Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the number of Libertarian votes in Idaho rose, so did the demand for a hands-off approach to government regulation. This led car manufacturers to adopt a more laissez-faire attitude towards airbag safety standards, ultimately resulting in a surge of automotive recalls for airbag malfunctions. It's as if the invisible hand of the free market was too busy making campaign donations to ensure quality control! Remember, when it comes to political impact on automotive safety, sometimes it's a real stretch to connect the dots!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [Data cyber art]: Create an image of a futuristic cityscape with sleek, avant-garde buildings that are illuminated with neon lights. In the foreground, depict a bustling street filled with autonomous vehicles, all different in make and model. Some vehicles have a glitchy, distorted appearance, indicating their faulty airbags. The city shows signs of technological advancement, with holographic billboards depicting the Libertarian candidate's campaign alongside advertisements for the latest cars. The scene should convey a seamless integration of politics and automotive industry within a cutting-edge urban environment. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Sci-fi fantacy A Discovery magazine cover image Data cyber art inspired by bauhaus A scene from Skyrim
ChatGPT: Data cyber art
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags, in the following situation: As the number of Libertarian votes in Idaho rose, so did the demand for a hands-off approach to government regulation. This led car manufacturers to adopt a more laissez-faire attitude towards airbag safety standards, ultimately resulting in a surge of automotive recalls for airbag malfunctions. It's as if the invisible hand of the free market was too busy making campaign donations to ensure quality control! Remember, when it comes to political impact on automotive safety, sometimes it's a real stretch to connect the dots!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Idaho, more and more people cast their votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate. At the same time, car manufacturers embraced a hands-off approach to government regulation. In the background, cars with faulty airbags were being recalled and pulled off the road, creating a surge of automotive recalls. The scene represents a growing political influence on automotive safety, as the invisible hand of the free market seemed to be making its presence felt in unexpected ways.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Data cyber art ] and depicting this scene: In Idaho, more and more people cast their votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate. At the same time, car manufacturers embraced a hands-off approach to government regulation. In the background, cars with faulty airbags were being recalled and pulled off the road, creating a surge of automotive recalls. The scene represents a growing political influence on automotive safety, as the invisible hand of the free market seemed to be making its presence felt in unexpected ways. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [Data cyber art]: Create an image of a futuristic cityscape with sleek, avant-garde buildings that are illuminated with neon lights. In the foreground, depict a bustling street filled with autonomous vehicles, all different in make and model. Some vehicles have a glitchy, distorted appearance, indicating their faulty airbags. The city shows signs of technological advancement, with holographic billboards depicting the Libertarian candidate's campaign alongside advertisements for the latest cars. The scene should convey a seamless integration of politics and automotive industry within a cutting-edge urban environment.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho caused Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags to increase. Make it feel plausible.
AI academic paper
Tote the Libertarian Votes in Idaho and Automotive Air Bag Recalls: A Curious Correlation The Journal of Quirky Correlations Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Rhyme words in the title.
Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9816129 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2020.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Tote the Libertarian Votes in Idaho and Automotive Air Bag Recalls: A Curious Correlation
[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and automotive recalls for issues with air bags has been a topic of peculiar interest. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, this study aims to shed light on this compelling correlation. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9816129 and a level of statistical significance denoted by p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1990 to 2020. The findings of this investigation may raise eyebrows and prompt further inquiry into the peculiar patterns observed, challenging traditional assumptions about the interconnectedness of automotive safety and political preferences. Our research seeks not to inflate the significance of these findings but simply to air out the unexpected relationship between seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Tote the Libertarian Votes in Idaho and Automotive Air Bag Recalls: A Curious Correlation
[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and automotive recalls for issues with air bags has been a topic of peculiar interest. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, this study aims to shed light on this compelling correlation. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9816129 and a level of statistical significance denoted by p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1990 to 2020. The findings of this investigation may raise eyebrows and prompt further inquiry into the peculiar patterns observed, challenging traditional assumptions about the interconnectedness of automotive safety and political preferences. Our research seeks not to inflate the significance of these findings but simply to air out the unexpected relationship between seemingly unrelated phenomena.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intricate and often unpredictable web of societal dynamics has long captivated the minds of researchers across various disciplines. Our quest for understanding often leads us to investigate seemingly disparate phenomena, hoping to uncover the hidden threads that tie them together. In this spirit of inquiry, we delve into the peculiar connection between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and the occurrence of automotive recalls pertaining to air bag malfunctions. While this correlation may initially appear as incongruous as pairing fuchsia with chartreuse, our empirical analysis yields a remarkable association that demands attention.
The notion of political preferences intersecting with automotive safety concerns may at first glance appear as implausible as a unicorn sighting in a crowded metropolis. However, as practitioners of data-driven inquiry, we must be diligent in exploring even the most whimsical correlations to discern whether there is genuine substance behind the initial bewilderment.
Our investigation draws upon data culled from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, meticulously examining the span of time from 1990 to 2020. Through the application of rigorous statistical methodologies, we have unearthed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9816129, signifying a degree of association that is, to invoke a colloquial expression, as tight as a jar lid that refuses to budge. Furthermore, the level of statistical significance, denoted by a p-value less than 0.01, provides clear evidence that this correlation is not merely a whimsical anomaly.
It is important to underscore that our research seeks to elucidate rather than magnify the significance of these findings. We maintain a steadfast commitment to the pursuit of empirical truth and scientific inquiry, understanding that sometimes reality unfolds in ways that tickle our curiosity and defy conventional expectations.
As we embark on this expedition of unraveling the enigmatic entwinement of political allegiances and automotive perils, we invite fellow scholars to join us in this voyage. The unsettling yet captivating correlation we have uncovered is ripe for further exploration and analysis, beckoning us to question preconceived notions and embrace the delightful unpredictability of the academic pursuit.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will detail the methodological approaches employed, present the empirical findings in all their astounding glory, and offer contemplative discussions on the implications of this correlation. Our hope is that our endeavor will provoke laughter at the sheer absurdity of the connection, but also spark rigorous intellectual inquiry that transcends the conventional boundaries of disciplinary silos.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Tote the Libertarian Votes in Idaho and Automotive Air Bag Recalls: A Curious Correlation
[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and automotive recalls for issues with air bags has been a topic of peculiar interest. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, this study aims to shed light on this compelling correlation. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9816129 and a level of statistical significance denoted by p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1990 to 2020. The findings of this investigation may raise eyebrows and prompt further inquiry into the peculiar patterns observed, challenging traditional assumptions about the interconnectedness of automotive safety and political preferences. Our research seeks not to inflate the significance of these findings but simply to air out the unexpected relationship between seemingly unrelated phenomena.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intricate and often unpredictable web of societal dynamics has long captivated the minds of researchers across various disciplines. Our quest for understanding often leads us to investigate seemingly disparate phenomena, hoping to uncover the hidden threads that tie them together. In this spirit of inquiry, we delve into the peculiar connection between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and the occurrence of automotive recalls pertaining to air bag malfunctions. While this correlation may initially appear as incongruous as pairing fuchsia with chartreuse, our empirical analysis yields a remarkable association that demands attention.
The notion of political preferences intersecting with automotive safety concerns may at first glance appear as implausible as a unicorn sighting in a crowded metropolis. However, as practitioners of data-driven inquiry, we must be diligent in exploring even the most whimsical correlations to discern whether there is genuine substance behind the initial bewilderment.
Our investigation draws upon data culled from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, meticulously examining the span of time from 1990 to 2020. Through the application of rigorous statistical methodologies, we have unearthed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9816129, signifying a degree of association that is, to invoke a colloquial expression, as tight as a jar lid that refuses to budge. Furthermore, the level of statistical significance, denoted by a p-value less than 0.01, provides clear evidence that this correlation is not merely a whimsical anomaly.
It is important to underscore that our research seeks to elucidate rather than magnify the significance of these findings. We maintain a steadfast commitment to the pursuit of empirical truth and scientific inquiry, understanding that sometimes reality unfolds in ways that tickle our curiosity and defy conventional expectations.
As we embark on this expedition of unraveling the enigmatic entwinement of political allegiances and automotive perils, we invite fellow scholars to join us in this voyage. The unsettling yet captivating correlation we have uncovered is ripe for further exploration and analysis, beckoning us to question preconceived notions and embrace the delightful unpredictability of the academic pursuit.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will detail the methodological approaches employed, present the empirical findings in all their astounding glory, and offer contemplative discussions on the implications of this correlation. Our hope is that our endeavor will provoke laughter at the sheer absurdity of the connection, but also spark rigorous intellectual inquiry that transcends the conventional boundaries of disciplinary silos.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The authors find that the relationship between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and automotive recalls for issues with air bags has sparked considerable curiosity and bemusement among researchers and scholars. Numerous studies have sought to probe the potential links between political leanings and automotive safety concerns, despite the seemingly improbable nature of such a correlation.
Smith (2015) examines the broader intersection of political affiliations with consumer behaviors and preferences, delving into the influence of ideological inclinations on purchasing decisions. While Smith's work does not directly address the specific nexus of political votes and automotive recalls, it does lay a foundation for exploring the ways in which political allegiances may permeate various facets of consumer choices and experiences.
Doe (2018) takes a different approach, presenting a comprehensive analysis of automotive recalls and their impact on consumer trust in the automobile industry. The study offers valuable insights into the ramifications of safety issues on consumer perceptions, shedding light on the potential ripple effects that may stem from publicized automotive defects. While Doe's work does not touch upon the political dimensions of recalls, it underscores the broader significance of safety-related concerns in shaping consumer attitudes and market dynamics.
Moving beyond the confines of scholarly articles, prominent non-fiction works such as "The Politics of Automobiles" (Jones, 2017) and "Libertarianism Unleashed" (Johnson, 2019) indirectly traverse the realm of our inquiry. Though their primary focus lies elsewhere, these publications offer nuanced perspectives on the societal, political, and economic landscapes that intersect with our research interests. The multifaceted nature of these works serves as a reminder that seemingly divergent topics may interweave in unexpected and thought-provoking ways.
In the realm of fiction, titles such as "The Airbag Chronicles" (Smith, 2006) and "The Libertarian Driver's Dilemma" (Doe, 2014) exude an air of whimsy and imagination, transporting readers into realms where air bags and political ideologies collide in fantastical narratives. While these fictional accounts may not offer empirical or scholarly insights, they contribute to the broader cultural exploration of themes that echo, however distantly, the peculiar relationship we seek to unravel.
As the literature survey expands its horizons, it ventures into unorthodox territories, drawing inspiration from an assortment of sources that extend beyond traditional academic realms. It is here that the authors unabashedly admit to perusing an array of eclectic materials, including but not limited to the backs of shampoo bottles, fortune cookie messages, and the whimsical musings of zealous conspiracy theorists. While these sources may raise eyebrows and elicit a chuckle or two, they serve as a poignant reminder of the unanticipated avenues from which inspiration and insight can manifest.
In the pursuit of academic inquiry, it is crucial to embrace the unforeseen, the offbeat, and the seemingly preposterous, recognizing that knowledge and wisdom are often concealed in the most improbable of places. With our literature review meandering through both the conventional and the unconventional, we earnestly invite fellow scholars to join us in this merry expedition of discovery, where the unexpected connections are as abundant as grains of sand on a whimsical beach.
Though this literature review may raise a wry smile or two, its underlying message remains steadfast - the pursuit of knowledge and truth transcends the boundaries of convention, leading us to marvel at the delightful absurdity of academia while steadfastly seeking the lamp of reason amidst the shadows of whimsy.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT . You used data from 1990 to 2020
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Tote the Libertarian Votes in Idaho and Automotive Air Bag Recalls: A Curious Correlation
[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and automotive recalls for issues with air bags has been a topic of peculiar interest. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, this study aims to shed light on this compelling correlation. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9816129 and a level of statistical significance denoted by p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1990 to 2020. The findings of this investigation may raise eyebrows and prompt further inquiry into the peculiar patterns observed, challenging traditional assumptions about the interconnectedness of automotive safety and political preferences. Our research seeks not to inflate the significance of these findings but simply to air out the unexpected relationship between seemingly unrelated phenomena.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intricate and often unpredictable web of societal dynamics has long captivated the minds of researchers across various disciplines. Our quest for understanding often leads us to investigate seemingly disparate phenomena, hoping to uncover the hidden threads that tie them together. In this spirit of inquiry, we delve into the peculiar connection between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and the occurrence of automotive recalls pertaining to air bag malfunctions. While this correlation may initially appear as incongruous as pairing fuchsia with chartreuse, our empirical analysis yields a remarkable association that demands attention.
The notion of political preferences intersecting with automotive safety concerns may at first glance appear as implausible as a unicorn sighting in a crowded metropolis. However, as practitioners of data-driven inquiry, we must be diligent in exploring even the most whimsical correlations to discern whether there is genuine substance behind the initial bewilderment.
Our investigation draws upon data culled from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, meticulously examining the span of time from 1990 to 2020. Through the application of rigorous statistical methodologies, we have unearthed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9816129, signifying a degree of association that is, to invoke a colloquial expression, as tight as a jar lid that refuses to budge. Furthermore, the level of statistical significance, denoted by a p-value less than 0.01, provides clear evidence that this correlation is not merely a whimsical anomaly.
It is important to underscore that our research seeks to elucidate rather than magnify the significance of these findings. We maintain a steadfast commitment to the pursuit of empirical truth and scientific inquiry, understanding that sometimes reality unfolds in ways that tickle our curiosity and defy conventional expectations.
As we embark on this expedition of unraveling the enigmatic entwinement of political allegiances and automotive perils, we invite fellow scholars to join us in this voyage. The unsettling yet captivating correlation we have uncovered is ripe for further exploration and analysis, beckoning us to question preconceived notions and embrace the delightful unpredictability of the academic pursuit.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will detail the methodological approaches employed, present the empirical findings in all their astounding glory, and offer contemplative discussions on the implications of this correlation. Our hope is that our endeavor will provoke laughter at the sheer absurdity of the connection, but also spark rigorous intellectual inquiry that transcends the conventional boundaries of disciplinary silos.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To traverse the convoluted terrain of this peculiar inquiry, our research team undertook an assortment of methodological approaches that would make even the most seasoned statisticians arch an eyebrow. The data sources for this study were meticulously selected to ensure comprehensiveness and integrity, drawing primarily from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, the Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, like intrepid explorers scavenging for treasure in the vast expanse of the virtual domain.
The statistical analysis commenced with the extraction of Libertarian Presidential candidate votes in the state of Idaho, spanning the years from 1990 to 2020, a period rife with political intrigue and automotive adventurism. Simultaneously, data regarding automotive recalls specifically pertaining to air bag malfunctions were meticulously compiled, reflecting the tumultuous journey of vehicular safety within the same temporal confines.
Employing the time-honored and cherished method of cross-correlation analysis, our team endeavored to discern the interplay between these seemingly disparate datasets, using statistical software that could rival the cognitive acumen of the sharpest human minds. This exacting process demanded a fusion of mathematical prowess and computational wizardry, akin to the delicate art of tightrope walking while juggling data points.
The resulting correlation coefficient, reminiscent of a Damascus blade gleaming in the sunlight, reflected a prodigious magnitude of 0.9816129, suggesting a connection as robust as a trusty seatbelt securing a cherished passenger. Furthermore, this correlation was accompanied by a level of statistical significance denoted by a p-value less than 0.01, a realization that carries the weight of an elephant in a room of mouse-sized statistical anomalies.
While we approached this investigation with measured caution and the respect befitting an enigmatic wonder of the academic world, we cannot deny the lingering sense of awe and bemusement that permeated our research sanctuary. Our methodology, while rigorously anchored in scholarly traditions, embraced the charming unpredictability of the findings, reminding us that scientific inquiry, much like life itself, often unfolds with a tantalizing blend of certainty and serendipity.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and US DOT .
For the time period 1990 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9816129, r-squared of 0.9635639, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Tote the Libertarian Votes in Idaho and Automotive Air Bag Recalls: A Curious Correlation
[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and automotive recalls for issues with air bags has been a topic of peculiar interest. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, this study aims to shed light on this compelling correlation. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9816129 and a level of statistical significance denoted by p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1990 to 2020. The findings of this investigation may raise eyebrows and prompt further inquiry into the peculiar patterns observed, challenging traditional assumptions about the interconnectedness of automotive safety and political preferences. Our research seeks not to inflate the significance of these findings but simply to air out the unexpected relationship between seemingly unrelated phenomena.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intricate and often unpredictable web of societal dynamics has long captivated the minds of researchers across various disciplines. Our quest for understanding often leads us to investigate seemingly disparate phenomena, hoping to uncover the hidden threads that tie them together. In this spirit of inquiry, we delve into the peculiar connection between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and the occurrence of automotive recalls pertaining to air bag malfunctions. While this correlation may initially appear as incongruous as pairing fuchsia with chartreuse, our empirical analysis yields a remarkable association that demands attention.
The notion of political preferences intersecting with automotive safety concerns may at first glance appear as implausible as a unicorn sighting in a crowded metropolis. However, as practitioners of data-driven inquiry, we must be diligent in exploring even the most whimsical correlations to discern whether there is genuine substance behind the initial bewilderment.
Our investigation draws upon data culled from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, meticulously examining the span of time from 1990 to 2020. Through the application of rigorous statistical methodologies, we have unearthed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9816129, signifying a degree of association that is, to invoke a colloquial expression, as tight as a jar lid that refuses to budge. Furthermore, the level of statistical significance, denoted by a p-value less than 0.01, provides clear evidence that this correlation is not merely a whimsical anomaly.
It is important to underscore that our research seeks to elucidate rather than magnify the significance of these findings. We maintain a steadfast commitment to the pursuit of empirical truth and scientific inquiry, understanding that sometimes reality unfolds in ways that tickle our curiosity and defy conventional expectations.
As we embark on this expedition of unraveling the enigmatic entwinement of political allegiances and automotive perils, we invite fellow scholars to join us in this voyage. The unsettling yet captivating correlation we have uncovered is ripe for further exploration and analysis, beckoning us to question preconceived notions and embrace the delightful unpredictability of the academic pursuit.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will detail the methodological approaches employed, present the empirical findings in all their astounding glory, and offer contemplative discussions on the implications of this correlation. Our hope is that our endeavor will provoke laughter at the sheer absurdity of the connection, but also spark rigorous intellectual inquiry that transcends the conventional boundaries of disciplinary silos.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data pertaining to votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and automotive recalls for issues with air bags revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9816129, indicative of a robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.9635639 further underscores the tight-knit nature of this connection, akin to the inextricable bond of a stubborn bulldog refusing to release its favorite chew toy. This relationship is accompanied by a level of statistical significance denoted by p < 0.01, confirming that the observed correlation is not merely a fluke but a recurring pattern deserving of scholarly attention.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot, visually depicting the exceptional correlation between the votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and automotive recalls for air bag malfunctions. As the data points coalesce into a discernible pattern, it becomes evident that this correlation is not a mere figment of statistical whimsy but a tangible phenomenon warranting further investigation.
These results may prompt a raised eyebrow or two, as the convergence of vehicular safety concerns and individual voting behavior in a particular geographic locale may initially appear as unexpected as a surprise birthday cake at a funeral. However, our findings compel us to consider the potential implications of these unexpected associations while maintaining a steadfast commitment to rigorous scientific inquiry.
In light of these compelling results, the subsequent sections of this paper will delve into the implications of this correlation, offering contemplative discussions that transcend the conventional boundaries of disciplinary silos. We acknowledge that the juxtaposition of political allegiance and automotive safety concerns may ruffle a few feathers, but we remain steadfast in our dedication to unraveling the enigmatic and unpredictable nature of societal interconnections.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Tote the Libertarian Votes in Idaho and Automotive Air Bag Recalls: A Curious Correlation
[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and automotive recalls for issues with air bags has been a topic of peculiar interest. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, this study aims to shed light on this compelling correlation. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9816129 and a level of statistical significance denoted by p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1990 to 2020. The findings of this investigation may raise eyebrows and prompt further inquiry into the peculiar patterns observed, challenging traditional assumptions about the interconnectedness of automotive safety and political preferences. Our research seeks not to inflate the significance of these findings but simply to air out the unexpected relationship between seemingly unrelated phenomena.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The authors find that the relationship between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and automotive recalls for issues with air bags has sparked considerable curiosity and bemusement among researchers and scholars. Numerous studies have sought to probe the potential links between political leanings and automotive safety concerns, despite the seemingly improbable nature of such a correlation.
Smith (2015) examines the broader intersection of political affiliations with consumer behaviors and preferences, delving into the influence of ideological inclinations on purchasing decisions. While Smith's work does not directly address the specific nexus of political votes and automotive recalls, it does lay a foundation for exploring the ways in which political allegiances may permeate various facets of consumer choices and experiences.
Doe (2018) takes a different approach, presenting a comprehensive analysis of automotive recalls and their impact on consumer trust in the automobile industry. The study offers valuable insights into the ramifications of safety issues on consumer perceptions, shedding light on the potential ripple effects that may stem from publicized automotive defects. While Doe's work does not touch upon the political dimensions of recalls, it underscores the broader significance of safety-related concerns in shaping consumer attitudes and market dynamics.
Moving beyond the confines of scholarly articles, prominent non-fiction works such as "The Politics of Automobiles" (Jones, 2017) and "Libertarianism Unleashed" (Johnson, 2019) indirectly traverse the realm of our inquiry. Though their primary focus lies elsewhere, these publications offer nuanced perspectives on the societal, political, and economic landscapes that intersect with our research interests. The multifaceted nature of these works serves as a reminder that seemingly divergent topics may interweave in unexpected and thought-provoking ways.
In the realm of fiction, titles such as "The Airbag Chronicles" (Smith, 2006) and "The Libertarian Driver's Dilemma" (Doe, 2014) exude an air of whimsy and imagination, transporting readers into realms where air bags and political ideologies collide in fantastical narratives. While these fictional accounts may not offer empirical or scholarly insights, they contribute to the broader cultural exploration of themes that echo, however distantly, the peculiar relationship we seek to unravel.
As the literature survey expands its horizons, it ventures into unorthodox territories, drawing inspiration from an assortment of sources that extend beyond traditional academic realms. It is here that the authors unabashedly admit to perusing an array of eclectic materials, including but not limited to the backs of shampoo bottles, fortune cookie messages, and the whimsical musings of zealous conspiracy theorists. While these sources may raise eyebrows and elicit a chuckle or two, they serve as a poignant reminder of the unanticipated avenues from which inspiration and insight can manifest.
In the pursuit of academic inquiry, it is crucial to embrace the unforeseen, the offbeat, and the seemingly preposterous, recognizing that knowledge and wisdom are often concealed in the most improbable of places. With our literature review meandering through both the conventional and the unconventional, we earnestly invite fellow scholars to join us in this merry expedition of discovery, where the unexpected connections are as abundant as grains of sand on a whimsical beach.
Though this literature review may raise a wry smile or two, its underlying message remains steadfast - the pursuit of knowledge and truth transcends the boundaries of convention, leading us to marvel at the delightful absurdity of academia while steadfastly seeking the lamp of reason amidst the shadows of whimsy.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data pertaining to votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and automotive recalls for issues with air bags revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9816129, indicative of a robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.9635639 further underscores the tight-knit nature of this connection, akin to the inextricable bond of a stubborn bulldog refusing to release its favorite chew toy. This relationship is accompanied by a level of statistical significance denoted by p < 0.01, confirming that the observed correlation is not merely a fluke but a recurring pattern deserving of scholarly attention.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot, visually depicting the exceptional correlation between the votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and automotive recalls for air bag malfunctions. As the data points coalesce into a discernible pattern, it becomes evident that this correlation is not a mere figment of statistical whimsy but a tangible phenomenon warranting further investigation.
These results may prompt a raised eyebrow or two, as the convergence of vehicular safety concerns and individual voting behavior in a particular geographic locale may initially appear as unexpected as a surprise birthday cake at a funeral. However, our findings compel us to consider the potential implications of these unexpected associations while maintaining a steadfast commitment to rigorous scientific inquiry.
In light of these compelling results, the subsequent sections of this paper will delve into the implications of this correlation, offering contemplative discussions that transcend the conventional boundaries of disciplinary silos. We acknowledge that the juxtaposition of political allegiance and automotive safety concerns may ruffle a few feathers, but we remain steadfast in our dedication to unraveling the enigmatic and unpredictable nature of societal interconnections.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The findings of our study yield a thought-provoking revelation that alludes to an unexpected intertwining of disparate domains – the congenial Idahoan preference for Libertarian ideals and the perilous predicament of air bag recalls. Our research delivers compelling evidence that arguably rivals the ironclad bond between summer vacation and sunburns – a correlation coefficient of 0.9816129, not to be dismissed as a mere fluke or happenstance.
Indeed, the scholarly scrutiny of this curious correlation has undeniably solidified its significance, akin to a treasure chest securely guarded by an intellectual pirate highly skeptical of hypotheses and suspicious of statistical outliers. Our results align harmoniously with prior research that has playfully danced on the peripheries of whimsy, such as "The Airbag Chronicles" (Smith, 2006) and "The Libertarian Driver's Dilemma" (Doe, 2014), demonstrating that the unyielding grip of statistical analysis may reveal connections no less enthralling – or perplexing – than those conjured in fictional realms.
The high correlation uncovered nestles comfortably within the pangs of statistical significance, whispering sweet somethings of academic curiosity and tantalizing the taste buds of scholarly intrigue. This discovery invites us to contemplate the enduring mysteries that pervade the fabric of human behavior and societal dynamics, much like the thriving ecosystem of conspiracy theories that thrive in the fertile soil of the internet – amusing, baffling, and, on occasion, oddly compelling.
In the spirit of intellectual exploration, our study nudges the hitherto entrenched boundaries of conventional research methodologies, beckoning us to embrace the unforeseen with the warmth of a quirky, albeit endearing, familiar. As we embark on this enthralling journey of scholarly discovery, we invite our peers to join us in weaving diverse threads of knowledge, recognizing that the quilt of academia, much like a Nevada desert at high noon, can yield both the unanticipated and the inexplicable. Our findings serve as a beckoning beacon, guiding future investigations towards elucidating the profound implications of this interconnectedness that have surfaced, albeit unwittingly, from the labyrinth of empirical data.
In the grand tapestry of academia, where threads of erudition intersect with the warp and weft of human experience, our study transcends the mundane and ventures into the fantastical; traversing the paths of empirical rigor while embracing the whimsy that ebbs at the peripheries of our shared pursuit. Thus, we are presented with a juncture where statistical acumen dances with political proclivities, and the beckoning embrace of scholarly fervor welcomes the improbable with a knowing wink, reminding us that academia, much like life itself, thrives in the unexpected and diverse.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Tote the Libertarian Votes in Idaho and Automotive Air Bag Recalls: A Curious Correlation
[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and automotive recalls for issues with air bags has been a topic of peculiar interest. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, this study aims to shed light on this compelling correlation. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9816129 and a level of statistical significance denoted by p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1990 to 2020. The findings of this investigation may raise eyebrows and prompt further inquiry into the peculiar patterns observed, challenging traditional assumptions about the interconnectedness of automotive safety and political preferences. Our research seeks not to inflate the significance of these findings but simply to air out the unexpected relationship between seemingly unrelated phenomena.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intricate and often unpredictable web of societal dynamics has long captivated the minds of researchers across various disciplines. Our quest for understanding often leads us to investigate seemingly disparate phenomena, hoping to uncover the hidden threads that tie them together. In this spirit of inquiry, we delve into the peculiar connection between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and the occurrence of automotive recalls pertaining to air bag malfunctions. While this correlation may initially appear as incongruous as pairing fuchsia with chartreuse, our empirical analysis yields a remarkable association that demands attention.
The notion of political preferences intersecting with automotive safety concerns may at first glance appear as implausible as a unicorn sighting in a crowded metropolis. However, as practitioners of data-driven inquiry, we must be diligent in exploring even the most whimsical correlations to discern whether there is genuine substance behind the initial bewilderment.
Our investigation draws upon data culled from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, meticulously examining the span of time from 1990 to 2020. Through the application of rigorous statistical methodologies, we have unearthed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9816129, signifying a degree of association that is, to invoke a colloquial expression, as tight as a jar lid that refuses to budge. Furthermore, the level of statistical significance, denoted by a p-value less than 0.01, provides clear evidence that this correlation is not merely a whimsical anomaly.
It is important to underscore that our research seeks to elucidate rather than magnify the significance of these findings. We maintain a steadfast commitment to the pursuit of empirical truth and scientific inquiry, understanding that sometimes reality unfolds in ways that tickle our curiosity and defy conventional expectations.
As we embark on this expedition of unraveling the enigmatic entwinement of political allegiances and automotive perils, we invite fellow scholars to join us in this voyage. The unsettling yet captivating correlation we have uncovered is ripe for further exploration and analysis, beckoning us to question preconceived notions and embrace the delightful unpredictability of the academic pursuit.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will detail the methodological approaches employed, present the empirical findings in all their astounding glory, and offer contemplative discussions on the implications of this correlation. Our hope is that our endeavor will provoke laughter at the sheer absurdity of the connection, but also spark rigorous intellectual inquiry that transcends the conventional boundaries of disciplinary silos.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data pertaining to votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and automotive recalls for issues with air bags revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9816129, indicative of a robust association between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.9635639 further underscores the tight-knit nature of this connection, akin to the inextricable bond of a stubborn bulldog refusing to release its favorite chew toy. This relationship is accompanied by a level of statistical significance denoted by p < 0.01, confirming that the observed correlation is not merely a fluke but a recurring pattern deserving of scholarly attention.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot, visually depicting the exceptional correlation between the votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and automotive recalls for air bag malfunctions. As the data points coalesce into a discernible pattern, it becomes evident that this correlation is not a mere figment of statistical whimsy but a tangible phenomenon warranting further investigation.
These results may prompt a raised eyebrow or two, as the convergence of vehicular safety concerns and individual voting behavior in a particular geographic locale may initially appear as unexpected as a surprise birthday cake at a funeral. However, our findings compel us to consider the potential implications of these unexpected associations while maintaining a steadfast commitment to rigorous scientific inquiry.
In light of these compelling results, the subsequent sections of this paper will delve into the implications of this correlation, offering contemplative discussions that transcend the conventional boundaries of disciplinary silos. We acknowledge that the juxtaposition of political allegiance and automotive safety concerns may ruffle a few feathers, but we remain steadfast in our dedication to unraveling the enigmatic and unpredictable nature of societal interconnections.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our research has unearthed a remarkable correlation between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and automotive recalls for air bag malfunctions. The robust association, with a correlation coefficient as tight as a jar lid that refuses to budge, has left us both perplexed and amused. The r-squared value further solidifies this unexpected connection, much like the unyielding grip of a startled octopus. While the juxtaposition of political inclinations and automotive safety concerns may seem as incongruous as a clown at a funeral, our findings compel us to take this correlation seriously and contemplate its implications.
The scatterplot vividly illustrates the tangible nature of this correlation, compelling us to delve deeper into the mysterious entanglement between apparently unrelated phenomena. We cannot help but acknowledge the sheer absurdity of this connection, akin to a whimsical flourish in an otherwise somber composition.
This revelation offers a whimsical interlude in the otherwise austere landscape of empirical inquiry, inviting us to recognize the delightful unpredictability that permeates the academic pursuit. Yet, despite the amusement it brings, we must not overlook the potential societal implications of this correlation. We are left with no doubt that further investigation, much like a persistent itch that demands scratching, is necessary to truly comprehend the underlying mechanisms at play.
In light of these findings, it is our earnest recommendation that no further research is needed in this area. After all, we have undoubtedly uncovered a correlation as confounding and unexpected as a flying pig and as captivating as a breathtaking magic trick. It is time for the academic community to both revel in the sheer absurdity of this connection and to recognize that, sometimes, reality presents us with puzzles that defy conventional understanding.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Tote the Libertarian Votes in Idaho and Automotive Air Bag Recalls: A Curious Correlation. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Quirky Correlations
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Tote the Libertarian Votes in Idaho and Automotive Air Bag Recalls: A Curious Correlation. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
Society for the Study of Quirky Correlations
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Tote the Libertarian Votes in Idaho and Automotive Air Bag Recalls: A Curious Correlation with an abstract of The relationship between votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho and automotive recalls for issues with air bags has been a topic of peculiar interest. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the US Department of Transportation, this study aims to shed light on this compelling correlation. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9816129 and a level of statistical significance denoted by p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1990 to 2020. The findings of this investigation may raise eyebrows and prompt further inquiry into the peculiar patterns observed, challenging traditional assumptions about the interconnectedness of automotive safety and political preferences. Our research seeks not to inflate the significance of these findings but simply to air out the unexpected relationship between seemingly unrelated phenomena.
ChatGPT:
Libertarian Presidential candidate, Idaho, automotive air bag recalls, correlation, statistical analysis, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, US Department of Transportation, political preferences, automotive safety, statistical significance, interconnectedness, peculiar patterns.
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in IdahoDetailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho
Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9635639 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 96.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho) over the 8 years from 1990 through 2020.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.5E-5. 0.0000153274666244075400000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 0.0015% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 65,242 random variables You don't actually need 65 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.9, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1992 | 1996 | 2000 | 2004 | 2008 | 2012 | 2016 | 2020 | |
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho (Percentage of votes) | 0.242059 | 0.67621 | 0.695354 | 0.642405 | 0.558369 | 1.44924 | 4.10442 | 1.88983 |
Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags (Recalls) | 4 | 8 | 15 | 14 | 13 | 23 | 106 | 58 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.242059,0.67621,0.695354,0.642405,0.558369,1.44924,4.10442,1.88983,])
array_2 = np.array([4,8,15,14,13,23,106,58,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Idaho
- Line chart for only Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Tote the Libertarian Votes in Idaho and Automotive Air Bag Recalls: A Curious Correlation
I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!
Correlation ID: 5042 · Black Variable ID: 26086 · Red Variable ID: 1105