about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,057 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Republican Senators in New Mexico and the second variable is Mega millions lottery numbers.  The chart goes from 2002 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The uptick in Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico has led to a surge in demand for red chili peppers, a New Mexico staple. As more and more people clamor for these spicy delights, farmers are experiencing an unexpected boom in business. To keep up with the spicy demand, these farmers are innovating their agricultural practices, inadvertently creating a perfect environment for mega-sized, record-breaking lottery numbers to sprout and ripen. It's a red-hot political phenomenon that's spicing up more than just the Senate race!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image showing a New Mexico farmer's market bustling with activity. A vibrant display of freshly harvested red chili peppers takes center stage. Amidst the shoppers joyously purchasing the spicy staple, lottery enthusiasts are seen eagerly checking their tickets for the mega-sized, record-breaking numbers. Show the farmers tending to their produce, unwittingly nurturing the perfect environment for the mega lottery numbers to sprout and ripen. The scene should exude the lively energy of the market while capturing the unexpected connection between the surge in Republican votes and the boom in business for the farmers. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico and Mega millions lottery numbers. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a funny image you would see on reddit inspired by bauhaus A Discovery magazine cover image Cutsy art illustration Whimsical illustration
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico and Mega millions lottery numbers, in the following situation: The uptick in Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico has led to a surge in demand for red chili peppers, a New Mexico staple. As more and more people clamor for these spicy delights, farmers are experiencing an unexpected boom in business. To keep up with the spicy demand, these farmers are innovating their agricultural practices, inadvertently creating a perfect environment for mega-sized, record-breaking lottery numbers to sprout and ripen. It's a red-hot political phenomenon that's spicing up more than just the Senate race!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a New Mexico farmer's market, the air is alive with the aroma of freshly harvested red chili peppers. Republican voters are joyously shopping for the spicy staple while lottery enthusiasts eagerly check their tickets for the mega-sized, record-breaking numbers on display amidst the vibrant red peppers. The surge in Republican votes has ignited a demand for the spicy delight, leading to an unexpected boom in business for the farmers, who are unwittingly nurturing the perfect environment for the mega lottery numbers to sprout and ripen.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a New Mexico farmer's market, the air is alive with the aroma of freshly harvested red chili peppers. Republican voters are joyously shopping for the spicy staple while lottery enthusiasts eagerly check their tickets for the mega-sized, record-breaking numbers on display amidst the vibrant red peppers. The surge in Republican votes has ignited a demand for the spicy delight, leading to an unexpected boom in business for the farmers, who are unwittingly nurturing the perfect environment for the mega lottery numbers to sprout and ripen. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image showing a New Mexico farmer's market bustling with activity. A vibrant display of freshly harvested red chili peppers takes center stage. Amidst the shoppers joyously purchasing the spicy staple, lottery enthusiasts are seen eagerly checking their tickets for the mega-sized, record-breaking numbers. Show the farmers tending to their produce, unwittingly nurturing the perfect environment for the mega lottery numbers to sprout and ripen. The scene should exude the lively energy of the market while capturing the unexpected connection between the surge in Republican votes and the boom in business for the farmers.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico caused Mega millions lottery numbers to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Blazing Blue and Red Correlation: Exploring the Interplay Between Republican Votes for Senators and Mega Millions Lottery Numbers in New Mexico

Journal of Political Probability

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico and Mega millions lottery numbers. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and NY Mega Millions Lottery to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8899133 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Blazing Blue and Red Correlation: Exploring the Interplay Between Republican Votes for Senators and Mega Millions Lottery Numbers in New Mexico

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious connection between Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico and the Mega Millions lottery numbers. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery, we aimed to uncover any potential correlations between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. To our surprise, our analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.8899133 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2020. The findings of this study, while undeniably entertaining, shed light on a truly unusual correlation that defies conventional logic. We aim to spark further investigation and discussion in the realm of political voting patterns and lottery number selections, prompting a more lighthearted perspective on the intersection of politics and chance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico and Mega millions lottery numbers. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Blazing Blue and Red Correlation: Exploring the Interplay Between Republican Votes for Senators and Mega Millions Lottery Numbers in New Mexico

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious connection between Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico and the Mega Millions lottery numbers. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery, we aimed to uncover any potential correlations between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. To our surprise, our analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.8899133 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2020. The findings of this study, while undeniably entertaining, shed light on a truly unusual correlation that defies conventional logic. We aim to spark further investigation and discussion in the realm of political voting patterns and lottery number selections, prompting a more lighthearted perspective on the intersection of politics and chance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

Politics and probability are not typically bedfellows, but our research has uncovered a correlation that is as unlikely as winning the lottery itself. While many may wager that the selection of lottery numbers and political preferences are as related as a fish and a bicycle, our findings beg to differ. We have embarked on a quest that marries the red and blue of political affiliations with the numbers game of Mega Millions in the enchanting state of New Mexico.

Picture this: a fervent Republican voter strolls into the polling station, casts their ballot, and then, just for a bit of extra luck, purchases a ticket for the Mega Millions. Little do they know, there may be an invisible thread tying their political allegiance to their lottery number choices. The notion might seem as preposterous as a unicorn entering a horse race, but our investigation is here to reveal the unexpected.

We have dived headfirst into the sea of data, navigating the labyrinth of numbers and ballots as if on a treasure hunt for an elusive connection. Armed with datasets from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery, we explored the terrain, both statistically and geographically. Our journey has led us to witness a correlation that is as odd as a three-legged cat trying to master the waltz.

As we unveil the results of our intrepid expedition, let us not forget that statistical significance and humor are not mutually exclusive. The aim of this paper is not only to present our findings but also to shed light on the unexpected and infuse a touch of levity into the realm of academic inquiry. So, buckle up and join us on this rollercoaster ride into the intersection of political allegiance and the luck of the draw.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico and Mega millions lottery numbers. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Blazing Blue and Red Correlation: Exploring the Interplay Between Republican Votes for Senators and Mega Millions Lottery Numbers in New Mexico

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious connection between Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico and the Mega Millions lottery numbers. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery, we aimed to uncover any potential correlations between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. To our surprise, our analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.8899133 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2020. The findings of this study, while undeniably entertaining, shed light on a truly unusual correlation that defies conventional logic. We aim to spark further investigation and discussion in the realm of political voting patterns and lottery number selections, prompting a more lighthearted perspective on the intersection of politics and chance.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Politics and probability are not typically bedfellows, but our research has uncovered a correlation that is as unlikely as winning the lottery itself. While many may wager that the selection of lottery numbers and political preferences are as related as a fish and a bicycle, our findings beg to differ. We have embarked on a quest that marries the red and blue of political affiliations with the numbers game of Mega Millions in the enchanting state of New Mexico.
Picture this: a fervent Republican voter strolls into the polling station, casts their ballot, and then, just for a bit of extra luck, purchases a ticket for the Mega Millions. Little do they know, there may be an invisible thread tying their political allegiance to their lottery number choices. The notion might seem as preposterous as a unicorn entering a horse race, but our investigation is here to reveal the unexpected.
We have dived headfirst into the sea of data, navigating the labyrinth of numbers and ballots as if on a treasure hunt for an elusive connection. Armed with datasets from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery, we explored the terrain, both statistically and geographically. Our journey has led us to witness a correlation that is as odd as a three-legged cat trying to master the waltz.
As we unveil the results of our intrepid expedition, let us not forget that statistical significance and humor are not mutually exclusive. The aim of this paper is not only to present our findings but also to shed light on the unexpected and infuse a touch of levity into the realm of academic inquiry. So, buckle up and join us on this rollercoaster ride into the intersection of political allegiance and the luck of the draw.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In the pursuit of understanding the enigmatic correlation between Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico and Mega Millions lottery numbers, the scholarly landscape offers a variety of perspectives and insights. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of political voting patterns and uncovered intricate links with societal behaviors, laying the groundwork for our examination of the intersection between politics and chance. Doe's work (2017) delved into the psychology of decision-making, providing valuable context for our exploration of the whimsical nature of lottery number selections in relation to political affiliation. Jones's investigation (2019) into statistical anomalies in unrelated phenomena has also proven to be instructive, offering a framework for our own unexpected findings in the realm of the improbable.

Turning to relevant non-fiction literature, "The Power of Luck: Understanding Randomness in Politics" by Random and Chance (2018) offers intriguing perspectives on the role of chance in political events, inviting us to ponder the whims of fate in the world of governance. Similarly, "The Politics of Probability: A Game of Red and Blue" by Numbers and Votes (2016) presents a thought-provoking analysis of the improbable interplay between political allegiances and numerical chance, setting the stage for our investigation of the New Mexican conundrum.

In the realm of fiction, we encounter works that, while not directly addressing our specific research questions, provide amusing analogies and whimsical musings that align with the spirit of our inquiry. "The Serendipitous Senator: A Tale of Wins and Whimsy" by Chance and Destiny (2005) lightheartedly explores the unlikely twists of political fortune, akin to the unpredictable nature of lottery numbers. Additionally, "Lottery Liaisons: When Politics Meets Probability" by Odds and Ends (2012) presents a fanciful narrative that touches on the whimsical dance between chance and political preferences, offering a delightful parallel to our findings in New Mexico.

Furthermore, the insights gleaned from social media discourse have added an unexpected dimension to our understanding of the interplay between Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico and Mega Millions lottery numbers. A tweet by @PoliticLottoEnthusiast proclaimed, "I always pick my lottery numbers based on my voting district's Republican support - it's my own red and white (or blue) game!" This sentiment, while light-hearted, echoes the curious intertwining of political identity and lottery number selection that we have uncovered in our research.

In light of these varied sources, we embark on our own exploration with a lighthearted spirit, recognizing that the intersection of political allegiance and the luck of the draw is a realm of the unexpected and the whimsical.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico and Mega millions lottery numbers. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and NY Mega Millions Lottery . You used data from 2002 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Blazing Blue and Red Correlation: Exploring the Interplay Between Republican Votes for Senators and Mega Millions Lottery Numbers in New Mexico

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious connection between Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico and the Mega Millions lottery numbers. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery, we aimed to uncover any potential correlations between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. To our surprise, our analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.8899133 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2020. The findings of this study, while undeniably entertaining, shed light on a truly unusual correlation that defies conventional logic. We aim to spark further investigation and discussion in the realm of political voting patterns and lottery number selections, prompting a more lighthearted perspective on the intersection of politics and chance.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Politics and probability are not typically bedfellows, but our research has uncovered a correlation that is as unlikely as winning the lottery itself. While many may wager that the selection of lottery numbers and political preferences are as related as a fish and a bicycle, our findings beg to differ. We have embarked on a quest that marries the red and blue of political affiliations with the numbers game of Mega Millions in the enchanting state of New Mexico.
Picture this: a fervent Republican voter strolls into the polling station, casts their ballot, and then, just for a bit of extra luck, purchases a ticket for the Mega Millions. Little do they know, there may be an invisible thread tying their political allegiance to their lottery number choices. The notion might seem as preposterous as a unicorn entering a horse race, but our investigation is here to reveal the unexpected.
We have dived headfirst into the sea of data, navigating the labyrinth of numbers and ballots as if on a treasure hunt for an elusive connection. Armed with datasets from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery, we explored the terrain, both statistically and geographically. Our journey has led us to witness a correlation that is as odd as a three-legged cat trying to master the waltz.
As we unveil the results of our intrepid expedition, let us not forget that statistical significance and humor are not mutually exclusive. The aim of this paper is not only to present our findings but also to shed light on the unexpected and infuse a touch of levity into the realm of academic inquiry. So, buckle up and join us on this rollercoaster ride into the intersection of political allegiance and the luck of the draw.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

How do you even begin to unravel the enigmatic web of intertwining Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico and Mega Millions lottery numbers? Well, the answer is not as clear-cut as picking the winning lottery numbers, but we'll give it a shot. Our approach involved a hodgepodge of statistical analysis, data wrangling, and a sprinkle of whimsy – because why should research be completely devoid of fun?

Data Collection
We embarked on a cyber treasure hunt, scouring the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery databases. It was like trying to find a needle in a haystack, only the needle was made of political data and the haystack was an endless sea of lottery numbers. With data spanning from 2002 to 2020, we navigated through the digital jungle, braving the perils of incompatible file formats and missing data.

Statistical Wizardry
With our trusty statistical software in hand, we set out to crunch numbers like a hungry mathematician at an all-you-can-eat buffet. We employed correlation analyses, regression models, and other statistical sorcery to uncover any hidden relationships between the Republican votes for Senators and the elusive Mega Millions numbers. Our goal was to shine a light on a connection that was as unexpected as finding a talking parrot in a library – a true anomaly in the realm of empirical enquiry.

Geospatial Mapping
Once we gathered and tamed the wild data beasts, we turned our attention to geographic patterns. Armed with geographic information systems (GIS) tools, we mapped the geographical distribution of Republican votes and Mega Millions players in New Mexico. It was like creating a digital treasure map, marking the territories where political fervor intertwined with the lure of the jackpot.

Mind-Reading and Crystal Balls
Okay, just kidding. There was no actual mind-reading involved in our methodology (unfortunately). But we did aim to unravel the mysteries of human behavior and decision-making. Through our analysis, we delved into the realm of probability and partisan preference, attempting to decipher any underlying patterns and trends that could elucidate the curious connection between political allegiance and lottery number selection.

By blending statistical rigour with a sprinkle of whimsy, our methodology aimed to bring a breath of fresh air into the often solemn world of academic research. Our journey into the heart of this quirky correlation was fraught with challenges and surprises, but no quest for knowledge is complete without a touch of mirth. So, onward we marched, armed with data, wit, and a healthy dose of curiosity, to uncover the enigmatic dance between the red and blue of politics and the numbers game.

Stay tuned for the thrilling reveal of our findings in the upcoming sections – because what's research without a hearty dose of anticipation?

End of Response


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico and Mega millions lottery numbers. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and NY Mega Millions Lottery .

For the time period 2002 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8899133, r-squared of 0.7919457, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Blazing Blue and Red Correlation: Exploring the Interplay Between Republican Votes for Senators and Mega Millions Lottery Numbers in New Mexico

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious connection between Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico and the Mega Millions lottery numbers. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery, we aimed to uncover any potential correlations between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. To our surprise, our analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.8899133 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2020. The findings of this study, while undeniably entertaining, shed light on a truly unusual correlation that defies conventional logic. We aim to spark further investigation and discussion in the realm of political voting patterns and lottery number selections, prompting a more lighthearted perspective on the intersection of politics and chance.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
Politics and probability are not typically bedfellows, but our research has uncovered a correlation that is as unlikely as winning the lottery itself. While many may wager that the selection of lottery numbers and political preferences are as related as a fish and a bicycle, our findings beg to differ. We have embarked on a quest that marries the red and blue of political affiliations with the numbers game of Mega Millions in the enchanting state of New Mexico.
Picture this: a fervent Republican voter strolls into the polling station, casts their ballot, and then, just for a bit of extra luck, purchases a ticket for the Mega Millions. Little do they know, there may be an invisible thread tying their political allegiance to their lottery number choices. The notion might seem as preposterous as a unicorn entering a horse race, but our investigation is here to reveal the unexpected.
We have dived headfirst into the sea of data, navigating the labyrinth of numbers and ballots as if on a treasure hunt for an elusive connection. Armed with datasets from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery, we explored the terrain, both statistically and geographically. Our journey has led us to witness a correlation that is as odd as a three-legged cat trying to master the waltz.
As we unveil the results of our intrepid expedition, let us not forget that statistical significance and humor are not mutually exclusive. The aim of this paper is not only to present our findings but also to shed light on the unexpected and infuse a touch of levity into the realm of academic inquiry. So, buckle up and join us on this rollercoaster ride into the intersection of political allegiance and the luck of the draw.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the data gathered from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery has yielded some truly remarkable findings. Our exploration of the relationship between Republican votes for Senators and Mega Millions lottery numbers in New Mexico has resulted in a correlation coefficient of 0.8899133, an r-squared value of 0.7919457, and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period between 2002 and 2020.

Figure 1 presents a scatterplot depicting the robust correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, providing undeniable evidence of a connection that is as surprising as finding a full set of matching socks in the laundry.

These results suggest that there is a strong association between the voting behavior of New Mexico Republicans and their lottery number choices. This correlation is about as unexpected as finding a needle in a haystack or a vegan at a barbecue – truly a delightful twist of fate in the realm of statistical analysis!

In summary, our findings provide compelling evidence of a connection between political allegiance and the enigmatic realm of lottery number selection. These results, while undoubtedly raising eyebrows, cast a humorous light on the interplay between chance and choice. We hope that our research prompts a chuckle or two and sparks further investigation into the intriguing intersection of politics and probability.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico and Mega millions lottery numbers. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Blazing Blue and Red Correlation: Exploring the Interplay Between Republican Votes for Senators and Mega Millions Lottery Numbers in New Mexico

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious connection between Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico and the Mega Millions lottery numbers. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery, we aimed to uncover any potential correlations between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. To our surprise, our analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.8899133 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2020. The findings of this study, while undeniably entertaining, shed light on a truly unusual correlation that defies conventional logic. We aim to spark further investigation and discussion in the realm of political voting patterns and lottery number selections, prompting a more lighthearted perspective on the intersection of politics and chance.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the pursuit of understanding the enigmatic correlation between Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico and Mega Millions lottery numbers, the scholarly landscape offers a variety of perspectives and insights. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of political voting patterns and uncovered intricate links with societal behaviors, laying the groundwork for our examination of the intersection between politics and chance. Doe's work (2017) delved into the psychology of decision-making, providing valuable context for our exploration of the whimsical nature of lottery number selections in relation to political affiliation. Jones's investigation (2019) into statistical anomalies in unrelated phenomena has also proven to be instructive, offering a framework for our own unexpected findings in the realm of the improbable.
Turning to relevant non-fiction literature, "The Power of Luck: Understanding Randomness in Politics" by Random and Chance (2018) offers intriguing perspectives on the role of chance in political events, inviting us to ponder the whims of fate in the world of governance. Similarly, "The Politics of Probability: A Game of Red and Blue" by Numbers and Votes (2016) presents a thought-provoking analysis of the improbable interplay between political allegiances and numerical chance, setting the stage for our investigation of the New Mexican conundrum.
In the realm of fiction, we encounter works that, while not directly addressing our specific research questions, provide amusing analogies and whimsical musings that align with the spirit of our inquiry. "The Serendipitous Senator: A Tale of Wins and Whimsy" by Chance and Destiny (2005) lightheartedly explores the unlikely twists of political fortune, akin to the unpredictable nature of lottery numbers. Additionally, "Lottery Liaisons: When Politics Meets Probability" by Odds and Ends (2012) presents a fanciful narrative that touches on the whimsical dance between chance and political preferences, offering a delightful parallel to our findings in New Mexico.
Furthermore, the insights gleaned from social media discourse have added an unexpected dimension to our understanding of the interplay between Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico and Mega Millions lottery numbers. A tweet by @PoliticLottoEnthusiast proclaimed, "I always pick my lottery numbers based on my voting district's Republican support - it's my own red and white (or blue) game!" This sentiment, while light-hearted, echoes the curious intertwining of political identity and lottery number selection that we have uncovered in our research.
In light of these varied sources, we embark on our own exploration with a lighthearted spirit, recognizing that the intersection of political allegiance and the luck of the draw is a realm of the unexpected and the whimsical.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data gathered from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery has yielded some truly remarkable findings. Our exploration of the relationship between Republican votes for Senators and Mega Millions lottery numbers in New Mexico has resulted in a correlation coefficient of 0.8899133, an r-squared value of 0.7919457, and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period between 2002 and 2020.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot depicting the robust correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, providing undeniable evidence of a connection that is as surprising as finding a full set of matching socks in the laundry.
These results suggest that there is a strong association between the voting behavior of New Mexico Republicans and their lottery number choices. This correlation is about as unexpected as finding a needle in a haystack or a vegan at a barbecue – truly a delightful twist of fate in the realm of statistical analysis!
In summary, our findings provide compelling evidence of a connection between political allegiance and the enigmatic realm of lottery number selection. These results, while undoubtedly raising eyebrows, cast a humorous light on the interplay between chance and choice. We hope that our research prompts a chuckle or two and sparks further investigation into the intriguing intersection of politics and probability.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has barbecued up a sizzling revelation that would make even the most ardent skeptic raise an eyebrow – the unexpected and robust correlation between Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico and the Mega Millions lottery numbers. Just as Dorothy discovered that there's no place like home, our statistical analysis unveiled that there's no correlation like the one we found!

Our results provide empirical backing to the previously whimsical musings of "The Serendipitous Senator: A Tale of Wins and Whimsy" by Chance and Destiny (2005) and "Lottery Liaisons: When Politics Meets Probability" by Odds and Ends (2012). These quirky literary works, while initially perceived as flights of fancy, have come to embody the spirit of our unexpected findings. Similarly, the seemingly facetious tweet by @PoliticLottoEnthusiast, with its red and white (or blue) game, has inadvertently encapsulated the essence of our discoveries, transforming it from a light-hearted remark into a prescient observation.

Our analysis not only supports the existing literature but also adds a formidable punchline to this unusual saga. The robust correlation coefficient and the p-value less than 0.01 highlight the significant relationship between political allegiance and the selection of lottery numbers. This revelation is as staggering as stumbling upon a unicorn in a petting zoo or discovering a politician with a genuine, unalloyed sense of humor. Our findings go beyond mere statistical significance; they illustrate the delightful dance between political affiliation and numerical chance, painting a picture of an unexpected connection that defies conventional logic.

Utilizing the Socratic method and unraveling clues from these research findings, we hope to ignite a fervor for further exploration and analysis in the realm of political voting patterns and lottery number selections, perhaps fostering a more whimsical perspective on the intersection of politics and chance. After all, in the grand stage of statistics, the unexpected connection we've uncovered is as surprising as winning the lottery with numbers that match your political beliefs!

Our quest for understanding the improbable interplay between politics and probability has revealed a curious symphony of red and blue, imbuing our scholarly pursuit with an enchanting spirit of lightheartedness and discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico and Mega millions lottery numbers. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Blazing Blue and Red Correlation: Exploring the Interplay Between Republican Votes for Senators and Mega Millions Lottery Numbers in New Mexico

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious connection between Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico and the Mega Millions lottery numbers. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery, we aimed to uncover any potential correlations between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. To our surprise, our analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.8899133 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2020. The findings of this study, while undeniably entertaining, shed light on a truly unusual correlation that defies conventional logic. We aim to spark further investigation and discussion in the realm of political voting patterns and lottery number selections, prompting a more lighthearted perspective on the intersection of politics and chance.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Politics and probability are not typically bedfellows, but our research has uncovered a correlation that is as unlikely as winning the lottery itself. While many may wager that the selection of lottery numbers and political preferences are as related as a fish and a bicycle, our findings beg to differ. We have embarked on a quest that marries the red and blue of political affiliations with the numbers game of Mega Millions in the enchanting state of New Mexico.
Picture this: a fervent Republican voter strolls into the polling station, casts their ballot, and then, just for a bit of extra luck, purchases a ticket for the Mega Millions. Little do they know, there may be an invisible thread tying their political allegiance to their lottery number choices. The notion might seem as preposterous as a unicorn entering a horse race, but our investigation is here to reveal the unexpected.
We have dived headfirst into the sea of data, navigating the labyrinth of numbers and ballots as if on a treasure hunt for an elusive connection. Armed with datasets from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery, we explored the terrain, both statistically and geographically. Our journey has led us to witness a correlation that is as odd as a three-legged cat trying to master the waltz.
As we unveil the results of our intrepid expedition, let us not forget that statistical significance and humor are not mutually exclusive. The aim of this paper is not only to present our findings but also to shed light on the unexpected and infuse a touch of levity into the realm of academic inquiry. So, buckle up and join us on this rollercoaster ride into the intersection of political allegiance and the luck of the draw.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data gathered from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery has yielded some truly remarkable findings. Our exploration of the relationship between Republican votes for Senators and Mega Millions lottery numbers in New Mexico has resulted in a correlation coefficient of 0.8899133, an r-squared value of 0.7919457, and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period between 2002 and 2020.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot depicting the robust correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, providing undeniable evidence of a connection that is as surprising as finding a full set of matching socks in the laundry.
These results suggest that there is a strong association between the voting behavior of New Mexico Republicans and their lottery number choices. This correlation is about as unexpected as finding a needle in a haystack or a vegan at a barbecue – truly a delightful twist of fate in the realm of statistical analysis!
In summary, our findings provide compelling evidence of a connection between political allegiance and the enigmatic realm of lottery number selection. These results, while undoubtedly raising eyebrows, cast a humorous light on the interplay between chance and choice. We hope that our research prompts a chuckle or two and sparks further investigation into the intriguing intersection of politics and probability.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unraveled a correlation that is as surprising as finding a pineapple on a pizza – a spectacle that challenges conventional expectations. The robust statistical evidence of a strong association between Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico and Mega Millions lottery numbers showcases a remarkable fusion of politics and chance. It's like witnessing a flamingo in a flock of pigeons – an unexpected and visually arresting spectacle that defies the norm.

This study not only highlights an amusing intersection between political allegiance and lottery number selection but also serves as a reminder that statistical significance can often come with an unexpected punchline. It's akin to stumbling upon a secret treasure map at the bottom of a cereal box – a delightful and improbable discovery that adds a touch of whimsy to the world of research.

While our findings may raise eyebrows and prompt a few chuckles, they also call attention to the sheer unpredictability of human behavior and decision-making. In the grand scheme of academic inquiry, this unusual correlation serves as a lighthearted reminder that the pursuit of knowledge can also bring a dash of mirth and wonder.

With that, we confidently assert that no further research is needed in this area. After all, some mysteries are best left as delightful enigma, much like the odd pairing of politics and lottery numbers in the Land of Enchantment. It's like a perfectly timed punchline that needs no follow-up – an unexpected conclusion to a most unusual study.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Blazing Blue and Red Correlation: Exploring the Interplay Between Republican Votes for Senators and Mega Millions Lottery Numbers in New Mexico. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Political Probability


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Blazing Blue and Red Correlation: Exploring the Interplay Between Republican Votes for Senators and Mega Millions Lottery Numbers in New Mexico. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Extraterrestrial Sociology and Statistical Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Blazing Blue and Red Correlation: Exploring the Interplay Between Republican Votes for Senators and Mega Millions Lottery Numbers in New Mexico with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the curious connection between Republican votes for Senators in New Mexico and the Mega Millions lottery numbers. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery, we aimed to uncover any potential correlations between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. To our surprise, our analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.8899133 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2020. The findings of this study, while undeniably entertaining, shed light on a truly unusual correlation that defies conventional logic. We aim to spark further investigation and discussion in the realm of political voting patterns and lottery number selections, prompting a more lighthearted perspective on the intersection of politics and chance.

ChatGPT:

Republican votes, Senators, New Mexico, Mega Millions, lottery numbers, correlation, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, NY Mega Millions Lottery, correlation coefficient, p-value, political voting patterns, chance, data analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Republican Senators in New Mexico
Detailed data title: Total number of votes cast for Federal Republican Senate candidates in New Mexico
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Republican Senators in New Mexico

Mega millions lottery numbers
Detailed data title: Second smallest winning Mega Millions Megaball number on the last draw of the year
Source: NY Mega Millions Lottery
See what else correlates with Mega millions lottery numbers

Correlation r = 0.8899133 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7919457 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 79.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Mega millions lottery numbers) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Republican Senators in New Mexico) over the 7 years from 2002 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0073. 0.0072725290356136760000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 0.73% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 138 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 6 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 6 because we have two variables measured over a period of 7 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.41, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2002200620082012201420182020
Votes for Republican Senators in New Mexico (Total votes)314193163826318522351260229097212813418483
Mega millions lottery numbers (Megaball number)214221371031




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([314193,163826,318522,351260,229097,212813,418483,])
array_2 = np.array([21,4,22,13,7,10,31,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Republican Senators in New Mexico"
array_2_name = "Mega millions lottery numbers"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 5057 · Black Variable ID: 26286 · Red Variable ID: 893
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0