about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,300 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Cali and the second variable is Average views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Every time someone named Cali watched, it caused a ripple effect of Cali-bration, drawing in more viewers and ultimately boosting the average views. It's like they say, when it comes to boosting viewership, it's all about that Cali-ente factor!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a vibrant and bustling town square filled with diverse, animated characters. In the center, a large screen displays SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos, showcasing the average views climbing rapidly. Amid the crowd, a line of people named Cali, each holding a unique, eye-catching sign bearing their name, can be seen. As each Cali watches the videos, a palpable wave of excitement and energy ripples through the square, drawing in more and more viewers. The average views on the screen skyrocket, and the crowd erupts into applause, celebrating the undeniable Cali-bration effect on boosting viewership. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Cali and Average views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Low poly A photo-realistic image Steampunk Low poly Steampunk
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Cali and Average views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos, in the following situation: Every time someone named Cali watched, it caused a ripple effect of Cali-bration, drawing in more viewers and ultimately boosting the average views. It's like they say, when it comes to boosting viewership, it's all about that Cali-ente factor!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Picture a vibrant and bustling town square, where a large screen displays the average views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Among the crowd, there stands a line of people named Cali, each equipped with a unique, eye-catching sign bearing their name. As each Cali watches the videos, a wave of excitement and energy ripples through the square, drawing in more and more viewers. The average views on the screen skyrocket, and the crowd erupts into applause, celebrating the undeniable Cali-bration effect on boosting viewership.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: Picture a vibrant and bustling town square, where a large screen displays the average views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Among the crowd, there stands a line of people named Cali, each equipped with a unique, eye-catching sign bearing their name. As each Cali watches the videos, a wave of excitement and energy ripples through the square, drawing in more and more viewers. The average views on the screen skyrocket, and the crowd erupts into applause, celebrating the undeniable Cali-bration effect on boosting viewership. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a vibrant and bustling town square filled with diverse, animated characters. In the center, a large screen displays SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos, showcasing the average views climbing rapidly. Amid the crowd, a line of people named Cali, each holding a unique, eye-catching sign bearing their name, can be seen. As each Cali watches the videos, a palpable wave of excitement and energy ripples through the square, drawing in more and more viewers. The average views on the screen skyrocket, and the crowd erupts into applause, celebrating the undeniable Cali-bration effect on boosting viewership.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Popularity of the first name Cali positively influenced Average views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Cali Name Popularity and YouTube Video Views Neatly Interlace: A Statistical Analysis

Journal of Social Media and Cultural Trends

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cali and Average views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9006666 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Cali Name Popularity and YouTube Video Views Neatly Interlace: A Statistical Analysis

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Cali" and the mean number of views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we subjected the information to rigorous statistical scrutiny. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9006666 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2007 to 2022. This unexpected association prompts speculation on potential sociocultural influences and the constantly evolving dynamics of online content consumption. The findings elicit a chuckle and perhaps a raised eyebrow, yet they illuminate the curious intersections between nomenclature and digital viewership.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cali and Average views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cali Name Popularity and YouTube Video Views Neatly Interlace: A Statistical Analysis

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Cali" and the mean number of views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we subjected the information to rigorous statistical scrutiny. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9006666 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2007 to 2022. This unexpected association prompts speculation on potential sociocultural influences and the constantly evolving dynamics of online content consumption. The findings elicit a chuckle and perhaps a raised eyebrow, yet they illuminate the curious intersections between nomenclature and digital viewership.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The confluence of seemingly disparate variables is a perennial fascination in the realm of statistical inquiry. Among the vast and eclectic array of factors that could conceivably impact digital content consumption, the influence of personal nomenclature remains an underexplored and enigmatic terrain. In this vein, our investigation ventures into the peculiar relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Cali" and the average viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos, endeavoring to untangle the intricacies of this unexpected association.

The prospect of scrutinizing the connection between a name and online video viewership may initially elicit a quizzical expression or bemused skepticism. However, the empirical scrutiny of this ostensibly whimsical correlation yields an opportunity for scholarly mirth. The interplay between individual monikers and the allure of online content is rife with potential for puns and jests, as one is prompted to ponder whether there exists an inherent magnetism in the appellation "Cali." Perhaps it exerts a subtle yet undeniable pull on the digital denizens, compelling them to click and behold the intellectual offerings of the SmarterEveryDay channel.

As researchers, we cannot resist the temptation to eschew the mundane and delve into the unexpected, as the seemingly frivolous and the seemingly weighty can intertwine in the most delightful and confounding of manners. Thus, armed with statistical tools and a sense of scholarly whimsy, we embark on the exploration of this improbable but undeniably captivating association.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cali and Average views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cali Name Popularity and YouTube Video Views Neatly Interlace: A Statistical Analysis

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Cali" and the mean number of views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we subjected the information to rigorous statistical scrutiny. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9006666 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2007 to 2022. This unexpected association prompts speculation on potential sociocultural influences and the constantly evolving dynamics of online content consumption. The findings elicit a chuckle and perhaps a raised eyebrow, yet they illuminate the curious intersections between nomenclature and digital viewership.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The confluence of seemingly disparate variables is a perennial fascination in the realm of statistical inquiry. Among the vast and eclectic array of factors that could conceivably impact digital content consumption, the influence of personal nomenclature remains an underexplored and enigmatic terrain. In this vein, our investigation ventures into the peculiar relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Cali" and the average viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos, endeavoring to untangle the intricacies of this unexpected association.
The prospect of scrutinizing the connection between a name and online video viewership may initially elicit a quizzical expression or bemused skepticism. However, the empirical scrutiny of this ostensibly whimsical correlation yields an opportunity for scholarly mirth. The interplay between individual monikers and the allure of online content is rife with potential for puns and jests, as one is prompted to ponder whether there exists an inherent magnetism in the appellation "Cali." Perhaps it exerts a subtle yet undeniable pull on the digital denizens, compelling them to click and behold the intellectual offerings of the SmarterEveryDay channel.
As researchers, we cannot resist the temptation to eschew the mundane and delve into the unexpected, as the seemingly frivolous and the seemingly weighty can intertwine in the most delightful and confounding of manners. Thus, armed with statistical tools and a sense of scholarly whimsy, we embark on the exploration of this improbable but undeniably captivating association.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The exploration of the association between the prevalence of the first name “Cali” and the average viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos leads us to delve into a myriad of sources that may shed light on this curious connection. Existing studies on the impact of names on various social and cultural phenomena provide a foundation for understanding the potential influence of nomenclature on digital content consumption. Smith (2010) presents an analysis of the societal implications of personal names, highlighting the complex interplay between individual identity and broader sociocultural dynamics. Doe (2015) expands on this notion, exploring the psychological significance of names and their resonance in shaping interpersonal perceptions.

Jones (2018) extends this exploration to the realm of online behavior, examining the intriguing interrelationship between names and digital interactions. However, as we venture further into the literature, we encounter an unexpected divergence into realms that may seem unconventional, yet hold potential relevance to our investigation.

Books such as "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner and "Nudge" by Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein provide insight into the intricate forces that underlie human decision-making, offering a lens through which we may scrutinize the whimsical correlation under investigation. However, it is the realms of fiction and popular culture that unexpectedly reveal parallels to our study.

Works of fiction such as "Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss and "The Name of the Rose" by Umberto Eco, though seemingly unrelated at first glance, prompt contemplation on the subtle influence of nomenclature in shaping intrigue and fascination. Furthermore, as our investigation takes an unexpectedly whimsical turn, we turn to children’s television shows and cartoons that have inexplicably ingrained themselves in our consciousness. The likes of "SpongeBob SquarePants" and "Dora the Explorer" beckon our attention, their playful spirit mirroring the lighthearted yet intriguing nature of our research inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cali and Average views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and YouTube . You used data from 2007 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cali Name Popularity and YouTube Video Views Neatly Interlace: A Statistical Analysis

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Cali" and the mean number of views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we subjected the information to rigorous statistical scrutiny. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9006666 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2007 to 2022. This unexpected association prompts speculation on potential sociocultural influences and the constantly evolving dynamics of online content consumption. The findings elicit a chuckle and perhaps a raised eyebrow, yet they illuminate the curious intersections between nomenclature and digital viewership.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The confluence of seemingly disparate variables is a perennial fascination in the realm of statistical inquiry. Among the vast and eclectic array of factors that could conceivably impact digital content consumption, the influence of personal nomenclature remains an underexplored and enigmatic terrain. In this vein, our investigation ventures into the peculiar relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Cali" and the average viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos, endeavoring to untangle the intricacies of this unexpected association.
The prospect of scrutinizing the connection between a name and online video viewership may initially elicit a quizzical expression or bemused skepticism. However, the empirical scrutiny of this ostensibly whimsical correlation yields an opportunity for scholarly mirth. The interplay between individual monikers and the allure of online content is rife with potential for puns and jests, as one is prompted to ponder whether there exists an inherent magnetism in the appellation "Cali." Perhaps it exerts a subtle yet undeniable pull on the digital denizens, compelling them to click and behold the intellectual offerings of the SmarterEveryDay channel.
As researchers, we cannot resist the temptation to eschew the mundane and delve into the unexpected, as the seemingly frivolous and the seemingly weighty can intertwine in the most delightful and confounding of manners. Thus, armed with statistical tools and a sense of scholarly whimsy, we embark on the exploration of this improbable but undeniably captivating association.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The present study adopts a retrospective correlational design, analyzing archival data to navigate the intricate nexus between the prevalence of the name "Cali" and the mean viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. The primary data sources employed encompass records from the US Social Security Administration for the name "Cali" and metrics from the YouTube platform for the aforementioned video content. The period under scrutiny spans from 2007 to 2022, offering a substantial temporal scope for identifying any enduring patterns in the data.

The initial step in the methodological odyssey entailed wrangling the voluminous databases available from the US Social Security Administration, which catalog the occurrences of the name "Cali" over the specified timeframe. Efforts to extract the requisite data were akin to prospecting for rare minerals, as the abundance of monikers demanded judicious filtration to procure a representative sample for analysis. This endeavor was supplemented by a thorough spell of data scrubbing, excluding any anomalous entries that may have infiltrated the records, much like sieving grains of wheat to separate the chaff.

On a parallel course, the researchers ventured into the expansive universe of YouTube metrics, navigating the labyrinthine repositories of SmarterEveryDay's catalog of videos. The aim was to compile a comprehensive dataset of average viewership figures for each video, akin to mapping the terrain of a sprawling metropolis. Intuitive selection criteria were employed to identify a cohort of videos for analysis, relying on a blend of popularity and relevance to ensure the judicious representation of the channel's content mosaic.

With data at hand, the statistical fraternity of tools was summoned to the fore, with correlation analysis serving as the crux of the investigative process. Pearson's correlation coefficient was the instrument of choice to illuminate the degree of association between the prevalence of the name "Cali" and the mean viewership of SmarterEveryDay videos. The calculation of this metric unfolded akin to an intricate dance between the variables, probing the depths of their mutual affinity while entertaining the statistical sensibilities.

To supplement the interplay of variables, a p-value was invoked to ascertain the statistical significance of the observed correlation. The quest for significance unfolded as a voyage into uncharted waters, beckoning the discerning eye to discern the elusive threshold of statistical significance amidst a sea of numerical permutations.

The synergy of datasets from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, coupled with the judicious application of statistical tools, congealed to yield a rich tapestry of evidence. This confluence of empirical components provided a panoramic vista for the exploration of the intriguing nexus between the name "Cali" and the viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos, unveiling a correlation of unforeseen magnitude and prompting ruminations on the whimsical capriciousness of digital engagement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cali and Average views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and YouTube .

For the time period 2007 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9006666, r-squared of 0.8112003, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cali Name Popularity and YouTube Video Views Neatly Interlace: A Statistical Analysis

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Cali" and the mean number of views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we subjected the information to rigorous statistical scrutiny. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9006666 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2007 to 2022. This unexpected association prompts speculation on potential sociocultural influences and the constantly evolving dynamics of online content consumption. The findings elicit a chuckle and perhaps a raised eyebrow, yet they illuminate the curious intersections between nomenclature and digital viewership.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The confluence of seemingly disparate variables is a perennial fascination in the realm of statistical inquiry. Among the vast and eclectic array of factors that could conceivably impact digital content consumption, the influence of personal nomenclature remains an underexplored and enigmatic terrain. In this vein, our investigation ventures into the peculiar relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Cali" and the average viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos, endeavoring to untangle the intricacies of this unexpected association.
The prospect of scrutinizing the connection between a name and online video viewership may initially elicit a quizzical expression or bemused skepticism. However, the empirical scrutiny of this ostensibly whimsical correlation yields an opportunity for scholarly mirth. The interplay between individual monikers and the allure of online content is rife with potential for puns and jests, as one is prompted to ponder whether there exists an inherent magnetism in the appellation "Cali." Perhaps it exerts a subtle yet undeniable pull on the digital denizens, compelling them to click and behold the intellectual offerings of the SmarterEveryDay channel.
As researchers, we cannot resist the temptation to eschew the mundane and delve into the unexpected, as the seemingly frivolous and the seemingly weighty can intertwine in the most delightful and confounding of manners. Thus, armed with statistical tools and a sense of scholarly whimsy, we embark on the exploration of this improbable but undeniably captivating association.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis conducted on the relationship between the frequency of the first name "Cali" and the mean viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos for the years 2007 to 2022 revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9006666. This coefficient, denoting an exceptionally strong positive relationship, suggests a noteworthy concordance between the two variables.

Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was computed at 0.8112003, indicating that approximately 81.12% of the variability in the average video views can be accounted for by the variability in the prevalence of the name "Cali." This substantial r-squared value underscores the substantial degree of variability shared by these seemingly dissimilar variables.

The p-value, which was determined to be less than 0.01, provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no relationship between these variables. This indicates a high level of statistical significance and reinforces the credibility of the observed association between the popularity of the name "Cali" and the average viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos.

The visual representation of the data in the form of a scatterplot (Fig. 1) unequivocally illustrates the formidable correlation between the prevalence of the name "Cali" and the mean viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos, further corroborating the statistical findings.

In summation, the statistical evidence overwhelmingly attests to the noteworthy and unexpected intertwining of the prevalence of the first name "Cali" and the viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube content. These findings invite a lighthearted contemplation of the enigmatic allure of nomenclature in the digital realm, prompting the acknowledgment of the delightful and often confounding nature of statistical inquiry.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cali and Average views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Cali Name Popularity and YouTube Video Views Neatly Interlace: A Statistical Analysis

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Cali" and the mean number of views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we subjected the information to rigorous statistical scrutiny. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9006666 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2007 to 2022. This unexpected association prompts speculation on potential sociocultural influences and the constantly evolving dynamics of online content consumption. The findings elicit a chuckle and perhaps a raised eyebrow, yet they illuminate the curious intersections between nomenclature and digital viewership.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The exploration of the association between the prevalence of the first name “Cali” and the average viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos leads us to delve into a myriad of sources that may shed light on this curious connection. Existing studies on the impact of names on various social and cultural phenomena provide a foundation for understanding the potential influence of nomenclature on digital content consumption. Smith (2010) presents an analysis of the societal implications of personal names, highlighting the complex interplay between individual identity and broader sociocultural dynamics. Doe (2015) expands on this notion, exploring the psychological significance of names and their resonance in shaping interpersonal perceptions.
Jones (2018) extends this exploration to the realm of online behavior, examining the intriguing interrelationship between names and digital interactions. However, as we venture further into the literature, we encounter an unexpected divergence into realms that may seem unconventional, yet hold potential relevance to our investigation.
Books such as "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner and "Nudge" by Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein provide insight into the intricate forces that underlie human decision-making, offering a lens through which we may scrutinize the whimsical correlation under investigation. However, it is the realms of fiction and popular culture that unexpectedly reveal parallels to our study.
Works of fiction such as "Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss and "The Name of the Rose" by Umberto Eco, though seemingly unrelated at first glance, prompt contemplation on the subtle influence of nomenclature in shaping intrigue and fascination. Furthermore, as our investigation takes an unexpectedly whimsical turn, we turn to children’s television shows and cartoons that have inexplicably ingrained themselves in our consciousness. The likes of "SpongeBob SquarePants" and "Dora the Explorer" beckon our attention, their playful spirit mirroring the lighthearted yet intriguing nature of our research inquiry.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis conducted on the relationship between the frequency of the first name "Cali" and the mean viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos for the years 2007 to 2022 revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9006666. This coefficient, denoting an exceptionally strong positive relationship, suggests a noteworthy concordance between the two variables.
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was computed at 0.8112003, indicating that approximately 81.12% of the variability in the average video views can be accounted for by the variability in the prevalence of the name "Cali." This substantial r-squared value underscores the substantial degree of variability shared by these seemingly dissimilar variables.
The p-value, which was determined to be less than 0.01, provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no relationship between these variables. This indicates a high level of statistical significance and reinforces the credibility of the observed association between the popularity of the name "Cali" and the average viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos.
The visual representation of the data in the form of a scatterplot (Fig. 1) unequivocally illustrates the formidable correlation between the prevalence of the name "Cali" and the mean viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos, further corroborating the statistical findings.
In summation, the statistical evidence overwhelmingly attests to the noteworthy and unexpected intertwining of the prevalence of the first name "Cali" and the viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube content. These findings invite a lighthearted contemplation of the enigmatic allure of nomenclature in the digital realm, prompting the acknowledgment of the delightful and often confounding nature of statistical inquiry.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of this study provide remarkable support for the previously proposed notion of an intricate interplay between the prevalence of the first name "Cali" and the average viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Our findings align with prior research that has delved into the societal and psychological implications of nomenclature, reaffirming the potential influence of names on digital content consumption. Smith's (2010) analysis of the complex interplay between individual identity and broader sociocultural dynamics takes on a new dimension as we contemplate the resonance of the name "Cali" in shaping online viewership behaviors.

The unexpectedly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9006666 attests to the robustness of the relationship between the frequency of the name "Cali" and the mean viewership of SmarterEveryDay's videos. This significant finding mirrors the whimsical and often confounding nature of statistical inquiry, prompting wry smiles in contemplating the enigmatic allure of nomenclature in the digital realm.

The substantial r-squared value of 0.8112003 further underscores the remarkable degree to which the variability in the average video views can be accounted for by the prevalence of the name "Cali." This statistical nugget provokes a small chuckle at the unexpected intertwining of these seemingly dissimilar variables, as one ponder's the delightful nature of statistical analysis.

The p-value of less than 0.01 offers compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no relationship between these variables, reinforcing the credibility of the observed association between the popularity of the name "Cali" and the average viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. It stands as a gentle reminder of the enduring surprises that statistical analysis can unveil.

Furthermore, when observing the visual representation of the data in the form of a scatterplot, one cannot help but appreciate the unequivocal illustration of the formidable correlation between the prevalence of the name "Cali" and the mean viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos.

In conclusion, these findings not only bolster the existing body of knowledge on the influence of names on social and digital behavior but also provide a light-hearted reminder of the whimsical and often unexpected nature of statistical inquiry. This study offers a gentle invitation to embrace the delightful quirkiness that statistical analysis can reveal, underscoring the joy and intrigue that underlie research endeavors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cali and Average views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Cali Name Popularity and YouTube Video Views Neatly Interlace: A Statistical Analysis

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Cali" and the mean number of views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we subjected the information to rigorous statistical scrutiny. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9006666 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2007 to 2022. This unexpected association prompts speculation on potential sociocultural influences and the constantly evolving dynamics of online content consumption. The findings elicit a chuckle and perhaps a raised eyebrow, yet they illuminate the curious intersections between nomenclature and digital viewership.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The confluence of seemingly disparate variables is a perennial fascination in the realm of statistical inquiry. Among the vast and eclectic array of factors that could conceivably impact digital content consumption, the influence of personal nomenclature remains an underexplored and enigmatic terrain. In this vein, our investigation ventures into the peculiar relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Cali" and the average viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos, endeavoring to untangle the intricacies of this unexpected association.
The prospect of scrutinizing the connection between a name and online video viewership may initially elicit a quizzical expression or bemused skepticism. However, the empirical scrutiny of this ostensibly whimsical correlation yields an opportunity for scholarly mirth. The interplay between individual monikers and the allure of online content is rife with potential for puns and jests, as one is prompted to ponder whether there exists an inherent magnetism in the appellation "Cali." Perhaps it exerts a subtle yet undeniable pull on the digital denizens, compelling them to click and behold the intellectual offerings of the SmarterEveryDay channel.
As researchers, we cannot resist the temptation to eschew the mundane and delve into the unexpected, as the seemingly frivolous and the seemingly weighty can intertwine in the most delightful and confounding of manners. Thus, armed with statistical tools and a sense of scholarly whimsy, we embark on the exploration of this improbable but undeniably captivating association.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis conducted on the relationship between the frequency of the first name "Cali" and the mean viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos for the years 2007 to 2022 revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9006666. This coefficient, denoting an exceptionally strong positive relationship, suggests a noteworthy concordance between the two variables.
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was computed at 0.8112003, indicating that approximately 81.12% of the variability in the average video views can be accounted for by the variability in the prevalence of the name "Cali." This substantial r-squared value underscores the substantial degree of variability shared by these seemingly dissimilar variables.
The p-value, which was determined to be less than 0.01, provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no relationship between these variables. This indicates a high level of statistical significance and reinforces the credibility of the observed association between the popularity of the name "Cali" and the average viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos.
The visual representation of the data in the form of a scatterplot (Fig. 1) unequivocally illustrates the formidable correlation between the prevalence of the name "Cali" and the mean viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos, further corroborating the statistical findings.
In summation, the statistical evidence overwhelmingly attests to the noteworthy and unexpected intertwining of the prevalence of the first name "Cali" and the viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube content. These findings invite a lighthearted contemplation of the enigmatic allure of nomenclature in the digital realm, prompting the acknowledgment of the delightful and often confounding nature of statistical inquiry.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In light of the remarkably robust correlation coefficient and the compelling statistical significance, the findings of this study cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance or statistical fluke. The distinctly strong positive relationship between the frequency of the first name "Cali" and the mean viewership of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos indeed piques scholarly curiosity and beckons a wry smile. It may be tempting to ponder whether the name "Cali" bears an ineffable charm that captivates digital denizens and leads them to partake in the intellectual offerings of the SmarterEveryDay channel. However, it is paramount to approach such suppositions with due caution, mindful of the inherently quirky and capricious nature of statistical associations.

The curiously high coefficient of determination underscores the substantial variability shared by these seemingly disparate variables, eliciting a chuckle at the whims of statistical caprice. While the p-value emphatically rejects the null hypothesis, rendering the observed correlation undeniably noteworthy, one cannot help but marvel at the capricious confluence of nomenclature and digital viewership.

As researchers, we are compelled to acknowledge the delightful and often confounding nature of statistical inquiry, wherein seemingly whimsical variables intertwine with an unexpected and undeniable grace. In the grand symphony of research, the association between the name "Cali" and the viewership of SmarterEveryDay content adds a whimsical note that cannot be ignored. Nevertheless, we assert, with the confidence of statistical rigor and the levity of scholarly whimsy, that further research in this area may not be necessary.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Cali Name Popularity and YouTube Video Views Neatly Interlace: A Statistical Analysis. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Social Media and Cultural Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Cali Name Popularity and YouTube Video Views Neatly Interlace: A Statistical Analysis. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Internet Culture and Demographic Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Cali Name Popularity and YouTube Video Views Neatly Interlace: A Statistical Analysis with an abstract of This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the prevalence of the first name "Cali" and the mean number of views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and YouTube, we subjected the information to rigorous statistical scrutiny. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9006666 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2007 to 2022. This unexpected association prompts speculation on potential sociocultural influences and the constantly evolving dynamics of online content consumption. The findings elicit a chuckle and perhaps a raised eyebrow, yet they illuminate the curious intersections between nomenclature and digital viewership.

ChatGPT:

"Cali" first name popularity, YouTube video views, statistical analysis, social security administration data, online content consumption, digital viewership, SmarterEveryDay, Cali name prevalence, sociocultural influences, nomenclature dynamics, statistical scrutiny, correlation coefficient, p-value, YouTube data analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Cali
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Cali
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Cali

Average views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Average views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos.
Source: SmarterEveryDay on YouTube
Additional Info: Current total views of videos released that year.

See what else correlates with Average views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9006666 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8112003 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Average views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Cali) over the 16 years from 2007 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.0E-6. 0.0000019608455792531480000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 0.0002% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 509,984 random variables You don't actually need 509 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.73, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Cali (Babies born)66473973976582695411441685146712301152122212481137990865
Average views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos (Average views)55995.127879559514.933199191633311155703332280836824056479804246570356081044265304756800747409037809502744320




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
  5. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([664,739,739,765,826,954,1144,1685,1467,1230,1152,1222,1248,1137,990,865,])
array_2 = np.array([55995.1,278795,59514.9,331991,916333,1115570,3332280,8368240,5647980,4246570,3560810,4426530,4756800,7474090,3780950,2744320,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Cali"
array_2_name = "Average views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 5300 · Black Variable ID: 3859 · Red Variable ID: 25490
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0