about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,265 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Average views of Vihart's YouTube videos and the second variable is The number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan.  The chart goes from 2010 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the average views of Vihart's videos dropped, so did the interest in geometric and mathematical concepts. This led to a decline in the demand for executive administrative assistants who were no longer needed to handle the sudden lack of 'parallelogram management' and 'cosine coordination' in Michigan. It seems like the 'reduction in views' truly trigonometry a chain reaction of job cuts for these assistants!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that visually represents the sharp decline in demand for geometric and mathematical concepts and its impact on executive administrative assistants in Michigan. The image should showcase two line graphs – one representing the decreasing view count of Vihart's YouTube videos, and the other depicting the decline in the number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. As the graphs converge, it should illustrate the direct correlation between the reduction in views and the decreasing demand for executive administrative assistants. The visual should not include any words or speech bubbles, maintaining simplicity while effectively conveying the message. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Average views of Vihart's YouTube videos and The number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a funny image macro Data cyber art A Discovery magazine cover image A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Average views of Vihart's YouTube videos and The number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan, in the following situation: As the average views of Vihart's videos dropped, so did the interest in geometric and mathematical concepts. This led to a decline in the demand for executive administrative assistants who were no longer needed to handle the sudden lack of 'parallelogram management' and 'cosine coordination' in Michigan. It seems like the 'reduction in views' truly trigonometry a chain reaction of job cuts for these assistants!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: The view count bar graph for Vihart's YouTube videos declined sharply, mirroring the fall in demand for geometric and mathematical concepts. In Michigan, a line graph showed a steep drop in the number of executive administrative assistants, reflecting the reduced need for "parallelogram management" and "cosine coordination". Both graphs converged, indicating a direct correlation between the reduction in views and the decreasing demand for executive administrative assistants in Michigan.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: The view count bar graph for Vihart's YouTube videos declined sharply, mirroring the fall in demand for geometric and mathematical concepts. In Michigan, a line graph showed a steep drop in the number of executive administrative assistants, reflecting the reduced need for "parallelogram management" and "cosine coordination". Both graphs converged, indicating a direct correlation between the reduction in views and the decreasing demand for executive administrative assistants in Michigan. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that visually represents the sharp decline in demand for geometric and mathematical concepts and its impact on executive administrative assistants in Michigan. The image should showcase two line graphs – one representing the decreasing view count of Vihart's YouTube videos, and the other depicting the decline in the number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. As the graphs converge, it should illustrate the direct correlation between the reduction in views and the decreasing demand for executive administrative assistants. The visual should not include any words or speech bubbles, maintaining simplicity while effectively conveying the message.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Average views of Vihart YouTube videos caused The number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Vi-hart of Administrative Assistance: Exploring the Correlation between YouTube Views and Secretary Stats

The Journal of Quirky Analytics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Vihart YouTube videos and The number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from YouTube and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9429608 and p < 0.01 for 2010 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Vi-hart of Administrative Assistance: Exploring the Correlation between YouTube Views and Secretary Stats"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the hitherto unexplored connection between the average views of ViHart's innovative YouTube videos and the number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. By utilizing data from YouTube and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our study has revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9429608 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2010 to 2022. Through a series of intricate statistical analyses, we have uncovered an intriguing relationship that defies conventional wisdom. Our findings not only shed light on the impact of online creativity on labor trends but also provide a refreshing twist on the oftentimes mundane world of administrative support.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Vihart YouTube videos and The number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Vi-hart of Administrative Assistance: Exploring the Correlation between YouTube Views and Secretary Stats"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the hitherto unexplored connection between the average views of ViHart's innovative YouTube videos and the number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. By utilizing data from YouTube and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our study has revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9429608 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2010 to 2022. Through a series of intricate statistical analyses, we have uncovered an intriguing relationship that defies conventional wisdom. Our findings not only shed light on the impact of online creativity on labor trends but also provide a refreshing twist on the oftentimes mundane world of administrative support.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

In the realm of academic research, there are often unexpected correlations that leave scholars raising their eyebrows, scratching their heads, and whispering, "Well, I'll be a monkey's uncle." Such is the case with our latest investigation, which seeks to unravel the enigmatic relationship between ViHart's captivating YouTube videos and the number of executive administrative assistants in the fine state of Michigan.

While one might initially assume that these two entities exist in entirely separate spheres – one in the colorful, pixelated universe of online entertainment, the other in the bustling halls of bureaucratic efficiency – our data has defied expectations and thrown a curveball that would make even the most seasoned baseball pitcher go, "Hey, that's unexpected!"

The aim of this paper is not just to present you with a collection of facts and figures, but to take you on a rollercoaster ride through the often-uncharted terrain of statistical peculiarity. We implore you to fasten your seatbelts, keep your arms and legs inside the vehicle at all times, and prepare to be both entertained and enlightened by the unexpected correlations that lie ahead.

But enough with the foreplay – let's dive into the heart of the matter, where we shall unravel the Vi-hart of administrative assistance!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Vihart YouTube videos and The number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Vi-hart of Administrative Assistance: Exploring the Correlation between YouTube Views and Secretary Stats"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the hitherto unexplored connection between the average views of ViHart's innovative YouTube videos and the number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. By utilizing data from YouTube and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our study has revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9429608 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2010 to 2022. Through a series of intricate statistical analyses, we have uncovered an intriguing relationship that defies conventional wisdom. Our findings not only shed light on the impact of online creativity on labor trends but also provide a refreshing twist on the oftentimes mundane world of administrative support.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
In the realm of academic research, there are often unexpected correlations that leave scholars raising their eyebrows, scratching their heads, and whispering, "Well, I'll be a monkey's uncle." Such is the case with our latest investigation, which seeks to unravel the enigmatic relationship between ViHart's captivating YouTube videos and the number of executive administrative assistants in the fine state of Michigan.
While one might initially assume that these two entities exist in entirely separate spheres – one in the colorful, pixelated universe of online entertainment, the other in the bustling halls of bureaucratic efficiency – our data has defied expectations and thrown a curveball that would make even the most seasoned baseball pitcher go, "Hey, that's unexpected!"
The aim of this paper is not just to present you with a collection of facts and figures, but to take you on a rollercoaster ride through the often-uncharted terrain of statistical peculiarity. We implore you to fasten your seatbelts, keep your arms and legs inside the vehicle at all times, and prepare to be both entertained and enlightened by the unexpected correlations that lie ahead.
But enough with the foreplay – let's dive into the heart of the matter, where we shall unravel the Vi-hart of administrative assistance!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith (2015) delves into the intricacies of YouTube viewership patterns, examining the factors that contribute to the popularity of online content creators. Doe (2017) provides a comprehensive analysis of the administrative support industry in Michigan, offering insights into the evolving roles of executive assistants in the modern workplace. Jones (2018) explores the psychological impact of engaging with online educational videos, shedding light on the cognitive processes involved in consuming digital media.

Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Power of Creativity in the Digital Age" by Alexander Brown (2019) uncovers the influence of online creativity on professional spheres, while "The Evolution of Administrative Support" by Emma White (2020) offers a historical perspective on the changing landscape of administrative roles.

Venturing into the realm of fiction, "The Secret Diary of a YouTube Star" by Lily Green (2018) and "The Executive Assistant's Dilemma" by Max Silver (2021) provide imaginative narratives that, while not grounded in reality, offer intriguing glimpses into the intersection of online content and administrative duties.

Additionally, social media posts such as @CreativeAdminLife and @YouTubeViewsGalore have sparked intriguing discussions surrounding the unexpected link between ViHart's videos and the administrative support workforce. These digital musings have piqued the curiosity of online communities, prompting lively debates and a flurry of meme-worthy content that showcases the quirky alignment of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

As we delve into the depths of this uncharted territory, it becomes abundantly clear that the connection between ViHart's YouTube stardom and the intricacies of executive administrative support is a subject that not only challenges conventional wisdom but also tickles the funny bone of statistical absurdity.

In the next section, we will unpack the methodological approach that allowed us to harness this tantalizing statistical correlation and explore the implications of our eyebrow-raising findings.

Stay tuned, folks – the plot thickens!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Vihart YouTube videos and The number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2010 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Vi-hart of Administrative Assistance: Exploring the Correlation between YouTube Views and Secretary Stats"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the hitherto unexplored connection between the average views of ViHart's innovative YouTube videos and the number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. By utilizing data from YouTube and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our study has revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9429608 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2010 to 2022. Through a series of intricate statistical analyses, we have uncovered an intriguing relationship that defies conventional wisdom. Our findings not only shed light on the impact of online creativity on labor trends but also provide a refreshing twist on the oftentimes mundane world of administrative support.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
In the realm of academic research, there are often unexpected correlations that leave scholars raising their eyebrows, scratching their heads, and whispering, "Well, I'll be a monkey's uncle." Such is the case with our latest investigation, which seeks to unravel the enigmatic relationship between ViHart's captivating YouTube videos and the number of executive administrative assistants in the fine state of Michigan.
While one might initially assume that these two entities exist in entirely separate spheres – one in the colorful, pixelated universe of online entertainment, the other in the bustling halls of bureaucratic efficiency – our data has defied expectations and thrown a curveball that would make even the most seasoned baseball pitcher go, "Hey, that's unexpected!"
The aim of this paper is not just to present you with a collection of facts and figures, but to take you on a rollercoaster ride through the often-uncharted terrain of statistical peculiarity. We implore you to fasten your seatbelts, keep your arms and legs inside the vehicle at all times, and prepare to be both entertained and enlightened by the unexpected correlations that lie ahead.
But enough with the foreplay – let's dive into the heart of the matter, where we shall unravel the Vi-hart of administrative assistance!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

To unravel the mysteries surrounding the Vi-hart of administrative assistance, our research team embarked on a quest for data that would make even the most intrepid explorer break out in a cold sweat. Our first stop was the vast landscape of YouTube, where ViHart's videos captivate audiences with mathemagical musings and artistic algorithmic adventures. We meticulously collected data on the average views of ViHart's videos from 2010 to 2022, ensuring that no pixel went uncounted and no algorithmic algorithm was left unanalyzed.

Now, to venture into the bustling world of administrative assistance, we navigated our way to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, where the diligent digits of labor data awaited our perusal. With precision and panache, we extracted information on the number of executive administrative assistants in the state of Michigan, paying homage to the unsung heroes of paperwork and phone calls.

The meeting of these two seemingly disparate realms – the ethereal allure of YouTube views and the no-nonsense realm of administrative support – was indeed a match made in statistical heaven. With data in hand, we employed a series of statistical analyses, including Pearson's correlation coefficient and regression modeling, to unveil the hidden threads that bind these two worlds together.

As we delved into our analyses, we carefully considered potential confounding variables, such as changes in internet usage patterns, economic fluctuations, and the occasional viral video that sweeps through cyberspace like a digital tornado. Our statistical wizardry ultimately led us to a correlation coefficient of 0.9429608, emphasizing the robustness of the relationship, and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association.

It is important to note that our approach was not without its thrills and spills. We encountered formidable challenges, such as resisting the siren call of YouTube distractions and resisting the urge to organize the office supplies in the Bureau of Labor Statistics. However, through sheer determination and an ample supply of caffeinated beverages, we emerged victorious, armed with a treasure trove of data that has illuminated the unexpected connection between ViHart's YouTube prowess and the world of executive administrative assistance.

In conclusion, our methodology harnessed the power of statistical sorcery and digital dexterity to unlock the symbiotic relationship between online creativity and administrative support. Our findings, though whimsical in nature, stand as a testament to the unpredictable nature of data and the potential for delightful discoveries in the most unassuming places.

Stay tuned for the enthralling results in the upcoming sections, where we shall unravel the compelling tale of the Vi-hart of administrative assistance!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Vihart YouTube videos and The number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2010 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9429608, r-squared of 0.8891750, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Vi-hart of Administrative Assistance: Exploring the Correlation between YouTube Views and Secretary Stats"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the hitherto unexplored connection between the average views of ViHart's innovative YouTube videos and the number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. By utilizing data from YouTube and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our study has revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9429608 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2010 to 2022. Through a series of intricate statistical analyses, we have uncovered an intriguing relationship that defies conventional wisdom. Our findings not only shed light on the impact of online creativity on labor trends but also provide a refreshing twist on the oftentimes mundane world of administrative support.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
In the realm of academic research, there are often unexpected correlations that leave scholars raising their eyebrows, scratching their heads, and whispering, "Well, I'll be a monkey's uncle." Such is the case with our latest investigation, which seeks to unravel the enigmatic relationship between ViHart's captivating YouTube videos and the number of executive administrative assistants in the fine state of Michigan.
While one might initially assume that these two entities exist in entirely separate spheres – one in the colorful, pixelated universe of online entertainment, the other in the bustling halls of bureaucratic efficiency – our data has defied expectations and thrown a curveball that would make even the most seasoned baseball pitcher go, "Hey, that's unexpected!"
The aim of this paper is not just to present you with a collection of facts and figures, but to take you on a rollercoaster ride through the often-uncharted terrain of statistical peculiarity. We implore you to fasten your seatbelts, keep your arms and legs inside the vehicle at all times, and prepare to be both entertained and enlightened by the unexpected correlations that lie ahead.
But enough with the foreplay – let's dive into the heart of the matter, where we shall unravel the Vi-hart of administrative assistance!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

**RESULTS**

Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation between the average views of ViHart's YouTube videos and the number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9429608, indicating a highly positive relationship between these two variables. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8891750 suggests that approximately 88.92% of the variation in the number of executive administrative assistants can be explained by the average views of ViHart's YouTube videos. The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that this relationship is statistically significant.

**Figure 1.** The scatterplot in Figure 1 demonstrates the striking correlation between the average views of ViHart's YouTube videos and the number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. The data points form a tight cluster, illustrating the strong positive relationship between the variables.

The robustness and consistency of these results suggest that there is indeed a meaningful connection between the captivating content of ViHart's videos and the demand for administrative support in Michigan.

That being said, while our statistical analysis has yielded compelling results, it is crucial to interpret these findings within a broader context and exercise caution in drawing overly simplistic conclusions. Despite the undeniable correlation, the causative mechanisms underlying this relationship remain unclear and warrant further investigation. It is worth noting that correlation does not imply causation, and additional research is needed to explore the underlying factors driving this intriguing association.

Nonetheless, our study offers a captivating glimpse into the uncharted territory of statistical relationships, demonstrating that even the most seemingly disparate entities may be connected in ways that defy conventional wisdom. We invite fellow scholars to join us on this whimsical journey of discovery, where the Vi-hart of administrative assistance takes center stage, challenging our preconceived notions and providing a delightful twist to the landscape of labor trends.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Vihart YouTube videos and The number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Vi-hart of Administrative Assistance: Exploring the Correlation between YouTube Views and Secretary Stats"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the hitherto unexplored connection between the average views of ViHart's innovative YouTube videos and the number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. By utilizing data from YouTube and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our study has revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9429608 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2010 to 2022. Through a series of intricate statistical analyses, we have uncovered an intriguing relationship that defies conventional wisdom. Our findings not only shed light on the impact of online creativity on labor trends but also provide a refreshing twist on the oftentimes mundane world of administrative support.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith (2015) delves into the intricacies of YouTube viewership patterns, examining the factors that contribute to the popularity of online content creators. Doe (2017) provides a comprehensive analysis of the administrative support industry in Michigan, offering insights into the evolving roles of executive assistants in the modern workplace. Jones (2018) explores the psychological impact of engaging with online educational videos, shedding light on the cognitive processes involved in consuming digital media.
Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Power of Creativity in the Digital Age" by Alexander Brown (2019) uncovers the influence of online creativity on professional spheres, while "The Evolution of Administrative Support" by Emma White (2020) offers a historical perspective on the changing landscape of administrative roles.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, "The Secret Diary of a YouTube Star" by Lily Green (2018) and "The Executive Assistant's Dilemma" by Max Silver (2021) provide imaginative narratives that, while not grounded in reality, offer intriguing glimpses into the intersection of online content and administrative duties.
Additionally, social media posts such as @CreativeAdminLife and @YouTubeViewsGalore have sparked intriguing discussions surrounding the unexpected link between ViHart's videos and the administrative support workforce. These digital musings have piqued the curiosity of online communities, prompting lively debates and a flurry of meme-worthy content that showcases the quirky alignment of seemingly unrelated phenomena.
As we delve into the depths of this uncharted territory, it becomes abundantly clear that the connection between ViHart's YouTube stardom and the intricacies of executive administrative support is a subject that not only challenges conventional wisdom but also tickles the funny bone of statistical absurdity.
In the next section, we will unpack the methodological approach that allowed us to harness this tantalizing statistical correlation and explore the implications of our eyebrow-raising findings.
Stay tuned, folks – the plot thickens!

[[RESULTS]]
Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation between the average views of ViHart's YouTube videos and the number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9429608, indicating a highly positive relationship between these two variables. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8891750 suggests that approximately 88.92% of the variation in the number of executive administrative assistants can be explained by the average views of ViHart's YouTube videos. The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that this relationship is statistically significant.
The scatterplot in Figure 1 demonstrates the striking correlation between the average views of ViHart's YouTube videos and the number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. The data points form a tight cluster, illustrating the strong positive relationship between the variables.
The robustness and consistency of these results suggest that there is indeed a meaningful connection between the captivating content of ViHart's videos and the demand for administrative support in Michigan.
That being said, while our statistical analysis has yielded compelling results, it is crucial to interpret these findings within a broader context and exercise caution in drawing overly simplistic conclusions. Despite the undeniable correlation, the causative mechanisms underlying this relationship remain unclear and warrant further investigation. It is worth noting that correlation does not imply causation, and additional research is needed to explore the underlying factors driving this intriguing association.
Nonetheless, our study offers a captivating glimpse into the uncharted territory of statistical relationships, demonstrating that even the most seemingly disparate entities may be connected in ways that defy conventional wisdom. We invite fellow scholars to join us on this whimsical journey of discovery, where the Vi-hart of administrative assistance takes center stage, challenging our preconceived notions and providing a delightful twist to the landscape of labor trends.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study presents compelling evidence of a remarkably strong correlation between the average views of ViHart's YouTube videos and the number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. This unexpected connection between whimsical online content and the demand for administrative support introduces a refreshing twist to the labor trends landscape. Like a captivating plot twist in an engrossing novel, our findings challenge conventional wisdom, proving that statistical relationships can harbor delightful surprises.

The high correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value firmly support the earlier work of Smith (2015) and the lively social media discussions, adding empirical weight to the airy musings that had previously captured the attention of digital communities. While Brown (2019) and White (2020) provided insightful perspectives on the influence of online creativity on professional spheres and the evolving roles of administrative support, our study's robust statistical analysis further solidifies the intriguing connection that they had hinted at. Like daring detectives piecing together clues in a captivating mystery, we have convincingly illustrated the unexpected cohesion between ViHart's enchanting videos and the demand for executive administrative assistants.

In a nod to the lively debates and meme-worthy content that permeated social media, our findings serve as a validating punchline to the quirky alignment of seemingly unrelated phenomena. The scatterplot, akin to a visually stunning climax in a comedic performance, captures the striking correlation between ViHart's YouTube stardom and the demand for administrative support, leaving the audience (or in this case, the scholarly community) in awe of the unanticipated synchrony.

While our results embody the lively spirit of our findings, it is imperative to approach them with cautious sobriety. As in a rollercoaster ride where unexpected loops and turns evoke both excitement and trepidation, we must acknowledge that correlation does not imply causation. Our study merely scratches the surface of this whimsical relationship, leaving room for further investigation into the underlying causative mechanisms.

Our research not only uncovers an unprecedented link but also beckons researchers to join us on this engaging journey of discovery. The Vi-hart of administrative assistance has proven to be an unexpected delight, challenging our preconceived notions and injecting a playful twist into the discourse of labor trends. Just as ViHart's videos captivate audiences with their innovative charm, our study captivatingly intertwines online creativity and labor demand, leaving the scholarly community intrigued and ready to embark on further explorations of this delightful statistical absurdity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average views of Vihart YouTube videos and The number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Vi-hart of Administrative Assistance: Exploring the Correlation between YouTube Views and Secretary Stats"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the hitherto unexplored connection between the average views of ViHart's innovative YouTube videos and the number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. By utilizing data from YouTube and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our study has revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9429608 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2010 to 2022. Through a series of intricate statistical analyses, we have uncovered an intriguing relationship that defies conventional wisdom. Our findings not only shed light on the impact of online creativity on labor trends but also provide a refreshing twist on the oftentimes mundane world of administrative support.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
In the realm of academic research, there are often unexpected correlations that leave scholars raising their eyebrows, scratching their heads, and whispering, "Well, I'll be a monkey's uncle." Such is the case with our latest investigation, which seeks to unravel the enigmatic relationship between ViHart's captivating YouTube videos and the number of executive administrative assistants in the fine state of Michigan.
While one might initially assume that these two entities exist in entirely separate spheres – one in the colorful, pixelated universe of online entertainment, the other in the bustling halls of bureaucratic efficiency – our data has defied expectations and thrown a curveball that would make even the most seasoned baseball pitcher go, "Hey, that's unexpected!"
The aim of this paper is not just to present you with a collection of facts and figures, but to take you on a rollercoaster ride through the often-uncharted terrain of statistical peculiarity. We implore you to fasten your seatbelts, keep your arms and legs inside the vehicle at all times, and prepare to be both entertained and enlightened by the unexpected correlations that lie ahead.
But enough with the foreplay – let's dive into the heart of the matter, where we shall unravel the Vi-hart of administrative assistance!

[[RESULTS]]
Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation between the average views of ViHart's YouTube videos and the number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9429608, indicating a highly positive relationship between these two variables. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8891750 suggests that approximately 88.92% of the variation in the number of executive administrative assistants can be explained by the average views of ViHart's YouTube videos. The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that this relationship is statistically significant.
The scatterplot in Figure 1 demonstrates the striking correlation between the average views of ViHart's YouTube videos and the number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. The data points form a tight cluster, illustrating the strong positive relationship between the variables.
The robustness and consistency of these results suggest that there is indeed a meaningful connection between the captivating content of ViHart's videos and the demand for administrative support in Michigan.
That being said, while our statistical analysis has yielded compelling results, it is crucial to interpret these findings within a broader context and exercise caution in drawing overly simplistic conclusions. Despite the undeniable correlation, the causative mechanisms underlying this relationship remain unclear and warrant further investigation. It is worth noting that correlation does not imply causation, and additional research is needed to explore the underlying factors driving this intriguing association.
Nonetheless, our study offers a captivating glimpse into the uncharted territory of statistical relationships, demonstrating that even the most seemingly disparate entities may be connected in ways that defy conventional wisdom. We invite fellow scholars to join us on this whimsical journey of discovery, where the Vi-hart of administrative assistance takes center stage, challenging our preconceived notions and providing a delightful twist to the landscape of labor trends.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our study has unveiled an unexpectedly strong correlation between the average views of ViHart's YouTube videos and the number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. While our findings may have you exclaiming, "Well, I'll be a monkey's uncle," the statistical evidence speaks for itself, revealing a relationship that is as puzzling as it is intriguing.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9429608 and p < 0.01 indicates that there is indeed a Vi-hart at play in the realm of administrative support. One might say that ViHart's captivating content has not only captured the hearts of online audiences but has also left an indelible mark on the demand for administrative assistance in Michigan. It seems that the ViHart effect extends beyond the confines of YouTube screens and into the very fabric of labor trends.

While we do not leap to overconfident conclusions, instead, we opt for a cautious and measured approach, it's safe to say that our study adds a splash of color to the otherwise grayscale world of administrative statistics. The correlation serves as a curious quirk, leaving us pondering the whimsical ways in which seemingly unrelated phenomena can dance in statistical harmony. It seems that in the grand symphony of labor trends, ViHart's YouTube videos have decided to play a delightful duet with executive administrative assistants in Michigan.

So, where do we go from here? Well, one might argue that the findings are as clear as a crystal pi – no further research is needed in this particular realm of statistical shenanigans. We have wrangled enough data to keep even the most ardent statistician content, proving that the Vi-hart of administrative assistance is a captivating saga that requires no sequel.

In the immortal words of ViHart herself, "Let's not stop at conclusions; let's go all the way to surprising twist-clusions." And on that whimsical note, we bid adieu to this delightful journey, secure in the knowledge that statistical absurdity and administrative harmony can coexist in the most unexpected of places. Until next statistical adventure, may the Vi-hart be with you!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Vi-hart of Administrative Assistance: Exploring the Correlation between YouTube Views and Secretary Stats. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Analytics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Vi-hart of Administrative Assistance: Exploring the Correlation between YouTube Views and Secretary Stats. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Administrative Artistry


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Vi-hart of Administrative Assistance: Exploring the Correlation between YouTube Views and Secretary Stats with an abstract of This research paper delves into the hitherto unexplored connection between the average views of ViHart's innovative YouTube videos and the number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan. By utilizing data from YouTube and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our study has revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9429608 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2010 to 2022. Through a series of intricate statistical analyses, we have uncovered an intriguing relationship that defies conventional wisdom. Our findings not only shed light on the impact of online creativity on labor trends but also provide a refreshing twist on the oftentimes mundane world of administrative support.

ChatGPT:

ViHart, YouTube views, executive administrative assistants, Michigan, correlation, Bureau of Labor Statistics, statistical analysis, online creativity, labor trends, administrative support

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Average views of Vihart's YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Average views of Vihart YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
Additional Info: Current total views of videos released that year.

See what else correlates with Average views of Vihart's YouTube videos

The number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of executive secretaries and executive administrative assistants in Michigan
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan

Correlation r = 0.9429608 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8891750 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 88.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Average views of Vihart's YouTube videos) over the 13 years from 2010 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.4E-6. 0.0000013750467584348677000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 0.00014% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 727,248 random variables You don't actually need 727 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.82, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Average views of Vihart's YouTube videos (Average views)3286220155967017298101927650783046578330408308769246330687356616363963217448125392
The number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan (Laborers)286502209017770157201287011890110701016093308930820084209600




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3286220,1559670,1729810,1927650,783046,578330,408308,769246,330687,356616,363963,217448,125392,])
array_2 = np.array([28650,22090,17770,15720,12870,11890,11070,10160,9330,8930,8200,8420,9600,])
array_1_name = "Average views of Vihart's YouTube videos"
array_2_name = "The number of executive administrative assistants in Michigan"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 5265 · Black Variable ID: 25547 · Red Variable ID: 18224
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0