Download png, svg
AI explanation
As more people delved into the complexities of number theory and mathematical concepts, they began to question the very foundations of reality, leading to an existential crisis. This newfound uncertainty seeped into internet culture, giving rise to the 'not sure if' meme as people grappled with the blurred lines between absolute truth and subjective perception. It's as if the viewers couldn't count on anything anymore, creating a multiplying effect on the meme's popularity.Create a meme inspired by the not sure if meme that in some way references Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos. Try to emulate the style of the meme - don’t violate the copyright, just make it look and feel like the original meme.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos positively influenced Popularity of the 'not sure if' meme.
AI academic paper
Crunching Numbers and Memes: An Examination of the Relationship Between Total Views on Numberphile YouTube Videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' Meme The Journal of Internet Culture and Quantitative Analysis Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and Popularity of the 'not sure if' meme. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title seem clever.
Your research team used data from YouTube and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9727197 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2023.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Crunching Numbers and Memes: An Examination of the Relationship Between Total Views on Numberphile YouTube Videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' Meme"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a journey through the numerical labyrinth that lies between the enigmatic world of Numberphile and the viral allure of the 'Not Sure If' meme. Our research delves into the Archives of YouTube in an attempt to untangle the web of correlations, associations, and mathematical flirtations that underlie the intersection of math enthusiasts and meme connaisseurs. Through the astute use of data analytics and trend spotting, we present evidence of a robust connection - a correlation coefficient of 0.9727197, with p < 0.01 – between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme from 2011 to 2023. Our findings uncover a fascinating numerical dance between the esoteric realms of mathematics and the whimsical world of internet humor, shedding light on the intricate web of cultural phenomena that enliven our digital age. So, join us in this intellectual romp, as we ponder the question "Is it a coincidence or a cosmic numerical conspiracy that binds Numberphile views and 'Not Sure If' memes in a quirky waltz of internet culture?"
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and Popularity of the 'not sure if' meme. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Crunching Numbers and Memes: An Examination of the Relationship Between Total Views on Numberphile YouTube Videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' Meme"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a journey through the numerical labyrinth that lies between the enigmatic world of Numberphile and the viral allure of the 'Not Sure If' meme. Our research delves into the Archives of YouTube in an attempt to untangle the web of correlations, associations, and mathematical flirtations that underlie the intersection of math enthusiasts and meme connaisseurs. Through the astute use of data analytics and trend spotting, we present evidence of a robust connection - a correlation coefficient of 0.9727197, with p < 0.01 – between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme from 2011 to 2023. Our findings uncover a fascinating numerical dance between the esoteric realms of mathematics and the whimsical world of internet humor, shedding light on the intricate web of cultural phenomena that enliven our digital age. So, join us in this intellectual romp, as we ponder the question "Is it a coincidence or a cosmic numerical conspiracy that binds Numberphile views and 'Not Sure If' memes in a quirky waltz of internet culture?"
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION
The intersection of mathematics and internet memes may seem like an unlikely duo, akin to a symphony performance at a rock concert. Yet, in the grand tapestry of the digital age, such peculiar bedfellows often find themselves entangled in a dance of numbers and humor, creating a fascinating spectacle for those who dare to look beyond the surface. In this paper, we peel back the layers of internet culture to uncover a curious relationship between the Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme. As we delve into this peculiar realm, we invite you to don your metaphorical mathematician's hat and brace yourselves for an intellectual adventure that traverses through labyrinthine algorithms and whimsical internet humor.
As we embark on this scholarly caper, it's important to acknowledge the undeniable allure of both Numberphile and the 'Not Sure If' meme. The former, an oasis for math enthusiasts and inquisitive souls, offers a treasure trove of meticulously crafted videos that whisk viewers away into the captivating world of numbers, patterns, and the mathematical underpinnings of the universe. With hosts who possess the charisma and charm of mathemagicians, it is no wonder that Numberphile has amassed a loyal following of truth-seekers and puzzle enthusiasts, who eagerly devour each tantalizing video.
On the other end of the spectrum, we encounter the enigmatic phenomenon of the 'Not Sure If' meme, a mirage in the vast desert of internet humor. Originating from the character of Futurama's "Fry," it has become a primordial soup from which countless iterations of humorous uncertainty have emerged. The meme's ability to capture the essence of contemplation in the face of absurdity, uncertainty, and life's perplexities has cemented its status as a staple in the digital lexicon.
Now, one might find themselves asking, "What in the name of Pythagoras do these seemingly disparate entities have in common?" Ah, my dear reader, that is the tantalizing question that fuels the engine of this research endeavor. For in the world of academia, as in the world of internet memes, one mustn't shy away from the unexpected or the absurd, but rather embrace them with enthusiasm and rigorous analysis.
But, before we proceed any further, let us take a moment to pause and ponder. Given the inherent peculiarity of our subject matter, one would be remiss not to approach our findings with a healthy dose of skepticism and light-hearted curiosity. After all, it is in the nature of scientific inquiry to embrace the tantalizing enigma of the unknown and to revel in the dance of discovery.
So, my esteemed colleagues and jesters of the academic court, let us venture forth into the labyrinth of data, armed with our wits and a penchant for the unexpected. For what lies ahead is not merely a dry examination of statistical correlations, but a whimsical romp through the numerical wonderland that binds the worlds of rigorous mathematics and playful internet humor in a delightfully unexpected embrace.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and Popularity of the 'not sure if' meme. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Crunching Numbers and Memes: An Examination of the Relationship Between Total Views on Numberphile YouTube Videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' Meme"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a journey through the numerical labyrinth that lies between the enigmatic world of Numberphile and the viral allure of the 'Not Sure If' meme. Our research delves into the Archives of YouTube in an attempt to untangle the web of correlations, associations, and mathematical flirtations that underlie the intersection of math enthusiasts and meme connaisseurs. Through the astute use of data analytics and trend spotting, we present evidence of a robust connection - a correlation coefficient of 0.9727197, with p < 0.01 – between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme from 2011 to 2023. Our findings uncover a fascinating numerical dance between the esoteric realms of mathematics and the whimsical world of internet humor, shedding light on the intricate web of cultural phenomena that enliven our digital age. So, join us in this intellectual romp, as we ponder the question "Is it a coincidence or a cosmic numerical conspiracy that binds Numberphile views and 'Not Sure If' memes in a quirky waltz of internet culture?"
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The intersection of mathematics and internet memes may seem like an unlikely duo, akin to a symphony performance at a rock concert. Yet, in the grand tapestry of the digital age, such peculiar bedfellows often find themselves entangled in a dance of numbers and humor, creating a fascinating spectacle for those who dare to look beyond the surface. In this paper, we peel back the layers of internet culture to uncover a curious relationship between the Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme. As we delve into this peculiar realm, we invite you to don your metaphorical mathematician's hat and brace yourselves for an intellectual adventure that traverses through labyrinthine algorithms and whimsical internet humor.
As we embark on this scholarly caper, it's important to acknowledge the undeniable allure of both Numberphile and the 'Not Sure If' meme. The former, an oasis for math enthusiasts and inquisitive souls, offers a treasure trove of meticulously crafted videos that whisk viewers away into the captivating world of numbers, patterns, and the mathematical underpinnings of the universe. With hosts who possess the charisma and charm of mathemagicians, it is no wonder that Numberphile has amassed a loyal following of truth-seekers and puzzle enthusiasts, who eagerly devour each tantalizing video.
On the other end of the spectrum, we encounter the enigmatic phenomenon of the 'Not Sure If' meme, a mirage in the vast desert of internet humor. Originating from the character of Futurama's "Fry," it has become a primordial soup from which countless iterations of humorous uncertainty have emerged. The meme's ability to capture the essence of contemplation in the face of absurdity, uncertainty, and life's perplexities has cemented its status as a staple in the digital lexicon.
Now, one might find themselves asking, "What in the name of Pythagoras do these seemingly disparate entities have in common?" Ah, my dear reader, that is the tantalizing question that fuels the engine of this research endeavor. For in the world of academia, as in the world of internet memes, one mustn't shy away from the unexpected or the absurd, but rather embrace them with enthusiasm and rigorous analysis.
But, before we proceed any further, let us take a moment to pause and ponder. Given the inherent peculiarity of our subject matter, one would be remiss not to approach our findings with a healthy dose of skepticism and light-hearted curiosity. After all, it is in the nature of scientific inquiry to embrace the tantalizing enigma of the unknown and to revel in the dance of discovery.
So, my esteemed colleagues and jesters of the academic court, let us venture forth into the labyrinth of data, armed with our wits and a penchant for the unexpected. For what lies ahead is not merely a dry examination of statistical correlations, but a whimsical romp through the numerical wonderland that binds the worlds of rigorous mathematics and playful internet humor in a delightfully unexpected embrace.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the pursuit of unraveling the intricate dance between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme, researchers have traversed through the hallowed halls of academia, waded through the swamp of internet culture, and surfed the tidal waves of numerical quirkiness. In "Smith's Comprehensive Analysis of Internet Phenomena," the authors diligently dissect the rise of internet memes and their surreal coexistence with mathematical havens, shedding light on the symbiotic relationship that transcends the boundaries of conventional wisdom.
Moving on from the serious, let us take a detour into the world of non-fiction books that delve into the peculiar intersection of mathematics and internet humor. "Calculating Comedy: A Mathematical Analysis of Internet Memes" by Doe and Jones offers an in-depth exploration of how mathematical concepts and humor intertwine in the digital sphere, leaving readers both enlightened and amused. On the flip side, "The Meme Matrix: Unraveling the Algebra of Internet Humor" by X. Fibonacci delves into the numerical underpinnings of viral content, showcasing how memes and mathematical musings harmonize in the infinite canvas of cyberspace.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, we encounter titles that, surprisingly, share a kinship with our peculiar research endeavor. "The Calculus Conundrum of Cyber Comedy" by A. Square masterfully weaves a tale of mathematical intrigue and internet hijinks, blurring the line between numerical precision and whimsical absurdity. On the other hand, "The Meme Mirage" by C. Graph takes readers on a surreal journey through the labyrinthine corridors of internet humor, uncovering the enigmatic connections that bind mathematical curiosity with meme culture.
As we traverse the cultural landscape, let us not neglect the influence of childhood favorites that have left a lasting impression on our understanding of numbers and amusement. From the mathematical antics of "Donald in Mathmagic Land" to the whimsical charm of "Numberjacks," these timeless classics have imprinted upon our collective consciousness a fondness for numerical adventures and the enduring allure of playful, mind-bending humor.
Now, as we emerge from this whirlwind tour through academia, literature, and childhood nostalgia, it becomes clear that our quest for understanding the union of Numberphile views and 'Not Sure If' memes is not merely an academic pursuit but a whimsical romp through the interconnected fabric of human fascination with numbers and humor. In the following sections, we will dive into the methodological intricacies of our data analysis—a journey that promises both intellectual rigor and the occasional chuckle. So fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, for we are about to embark on a rollercoaster ride through the numerical wonders of internet culture!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and Popularity of the 'not sure if' meme. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Google Trends . You used data from 2011 to 2023
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Crunching Numbers and Memes: An Examination of the Relationship Between Total Views on Numberphile YouTube Videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' Meme"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a journey through the numerical labyrinth that lies between the enigmatic world of Numberphile and the viral allure of the 'Not Sure If' meme. Our research delves into the Archives of YouTube in an attempt to untangle the web of correlations, associations, and mathematical flirtations that underlie the intersection of math enthusiasts and meme connaisseurs. Through the astute use of data analytics and trend spotting, we present evidence of a robust connection - a correlation coefficient of 0.9727197, with p < 0.01 – between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme from 2011 to 2023. Our findings uncover a fascinating numerical dance between the esoteric realms of mathematics and the whimsical world of internet humor, shedding light on the intricate web of cultural phenomena that enliven our digital age. So, join us in this intellectual romp, as we ponder the question "Is it a coincidence or a cosmic numerical conspiracy that binds Numberphile views and 'Not Sure If' memes in a quirky waltz of internet culture?"
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The intersection of mathematics and internet memes may seem like an unlikely duo, akin to a symphony performance at a rock concert. Yet, in the grand tapestry of the digital age, such peculiar bedfellows often find themselves entangled in a dance of numbers and humor, creating a fascinating spectacle for those who dare to look beyond the surface. In this paper, we peel back the layers of internet culture to uncover a curious relationship between the Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme. As we delve into this peculiar realm, we invite you to don your metaphorical mathematician's hat and brace yourselves for an intellectual adventure that traverses through labyrinthine algorithms and whimsical internet humor.
As we embark on this scholarly caper, it's important to acknowledge the undeniable allure of both Numberphile and the 'Not Sure If' meme. The former, an oasis for math enthusiasts and inquisitive souls, offers a treasure trove of meticulously crafted videos that whisk viewers away into the captivating world of numbers, patterns, and the mathematical underpinnings of the universe. With hosts who possess the charisma and charm of mathemagicians, it is no wonder that Numberphile has amassed a loyal following of truth-seekers and puzzle enthusiasts, who eagerly devour each tantalizing video.
On the other end of the spectrum, we encounter the enigmatic phenomenon of the 'Not Sure If' meme, a mirage in the vast desert of internet humor. Originating from the character of Futurama's "Fry," it has become a primordial soup from which countless iterations of humorous uncertainty have emerged. The meme's ability to capture the essence of contemplation in the face of absurdity, uncertainty, and life's perplexities has cemented its status as a staple in the digital lexicon.
Now, one might find themselves asking, "What in the name of Pythagoras do these seemingly disparate entities have in common?" Ah, my dear reader, that is the tantalizing question that fuels the engine of this research endeavor. For in the world of academia, as in the world of internet memes, one mustn't shy away from the unexpected or the absurd, but rather embrace them with enthusiasm and rigorous analysis.
But, before we proceed any further, let us take a moment to pause and ponder. Given the inherent peculiarity of our subject matter, one would be remiss not to approach our findings with a healthy dose of skepticism and light-hearted curiosity. After all, it is in the nature of scientific inquiry to embrace the tantalizing enigma of the unknown and to revel in the dance of discovery.
So, my esteemed colleagues and jesters of the academic court, let us venture forth into the labyrinth of data, armed with our wits and a penchant for the unexpected. For what lies ahead is not merely a dry examination of statistical correlations, but a whimsical romp through the numerical wonderland that binds the worlds of rigorous mathematics and playful internet humor in a delightfully unexpected embrace.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
METHODOLOGY
To unravel the mysterious connection between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme, we employed a hodgepodge of data collection methods akin to a treasure hunt conducted in the virtual realms of the internet. Our team of intrepid researchers scoured the digital landscape, navigating through the ever-shifting currents of online platforms and trend trackers to gather a wealth of information from the year 2011 to 2023.
YouTube, the veritable treasure trove of visual content and cultural artifacts, served as our primary hunting ground for data on Total views of Numberphile videos. Through the cunning use of digital tools and statistical wizardry, we sought out a cornucopia of numerical data, weaving through the vast labyrinth of mathematical mysteries and witticisms that define the Numberphile channel's repertoire.
In parallel to our escapades on YouTube, we sought enlightenment from the enigmatic oracle known as Google Trends. Here, amidst the ever-shifting tides of internet search queries and trends, we sought to capture the elusive zeitgeist of the 'Not Sure If' meme's rise and fall in popularity. With the finesse of a meme archaeologist and the patience of a vigilant observer, we meticulously recorded the undulations of this peculiar meme's online presence.
To reconcile the diverse and mercurial nature of our data sources, we employed a majestic symphony of statistical techniques and data analysis tools that would make even the most quantitatively-inclined virtuosos nod in affirmative awe. From simple correlation analyses to the arcane rituals of time series modeling, our aim was to uncover the subtle harmonic resonance that binds the worlds of mathematical enlightenment and humorous uncertainty.
Our chosen period of investigation spanned from 2011 to 2023, a timeframe marked by the flourishing of internet culture and the relentless march of mathematical inquiry. Through this temporal lens, we endeavored to capture the ebb and flow of public interest in both Numberphile and the 'Not Sure If' meme, like intrepid seafarers navigating the turbulent seas of internet fascination.
Despite the labyrinthine convolutions of our data collection methods, we endeavored to uphold the rigorous standards of scientific inquiry, guided by the playful spirit of discovery and the relentless pursuit of knowledge. Armed with an arsenal of wit and wisdom, we sailed through the virtual expanse, seeking to unlock the secrets that lie at the crossroads of mathematical majesty and meme magic.
Thus, as we continue this whimsical journey through academia's digital wonderland, we stand ready to present our findings with a dapper flair befitting the peculiar nature of our delightful subject matter. For what lies ahead is not merely a dry recitation of procedural details, but a comedic dance through the data-driven odyssey that binds the world of Numberphile viewership and the splendid uncertainties of the 'Not Sure If' meme.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and Popularity of the 'not sure if' meme. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Google Trends .
For the time period 2011 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9727197, r-squared of 0.9461836, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Crunching Numbers and Memes: An Examination of the Relationship Between Total Views on Numberphile YouTube Videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' Meme"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a journey through the numerical labyrinth that lies between the enigmatic world of Numberphile and the viral allure of the 'Not Sure If' meme. Our research delves into the Archives of YouTube in an attempt to untangle the web of correlations, associations, and mathematical flirtations that underlie the intersection of math enthusiasts and meme connaisseurs. Through the astute use of data analytics and trend spotting, we present evidence of a robust connection - a correlation coefficient of 0.9727197, with p < 0.01 – between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme from 2011 to 2023. Our findings uncover a fascinating numerical dance between the esoteric realms of mathematics and the whimsical world of internet humor, shedding light on the intricate web of cultural phenomena that enliven our digital age. So, join us in this intellectual romp, as we ponder the question "Is it a coincidence or a cosmic numerical conspiracy that binds Numberphile views and 'Not Sure If' memes in a quirky waltz of internet culture?"
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The intersection of mathematics and internet memes may seem like an unlikely duo, akin to a symphony performance at a rock concert. Yet, in the grand tapestry of the digital age, such peculiar bedfellows often find themselves entangled in a dance of numbers and humor, creating a fascinating spectacle for those who dare to look beyond the surface. In this paper, we peel back the layers of internet culture to uncover a curious relationship between the Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme. As we delve into this peculiar realm, we invite you to don your metaphorical mathematician's hat and brace yourselves for an intellectual adventure that traverses through labyrinthine algorithms and whimsical internet humor.
As we embark on this scholarly caper, it's important to acknowledge the undeniable allure of both Numberphile and the 'Not Sure If' meme. The former, an oasis for math enthusiasts and inquisitive souls, offers a treasure trove of meticulously crafted videos that whisk viewers away into the captivating world of numbers, patterns, and the mathematical underpinnings of the universe. With hosts who possess the charisma and charm of mathemagicians, it is no wonder that Numberphile has amassed a loyal following of truth-seekers and puzzle enthusiasts, who eagerly devour each tantalizing video.
On the other end of the spectrum, we encounter the enigmatic phenomenon of the 'Not Sure If' meme, a mirage in the vast desert of internet humor. Originating from the character of Futurama's "Fry," it has become a primordial soup from which countless iterations of humorous uncertainty have emerged. The meme's ability to capture the essence of contemplation in the face of absurdity, uncertainty, and life's perplexities has cemented its status as a staple in the digital lexicon.
Now, one might find themselves asking, "What in the name of Pythagoras do these seemingly disparate entities have in common?" Ah, my dear reader, that is the tantalizing question that fuels the engine of this research endeavor. For in the world of academia, as in the world of internet memes, one mustn't shy away from the unexpected or the absurd, but rather embrace them with enthusiasm and rigorous analysis.
But, before we proceed any further, let us take a moment to pause and ponder. Given the inherent peculiarity of our subject matter, one would be remiss not to approach our findings with a healthy dose of skepticism and light-hearted curiosity. After all, it is in the nature of scientific inquiry to embrace the tantalizing enigma of the unknown and to revel in the dance of discovery.
So, my esteemed colleagues and jesters of the academic court, let us venture forth into the labyrinth of data, armed with our wits and a penchant for the unexpected. For what lies ahead is not merely a dry examination of statistical correlations, but a whimsical romp through the numerical wonderland that binds the worlds of rigorous mathematics and playful internet humor in a delightfully unexpected embrace.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Our intrepid foray into the entwined realms of Numberphile viewership and 'Not Sure If' memes has yielded an intriguing revelation. After meticulously sifting through heaps of data and engaging in a metaphysical tango with statistical analyses, we unearthed a robust and positively titillating correlation coefficient of 0.9727197 between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme from 2011 to 2023. This correlation, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.9461836, establishes a strong and dependable relationship between the two phenomena, akin to a steadfast equation that withstands the test of empirical scrutiny.
It appears that as the Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos wax and wane, so does the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme, in a synchronous dance that traverses the virtual landscape of internet culture. The robustness of this relationship becomes all the more compelling when considering the statistical significance, with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a minuscule likelihood that this connection is mere happenstance.
To visually encapsulate this enthralling union of mathematical musings and comedic contemplation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly depicts the strong correlation between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme. This visual representation sashays with empirical elegance, poignantly affirming the convergence of mathematical inquiry and internet humor in a captivating embrace.
Enthused by these findings, we submit that the inexplicably intertwined nature of these two seemingly incongruous phenomena calls for further exploration, prompting questions that tickle the curiosity and stir the intellectual mirth of scholars and jesters alike. As we march forward, armed with the vigor of statistical substantiation and the whimsy of digital phenomena, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in a mirthful romp through the interweaving realms of mathematical inquiry and internet hilarity, as we unravel the enigmatic threads that bind Numberphile views and 'Not Sure If' memes in a gregarious waltz of internet culture.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and Popularity of the 'not sure if' meme. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"Crunching Numbers and Memes: An Examination of the Relationship Between Total Views on Numberphile YouTube Videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' Meme"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a journey through the numerical labyrinth that lies between the enigmatic world of Numberphile and the viral allure of the 'Not Sure If' meme. Our research delves into the Archives of YouTube in an attempt to untangle the web of correlations, associations, and mathematical flirtations that underlie the intersection of math enthusiasts and meme connaisseurs. Through the astute use of data analytics and trend spotting, we present evidence of a robust connection - a correlation coefficient of 0.9727197, with p < 0.01 – between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme from 2011 to 2023. Our findings uncover a fascinating numerical dance between the esoteric realms of mathematics and the whimsical world of internet humor, shedding light on the intricate web of cultural phenomena that enliven our digital age. So, join us in this intellectual romp, as we ponder the question "Is it a coincidence or a cosmic numerical conspiracy that binds Numberphile views and 'Not Sure If' memes in a quirky waltz of internet culture?"
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the pursuit of unraveling the intricate dance between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme, researchers have traversed through the hallowed halls of academia, waded through the swamp of internet culture, and surfed the tidal waves of numerical quirkiness. In "Smith's Comprehensive Analysis of Internet Phenomena," the authors diligently dissect the rise of internet memes and their surreal coexistence with mathematical havens, shedding light on the symbiotic relationship that transcends the boundaries of conventional wisdom.
Moving on from the serious, let us take a detour into the world of non-fiction books that delve into the peculiar intersection of mathematics and internet humor. "Calculating Comedy: A Mathematical Analysis of Internet Memes" by Doe and Jones offers an in-depth exploration of how mathematical concepts and humor intertwine in the digital sphere, leaving readers both enlightened and amused. On the flip side, "The Meme Matrix: Unraveling the Algebra of Internet Humor" by X. Fibonacci delves into the numerical underpinnings of viral content, showcasing how memes and mathematical musings harmonize in the infinite canvas of cyberspace.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, we encounter titles that, surprisingly, share a kinship with our peculiar research endeavor. "The Calculus Conundrum of Cyber Comedy" by A. Square masterfully weaves a tale of mathematical intrigue and internet hijinks, blurring the line between numerical precision and whimsical absurdity. On the other hand, "The Meme Mirage" by C. Graph takes readers on a surreal journey through the labyrinthine corridors of internet humor, uncovering the enigmatic connections that bind mathematical curiosity with meme culture.
As we traverse the cultural landscape, let us not neglect the influence of childhood favorites that have left a lasting impression on our understanding of numbers and amusement. From the mathematical antics of "Donald in Mathmagic Land" to the whimsical charm of "Numberjacks," these timeless classics have imprinted upon our collective consciousness a fondness for numerical adventures and the enduring allure of playful, mind-bending humor.
Now, as we emerge from this whirlwind tour through academia, literature, and childhood nostalgia, it becomes clear that our quest for understanding the union of Numberphile views and 'Not Sure If' memes is not merely an academic pursuit but a whimsical romp through the interconnected fabric of human fascination with numbers and humor. In the following sections, we will dive into the methodological intricacies of our data analysis—a journey that promises both intellectual rigor and the occasional chuckle. So fasten your seatbelts, dear readers, for we are about to embark on a rollercoaster ride through the numerical wonders of internet culture!
[[RESULTS]]
Our intrepid foray into the entwined realms of Numberphile viewership and 'Not Sure If' memes has yielded an intriguing revelation. After meticulously sifting through heaps of data and engaging in a metaphysical tango with statistical analyses, we unearthed a robust and positively titillating correlation coefficient of 0.9727197 between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme from 2011 to 2023. This correlation, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.9461836, establishes a strong and dependable relationship between the two phenomena, akin to a steadfast equation that withstands the test of empirical scrutiny.
It appears that as the Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos wax and wane, so does the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme, in a synchronous dance that traverses the virtual landscape of internet culture. The robustness of this relationship becomes all the more compelling when considering the statistical significance, with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a minuscule likelihood that this connection is mere happenstance.
To visually encapsulate this enthralling union of mathematical musings and comedic contemplation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly depicts the strong correlation between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme. This visual representation sashays with empirical elegance, poignantly affirming the convergence of mathematical inquiry and internet humor in a captivating embrace.
Enthused by these findings, we submit that the inexplicably intertwined nature of these two seemingly incongruous phenomena calls for further exploration, prompting questions that tickle the curiosity and stir the intellectual mirth of scholars and jesters alike. As we march forward, armed with the vigor of statistical substantiation and the whimsy of digital phenomena, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in a mirthful romp through the interweaving realms of mathematical inquiry and internet hilarity, as we unravel the enigmatic threads that bind Numberphile views and 'Not Sure If' memes in a gregarious waltz of internet culture.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Our findings reverberate with the peculiar symphony of mathematical quirkiness and digital whimsy that have long tantalized scholars and jesters alike. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9727197, complemented by a pertinacious p-value of less than 0.01, substantiates the apparent dalliance between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme, akin to a mathematical waltz bewitching the cyberspace promenade.
Harkening back to the scholarly goofery of "Calculating Comedy: A Mathematical Analysis of Internet Memes" by Doe and Jones and their virtuosic illumination of the interconnectedness of mathematical concepts and humor, our results extend a resounding nod to their jovial prowess. The numerical embrace between Numberphile views and 'Not Sure If' memes transcends the realm of happenstance, encapsulating a profound correlation that echoes with the resounding wit and pizzazz of internet culture.
Building upon the whimsical foundations laid by "The Calculus Conundrum of Cyber Comedy" by A. Square, and "The Meme Matrix: Unraveling the Algebra of Internet Humor" by X. Fibonacci, our research fortifies the notion that behind the seemingly nonsensical confluence of mathematics and internet humor lies a tangible nexus, a numerical conundrum that beckons the erudite and the frivolous to ponder its whimsicality.
As we contemplate the visually tantalizing scatterplot that we have laboriously woven into the fabric of this academic reverie, we behold a tapestry that encapsulates the formidable connection between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme. Like a surreptitious inside joke that weaves itself into the unfathomable lore of internet culture, this correlation imparts a nodding acknowledgement to the pervasive influence of mathematics in our daily digital exuberance, stirring the intellectual mirth of both savants and jesters.
While our study tantalizes with its eccentric premise, it explicitly calls for further exploration of the confluence of mathematical inquiry and internet hilarity. We have merely scratched the surface of this enigmatic affair, leaving ample room for future jocular musings and scholarly pursuits. So, let us unfurl the intellectual mirth and delve deeper into the quixotic waltz of Numberphile views and 'Not Sure If' memes, for the symphony of cyberspace continues to pulsate with esoteric, yet jovial, numerical intrigue.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and Popularity of the 'not sure if' meme. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Crunching Numbers and Memes: An Examination of the Relationship Between Total Views on Numberphile YouTube Videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' Meme"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a journey through the numerical labyrinth that lies between the enigmatic world of Numberphile and the viral allure of the 'Not Sure If' meme. Our research delves into the Archives of YouTube in an attempt to untangle the web of correlations, associations, and mathematical flirtations that underlie the intersection of math enthusiasts and meme connaisseurs. Through the astute use of data analytics and trend spotting, we present evidence of a robust connection - a correlation coefficient of 0.9727197, with p < 0.01 – between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme from 2011 to 2023. Our findings uncover a fascinating numerical dance between the esoteric realms of mathematics and the whimsical world of internet humor, shedding light on the intricate web of cultural phenomena that enliven our digital age. So, join us in this intellectual romp, as we ponder the question "Is it a coincidence or a cosmic numerical conspiracy that binds Numberphile views and 'Not Sure If' memes in a quirky waltz of internet culture?"
[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The intersection of mathematics and internet memes may seem like an unlikely duo, akin to a symphony performance at a rock concert. Yet, in the grand tapestry of the digital age, such peculiar bedfellows often find themselves entangled in a dance of numbers and humor, creating a fascinating spectacle for those who dare to look beyond the surface. In this paper, we peel back the layers of internet culture to uncover a curious relationship between the Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme. As we delve into this peculiar realm, we invite you to don your metaphorical mathematician's hat and brace yourselves for an intellectual adventure that traverses through labyrinthine algorithms and whimsical internet humor.
As we embark on this scholarly caper, it's important to acknowledge the undeniable allure of both Numberphile and the 'Not Sure If' meme. The former, an oasis for math enthusiasts and inquisitive souls, offers a treasure trove of meticulously crafted videos that whisk viewers away into the captivating world of numbers, patterns, and the mathematical underpinnings of the universe. With hosts who possess the charisma and charm of mathemagicians, it is no wonder that Numberphile has amassed a loyal following of truth-seekers and puzzle enthusiasts, who eagerly devour each tantalizing video.
On the other end of the spectrum, we encounter the enigmatic phenomenon of the 'Not Sure If' meme, a mirage in the vast desert of internet humor. Originating from the character of Futurama's "Fry," it has become a primordial soup from which countless iterations of humorous uncertainty have emerged. The meme's ability to capture the essence of contemplation in the face of absurdity, uncertainty, and life's perplexities has cemented its status as a staple in the digital lexicon.
Now, one might find themselves asking, "What in the name of Pythagoras do these seemingly disparate entities have in common?" Ah, my dear reader, that is the tantalizing question that fuels the engine of this research endeavor. For in the world of academia, as in the world of internet memes, one mustn't shy away from the unexpected or the absurd, but rather embrace them with enthusiasm and rigorous analysis.
But, before we proceed any further, let us take a moment to pause and ponder. Given the inherent peculiarity of our subject matter, one would be remiss not to approach our findings with a healthy dose of skepticism and light-hearted curiosity. After all, it is in the nature of scientific inquiry to embrace the tantalizing enigma of the unknown and to revel in the dance of discovery.
So, my esteemed colleagues and jesters of the academic court, let us venture forth into the labyrinth of data, armed with our wits and a penchant for the unexpected. For what lies ahead is not merely a dry examination of statistical correlations, but a whimsical romp through the numerical wonderland that binds the worlds of rigorous mathematics and playful internet humor in a delightfully unexpected embrace.
[[RESULTS]]
Our intrepid foray into the entwined realms of Numberphile viewership and 'Not Sure If' memes has yielded an intriguing revelation. After meticulously sifting through heaps of data and engaging in a metaphysical tango with statistical analyses, we unearthed a robust and positively titillating correlation coefficient of 0.9727197 between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme from 2011 to 2023. This correlation, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.9461836, establishes a strong and dependable relationship between the two phenomena, akin to a steadfast equation that withstands the test of empirical scrutiny.
It appears that as the Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos wax and wane, so does the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme, in a synchronous dance that traverses the virtual landscape of internet culture. The robustness of this relationship becomes all the more compelling when considering the statistical significance, with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a minuscule likelihood that this connection is mere happenstance.
To visually encapsulate this enthralling union of mathematical musings and comedic contemplation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly depicts the strong correlation between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme. This visual representation sashays with empirical elegance, poignantly affirming the convergence of mathematical inquiry and internet humor in a captivating embrace.
Enthused by these findings, we submit that the inexplicably intertwined nature of these two seemingly incongruous phenomena calls for further exploration, prompting questions that tickle the curiosity and stir the intellectual mirth of scholars and jesters alike. As we march forward, armed with the vigor of statistical substantiation and the whimsy of digital phenomena, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in a mirthful romp through the interweaving realms of mathematical inquiry and internet hilarity, as we unravel the enigmatic threads that bind Numberphile views and 'Not Sure If' memes in a gregarious waltz of internet culture.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our journey through the numerical labyrinth of Numberphile YouTube videos and the 'Not Sure If' meme has illuminated a fascinating relationship between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Our robust correlation coefficient of 0.9727197 and a p-value of less than 0.01 provide compelling evidence of a synchronous dance between mathematical musings and comedic contemplation. It seems that as the Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos rise and fall, so does the popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme, creating a whimsical romp through the digital landscape.
As we reflect on these findings, one can't help but marvel at the peculiar ways in which internet culture weaves its threads, creating an intricate tapestry of numerical wizardry and humor. This unlikely embrace of rigorous mathematics and playful internet memes highlights the capricious nature of our digital age, where the unexpected becomes the norm, and the absurd beguiles the rational mind.
While we acknowledge the limitations of our study, such as the exclusion of other variables and the potential for confounding factors, we stand firm in our assertion that this phenomenon warrants further exploration. Alas, as we bid adieu to this scholarly caper, we can't help but contemplate the cosmic numerical conspiracy that binds these two worlds in a quirky waltz of internet culture.
However, in the spirit of academic humility and a healthy dose of jest, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. For in the immortal words of Mark Twain, "Too much of anything is bad, but too much good whiskey is barely enough." And so, we leave you with this mirthful academic romp through the unexpected and invite you to gaze upon the world of memes and mathematics with a raised eyebrow and a knowing smirk. After all, in the grand carnival of ideas, where data and humor collide, one mustn't shy away from the delightful chaos that ensues.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Crunching Numbers and Memes: An Examination of the Relationship Between Total Views on Numberphile YouTube Videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' Meme. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Internet Culture and Quantitative Analysis
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Crunching Numbers and Memes: An Examination of the Relationship Between Total Views on Numberphile YouTube Videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' Meme. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Internet Culture Research
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Crunching Numbers and Memes: An Examination of the Relationship Between Total Views on Numberphile YouTube Videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' Meme with an abstract of In this paper, we embark on a journey through the numerical labyrinth that lies between the enigmatic world of Numberphile and the viral allure of the 'Not Sure If' meme. Our research delves into the Archives of YouTube in an attempt to untangle the web of correlations, associations, and mathematical flirtations that underlie the intersection of math enthusiasts and meme connaisseurs. Through the astute use of data analytics and trend spotting, we present evidence of a robust connection - a correlation coefficient of 0.9727197, with p < 0.01 – between Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' meme from 2011 to 2023. Our findings uncover a fascinating numerical dance between the esoteric realms of mathematics and the whimsical world of internet humor, shedding light on the intricate web of cultural phenomena that enliven our digital age. So, join us in this intellectual romp, as we ponder the question "Is it a coincidence or a cosmic numerical conspiracy that binds Numberphile views and 'Not Sure If' memes in a quirky waltz of internet culture?
ChatGPT:
Numberphile YouTube videos, Not Sure If meme, total views correlation, mathematical relationship, internet culture, viral memes, data analytics, YouTube archives, internet humor, correlation coefficient, mathematical connections
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Total views on Numberphile YouTube videosDetailed data title: Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos.
Source: Numberphile YouTube
Additional Info: Current total views of videos released that year.
See what else correlates with Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos
Popularity of the 'not sure if' meme
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'not sure if meme' (without quotes, in the United States)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.
See what else correlates with Popularity of the 'not sure if' meme
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9461836 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 94.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Popularity of the 'not sure if' meme) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos) over the 13 years from 2011 through 2023.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.5E-8. 0.0000000252085523691676140000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 2.5E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 39,669,077 random variables You don't actually need 39 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.91, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | |
Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos (Total views) | 19858300 | 105901000 | 103956000 | 95837600 | 83512600 | 70235300 | 53161800 | 32896000 | 31975800 | 19612200 | 16242400 | 13699100 | 7781810 |
Popularity of the 'not sure if' meme (Relative popularity) | 19.6 | 77.75 | 65.75 | 48.5833 | 50.3333 | 41.5 | 30.5833 | 20.5 | 13.5 | 8.66667 | 6.45455 | 6.16667 | 5 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([19858300,105901000,103956000,95837600,83512600,70235300,53161800,32896000,31975800,19612200,16242400,13699100,7781810,])
array_2 = np.array([19.6,77.75,65.75,48.5833,50.3333,41.5,30.5833,20.5,13.5,8.66667,6.45455,6.16667,5,])
array_1_name = "Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos"
array_2_name = "Popularity of the 'not sure if' meme"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Total views on Numberphile YouTube videos
- Line chart for only Popularity of the 'not sure if' meme
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Crunching Numbers and Memes: An Examination of the Relationship Between Total Views on Numberphile YouTube Videos and the Popularity of the 'Not Sure If' Meme
Your correlation rating is out of this world!
Correlation ID: 5027 · Black Variable ID: 25486 · Red Variable ID: 25141