about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,244 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Associates degrees awarded in Military technologies and the second variable is The average number of likes on AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the knowledge of military technologies and applied sciences grew, so did the viewers' comprehension of complex scientific concepts. This led to a greater appreciation for the content, resulting in more likes on AsapSCIENCE videos. Remember, understanding the physics of a well-executed high five or the biology of what makes something cute is crucial for modern warfare!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a low poly-styled classroom filled with military technology enthusiasts. Show a group of polygonal students proudly displaying their newly-awarded Associates degrees. They should be engaging in excited discussions about the latest advances in military technologies and their applications. Include a screen nearby displaying an AsapSCIENCE video, where the physics of a well-executed high five and the biology of cuteness are being explained. Show the surge of likes symbolizing the growing appreciation for science in modern warfare. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Associates degrees awarded in Military technologies and The average number of likes on AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Realistic An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Cubism Vaporwave Low poly
ChatGPT: Low poly

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Associates degrees awarded in Military technologies and The average number of likes on AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos, in the following situation: As the knowledge of military technologies and applied sciences grew, so did the viewers' comprehension of complex scientific concepts. This led to a greater appreciation for the content, resulting in more likes on AsapSCIENCE videos. Remember, understanding the physics of a well-executed high five or the biology of what makes something cute is crucial for modern warfare!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a classroom filled with military technology enthusiasts, a group of students proudly display their newly-awarded Associates degrees. They are excitedly discussing the latest advances in military technologies and their applications. Meanwhile, on a nearby screen, an AsapSCIENCE video is playing, explaining the physics of a well-executed high five and the biology of what makes something cute. As the students watch and comprehend the complex scientific concepts, the video receives a surge of likes, symbolizing the growing appreciation for science in the context of modern warfare.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Low poly ] and depicting this scene: In a classroom filled with military technology enthusiasts, a group of students proudly display their newly-awarded Associates degrees. They are excitedly discussing the latest advances in military technologies and their applications. Meanwhile, on a nearby screen, an AsapSCIENCE video is playing, explaining the physics of a well-executed high five and the biology of what makes something cute. As the students watch and comprehend the complex scientific concepts, the video receives a surge of likes, symbolizing the growing appreciation for science in the context of modern warfare. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a low poly-styled classroom filled with military technology enthusiasts. Show a group of polygonal students proudly displaying their newly-awarded Associates degrees. They should be engaging in excited discussions about the latest advances in military technologies and their applications. Include a screen nearby displaying an AsapSCIENCE video, where the physics of a well-executed high five and the biology of cuteness are being explained. Show the surge of likes symbolizing the growing appreciation for science in modern warfare.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Associates degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences caused The average number of likes on AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Associates in Arms: Exploring the Military-YouTube Like Connection

Journal of War-Ready Media Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Military technologies and The average number of likes on AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8328064 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Associates in Arms: Exploring the Military-YouTube Like Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present our findings on the surprising connection between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies and the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos. Drawing on a unique combination of data sources from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we explored this intriguing relationship. Our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8328064 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2012 to 2021.

It seems that military technology education has found an unexpected ally in the world of science communication on YouTube. As our data delved deeper into this association, we couldn't help but ponder: Is the impressive precision of military technologies mirrored in the precision with which YouTube users engage with science content? It's like they say, "The like button can be mightier than the sword" - a modern twist on an age-old adage.

Our paper not only sheds light on this unlikely correlation but also paves the way for further exploration of the intriguing interplay between education, technological expertise, and online engagement. As the data have shown, there's a whole new battlefield to conquer – the digital realm. Join us in this journey of discovery, armed with a solid statistical foundation and a readiness for the unexpected.

In conclusion, this research offers a unique perspective on the intersections of military education and digital engagement, leaving us with a compelling question: Do likes truly conquer all?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Military technologies and The average number of likes on AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Associates in Arms: Exploring the Military-YouTube Like Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present our findings on the surprising connection between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies and the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos. Drawing on a unique combination of data sources from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we explored this intriguing relationship. Our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8328064 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2012 to 2021.

It seems that military technology education has found an unexpected ally in the world of science communication on YouTube. As our data delved deeper into this association, we couldn't help but ponder: Is the impressive precision of military technologies mirrored in the precision with which YouTube users engage with science content? It's like they say, "The like button can be mightier than the sword" - a modern twist on an age-old adage.

Our paper not only sheds light on this unlikely correlation but also paves the way for further exploration of the intriguing interplay between education, technological expertise, and online engagement. As the data have shown, there's a whole new battlefield to conquer – the digital realm. Join us in this journey of discovery, armed with a solid statistical foundation and a readiness for the unexpected.

In conclusion, this research offers a unique perspective on the intersections of military education and digital engagement, leaving us with a compelling question: Do likes truly conquer all?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the saying goes, "There's no such thing as a free launch", but what if we tell you that there might just be a "free" like? In this paper, we aim to unravel the enigmatic connection between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies and the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos. We have ingeniously named this phenomenon "Associates in Arms", because why not add a touch of drama to statistical research?

It's no secret that military technology is at the forefront of innovation, but who would have thought that its ripple effect would reach the realm of popular science communication? The correlation coefficient of 0.8328064 that emerged from our analysis has left us with more questions than answers. It's like trying to figure out if a tank and a telescope have anything in common – quite the sight to behold!

The statistical significance of our findings with p < 0.01 has left us feeling like we've struck gold in a minefield. It's like finding the perfect recipe for statistical success – a dash of military technology education, a sprinkle of scientific curiosity, and a generous serving of YouTube engagement.

As we delve into this unexpected union of military technology education and YouTube likes, we invite you to don your statistical armor and join us in this quest for understanding. After all, in the world of research, as in battle, it pays to be well-armed with data and a sense of humor. Because as they say, "You can't spell 'research' without 'search', and we're on the hunt for some statistical treasures!

In the next sections of this paper, we will unpack the data and methodology behind our findings, offering a closer look at the intricate dance of numbers and correlations. So get ready to navigate the terrain of statistical significance and correlation coefficients with us, as we embark on this whimsical journey of exploration. As Sir Francis Bacon once said, "Knowledge is like a garden; if it is not cultivated, it cannot be harvested." So, let's roll up our sleeves and reap the statistical fruits of our labor, with an added pinch of scientific curiosity and a sprinkle of dad jokes along the way.

Stay tuned for a research adventure that's statistically armed and humorously dangerous!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Military technologies and The average number of likes on AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Associates in Arms: Exploring the Military-YouTube Like Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present our findings on the surprising connection between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies and the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos. Drawing on a unique combination of data sources from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we explored this intriguing relationship. Our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8328064 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2012 to 2021.

It seems that military technology education has found an unexpected ally in the world of science communication on YouTube. As our data delved deeper into this association, we couldn't help but ponder: Is the impressive precision of military technologies mirrored in the precision with which YouTube users engage with science content? It's like they say, "The like button can be mightier than the sword" - a modern twist on an age-old adage.

Our paper not only sheds light on this unlikely correlation but also paves the way for further exploration of the intriguing interplay between education, technological expertise, and online engagement. As the data have shown, there's a whole new battlefield to conquer – the digital realm. Join us in this journey of discovery, armed with a solid statistical foundation and a readiness for the unexpected.

In conclusion, this research offers a unique perspective on the intersections of military education and digital engagement, leaving us with a compelling question: Do likes truly conquer all?

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the saying goes, "There's no such thing as a free launch", but what if we tell you that there might just be a "free" like? In this paper, we aim to unravel the enigmatic connection between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies and the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos. We have ingeniously named this phenomenon "Associates in Arms", because why not add a touch of drama to statistical research?
It's no secret that military technology is at the forefront of innovation, but who would have thought that its ripple effect would reach the realm of popular science communication? The correlation coefficient of 0.8328064 that emerged from our analysis has left us with more questions than answers. It's like trying to figure out if a tank and a telescope have anything in common – quite the sight to behold!
The statistical significance of our findings with p < 0.01 has left us feeling like we've struck gold in a minefield. It's like finding the perfect recipe for statistical success – a dash of military technology education, a sprinkle of scientific curiosity, and a generous serving of YouTube engagement.
As we delve into this unexpected union of military technology education and YouTube likes, we invite you to don your statistical armor and join us in this quest for understanding. After all, in the world of research, as in battle, it pays to be well-armed with data and a sense of humor. Because as they say, "You can't spell 'research' without 'search', and we're on the hunt for some statistical treasures!
In the next sections of this paper, we will unpack the data and methodology behind our findings, offering a closer look at the intricate dance of numbers and correlations. So get ready to navigate the terrain of statistical significance and correlation coefficients with us, as we embark on this whimsical journey of exploration. As Sir Francis Bacon once said, "Knowledge is like a garden; if it is not cultivated, it cannot be harvested." So, let's roll up our sleeves and reap the statistical fruits of our labor, with an added pinch of scientific curiosity and a sprinkle of dad jokes along the way.
Stay tuned for a research adventure that's statistically armed and humorously dangerous!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2015) explored the trends in Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies and the potential implications for technological innovation. Their findings laid the groundwork for understanding the impact of military education on technological advances, but what they didn't anticipate was the unexpected twist of fate that awaited them in the realm of social media engagement. It's like discovering a hidden compartment in a tank – a surprising revelation amidst the expected armor.

Jones (2018) delved into the realm of online engagement and its relationship to educational backgrounds, shedding light on the patterns of interaction between individuals with diverse academic pursuits. Little did Jones know that the path would lead to an unforeseen intersection between military technology education and the world of science communication on YouTube. It's like stumbling upon a rare artifact during a routine excavation – a discovery that changes the entire course of exploration.

As we consider the unexpected connection between military technology education and YouTube likes, we can't help but ponder the significance of this unprecedented alliance. It's like witnessing the fusion of two seemingly unrelated elements – a scientific experiment that evolves into a captivating spectacle.

Now, let's take a moment to explore some non-fiction books related to military technologies and popular science communication. In "Rise of the Machines: The Military's Technological Evolution" by John Smith, the author provides a comprehensive analysis of the developments in military technology. On the other end of the spectrum, "Viral Science: The Art of Science Communication on YouTube" by Jane Doe presents an in-depth exploration of science communication in digital spaces.

Turning to the realm of fiction, "The Quantum Conundrum" by Alan Jones offers a gripping tale of scientific discovery and unexpected connections. Similarly, in "Mars Attacks!" by Tim Burton, the unexpected encounter between Earthlings and alien technology leads to a series of unforeseen events. These fictional narratives serve as a reminder that reality often surpasses imagination.

In our quest for a deeper understanding of online engagement, we turned to a few TV shows that might shed light on the dynamics of digital interaction. "MythBusters" and "How It's Made" offer insights into scientific exploration and technological innovation, while "The Big Bang Theory" provides a lighthearted glimpse into the world of scientific curiosity and social dynamics. The unexpected twists and turns in these TV shows parallel the surprising journey of our research.

Dad Joke Alert! Why did the statistician join the military? He heard they were experts in precision engagement.

In light of these diverse sources of knowledge and entertainment, our exploration of the connection between military education and YouTube engagement takes on a new dimension. It's like embarking on a quest for buried treasure and stumbling upon a wealth of unexpected connections. As we navigate this uncharted territory, armed with data and a sense of humor, we invite our readers to join us in this whimsical journey of statistical discovery. After all, in the world of research, as in comedy, timing is everything - and the data has spoken.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Military technologies and The average number of likes on AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Associates in Arms: Exploring the Military-YouTube Like Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present our findings on the surprising connection between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies and the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos. Drawing on a unique combination of data sources from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we explored this intriguing relationship. Our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8328064 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2012 to 2021.

It seems that military technology education has found an unexpected ally in the world of science communication on YouTube. As our data delved deeper into this association, we couldn't help but ponder: Is the impressive precision of military technologies mirrored in the precision with which YouTube users engage with science content? It's like they say, "The like button can be mightier than the sword" - a modern twist on an age-old adage.

Our paper not only sheds light on this unlikely correlation but also paves the way for further exploration of the intriguing interplay between education, technological expertise, and online engagement. As the data have shown, there's a whole new battlefield to conquer – the digital realm. Join us in this journey of discovery, armed with a solid statistical foundation and a readiness for the unexpected.

In conclusion, this research offers a unique perspective on the intersections of military education and digital engagement, leaving us with a compelling question: Do likes truly conquer all?

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the saying goes, "There's no such thing as a free launch", but what if we tell you that there might just be a "free" like? In this paper, we aim to unravel the enigmatic connection between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies and the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos. We have ingeniously named this phenomenon "Associates in Arms", because why not add a touch of drama to statistical research?
It's no secret that military technology is at the forefront of innovation, but who would have thought that its ripple effect would reach the realm of popular science communication? The correlation coefficient of 0.8328064 that emerged from our analysis has left us with more questions than answers. It's like trying to figure out if a tank and a telescope have anything in common – quite the sight to behold!
The statistical significance of our findings with p < 0.01 has left us feeling like we've struck gold in a minefield. It's like finding the perfect recipe for statistical success – a dash of military technology education, a sprinkle of scientific curiosity, and a generous serving of YouTube engagement.
As we delve into this unexpected union of military technology education and YouTube likes, we invite you to don your statistical armor and join us in this quest for understanding. After all, in the world of research, as in battle, it pays to be well-armed with data and a sense of humor. Because as they say, "You can't spell 'research' without 'search', and we're on the hunt for some statistical treasures!
In the next sections of this paper, we will unpack the data and methodology behind our findings, offering a closer look at the intricate dance of numbers and correlations. So get ready to navigate the terrain of statistical significance and correlation coefficients with us, as we embark on this whimsical journey of exploration. As Sir Francis Bacon once said, "Knowledge is like a garden; if it is not cultivated, it cannot be harvested." So, let's roll up our sleeves and reap the statistical fruits of our labor, with an added pinch of scientific curiosity and a sprinkle of dad jokes along the way.
Stay tuned for a research adventure that's statistically armed and humorously dangerous!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the veiled relationship between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies and the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos, our research team embarked on a statistically thrilling journey. Embracing the age-old wisdom that "the devil is in the details", we meticulously gathered data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, spanning the period from 2012 to 2021, and prepared to analyze it with statistical gusto and a sprinkle of humor – after all, every good analysis needs a punchline or two, right?

Our initial data mining expedition involved extracting information on the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies each year. This endeavor took us through a virtual maze of internet databases, not unlike a treasure hunt, with the goal of capturing the essence of military technology education in numerical form. It was like trying to navigate a minefield of data – except, in this case, the mines were full of valuable statistical gems.

Having triumphed in our quest for military technology data, we then turned our investigative lens towards the captivating world of YouTube engagement. We scoured the vast landscape of ASAPSCIENCE's videos, patiently tabulating the average number of likes on their engaging science content. It was a bit like trying to count stars in the night sky, except the stars were "likes", and our telescope was a spreadsheet – a comical juxtaposition of astronomy and data entry, if you will.

With our troves of data in hand, we then proceeded to unleash the power of statistical analysis, wielding mighty tools such as correlation coefficients and p-values to unravel the mysteries of "Associates in Arms". Guided by the timeless wisdom that "correlation does not imply causation, but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively", we dove deep into the statistical ocean, determined to discern any meaningful patterns lurking beneath the surface. It was like trying to decipher Morse code from a distant battlefield – except in this case, the messages were encoded in numbers and scatter plots.

Armed with our trusty statistical artillery and fueled by an unyielding passion for uncovering unusual connections, we rigorously examined the data using various statistical software packages, ensuring that our findings emerged with the utmost reliability and precision. It was like conducting a well-orchestrated symphony of numbers, where each note played a vital role in composing the melody of our research.

Through this whimsically daring approach, we emerged with a newfound understanding of the surprising affinity between military technology education and YouTube engagement. As we present our findings in the following sections, we invite you to join us in marveling at the statistically armed and humorously dangerous journey that led us to this illuminating correlation. As they say, "In the world of research, as in battle, it pays to be well-armed with data and a sense of humor."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Military technologies and The average number of likes on AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8328064, r-squared of 0.6935666, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Associates in Arms: Exploring the Military-YouTube Like Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present our findings on the surprising connection between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies and the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos. Drawing on a unique combination of data sources from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we explored this intriguing relationship. Our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8328064 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2012 to 2021.

It seems that military technology education has found an unexpected ally in the world of science communication on YouTube. As our data delved deeper into this association, we couldn't help but ponder: Is the impressive precision of military technologies mirrored in the precision with which YouTube users engage with science content? It's like they say, "The like button can be mightier than the sword" - a modern twist on an age-old adage.

Our paper not only sheds light on this unlikely correlation but also paves the way for further exploration of the intriguing interplay between education, technological expertise, and online engagement. As the data have shown, there's a whole new battlefield to conquer – the digital realm. Join us in this journey of discovery, armed with a solid statistical foundation and a readiness for the unexpected.

In conclusion, this research offers a unique perspective on the intersections of military education and digital engagement, leaving us with a compelling question: Do likes truly conquer all?

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the saying goes, "There's no such thing as a free launch", but what if we tell you that there might just be a "free" like? In this paper, we aim to unravel the enigmatic connection between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies and the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos. We have ingeniously named this phenomenon "Associates in Arms", because why not add a touch of drama to statistical research?
It's no secret that military technology is at the forefront of innovation, but who would have thought that its ripple effect would reach the realm of popular science communication? The correlation coefficient of 0.8328064 that emerged from our analysis has left us with more questions than answers. It's like trying to figure out if a tank and a telescope have anything in common – quite the sight to behold!
The statistical significance of our findings with p < 0.01 has left us feeling like we've struck gold in a minefield. It's like finding the perfect recipe for statistical success – a dash of military technology education, a sprinkle of scientific curiosity, and a generous serving of YouTube engagement.
As we delve into this unexpected union of military technology education and YouTube likes, we invite you to don your statistical armor and join us in this quest for understanding. After all, in the world of research, as in battle, it pays to be well-armed with data and a sense of humor. Because as they say, "You can't spell 'research' without 'search', and we're on the hunt for some statistical treasures!
In the next sections of this paper, we will unpack the data and methodology behind our findings, offering a closer look at the intricate dance of numbers and correlations. So get ready to navigate the terrain of statistical significance and correlation coefficients with us, as we embark on this whimsical journey of exploration. As Sir Francis Bacon once said, "Knowledge is like a garden; if it is not cultivated, it cannot be harvested." So, let's roll up our sleeves and reap the statistical fruits of our labor, with an added pinch of scientific curiosity and a sprinkle of dad jokes along the way.
Stay tuned for a research adventure that's statistically armed and humorously dangerous!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a strong and positive correlation between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies and the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos during the period from 2012 to 2021, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8328064. This finding suggests that there is a surprising connection between the two seemingly unrelated variables. It's like the forces of statistics and humor have joined together to uncover this unexpected relationship – a statistical enigma, if you will.

Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.6935666, indicating that 69.36% of the variance in the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos can be explained by the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies. It's as if statistical analysis has uncovered a secret pathway to understanding the complexities of online engagement, revealing that there's more to YouTube likes than meets the eye – a statistical plot twist, if you will.

The significance testing yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, reinforcing the strength of the relationship between the two variables. This suggests that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance. It's like finding a statistically significant needle in a haystack of data – a rare and remarkable occurrence in the world of statistics. The results have led us to conclude that there is indeed a noteworthy association between military technology education and the appreciation of science on YouTube – a statistical bond that transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries.

The scatterplot presented in Figure 1 visually reinforces the strong correlation between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies and the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos. The data points form a clear, upward trend, indicating a positive relationship between the two variables. It's as if the data itself is applauding this unexpected discovery with a round of statistical applause – a standing ovation for the intersection of military education and digital engagement.

In summary, our findings have unveiled a remarkable connection between military technology education and online engagement, prompting further exploration into the nuances of this relationship. The statistical analysis has not only broadened our understanding of these two domains but has also added a touch of statistical intrigue to the world of YouTube engagement. It seems that when it comes to statistical surprise, this unexpected association takes the cake – or perhaps we should say, takes the pi!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Military technologies and The average number of likes on AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Associates in Arms: Exploring the Military-YouTube Like Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present our findings on the surprising connection between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies and the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos. Drawing on a unique combination of data sources from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we explored this intriguing relationship. Our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8328064 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2012 to 2021.

It seems that military technology education has found an unexpected ally in the world of science communication on YouTube. As our data delved deeper into this association, we couldn't help but ponder: Is the impressive precision of military technologies mirrored in the precision with which YouTube users engage with science content? It's like they say, "The like button can be mightier than the sword" - a modern twist on an age-old adage.

Our paper not only sheds light on this unlikely correlation but also paves the way for further exploration of the intriguing interplay between education, technological expertise, and online engagement. As the data have shown, there's a whole new battlefield to conquer – the digital realm. Join us in this journey of discovery, armed with a solid statistical foundation and a readiness for the unexpected.

In conclusion, this research offers a unique perspective on the intersections of military education and digital engagement, leaving us with a compelling question: Do likes truly conquer all?

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2015) explored the trends in Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies and the potential implications for technological innovation. Their findings laid the groundwork for understanding the impact of military education on technological advances, but what they didn't anticipate was the unexpected twist of fate that awaited them in the realm of social media engagement. It's like discovering a hidden compartment in a tank – a surprising revelation amidst the expected armor.
Jones (2018) delved into the realm of online engagement and its relationship to educational backgrounds, shedding light on the patterns of interaction between individuals with diverse academic pursuits. Little did Jones know that the path would lead to an unforeseen intersection between military technology education and the world of science communication on YouTube. It's like stumbling upon a rare artifact during a routine excavation – a discovery that changes the entire course of exploration.
As we consider the unexpected connection between military technology education and YouTube likes, we can't help but ponder the significance of this unprecedented alliance. It's like witnessing the fusion of two seemingly unrelated elements – a scientific experiment that evolves into a captivating spectacle.
Now, let's take a moment to explore some non-fiction books related to military technologies and popular science communication. In "Rise of the Machines: The Military's Technological Evolution" by John Smith, the author provides a comprehensive analysis of the developments in military technology. On the other end of the spectrum, "Viral Science: The Art of Science Communication on YouTube" by Jane Doe presents an in-depth exploration of science communication in digital spaces.
Turning to the realm of fiction, "The Quantum Conundrum" by Alan Jones offers a gripping tale of scientific discovery and unexpected connections. Similarly, in "Mars Attacks!" by Tim Burton, the unexpected encounter between Earthlings and alien technology leads to a series of unforeseen events. These fictional narratives serve as a reminder that reality often surpasses imagination.
In our quest for a deeper understanding of online engagement, we turned to a few TV shows that might shed light on the dynamics of digital interaction. "MythBusters" and "How It's Made" offer insights into scientific exploration and technological innovation, while "The Big Bang Theory" provides a lighthearted glimpse into the world of scientific curiosity and social dynamics. The unexpected twists and turns in these TV shows parallel the surprising journey of our research.
Dad Joke Alert! Why did the statistician join the military? He heard they were experts in precision engagement.
In light of these diverse sources of knowledge and entertainment, our exploration of the connection between military education and YouTube engagement takes on a new dimension. It's like embarking on a quest for buried treasure and stumbling upon a wealth of unexpected connections. As we navigate this uncharted territory, armed with data and a sense of humor, we invite our readers to join us in this whimsical journey of statistical discovery. After all, in the world of research, as in comedy, timing is everything - and the data has spoken.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a strong and positive correlation between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies and the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos during the period from 2012 to 2021, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8328064. This finding suggests that there is a surprising connection between the two seemingly unrelated variables. It's like the forces of statistics and humor have joined together to uncover this unexpected relationship – a statistical enigma, if you will.
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.6935666, indicating that 69.36% of the variance in the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos can be explained by the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies. It's as if statistical analysis has uncovered a secret pathway to understanding the complexities of online engagement, revealing that there's more to YouTube likes than meets the eye – a statistical plot twist, if you will.
The significance testing yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, reinforcing the strength of the relationship between the two variables. This suggests that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance. It's like finding a statistically significant needle in a haystack of data – a rare and remarkable occurrence in the world of statistics. The results have led us to conclude that there is indeed a noteworthy association between military technology education and the appreciation of science on YouTube – a statistical bond that transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries.
The scatterplot presented in Figure 1 visually reinforces the strong correlation between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies and the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos. The data points form a clear, upward trend, indicating a positive relationship between the two variables. It's as if the data itself is applauding this unexpected discovery with a round of statistical applause – a standing ovation for the intersection of military education and digital engagement.
In summary, our findings have unveiled a remarkable connection between military technology education and online engagement, prompting further exploration into the nuances of this relationship. The statistical analysis has not only broadened our understanding of these two domains but has also added a touch of statistical intrigue to the world of YouTube engagement. It seems that when it comes to statistical surprise, this unexpected association takes the cake – or perhaps we should say, takes the pi!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The journey of scientific inquiry often leads us to unexpected discoveries, and our exploration of the connection between Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies and the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos certainly exemplifies this phenomenon. As we sift through the statistical evidence, it becomes apparent that the interplay between military education and science communication on a digital platform holds intriguing implications. It's like uncovering the unexpected pairing of sodium and chlorine to form salt—an unlikely yet harmonious combination that redefines our understanding of scientific interactions.

Our findings align with the initial insights of Smith and Doe (2015), who laid the groundwork for understanding the impact of military education on technological innovation. Little did they know that this impact would extend into the realm of online engagement, much like a scientific experiment producing unintended yet mesmerizing results. In a humorous twist of fate, it seems that military precision has found an ally in the precise engagement of YouTube users—perhaps a case of "like attracts like" in the digital realm.

Similarly, the work of Jones (2018) shed light on the patterns of interaction between individuals with diverse educational backgrounds, but the unforeseen intersection between military technology education and science communication on YouTube adds a new layer of complexity to this relationship. It's like conducting a grand experiment where the variables, armed with degrees in military technologies and an affinity for scientific content, converge in a surprising statistical embrace.

Our data reaffirmed the significant correlation between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies and the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos, echoing the unexpected twists and turns of scientific exploration depicted in fictional narratives such as "The Quantum Conundrum" or "Mars Attacks!" Statistical significance testing further emphasized the strength of this relationship, underscoring the rarity and remarkable nature of this discovery.

Drawing on the principles of statistical analysis, our research offers a unique perspective on the interplay between education and digital engagement, exemplifying that in the world of statistics, as in life, there are often unexpected connections waiting to be unveiled. Much like a good dad joke, this surprising correlation between military technology education and YouTube engagement adds a touch of lighthearted amusement to the otherwise serious landscape of statistical research. After all, in the world of statistical analysis, timing is everything – and in this case, the timing of our findings couldn't have been more perfect.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Military technologies and The average number of likes on AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Associates in Arms: Exploring the Military-YouTube Like Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present our findings on the surprising connection between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies and the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos. Drawing on a unique combination of data sources from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we explored this intriguing relationship. Our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8328064 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2012 to 2021.

It seems that military technology education has found an unexpected ally in the world of science communication on YouTube. As our data delved deeper into this association, we couldn't help but ponder: Is the impressive precision of military technologies mirrored in the precision with which YouTube users engage with science content? It's like they say, "The like button can be mightier than the sword" - a modern twist on an age-old adage.

Our paper not only sheds light on this unlikely correlation but also paves the way for further exploration of the intriguing interplay between education, technological expertise, and online engagement. As the data have shown, there's a whole new battlefield to conquer – the digital realm. Join us in this journey of discovery, armed with a solid statistical foundation and a readiness for the unexpected.

In conclusion, this research offers a unique perspective on the intersections of military education and digital engagement, leaving us with a compelling question: Do likes truly conquer all?

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the saying goes, "There's no such thing as a free launch", but what if we tell you that there might just be a "free" like? In this paper, we aim to unravel the enigmatic connection between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies and the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos. We have ingeniously named this phenomenon "Associates in Arms", because why not add a touch of drama to statistical research?
It's no secret that military technology is at the forefront of innovation, but who would have thought that its ripple effect would reach the realm of popular science communication? The correlation coefficient of 0.8328064 that emerged from our analysis has left us with more questions than answers. It's like trying to figure out if a tank and a telescope have anything in common – quite the sight to behold!
The statistical significance of our findings with p < 0.01 has left us feeling like we've struck gold in a minefield. It's like finding the perfect recipe for statistical success – a dash of military technology education, a sprinkle of scientific curiosity, and a generous serving of YouTube engagement.
As we delve into this unexpected union of military technology education and YouTube likes, we invite you to don your statistical armor and join us in this quest for understanding. After all, in the world of research, as in battle, it pays to be well-armed with data and a sense of humor. Because as they say, "You can't spell 'research' without 'search', and we're on the hunt for some statistical treasures!
In the next sections of this paper, we will unpack the data and methodology behind our findings, offering a closer look at the intricate dance of numbers and correlations. So get ready to navigate the terrain of statistical significance and correlation coefficients with us, as we embark on this whimsical journey of exploration. As Sir Francis Bacon once said, "Knowledge is like a garden; if it is not cultivated, it cannot be harvested." So, let's roll up our sleeves and reap the statistical fruits of our labor, with an added pinch of scientific curiosity and a sprinkle of dad jokes along the way.
Stay tuned for a research adventure that's statistically armed and humorously dangerous!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a strong and positive correlation between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies and the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos during the period from 2012 to 2021, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8328064. This finding suggests that there is a surprising connection between the two seemingly unrelated variables. It's like the forces of statistics and humor have joined together to uncover this unexpected relationship – a statistical enigma, if you will.
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.6935666, indicating that 69.36% of the variance in the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos can be explained by the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies. It's as if statistical analysis has uncovered a secret pathway to understanding the complexities of online engagement, revealing that there's more to YouTube likes than meets the eye – a statistical plot twist, if you will.
The significance testing yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, reinforcing the strength of the relationship between the two variables. This suggests that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance. It's like finding a statistically significant needle in a haystack of data – a rare and remarkable occurrence in the world of statistics. The results have led us to conclude that there is indeed a noteworthy association between military technology education and the appreciation of science on YouTube – a statistical bond that transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries.
The scatterplot presented in Figure 1 visually reinforces the strong correlation between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies and the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos. The data points form a clear, upward trend, indicating a positive relationship between the two variables. It's as if the data itself is applauding this unexpected discovery with a round of statistical applause – a standing ovation for the intersection of military education and digital engagement.
In summary, our findings have unveiled a remarkable connection between military technology education and online engagement, prompting further exploration into the nuances of this relationship. The statistical analysis has not only broadened our understanding of these two domains but has also added a touch of statistical intrigue to the world of YouTube engagement. It seems that when it comes to statistical surprise, this unexpected association takes the cake – or perhaps we should say, takes the pi!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

Our research has uncovered a robust and intriguing relationship between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies and the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos. This unexpected correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8328064 and a p-value of less than 0.01, has left us marveling at the statistical symphony playing out in the digital sphere. It's as if statistical analysis has enlisted in the service of uncovering the mysteries of YouTube engagement – a statistical boot camp, if you will.

One cannot help but wonder at the sheer force of this statistical revelation. It's like discovering a scientific Easter egg in the data – a delightful surprise that leaves us both pondering and smiling. Speaking of eggs, did you hear about the egg who went to a military technology seminar? It was a real "shell-shocked" experience!

Our findings highlight the need for further exploration of the unexpected interplay between military education and online engagement, offering a new lens through which to view the dynamics of digital interaction. The sheer magnitude of our coefficient of determination (r-squared) at 0.6935666 is akin to stumbling upon a statistical pot of gold – a treasure trove of insights waiting to be unearthed. It's like discovering a statistical diamond in the rough – a rare and precious gem that transcends the ordinary realms of research.

As we draw the curtains on this thought-provoking journey, we assert with confidence that no further research in this area is needed. The statistical connections have been made, the evidence is clear. It's like finding a statistical needle in a haystack and realizing that it's actually a statistical compass – pointing us in the direction of a new frontier of inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Associates in Arms: Exploring the Military-YouTube Like Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of War-Ready Media Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Associates in Arms: Exploring the Military-YouTube Like Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Digital Warfare Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Associates in Arms: Exploring the Military-YouTube Like Connection with an abstract of In this paper, we present our findings on the surprising connection between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Military Technologies and the average number of likes on ASAPSCIENCE's YouTube videos. Drawing on a unique combination of data sources from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, we explored this intriguing relationship. Our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8328064 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2012 to 2021.
It seems that military technology education has found an unexpected ally in the world of science communication on YouTube. As our data delved deeper into this association, we couldn't help but ponder: Is the impressive precision of military technologies mirrored in the precision with which YouTube users engage with science content? It's like they say, "The like button can be mightier than the sword" - a modern twist on an age-old adage.
Our paper not only sheds light on this unlikely correlation but also paves the way for further exploration of the intriguing interplay between education, technological expertise, and online engagement. As the data have shown, there's a whole new battlefield to conquer – the digital realm. Join us in this journey of discovery, armed with a solid statistical foundation and a readiness for the unexpected.
In conclusion, this research offers a unique perspective on the intersections of military education and digital engagement, leaving us with a compelling question: Do likes truly conquer all?

ChatGPT:

Military technologies, associate degrees, science communication, YouTube likes, correlation coefficient, National Center for Education Statistics, education technology, online engagement, digital realm, military education, science content, precision, statistical analysis, education data, technological expertise

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Associates degrees awarded in Military technologies
Detailed data title: Associate's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions with a field of study of Military technologies and applied sciences
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Associates degrees awarded in Military technologies

The average number of likes on AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos
Detailed data title: The average number of likes on AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with The average number of likes on AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.8328064 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6935666 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 69.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The average number of likes on AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Associates degrees awarded in Military technologies) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0028. 0.0027794097964196542000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 0.28% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 360 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.43, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Associates degrees awarded in Military technologies (Degrees awarded)98610021084122910471093122612029921106
The average number of likes on AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos (Average likes)36613.176499.360661.210660266910.470289.910778085870.669139.279500.6




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([986,1002,1084,1229,1047,1093,1226,1202,992,1106,])
array_2 = np.array([36613.1,76499.3,60661.2,106602,66910.4,70289.9,107780,85870.6,69139.2,79500.6,])
array_1_name = "Associates degrees awarded in Military technologies"
array_2_name = "The average number of likes on AsapSCIENCE YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 5244 · Black Variable ID: 1245 · Red Variable ID: 25833
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0