about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,118 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and the second variable is Total length of minutephysics YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As GMO use decreased in North Dakota corn, it led to a shortage of corny jokes. Without a steady supply of punny inspiration, minutephysics had to shorten their videos to avoid a kernel of humor repetition. This left viewers cob-fused as they couldn't ear-resist the shorter content, creating a maize of mixed emotions. The lack of GMOs in North Dakota corn literally stalked the length of minutephysics videos, shucking off valuable seconds and leaving fans saying, "Aw, shucks!"

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image that resembles a Polaroid photo depicting a North Dakota cornfield. In this cornfield, genetically modified corn slowly transforms into its non-GMO counterpart. As the transformation occurs, the once plentiful crop of corny jokes dwindles. In the background, the minutes on the minutephysics YouTube videos visibly shrink, reflecting the reduced length. Capture the bewildered maze of emotions on the faces of the viewers as they experience confusion and disappointment due to the absence of GMOs impacting the content they have grown accustomed to. Strive to evoke a sense of transformation and emotional shift through this simple yet powerful visual depiction. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Total length of minutephysics YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: 3D Pixar Style a Polaroid photo 3D Pixar Style Macabre Cubism
ChatGPT: a Polaroid photo

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Total length of minutephysics YouTube videos, in the following situation: As GMO use decreased in North Dakota corn, it led to a shortage of corny jokes. Without a steady supply of punny inspiration, minutephysics had to shorten their videos to avoid a kernel of humor repetition. This left viewers cob-fused as they couldn't ear-resist the shorter content, creating a maize of mixed emotions. The lack of GMOs in North Dakota corn literally stalked the length of minutephysics videos, shucking off valuable seconds and leaving fans saying, "Aw, shucks!". Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a North Dakota cornfield, the genetically modified corn slowly transforms into its non-GMO counterpart, as the once plentiful crop of corny jokes dwindles. Meanwhile, the minutes on the minutephysics YouTube videos visibly shrink, reflecting the reduced length. Viewers are left in a bewildered maze of emotions, with a sense of confusion and disappointment, as the absence of GMOs directly impacts the content they have grown accustomed to.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a Polaroid photo ] and depicting this scene: In a North Dakota cornfield, the genetically modified corn slowly transforms into its non-GMO counterpart, as the once plentiful crop of corny jokes dwindles. Meanwhile, the minutes on the minutephysics YouTube videos visibly shrink, reflecting the reduced length. Viewers are left in a bewildered maze of emotions, with a sense of confusion and disappointment, as the absence of GMOs directly impacts the content they have grown accustomed to. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image that resembles a Polaroid photo depicting a North Dakota cornfield. In this cornfield, genetically modified corn slowly transforms into its non-GMO counterpart. As the transformation occurs, the once plentiful crop of corny jokes dwindles. In the background, the minutes on the minutephysics YouTube videos visibly shrink, reflecting the reduced length. Capture the bewildered maze of emotions on the faces of the viewers as they experience confusion and disappointment due to the absence of GMOs impacting the content they have grown accustomed to. Strive to evoke a sense of transformation and emotional shift through this simple yet powerful visual depiction.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota caused Total length of minutephysics YouTube videos to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
GMOs in the Great Plains: Grasping the Gargantuan Growth of YouTube Videos by minutephysics

Journal of Agriculture and New Media Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Total length of minutephysics YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from USDA and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8035369 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
GMOs in the Great Plains: Grasping the Gargantuan Growth of YouTube Videos by minutephysics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in North Dakota and the total length of minutephysics YouTube videos. We sourced data from the USDA for GMO corn acreage in North Dakota and data from YouTube for the total length of minutephysics videos from 2011 to 2023. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8035369 and a p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest that there may be a peculiar connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the duration of the popular science videos by minutephysics. This study not only sheds light on the interaction between agricultural practices and internet content creation but also adds a delightful layer of humor and intrigue to the world of scientific research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Total length of minutephysics YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMOs in the Great Plains: Grasping the Gargantuan Growth of YouTube Videos by minutephysics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in North Dakota and the total length of minutephysics YouTube videos. We sourced data from the USDA for GMO corn acreage in North Dakota and data from YouTube for the total length of minutephysics videos from 2011 to 2023. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8035369 and a p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest that there may be a peculiar connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the duration of the popular science videos by minutephysics. This study not only sheds light on the interaction between agricultural practices and internet content creation but also adds a delightful layer of humor and intrigue to the world of scientific research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the internet expands its presence in our daily lives, it offers an assortment of entertainment and educational content, from viral cat videos to instructive tutorials. Among these, minutephysics has become a staple for those seeking to grasp the complex yet captivating world of physics in, as the name suggests, a minute or less. At the same time, the controversial topic of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has been ingrained in modern agricultural practices, sparking debates on their impacts and safety.

In a whimsically unexpected linkage, this study ventures into the domain where GMOs meet YouTube physics, aiming to explore the enigmatic correlation between the use of GMOs in corn cultivated in North Dakota and the total length of minutephysics videos. It's as if the GMOs are conducting their own "experiment" on the length of these videos, hoping for a favorable outcome and a bountiful harvest of views.

Inquisitively, one might wonder how an agricultural practice could possibly influence the length of online scientific demonstrations. Yet, as we delve into the data, a compelling association begins to emerge, hinting at a potential link that is as engaging and befuddling as a physics paradox.

We embark on this unconventional quest not only to uncover the statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate domains but also to infuse a delightful touch of whimsy and wonder into the realm of scientific inquiry. After all, who knew that the humble cornfield in North Dakota could hold secrets that resonate with the digital intricacies of YouTube content creation?

Intriguing and puzzling in equal measure, the convergence of GMOs and minutephysics videos promises to offer an unparalleled insight that will both entertain and educate, much like the content in question. So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a journey through the physics of GMOs and YouTube, where science meets statistical tomfoolery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Total length of minutephysics YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMOs in the Great Plains: Grasping the Gargantuan Growth of YouTube Videos by minutephysics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in North Dakota and the total length of minutephysics YouTube videos. We sourced data from the USDA for GMO corn acreage in North Dakota and data from YouTube for the total length of minutephysics videos from 2011 to 2023. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8035369 and a p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest that there may be a peculiar connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the duration of the popular science videos by minutephysics. This study not only sheds light on the interaction between agricultural practices and internet content creation but also adds a delightful layer of humor and intrigue to the world of scientific research.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the internet expands its presence in our daily lives, it offers an assortment of entertainment and educational content, from viral cat videos to instructive tutorials. Among these, minutephysics has become a staple for those seeking to grasp the complex yet captivating world of physics in, as the name suggests, a minute or less. At the same time, the controversial topic of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has been ingrained in modern agricultural practices, sparking debates on their impacts and safety.
In a whimsically unexpected linkage, this study ventures into the domain where GMOs meet YouTube physics, aiming to explore the enigmatic correlation between the use of GMOs in corn cultivated in North Dakota and the total length of minutephysics videos. It's as if the GMOs are conducting their own "experiment" on the length of these videos, hoping for a favorable outcome and a bountiful harvest of views.
Inquisitively, one might wonder how an agricultural practice could possibly influence the length of online scientific demonstrations. Yet, as we delve into the data, a compelling association begins to emerge, hinting at a potential link that is as engaging and befuddling as a physics paradox.
We embark on this unconventional quest not only to uncover the statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate domains but also to infuse a delightful touch of whimsy and wonder into the realm of scientific inquiry. After all, who knew that the humble cornfield in North Dakota could hold secrets that resonate with the digital intricacies of YouTube content creation?
Intriguing and puzzling in equal measure, the convergence of GMOs and minutephysics videos promises to offer an unparalleled insight that will both entertain and educate, much like the content in question. So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a journey through the physics of GMOs and YouTube, where science meets statistical tomfoolery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The authors sifted through an array of scholarly articles to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivated in North Dakota and the total length of minutephysics YouTube videos. In "Smith et al.," the researchers outlined the agricultural implications of GMO corn cultivation, providing a comprehensive analysis of its environmental and economic impacts. In a study by Doe, the effects of GMOs on crop yield and pesticide use were scrutinized, offering a nuanced perspective on the contentious subject. Jones, in their seminal work, investigated the consumer perceptions of GMO products, shedding light on the public sentiment towards genetically modified crops.

However, as we ventured deeper into the literature, we stumbled upon unexpected sources that peered into the whimsical and absurd. "The GMO Diaries" by Lorem chronicled the exploits of a corn crop imbued with extraordinary powers, delving into the surreal world of genetically modified organisms and their improbable escapades. Likewise, "Cracking the Kernel" by Ipsum delved into the clandestine world of GMO corn, where kernels harbor obscure secrets that transcend the boundaries of conventional agriculture.

As we delved further into the literary maze, we encountered fiction books that seemed to hover on the periphery of relevance. "Corn and Physics: A Love Story" by J.K. Cornling appeared to offer a curious juxtaposition of agricultural musings and physics wonders, blurring the lines between reality and whimsy. Similarly, "The Quantum Maize" by R. Corn Bradbury wove a narrative that fused the enigmatic world of quantum physics with the humble cornfield, leading the reader on an ethereal journey through fields of scientific intrigue.

In an unexpected turn, we uncovered movies that danced on the fringes of our research landscape. "The Corn Ultimatum," a riveting thriller that explored the ramifications of genetically modified corn on a global scale, echoed the magnitude of our investigation. Additionally, "A Beautiful Mind" drew parallels to our study with its intricate portrayal of mathematical prowess and intellectual depth, mirroring the complexity we sought to navigate in our investigation.

The exploration of these tangential literary and cinematic works not only added a layer of humor and levity to our literature review but also underscored the unconventional and captivating nature of our research subject. As we transition to the empirical findings, let us embark on a whimsical odyssey through the cornfields of North Dakota and the captivating world of minutephysics, where science meets statistical serendipity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Total length of minutephysics YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and YouTube . You used data from 2011 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMOs in the Great Plains: Grasping the Gargantuan Growth of YouTube Videos by minutephysics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in North Dakota and the total length of minutephysics YouTube videos. We sourced data from the USDA for GMO corn acreage in North Dakota and data from YouTube for the total length of minutephysics videos from 2011 to 2023. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8035369 and a p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest that there may be a peculiar connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the duration of the popular science videos by minutephysics. This study not only sheds light on the interaction between agricultural practices and internet content creation but also adds a delightful layer of humor and intrigue to the world of scientific research.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the internet expands its presence in our daily lives, it offers an assortment of entertainment and educational content, from viral cat videos to instructive tutorials. Among these, minutephysics has become a staple for those seeking to grasp the complex yet captivating world of physics in, as the name suggests, a minute or less. At the same time, the controversial topic of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has been ingrained in modern agricultural practices, sparking debates on their impacts and safety.
In a whimsically unexpected linkage, this study ventures into the domain where GMOs meet YouTube physics, aiming to explore the enigmatic correlation between the use of GMOs in corn cultivated in North Dakota and the total length of minutephysics videos. It's as if the GMOs are conducting their own "experiment" on the length of these videos, hoping for a favorable outcome and a bountiful harvest of views.
Inquisitively, one might wonder how an agricultural practice could possibly influence the length of online scientific demonstrations. Yet, as we delve into the data, a compelling association begins to emerge, hinting at a potential link that is as engaging and befuddling as a physics paradox.
We embark on this unconventional quest not only to uncover the statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate domains but also to infuse a delightful touch of whimsy and wonder into the realm of scientific inquiry. After all, who knew that the humble cornfield in North Dakota could hold secrets that resonate with the digital intricacies of YouTube content creation?
Intriguing and puzzling in equal measure, the convergence of GMOs and minutephysics videos promises to offer an unparalleled insight that will both entertain and educate, much like the content in question. So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a journey through the physics of GMOs and YouTube, where science meets statistical tomfoolery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the mysterious relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the cornfields of North Dakota and the total length of minutephysics YouTube videos, our research team embarked on a zany adventure through statistical analysis and data sleuthing. We scoured the vast plains of the internet, utilizing information from the authoritative source of agricultural statistics, the USDA, and the virtual haven of science enthusiasts and curious minds, YouTube.

First, we wrangled data on GMO corn acreage in North Dakota from 2011 to 2023, harnessing the agricultural insights provided by the USDA. We harvested a bumper crop of information, ripe with numbers that encapsulate the growth of GMO corn and the peculiarities of its cultivation in the heart of the Great Plains.

Next, we delved into the digital realm of minutephysics videos, culminating in a mammoth excavation of data on the total length of these educational nuggets from 2011 to 2023. The YouTube platform proved to be a trove of quantitative quirkiness, where the duration of videos takes quantum leaps from mere minutes to substantial time spans that rival full-length feature films.

Amidst this chaotic plethora of numbers and statistics, we deployed an eclectic blend of statistical techniques to decipher the perplexing relationship between GMO corn and minutephysics videos. Our analytical toolbox included a hearty serving of correlation analysis to assess the degree of association between these seemingly incongruous elements. The robustness of this statistical undertaking was further amplified by a jaunty regression analysis, allowing us to unravel the potential influence of GMO corn on the length of minutephysics videos.

As we sifted through the data and marched through the quirky landscape of statistical exploration, we kept a vigilant eye out for any lurking anomalies or outliers that sought to disrupt the jocular harmony of our findings. With great care and precision, we wove together the threads of agricultural and online content data, creating a vibrant tapestry of statistical intrigue and whimsy.

In this merry pursuit of scientific investigation, we ventured forth, armed with statistical rigor and a hefty dose of lighthearted curiosity. Our methodology was a delightful fusion of serious statistical analysis and investigative playfulness, akin to a tango between academia and amusement. Embarking on this comical odyssey, we aimed to unveil the enigmatic connection between the growth of GMO corn and the length of minutephysics videos, infusing the realm of scientific inquiry with laughter and levity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Total length of minutephysics YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and YouTube .

For the time period 2011 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8035369, r-squared of 0.6456715, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMOs in the Great Plains: Grasping the Gargantuan Growth of YouTube Videos by minutephysics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in North Dakota and the total length of minutephysics YouTube videos. We sourced data from the USDA for GMO corn acreage in North Dakota and data from YouTube for the total length of minutephysics videos from 2011 to 2023. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8035369 and a p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest that there may be a peculiar connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the duration of the popular science videos by minutephysics. This study not only sheds light on the interaction between agricultural practices and internet content creation but also adds a delightful layer of humor and intrigue to the world of scientific research.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the internet expands its presence in our daily lives, it offers an assortment of entertainment and educational content, from viral cat videos to instructive tutorials. Among these, minutephysics has become a staple for those seeking to grasp the complex yet captivating world of physics in, as the name suggests, a minute or less. At the same time, the controversial topic of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has been ingrained in modern agricultural practices, sparking debates on their impacts and safety.
In a whimsically unexpected linkage, this study ventures into the domain where GMOs meet YouTube physics, aiming to explore the enigmatic correlation between the use of GMOs in corn cultivated in North Dakota and the total length of minutephysics videos. It's as if the GMOs are conducting their own "experiment" on the length of these videos, hoping for a favorable outcome and a bountiful harvest of views.
Inquisitively, one might wonder how an agricultural practice could possibly influence the length of online scientific demonstrations. Yet, as we delve into the data, a compelling association begins to emerge, hinting at a potential link that is as engaging and befuddling as a physics paradox.
We embark on this unconventional quest not only to uncover the statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate domains but also to infuse a delightful touch of whimsy and wonder into the realm of scientific inquiry. After all, who knew that the humble cornfield in North Dakota could hold secrets that resonate with the digital intricacies of YouTube content creation?
Intriguing and puzzling in equal measure, the convergence of GMOs and minutephysics videos promises to offer an unparalleled insight that will both entertain and educate, much like the content in question. So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a journey through the physics of GMOs and YouTube, where science meets statistical tomfoolery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our study revealed a statistically significant correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in North Dakota and the total length of minutephysics YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient of 0.8035369 implies a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. It appears that GMOs may have more influence over YouTube video lengths than we ever imagined, perhaps whispering captivating content ideas to the creators late into the night.

With an r-squared value of 0.6456715, we found that approximately 64.57% of the variability in the length of minutephysics videos could be explained by the variation in GMO corn acreage in North Dakota. It's as if the cornfields are encouraging the minutephysics team to craft longer, more elaborate videos, akin to the sprawling and complex root systems beneath the soil.

The significance level (p < 0.01) further reinforces the strength of the relationship we uncovered. It's pretty safe to say that this correlation is about as solid as the GMO corn stalks swaying in the North Dakota breeze.

In Figure 1, we display a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the robust correlation between GMO corn acreage in North Dakota and the total length of minutephysics videos. The data points align themselves with a sense of purpose, as if the GMOs and minutephysics videos are engaged in an unexpected dance of statistical synchronicity.

These findings challenge our preconceptions about the influence of agricultural practices on internet content creation. Who would have thought that the very cornfields of North Dakota could hold such sway over the duration of our favorite science videos? It seems that GMOs may not only be altering the genetic makeup of corn but also the fabric of online science education in their own peculiar way.

In conclusion, our research divulges an intriguing connection between GMOs and minutephysics YouTube videos, urging us to view both agriculture and internet content creation through a lens of statistical whimsy. This unexpected bond between corn and YouTube promises to stimulate further research, inviting scholars to delve deeper into the fascinating and, dare we say, corny relationship between agricultural practices and digital content production.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Total length of minutephysics YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
GMOs in the Great Plains: Grasping the Gargantuan Growth of YouTube Videos by minutephysics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in North Dakota and the total length of minutephysics YouTube videos. We sourced data from the USDA for GMO corn acreage in North Dakota and data from YouTube for the total length of minutephysics videos from 2011 to 2023. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8035369 and a p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest that there may be a peculiar connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the duration of the popular science videos by minutephysics. This study not only sheds light on the interaction between agricultural practices and internet content creation but also adds a delightful layer of humor and intrigue to the world of scientific research.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The authors sifted through an array of scholarly articles to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivated in North Dakota and the total length of minutephysics YouTube videos. In "Smith et al.," the researchers outlined the agricultural implications of GMO corn cultivation, providing a comprehensive analysis of its environmental and economic impacts. In a study by Doe, the effects of GMOs on crop yield and pesticide use were scrutinized, offering a nuanced perspective on the contentious subject. Jones, in their seminal work, investigated the consumer perceptions of GMO products, shedding light on the public sentiment towards genetically modified crops.
However, as we ventured deeper into the literature, we stumbled upon unexpected sources that peered into the whimsical and absurd. "The GMO Diaries" by Lorem chronicled the exploits of a corn crop imbued with extraordinary powers, delving into the surreal world of genetically modified organisms and their improbable escapades. Likewise, "Cracking the Kernel" by Ipsum delved into the clandestine world of GMO corn, where kernels harbor obscure secrets that transcend the boundaries of conventional agriculture.
As we delved further into the literary maze, we encountered fiction books that seemed to hover on the periphery of relevance. "Corn and Physics: A Love Story" by J.K. Cornling appeared to offer a curious juxtaposition of agricultural musings and physics wonders, blurring the lines between reality and whimsy. Similarly, "The Quantum Maize" by R. Corn Bradbury wove a narrative that fused the enigmatic world of quantum physics with the humble cornfield, leading the reader on an ethereal journey through fields of scientific intrigue.
In an unexpected turn, we uncovered movies that danced on the fringes of our research landscape. "The Corn Ultimatum," a riveting thriller that explored the ramifications of genetically modified corn on a global scale, echoed the magnitude of our investigation. Additionally, "A Beautiful Mind" drew parallels to our study with its intricate portrayal of mathematical prowess and intellectual depth, mirroring the complexity we sought to navigate in our investigation.
The exploration of these tangential literary and cinematic works not only added a layer of humor and levity to our literature review but also underscored the unconventional and captivating nature of our research subject. As we transition to the empirical findings, let us embark on a whimsical odyssey through the cornfields of North Dakota and the captivating world of minutephysics, where science meets statistical serendipity.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study revealed a statistically significant correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in North Dakota and the total length of minutephysics YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient of 0.8035369 implies a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. It appears that GMOs may have more influence over YouTube video lengths than we ever imagined, perhaps whispering captivating content ideas to the creators late into the night.
With an r-squared value of 0.6456715, we found that approximately 64.57% of the variability in the length of minutephysics videos could be explained by the variation in GMO corn acreage in North Dakota. It's as if the cornfields are encouraging the minutephysics team to craft longer, more elaborate videos, akin to the sprawling and complex root systems beneath the soil.
The significance level (p < 0.01) further reinforces the strength of the relationship we uncovered. It's pretty safe to say that this correlation is about as solid as the GMO corn stalks swaying in the North Dakota breeze.
In Figure 1, we display a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the robust correlation between GMO corn acreage in North Dakota and the total length of minutephysics videos. The data points align themselves with a sense of purpose, as if the GMOs and minutephysics videos are engaged in an unexpected dance of statistical synchronicity.
These findings challenge our preconceptions about the influence of agricultural practices on internet content creation. Who would have thought that the very cornfields of North Dakota could hold such sway over the duration of our favorite science videos? It seems that GMOs may not only be altering the genetic makeup of corn but also the fabric of online science education in their own peculiar way.
In conclusion, our research divulges an intriguing connection between GMOs and minutephysics YouTube videos, urging us to view both agriculture and internet content creation through a lens of statistical whimsy. This unexpected bond between corn and YouTube promises to stimulate further research, inviting scholars to delve deeper into the fascinating and, dare we say, corny relationship between agricultural practices and digital content production.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation uncover a cornucopia of statistical intrigue, hinting at a captivating connection between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in North Dakota and the production of minutephysics YouTube videos. The pronounced correlation coefficient of 0.8035369 presents a compelling case, suggesting that the very essence of GMO corn may be intertwined with the creative fabric of minutephysics content. It seems as though the GMO-imbued cornfields are silently urging the minutephysics team to unfurl lengthier, more engrossing videos, reminiscent of the luxuriant growth spurred by agricultural ingenuity.

Our findings not only corroborate the prior research by Smith et al. and Doe, which delved into the agricultural implications of GMOs and their effects on crop yield, but also shed light on the whimsical discoveries made in "The GMO Diaries" and "Cracking the Kernel." The obscure powers and clandestine secrets attributed to GMO corn in these literary works have perhaps foreshadowed the unanticipated influence of GMOs on digital content creation that we've unveiled. Moreover, the unexpected insights gained from "Corn and Physics: A Love Story" and "The Quantum Maize" assume an unexpected relevance, hinting at the improbable intersection of agriculture and internet science education.

Our peculiar correlations echo the fanciful themes found in "The Corn Ultimatum" and "A Beautiful Mind," as the statistical dance between GMOs and minutephysics videos defies conventional scientific boundaries and beckons us into a realm of statistical serendipity. It's as if the intricacies of GMO corn have been whispering esoteric content ideas to the minutephysics creators, resulting in a symphony of digital debate and discovery.

While our findings may initially elicit a chuckle, they offer a tantalizing glimpse into the lighthearted yet captivating relationship between agriculture and online scientific discourse. As we contemplate the implications of our statistical serendipity, we invite fellow scholars to join us in this whimsical odyssey through the cornfields of North Dakota and the multifaceted world of minutephysics, where empirical rigidity meets statistical irreverence.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Total length of minutephysics YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
GMOs in the Great Plains: Grasping the Gargantuan Growth of YouTube Videos by minutephysics

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in North Dakota and the total length of minutephysics YouTube videos. We sourced data from the USDA for GMO corn acreage in North Dakota and data from YouTube for the total length of minutephysics videos from 2011 to 2023. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8035369 and a p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest that there may be a peculiar connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the duration of the popular science videos by minutephysics. This study not only sheds light on the interaction between agricultural practices and internet content creation but also adds a delightful layer of humor and intrigue to the world of scientific research.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the internet expands its presence in our daily lives, it offers an assortment of entertainment and educational content, from viral cat videos to instructive tutorials. Among these, minutephysics has become a staple for those seeking to grasp the complex yet captivating world of physics in, as the name suggests, a minute or less. At the same time, the controversial topic of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has been ingrained in modern agricultural practices, sparking debates on their impacts and safety.
In a whimsically unexpected linkage, this study ventures into the domain where GMOs meet YouTube physics, aiming to explore the enigmatic correlation between the use of GMOs in corn cultivated in North Dakota and the total length of minutephysics videos. It's as if the GMOs are conducting their own "experiment" on the length of these videos, hoping for a favorable outcome and a bountiful harvest of views.
Inquisitively, one might wonder how an agricultural practice could possibly influence the length of online scientific demonstrations. Yet, as we delve into the data, a compelling association begins to emerge, hinting at a potential link that is as engaging and befuddling as a physics paradox.
We embark on this unconventional quest not only to uncover the statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate domains but also to infuse a delightful touch of whimsy and wonder into the realm of scientific inquiry. After all, who knew that the humble cornfield in North Dakota could hold secrets that resonate with the digital intricacies of YouTube content creation?
Intriguing and puzzling in equal measure, the convergence of GMOs and minutephysics videos promises to offer an unparalleled insight that will both entertain and educate, much like the content in question. So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a journey through the physics of GMOs and YouTube, where science meets statistical tomfoolery.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study revealed a statistically significant correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in North Dakota and the total length of minutephysics YouTube videos. The correlation coefficient of 0.8035369 implies a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. It appears that GMOs may have more influence over YouTube video lengths than we ever imagined, perhaps whispering captivating content ideas to the creators late into the night.
With an r-squared value of 0.6456715, we found that approximately 64.57% of the variability in the length of minutephysics videos could be explained by the variation in GMO corn acreage in North Dakota. It's as if the cornfields are encouraging the minutephysics team to craft longer, more elaborate videos, akin to the sprawling and complex root systems beneath the soil.
The significance level (p < 0.01) further reinforces the strength of the relationship we uncovered. It's pretty safe to say that this correlation is about as solid as the GMO corn stalks swaying in the North Dakota breeze.
In Figure 1, we display a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the robust correlation between GMO corn acreage in North Dakota and the total length of minutephysics videos. The data points align themselves with a sense of purpose, as if the GMOs and minutephysics videos are engaged in an unexpected dance of statistical synchronicity.
These findings challenge our preconceptions about the influence of agricultural practices on internet content creation. Who would have thought that the very cornfields of North Dakota could hold such sway over the duration of our favorite science videos? It seems that GMOs may not only be altering the genetic makeup of corn but also the fabric of online science education in their own peculiar way.
In conclusion, our research divulges an intriguing connection between GMOs and minutephysics YouTube videos, urging us to view both agriculture and internet content creation through a lens of statistical whimsy. This unexpected bond between corn and YouTube promises to stimulate further research, inviting scholars to delve deeper into the fascinating and, dare we say, corny relationship between agricultural practices and digital content production.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In this study, we've uncovered a correlation between GMOs and minutephysics videos that is as perplexing as the potential existence of a physics-defying corn kernel. Our findings suggest that the cultivation of genetically modified corn in North Dakota may have a compelling influence on the total length of minutephysics YouTube videos. It's as if the GMOs are planting subliminal messages in the minds of the creators, pushing them to craft longer and more captivating content.

The statistical relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables is more puzzling than a quantum entanglement, yet our data illuminates a comical yet significant connection. It seems that the GMO cornfields are whispering ideas to the minutephysics team, nudging them to elaborate on their already "corny" jokes and puns, or perhaps inspiring them to explore the physics of corn growing in North Dakota.

Our findings not only expand our understanding of the interplay between agricultural practices and internet content creation but also add a lighthearted layer of amusement to the scientific inquiry. Whether the GMOs are engaging in a silent collaboration with the YouTube physics community or simply sowing seeds of inspiration, this unexpected correlation promises to provoke further research and entertain future scholars with its quirky allure.

While the implications of this research are as unpredictable as a corn maze, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. The beauty of this unlikely relationship lies in its charming and enigmatic nature, best left to tickle the fancies of curious minds rather than unravel under the cold scrutiny of further statistical analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited GMOs in the Great Plains: Grasping the Gargantuan Growth of YouTube Videos by minutephysics. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Agriculture and New Media Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited GMOs in the Great Plains: Grasping the Gargantuan Growth of YouTube Videos by minutephysics. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Agricultural Advancements and Multimedia Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled GMOs in the Great Plains: Grasping the Gargantuan Growth of YouTube Videos by minutephysics with an abstract of This paper investigates the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in North Dakota and the total length of minutephysics YouTube videos. We sourced data from the USDA for GMO corn acreage in North Dakota and data from YouTube for the total length of minutephysics videos from 2011 to 2023. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8035369 and a p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest that there may be a peculiar connection between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the duration of the popular science videos by minutephysics. This study not only sheds light on the interaction between agricultural practices and internet content creation but also adds a delightful layer of humor and intrigue to the world of scientific research.

ChatGPT:

GMOs, Great Plains, YouTube, minutephysics, corn, North Dakota, genetically modified organisms, USDA data, GMO corn acreage, YouTube videos, correlation coefficient, p-value, internet content creation, scientific research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in North Dakota that is genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota

Total length of minutephysics YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total length of minutephysics YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Total length of minutephysics YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.8035369 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6456715 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 64.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total length of minutephysics YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota) over the 13 years from 2011 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00094. 0.0009358292336424204000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.8 in 0.094% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,069 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.45, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota (GMO corn %)32362022212521211513121710
Total length of minutephysics YouTube videos (Total length in seconds)62051117243974713345050286654733460521537296027981505




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([32,36,20,22,21,25,21,21,15,13,12,17,10,])
array_2 = np.array([6205,11172,4397,4713,3450,5028,6654,7334,6052,1537,2960,2798,1505,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota"
array_2_name = "Total length of minutephysics YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 5118 · Black Variable ID: 733 · Red Variable ID: 25527
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0