about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,130 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the 'first world problems' meme and the second variable is Google searches for 'vihart'.  The chart goes from 2006 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The 'first world problems' meme sparked a wave of interest in trivial, yet relatable issues, priming people to seek out similarly lighthearted content. As a pun-loving mathematician, Vi Hart's unique and quirky approach to math struck a chord with those looking for a prime source of both education and entertainment. It all adds up to a positive correlation between meme popularity and Vi Hart searches – a meme-rable connection, indeed!

Create a meme inspired by the first world problems meme that in some way references Google searches for 'vihart'. Try to emulate the style of the meme - don’t violate the copyright, just make it look and feel like the original meme.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Popularity of the 'first world problems' meme positively influenced vihart (Google searches for 'vihart'). Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
First World Problems: An Analysis of the 'Vihart' Connection

Journal of Irreverent Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9797293 and p < 0.01 for 2006 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"First World Problems: An Analysis of the 'Vihart' Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the correlation between the popularity of the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart'. The study draws on data from Google Trends and applies advanced statistical methods to examine the relationship between these seemingly disparate cultural phenomena. Our research team employed rigorous analysis and found a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9797293, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, for the period from 2006 to 2023. The unexpected link between the 'first world problems' meme and searches for 'vihart' offers intriguing insights that go beyond the surface of internet culture. Our findings provoke contemplation of the interconnectedness of online trends and human behavior, shedding light on the whimsical and often unpredictable nature of digital culture.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"First World Problems: An Analysis of the 'Vihart' Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the correlation between the popularity of the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart'. The study draws on data from Google Trends and applies advanced statistical methods to examine the relationship between these seemingly disparate cultural phenomena. Our research team employed rigorous analysis and found a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9797293, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, for the period from 2006 to 2023. The unexpected link between the 'first world problems' meme and searches for 'vihart' offers intriguing insights that go beyond the surface of internet culture. Our findings provoke contemplation of the interconnectedness of online trends and human behavior, shedding light on the whimsical and often unpredictable nature of digital culture.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

As our digital world continues to evolve and expand, the interconnectedness of online phenomena has become a subject of increasing interest for researchers across various disciplines. In this study, we embark on a curious exploration of the relationship between the popularity of the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart'. While at first glance, these two cultural artifacts may seem unrelated, our investigation reveals a surprising correlation that transcends conventional expectations.

The 'first world problems' meme, often characterized by tongue-in-cheek portrayals of trivial inconveniences experienced in affluent societies, has permeated popular culture in the age of social media. On the other hand, 'vihart' refers to the enigmatic digital persona of a mathemusician known for her captivating educational videos on mathematical concepts and music theory. One may ponder the convergence of these seemingly disparate entities, and our study delves into the statistical nuances to unravel this intriguing association.

Drawing on data from Google Trends, our research team embarked on a meticulously crafted analysis, employing advanced statistical methods to discern patterns within the vast digital landscape. The captious confluence of the 'first world problems' meme and searches for 'vihart' unveils a correlation that surpasses mere happenstance, leading us to question the broader implications of such a seemingly whimsical connection.

In the pursuit of scientific inquiry, we seized upon the task of unraveling this conundrum, buoyed by curiosity and a desire to explore the uncharted terrain of internet culture. The findings of our investigation serve as a testament to the unexpected interplay of digital phenomena, manifesting as a statistical pas de deux between internet humor and mathematical musings.

The overarching objective of this paper is to present our enthralling findings, which not only unearth a remarkable correlation but also challenge prevailing notions of cultural interconnectedness in the digital realm. As we navigate through the labyrinthine depths of internet culture, it becomes clear that beneath the veneer of randomness lies a tapestry of intricate connections waiting to be unveiled.

In the ensuing sections, we shall elucidate the methodological framework, the intricacies of the statistical analyses, and the implications of our befuddling revelations. So, let us embark on this scholarly odyssey, where statistical rigor and digital whimsy converge to shed light on the unforeseen synergy between the 'first world problems' meme and the enigmatic allure of 'vihart'.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"First World Problems: An Analysis of the 'Vihart' Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the correlation between the popularity of the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart'. The study draws on data from Google Trends and applies advanced statistical methods to examine the relationship between these seemingly disparate cultural phenomena. Our research team employed rigorous analysis and found a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9797293, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, for the period from 2006 to 2023. The unexpected link between the 'first world problems' meme and searches for 'vihart' offers intriguing insights that go beyond the surface of internet culture. Our findings provoke contemplation of the interconnectedness of online trends and human behavior, shedding light on the whimsical and often unpredictable nature of digital culture.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
As our digital world continues to evolve and expand, the interconnectedness of online phenomena has become a subject of increasing interest for researchers across various disciplines. In this study, we embark on a curious exploration of the relationship between the popularity of the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart'. While at first glance, these two cultural artifacts may seem unrelated, our investigation reveals a surprising correlation that transcends conventional expectations.
The 'first world problems' meme, often characterized by tongue-in-cheek portrayals of trivial inconveniences experienced in affluent societies, has permeated popular culture in the age of social media. On the other hand, 'vihart' refers to the enigmatic digital persona of a mathemusician known for her captivating educational videos on mathematical concepts and music theory. One may ponder the convergence of these seemingly disparate entities, and our study delves into the statistical nuances to unravel this intriguing association.
Drawing on data from Google Trends, our research team embarked on a meticulously crafted analysis, employing advanced statistical methods to discern patterns within the vast digital landscape. The captious confluence of the 'first world problems' meme and searches for 'vihart' unveils a correlation that surpasses mere happenstance, leading us to question the broader implications of such a seemingly whimsical connection.
In the pursuit of scientific inquiry, we seized upon the task of unraveling this conundrum, buoyed by curiosity and a desire to explore the uncharted terrain of internet culture. The findings of our investigation serve as a testament to the unexpected interplay of digital phenomena, manifesting as a statistical pas de deux between internet humor and mathematical musings.
The overarching objective of this paper is to present our enthralling findings, which not only unearth a remarkable correlation but also challenge prevailing notions of cultural interconnectedness in the digital realm. As we navigate through the labyrinthine depths of internet culture, it becomes clear that beneath the veneer of randomness lies a tapestry of intricate connections waiting to be unveiled.
In the ensuing sections, we shall elucidate the methodological framework, the intricacies of the statistical analyses, and the implications of our befuddling revelations. So, let us embark on this scholarly odyssey, where statistical rigor and digital whimsy converge to shed light on the unforeseen synergy between the 'first world problems' meme and the enigmatic allure of 'vihart'.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find a statistically significant correlation between the popularity of internet memes and related search trends, laying the groundwork for our investigation into the 'first world problems' meme and its unexpected association with searches for 'vihart'. Building upon this foundation, Doe's study on digital culture explores the complex interweaving of seemingly unrelated online phenomena, providing a theoretical backdrop for our examination of the whimsical and enigmatic link between internet humor and mathematical musings.

However, the scholarly landscape surrounding internet culture and its peculiar connections is not solely confined to serious academic studies. Non-fiction works such as "Everything is Illuminated" by Jonathan Safran Foer and "The Tipping Point" by Malcolm Gladwell offer insightful perspectives on the serendipitous intersections of cultural phenomena, hinting at the broader relevance of our investigation. On a fictional note, "Infinite Jest" by David Foster Wallace and "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams, while not directly related to our topic, whimsically illustrate the unpredictability of human behavior and cultural trends, providing a dash of levity amidst our scholarly inquiry.

In a delightful twist, children's television shows such as "Phineas and Ferb" and "Arthur" deftly navigate themes of humor and education, showcasing the enchanting blend of playfulness and intellectual curiosity that mirrors the peculiar fusion of 'first world problems' and 'vihart' in our study. Additionally, the irreverent charm of cartoons like "SpongeBob SquarePants" and "The Simpsons" offers a lighthearted contrast to the intricate statistical analyses underpinning our exploration, infusing a sense of levity into our scholarly pursuit.

Drawing inspiration from this multidimensional literary and cultural milieu, our investigation strides forth, guided by the intricate dance of statistical rigor and digital whimsy, as we unravel the unexpected tapestry of interconnectedness between the ubiquitous 'first world problems' meme and the enigmatic allure of 'vihart'.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Google Trends . You used data from 2006 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"First World Problems: An Analysis of the 'Vihart' Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the correlation between the popularity of the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart'. The study draws on data from Google Trends and applies advanced statistical methods to examine the relationship between these seemingly disparate cultural phenomena. Our research team employed rigorous analysis and found a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9797293, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, for the period from 2006 to 2023. The unexpected link between the 'first world problems' meme and searches for 'vihart' offers intriguing insights that go beyond the surface of internet culture. Our findings provoke contemplation of the interconnectedness of online trends and human behavior, shedding light on the whimsical and often unpredictable nature of digital culture.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
As our digital world continues to evolve and expand, the interconnectedness of online phenomena has become a subject of increasing interest for researchers across various disciplines. In this study, we embark on a curious exploration of the relationship between the popularity of the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart'. While at first glance, these two cultural artifacts may seem unrelated, our investigation reveals a surprising correlation that transcends conventional expectations.
The 'first world problems' meme, often characterized by tongue-in-cheek portrayals of trivial inconveniences experienced in affluent societies, has permeated popular culture in the age of social media. On the other hand, 'vihart' refers to the enigmatic digital persona of a mathemusician known for her captivating educational videos on mathematical concepts and music theory. One may ponder the convergence of these seemingly disparate entities, and our study delves into the statistical nuances to unravel this intriguing association.
Drawing on data from Google Trends, our research team embarked on a meticulously crafted analysis, employing advanced statistical methods to discern patterns within the vast digital landscape. The captious confluence of the 'first world problems' meme and searches for 'vihart' unveils a correlation that surpasses mere happenstance, leading us to question the broader implications of such a seemingly whimsical connection.
In the pursuit of scientific inquiry, we seized upon the task of unraveling this conundrum, buoyed by curiosity and a desire to explore the uncharted terrain of internet culture. The findings of our investigation serve as a testament to the unexpected interplay of digital phenomena, manifesting as a statistical pas de deux between internet humor and mathematical musings.
The overarching objective of this paper is to present our enthralling findings, which not only unearth a remarkable correlation but also challenge prevailing notions of cultural interconnectedness in the digital realm. As we navigate through the labyrinthine depths of internet culture, it becomes clear that beneath the veneer of randomness lies a tapestry of intricate connections waiting to be unveiled.
In the ensuing sections, we shall elucidate the methodological framework, the intricacies of the statistical analyses, and the implications of our befuddling revelations. So, let us embark on this scholarly odyssey, where statistical rigor and digital whimsy converge to shed light on the unforeseen synergy between the 'first world problems' meme and the enigmatic allure of 'vihart'.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

Data Collection and Preprocessing
In our quest to unravel the enigmatic connection between the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart', we embarked on an intrepid journey through the digital realm. Our research team harnessed the formidable power of Google Trends to capture the zeitgeist of internet culture from 2006 to 2023. We scoured the virtual landscape for indications of the 'first world problems' meme and diligently tracked the ebbs and flows of 'vihart' searches, venturing into the murky depths of the world wide web with unwavering resolve.

After amassing a veritable trove of search data, we meticulously sieved through the digital detritus, employing arcane algorithms and incantations to cleanse the dataset of spurious fluctuations and digital flotsam. The resultant dataset, purified of extraneous noise and capricious anomalies, served as the bedrock for our rigorous statistical inquiry.

Statistical Analysis
With our dataset primed for scrutiny, we wielded an array of advanced statistical methods to discern the hidden patterns lurking beneath the veneer of internet culture. The robust correlations and clandestine connections that eluded casual observation were coaxed into the open by our painstaking analyses, underscoring the interplay of whimsy and statistical rigor in this scholarly enterprise.

Among the esoteric incantations we employed, the venerable Pearson correlation coefficient emerged as our stalwart companion, providing a numerical portraiture of the relationship between the 'first world problems' meme and 'vihart' searches. With a keen eye for statistical significance, we deftly navigated the labyrinthine landscape of p-values, unearthing a treasure trove of insight that confounded convention and subverted expectations.

Furthermore, in a daring display of statistical dexterity, we plumbed the depths of time series analysis to unravel the temporal nuances of this curious correlation, peering into the swirling eddies of internet trends with the unblinking gaze of statistical scrutiny.

The unexpected confluence of internet jest and mathematical musings, revealed through our meticulous statistical analyses, serves as a testament to the whimsical interplay of digital phenomena, enveloping our scholarly odyssey in a cloak of enchantment and statistical intrigue.

Ethical Considerations
In our zealous pursuit of digital esoterica, we remained steadfast in our commitment to ethical conduct, ensuring the utmost respect for privacy and data integrity. The digital footprints of internet denizens were handled with reverence and scrupulous care, safeguarding the sanctity of their online meanderings as we charted our course through the fathomless depths of internet culture.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Google Trends .

For the time period 2006 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9797293, r-squared of 0.9598695, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"First World Problems: An Analysis of the 'Vihart' Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the correlation between the popularity of the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart'. The study draws on data from Google Trends and applies advanced statistical methods to examine the relationship between these seemingly disparate cultural phenomena. Our research team employed rigorous analysis and found a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9797293, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, for the period from 2006 to 2023. The unexpected link between the 'first world problems' meme and searches for 'vihart' offers intriguing insights that go beyond the surface of internet culture. Our findings provoke contemplation of the interconnectedness of online trends and human behavior, shedding light on the whimsical and often unpredictable nature of digital culture.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
As our digital world continues to evolve and expand, the interconnectedness of online phenomena has become a subject of increasing interest for researchers across various disciplines. In this study, we embark on a curious exploration of the relationship between the popularity of the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart'. While at first glance, these two cultural artifacts may seem unrelated, our investigation reveals a surprising correlation that transcends conventional expectations.
The 'first world problems' meme, often characterized by tongue-in-cheek portrayals of trivial inconveniences experienced in affluent societies, has permeated popular culture in the age of social media. On the other hand, 'vihart' refers to the enigmatic digital persona of a mathemusician known for her captivating educational videos on mathematical concepts and music theory. One may ponder the convergence of these seemingly disparate entities, and our study delves into the statistical nuances to unravel this intriguing association.
Drawing on data from Google Trends, our research team embarked on a meticulously crafted analysis, employing advanced statistical methods to discern patterns within the vast digital landscape. The captious confluence of the 'first world problems' meme and searches for 'vihart' unveils a correlation that surpasses mere happenstance, leading us to question the broader implications of such a seemingly whimsical connection.
In the pursuit of scientific inquiry, we seized upon the task of unraveling this conundrum, buoyed by curiosity and a desire to explore the uncharted terrain of internet culture. The findings of our investigation serve as a testament to the unexpected interplay of digital phenomena, manifesting as a statistical pas de deux between internet humor and mathematical musings.
The overarching objective of this paper is to present our enthralling findings, which not only unearth a remarkable correlation but also challenge prevailing notions of cultural interconnectedness in the digital realm. As we navigate through the labyrinthine depths of internet culture, it becomes clear that beneath the veneer of randomness lies a tapestry of intricate connections waiting to be unveiled.
In the ensuing sections, we shall elucidate the methodological framework, the intricacies of the statistical analyses, and the implications of our befuddling revelations. So, let us embark on this scholarly odyssey, where statistical rigor and digital whimsy converge to shed light on the unforeseen synergy between the 'first world problems' meme and the enigmatic allure of 'vihart'.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation reveal a remarkably high correlation between the popularity of the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart' over the period from 2006 to 2023. The correlation coefficient calculated was 0.9797293, indicating a strong positive relationship between these divergent cultural phenomena. This finding is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9598695, signifying that approximately 95.99% of the variation in the search volume for 'vihart' can be explained by the popularity of the 'first world problems' meme.

In addition, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, affirming the statistical significance of this relationship. It seems that the internet's penchant for both lighthearted complaints about trivial inconveniences and the pursuit of Vi Hart’s mathemusical insights have a curious synchronicity that defies traditional expectations.

We present in Figure 1 a scatterplot that visually represents this robust correlation between the 'first world problems' meme and 'vihart' searches across the years. The data points align themselves in a harmonious dance, akin to a whimsical ballet of digital intrigue. The unison of these seemingly incongruent entities in the digital ecosystem provides a beguiling spectacle worthy of contemplation.

It is evident from these results that the interconnectedness of internet culture transcends superficial boundaries, bringing together the whimsical humor of 'first world problems' and the intellectual curiosity surrounding 'vihart' in an unexpected pas de deux. These findings raise intriguing questions about the multidimensional nature of online trends and human behavior, painting a portrait of digital culture as a tapestry woven from disparate threads of humor and curiosity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"First World Problems: An Analysis of the 'Vihart' Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the correlation between the popularity of the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart'. The study draws on data from Google Trends and applies advanced statistical methods to examine the relationship between these seemingly disparate cultural phenomena. Our research team employed rigorous analysis and found a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9797293, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, for the period from 2006 to 2023. The unexpected link between the 'first world problems' meme and searches for 'vihart' offers intriguing insights that go beyond the surface of internet culture. Our findings provoke contemplation of the interconnectedness of online trends and human behavior, shedding light on the whimsical and often unpredictable nature of digital culture.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find a statistically significant correlation between the popularity of internet memes and related search trends, laying the groundwork for our investigation into the 'first world problems' meme and its unexpected association with searches for 'vihart'. Building upon this foundation, Doe's study on digital culture explores the complex interweaving of seemingly unrelated online phenomena, providing a theoretical backdrop for our examination of the whimsical and enigmatic link between internet humor and mathematical musings.
However, the scholarly landscape surrounding internet culture and its peculiar connections is not solely confined to serious academic studies. Non-fiction works such as "Everything is Illuminated" by Jonathan Safran Foer and "The Tipping Point" by Malcolm Gladwell offer insightful perspectives on the serendipitous intersections of cultural phenomena, hinting at the broader relevance of our investigation. On a fictional note, "Infinite Jest" by David Foster Wallace and "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams, while not directly related to our topic, whimsically illustrate the unpredictability of human behavior and cultural trends, providing a dash of levity amidst our scholarly inquiry.
In a delightful twist, children's television shows such as "Phineas and Ferb" and "Arthur" deftly navigate themes of humor and education, showcasing the enchanting blend of playfulness and intellectual curiosity that mirrors the peculiar fusion of 'first world problems' and 'vihart' in our study. Additionally, the irreverent charm of cartoons like "SpongeBob SquarePants" and "The Simpsons" offers a lighthearted contrast to the intricate statistical analyses underpinning our exploration, infusing a sense of levity into our scholarly pursuit.
Drawing inspiration from this multidimensional literary and cultural milieu, our investigation strides forth, guided by the intricate dance of statistical rigor and digital whimsy, as we unravel the unexpected tapestry of interconnectedness between the ubiquitous 'first world problems' meme and the enigmatic allure of 'vihart'.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation reveal a remarkably high correlation between the popularity of the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart' over the period from 2006 to 2023. The correlation coefficient calculated was 0.9797293, indicating a strong positive relationship between these divergent cultural phenomena. This finding is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9598695, signifying that approximately 95.99% of the variation in the search volume for 'vihart' can be explained by the popularity of the 'first world problems' meme.
In addition, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, affirming the statistical significance of this relationship. It seems that the internet's penchant for both lighthearted complaints about trivial inconveniences and the pursuit of Vi Hart’s mathemusical insights have a curious synchronicity that defies traditional expectations.
We present in Figure 1 a scatterplot that visually represents this robust correlation between the 'first world problems' meme and 'vihart' searches across the years. The data points align themselves in a harmonious dance, akin to a whimsical ballet of digital intrigue. The unison of these seemingly incongruent entities in the digital ecosystem provides a beguiling spectacle worthy of contemplation.
It is evident from these results that the interconnectedness of internet culture transcends superficial boundaries, bringing together the whimsical humor of 'first world problems' and the intellectual curiosity surrounding 'vihart' in an unexpected pas de deux. These findings raise intriguing questions about the multidimensional nature of online trends and human behavior, painting a portrait of digital culture as a tapestry woven from disparate threads of humor and curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The enthralling juxtaposition of the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart' has left our research team captivated by the enigmatic interplay of internet culture. Our findings not only align with prior research on interconnected online phenomena but also add a whimsical twist to the scientific discourse, reminiscent of the unexpected plot twists in Douglas Adams' "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy." The remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9797293 mirrors the precision of a well-crafted mathematical equation, showcasing the intricate relationship between twee internet humor and the pursuit of Vi Hart's mathemusical musings.

Our results parallel the serendipitous intersections highlighted in Malcolm Gladwell's "The Tipping Point," painting a vivid picture of how seemingly unrelated cultural phenomena can converge in the digital sphere. The statistical robustness of our findings, echoed in the whimsical charm of "Phineas and Ferb's" playful exploration of knowledge, underscores the multifaceted nature of our investigation.

The r-squared value of 0.9598695, like a sagacious sage, imparts wisdom about the pervasiveness of the 'first world problems' meme in driving searches for 'vihart.' This statistical prowess harmonizes with the poignant insights found in Jonathan Safran Foer's "Everything is Illuminated," illuminating the interconnectedness of our digital landscape.

Furthermore, the scatterplot in Figure 1, akin to a visual symphony of whimsy, showcases the harmonious dance of the 'first world problems' meme and 'vihart' searches, inviting contemplation akin to the elegant mathematical choreography Vi Hart herself might appreciate.

In unraveling the unexpected tapestry of interconnectedness, our investigation has not only showcased the whimsical ballet of digital intrigue but has also raised novel questions about the complex dynamics at play within online culture. Our inquiry serves as a whimsical yet rigorous exploration, uncovering the unexpected correlations that underpin the digital ecosystem, akin to a delightful Easter egg hidden in the fabric of the internet's rich tapestry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"First World Problems: An Analysis of the 'Vihart' Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the correlation between the popularity of the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart'. The study draws on data from Google Trends and applies advanced statistical methods to examine the relationship between these seemingly disparate cultural phenomena. Our research team employed rigorous analysis and found a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9797293, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, for the period from 2006 to 2023. The unexpected link between the 'first world problems' meme and searches for 'vihart' offers intriguing insights that go beyond the surface of internet culture. Our findings provoke contemplation of the interconnectedness of online trends and human behavior, shedding light on the whimsical and often unpredictable nature of digital culture.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
As our digital world continues to evolve and expand, the interconnectedness of online phenomena has become a subject of increasing interest for researchers across various disciplines. In this study, we embark on a curious exploration of the relationship between the popularity of the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart'. While at first glance, these two cultural artifacts may seem unrelated, our investigation reveals a surprising correlation that transcends conventional expectations.
The 'first world problems' meme, often characterized by tongue-in-cheek portrayals of trivial inconveniences experienced in affluent societies, has permeated popular culture in the age of social media. On the other hand, 'vihart' refers to the enigmatic digital persona of a mathemusician known for her captivating educational videos on mathematical concepts and music theory. One may ponder the convergence of these seemingly disparate entities, and our study delves into the statistical nuances to unravel this intriguing association.
Drawing on data from Google Trends, our research team embarked on a meticulously crafted analysis, employing advanced statistical methods to discern patterns within the vast digital landscape. The captious confluence of the 'first world problems' meme and searches for 'vihart' unveils a correlation that surpasses mere happenstance, leading us to question the broader implications of such a seemingly whimsical connection.
In the pursuit of scientific inquiry, we seized upon the task of unraveling this conundrum, buoyed by curiosity and a desire to explore the uncharted terrain of internet culture. The findings of our investigation serve as a testament to the unexpected interplay of digital phenomena, manifesting as a statistical pas de deux between internet humor and mathematical musings.
The overarching objective of this paper is to present our enthralling findings, which not only unearth a remarkable correlation but also challenge prevailing notions of cultural interconnectedness in the digital realm. As we navigate through the labyrinthine depths of internet culture, it becomes clear that beneath the veneer of randomness lies a tapestry of intricate connections waiting to be unveiled.
In the ensuing sections, we shall elucidate the methodological framework, the intricacies of the statistical analyses, and the implications of our befuddling revelations. So, let us embark on this scholarly odyssey, where statistical rigor and digital whimsy converge to shed light on the unforeseen synergy between the 'first world problems' meme and the enigmatic allure of 'vihart'.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation reveal a remarkably high correlation between the popularity of the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart' over the period from 2006 to 2023. The correlation coefficient calculated was 0.9797293, indicating a strong positive relationship between these divergent cultural phenomena. This finding is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9598695, signifying that approximately 95.99% of the variation in the search volume for 'vihart' can be explained by the popularity of the 'first world problems' meme.
In addition, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, affirming the statistical significance of this relationship. It seems that the internet's penchant for both lighthearted complaints about trivial inconveniences and the pursuit of Vi Hart’s mathemusical insights have a curious synchronicity that defies traditional expectations.
We present in Figure 1 a scatterplot that visually represents this robust correlation between the 'first world problems' meme and 'vihart' searches across the years. The data points align themselves in a harmonious dance, akin to a whimsical ballet of digital intrigue. The unison of these seemingly incongruent entities in the digital ecosystem provides a beguiling spectacle worthy of contemplation.
It is evident from these results that the interconnectedness of internet culture transcends superficial boundaries, bringing together the whimsical humor of 'first world problems' and the intellectual curiosity surrounding 'vihart' in an unexpected pas de deux. These findings raise intriguing questions about the multidimensional nature of online trends and human behavior, painting a portrait of digital culture as a tapestry woven from disparate threads of humor and curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unraveled a surprising and robust correlation between the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart'. Our findings illuminate the intricate interplay between seemingly divergent online phenomena, underscoring the whimsical and often unpredictable nature of digital culture. The statistical analysis has affirmed a strong positive relationship, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9797293, suggesting that these cultural touchstones dance together in a digital ballet of unexpected synchronicity.

The unexpected link between trivial lighthearted complaints and the pursuit of mathemusical enlightenment hints at a playful yet profound undercurrent in the digital realm. The statistical significance we have uncovered challenges conventional boundaries of cultural interconnectedness, inviting contemplation of the mysterious affinities that underpin internet trends. With an r-squared value of 0.9598695 affirming that the majority of the variation in 'vihart' searches can be explained by 'first world problems' memes, our findings emphasize the remarkable cohesion between these disparate entities.

As we reflect on this enthralling pas de deux of internet culture, it becomes apparent that the digital ecosystem is a stage for the most unexpected pairings. From delightfully trivial complaints to the pursuit of mathematical and musical enlightenment, the boundless expanse of online culture unfurls a tapestry of connections waiting to be unveiled. We must acknowledge that the correlation does not imply causation, but it does suggest a harmonious resonance between online whimsy and intellectual curiosity.

In light of our findings, we assert that no further research is necessary in this area. Clearly, the interconnectedness of digital phenomena knows no bounds, and our scholarly odyssey has led to the unearthing of a correlation that transcends expectations. The curtain draws on this statistical entertainment, but the spark of curiosity lingers, inviting further exploration into the idiosyncrasies of internet culture.

In the words of Vi Hart herself, "Let the mathematics and musings of the digital realm continue to surprise and inspire, for in the whimsy of online interplay, there lies an endless fount of digital delight."

So, let us bid adieu to this statistical soirée and embrace the enigmatic dance of internet culture, where the unexpected stirs the soul of inquiry and curiosity.

And with that, we close the chapter on this scholarly saga, leaving the winding paths of internet culture to unravel in their whimsical glory. Cheers to the serendipitous insights that reveal themselves as we navigate the digital labyrinth!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited First World Problems: An Analysis of the 'Vihart' Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Irreverent Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited First World Problems: An Analysis of the 'Vihart' Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for the Advancement of Quirky Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled First World Problems: An Analysis of the 'Vihart' Connection with an abstract of This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the correlation between the popularity of the 'first world problems' meme and Google searches for 'vihart'. The study draws on data from Google Trends and applies advanced statistical methods to examine the relationship between these seemingly disparate cultural phenomena. Our research team employed rigorous analysis and found a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9797293, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, for the period from 2006 to 2023. The unexpected link between the 'first world problems' meme and searches for 'vihart' offers intriguing insights that go beyond the surface of internet culture. Our findings provoke contemplation of the interconnectedness of online trends and human behavior, shedding light on the whimsical and often unpredictable nature of digital culture.

ChatGPT:

First world problems, vihart, meme, Google searches, correlation coefficient, statistical methods, Google Trends, cultural phenomena

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the 'first world problems' meme
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'first world problems' (without quotes, in the United States)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.

See what else correlates with Popularity of the 'first world problems' meme

Google searches for 'vihart'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'vihart' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'vihart'

Correlation r = 0.9797293 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9598695 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 96% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'vihart') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the 'first world problems' meme) over the 18 years from 2006 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.3E-12. 0.0000000000013451888943219692
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 1.3E-10% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 743,390,020,703 random variables You don't actually need 743 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.95, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Popularity of the 'first world problems' meme (Relative popularity)10.3750.36363611.5454531.916755.833350.833334.2521.515.666714.083311.08339.0833386.833338.833339.91667
Google searches for 'vihart' (Rel. search volume)2.2513.666671.52.4166719.416738.333342.666728.66671813.3333119.583336.833335.083333.254.253.44444




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1,0.375,0.363636,1,1.54545,31.9167,55.8333,50.8333,34.25,21.5,15.6667,14.0833,11.0833,9.08333,8,6.83333,8.83333,9.91667,])
array_2 = np.array([2.25,1,3.66667,1.5,2.41667,19.4167,38.3333,42.6667,28.6667,18,13.3333,11,9.58333,6.83333,5.08333,3.25,4.25,3.44444,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the 'first world problems' meme"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'vihart'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 5130 · Black Variable ID: 25137 · Red Variable ID: 1492
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0