of academic whimsy. Our quest? To unravel the enigmatic correlation between the popularity of the first name Odalys and the wily dance of air pollutants.
As intrepid explorers armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and the stalwart Environmental Protection Agency, we traversed the peaks and valleys of statistical analysis in search of the unexpected. When our journey reached its climax, we uncovered a correlation coefficient so robust it would make even the most stoic of scientists raise an eyebrow in bemusement – a staggering 0.8839906! And to top it off, the significance level of p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1981 to 2020 removed any lingering doubt that this correlation was more than just a flight of fancy.
Now, let's pause for a moment and savor the sheer nonsensical joy of it all. Odalys, a name of mystery and intrigue, weaves its playful tendrils into the very fabric of Prescott's atmosphere. Could it be that this seemingly innocuous moniker exerts an unseen influence on the fluctuating levels of air pollutants? Could the whims of nomenclature be entangled in the tapestry of environmental conditions, painting a delightful picture of serendipity and statistical splendor?
Join us, dear readers, as we wend our merry way through this lighthearted romp of exploration. As we delve into the intersection of name trends and environmental phenomena, let us revel in the unexpected delights of "Odalys Odyssey." After all, what is science if not a delightful romp through the land of probabilities and puns, where correlations and causations frolic hand in hand? So fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a journey that will tickle your funny bone and dazzle your statistical sensibilities!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The authors find that the correlation between the popularity of the first name Odalys and the levels of air pollution in Prescott, Arizona is indeed an intriguing subject that has sparked both curiosity and disbelief. In the study by Smith et al. (2017), the unprecedented link between personal nomenclature and environmental factors is explored with a seriousness that demands attention. However, as we dive deeper into this whimsical investigation, we find ourselves in a delightful, albeit peculiar, landscape of literature.

Moving on to more esoteric sources, Doe, Johnson, and Thompson (2019) delve into the potential psychological effects of sharing a name with Prescott’s air pollutants, shedding light on the often overlooked intersection of identity and atmospheric composition. Amidst this scholarly pursuit, we cannot ignore the seminal work of Jones and Brown (2015), which presents a comprehensive analysis of the social implications of name correlations in the context of environmental phenomena. The gravity of such findings cannot be overstated, leading us to ponder the profound impact of nomenclature on our surroundings in a truly whimsical manner.

Branching out to related yet unconventional literature, "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Guide to Atmospheric Quirks" by A. Weatherman provides a non-fictional take on the subject matter, offering insights into the whimsical nature of atmospheric conditions and their potential ties to the popularity of certain names. Furthermore, "The Name Game: An Exploration of Linguistic Influence on Environmental Oddities" by A. Lexicologist introduces a linguistic approach to understanding the fanciful intricacies of name trends and their interplay with environmental elements.

In a rather unexpected turn, the fictional works of "Pollen Perils: A Tale of Environmental Mysteries" by E. Novelista and "Aerostardust Adventures: The Enigmatic Odalys Connection" by L. Playwrite offer imaginative narratives that, while not grounded in empirical data, contribute to the lighthearted exploration of our research topic. These whimsical literary forays serve as beacons of mirth in an otherwise serious academic landscape, proving that even the most fantastical tales can inspire scholarly inquiry.

As we wade further into the charming absurdity of our research, it would be remiss not to consider the tidbits of knowledge gleaned from childhood cartoons and television shows. "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" and "The Magic School Bus" both offer a whimsical take on environmental education, sparking a sense of wonder that is both endearing and enlightening. The sprightly antics of these animated adventures bring a touch of levity to our scholarly pursuits, reminding us that even in the realm of academic inquiry, there is room for lightheartedness and mirth.

In the spirit of the whimsical nature of our research, we must acknowledge that while the journey is serious, the destination promises a delightful concoction of merriment, statistical intrigue, and a dash of absurdity. So, with a twinkle in our eye and a spring in our step, let us press on and uncover the quirks and caprices of "Odalys Odyssey" with an eagerness that reflects the sheer joy of whimsical exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Odalys and Air pollution in Prescott, Arizona. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 1981 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Odalys Odyssey: Airing out the Correlation Between Name Popularity and Air Pollution in Prescott"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to investigate the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Odalys and the levels of air pollution in the charming city of Prescott, Arizona. By utilizing data meticulously collected from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team sought to uncover any surprising connections between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through rigorous analysis, we uncovered a startling correlation coefficient of 0.8839906 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 1981 to 2020. Our findings offer a lighthearted yet thought-provoking glimpse into the potential influence of name trends on environmental conditions, inviting readers to ponder the whimsical side of statistical exploration. So, take a deep breath and join us in exploring the intriguing "Odalys Odyssey" through the whimsical lens of academic research.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Gather round, curious minds, as we embark on a peculiar expedition through the untamed wilderness of statistics and nomenclature. Picture it – the sun-dappled streets of Prescott, Arizona, where the scent of pine mingles playfully with the tang of scientific inquiry. Here, in this charming city, we encountered a conundrum so delightfully absurd it could only be found in the annals of academic whimsy. Our quest? To unravel the enigmatic correlation between the popularity of the first name Odalys and the wily dance of air pollutants.
As intrepid explorers armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and the stalwart Environmental Protection Agency, we traversed the peaks and valleys of statistical analysis in search of the unexpected. When our journey reached its climax, we uncovered a correlation coefficient so robust it would make even the most stoic of scientists raise an eyebrow in bemusement – a staggering 0.8839906! And to top it off, the significance level of p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1981 to 2020 removed any lingering doubt that this correlation was more than just a flight of fancy.
Now, let's pause for a moment and savor the sheer nonsensical joy of it all. Odalys, a name of mystery and intrigue, weaves its playful tendrils into the very fabric of Prescott's atmosphere. Could it be that this seemingly innocuous moniker exerts an unseen influence on the fluctuating levels of air pollutants? Could the whims of nomenclature be entangled in the tapestry of environmental conditions, painting a delightful picture of serendipity and statistical splendor?
Join us, dear readers, as we wend our merry way through this lighthearted romp of exploration. As we delve into the intersection of name trends and environmental phenomena, let us revel in the unexpected delights of "Odalys Odyssey." After all, what is science if not a delightful romp through the land of probabilities and puns, where correlations and causations frolic hand in hand? So fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a journey that will tickle your funny bone and dazzle your statistical sensibilities!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the beguiling mystery of the correlation between the enchanting name Odalys and the whimsical world of air pollution in the charming city of Prescott, Arizona, our research team harnessed a medley of data collection methods that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow in bemusement. With a sprinkle of whimsy and a dash of statistical gusto, we embarked on a captivating quest to decipher the tangled dance of nomenclature and environmental phenomena.

Data Collection:
Our intrepid team set sail on the vast seas of the internet, armed with a treasure map of data sources. We plundered the cornucopia of statistical knowledge, drawing upon the bountiful archives of the US Social Security Administration and plundering the troves of environmental wisdom within the halls of the Environmental Protection Agency. After navigating the tumultuous waves of information, we emerged victorious with a treasure trove of data spanning from the epoch of 1981 to the year 2020.

The Popularity of Odalys:
To gauge the ebbs and flows of the name Odalys, we consulted the hallowed archives of the US Social Security Administration. Like intrepid sailors navigating the fickle winds of name trends, we delved into the annals of birth records to extract the yearly counts of little Odalyses making their debut in the world. With each new birth, the ripples of nomenclature reverberated through the corridors of statistical significance, birthing a delightful tapestry of name trends.

Exposure to Air Pollution:
Navigating the sprawling labyrinth of environmental data, we unfurled the sails of statistical inquiry and charted the courses of air pollution in Prescott, Arizona. Drawing upon the wisdom of the Environmental Protection Agency, we gleaned the concentrations of atmospheric pollutants, painting a vivid portrait of Prescott's atmospheric whims.

Statistical Analysis:
Armed with our treasure trove of data, we unfurled the maps of statistical analysis and charted a course for significance. Our expedition through the seas of correlation led to the discovery of a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8839906, a wondrous testament to the enchanting dance between the popularity of Odalys and the capricious swirl of air pollutants. The significance level of p < 0.01 added a final flourish to our findings, banishing any doubts that this correlation was anything but a delightful confluence of statistical serendipity.

In conclusion, our methodology served as the compass guiding our expedition through the whimsical depths of nomenclature and environmental intrigue. With a hearty dose of statistical vigor and a touch of lightheartedness, we unraveled the enigmatic "Odalys Odyssey," inviting readers to revel in the delightful confluence of name trends and atmospheric whims with us.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Odalys and Air pollution in Prescott, Arizona. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency .

For the time period 1981 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8839906, r-squared of 0.7814394, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Odalys Odyssey: Airing out the Correlation Between Name Popularity and Air Pollution in Prescott"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to investigate the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Odalys and the levels of air pollution in the charming city of Prescott, Arizona. By utilizing data meticulously collected from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team sought to uncover any surprising connections between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through rigorous analysis, we uncovered a startling correlation coefficient of 0.8839906 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 1981 to 2020. Our findings offer a lighthearted yet thought-provoking glimpse into the potential influence of name trends on environmental conditions, inviting readers to ponder the whimsical side of statistical exploration. So, take a deep breath and join us in exploring the intriguing "Odalys Odyssey" through the whimsical lens of academic research.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Gather round, curious minds, as we embark on a peculiar expedition through the untamed wilderness of statistics and nomenclature. Picture it – the sun-dappled streets of Prescott, Arizona, where the scent of pine mingles playfully with the tang of scientific inquiry. Here, in this charming city, we encountered a conundrum so delightfully absurd it could only be found in the annals of academic whimsy. Our quest? To unravel the enigmatic correlation between the popularity of the first name Odalys and the wily dance of air pollutants.
As intrepid explorers armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and the stalwart Environmental Protection Agency, we traversed the peaks and valleys of statistical analysis in search of the unexpected. When our journey reached its climax, we uncovered a correlation coefficient so robust it would make even the most stoic of scientists raise an eyebrow in bemusement – a staggering 0.8839906! And to top it off, the significance level of p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1981 to 2020 removed any lingering doubt that this correlation was more than just a flight of fancy.
Now, let's pause for a moment and savor the sheer nonsensical joy of it all. Odalys, a name of mystery and intrigue, weaves its playful tendrils into the very fabric of Prescott's atmosphere. Could it be that this seemingly innocuous moniker exerts an unseen influence on the fluctuating levels of air pollutants? Could the whims of nomenclature be entangled in the tapestry of environmental conditions, painting a delightful picture of serendipity and statistical splendor?
Join us, dear readers, as we wend our merry way through this lighthearted romp of exploration. As we delve into the intersection of name trends and environmental phenomena, let us revel in the unexpected delights of "Odalys Odyssey." After all, what is science if not a delightful romp through the land of probabilities and puns, where correlations and causations frolic hand in hand? So fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a journey that will tickle your funny bone and dazzle your statistical sensibilities!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:


RESULTS

In the realm of whimsical statistics, our journey through the mysterious connection between the first name Odalys and the swirling winds of air pollution in Prescott, Arizona has yielded a confluence of astonishing findings. As we gazed at our scatterplot with the kind of bemused wonder usually reserved for discovering a unicorn, we found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8839906. This hearty statistical handshake suggests a robust relationship between the popularity of the name Odalys and the atmospheric capers of pollutants, leaving us to ponder the enigmatic dance of causation and correlation in the whimsical world of research.

The r-squared value of 0.7814394 serves as a whimsical waltz partner to our correlation coefficient, indicating that approximately 78.14% of the variation in air pollution levels can be explained by the popularity of the name Odalys. Oh, the delightful capriciousness of it all! The significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 1981 to 2020 adds an air of certainty to our findings, akin to stumbling upon a chest full of statistical treasures at the end of a rainbow.

Figure 1 depicts our scatterplot, a visual testament to the delightful dalliance between the popularity of Odalys and the ebb and flow of air pollution in Prescott. Behold the whimsical dance of data points as they twirl and cavort, painting a portrait of unexpected camaraderie between a name and the invisible tendrils of environmental conditions. It's a sight to behold, a serendipitous blend of statistical rigor and lighthearted marvel.

This journey through the Escher-like maze of statistical inquiry and unpredictable variables has left us with a hearty chuckle and a new appreciation for the playful side of research. Together, we have unraveled a charming curiosity and uncovered the potential influence of nomenclature on the whims of air pollutants. The results of our investigation stand as a testament to the delightfully off-kilter nature of statistical exploration, urging us to embrace the unexpected and revel in the whimsical tapestry of correlations and causations.

In our wide-eyed wanderings through the land of data, we have caught a glimpse of the peculiar tango between the first name Odalys and the mischievous antics of air pollution, inviting us to ponder the interplay between names and nature in this lighthearted romp of academic inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Odalys and Air pollution in Prescott, Arizona. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Odalys Odyssey: Airing out the Correlation Between Name Popularity and Air Pollution in Prescott"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to investigate the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Odalys and the levels of air pollution in the charming city of Prescott, Arizona. By utilizing data meticulously collected from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team sought to uncover any surprising connections between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through rigorous analysis, we uncovered a startling correlation coefficient of 0.8839906 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 1981 to 2020. Our findings offer a lighthearted yet thought-provoking glimpse into the potential influence of name trends on environmental conditions, inviting readers to ponder the whimsical side of statistical exploration. So, take a deep breath and join us in exploring the intriguing "Odalys Odyssey" through the whimsical lens of academic research.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The authors find that the correlation between the popularity of the first name Odalys and the levels of air pollution in Prescott, Arizona is indeed an intriguing subject that has sparked both curiosity and disbelief. In the study by Smith et al. (2017), the unprecedented link between personal nomenclature and environmental factors is explored with a seriousness that demands attention. However, as we dive deeper into this whimsical investigation, we find ourselves in a delightful, albeit peculiar, landscape of literature.
Moving on to more esoteric sources, Doe, Johnson, and Thompson (2019) delve into the potential psychological effects of sharing a name with Prescott’s air pollutants, shedding light on the often overlooked intersection of identity and atmospheric composition. Amidst this scholarly pursuit, we cannot ignore the seminal work of Jones and Brown (2015), which presents a comprehensive analysis of the social implications of name correlations in the context of environmental phenomena. The gravity of such findings cannot be overstated, leading us to ponder the profound impact of nomenclature on our surroundings in a truly whimsical manner.
Branching out to related yet unconventional literature, "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Guide to Atmospheric Quirks" by A. Weatherman provides a non-fictional take on the subject matter, offering insights into the whimsical nature of atmospheric conditions and their potential ties to the popularity of certain names. Furthermore, "The Name Game: An Exploration of Linguistic Influence on Environmental Oddities" by A. Lexicologist introduces a linguistic approach to understanding the fanciful intricacies of name trends and their interplay with environmental elements.
In a rather unexpected turn, the fictional works of "Pollen Perils: A Tale of Environmental Mysteries" by E. Novelista and "Aerostardust Adventures: The Enigmatic Odalys Connection" by L. Playwrite offer imaginative narratives that, while not grounded in empirical data, contribute to the lighthearted exploration of our research topic. These whimsical literary forays serve as beacons of mirth in an otherwise serious academic landscape, proving that even the most fantastical tales can inspire scholarly inquiry.
As we wade further into the charming absurdity of our research, it would be remiss not to consider the tidbits of knowledge gleaned from childhood cartoons and television shows. "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" and "The Magic School Bus" both offer a whimsical take on environmental education, sparking a sense of wonder that is both endearing and enlightening. The sprightly antics of these animated adventures bring a touch of levity to our scholarly pursuits, reminding us that even in the realm of academic inquiry, there is room for lightheartedness and mirth.
In the spirit of the whimsical nature of our research, we must acknowledge that while the journey is serious, the destination promises a delightful concoction of merriment, statistical intrigue, and a dash of absurdity. So, with a twinkle in our eye and a spring in our step, let us press on and uncover the quirks and caprices of "Odalys Odyssey" with an eagerness that reflects the sheer joy of whimsical exploration.

[[RESULTS]]
RESULTS
In the realm of whimsical statistics, our journey through the mysterious connection between the first name Odalys and the swirling winds of air pollution in Prescott, Arizona has yielded a confluence of astonishing findings. As we gazed at our scatterplot with the kind of bemused wonder usually reserved for discovering a unicorn, we found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8839906. This hearty statistical handshake suggests a robust relationship between the popularity of the name Odalys and the atmospheric capers of pollutants, leaving us to ponder the enigmatic dance of causation and correlation in the whimsical world of research.
The r-squared value of 0.7814394 serves as a whimsical waltz partner to our correlation coefficient, indicating that approximately 78.14% of the variation in air pollution levels can be explained by the popularity of the name Odalys. Oh, the delightful capriciousness of it all! The significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 1981 to 2020 adds an air of certainty to our findings, akin to stumbling upon a chest full of statistical treasures at the end of a rainbow.
Figure 1 depicts our scatterplot, a visual testament to the delightful dalliance between the popularity of Odalys and the ebb and flow of air pollution in Prescott. Behold the whimsical dance of data points as they twirl and cavort, painting a portrait of unexpected camaraderie between a name and the invisible tendrils of environmental conditions. It's a sight to behold, a serendipitous blend of statistical rigor and lighthearted marvel.
This journey through the Escher-like maze of statistical inquiry and unpredictable variables has left us with a hearty chuckle and a new appreciation for the playful side of research. Together, we have unraveled a charming curiosity and uncovered the potential influence of nomenclature on the whims of air pollutants. The results of our investigation stand as a testament to the delightfully off-kilter nature of statistical exploration, urging us to embrace the unexpected and revel in the whimsical tapestry of correlations and causations.
In our wide-eyed wanderings through the land of data, we have caught a glimpse of the peculiar tango between the first name Odalys and the mischievous antics of air pollution, inviting us to ponder the interplay between names and nature in this lighthearted romp of academic inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

DISCUSSION

Introducing the whimsical wanderings of our discussion section, where we unravel the delightful dance between the name Odalys and the mischievous capers of air pollution in Prescott, Arizona. Our findings, standing as steadfast sentinels of statistical whimsy, fortify the slightly off-kilter yet strangely charming inquiries put forth by previous scholarly endeavors.

In our whimsical excursion through the literary landscape, we couldn't help but take a contemplative look back at the bewitching blend of science and jest presented in "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Guide to Atmospheric Quirks" by A. Weatherman. Lo and behold, the statistical embrace between the popularity of Odalys and Prescott's environmental antics mirrors the fanciful insights presented, lending an air of unexpected validity to this peculiar correlation.

Now, let us not forget the sprightly tale woven by E. Novelista in "Pollen Perils: A Tale of Environmental Mysteries." Embracing the whimsical, we find credence in the playful twists and turns of our findings, akin to the spirited escapades chronicled in this literary ode to environmental curiosities.

As we romp through the fields of scientific wonder, our results kindle a delightful camaraderie with the comedic escapades of "Captain Planet and the Planeteers." The mirthful essence of these animated forays seems to have whispered secrets of statistical serendipity, infusing our findings with a mirthful lightness that dances in step with our research spirits.

Our statistical findings, with a correlation coefficient reminiscent of the joyful frolic of a determined yet whimsical unicorn, bolster the peculiar musings of previous scholars with a robust and unexpected allure. Verily, the connection between the popularity of Odalys and Prescott's atmospheric whimsies serves as an intriguing testament to the fanciful dance of statistical exploration and the whimsical tapestry of correlations and causations.

As we bask in the whimsical glow of statistical interrogation, reveling in the delightful concoction of merriment and intrigue, it is clear that our findings invite both scientific rigor and a dash of absurdity into the ever-curious realm of research. So, with sparkling eyes and a spring in our step, let us revel in the merry discourse of academic whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Odalys and Air pollution in Prescott, Arizona. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Odalys Odyssey: Airing out the Correlation Between Name Popularity and Air Pollution in Prescott"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to investigate the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Odalys and the levels of air pollution in the charming city of Prescott, Arizona. By utilizing data meticulously collected from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team sought to uncover any surprising connections between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through rigorous analysis, we uncovered a startling correlation coefficient of 0.8839906 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 1981 to 2020. Our findings offer a lighthearted yet thought-provoking glimpse into the potential influence of name trends on environmental conditions, inviting readers to ponder the whimsical side of statistical exploration. So, take a deep breath and join us in exploring the intriguing "Odalys Odyssey" through the whimsical lens of academic research.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Gather round, curious minds, as we embark on a peculiar expedition through the untamed wilderness of statistics and nomenclature. Picture it – the sun-dappled streets of Prescott, Arizona, where the scent of pine mingles playfully with the tang of scientific inquiry. Here, in this charming city, we encountered a conundrum so delightfully absurd it could only be found in the annals of academic whimsy. Our quest? To unravel the enigmatic correlation between the popularity of the first name Odalys and the wily dance of air pollutants.
As intrepid explorers armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and the stalwart Environmental Protection Agency, we traversed the peaks and valleys of statistical analysis in search of the unexpected. When our journey reached its climax, we uncovered a correlation coefficient so robust it would make even the most stoic of scientists raise an eyebrow in bemusement – a staggering 0.8839906! And to top it off, the significance level of p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1981 to 2020 removed any lingering doubt that this correlation was more than just a flight of fancy.
Now, let's pause for a moment and savor the sheer nonsensical joy of it all. Odalys, a name of mystery and intrigue, weaves its playful tendrils into the very fabric of Prescott's atmosphere. Could it be that this seemingly innocuous moniker exerts an unseen influence on the fluctuating levels of air pollutants? Could the whims of nomenclature be entangled in the tapestry of environmental conditions, painting a delightful picture of serendipity and statistical splendor?
Join us, dear readers, as we wend our merry way through this lighthearted romp of exploration. As we delve into the intersection of name trends and environmental phenomena, let us revel in the unexpected delights of "Odalys Odyssey." After all, what is science if not a delightful romp through the land of probabilities and puns, where correlations and causations frolic hand in hand? So fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a journey that will tickle your funny bone and dazzle your statistical sensibilities!

[[RESULTS]]
RESULTS
In the realm of whimsical statistics, our journey through the mysterious connection between the first name Odalys and the swirling winds of air pollution in Prescott, Arizona has yielded a confluence of astonishing findings. As we gazed at our scatterplot with the kind of bemused wonder usually reserved for discovering a unicorn, we found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8839906. This hearty statistical handshake suggests a robust relationship between the popularity of the name Odalys and the atmospheric capers of pollutants, leaving us to ponder the enigmatic dance of causation and correlation in the whimsical world of research.
The r-squared value of 0.7814394 serves as a whimsical waltz partner to our correlation coefficient, indicating that approximately 78.14% of the variation in air pollution levels can be explained by the popularity of the name Odalys. Oh, the delightful capriciousness of it all! The significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 1981 to 2020 adds an air of certainty to our findings, akin to stumbling upon a chest full of statistical treasures at the end of a rainbow.
Figure 1 depicts our scatterplot, a visual testament to the delightful dalliance between the popularity of Odalys and the ebb and flow of air pollution in Prescott. Behold the whimsical dance of data points as they twirl and cavort, painting a portrait of unexpected camaraderie between a name and the invisible tendrils of environmental conditions. It's a sight to behold, a serendipitous blend of statistical rigor and lighthearted marvel.
This journey through the Escher-like maze of statistical inquiry and unpredictable variables has left us with a hearty chuckle and a new appreciation for the playful side of research. Together, we have unraveled a charming curiosity and uncovered the potential influence of nomenclature on the whims of air pollutants. The results of our investigation stand as a testament to the delightfully off-kilter nature of statistical exploration, urging us to embrace the unexpected and revel in the whimsical tapestry of correlations and causations.
In our wide-eyed wanderings through the land of data, we have caught a glimpse of the peculiar tango between the first name Odalys and the mischievous antics of air pollution, inviting us to ponder the interplay between names and nature in this lighthearted romp of academic inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we draw the whimsical curtains on our delightful odyssey through the lighthearted realms of statistics and nomenclature, a palpable sense of playfulness lingers in the air, much like an enigmatic aroma wafting through a scientific wonderland. Our journey into the correlation between the popularity of the name Odalys and the dance of air pollutants in Prescott, Arizona has not only yielded robust findings but also sprinkled our path with statistical surprises and whimsical merriment.

The resounding correlation coefficient of 0.8839906, akin to stumbling upon a treasure trove of data puns, unquestionably underscores the spirited connection between Odalys and the capricious whims of air pollution. The r-squared value, a whimsical waltz partner to our correlation coefficient, takes center stage, encapsulating approximately 78.14% of the playful pirouettes of variation in air pollution levels – a truly enchanting statistical spectacle!

Now, let us not forget the scatterplot, a visual testament to the unexpected camaraderie between Odalys and the atmospheric capers of pollutants. Behold the whimsical dance of data points, a veritable masterpiece that nudges the boundaries of statistical exploration with a mischievous wink and a nod to the improbable.

As we bid adieu to our exuberant findings, we must acknowledge that, in the spirit of academic audacity, our exploration has illuminated the delightful interplay between the gossamer threads of nomenclature and the intangible tendrils of environmental conditions. Our research has not only unmasked a charming curiosity but also beckons us to revel in the whimsical tapestry of correlations and causations, where statistical rigor meets the playful serendipity of research.

In conclusion, our merry voyage has reached its jovial denouement, leaving us to cosset in the afterglow of our findings and bask in the delightfully peculiar nature of statistical exploration. With a skip in our step and a twinkle in our eye, we assert that no further research is needed in this sprightly domain of Odalys and air pollution. For in this whimsical odyssey, we have uncovered a statistical gem that twinkles with the whimsical charm of scientific inquiry and encapsulates the joy of improbable correlations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Odalys Odyssey: Airing out the Correlation Between Name Popularity and Air Pollution in Prescott. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Environmental Ergonomics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Odalys Odyssey: Airing out the Correlation Between Name Popularity and Air Pollution in Prescott. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for the Advancement of Comedic Environmental Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Odalys Odyssey: Airing out the Correlation Between Name Popularity and Air Pollution in Prescott with an abstract of In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey to investigate the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Odalys and the levels of air pollution in the charming city of Prescott, Arizona. By utilizing data meticulously collected from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, our research team sought to uncover any surprising connections between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Through rigorous analysis, we uncovered a startling correlation coefficient of 0.8839906 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 1981 to 2020. Our findings offer a lighthearted yet thought-provoking glimpse into the potential influence of name trends on environmental conditions, inviting readers to ponder the whimsical side of statistical exploration. So, take a deep breath and join us in exploring the intriguing "Odalys Odyssey" through the whimsical lens of academic research.

ChatGPT:

Odalys, name popularity, air pollution, Prescott, Arizona, correlation, US Social Security Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, statistical analysis, whimsical research, correlation coefficient, significance level, name trends, environmental conditions, statistical exploration

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Odalys
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Odalys
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Odalys

Air pollution in Prescott, Arizona
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Prescott, AZ
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Prescott, Arizona

Correlation r = 0.8839906 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7814394 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 78.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air pollution in Prescott, Arizona) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Odalys) over the 40 years from 1981 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.09E-14. 0.0000000000000408902519458159
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.88 in 4.09E-12% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 24,455,706,492,714 random variables You don't actually need 24 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 39 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 39 because we have two variables measured over a period of 40 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.79, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Popularity of the first name Odalys (Babies born)902213189141181011111831423221962342732222342351381071081176881947968454646385129373021
Air pollution in Prescott, Arizona (Bad air quality days)0.00349650.0070671400.00292398000000000000.1978610.08444440.1461190.1241130.0790960.04430380.11787100.04263570.0759494000.018633500.003802280.01234570.03180210.003472220.0214286000.01470590.0027397300.00302115




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([9,0,22,13,18,9,14,11,8,10,11,11,18,31,42,322,196,234,273,222,234,235,138,107,108,117,68,81,94,79,68,45,46,46,38,51,29,37,30,21,])
array_2 = np.array([0.0034965,0.00706714,0,0.00292398,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.197861,0.0844444,0.146119,0.124113,0.079096,0.0443038,0.117871,0,0.0426357,0.0759494,0,0,0.0186335,0,0.00380228,0.0123457,0.0318021,0.00347222,0.0214286,0,0,0.0147059,0.00273973,0,0.00302115,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Odalys"
array_2_name = "Air pollution in Prescott, Arizona"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 5306 · Black Variable ID: 3210 · Red Variable ID: 21581
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0