about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,197 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air quality in Burlington, Vermont and the second variable is Google searches for 'Smores'.  The chart goes from 2008 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The improved air quality in Burlington led to more people spending time outdoors, and as a result, there was a higher demand for smores, leading to an increase in smores-related searches. Maybe the real secret ingredient in smores is actually fresh air!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image showing a serene park scene in Burlington, Vermont. Families and friends gather around crackling campfires, with children eagerly roasting marshmallows and making s'mores. The setting sun casts a warm glow over the clear blue sky, showcasing the vibrant colors of the park. The air quality is visibly improved, reflecting the clean and fresh atmosphere. As more people join in the outdoor fun, there's a sense of community and enjoyment in the picturesque surroundings. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air quality in Burlington, Vermont and Google searches for 'Smores'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Oragami A Discovery magazine cover image Woodblock painting Voxel art An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air quality in Burlington, Vermont and Google searches for 'Smores', in the following situation: The improved air quality in Burlington led to more people spending time outdoors, and as a result, there was a higher demand for smores, leading to an increase in smores-related searches. Maybe the real secret ingredient in smores is actually fresh air!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a picturesque park in Burlington, Vermont, families and friends gather around crackling campfires, enjoying the crisp, clean air. The sky is a clear blue and the air quality is noticeably improved. As the sun begins to set, more people join in on the outdoor fun, resulting in a higher demand for smores. Nearby, a group of kids excitedly wield marshmallows and chocolate, while their parents search for the perfect stick to roast them on. Meanwhile, on their phones, many individuals are searching for 'Smores', craving the classic treat that perfectly complements their evening in the fresh, invigorating air.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a picturesque park in Burlington, Vermont, families and friends gather around crackling campfires, enjoying the crisp, clean air. The sky is a clear blue and the air quality is noticeably improved. As the sun begins to set, more people join in on the outdoor fun, resulting in a higher demand for smores. Nearby, a group of kids excitedly wield marshmallows and chocolate, while their parents search for the perfect stick to roast them on. Meanwhile, on their phones, many individuals are searching for 'Smores', craving the classic treat that perfectly complements their evening in the fresh, invigorating air. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image showing a serene park scene in Burlington, Vermont. Families and friends gather around crackling campfires, with children eagerly roasting marshmallows and making s'mores. The setting sun casts a warm glow over the clear blue sky, showcasing the vibrant colors of the park. The air quality is visibly improved, reflecting the clean and fresh atmosphere. As more people join in the outdoor fun, there's a sense of community and enjoyment in the picturesque surroundings.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air quality in Burlington, Vermont caused Smores (Google searches for 'Smores') to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Choking on Smog, Craving Smores: Correlating Air Quality in Burlington, Vermont with Google Searches for Sweet Treats

The Journal of Whimsical Environmental Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Burlington, Vermont and Google searches for 'Smores'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8232994 and p < 0.01 for 2008 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Choking on Smog, Craving Smores: Correlating Air Quality in Burlington, Vermont with Google Searches for Sweet Treats"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an analysis of the relationship between air quality in Burlington, Vermont and the frequency of Google searches for 'Smores' over a 15-year period. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team aimed to elucidate the potential impact of air quality on dessert cravings in this picturesque city. Employing statistical methods, we found a remarkably strong positive correlation between air quality index levels and the intensity of 'Smores' searches, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8232994 and p < 0.01 from 2008 to 2023.

The findings of our research shed light on the peculiar connection between environmental factors and culinary preferences, highlighting the unsuspected influence of air quality on the populace's sweet tooth. As the old adage goes, "Where there's smog, there's s'mores." This study not only underscores the need for further investigation into the interplay of atmospheric conditions and snack cravings, but also serves as a lighthearted reminder of the whimsical intricacies that underlie human behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Burlington, Vermont and Google searches for 'Smores'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Choking on Smog, Craving Smores: Correlating Air Quality in Burlington, Vermont with Google Searches for Sweet Treats"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an analysis of the relationship between air quality in Burlington, Vermont and the frequency of Google searches for 'Smores' over a 15-year period. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team aimed to elucidate the potential impact of air quality on dessert cravings in this picturesque city. Employing statistical methods, we found a remarkably strong positive correlation between air quality index levels and the intensity of 'Smores' searches, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8232994 and p < 0.01 from 2008 to 2023.

The findings of our research shed light on the peculiar connection between environmental factors and culinary preferences, highlighting the unsuspected influence of air quality on the populace's sweet tooth. As the old adage goes, "Where there's smog, there's s'mores." This study not only underscores the need for further investigation into the interplay of atmospheric conditions and snack cravings, but also serves as a lighthearted reminder of the whimsical intricacies that underlie human behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between environmental factors and human behavior has long been a subject of interest, with researchers exploring the intriguing connections that underlie seemingly unrelated phenomena. In this vein, our study delves into the correlation between air quality in Burlington, Vermont and the virtual hunt for the quintessential campfire treat, 'Smores,' on the internet. While this investigation may initially seem whimsical, our findings reveal compelling insights into the potential influence of air quality on culinary cravings.

The notion of air pollution impacting people's cravings may seem as absurd as a physicist ordering pizza and remarking, "I prefer my pie with extra gravity." Nonetheless, the idea that pollution might stimulate the desire for sweet treats is not as far-fetched as it may seem. Indeed, as we explore the correlation between air quality and 'Smores' searches, we uncover unexpected patterns that prompt reflection on the idiosyncrasies of human behavior.

As we embark on this scientific escapade, it is important to acknowledge the pervasive presence of puns and plays on words in discussing our research. We aim to strike a balance between the gravity of statistical analysis and the levity that such an unconventional research topic naturally invites. As statisticians, we strive to maintain a serious demeanor while analyzing data, yet we cannot resist the occasional pun – after all, we do enjoy a good "snack-tistical analysis." So, join us as we embark on a journey to explore the sweet and smoky intersections of air quality and snack cravings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Burlington, Vermont and Google searches for 'Smores'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Choking on Smog, Craving Smores: Correlating Air Quality in Burlington, Vermont with Google Searches for Sweet Treats"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an analysis of the relationship between air quality in Burlington, Vermont and the frequency of Google searches for 'Smores' over a 15-year period. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team aimed to elucidate the potential impact of air quality on dessert cravings in this picturesque city. Employing statistical methods, we found a remarkably strong positive correlation between air quality index levels and the intensity of 'Smores' searches, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8232994 and p < 0.01 from 2008 to 2023.

The findings of our research shed light on the peculiar connection between environmental factors and culinary preferences, highlighting the unsuspected influence of air quality on the populace's sweet tooth. As the old adage goes, "Where there's smog, there's s'mores." This study not only underscores the need for further investigation into the interplay of atmospheric conditions and snack cravings, but also serves as a lighthearted reminder of the whimsical intricacies that underlie human behavior.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between environmental factors and human behavior has long been a subject of interest, with researchers exploring the intriguing connections that underlie seemingly unrelated phenomena. In this vein, our study delves into the correlation between air quality in Burlington, Vermont and the virtual hunt for the quintessential campfire treat, 'Smores,' on the internet. While this investigation may initially seem whimsical, our findings reveal compelling insights into the potential influence of air quality on culinary cravings.
The notion of air pollution impacting people's cravings may seem as absurd as a physicist ordering pizza and remarking, "I prefer my pie with extra gravity." Nonetheless, the idea that pollution might stimulate the desire for sweet treats is not as far-fetched as it may seem. Indeed, as we explore the correlation between air quality and 'Smores' searches, we uncover unexpected patterns that prompt reflection on the idiosyncrasies of human behavior.
As we embark on this scientific escapade, it is important to acknowledge the pervasive presence of puns and plays on words in discussing our research. We aim to strike a balance between the gravity of statistical analysis and the levity that such an unconventional research topic naturally invites. As statisticians, we strive to maintain a serious demeanor while analyzing data, yet we cannot resist the occasional pun – after all, we do enjoy a good "snack-tistical analysis." So, join us as we embark on a journey to explore the sweet and smoky intersections of air quality and snack cravings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work "The Impact of Air Quality on Human Health," Smith and Doe investigate the deleterious effects of air pollution on respiratory health and overall well-being. While their focus is primarily on the physical ramifications of poor air quality, the authors inadvertently hint at the potential for air pollution to stimulate cravings for confectionary delights. However, it is not until Jones' comprehensive study, "The Urban Environment and Human Behavior," that a direct link between air quality and dessert preferences is hinted at, albeit subtly. The authors find that urban dwellers exhibit unique behavioral patterns in response to environmental stimuli, with potential implications for dietary choices.

In "Atmospheric Science: An Introductory Survey," the authors address the complex interplay of atmospheric conditions and human activities, illuminating the intricate ways in which air quality can influence everyday behaviors. This academic work provides a solid foundation for understanding the potential impact of air quality on culinary inclinations, setting the stage for our investigation into the relationship between air quality in Burlington, Vermont and the widespread yearning for 'Smores' as evidenced by Google searches.

On a more popular level, books such as "The Air We Breathe: A Novel" by Figueroa and "Smores, Murders, and Mysteries: A Culinary Cozy Mystery" by Baker delve into the atmospheric conditions of their respective settings, albeit in different contexts. These works, while fictional, offer a glimpse into the ways in which environmental elements can influence human experiences, leaving readers pondering the potential effects of air quality on their everyday choices, including culinary indulgences.

Admittedly, our exploration of the relationship between air quality in Burlington, Vermont and 'Smores' searches takes a whimsical turn as we draw inspiration not only from scholarly literature but also from animated series and children's shows. "Hey Arnold!" and "The Magic School Bus" both feature episodes that touch on environmental pollution and its effects, illustrating the pervasive influence of air quality on fictional characters and, by extension, on the viewers' perceptions of environmental factors. While these sources may appear lighthearted, they serve to underscore the ubiquitous nature of environmental influences in shaping human behavior, fostering curiosity about the potential impact of air quality on dessert cravings.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Burlington, Vermont and Google searches for 'Smores'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends . You used data from 2008 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Choking on Smog, Craving Smores: Correlating Air Quality in Burlington, Vermont with Google Searches for Sweet Treats"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an analysis of the relationship between air quality in Burlington, Vermont and the frequency of Google searches for 'Smores' over a 15-year period. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team aimed to elucidate the potential impact of air quality on dessert cravings in this picturesque city. Employing statistical methods, we found a remarkably strong positive correlation between air quality index levels and the intensity of 'Smores' searches, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8232994 and p < 0.01 from 2008 to 2023.

The findings of our research shed light on the peculiar connection between environmental factors and culinary preferences, highlighting the unsuspected influence of air quality on the populace's sweet tooth. As the old adage goes, "Where there's smog, there's s'mores." This study not only underscores the need for further investigation into the interplay of atmospheric conditions and snack cravings, but also serves as a lighthearted reminder of the whimsical intricacies that underlie human behavior.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between environmental factors and human behavior has long been a subject of interest, with researchers exploring the intriguing connections that underlie seemingly unrelated phenomena. In this vein, our study delves into the correlation between air quality in Burlington, Vermont and the virtual hunt for the quintessential campfire treat, 'Smores,' on the internet. While this investigation may initially seem whimsical, our findings reveal compelling insights into the potential influence of air quality on culinary cravings.
The notion of air pollution impacting people's cravings may seem as absurd as a physicist ordering pizza and remarking, "I prefer my pie with extra gravity." Nonetheless, the idea that pollution might stimulate the desire for sweet treats is not as far-fetched as it may seem. Indeed, as we explore the correlation between air quality and 'Smores' searches, we uncover unexpected patterns that prompt reflection on the idiosyncrasies of human behavior.
As we embark on this scientific escapade, it is important to acknowledge the pervasive presence of puns and plays on words in discussing our research. We aim to strike a balance between the gravity of statistical analysis and the levity that such an unconventional research topic naturally invites. As statisticians, we strive to maintain a serious demeanor while analyzing data, yet we cannot resist the occasional pun – after all, we do enjoy a good "snack-tistical analysis." So, join us as we embark on a journey to explore the sweet and smoky intersections of air quality and snack cravings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the potential association between air quality in Burlington, Vermont and the frequency of Google searches for 'Smores,' our research team employed a distinctive blend of statistical analyses and whimsical ingenuity. Oh, the delightfully peculiar paths that intertwine when seeking to unravel the mysteries of human behavior and environmental influences!

The primary source of data on air quality was derived from the venerable Environmental Protection Agency, which provided us with comprehensive records of air quality index levels in Burlington from 2008 to 2023. This allowed us to harness the power of statistical analysis to assess the fluctuating air quality in this idyllic city nestled amidst the Green Mountains.

In a parallel universe of data collection, we turned our attention to that digital oracle, Google Trends, for insights into the frequency of 'Smores' searches over the same 15-year period. The search query, 'Smores,' was meticulously chosen to capture the essence of the nostalgic campfire treat, transcending time and evoking memories of charred marshmallows and gooey chocolate. It seemed, if nothing else, a deliciously appropriate choice for our investigation.

Our methodology went beyond the mere casual observation of trends and statistics, as we sought to breathe life into this empirical pursuit. We navigated the bewildering seas of regression analysis, employing Pearson correlation coefficients and p-values to ascertain whether a relationship existed between air quality and the intensity of 'Smores' searches. Uncovering a correlation coefficient of 0.8232994 with a p-value less than 0.01, we dared to entertain the notion that there might indeed be something more than hot air to the association between air quality and dessert quests. Ah, the sweet satisfaction of a robust statistical link!

It is worth noting that the chosen time frame of 2008 to 2023 provided a substantial canvas on which to paint the portrait of air quality and 'Smores' searches, allowing for a comprehensive exploration of historical fluctuations and contemporary culinary curiosities. This span of years enabled us to capture the nuances of changing environmental conditions and internet proclivities, making our analysis as rich and layered as a perfectly assembled 'smore' nestled between graham crackers.

As we traversed the terrain of our research, we ensured the use of appropriate statistical methods, always mindful of the need to uphold the sacred principles of scientific inquiry. Our approach blended rigor and whimsy, statistical precision and culinary caprice, in the pursuit of unraveling the mirthful mysteries of smog and s'mores.

In realizing the peculiar connection between air quality in Burlington, Vermont and the virtual pursuit of 'Smores,' we hope to inspire fellow researchers to embrace the unexpected and whimsical in their scientific explorations. After all, as we continue to probe the crannies of human behavior and environmental influences, we cannot escape the allure of a well-placed research pun or the whimsy of peculiar correlations. For as William Shakespeare once pondered, "What's in a smore? That which we call a treat by any other name would taste as sweet."

We revel in the distinctive intersection of serious science and savory snack cravings, for it is in this delightfully unexpected realm that our investigation flourishes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Burlington, Vermont and Google searches for 'Smores'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends .

For the time period 2008 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8232994, r-squared of 0.6778220, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Choking on Smog, Craving Smores: Correlating Air Quality in Burlington, Vermont with Google Searches for Sweet Treats"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an analysis of the relationship between air quality in Burlington, Vermont and the frequency of Google searches for 'Smores' over a 15-year period. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team aimed to elucidate the potential impact of air quality on dessert cravings in this picturesque city. Employing statistical methods, we found a remarkably strong positive correlation between air quality index levels and the intensity of 'Smores' searches, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8232994 and p < 0.01 from 2008 to 2023.

The findings of our research shed light on the peculiar connection between environmental factors and culinary preferences, highlighting the unsuspected influence of air quality on the populace's sweet tooth. As the old adage goes, "Where there's smog, there's s'mores." This study not only underscores the need for further investigation into the interplay of atmospheric conditions and snack cravings, but also serves as a lighthearted reminder of the whimsical intricacies that underlie human behavior.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between environmental factors and human behavior has long been a subject of interest, with researchers exploring the intriguing connections that underlie seemingly unrelated phenomena. In this vein, our study delves into the correlation between air quality in Burlington, Vermont and the virtual hunt for the quintessential campfire treat, 'Smores,' on the internet. While this investigation may initially seem whimsical, our findings reveal compelling insights into the potential influence of air quality on culinary cravings.
The notion of air pollution impacting people's cravings may seem as absurd as a physicist ordering pizza and remarking, "I prefer my pie with extra gravity." Nonetheless, the idea that pollution might stimulate the desire for sweet treats is not as far-fetched as it may seem. Indeed, as we explore the correlation between air quality and 'Smores' searches, we uncover unexpected patterns that prompt reflection on the idiosyncrasies of human behavior.
As we embark on this scientific escapade, it is important to acknowledge the pervasive presence of puns and plays on words in discussing our research. We aim to strike a balance between the gravity of statistical analysis and the levity that such an unconventional research topic naturally invites. As statisticians, we strive to maintain a serious demeanor while analyzing data, yet we cannot resist the occasional pun – after all, we do enjoy a good "snack-tistical analysis." So, join us as we embark on a journey to explore the sweet and smoky intersections of air quality and snack cravings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation between air quality in Burlington, Vermont and Google searches for 'Smores' over the period of 2008 to 2023. The correlation coefficient between these two variables was calculated to be 0.8232994, indicating a strong positive relationship. In statistical terms, this correlation was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.6778220, suggesting that approximately 68% of the variability in 'Smores' searches can be attributed to fluctuations in air quality levels. With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently assert that this relationship is not merely a fluke – unlike the marshmallow that accidentally plunges into the campfire.

Upon analyzing the data, it became evident that as air quality worsened, the frequency of searches for 'Smores' on Google increased correspondingly. This positive correlation points to a potential link between environmental conditions and dessert cravings, as unlikely as it may sound. The notion that a hazy sky could lead to a clamoring for marshmallows and graham crackers may seem as improbable as a mathematician craving "pi" on a daily basis. However, our findings denote a tangible association between air quality and the virtual quest for this gooey campfire confection.

The figure (Fig. 1) further illustrates this significant relationship, portraying a scatterplot that unmistakably depicts the upward trend between air quality levels and 'Smores' searches. As the air quality index levels climb, so too do the searches for this delectable treat. It's akin to watching the confectionary cravings rise up in unison with the smog – a virtual dance of sugar and soot that has captivated the cyber denizens of Burlington.

In conclusion, our research corroborates the unexpected connection between air quality and the virtual hunt for 'Smores,' providing empirical evidence for the age-old adage, "Where there's smog, there's s'mores." This whimsical yet enlightening investigation uncovers the sweet and smoky intersections of environmental conditions and gastronomic proclivities, reminding us that the pursuit of knowledge can be as delicious as a freshly toasted marshmallow.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Burlington, Vermont and Google searches for 'Smores'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Choking on Smog, Craving Smores: Correlating Air Quality in Burlington, Vermont with Google Searches for Sweet Treats"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an analysis of the relationship between air quality in Burlington, Vermont and the frequency of Google searches for 'Smores' over a 15-year period. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team aimed to elucidate the potential impact of air quality on dessert cravings in this picturesque city. Employing statistical methods, we found a remarkably strong positive correlation between air quality index levels and the intensity of 'Smores' searches, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8232994 and p < 0.01 from 2008 to 2023.

The findings of our research shed light on the peculiar connection between environmental factors and culinary preferences, highlighting the unsuspected influence of air quality on the populace's sweet tooth. As the old adage goes, "Where there's smog, there's s'mores." This study not only underscores the need for further investigation into the interplay of atmospheric conditions and snack cravings, but also serves as a lighthearted reminder of the whimsical intricacies that underlie human behavior.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work "The Impact of Air Quality on Human Health," Smith and Doe investigate the deleterious effects of air pollution on respiratory health and overall well-being. While their focus is primarily on the physical ramifications of poor air quality, the authors inadvertently hint at the potential for air pollution to stimulate cravings for confectionary delights. However, it is not until Jones' comprehensive study, "The Urban Environment and Human Behavior," that a direct link between air quality and dessert preferences is hinted at, albeit subtly. The authors find that urban dwellers exhibit unique behavioral patterns in response to environmental stimuli, with potential implications for dietary choices.
In "Atmospheric Science: An Introductory Survey," the authors address the complex interplay of atmospheric conditions and human activities, illuminating the intricate ways in which air quality can influence everyday behaviors. This academic work provides a solid foundation for understanding the potential impact of air quality on culinary inclinations, setting the stage for our investigation into the relationship between air quality in Burlington, Vermont and the widespread yearning for 'Smores' as evidenced by Google searches.
On a more popular level, books such as "The Air We Breathe: A Novel" by Figueroa and "Smores, Murders, and Mysteries: A Culinary Cozy Mystery" by Baker delve into the atmospheric conditions of their respective settings, albeit in different contexts. These works, while fictional, offer a glimpse into the ways in which environmental elements can influence human experiences, leaving readers pondering the potential effects of air quality on their everyday choices, including culinary indulgences.
Admittedly, our exploration of the relationship between air quality in Burlington, Vermont and 'Smores' searches takes a whimsical turn as we draw inspiration not only from scholarly literature but also from animated series and children's shows. "Hey Arnold!" and "The Magic School Bus" both feature episodes that touch on environmental pollution and its effects, illustrating the pervasive influence of air quality on fictional characters and, by extension, on the viewers' perceptions of environmental factors. While these sources may appear lighthearted, they serve to underscore the ubiquitous nature of environmental influences in shaping human behavior, fostering curiosity about the potential impact of air quality on dessert cravings.


[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation between air quality in Burlington, Vermont and Google searches for 'Smores' over the period of 2008 to 2023. The correlation coefficient between these two variables was calculated to be 0.8232994, indicating a strong positive relationship. In statistical terms, this correlation was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.6778220, suggesting that approximately 68% of the variability in 'Smores' searches can be attributed to fluctuations in air quality levels. With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently assert that this relationship is not merely a fluke – unlike the marshmallow that accidentally plunges into the campfire.
Upon analyzing the data, it became evident that as air quality worsened, the frequency of searches for 'Smores' on Google increased correspondingly. This positive correlation points to a potential link between environmental conditions and dessert cravings, as unlikely as it may sound. The notion that a hazy sky could lead to a clamoring for marshmallows and graham crackers may seem as improbable as a mathematician craving "pi" on a daily basis. However, our findings denote a tangible association between air quality and the virtual quest for this gooey campfire confection.
The figure (Fig. 1) further illustrates this significant relationship, portraying a scatterplot that unmistakably depicts the upward trend between air quality levels and 'Smores' searches. As the air quality index levels climb, so too do the searches for this delectable treat. It's akin to watching the confectionary cravings rise up in unison with the smog – a virtual dance of sugar and soot that has captivated the cyber denizens of Burlington.
In conclusion, our research corroborates the unexpected connection between air quality and the virtual hunt for 'Smores,' providing empirical evidence for the age-old adage, "Where there's smog, there's s'mores." This whimsical yet enlightening investigation uncovers the sweet and smoky intersections of environmental conditions and gastronomic proclivities, reminding us that the pursuit of knowledge can be as delicious as a freshly toasted marshmallow.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our analysis of the relationship between air quality in Burlington, Vermont and the frequency of Google searches for 'Smores' has yielded intriguing results that both reaffirm and expand upon existing research. The presence of a strong positive correlation, as indicated by the calculated correlation coefficient of 0.8232994, aligns with and augments the findings of previous studies on the impact of environmental factors on human behavior.

Among the amusing conjectures from our literature review, we found potentially significant implications hidden in the whimsical pages of "Smores, Murders, and Mysteries: A Culinary Cozy Mystery". While the book's primary focus is on solving the fictional culinary murders, it inadvertently reinforces the notion that atmospheric settings can influence not only the plot twists but potentially even the taste buds of the readers.

Leveraging statistical methods, our investigation managed to support the seemingly outlandish notion, put forth in "The Magic School Bus," that environmental pollution transcends mere physical effects and extends to shaping dietary inclinations. This intriguing link between air quality and dessert preferences lends credence to the argument that human behavior may indeed be influenced by the environmental conditions we encounter - a concept that may seem as 'far-fetched' as a marshmallow on a stick over a campfire.

In fact, our findings suggest that approximately 68% of the variability in 'Smores' searches can be attributed to fluctuations in air quality levels. This demonstrates the substantial impact of air quality on the virtual quest for the gooey, chocolatey delight, an impact that could rival the gravitational pull of a black hole on unwary interstellar travelers.

Furthermore, the statistical significance of our results, denoted by a p-value of less than 0.01, provides robust evidence that the relationship between air quality and 'Smores' searches is not mere happenstance - unlike the random discovery of a half-burnt marshmallow in the depths of the fire pit.

In essence, our study showcases the intersection of the cerebral and the culinary, resonating with the dualities found in great comedy - like a well-crafted joke that both entertains and enlightens, our findings underscore the unexpected interplay of environmental elements and human indulgences. This research instigates a profound reevaluation of the profound impacts of our surrounding atmospheres. It opens the doors to a new chapter of scientific inquiry – one where the sweet tooth of humanity meets the smoky haze of our urban landscapes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Burlington, Vermont and Google searches for 'Smores'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Choking on Smog, Craving Smores: Correlating Air Quality in Burlington, Vermont with Google Searches for Sweet Treats"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an analysis of the relationship between air quality in Burlington, Vermont and the frequency of Google searches for 'Smores' over a 15-year period. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team aimed to elucidate the potential impact of air quality on dessert cravings in this picturesque city. Employing statistical methods, we found a remarkably strong positive correlation between air quality index levels and the intensity of 'Smores' searches, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8232994 and p < 0.01 from 2008 to 2023.

The findings of our research shed light on the peculiar connection between environmental factors and culinary preferences, highlighting the unsuspected influence of air quality on the populace's sweet tooth. As the old adage goes, "Where there's smog, there's s'mores." This study not only underscores the need for further investigation into the interplay of atmospheric conditions and snack cravings, but also serves as a lighthearted reminder of the whimsical intricacies that underlie human behavior.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between environmental factors and human behavior has long been a subject of interest, with researchers exploring the intriguing connections that underlie seemingly unrelated phenomena. In this vein, our study delves into the correlation between air quality in Burlington, Vermont and the virtual hunt for the quintessential campfire treat, 'Smores,' on the internet. While this investigation may initially seem whimsical, our findings reveal compelling insights into the potential influence of air quality on culinary cravings.
The notion of air pollution impacting people's cravings may seem as absurd as a physicist ordering pizza and remarking, "I prefer my pie with extra gravity." Nonetheless, the idea that pollution might stimulate the desire for sweet treats is not as far-fetched as it may seem. Indeed, as we explore the correlation between air quality and 'Smores' searches, we uncover unexpected patterns that prompt reflection on the idiosyncrasies of human behavior.
As we embark on this scientific escapade, it is important to acknowledge the pervasive presence of puns and plays on words in discussing our research. We aim to strike a balance between the gravity of statistical analysis and the levity that such an unconventional research topic naturally invites. As statisticians, we strive to maintain a serious demeanor while analyzing data, yet we cannot resist the occasional pun – after all, we do enjoy a good "snack-tistical analysis." So, join us as we embark on a journey to explore the sweet and smoky intersections of air quality and snack cravings.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation between air quality in Burlington, Vermont and Google searches for 'Smores' over the period of 2008 to 2023. The correlation coefficient between these two variables was calculated to be 0.8232994, indicating a strong positive relationship. In statistical terms, this correlation was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.6778220, suggesting that approximately 68% of the variability in 'Smores' searches can be attributed to fluctuations in air quality levels. With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently assert that this relationship is not merely a fluke – unlike the marshmallow that accidentally plunges into the campfire.
Upon analyzing the data, it became evident that as air quality worsened, the frequency of searches for 'Smores' on Google increased correspondingly. This positive correlation points to a potential link between environmental conditions and dessert cravings, as unlikely as it may sound. The notion that a hazy sky could lead to a clamoring for marshmallows and graham crackers may seem as improbable as a mathematician craving "pi" on a daily basis. However, our findings denote a tangible association between air quality and the virtual quest for this gooey campfire confection.
The figure (Fig. 1) further illustrates this significant relationship, portraying a scatterplot that unmistakably depicts the upward trend between air quality levels and 'Smores' searches. As the air quality index levels climb, so too do the searches for this delectable treat. It's akin to watching the confectionary cravings rise up in unison with the smog – a virtual dance of sugar and soot that has captivated the cyber denizens of Burlington.
In conclusion, our research corroborates the unexpected connection between air quality and the virtual hunt for 'Smores,' providing empirical evidence for the age-old adage, "Where there's smog, there's s'mores." This whimsical yet enlightening investigation uncovers the sweet and smoky intersections of environmental conditions and gastronomic proclivities, reminding us that the pursuit of knowledge can be as delicious as a freshly toasted marshmallow.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In closing, our study into the correlation between air quality in Burlington, Vermont and Google searches for 'Smores' has unraveled an unexpected yet tantalizing relationship. The statistical analysis has revealed a strong positive correlation, akin to the irresistible allure of a perfectly roasted marshmallow on a summer's night. As we bid adieu to this peculiar investigation, we cannot help but reflect on the charming idiosyncrasies of human behavior that manifest in the virtual pursuit of sweet indulgences amid the haze of environmental conditions.

While this paper has provided valuable insights into the whimsical connection between air quality and dessert cravings, it is crucial to acknowledge the limitations of our research. Our analysis is confined to correlational findings, and further investigations employing experimental designs may shed additional light on the causal mechanisms underpinning this relationship. Nonetheless, as tempting as it may be to delve deeper, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. Like a well-toasted 'Smores,' this inquiry has reached its delightful and satisfying conclusion.

In parting, we trust that our research has added a sprinkle of sweetness to the scientific discourse and left you with a newfound appreciation for the unforeseen nexus between environmental factors and culinary yearnings. As we embark on our next academic expedition, let us not forget the enlightening whimsy that can be found in the pursuit of knowledge – much like stumbling upon an unexpected stash of graham crackers and chocolate in the midst of a smog-filled campground.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Choking on Smog, Craving Smores: Correlating Air Quality in Burlington, Vermont with Google Searches for Sweet Treats. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Whimsical Environmental Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Choking on Smog, Craving Smores: Correlating Air Quality in Burlington, Vermont with Google Searches for Sweet Treats. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Environmental Sweets and Air Quality (IESAQ)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Choking on Smog, Craving Smores: Correlating Air Quality in Burlington, Vermont with Google Searches for Sweet Treats with an abstract of This paper presents an analysis of the relationship between air quality in Burlington, Vermont and the frequency of Google searches for 'Smores' over a 15-year period. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, our research team aimed to elucidate the potential impact of air quality on dessert cravings in this picturesque city. Employing statistical methods, we found a remarkably strong positive correlation between air quality index levels and the intensity of 'Smores' searches, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8232994 and p < 0.01 from 2008 to 2023.
The findings of our research shed light on the peculiar connection between environmental factors and culinary preferences, highlighting the unsuspected influence of air quality on the populace's sweet tooth. As the old adage goes, "Where there's smog, there's s'mores." This study not only underscores the need for further investigation into the interplay of atmospheric conditions and snack cravings, but also serves as a lighthearted reminder of the whimsical intricacies that underlie human behavior.

ChatGPT:

air quality, Burlington Vermont, Google searches, sweet treats, dessert cravings, environmental factors, air quality index levels, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, atmospheric conditions, snack cravings, human behavior

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air quality in Burlington, Vermont
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with good air quality in Burlington-South Burlington, VT
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air quality in Burlington, Vermont

Google searches for 'Smores'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'Smores' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'Smores'

Correlation r = 0.8232994 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6778220 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 67.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'Smores') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air quality in Burlington, Vermont) over the 16 years from 2008 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.9E-5. 0.0000891429607845523900000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 0.0089% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 11,218 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.55, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Air quality in Burlington, Vermont (Good air quality)79.23582.465881.369980.547988.251483.561687.945287.123395.355293.698688.219291.780891.803389.58993.150784.0659
Google searches for 'Smores' (Rel. search volume)27.583332.083332.833340.416750.2547.25445562.083356.583351.416753.083367.416752.2547.416748.75




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([79.235,82.4658,81.3699,80.5479,88.2514,83.5616,87.9452,87.1233,95.3552,93.6986,88.2192,91.7808,91.8033,89.589,93.1507,84.0659,])
array_2 = np.array([27.5833,32.0833,32.8333,40.4167,50.25,47.25,44,55,62.0833,56.5833,51.4167,53.0833,67.4167,52.25,47.4167,48.75,])
array_1_name = "Air quality in Burlington, Vermont"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'Smores'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 5197 · Black Variable ID: 20397 · Red Variable ID: 1417
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0