about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,228 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and the second variable is Total likes of Deep Look YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2014 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

People were so disoriented by the inaccurate maps that they found themselves seeking out educational content to reorient themselves. As a result, the deep-seated need for geographical correctness led to a surge in likes for Deep Look videos. Who knew that leaving New Zealand off a map could navigate people towards hitting the like button for microscopic animal videos?

Create a meme inspired by the Maps Without New Zealand meme that in some way references Total likes of Deep Look YouTube videos. Try to emulate the style of the meme - don’t violate the copyright, just make it look and feel like the original meme.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme caused Total likes of Deep Look YouTube videos to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Mapping the Meme: Exploring the Relationship between the Popularity of 'Maps Without New Zealand' and Total Likes of Deep Look YouTube Videos

The Journal of Internet Culture and Social Media Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and Total likes of Deep Look YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8568591 and p < 0.01 for 2014 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Mapping the Meme: Exploring the Relationship between the Popularity of 'Maps Without New Zealand' and Total Likes of Deep Look YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar yet enthralling association between the widespread dissemination of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and the total likes garnered by Deep Look YouTube videos. Drawing from data obtained from Google Trends and YouTube over the period from 2014 to 2023, our research team has uncovered a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.8568591 with p < 0.01. Our findings not only shed light on the burgeoning world of internet memes and their impact on online engagement but also offer a whimsical twist to the scholarly pursuit of understanding digital trends. With a touch of lightheartedness, our study maps the uncharted territory of meme influence on viewer preferences, inviting scholars to navigate this playful and thought-provoking intersection of humor and digital culture.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and Total likes of Deep Look YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mapping the Meme: Exploring the Relationship between the Popularity of 'Maps Without New Zealand' and Total Likes of Deep Look YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar yet enthralling association between the widespread dissemination of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and the total likes garnered by Deep Look YouTube videos. Drawing from data obtained from Google Trends and YouTube over the period from 2014 to 2023, our research team has uncovered a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.8568591 with p < 0.01. Our findings not only shed light on the burgeoning world of internet memes and their impact on online engagement but also offer a whimsical twist to the scholarly pursuit of understanding digital trends. With a touch of lightheartedness, our study maps the uncharted territory of meme influence on viewer preferences, inviting scholars to navigate this playful and thought-provoking intersection of humor and digital culture.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the ever-expanding realm of internet absurdity, there exists a peculiar and quite possibly non-existent phenomenon that has piqued the curiosity of scholars and meme enthusiasts alike. The 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme, a whimsical creation that challenges the cartographic imagination by erasing the existence of the Kiwi paradise from world maps, has taken the digital sphere by storm. Simultaneously, the Deep Look YouTube channel, renowned for its enthralling macroscopic explorations of the natural world, has amassed a considerable following of viewers in search of both edutainment and awe-inspiring visuals.

As we embark on this scholarly journey, we find ourselves at the intersection of two seemingly unrelated domains - the whimsical world of internet humor and the mesmerizing allure of science communication. Our inquisitive minds could not help but wonder: is there a plausible link between the dissemination of an offbeat, cartographic meme and the appreciation of captivating nature documentaries on YouTube? Can the absence of a landmass on a world map impact the digital preferences of viewers, or is this nothing more than a quixotic flight of fancy?

Expanding upon this curiosity, our research aims to unravel the mysterious connection between the ascendancy of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and the total likes accrued by Deep Look YouTube videos. To tackle this perplexing enigma, we have turned to the vast sea of data available through Google Trends and YouTube analytics. Replete with statistical analyses, data visualizations, and a dash of whimsy, our study offers a kaleidoscopic view into the interplay between internet memes and digital engagement. As we delve into the depths of this scholarly expedition, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in this lighthearted yet illuminating quest to map the uncharted territories of digital culture and meme influence.

Let us embark on this adventure with a spirit of curiosity and a readiness to navigate the unexpected twists and turns that this peculiar phenomenon promises to unveil. For it is in the lighthearted pursuit of knowledge that we may stumble upon moments of whimsy and wonder. So, buckle up, fellow explorers, as we seek to chart the uncharted, one meme at a time.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and Total likes of Deep Look YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mapping the Meme: Exploring the Relationship between the Popularity of 'Maps Without New Zealand' and Total Likes of Deep Look YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar yet enthralling association between the widespread dissemination of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and the total likes garnered by Deep Look YouTube videos. Drawing from data obtained from Google Trends and YouTube over the period from 2014 to 2023, our research team has uncovered a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.8568591 with p < 0.01. Our findings not only shed light on the burgeoning world of internet memes and their impact on online engagement but also offer a whimsical twist to the scholarly pursuit of understanding digital trends. With a touch of lightheartedness, our study maps the uncharted territory of meme influence on viewer preferences, inviting scholars to navigate this playful and thought-provoking intersection of humor and digital culture.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the ever-expanding realm of internet absurdity, there exists a peculiar and quite possibly non-existent phenomenon that has piqued the curiosity of scholars and meme enthusiasts alike. The 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme, a whimsical creation that challenges the cartographic imagination by erasing the existence of the Kiwi paradise from world maps, has taken the digital sphere by storm. Simultaneously, the Deep Look YouTube channel, renowned for its enthralling macroscopic explorations of the natural world, has amassed a considerable following of viewers in search of both edutainment and awe-inspiring visuals.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, we find ourselves at the intersection of two seemingly unrelated domains - the whimsical world of internet humor and the mesmerizing allure of science communication. Our inquisitive minds could not help but wonder: is there a plausible link between the dissemination of an offbeat, cartographic meme and the appreciation of captivating nature documentaries on YouTube? Can the absence of a landmass on a world map impact the digital preferences of viewers, or is this nothing more than a quixotic flight of fancy?
Expanding upon this curiosity, our research aims to unravel the mysterious connection between the ascendancy of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and the total likes accrued by Deep Look YouTube videos. To tackle this perplexing enigma, we have turned to the vast sea of data available through Google Trends and YouTube analytics. Replete with statistical analyses, data visualizations, and a dash of whimsy, our study offers a kaleidoscopic view into the interplay between internet memes and digital engagement. As we delve into the depths of this scholarly expedition, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in this lighthearted yet illuminating quest to map the uncharted territories of digital culture and meme influence.
Let us embark on this adventure with a spirit of curiosity and a readiness to navigate the unexpected twists and turns that this peculiar phenomenon promises to unveil. For it is in the lighthearted pursuit of knowledge that we may stumble upon moments of whimsy and wonder. So, buckle up, fellow explorers, as we seek to chart the uncharted, one meme at a time.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their groundbreaking work, Smith et al. (2017) examined the influence of internet memes on digital engagement, highlighting the significant impact of visual humor on user preferences. Similarly, Doe (2015) provided insight into the nuances of viewer engagement with online content, revealing the intricate interplay of humor and digital culture. Jones (2019) further contributed to this discourse by exploring the burgeoning world of meme dissemination and its implications for online communities.

Drawing from the field of digital culture and internet phenomena, "Everything Is F*cked: A Book About Hope" by Mark Manson (2019) and "So You've Been Publicly Shamed" by Jon Ronson (2015) offer compelling perspectives on the dynamics of online humor and its effects on individuals and communities. Moreover, from the realm of fiction, the whimsical and thought-provoking scenarios presented in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams (1979) and the playful explorations of reality in "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" by Lewis Carroll (1865) serve as metaphors for the unconventional and unpredictable nature of internet memes.

In a departure from traditional research methods, our investigation incorporates an unconventional approach to literature review. In scouring the vast expanse of digital ephemera, including but not limited to obscure memes, delightfully absurd anecdotes, and even the perplexing contents of CVS receipts, we have endeavored to encapsulate the essence of internet culture and its implications for digital engagement. While the methodology may provoke raised eyebrows among more traditional scholars, we remain steadfast in our commitment to showcasing the whimsical and unpredictable nature of meme influence in the digital sphere.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and Total likes of Deep Look YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and YouTube . You used data from 2014 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mapping the Meme: Exploring the Relationship between the Popularity of 'Maps Without New Zealand' and Total Likes of Deep Look YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar yet enthralling association between the widespread dissemination of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and the total likes garnered by Deep Look YouTube videos. Drawing from data obtained from Google Trends and YouTube over the period from 2014 to 2023, our research team has uncovered a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.8568591 with p < 0.01. Our findings not only shed light on the burgeoning world of internet memes and their impact on online engagement but also offer a whimsical twist to the scholarly pursuit of understanding digital trends. With a touch of lightheartedness, our study maps the uncharted territory of meme influence on viewer preferences, inviting scholars to navigate this playful and thought-provoking intersection of humor and digital culture.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the ever-expanding realm of internet absurdity, there exists a peculiar and quite possibly non-existent phenomenon that has piqued the curiosity of scholars and meme enthusiasts alike. The 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme, a whimsical creation that challenges the cartographic imagination by erasing the existence of the Kiwi paradise from world maps, has taken the digital sphere by storm. Simultaneously, the Deep Look YouTube channel, renowned for its enthralling macroscopic explorations of the natural world, has amassed a considerable following of viewers in search of both edutainment and awe-inspiring visuals.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, we find ourselves at the intersection of two seemingly unrelated domains - the whimsical world of internet humor and the mesmerizing allure of science communication. Our inquisitive minds could not help but wonder: is there a plausible link between the dissemination of an offbeat, cartographic meme and the appreciation of captivating nature documentaries on YouTube? Can the absence of a landmass on a world map impact the digital preferences of viewers, or is this nothing more than a quixotic flight of fancy?
Expanding upon this curiosity, our research aims to unravel the mysterious connection between the ascendancy of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and the total likes accrued by Deep Look YouTube videos. To tackle this perplexing enigma, we have turned to the vast sea of data available through Google Trends and YouTube analytics. Replete with statistical analyses, data visualizations, and a dash of whimsy, our study offers a kaleidoscopic view into the interplay between internet memes and digital engagement. As we delve into the depths of this scholarly expedition, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in this lighthearted yet illuminating quest to map the uncharted territories of digital culture and meme influence.
Let us embark on this adventure with a spirit of curiosity and a readiness to navigate the unexpected twists and turns that this peculiar phenomenon promises to unveil. For it is in the lighthearted pursuit of knowledge that we may stumble upon moments of whimsy and wonder. So, buckle up, fellow explorers, as we seek to chart the uncharted, one meme at a time.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In a valiant attempt to decode the enigmatic relationship between the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and the total likes of Deep Look YouTube videos, our esteemed research team embarked on an odyssey through the labyrinth of data available from 2014 to 2023. To navigate this perplexing quest, our approach was as handcrafted as a beautifully detailed map and as intricate as an entomologist's study of an exotic butterfly. Our intrepid journey began with the collection of internet data so vast it would have made an ancient cartographer blush with envy.

First, we turned to the trove of knowledge offered by Google Trends. In our pursuit of understanding the ebb and flow of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme, we deciphered the cryptic patterns of search interest across different regions - a digital cartographer in search of the elusive X that marks the spot. We waded through the waves of search queries, plotting the rise and fall of this whimsical meme like intrepid sailors braving the uncharted waters of the internet.

Next, our gaze turned toward the realm of YouTube, the stage where Deep Look enthralls its captivated audience. We meticulously cataloged the total likes garnered by Deep Look YouTube videos, comparing them to the seismic ripples created by the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme across the digital landscape. With the meticulousness of an apiarist collecting honey, we sought to discern any correlations, no matter how hidden they may have been.

Furthermore, in our endeavor to infuse our research with a dash of lightheartedness and whimsy, we employed an algorithm exceptionally designed to detect subtle nuances in the levity and absurdity of internet memes, an endeavor as challenging as identifying the elusive Loch Ness Monster in the midst of a YouTube video.

Our examination of this quirky amalgamation of data was akin to a biologist dissecting a particularly intricate specimen, carefully analyzing each component to uncover the underlying bond between 'Maps Without New Zealand' and the likes of Deep Look YouTube videos.

In conclusion, our research methodology was a blend of the dexterous and the delightful, a marriage of meticulous statistical analysis and lighthearted curiosity, orchestrating a delightful symphony of data interpretation and scholarly whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and Total likes of Deep Look YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and YouTube .

For the time period 2014 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8568591, r-squared of 0.7342076, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mapping the Meme: Exploring the Relationship between the Popularity of 'Maps Without New Zealand' and Total Likes of Deep Look YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar yet enthralling association between the widespread dissemination of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and the total likes garnered by Deep Look YouTube videos. Drawing from data obtained from Google Trends and YouTube over the period from 2014 to 2023, our research team has uncovered a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.8568591 with p < 0.01. Our findings not only shed light on the burgeoning world of internet memes and their impact on online engagement but also offer a whimsical twist to the scholarly pursuit of understanding digital trends. With a touch of lightheartedness, our study maps the uncharted territory of meme influence on viewer preferences, inviting scholars to navigate this playful and thought-provoking intersection of humor and digital culture.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the ever-expanding realm of internet absurdity, there exists a peculiar and quite possibly non-existent phenomenon that has piqued the curiosity of scholars and meme enthusiasts alike. The 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme, a whimsical creation that challenges the cartographic imagination by erasing the existence of the Kiwi paradise from world maps, has taken the digital sphere by storm. Simultaneously, the Deep Look YouTube channel, renowned for its enthralling macroscopic explorations of the natural world, has amassed a considerable following of viewers in search of both edutainment and awe-inspiring visuals.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, we find ourselves at the intersection of two seemingly unrelated domains - the whimsical world of internet humor and the mesmerizing allure of science communication. Our inquisitive minds could not help but wonder: is there a plausible link between the dissemination of an offbeat, cartographic meme and the appreciation of captivating nature documentaries on YouTube? Can the absence of a landmass on a world map impact the digital preferences of viewers, or is this nothing more than a quixotic flight of fancy?
Expanding upon this curiosity, our research aims to unravel the mysterious connection between the ascendancy of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and the total likes accrued by Deep Look YouTube videos. To tackle this perplexing enigma, we have turned to the vast sea of data available through Google Trends and YouTube analytics. Replete with statistical analyses, data visualizations, and a dash of whimsy, our study offers a kaleidoscopic view into the interplay between internet memes and digital engagement. As we delve into the depths of this scholarly expedition, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in this lighthearted yet illuminating quest to map the uncharted territories of digital culture and meme influence.
Let us embark on this adventure with a spirit of curiosity and a readiness to navigate the unexpected twists and turns that this peculiar phenomenon promises to unveil. For it is in the lighthearted pursuit of knowledge that we may stumble upon moments of whimsy and wonder. So, buckle up, fellow explorers, as we seek to chart the uncharted, one meme at a time.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and the total likes of Deep Look YouTube videos has led to some rather intriguing findings. After diving headfirst into the vast ocean of internet data, we have emerged with a correlation coefficient of 0.8568591, an r-squared of 0.7342076, and the ever-illustrious p-value of less than 0.01. It seems that the whimsical omission of New Zealand from world maps has indeed found a peculiar kinship with the appreciation of macroscopic wonders on YouTube.

The figure (Fig. 1) corroborates our discoveries, showcasing a scatterplot that unmistakably illustrates the strong correlation between the two variables. The scatterplot is a visual representation of the marriage between the puzzling absence of New Zealand and the fondness for up-close encounters with the mesmerizing details of the natural world on Deep Look. It's almost as if the internet itself is conspiring to draw a map that outlines the uncharted territories of meme influence and viewer preferences.

Our study not only provides evidence of this unexpected symbiotic relationship but also opens a window into the delightful and unpredictable landscape of internet phenomena. As we navigate through the virtual labyrinth of trends and likes, it becomes increasingly apparent that the interplay between memes and digital engagement is not just a whimsical flight of fancy but a genuine force shaping the digital culture. This correlation invites a smirking acknowledgment of the unearthed connection between humor and digital preferences, creating a scholarly doorway to a realm where the jesters of the internet gleefully mingle with the aficionados of intriguing visuals.

The findings of our research not only contribute to our understanding of the impact of memes on online engagement but also add a touch of lightheartedness to the often-serious discourse on digital trends. We hope that this study spurs further playful and thought-provoking explorations at the intersection of digital culture and meme influence, inviting researchers and enthusiasts to venture into this jocular yet illuminating journey. We might just find that the whimsy of the digital world has a way of popping up in the most unexpected places, much like the absence of New Zealand on a map.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and Total likes of Deep Look YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Mapping the Meme: Exploring the Relationship between the Popularity of 'Maps Without New Zealand' and Total Likes of Deep Look YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar yet enthralling association between the widespread dissemination of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and the total likes garnered by Deep Look YouTube videos. Drawing from data obtained from Google Trends and YouTube over the period from 2014 to 2023, our research team has uncovered a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.8568591 with p < 0.01. Our findings not only shed light on the burgeoning world of internet memes and their impact on online engagement but also offer a whimsical twist to the scholarly pursuit of understanding digital trends. With a touch of lightheartedness, our study maps the uncharted territory of meme influence on viewer preferences, inviting scholars to navigate this playful and thought-provoking intersection of humor and digital culture.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their groundbreaking work, Smith et al. (2017) examined the influence of internet memes on digital engagement, highlighting the significant impact of visual humor on user preferences. Similarly, Doe (2015) provided insight into the nuances of viewer engagement with online content, revealing the intricate interplay of humor and digital culture. Jones (2019) further contributed to this discourse by exploring the burgeoning world of meme dissemination and its implications for online communities.
Drawing from the field of digital culture and internet phenomena, "Everything Is F*cked: A Book About Hope" by Mark Manson (2019) and "So You've Been Publicly Shamed" by Jon Ronson (2015) offer compelling perspectives on the dynamics of online humor and its effects on individuals and communities. Moreover, from the realm of fiction, the whimsical and thought-provoking scenarios presented in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams (1979) and the playful explorations of reality in "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" by Lewis Carroll (1865) serve as metaphors for the unconventional and unpredictable nature of internet memes.
In a departure from traditional research methods, our investigation incorporates an unconventional approach to literature review. In scouring the vast expanse of digital ephemera, including but not limited to obscure memes, delightfully absurd anecdotes, and even the perplexing contents of CVS receipts, we have endeavored to encapsulate the essence of internet culture and its implications for digital engagement. While the methodology may provoke raised eyebrows among more traditional scholars, we remain steadfast in our commitment to showcasing the whimsical and unpredictable nature of meme influence in the digital sphere.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and the total likes of Deep Look YouTube videos has led to some rather intriguing findings. After diving headfirst into the vast ocean of internet data, we have emerged with a correlation coefficient of 0.8568591, an r-squared of 0.7342076, and the ever-illustrious p-value of less than 0.01. It seems that the whimsical omission of New Zealand from world maps has indeed found a peculiar kinship with the appreciation of macroscopic wonders on YouTube.
The figure (Fig. 1) corroborates our discoveries, showcasing a scatterplot that unmistakably illustrates the strong correlation between the two variables. The scatterplot is a visual representation of the marriage between the puzzling absence of New Zealand and the fondness for up-close encounters with the mesmerizing details of the natural world on Deep Look. It's almost as if the internet itself is conspiring to draw a map that outlines the uncharted territories of meme influence and viewer preferences.
Our study not only provides evidence of this unexpected symbiotic relationship but also opens a window into the delightful and unpredictable landscape of internet phenomena. As we navigate through the virtual labyrinth of trends and likes, it becomes increasingly apparent that the interplay between memes and digital engagement is not just a whimsical flight of fancy but a genuine force shaping the digital culture. This correlation invites a smirking acknowledgment of the unearthed connection between humor and digital preferences, creating a scholarly doorway to a realm where the jesters of the internet gleefully mingle with the aficionados of intriguing visuals.
The findings of our research not only contribute to our understanding of the impact of memes on online engagement but also add a touch of lightheartedness to the often-serious discourse on digital trends. We hope that this study spurs further playful and thought-provoking explorations at the intersection of digital culture and meme influence, inviting researchers and enthusiasts to venture into this jocular yet illuminating journey. We might just find that the whimsy of the digital world has a way of popping up in the most unexpected places, much like the absence of New Zealand on a map.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The correlation we unearthed between the popularity of 'Maps Without New Zealand' and the total likes of Deep Look YouTube videos is both intriguing and, dare I say, chuckle-inducing. Our findings not only bolster the earlier research pointing to the influence of internet memes on digital engagement but also add a dash of playful whimsy to the somber corridors of digital trends.

Now, let's not brush aside the connections we drew from the literature review. The works of Smith et al. and Doe tantalizingly hinted at the impact of visual humor and online content on user preferences, and we've merrily stumbled onto data that supports their claims. Jones's foray into meme dissemination and its impact on online communities is playfully mirrored in our findings. And in a delightful departure from convention, we've embraced a menagerie of digital ephemera, from obscure memes to perplexing CVS receipts, a daring leap into the unpredictable territory of meme influence in the digital sphere.

Our correlation coefficient of 0.8568591 and p-value of less than 0.01 are more than mere numbers; they are the mischievous winks of digital phenomena, inviting us to giggle at the unexpected kinship between the omission of New Zealand from world maps and the adoration of macroscopic wonders on YouTube. The scatterplot is not just a plot but a carnival mirror reflecting the captivating merger of New Zealand's elusiveness with the allure of Deep Look's microscopic marvels. It's almost as if the meme itself has pirouetted into the realm of digital engagement, twirling with the enchantment of online whimsy.

Our research has not only unearthed this peculiar alliance but has also thrown open a window into the capricious and merry landscape of internet phenomena. The vibrant dance between memes and digital engagement is not just a flight of fancy; it is a veritable force shaping digital culture, inviting us to don our jesters' caps and revel in the frolicsome carnival of the internet. It's as if the digital world has laid out a treasure map, with New Zealand's absence as the intriguing starting point, leading us to unforeseen vistas of meme influence and viewer preferences.

In all, our study is a whimsical yet scholarly celebration of the ensnaring realm where light-hearted humor and serious digital trends hold hands, beckoning scholars and enthusiasts to partake in this merry escapade. As we traverse this terrain, we may discover that the digital world's whimsy pops up in the most unexpected places, not unlike the ever-elusive presence of New Zealand on a map.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and Total likes of Deep Look YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Mapping the Meme: Exploring the Relationship between the Popularity of 'Maps Without New Zealand' and Total Likes of Deep Look YouTube Videos

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the peculiar yet enthralling association between the widespread dissemination of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and the total likes garnered by Deep Look YouTube videos. Drawing from data obtained from Google Trends and YouTube over the period from 2014 to 2023, our research team has uncovered a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.8568591 with p < 0.01. Our findings not only shed light on the burgeoning world of internet memes and their impact on online engagement but also offer a whimsical twist to the scholarly pursuit of understanding digital trends. With a touch of lightheartedness, our study maps the uncharted territory of meme influence on viewer preferences, inviting scholars to navigate this playful and thought-provoking intersection of humor and digital culture.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the ever-expanding realm of internet absurdity, there exists a peculiar and quite possibly non-existent phenomenon that has piqued the curiosity of scholars and meme enthusiasts alike. The 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme, a whimsical creation that challenges the cartographic imagination by erasing the existence of the Kiwi paradise from world maps, has taken the digital sphere by storm. Simultaneously, the Deep Look YouTube channel, renowned for its enthralling macroscopic explorations of the natural world, has amassed a considerable following of viewers in search of both edutainment and awe-inspiring visuals.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, we find ourselves at the intersection of two seemingly unrelated domains - the whimsical world of internet humor and the mesmerizing allure of science communication. Our inquisitive minds could not help but wonder: is there a plausible link between the dissemination of an offbeat, cartographic meme and the appreciation of captivating nature documentaries on YouTube? Can the absence of a landmass on a world map impact the digital preferences of viewers, or is this nothing more than a quixotic flight of fancy?
Expanding upon this curiosity, our research aims to unravel the mysterious connection between the ascendancy of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and the total likes accrued by Deep Look YouTube videos. To tackle this perplexing enigma, we have turned to the vast sea of data available through Google Trends and YouTube analytics. Replete with statistical analyses, data visualizations, and a dash of whimsy, our study offers a kaleidoscopic view into the interplay between internet memes and digital engagement. As we delve into the depths of this scholarly expedition, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in this lighthearted yet illuminating quest to map the uncharted territories of digital culture and meme influence.
Let us embark on this adventure with a spirit of curiosity and a readiness to navigate the unexpected twists and turns that this peculiar phenomenon promises to unveil. For it is in the lighthearted pursuit of knowledge that we may stumble upon moments of whimsy and wonder. So, buckle up, fellow explorers, as we seek to chart the uncharted, one meme at a time.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and the total likes of Deep Look YouTube videos has led to some rather intriguing findings. After diving headfirst into the vast ocean of internet data, we have emerged with a correlation coefficient of 0.8568591, an r-squared of 0.7342076, and the ever-illustrious p-value of less than 0.01. It seems that the whimsical omission of New Zealand from world maps has indeed found a peculiar kinship with the appreciation of macroscopic wonders on YouTube.
The figure (Fig. 1) corroborates our discoveries, showcasing a scatterplot that unmistakably illustrates the strong correlation between the two variables. The scatterplot is a visual representation of the marriage between the puzzling absence of New Zealand and the fondness for up-close encounters with the mesmerizing details of the natural world on Deep Look. It's almost as if the internet itself is conspiring to draw a map that outlines the uncharted territories of meme influence and viewer preferences.
Our study not only provides evidence of this unexpected symbiotic relationship but also opens a window into the delightful and unpredictable landscape of internet phenomena. As we navigate through the virtual labyrinth of trends and likes, it becomes increasingly apparent that the interplay between memes and digital engagement is not just a whimsical flight of fancy but a genuine force shaping the digital culture. This correlation invites a smirking acknowledgment of the unearthed connection between humor and digital preferences, creating a scholarly doorway to a realm where the jesters of the internet gleefully mingle with the aficionados of intriguing visuals.
The findings of our research not only contribute to our understanding of the impact of memes on online engagement but also add a touch of lightheartedness to the often-serious discourse on digital trends. We hope that this study spurs further playful and thought-provoking explorations at the intersection of digital culture and meme influence, inviting researchers and enthusiasts to venture into this jocular yet illuminating journey. We might just find that the whimsy of the digital world has a way of popping up in the most unexpected places, much like the absence of New Zealand on a map.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has provided compelling evidence of the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and the total likes of Deep Look YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient of 0.8568591 with a p-value of less than 0.01 solidifies the unexpected connection between the whimsical omission of New Zealand from world maps and the appreciation of macroscopic wonders on YouTube. Our findings have shed light on the hitherto unexplored territory of meme influence on viewer preferences, emphasizing the playful and thought-provoking intersection of humor and digital culture.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually captures the clear correlation between the absence of New Zealand and the fondness for captivating nature documentaries on Deep Look, offering a whimsical twist to our scholarly pursuit. It seems the internet itself is mapping uncharted territories of meme influence and viewer preferences, leading to a lighthearted and illuminating quest.

This study serves as a gentle reminder that the digital landscape is not immune to the playful antics of internet memes, and sometimes, the whimsy of the digital world has a way of popping up in the most unexpected places, much like the absence of New Zealand on a map. With that in mind, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, as the findings of this study have encapsulated the delightful and unpredictable nature of internet phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Mapping the Meme: Exploring the Relationship between the Popularity of 'Maps Without New Zealand' and Total Likes of Deep Look YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Internet Culture and Social Media Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Mapping the Meme: Exploring the Relationship between the Popularity of 'Maps Without New Zealand' and Total Likes of Deep Look YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Internet Culture Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Mapping the Meme: Exploring the Relationship between the Popularity of 'Maps Without New Zealand' and Total Likes of Deep Look YouTube Videos with an abstract of This paper investigates the peculiar yet enthralling association between the widespread dissemination of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme and the total likes garnered by Deep Look YouTube videos. Drawing from data obtained from Google Trends and YouTube over the period from 2014 to 2023, our research team has uncovered a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.8568591 with p < 0.01. Our findings not only shed light on the burgeoning world of internet memes and their impact on online engagement but also offer a whimsical twist to the scholarly pursuit of understanding digital trends. With a touch of lightheartedness, our study maps the uncharted territory of meme influence on viewer preferences, inviting scholars to navigate this playful and thought-provoking intersection of humor and digital culture.

ChatGPT:

Maps Without New Zealand meme, Deep Look YouTube videos, popularity, Google Trends, YouTube likes, meme influence, digital trends, online engagement, internet memes, viewer preferences, correlation coefficient, scholarly pursuit, digital culture, internet humor

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'Maps Without New Zealand' (without quotes, in the United States)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.

See what else correlates with Popularity of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme

Total likes of Deep Look YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total likes of Deep Look YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Total likes of Deep Look YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.8568591 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7342076 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 73.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total likes of Deep Look YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme) over the 10 years from 2014 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0015. 0.0015396235734603566000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 0.15% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 650 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.49, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Popularity of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme (Relative popularity)0.7777782.82.666673.74.416675.363642.272731.13.72.81818
Total likes of Deep Look YouTube videos (Total likes)79725372994100312077833910526601526850640829574233992292638890




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.777778,2.8,2.66667,3.7,4.41667,5.36364,2.27273,1.1,3.7,2.81818,])
array_2 = np.array([79725,372994,1003120,778339,1052660,1526850,640829,574233,992292,638890,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the 'Maps Without New Zealand' meme"
array_2_name = "Total likes of Deep Look YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 5228 · Black Variable ID: 25117 · Red Variable ID: 25943
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0