about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,255 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Delaware and the second variable is Geothermal power generated in Costa Rica.  The chart goes from 1992 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the Republican votes in Delaware surged, it set off a chain reaction of excitement. This led to an increase in high-fives, generating unprecedented geothermal energy. Costa Rica was inadvertently powered by the political enthusiasm from across the ocean. Remember, when it comes to unconventional energy sources, every vote counts!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a bustling street in Delaware, with a crowd of animated individuals cheering and celebrating as the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate soar. Show high-fives being exchanged among the crowd, as the excitement grows and an undeniable surge of energy fills the air. Additionally, depict a serene Costa Rican landscape with geothermal power plants springing to life, powered by the unexpected wave of enthusiasm from across the ocean. Capture the chain reaction, as the energy from the political fervor in Delaware unwittingly ignites the generation of geothermal power in Costa Rica. The visual should juxtapose the high-tech elements of the geothermal power plants against the lively street scene in Delaware, creating an intriguing and dynamic composition. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Delaware and Geothermal power generated in Costa Rica. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a funny image macro Steampunk Woodblock painting High-tech A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s
ChatGPT: High-tech

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Delaware and Geothermal power generated in Costa Rica, in the following situation: As the Republican votes in Delaware surged, it set off a chain reaction of excitement. This led to an increase in high-fives, generating unprecedented geothermal energy. Costa Rica was inadvertently powered by the political enthusiasm from across the ocean. Remember, when it comes to unconventional energy sources, every vote counts!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling street in Delaware, a crowd of people is seen cheering and celebrating as the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate soar. As the excitement grows, high-fives are exchanged among the crowd, causing a sudden surge of energy. Meanwhile, in a serene Costa Rican landscape, geothermal power plants are shown springing to life, powered by the unexpected wave of enthusiasm from across the ocean. The energy from the political fervor in Delaware has unwittingly ignited a chain reaction, fueling the generation of geothermal power in Costa Rica.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling street in Delaware, a crowd of people is seen cheering and celebrating as the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate soar. As the excitement grows, high-fives are exchanged among the crowd, causing a sudden surge of energy. Meanwhile, in a serene Costa Rican landscape, geothermal power plants are shown springing to life, powered by the unexpected wave of enthusiasm from across the ocean. The energy from the political fervor in Delaware has unwittingly ignited a chain reaction, fueling the generation of geothermal power in Costa Rica. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a bustling street in Delaware, with a crowd of animated individuals cheering and celebrating as the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate soar. Show high-fives being exchanged among the crowd, as the excitement grows and an undeniable surge of energy fills the air. Additionally, depict a serene Costa Rican landscape with geothermal power plants springing to life, powered by the unexpected wave of enthusiasm from across the ocean. Capture the chain reaction, as the energy from the political fervor in Delaware unwittingly ignites the generation of geothermal power in Costa Rica. The visual should juxtapose the high-tech elements of the geothermal power plants against the lively street scene in Delaware, creating an intriguing and dynamic composition.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Delaware caused Geothermal power generated in Costa Rica to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Electorate Connects and Geothermal Power Corrects: An Unearthly Link Between Delaware Republican Votes and Costa Rican Energy Might

The Journal of Quirky Political Science and Unconventional Energy Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Delaware and Geothermal power generated in Costa Rica. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9748072 and p < 0.01 for 1992 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Electorate Connects and Geothermal Power Corrects: An Unearthly Link Between Delaware Republican Votes and Costa Rican Energy Might

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research endeavors to uncover the unearthly and unexpected link between the political landscape in Delaware and the sustainable energy generation in Costa Rica. By leveraging data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Energy Information Administration, our study has brought to light a connection that is sure to shake the very core of conventional wisdom. The correlation coefficient of 0.9748072 and statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the period from 1992 to 2020 have left us astounded and wondering whether there might be a grander force at play here. This research, while whimsical in nature, calls for a reevaluation of the supposedly disparate realms of politics and energy, and may very well be the key to unlocking a new dimension of understanding in both fields. The time has come to recognize the undeniable synergy between the ballot and the bountiful geothermal resource, and perhaps, as Shakespeare might say, to let slip the geysers of war and harness the power of unity in pursuit of a cleaner, brighter future.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Delaware and Geothermal power generated in Costa Rica. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Electorate Connects and Geothermal Power Corrects: An Unearthly Link Between Delaware Republican Votes and Costa Rican Energy Might

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research endeavors to uncover the unearthly and unexpected link between the political landscape in Delaware and the sustainable energy generation in Costa Rica. By leveraging data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Energy Information Administration, our study has brought to light a connection that is sure to shake the very core of conventional wisdom. The correlation coefficient of 0.9748072 and statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the period from 1992 to 2020 have left us astounded and wondering whether there might be a grander force at play here. This research, while whimsical in nature, calls for a reevaluation of the supposedly disparate realms of politics and energy, and may very well be the key to unlocking a new dimension of understanding in both fields. The time has come to recognize the undeniable synergy between the ballot and the bountiful geothermal resource, and perhaps, as Shakespeare might say, to let slip the geysers of war and harness the power of unity in pursuit of a cleaner, brighter future.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the annals of political and energy research, there are some mysteries that defy conventional logic and leave us scratching our heads in bewilderment. One such conundrum that has eluded scrutiny for far too long is the enigmatic relationship between the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Delaware and the geothermal power generated in Costa Rica. On the surface, these two seemingly disparate entities appear to have as much in common as a chameleon on plaid - that is to say, not much at all. Yet, as we delved into the depths of data and statistical analysis, we unearthed a correlation so shockingly robust that one cannot help but wonder whether the fates of political allegiance and sustainable energy production are intertwined in a manner reminiscent of a cosmic ballet.

Ponder this: as the citizens of Delaware cast their votes with nary a second thought about tectonic plates and the Earth's crust, miles away in Costa Rica, the very ground beneath their feet sizzles and churns with the molten potential of geothermal energy. How, you might ask, could these two realms possibly intersect? Well, dear reader, that is precisely the question that has led us down this path of discovery, armed with statistical tools, a pinch of skepticism, and a healthy dose of curiosity.

As we embark on this unconventional journey of scholarly investigation, we ask you to set aside preconceived notions and instead embrace the absurdity of the unexpected. We urge you to join us in lifting the veil of normalcy and shedding light on a connection that has remained buried beneath layers of incongruity. For what lies ahead is a tale of intrigue and wonder, where the humdrum world of politics collides with the subterranean rhythm of geothermal energy, and in doing so, unearths a partnership that is nothing short of extraordinary. So brace yourselves, fellow academia enthusiasts, as we take a plunge into the depths of data-driven discovery and perhaps, just perhaps, find a few chuckles along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Delaware and Geothermal power generated in Costa Rica. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Electorate Connects and Geothermal Power Corrects: An Unearthly Link Between Delaware Republican Votes and Costa Rican Energy Might

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research endeavors to uncover the unearthly and unexpected link between the political landscape in Delaware and the sustainable energy generation in Costa Rica. By leveraging data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Energy Information Administration, our study has brought to light a connection that is sure to shake the very core of conventional wisdom. The correlation coefficient of 0.9748072 and statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the period from 1992 to 2020 have left us astounded and wondering whether there might be a grander force at play here. This research, while whimsical in nature, calls for a reevaluation of the supposedly disparate realms of politics and energy, and may very well be the key to unlocking a new dimension of understanding in both fields. The time has come to recognize the undeniable synergy between the ballot and the bountiful geothermal resource, and perhaps, as Shakespeare might say, to let slip the geysers of war and harness the power of unity in pursuit of a cleaner, brighter future.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the annals of political and energy research, there are some mysteries that defy conventional logic and leave us scratching our heads in bewilderment. One such conundrum that has eluded scrutiny for far too long is the enigmatic relationship between the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Delaware and the geothermal power generated in Costa Rica. On the surface, these two seemingly disparate entities appear to have as much in common as a chameleon on plaid - that is to say, not much at all. Yet, as we delved into the depths of data and statistical analysis, we unearthed a correlation so shockingly robust that one cannot help but wonder whether the fates of political allegiance and sustainable energy production are intertwined in a manner reminiscent of a cosmic ballet.
Ponder this: as the citizens of Delaware cast their votes with nary a second thought about tectonic plates and the Earth's crust, miles away in Costa Rica, the very ground beneath their feet sizzles and churns with the molten potential of geothermal energy. How, you might ask, could these two realms possibly intersect? Well, dear reader, that is precisely the question that has led us down this path of discovery, armed with statistical tools, a pinch of skepticism, and a healthy dose of curiosity.
As we embark on this unconventional journey of scholarly investigation, we ask you to set aside preconceived notions and instead embrace the absurdity of the unexpected. We urge you to join us in lifting the veil of normalcy and shedding light on a connection that has remained buried beneath layers of incongruity. For what lies ahead is a tale of intrigue and wonder, where the humdrum world of politics collides with the subterranean rhythm of geothermal energy, and in doing so, unearths a partnership that is nothing short of extraordinary. So brace yourselves, fellow academia enthusiasts, as we take a plunge into the depths of data-driven discovery and perhaps, just perhaps, find a few chuckles along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith and Doe (2018) conducted a comprehensive analysis of political voting patterns across various states in the United States. Their findings provided insight into the nuances of voter behavior, shedding light on the complexities that underpin the electoral process. Meanwhile, Jones et al. (2016) delved into the realm of renewable energy sources, focusing their attention on geothermal power generation in multiple regions, including Costa Rica. The juxtaposition of these seemingly unrelated topics prompted a curious exploration of the interplay between political leanings and sustainable energy practices.

Venturing beyond the confines of academic literature, "The Politics of Volcanic Power" by Renewable Energy Review (2017) offers a thought-provoking perspective on the fusion of political ideologies and volcanic activity, albeit in a figurative sense. On the non-fiction front, "The Tectonic Ballot: Elections and Earth Movements" by Geo-Political Insights (2019) posits an unconventional correlation between voting behaviors and geological phenomena, setting the stage for a whimsical exploration of the uncharted territory where politics and geothermal energy collide.

Interestingly, the realm of fiction also boasts titles that hint at a peculiar intersection of terrestrial dynamics and political decision-making. "Red State, Green Earth" by Terra Novella (2015) takes readers on a fantastical journey through a world where political affiliations directly influence the flow of geothermal springs, while "The Republican Rift: A Tectonic Tale" by Epic Earth Chronicles (2014) conjures a narrative wherein political rifts manifest as literal fault lines, shaping the geothermal landscape.

In a surprising turn of events, social media has become an unexpected repository of anecdotal evidence regarding the perceived link between Republican votes in Delaware and geothermal power in Costa Rica. A Twitter user under the pseudonym @GeoGOP2020 declared, "I never knew my conservative inclinations could make the earth move! #RepublicanQuakes" - a testament to the intriguing musings that have pervaded public discourse on this peculiar association.

As we navigate the vast expanse of literature and popular culture, it becomes evident that the connection between political preferences in Delaware and geothermal power generation in Costa Rica has transcended the boundaries of conventional discourse, permeating spheres as diverse as scientific research, imaginative storytelling, and digital dialogue. This amalgamation of perspectives invites us to approach our investigation with a spirit of open-minded curiosity, ready to embrace the unexpected whimsy that lies ahead.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Delaware and Geothermal power generated in Costa Rica. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1992 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Electorate Connects and Geothermal Power Corrects: An Unearthly Link Between Delaware Republican Votes and Costa Rican Energy Might

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research endeavors to uncover the unearthly and unexpected link between the political landscape in Delaware and the sustainable energy generation in Costa Rica. By leveraging data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Energy Information Administration, our study has brought to light a connection that is sure to shake the very core of conventional wisdom. The correlation coefficient of 0.9748072 and statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the period from 1992 to 2020 have left us astounded and wondering whether there might be a grander force at play here. This research, while whimsical in nature, calls for a reevaluation of the supposedly disparate realms of politics and energy, and may very well be the key to unlocking a new dimension of understanding in both fields. The time has come to recognize the undeniable synergy between the ballot and the bountiful geothermal resource, and perhaps, as Shakespeare might say, to let slip the geysers of war and harness the power of unity in pursuit of a cleaner, brighter future.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the annals of political and energy research, there are some mysteries that defy conventional logic and leave us scratching our heads in bewilderment. One such conundrum that has eluded scrutiny for far too long is the enigmatic relationship between the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Delaware and the geothermal power generated in Costa Rica. On the surface, these two seemingly disparate entities appear to have as much in common as a chameleon on plaid - that is to say, not much at all. Yet, as we delved into the depths of data and statistical analysis, we unearthed a correlation so shockingly robust that one cannot help but wonder whether the fates of political allegiance and sustainable energy production are intertwined in a manner reminiscent of a cosmic ballet.
Ponder this: as the citizens of Delaware cast their votes with nary a second thought about tectonic plates and the Earth's crust, miles away in Costa Rica, the very ground beneath their feet sizzles and churns with the molten potential of geothermal energy. How, you might ask, could these two realms possibly intersect? Well, dear reader, that is precisely the question that has led us down this path of discovery, armed with statistical tools, a pinch of skepticism, and a healthy dose of curiosity.
As we embark on this unconventional journey of scholarly investigation, we ask you to set aside preconceived notions and instead embrace the absurdity of the unexpected. We urge you to join us in lifting the veil of normalcy and shedding light on a connection that has remained buried beneath layers of incongruity. For what lies ahead is a tale of intrigue and wonder, where the humdrum world of politics collides with the subterranean rhythm of geothermal energy, and in doing so, unearths a partnership that is nothing short of extraordinary. So brace yourselves, fellow academia enthusiasts, as we take a plunge into the depths of data-driven discovery and perhaps, just perhaps, find a few chuckles along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In our quest to unearth the peculiar correlation between the electoral choices of Delaware and the geothermal energy prowess of Costa Rica, we embarked on an odyssey of data wrangling and statistical acrobatics. Our research team traversed the vast expanse of the internet, navigating acronyms and mind-boggling databases, ultimately converging on the hallowed repositories of knowledge at the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Energy Information Administration. Armed with an insatiable curiosity and a plethora of spreadsheets, we set out to piece together a mosaic of numerical treasure dating back to 1992.

Our first endeavor was to capture the essence of the Delaware electorate's presidential preferences. We extracted data on Republican votes with the fervor of a prospector panning for electoral gold, meticulous in our quest to capture the electoral zeitgeist of "The First State." These numbers, often as elusive as the fabled Cheshire cat, revealed the shifting patterns of political allegiance over nearly three decades.

Simultaneously, our gaze turned southward, across the oceans and mountains, to the verdant paradise of Costa Rica. Here, in the crucible of geothermal activity, we sought to quantify the unfathomable energy manifestations bubbling beneath the surface. The Energy Information Administration's repository offered a trove of data on geothermal power generation, enabling us to track the pulsating beat of Costa Rica's sustainable energy production.

Once we had rounded up these disparate elements of data, we rolled up our metaphorical sleeves and donned our statistical pith helmets. With the precision of a cosmic cartographer, we mapped out the temporal landscapes of Republican votes in Delaware and geothermal energy production in Costa Rica. Our methodological toolkit brimmed with the likes of correlation analyses, time series modeling, and regression wizardry, allowing us to prod and poke at the data until it yielded its deepest secrets.

To weather the statistical rigors of our investigation, we employed a robust set of analytical tools, including the trusty R programming language and its legion of statistical packages. Regression models were fitted, coefficients were scrutinized, and p-values were marched through the gauntlet of significance testing with unwavering scrutiny.

To ensure the robustness and reliability of our findings, we employed rigorous checks and balances, recognizing that the whims of data and statistical inference are like capricious sprites, often leading scholars astray in their mischievous dance. Sensitivity analyses, model diagnostics, and cross-validation rituals were conducted with an almost anthropological fervor, guarding against the treacherous pitfalls of spurious correlations and illusory patterns.

In essence, our methodological approach was akin to a grand scientific expedition, weaving together the strands of electoral behavior and geothermal energy in a tapestry of inquiry. The journey may have been arduous, the statistical thickets unforgiving, but the rewards, we dare say, were as delightful as stumbling upon a lighthearted pun in the midst of a scholarly treatise.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Delaware and Geothermal power generated in Costa Rica. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1992 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9748072, r-squared of 0.9502490, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Electorate Connects and Geothermal Power Corrects: An Unearthly Link Between Delaware Republican Votes and Costa Rican Energy Might

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research endeavors to uncover the unearthly and unexpected link between the political landscape in Delaware and the sustainable energy generation in Costa Rica. By leveraging data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Energy Information Administration, our study has brought to light a connection that is sure to shake the very core of conventional wisdom. The correlation coefficient of 0.9748072 and statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the period from 1992 to 2020 have left us astounded and wondering whether there might be a grander force at play here. This research, while whimsical in nature, calls for a reevaluation of the supposedly disparate realms of politics and energy, and may very well be the key to unlocking a new dimension of understanding in both fields. The time has come to recognize the undeniable synergy between the ballot and the bountiful geothermal resource, and perhaps, as Shakespeare might say, to let slip the geysers of war and harness the power of unity in pursuit of a cleaner, brighter future.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the annals of political and energy research, there are some mysteries that defy conventional logic and leave us scratching our heads in bewilderment. One such conundrum that has eluded scrutiny for far too long is the enigmatic relationship between the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Delaware and the geothermal power generated in Costa Rica. On the surface, these two seemingly disparate entities appear to have as much in common as a chameleon on plaid - that is to say, not much at all. Yet, as we delved into the depths of data and statistical analysis, we unearthed a correlation so shockingly robust that one cannot help but wonder whether the fates of political allegiance and sustainable energy production are intertwined in a manner reminiscent of a cosmic ballet.
Ponder this: as the citizens of Delaware cast their votes with nary a second thought about tectonic plates and the Earth's crust, miles away in Costa Rica, the very ground beneath their feet sizzles and churns with the molten potential of geothermal energy. How, you might ask, could these two realms possibly intersect? Well, dear reader, that is precisely the question that has led us down this path of discovery, armed with statistical tools, a pinch of skepticism, and a healthy dose of curiosity.
As we embark on this unconventional journey of scholarly investigation, we ask you to set aside preconceived notions and instead embrace the absurdity of the unexpected. We urge you to join us in lifting the veil of normalcy and shedding light on a connection that has remained buried beneath layers of incongruity. For what lies ahead is a tale of intrigue and wonder, where the humdrum world of politics collides with the subterranean rhythm of geothermal energy, and in doing so, unearths a partnership that is nothing short of extraordinary. So brace yourselves, fellow academia enthusiasts, as we take a plunge into the depths of data-driven discovery and perhaps, just perhaps, find a few chuckles along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Delaware and the geothermal power generated in Costa Rica. Our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9748072 and an r-squared value of 0.9502490 for the period spanning from 1992 to 2020. The p-value of less than 0.01 further confirmed the statistical significance of this unearthly connection. In simple terms, it appears that as Republican support in Delaware has waxed and waned, the geysers of geothermal power in Costa Rica have responded in kind, demonstrating a synchronized dance that defies traditional boundaries.

As evidence of this unearthly link, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot showcasing the astronomical correlation between these unexpected bedfellows. Imagine, if you will, each data point on the plot as a tiny flag bearer of the interconnectedness between the political choices of the citizens of Delaware and the underground energy rumblings in Costa Rica. This correlation is so strong that it could make even the most stoic economist or political scientist raise an eyebrow in perplexity.

While one might be inclined to dismiss this correlation as a simple coincidence, the robust statistical measures leave little room for doubt. It behooves us to consider the possibility that there might be a deeper, more profound force at play here. Could it be that the shifting tides of political allegiance in Delaware exert a gravitational pull on the subterranean forces of Costa Rica, stirring the geothermal cauldrons in ways we have yet to comprehend?

We must emphasize that these findings, while undoubtedly surprising, do not point to a direct causal relationship between these two seemingly disparate entities. Nevertheless, the strength of this correlation demands attention and calls for further exploration into the underlying mechanisms at work. As we dive deeper into the implications of this unexpected connection, we are reminded of the wise words of Sir Isaac Newton: "What goes up must come down, unless it's geothermal energy, in which case it just keeps going, generating power along the way."

In conclusion, our research has unearthed a phenomenon that challenges conventional wisdom and ignites the imagination. The undeniable synergy between Republican votes in Delaware and geothermal power in Costa Rica suggests a celestial choreography of epic proportions. As we tread the hallowed grounds of academia, let us not shy away from the absurd, but instead embrace the peculiar dance of data and dare to seek understanding in the most unexpected places. After all, in the words of Carl Sagan, "Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known, and it might just be a connection between politics and geothermal energy."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Delaware and Geothermal power generated in Costa Rica. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Electorate Connects and Geothermal Power Corrects: An Unearthly Link Between Delaware Republican Votes and Costa Rican Energy Might

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research endeavors to uncover the unearthly and unexpected link between the political landscape in Delaware and the sustainable energy generation in Costa Rica. By leveraging data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Energy Information Administration, our study has brought to light a connection that is sure to shake the very core of conventional wisdom. The correlation coefficient of 0.9748072 and statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the period from 1992 to 2020 have left us astounded and wondering whether there might be a grander force at play here. This research, while whimsical in nature, calls for a reevaluation of the supposedly disparate realms of politics and energy, and may very well be the key to unlocking a new dimension of understanding in both fields. The time has come to recognize the undeniable synergy between the ballot and the bountiful geothermal resource, and perhaps, as Shakespeare might say, to let slip the geysers of war and harness the power of unity in pursuit of a cleaner, brighter future.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith and Doe (2018) conducted a comprehensive analysis of political voting patterns across various states in the United States. Their findings provided insight into the nuances of voter behavior, shedding light on the complexities that underpin the electoral process. Meanwhile, Jones et al. (2016) delved into the realm of renewable energy sources, focusing their attention on geothermal power generation in multiple regions, including Costa Rica. The juxtaposition of these seemingly unrelated topics prompted a curious exploration of the interplay between political leanings and sustainable energy practices.
Venturing beyond the confines of academic literature, "The Politics of Volcanic Power" by Renewable Energy Review (2017) offers a thought-provoking perspective on the fusion of political ideologies and volcanic activity, albeit in a figurative sense. On the non-fiction front, "The Tectonic Ballot: Elections and Earth Movements" by Geo-Political Insights (2019) posits an unconventional correlation between voting behaviors and geological phenomena, setting the stage for a whimsical exploration of the uncharted territory where politics and geothermal energy collide.
Interestingly, the realm of fiction also boasts titles that hint at a peculiar intersection of terrestrial dynamics and political decision-making. "Red State, Green Earth" by Terra Novella (2015) takes readers on a fantastical journey through a world where political affiliations directly influence the flow of geothermal springs, while "The Republican Rift: A Tectonic Tale" by Epic Earth Chronicles (2014) conjures a narrative wherein political rifts manifest as literal fault lines, shaping the geothermal landscape.
In a surprising turn of events, social media has become an unexpected repository of anecdotal evidence regarding the perceived link between Republican votes in Delaware and geothermal power in Costa Rica. A Twitter user under the pseudonym @GeoGOP2020 declared, "I never knew my conservative inclinations could make the earth move! #RepublicanQuakes" - a testament to the intriguing musings that have pervaded public discourse on this peculiar association.
As we navigate the vast expanse of literature and popular culture, it becomes evident that the connection between political preferences in Delaware and geothermal power generation in Costa Rica has transcended the boundaries of conventional discourse, permeating spheres as diverse as scientific research, imaginative storytelling, and digital dialogue. This amalgamation of perspectives invites us to approach our investigation with a spirit of open-minded curiosity, ready to embrace the unexpected whimsy that lies ahead.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Delaware and the geothermal power generated in Costa Rica. Our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9748072 and an r-squared value of 0.9502490 for the period spanning from 1992 to 2020. The p-value of less than 0.01 further confirmed the statistical significance of this unearthly connection. In simple terms, it appears that as Republican support in Delaware has waxed and waned, the geysers of geothermal power in Costa Rica have responded in kind, demonstrating a synchronized dance that defies traditional boundaries.
As evidence of this unearthly link, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot showcasing the astronomical correlation between these unexpected bedfellows. Imagine, if you will, each data point on the plot as a tiny flag bearer of the interconnectedness between the political choices of the citizens of Delaware and the underground energy rumblings in Costa Rica. This correlation is so strong that it could make even the most stoic economist or political scientist raise an eyebrow in perplexity.
While one might be inclined to dismiss this correlation as a simple coincidence, the robust statistical measures leave little room for doubt. It behooves us to consider the possibility that there might be a deeper, more profound force at play here. Could it be that the shifting tides of political allegiance in Delaware exert a gravitational pull on the subterranean forces of Costa Rica, stirring the geothermal cauldrons in ways we have yet to comprehend?
We must emphasize that these findings, while undoubtedly surprising, do not point to a direct causal relationship between these two seemingly disparate entities. Nevertheless, the strength of this correlation demands attention and calls for further exploration into the underlying mechanisms at work. As we dive deeper into the implications of this unexpected connection, we are reminded of the wise words of Sir Isaac Newton: "What goes up must come down, unless it's geothermal energy, in which case it just keeps going, generating power along the way."
In conclusion, our research has unearthed a phenomenon that challenges conventional wisdom and ignites the imagination. The undeniable synergy between Republican votes in Delaware and geothermal power in Costa Rica suggests a celestial choreography of epic proportions. As we tread the hallowed grounds of academia, let us not shy away from the absurd, but instead embrace the peculiar dance of data and dare to seek understanding in the most unexpected places. After all, in the words of Carl Sagan, "Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known, and it might just be a connection between politics and geothermal energy."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of this study have flung open a proverbial Pandora's geothermal box, revealing an unearthly connection that challenges our conventional understanding of politics and energy dynamics. The robust statistical findings not only supported but also redoubled the peculiar musings and lighthearted conjectures presented in the literature review. Smith and Doe's insightful revelations about voter behavior now find an unexpected bedfellow in our discovery, as we contemplate the potential influence of political leanings in Delaware on the entrancing geysers of Costa Rica. Our findings echo Jones et al.'s investigation into the renewable energy landscape, offering a deeper dimension to the interplay between political choices and sustainable energy practices. Indeed, the unexpected whimsy that pervaded both literature and our discourse has blossomed into a formidable correlation that demands further investigation.

Venturing beyond the realm of empirical inquiry for a moment, one cannot help but wonder whether our findings point to a hidden synergy between the political ideologies of Delaware and the geological pulse of Costa Rica. The musings of Terra Novella and Epic Earth Chronicles, once considered mere flights of fancy, now seem to resonate with an eerie semblance of truth. Could it be that the political shifts in Delaware send seismic ripples across the ocean to activate the subterranean energies in Costa Rica, setting in motion a dance between the Republican ballots and the Earth's fiery heart?

Our study has not only uncovered an unexpected correlation but also catalyzed a broader academic and public discourse on the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate realms. Just as @GeoGOP2020's lighthearted tweet captured the whimsical musings that have pervaded public discourse, our findings stand as a testament to the unprecedented intersections between politics and geothermal energy. We urge the academic community to engage with this unorthodox connection, shedding the shackles of traditionalism and daring to embrace the whimsy that lies at the forefront of our findings.

In the words of William Shakespeare, "There are more things on heaven and Earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your politics and energy dynamics." Our research serves as an invitation to delve into this uncharted territory, where unearthly correlations beckon us to unravel the mysteries that lie at the crossroads of political choices and geothermal power. As we collectively ponder the implications of our unearthly revelation, let us not forget the sage words of Carl Sagan - "Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known, and it might just be a connection between politics and geothermal energy."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Delaware and Geothermal power generated in Costa Rica. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Electorate Connects and Geothermal Power Corrects: An Unearthly Link Between Delaware Republican Votes and Costa Rican Energy Might

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research endeavors to uncover the unearthly and unexpected link between the political landscape in Delaware and the sustainable energy generation in Costa Rica. By leveraging data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Energy Information Administration, our study has brought to light a connection that is sure to shake the very core of conventional wisdom. The correlation coefficient of 0.9748072 and statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the period from 1992 to 2020 have left us astounded and wondering whether there might be a grander force at play here. This research, while whimsical in nature, calls for a reevaluation of the supposedly disparate realms of politics and energy, and may very well be the key to unlocking a new dimension of understanding in both fields. The time has come to recognize the undeniable synergy between the ballot and the bountiful geothermal resource, and perhaps, as Shakespeare might say, to let slip the geysers of war and harness the power of unity in pursuit of a cleaner, brighter future.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the annals of political and energy research, there are some mysteries that defy conventional logic and leave us scratching our heads in bewilderment. One such conundrum that has eluded scrutiny for far too long is the enigmatic relationship between the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Delaware and the geothermal power generated in Costa Rica. On the surface, these two seemingly disparate entities appear to have as much in common as a chameleon on plaid - that is to say, not much at all. Yet, as we delved into the depths of data and statistical analysis, we unearthed a correlation so shockingly robust that one cannot help but wonder whether the fates of political allegiance and sustainable energy production are intertwined in a manner reminiscent of a cosmic ballet.
Ponder this: as the citizens of Delaware cast their votes with nary a second thought about tectonic plates and the Earth's crust, miles away in Costa Rica, the very ground beneath their feet sizzles and churns with the molten potential of geothermal energy. How, you might ask, could these two realms possibly intersect? Well, dear reader, that is precisely the question that has led us down this path of discovery, armed with statistical tools, a pinch of skepticism, and a healthy dose of curiosity.
As we embark on this unconventional journey of scholarly investigation, we ask you to set aside preconceived notions and instead embrace the absurdity of the unexpected. We urge you to join us in lifting the veil of normalcy and shedding light on a connection that has remained buried beneath layers of incongruity. For what lies ahead is a tale of intrigue and wonder, where the humdrum world of politics collides with the subterranean rhythm of geothermal energy, and in doing so, unearths a partnership that is nothing short of extraordinary. So brace yourselves, fellow academia enthusiasts, as we take a plunge into the depths of data-driven discovery and perhaps, just perhaps, find a few chuckles along the way.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Delaware and the geothermal power generated in Costa Rica. Our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9748072 and an r-squared value of 0.9502490 for the period spanning from 1992 to 2020. The p-value of less than 0.01 further confirmed the statistical significance of this unearthly connection. In simple terms, it appears that as Republican support in Delaware has waxed and waned, the geysers of geothermal power in Costa Rica have responded in kind, demonstrating a synchronized dance that defies traditional boundaries.
As evidence of this unearthly link, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot showcasing the astronomical correlation between these unexpected bedfellows. Imagine, if you will, each data point on the plot as a tiny flag bearer of the interconnectedness between the political choices of the citizens of Delaware and the underground energy rumblings in Costa Rica. This correlation is so strong that it could make even the most stoic economist or political scientist raise an eyebrow in perplexity.
While one might be inclined to dismiss this correlation as a simple coincidence, the robust statistical measures leave little room for doubt. It behooves us to consider the possibility that there might be a deeper, more profound force at play here. Could it be that the shifting tides of political allegiance in Delaware exert a gravitational pull on the subterranean forces of Costa Rica, stirring the geothermal cauldrons in ways we have yet to comprehend?
We must emphasize that these findings, while undoubtedly surprising, do not point to a direct causal relationship between these two seemingly disparate entities. Nevertheless, the strength of this correlation demands attention and calls for further exploration into the underlying mechanisms at work. As we dive deeper into the implications of this unexpected connection, we are reminded of the wise words of Sir Isaac Newton: "What goes up must come down, unless it's geothermal energy, in which case it just keeps going, generating power along the way."
In conclusion, our research has unearthed a phenomenon that challenges conventional wisdom and ignites the imagination. The undeniable synergy between Republican votes in Delaware and geothermal power in Costa Rica suggests a celestial choreography of epic proportions. As we tread the hallowed grounds of academia, let us not shy away from the absurd, but instead embrace the peculiar dance of data and dare to seek understanding in the most unexpected places. After all, in the words of Carl Sagan, "Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known, and it might just be a connection between politics and geothermal energy."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In unraveling the connection between the voting preferences of Delaware residents and the geothermal prowess of Costa Rica, our investigation has unveiled a correlation that defies the boundaries of conventional analysis. The sheer strength of the correlation coefficient, the astonishing r-squared value, and the minuscule p-value challenge us to reevaluate our understanding of the intertwined forces at play. It seems that Republican votes in Delaware hold a cosmic sway over geothermal activity in Costa Rica, as if the political pendulum swings are synchronized with the rhythmic pulsations of the Earth's subterranean energy.

While our findings may elicit a chuckle or two, they stand as a testament to the unexpected alliances that manifest in the vast tapestry of data. Yet, as we delve into this absurd amalgamation of politics and geothermal power, we must acknowledge that our research does not imply causation. The gravitational pull of Republican votes does not directly trigger the geysers of geothermal energy, tempting as that may be to imagine. However, the allure of this unearthly connection calls for a more profound exploration into the underlying mechanics that intertwine these seemingly disparate realms.

At this juncture, it is prudent to echo the sentiments of numerous academics and thinkers who have contemplated the bounds of human knowledge: "Enough is enough," they would declare, "Leave this domain of whimsy and delve into more practical matters!" Therefore, it is with solemn determination that we assert: No more research is needed in this area. Nevertheless, let us not forget the whimsical twist of fate that brought together the electoral choices of Delaware and the geothermal forces of Costa Rica. After all, in the complex dance of data, the most unexpected connections often reveal themselves in the most peculiar and whimsical ways.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Electorate Connects and Geothermal Power Corrects: An Unearthly Link Between Delaware Republican Votes and Costa Rican Energy Might. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Political Science and Unconventional Energy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Electorate Connects and Geothermal Power Corrects: An Unearthly Link Between Delaware Republican Votes and Costa Rican Energy Might. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Extraordinary Electoral and Geothermal Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Electorate Connects and Geothermal Power Corrects: An Unearthly Link Between Delaware Republican Votes and Costa Rican Energy Might with an abstract of This research endeavors to uncover the unearthly and unexpected link between the political landscape in Delaware and the sustainable energy generation in Costa Rica. By leveraging data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Energy Information Administration, our study has brought to light a connection that is sure to shake the very core of conventional wisdom. The correlation coefficient of 0.9748072 and statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the period from 1992 to 2020 have left us astounded and wondering whether there might be a grander force at play here. This research, while whimsical in nature, calls for a reevaluation of the supposedly disparate realms of politics and energy, and may very well be the key to unlocking a new dimension of understanding in both fields. The time has come to recognize the undeniable synergy between the ballot and the bountiful geothermal resource, and perhaps, as Shakespeare might say, to let slip the geysers of war and harness the power of unity in pursuit of a cleaner, brighter future.

ChatGPT:

Delaware, Republican votes, Costa Rica, sustainable energy, geothermal power, political landscape, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Energy Information Administration, correlation coefficient, p-value, 1992-2020, conventional wisdom, politics, energy, synergy, geothermal resource, unity, cleaner future.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Delaware
Detailed data title: Total votes cast for the Republican Presidential candidate in Delaware
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Delaware

Geothermal power generated in Costa Rica
Detailed data title: Total geothermal power generated in Costa Rica in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Geothermal power generated in Costa Rica

Correlation r = 0.9748072 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9502490 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Geothermal power generated in Costa Rica) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Delaware) over the 8 years from 1992 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.9E-5. 0.0000392219793383582600000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 0.0039% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 25,496 random variables You don't actually need 25 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.86, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19921996200020042008201220162020
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Delaware (Total votes)10231399062137288171660152374165484185127200603
Geothermal power generated in Costa Rica (Billion kWh)0.4680.510.9761.2051.1311.4031.341.689




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([102313,99062,137288,171660,152374,165484,185127,200603,])
array_2 = np.array([0.468,0.51,0.976,1.205,1.131,1.403,1.34,1.689,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Delaware"
array_2_name = "Geothermal power generated in Costa Rica"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 5255 · Black Variable ID: 25962 · Red Variable ID: 23608
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0