about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,063 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How clickbait-y Technology Connections YouTube video titles are and the second variable is Google searches for 'hottest man on earth'.  The chart goes from 2015 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The decrease in clickbait-y Technology Connections YouTube video titles may have caused a decrease in searches for the "hottest man on earth" as viewers were no longer feeling the 'heat' from exaggerated tech connections. This shift in content may have led to a cooling effect on the search trends, as the focus shifted from sensationalism to more grounded tech topics. It seems like the allure of over-the-top titles may have fizzled out, leaving the 'hottest man on earth' search term feeling a bit, well, 'tech-nically' unappealing.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a Polaroid photo that shows a split screen with a clear contrast between sensationalist clickbait and informative tech content. On the left, feature the Technology Connections YouTube video titles gradually transitioning from clickbait-y language to informative tech content. On the right, display a Google search bar depicting the text "hottest man on earth" with a downward trending graph showcasing a decrease in searches. The juxtaposition represents the shift from sensationalized titles to more substantial tech topics, resulting in a cooling effect on the "hottest man on earth" search trend. The visual should capture the transition from superficial clickbait to a more grounded focus on tech content. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How clickbait-y Technology Connections YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'hottest man on earth'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Charcoal Macabre Realistic Charcoal a Polaroid photo
ChatGPT: a Polaroid photo

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How clickbait-y Technology Connections YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'hottest man on earth', in the following situation: The decrease in clickbait-y Technology Connections YouTube video titles may have caused a decrease in searches for the "hottest man on earth" as viewers were no longer feeling the 'heat' from exaggerated tech connections. This shift in content may have led to a cooling effect on the search trends, as the focus shifted from sensationalism to more grounded tech topics. It seems like the allure of over-the-top titles may have fizzled out, leaving the 'hottest man on earth' search term feeling a bit, well, 'tech-nically' unappealing.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the visual scene, we see a computer screen split into two sections. On the left side, a series of Technology Connections YouTube video titles are displayed, with diminishing levels of clickbait-y language and increasing focus on informative tech content. On the right side, a Google search bar shows the text "hottest man on earth," with a downward trending graph indicating a decrease in searches. The scene depicts a shift from sensationalist clickbait to more grounded tech topics, leading to a cooling effect on the "hottest man on earth" search trend as the allure of over-the-top titles fizzles out.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a Polaroid photo ] and depicting this scene: In the visual scene, we see a computer screen split into two sections. On the left side, a series of Technology Connections YouTube video titles are displayed, with diminishing levels of clickbait-y language and increasing focus on informative tech content. On the right side, a Google search bar shows the text "hottest man on earth," with a downward trending graph indicating a decrease in searches. The scene depicts a shift from sensationalist clickbait to more grounded tech topics, leading to a cooling effect on the "hottest man on earth" search trend as the allure of over-the-top titles fizzles out. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a Polaroid photo that shows a split screen with a clear contrast between sensationalist clickbait and informative tech content. On the left, feature the Technology Connections YouTube video titles gradually transitioning from clickbait-y language to informative tech content. On the right, display a Google search bar depicting the text "hottest man on earth" with a downward trending graph showcasing a decrease in searches. The juxtaposition represents the shift from sensationalized titles to more substantial tech topics, resulting in a cooling effect on the "hottest man on earth" search trend. The visual should capture the transition from superficial clickbait to a more grounded focus on tech content.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in How clickbait-y Technology Connections YouTube video titles are caused hottest man on earth (Google searches for 'hottest man on earth') to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Clickbaiting the Hottest Man: A Tale of Technology Connections and Google Searches

The Journal of Hyperbolic Internet Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Technology Connections YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'hottest man on earth'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8738168 and p < 0.01 for 2015 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Clickbaiting the Hottest Man: A Tale of Technology Connections and Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aimed to uncover the tantalizing and titillating relationship between the clickbait-y titles of Technology Connections' YouTube videos and the Google searches for the "hottest man on earth." Utilizing AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends data from 2015 to 2023, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8738168 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings unravel the peculiar connection between the captivating allure of clickbait and the quest for the ultimate embodiment of male attractiveness. This research sheds light on the whimsical interplay between internet trends and human curiosity, leaving us pondering the depths of human fascination and perhaps redefining the parameters of what truly makes a man scorching hot.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Technology Connections YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'hottest man on earth'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Clickbaiting the Hottest Man: A Tale of Technology Connections and Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aimed to uncover the tantalizing and titillating relationship between the clickbait-y titles of Technology Connections' YouTube videos and the Google searches for the "hottest man on earth." Utilizing AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends data from 2015 to 2023, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8738168 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings unravel the peculiar connection between the captivating allure of clickbait and the quest for the ultimate embodiment of male attractiveness. This research sheds light on the whimsical interplay between internet trends and human curiosity, leaving us pondering the depths of human fascination and perhaps redefining the parameters of what truly makes a man scorching hot.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
**[[INTRODUCTION]]**

The world of internet clickbait is a treacherous landscape, filled with hyperbole, sensationalism, and promises of "you won't believe what happens next." Amidst this digital jungle, the YouTube channel Technology Connections has carved out its own niche, enticing viewers with intriguing videos on technological oddities and historical curiosities. But what if, amidst the clicks and the baits, there lies a connection to something altogether different – the eternal quest to find the "hottest man on earth"?

Before we delve into the sizzling details of our findings, let us first examine the phenomenon of clickbait. The term "clickbait" itself is a peculiar cocktail of enticement and frustration, as it lures us in with the promise of something extraordinary, only to often disappoint with its lackluster yield. It is the digital equivalent of a magician's sleight of hand, leading us to expect a rabbit and revealing a soggy bunny slipper instead. Nonetheless, the allure of clickbait persists, as millions of netizens are irresistibly drawn in by titles promising to reveal "shocking truths" or "mind-blowing secrets," much like moths to a digital flame.

Enter the enigmatic world of Google searches for the "hottest man on earth." Now, it's a well-established fact that the internet is a repository of a wide array of human curiosities, from the bizarre to the borderline absurd. The quest for the "hottest man on earth" is no exception, captivating the global populace with its quixotic pursuit of the quintessential paragon of male pulchritude. One can only wonder whether such an endeavor is rooted in a genuine yearning for aesthetic perfection or simply an online escapade of playful folly.

In this scholarly endeavor, we embark on a quest of our own – a quest to unravel the intricate web of connections between the clickbait-infused titles of Technology Connections' YouTube videos and the fervent Google searches for the apotheosis of masculine allure. Armed with the tools of AI analysis and Google Trends data, we sought to peel back the layers of digital intrigue and reveal the correlations that lie beneath the surface.

So, dear reader, prepare to be astounded, amused, and perhaps even slightly perplexed as we journey through the labyrinthine realm of clickbait, technology, and the timeless pursuit of allure. For what we have discovered might just challenge the very foundations of what we perceive as captivating in the digital age, and leave us pondering whether, in the realm of internet fascination, allure truly knows no bounds. Let us proceed, then, armed with curiosity and a healthy dose of skepticism, into the heart of this enigmatic synthesis.

And remember, in the words of the great bard Shakespeare, "The bait is set, the click is drawn, and in the elder scrolls of cyberspace, let's unravel what is dawn." (Okay, he might not have said that last part, but it felt appropriate at the time.)

Stay with us, as we reveal the tantalizing tale of "Clickbaiting the Hottest Man."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Technology Connections YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'hottest man on earth'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Clickbaiting the Hottest Man: A Tale of Technology Connections and Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aimed to uncover the tantalizing and titillating relationship between the clickbait-y titles of Technology Connections' YouTube videos and the Google searches for the "hottest man on earth." Utilizing AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends data from 2015 to 2023, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8738168 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings unravel the peculiar connection between the captivating allure of clickbait and the quest for the ultimate embodiment of male attractiveness. This research sheds light on the whimsical interplay between internet trends and human curiosity, leaving us pondering the depths of human fascination and perhaps redefining the parameters of what truly makes a man scorching hot.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of internet clickbait is a treacherous landscape, filled with hyperbole, sensationalism, and promises of "you won't believe what happens next." Amidst this digital jungle, the YouTube channel Technology Connections has carved out its own niche, enticing viewers with intriguing videos on technological oddities and historical curiosities. But what if, amidst the clicks and the baits, there lies a connection to something altogether different – the eternal quest to find the "hottest man on earth"?
Before we delve into the sizzling details of our findings, let us first examine the phenomenon of clickbait. The term "clickbait" itself is a peculiar cocktail of enticement and frustration, as it lures us in with the promise of something extraordinary, only to often disappoint with its lackluster yield. It is the digital equivalent of a magician's sleight of hand, leading us to expect a rabbit and revealing a soggy bunny slipper instead. Nonetheless, the allure of clickbait persists, as millions of netizens are irresistibly drawn in by titles promising to reveal "shocking truths" or "mind-blowing secrets," much like moths to a digital flame.
Enter the enigmatic world of Google searches for the "hottest man on earth." Now, it's a well-established fact that the internet is a repository of a wide array of human curiosities, from the bizarre to the borderline absurd. The quest for the "hottest man on earth" is no exception, captivating the global populace with its quixotic pursuit of the quintessential paragon of male pulchritude. One can only wonder whether such an endeavor is rooted in a genuine yearning for aesthetic perfection or simply an online escapade of playful folly.
In this scholarly endeavor, we embark on a quest of our own – a quest to unravel the intricate web of connections between the clickbait-infused titles of Technology Connections' YouTube videos and the fervent Google searches for the apotheosis of masculine allure. Armed with the tools of AI analysis and Google Trends data, we sought to peel back the layers of digital intrigue and reveal the correlations that lie beneath the surface.
So, dear reader, prepare to be astounded, amused, and perhaps even slightly perplexed as we journey through the labyrinthine realm of clickbait, technology, and the timeless pursuit of allure. For what we have discovered might just challenge the very foundations of what we perceive as captivating in the digital age, and leave us pondering whether, in the realm of internet fascination, allure truly knows no bounds. Let us proceed, then, armed with curiosity and a healthy dose of skepticism, into the heart of this enigmatic synthesis.
And remember, in the words of the great bard Shakespeare, "The bait is set, the click is drawn, and in the elder scrolls of cyberspace, let's unravel what is dawn." (Okay, he might not have said that last part, but it felt appropriate at the time.)
Stay with us, as we reveal the tantalizing tale of "Clickbaiting the Hottest Man."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, Smith et al. (2017) examined the impact of online video titles on viewer engagement, shedding light on the persuasive power of clickbait and its role in capturing the attention of internet users. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2019) delved into the psychological underpinnings of clickbait, unraveling the intricate mechanisms through which sensationalist titles invoke curiosity and incite clicks.

Turning our attention to the realm of popular non-fiction literature, "The Art of Clickbait: Crafting Irresistible Titles" by A. Attention-Grabber (2018) presents a comprehensive exploration of the techniques used to create compelling online headlines. Meanwhile, "The Quest for Male Elegance" by B. Dazzle (2020) offers insight into the timeless pursuit of male attractiveness, albeit not precisely in the context of internet searches.

Venturing into the world of fiction, J.K. Rowling's "The Clickbait Chronicles" and George R.R. Martin's "A Song of SEO and Clicks" hold a striking allure, despite their lack of direct relevance to our research topic. Nonetheless, these literary works embody the captivating nature of intrigue and the age-old pursuit of attention – elements that undoubtedly resonate in the realm of YouTube titles and internet searches for male attractiveness.

In the cinematic sphere, the movies "Clickbait: A Tale of Temptation" and "The Hot Pursuit of Allure" – while not directly related to our research question – provide a whimsical backdrop that allows us to appreciate the quirky interplay between digital enticement and human fascination.

As we tread into the uncharted territories of combining YouTube clickbait and the pursuit of male allure, we are reminded of the tantalizing nature of exploration and the unexpected connections that may arise. So, with a dash of humor and a dollop of curiosity, let us embark on this whimsical journey through the crossroads of online allure and the quest for the "hottest man on earth."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Technology Connections YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'hottest man on earth'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends . You used data from 2015 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Clickbaiting the Hottest Man: A Tale of Technology Connections and Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aimed to uncover the tantalizing and titillating relationship between the clickbait-y titles of Technology Connections' YouTube videos and the Google searches for the "hottest man on earth." Utilizing AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends data from 2015 to 2023, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8738168 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings unravel the peculiar connection between the captivating allure of clickbait and the quest for the ultimate embodiment of male attractiveness. This research sheds light on the whimsical interplay between internet trends and human curiosity, leaving us pondering the depths of human fascination and perhaps redefining the parameters of what truly makes a man scorching hot.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of internet clickbait is a treacherous landscape, filled with hyperbole, sensationalism, and promises of "you won't believe what happens next." Amidst this digital jungle, the YouTube channel Technology Connections has carved out its own niche, enticing viewers with intriguing videos on technological oddities and historical curiosities. But what if, amidst the clicks and the baits, there lies a connection to something altogether different – the eternal quest to find the "hottest man on earth"?
Before we delve into the sizzling details of our findings, let us first examine the phenomenon of clickbait. The term "clickbait" itself is a peculiar cocktail of enticement and frustration, as it lures us in with the promise of something extraordinary, only to often disappoint with its lackluster yield. It is the digital equivalent of a magician's sleight of hand, leading us to expect a rabbit and revealing a soggy bunny slipper instead. Nonetheless, the allure of clickbait persists, as millions of netizens are irresistibly drawn in by titles promising to reveal "shocking truths" or "mind-blowing secrets," much like moths to a digital flame.
Enter the enigmatic world of Google searches for the "hottest man on earth." Now, it's a well-established fact that the internet is a repository of a wide array of human curiosities, from the bizarre to the borderline absurd. The quest for the "hottest man on earth" is no exception, captivating the global populace with its quixotic pursuit of the quintessential paragon of male pulchritude. One can only wonder whether such an endeavor is rooted in a genuine yearning for aesthetic perfection or simply an online escapade of playful folly.
In this scholarly endeavor, we embark on a quest of our own – a quest to unravel the intricate web of connections between the clickbait-infused titles of Technology Connections' YouTube videos and the fervent Google searches for the apotheosis of masculine allure. Armed with the tools of AI analysis and Google Trends data, we sought to peel back the layers of digital intrigue and reveal the correlations that lie beneath the surface.
So, dear reader, prepare to be astounded, amused, and perhaps even slightly perplexed as we journey through the labyrinthine realm of clickbait, technology, and the timeless pursuit of allure. For what we have discovered might just challenge the very foundations of what we perceive as captivating in the digital age, and leave us pondering whether, in the realm of internet fascination, allure truly knows no bounds. Let us proceed, then, armed with curiosity and a healthy dose of skepticism, into the heart of this enigmatic synthesis.
And remember, in the words of the great bard Shakespeare, "The bait is set, the click is drawn, and in the elder scrolls of cyberspace, let's unravel what is dawn." (Okay, he might not have said that last part, but it felt appropriate at the time.)
Stay with us, as we reveal the tantalizing tale of "Clickbaiting the Hottest Man."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To probe the tantalizing and mysterious relationship between the clickbait-laden titles of Technology Connections' YouTube videos and the insatiable quest for the "hottest man on earth," we employed a mixed-methods approach that integrated AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends data from 2015 to 2023.

First and foremost, our team of intrepid researchers donned their virtual Sherlock Holmes caps and embarked on an extensive quest to collect an exhaustive dataset of Technology Connections' clickbait-y video titles. This involved scrolling through countless thumbnails, navigating the labyrinthine depths of YouTube's suggested videos, and honing our digital sleuthing skills to unearth the most tantalizing titles to grace the platform. Admittedly, at times it felt akin to wading through a digital marsh of misleading promises and exaggerated claims, but our resolve never wavered.

Once the dataset of clickbait-y video titles was meticulously curated, our crack team of AI specialists deployed their digital wizardry to discern the nuances of clickbait linguistics and semantic manipulations. Employing a convolutional neural network trained on a diet of clickbait from the furthest corners of the internet, we sought to distill the essence of captivating clickbait and unravel the cunning strategies deployed to ensnare unsuspecting viewers. This process involved an intricate dance of natural language processing, sentiment analysis, and a dash of algorithmic whimsy to capture the mercurial nature of clickbait's enticements.

Simultaneously, our data sleuths delved into the convoluted expanse of Google Trends, where queries for the "hottest man on earth" shimmered like digital constellations in the cyber firmament. Here, we meticulously tracked the temporal ebbs and flows of public interest in this enigmatic pursuit of male allure, navigating the peaks of curiosity and the troughs of indifference with the steadfast determination of intrepid navigators on the digital seas.

These divergent streams of data, brimming with clickbait allure and fervent searches for male pulchritude, were then subjected to the rigors of statistical analysis. Employing correlation coefficients and regression models with the solemnity of digital monks transcribing the gospel of internet trends, we sought to unveil the hidden threads that bound the captivating titles of Technology Connections' videos to the fervent yearning for the paragon of male attractiveness.

The resulting statistical insights were then bathed in the scrutinizing light of peer review and subjected to the quizzical gazes of esteemed scholars, ensuring that our findings bore the imprimatur of scholarly rigor and academic gravitas. Only then were we ready to unveil the captivating tale of "Clickbaiting the Hottest Man."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Technology Connections YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'hottest man on earth'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends .

For the time period 2015 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8738168, r-squared of 0.7635558, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Clickbaiting the Hottest Man: A Tale of Technology Connections and Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aimed to uncover the tantalizing and titillating relationship between the clickbait-y titles of Technology Connections' YouTube videos and the Google searches for the "hottest man on earth." Utilizing AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends data from 2015 to 2023, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8738168 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings unravel the peculiar connection between the captivating allure of clickbait and the quest for the ultimate embodiment of male attractiveness. This research sheds light on the whimsical interplay between internet trends and human curiosity, leaving us pondering the depths of human fascination and perhaps redefining the parameters of what truly makes a man scorching hot.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of internet clickbait is a treacherous landscape, filled with hyperbole, sensationalism, and promises of "you won't believe what happens next." Amidst this digital jungle, the YouTube channel Technology Connections has carved out its own niche, enticing viewers with intriguing videos on technological oddities and historical curiosities. But what if, amidst the clicks and the baits, there lies a connection to something altogether different – the eternal quest to find the "hottest man on earth"?
Before we delve into the sizzling details of our findings, let us first examine the phenomenon of clickbait. The term "clickbait" itself is a peculiar cocktail of enticement and frustration, as it lures us in with the promise of something extraordinary, only to often disappoint with its lackluster yield. It is the digital equivalent of a magician's sleight of hand, leading us to expect a rabbit and revealing a soggy bunny slipper instead. Nonetheless, the allure of clickbait persists, as millions of netizens are irresistibly drawn in by titles promising to reveal "shocking truths" or "mind-blowing secrets," much like moths to a digital flame.
Enter the enigmatic world of Google searches for the "hottest man on earth." Now, it's a well-established fact that the internet is a repository of a wide array of human curiosities, from the bizarre to the borderline absurd. The quest for the "hottest man on earth" is no exception, captivating the global populace with its quixotic pursuit of the quintessential paragon of male pulchritude. One can only wonder whether such an endeavor is rooted in a genuine yearning for aesthetic perfection or simply an online escapade of playful folly.
In this scholarly endeavor, we embark on a quest of our own – a quest to unravel the intricate web of connections between the clickbait-infused titles of Technology Connections' YouTube videos and the fervent Google searches for the apotheosis of masculine allure. Armed with the tools of AI analysis and Google Trends data, we sought to peel back the layers of digital intrigue and reveal the correlations that lie beneath the surface.
So, dear reader, prepare to be astounded, amused, and perhaps even slightly perplexed as we journey through the labyrinthine realm of clickbait, technology, and the timeless pursuit of allure. For what we have discovered might just challenge the very foundations of what we perceive as captivating in the digital age, and leave us pondering whether, in the realm of internet fascination, allure truly knows no bounds. Let us proceed, then, armed with curiosity and a healthy dose of skepticism, into the heart of this enigmatic synthesis.
And remember, in the words of the great bard Shakespeare, "The bait is set, the click is drawn, and in the elder scrolls of cyberspace, let's unravel what is dawn." (Okay, he might not have said that last part, but it felt appropriate at the time.)
Stay with us, as we reveal the tantalizing tale of "Clickbaiting the Hottest Man."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis revealed a strong correlation between the clickbait-y titles of Technology Connections' YouTube videos and Google searches for the "hottest man on earth," with a correlation coefficient of 0.8738168 and an r-squared value of 0.7635558, both indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The p-value, at less than 0.01, further confirms the statistical significance of this association, suggesting that the likelihood of obtaining such results due to random chance is about as probable as finding a unicorn in your backyard.

To visually illustrate this connection, we present the scatterplot shown in Fig. 1, which depicts the striking alignment of the two variables. The trendline resembling a hot chili pepper underscores the fiery nature of the relationship, while the data points form a constellation of intrigue and astonishment, much like a digital rendition of the night sky.

The outcomes of this analysis provoke contemplation on the peculiarities of human curiosity and the seductive allure of clickbait. One might ponder whether the quest for the "hottest man on earth" is a fervent pursuit of aesthetically pleasing masculinity, an escapade into the realm of whimsical indulgence, or a combination of both. The correlation between these disparate elements invites us to consider the deeper motivations driving online searches and the role that captivating titles play in shaping digital pursuits.

This groundbreaking research not only debunks the age-old stereotype of clickbait as mere frivolity, but also prompts a reevaluation of how online content influences our perceptions and interests. The interplay between technology, allure, and digital engagement is underscored by these findings, leaving us questioning the enigmatic forces that drive internet trends and human fascination.

In summary, the results of this study offer an intriguing glimpse into the interconnected realms of clickbait, technology, and the quest for allure. The correlation between the clickbait-y titles of Technology Connections' YouTube videos and Google searches for the "hottest man on earth" serves as a testament to the intricacies of human curiosity and the unexpected avenues through which it manifests in the digital sphere.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Technology Connections YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'hottest man on earth'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Clickbaiting the Hottest Man: A Tale of Technology Connections and Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aimed to uncover the tantalizing and titillating relationship between the clickbait-y titles of Technology Connections' YouTube videos and the Google searches for the "hottest man on earth." Utilizing AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends data from 2015 to 2023, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8738168 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings unravel the peculiar connection between the captivating allure of clickbait and the quest for the ultimate embodiment of male attractiveness. This research sheds light on the whimsical interplay between internet trends and human curiosity, leaving us pondering the depths of human fascination and perhaps redefining the parameters of what truly makes a man scorching hot.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, Smith et al. (2017) examined the impact of online video titles on viewer engagement, shedding light on the persuasive power of clickbait and its role in capturing the attention of internet users. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2019) delved into the psychological underpinnings of clickbait, unraveling the intricate mechanisms through which sensationalist titles invoke curiosity and incite clicks.
Turning our attention to the realm of popular non-fiction literature, "The Art of Clickbait: Crafting Irresistible Titles" by A. Attention-Grabber (2018) presents a comprehensive exploration of the techniques used to create compelling online headlines. Meanwhile, "The Quest for Male Elegance" by B. Dazzle (2020) offers insight into the timeless pursuit of male attractiveness, albeit not precisely in the context of internet searches.
Venturing into the world of fiction, J.K. Rowling's "The Clickbait Chronicles" and George R.R. Martin's "A Song of SEO and Clicks" hold a striking allure, despite their lack of direct relevance to our research topic. Nonetheless, these literary works embody the captivating nature of intrigue and the age-old pursuit of attention – elements that undoubtedly resonate in the realm of YouTube titles and internet searches for male attractiveness.
In the cinematic sphere, the movies "Clickbait: A Tale of Temptation" and "The Hot Pursuit of Allure" – while not directly related to our research question – provide a whimsical backdrop that allows us to appreciate the quirky interplay between digital enticement and human fascination.
As we tread into the uncharted territories of combining YouTube clickbait and the pursuit of male allure, we are reminded of the tantalizing nature of exploration and the unexpected connections that may arise. So, with a dash of humor and a dollop of curiosity, let us embark on this whimsical journey through the crossroads of online allure and the quest for the "hottest man on earth."

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a strong correlation between the clickbait-y titles of Technology Connections' YouTube videos and Google searches for the "hottest man on earth," with a correlation coefficient of 0.8738168 and an r-squared value of 0.7635558, both indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The p-value, at less than 0.01, further confirms the statistical significance of this association, suggesting that the likelihood of obtaining such results due to random chance is about as probable as finding a unicorn in your backyard.
To visually illustrate this connection, we present the scatterplot shown in Fig. 1, which depicts the striking alignment of the two variables. The trendline resembling a hot chili pepper underscores the fiery nature of the relationship, while the data points form a constellation of intrigue and astonishment, much like a digital rendition of the night sky.
The outcomes of this analysis provoke contemplation on the peculiarities of human curiosity and the seductive allure of clickbait. One might ponder whether the quest for the "hottest man on earth" is a fervent pursuit of aesthetically pleasing masculinity, an escapade into the realm of whimsical indulgence, or a combination of both. The correlation between these disparate elements invites us to consider the deeper motivations driving online searches and the role that captivating titles play in shaping digital pursuits.
This groundbreaking research not only debunks the age-old stereotype of clickbait as mere frivolity, but also prompts a reevaluation of how online content influences our perceptions and interests. The interplay between technology, allure, and digital engagement is underscored by these findings, leaving us questioning the enigmatic forces that drive internet trends and human fascination.
In summary, the results of this study offer an intriguing glimpse into the interconnected realms of clickbait, technology, and the quest for allure. The correlation between the clickbait-y titles of Technology Connections' YouTube videos and Google searches for the "hottest man on earth" serves as a testament to the intricacies of human curiosity and the unexpected avenues through which it manifests in the digital sphere.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The outcome of our study has paved the way for a blend of technological whimsy and human curiosity, unfurling the enigmatic connection between the clickbait-y titles of Technology Connections' YouTube videos and the arcane pursuit of the "hottest man on earth." Our results corroborate earlier research on the mesmerizing power of clickbait, as evidenced by Smith et al. (2017) and Doe and Jones (2019). These findings not only reinforce the persuasive prowess of tantalizing titles but also accentuate the allure of online intrigue, much like an irresistible siren's call in digital waters.

As we delve into the correlation coefficient of 0.8738168, one cannot help but contemplate the fervor behind the search for the epitome of male allure. It seems that the digital landscape, much like a boundless Tinder of information, is encompassed by the quest for an unattainable ideal – a pursuit that echoes the timeless fascination with the unreachable. The robust relationship conveyed by this statistical measure is like finding a rare gem in a sea of digital deluge, shining bright with a luster that captivates the empirical eye.

Moreover, our results align with the observations of B. Dazzle (2020) on the timeless pursuit of male elegance, albeit through the unorthodox lens of digital quests. The correlation between clickbait and the quest for allure suggests that human fascination transcends traditional boundaries, manifesting in obscure and unexpected ways. It's as if the capricious dance of human intrigue leads us down whimsical alleys of curiosity, adorned with digital clickbait as our flickering lantern.

Indeed, the scatterplot resembling a fiery chili pepper not only visually conveys the fervent nature of this relationship but also evokes a spicy metaphorical tang to the enigma we unravel. This depiction is akin to savoring the unexpected piquancy of intrigue, much like biting into a deceptively potent jalapeño that leaves us simultaneously startled and exhilarated.

In essence, our study illuminates the vibrant interplay between the digital allure of clickbait and the whimsical pursuit of male attractiveness, offering a glimpse into the uncharted waters of internet trends and human fascination. These results prompt a reevaluation of the captivating forces that drive online engagement, leaving us to ponder the unexpected whims of internet searches and the ineffable charm of clickbait's alluring call.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Technology Connections YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'hottest man on earth'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Clickbaiting the Hottest Man: A Tale of Technology Connections and Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aimed to uncover the tantalizing and titillating relationship between the clickbait-y titles of Technology Connections' YouTube videos and the Google searches for the "hottest man on earth." Utilizing AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends data from 2015 to 2023, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8738168 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings unravel the peculiar connection between the captivating allure of clickbait and the quest for the ultimate embodiment of male attractiveness. This research sheds light on the whimsical interplay between internet trends and human curiosity, leaving us pondering the depths of human fascination and perhaps redefining the parameters of what truly makes a man scorching hot.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of internet clickbait is a treacherous landscape, filled with hyperbole, sensationalism, and promises of "you won't believe what happens next." Amidst this digital jungle, the YouTube channel Technology Connections has carved out its own niche, enticing viewers with intriguing videos on technological oddities and historical curiosities. But what if, amidst the clicks and the baits, there lies a connection to something altogether different – the eternal quest to find the "hottest man on earth"?
Before we delve into the sizzling details of our findings, let us first examine the phenomenon of clickbait. The term "clickbait" itself is a peculiar cocktail of enticement and frustration, as it lures us in with the promise of something extraordinary, only to often disappoint with its lackluster yield. It is the digital equivalent of a magician's sleight of hand, leading us to expect a rabbit and revealing a soggy bunny slipper instead. Nonetheless, the allure of clickbait persists, as millions of netizens are irresistibly drawn in by titles promising to reveal "shocking truths" or "mind-blowing secrets," much like moths to a digital flame.
Enter the enigmatic world of Google searches for the "hottest man on earth." Now, it's a well-established fact that the internet is a repository of a wide array of human curiosities, from the bizarre to the borderline absurd. The quest for the "hottest man on earth" is no exception, captivating the global populace with its quixotic pursuit of the quintessential paragon of male pulchritude. One can only wonder whether such an endeavor is rooted in a genuine yearning for aesthetic perfection or simply an online escapade of playful folly.
In this scholarly endeavor, we embark on a quest of our own – a quest to unravel the intricate web of connections between the clickbait-infused titles of Technology Connections' YouTube videos and the fervent Google searches for the apotheosis of masculine allure. Armed with the tools of AI analysis and Google Trends data, we sought to peel back the layers of digital intrigue and reveal the correlations that lie beneath the surface.
So, dear reader, prepare to be astounded, amused, and perhaps even slightly perplexed as we journey through the labyrinthine realm of clickbait, technology, and the timeless pursuit of allure. For what we have discovered might just challenge the very foundations of what we perceive as captivating in the digital age, and leave us pondering whether, in the realm of internet fascination, allure truly knows no bounds. Let us proceed, then, armed with curiosity and a healthy dose of skepticism, into the heart of this enigmatic synthesis.
And remember, in the words of the great bard Shakespeare, "The bait is set, the click is drawn, and in the elder scrolls of cyberspace, let's unravel what is dawn." (Okay, he might not have said that last part, but it felt appropriate at the time.)
Stay with us, as we reveal the tantalizing tale of "Clickbaiting the Hottest Man."

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a strong correlation between the clickbait-y titles of Technology Connections' YouTube videos and Google searches for the "hottest man on earth," with a correlation coefficient of 0.8738168 and an r-squared value of 0.7635558, both indicating a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The p-value, at less than 0.01, further confirms the statistical significance of this association, suggesting that the likelihood of obtaining such results due to random chance is about as probable as finding a unicorn in your backyard.
To visually illustrate this connection, we present the scatterplot shown in Fig. 1, which depicts the striking alignment of the two variables. The trendline resembling a hot chili pepper underscores the fiery nature of the relationship, while the data points form a constellation of intrigue and astonishment, much like a digital rendition of the night sky.
The outcomes of this analysis provoke contemplation on the peculiarities of human curiosity and the seductive allure of clickbait. One might ponder whether the quest for the "hottest man on earth" is a fervent pursuit of aesthetically pleasing masculinity, an escapade into the realm of whimsical indulgence, or a combination of both. The correlation between these disparate elements invites us to consider the deeper motivations driving online searches and the role that captivating titles play in shaping digital pursuits.
This groundbreaking research not only debunks the age-old stereotype of clickbait as mere frivolity, but also prompts a reevaluation of how online content influences our perceptions and interests. The interplay between technology, allure, and digital engagement is underscored by these findings, leaving us questioning the enigmatic forces that drive internet trends and human fascination.
In summary, the results of this study offer an intriguing glimpse into the interconnected realms of clickbait, technology, and the quest for allure. The correlation between the clickbait-y titles of Technology Connections' YouTube videos and Google searches for the "hottest man on earth" serves as a testament to the intricacies of human curiosity and the unexpected avenues through which it manifests in the digital sphere.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the scorching connection between clickbait-y titles of Technology Connections' YouTube videos and Google searches for the "hottest man on earth" has been unveiled, shedding light on the irresistible allure of digital intrigue and the pursuit of aesthetic perfection. As we reflect on the hot chili pepper-shaped trendline and the constellation of curiosity depicted in our scatterplot, we can't help but marvel at the fiery relationship between these apparently incongruous elements. It appears that internet users are not only seeking technological insights but also succumbing to the siren call of male pulchritude, all while navigating the digital jungle of clickbait.

The findings of this study provoke contemplation on the whimsical interplay of captivating titles, human curiosity, and the quest for allure. Are we truly seeking the "hottest man on earth" or merely indulging in an online escapade of playful folly? It seems that even in the realm of internet fascination, allure knows no bounds, drawing us into a digital merry-go-round of unmistakable captivation and bemusement.

As we wrap up this research, it is evident that no more probing is needed in this area of study. We have unsheathed the enigmatic connections between clickbait, technology, and the quest for allure, leaving no stone unturned in our pursuit of digital enlightenment. Therefore, we confidently assert that further exploration of this scintillating topic would be akin to searching for a needle in a haystack – a quest as futile as finding a pineapple in a pizza parlor.

In the immortal words of William Shakespeare, "To click, or not to click, that is the question." With that said, we bid adieu to this enthralling expedition, knowing that our revelation of this tantalizing tale has left a scintillating mark on the digital landscape.

In the end, let us not forget that while the quest for the "hottest man on earth" may continue, our quest for understanding the digital dance of allure and captivation has come to a satisfying conclusion.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Clickbaiting the Hottest Man: A Tale of Technology Connections and Google Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Hyperbolic Internet Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Clickbaiting the Hottest Man: A Tale of Technology Connections and Google Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Internet Culture and Digital Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Clickbaiting the Hottest Man: A Tale of Technology Connections and Google Searches with an abstract of In this study, we aimed to uncover the tantalizing and titillating relationship between the clickbait-y titles of Technology Connections' YouTube videos and the Google searches for the "hottest man on earth." Utilizing AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends data from 2015 to 2023, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8738168 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings unravel the peculiar connection between the captivating allure of clickbait and the quest for the ultimate embodiment of male attractiveness. This research sheds light on the whimsical interplay between internet trends and human curiosity, leaving us pondering the depths of human fascination and perhaps redefining the parameters of what truly makes a man scorching hot.

ChatGPT:

clickbait, YouTube videos, Google search, Technology Connections, AI analysis, Google Trends, correlation coefficient, p-value, male attractiveness, internet trends, human curiosity

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How clickbait-y Technology Connections YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How clickbait-y Technology Connections YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How clickbait-y Technology Connections YouTube video titles are

Google searches for 'hottest man on earth'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'hottest man on earth' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'hottest man on earth'

Correlation r = 0.8738168 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7635558 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 76.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'hottest man on earth') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How clickbait-y Technology Connections YouTube video titles are) over the 9 years from 2015 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00207. 0.0020726464501077310000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 0.207% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 482 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.5, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201520162017201820192020202120222023
How clickbait-y Technology Connections YouTube video titles are (Clickbait-y score)43.83.61113.42113.53573.85713.66673.94743.8
Google searches for 'hottest man on earth' (Rel. search volume)20.166713.666710.66678.510.512.583312.916714.2514.0833




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4,3.8,3.6111,3.4211,3.5357,3.8571,3.6667,3.9474,3.8,])
array_2 = np.array([20.1667,13.6667,10.6667,8.5,10.5,12.5833,12.9167,14.25,14.0833,])
array_1_name = "How clickbait-y Technology Connections YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'hottest man on earth'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 5063 · Black Variable ID: 25708 · Red Variable ID: 1430
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0