about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,026 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption and the second variable is Air quality in Pueblo, Colorado.  The chart goes from 1992 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The gasoline fumes formed a protective barrier around Pueblo, keeping pollutants out.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that depicts a TIME magazine cover with the following scene: In Pueblo, Colorado, a steady stream of cars and trucks travels along the US Highway, with gasoline fumes rising above the highway to form a thick protective barrier that shimmers in the sunlight, encapsulating the city and keeping pollutants out. The air quality in Pueblo remains pristine, thanks to this unusual phenomenon. Capture the essence of this unique spectacle with a focus on the reflective gasoline fumes and the surrounding cityscape, while keeping the visual depiction simple and free of any words or speech bubbles. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption and Air quality in Pueblo, Colorado. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute cartoon A TIME magazine cover image Realistic Pop art a funny image you would see on reddit
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption and Air quality in Pueblo, Colorado, in the following situation: The gasoline fumes formed a protective barrier around Pueblo, keeping pollutants out.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Pueblo, Colorado, a steady stream of cars and trucks travel along the US Highway, consuming gasoline as they go. Above the highway, a thick protective barrier of gasoline fumes shimmers in the sunlight, encapsulating the city and keeping pollutants out. The air quality in Pueblo remains pristine, thanks to this unusual phenomenon.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In Pueblo, Colorado, a steady stream of cars and trucks travel along the US Highway, consuming gasoline as they go. Above the highway, a thick protective barrier of gasoline fumes shimmers in the sunlight, encapsulating the city and keeping pollutants out. The air quality in Pueblo remains pristine, thanks to this unusual phenomenon. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that depicts a TIME magazine cover with the following scene: In Pueblo, Colorado, a steady stream of cars and trucks travels along the US Highway, with gasoline fumes rising above the highway to form a thick protective barrier that shimmers in the sunlight, encapsulating the city and keeping pollutants out. The air quality in Pueblo remains pristine, thanks to this unusual phenomenon. Capture the essence of this unique spectacle with a focus on the reflective gasoline fumes and the surrounding cityscape, while keeping the visual depiction simple and free of any words or speech bubbles.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption caused Air quality in Pueblo, Colorado to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Fueling the Debate: Analyzing the Relationship Between US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption and Air Quality in Pueblo, Colorado

The Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption and Air quality in Pueblo, Colorado. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Statista and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8834664 and p < 0.01 for 1992 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Debate: Analyzing the Relationship Between US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption and Air Quality in Pueblo, Colorado"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to examine the often overlooked link between US highway vehicle gasoline consumption and air quality in Pueblo, Colorado. Harnessing data from Statista and the Environmental Protection Agency, we embarked on a comprehensive assessment of this burning issue. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8834664 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1992 to 2020. The statistical significance of this relationship not only adds fuel to the ongoing conversation regarding environmental impact, but also sheds light on the air quality journey of Pueblo, akin to a car journey with unpredictable detours. Our research aims to drive home the importance of considering gasoline consumption as a key player in the air quality puzzle, serving as a reminder that when it comes to environmental studies, one cannot simply coast along on old assumptions.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption and Air quality in Pueblo, Colorado. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Debate: Analyzing the Relationship Between US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption and Air Quality in Pueblo, Colorado"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to examine the often overlooked link between US highway vehicle gasoline consumption and air quality in Pueblo, Colorado. Harnessing data from Statista and the Environmental Protection Agency, we embarked on a comprehensive assessment of this burning issue. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8834664 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1992 to 2020. The statistical significance of this relationship not only adds fuel to the ongoing conversation regarding environmental impact, but also sheds light on the air quality journey of Pueblo, akin to a car journey with unpredictable detours. Our research aims to drive home the importance of considering gasoline consumption as a key player in the air quality puzzle, serving as a reminder that when it comes to environmental studies, one cannot simply coast along on old assumptions.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The debate surrounding vehicle gasoline consumption and its impact on air quality has been fueling discussions among researchers, policymakers, and environmentalists for decades. Despite the obvious connection between the two, the extent of their relationship, particularly in the context of Pueblo, Colorado, has remained somewhat nebulous. This study endeavors to unravel the complexities of this association, guiding us through the convoluted highways of empirical data and statistical analysis.

The city of Pueblo, nestled comfortably in the arms of the Rocky Mountains, presents an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. Known for its remarkable steel production and the historic Arkansas Riverwalk, Pueblo has, in recent years, found itself at a crossroads where its scenic beauty intersects with concerns about air quality. Indeed, the juxtaposition of pristine mountain air with the exhaust fumes from vehicles is akin to an ecological oxymoron, prompting us to delve deeper into this enigmatic relationship.

As we navigate the lanes of this research endeavor, it is imperative to recognize the centrality of gasoline consumption within the broader environmental conversation. Similar to a car engine humming away, our study seeks to peel back the layers of complexity surrounding this issue, without stalling on the intricate details that drive these crucial discussions.

The aim of this study is not only to demystify the direct impact of gasoline consumption on air quality but also to pierce the smokescreen of ambiguity that has cloaked this issue for far too long. By doing so, we hope to rev up the dialogue on sustainable transportation practices and steer society toward cleaner, clearer skies. In the words of Henry Ford, "When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it." Let us take off against the wind and soar toward a future where our transportation choices nurture the air we breathe.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption and Air quality in Pueblo, Colorado. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Debate: Analyzing the Relationship Between US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption and Air Quality in Pueblo, Colorado"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to examine the often overlooked link between US highway vehicle gasoline consumption and air quality in Pueblo, Colorado. Harnessing data from Statista and the Environmental Protection Agency, we embarked on a comprehensive assessment of this burning issue. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8834664 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1992 to 2020. The statistical significance of this relationship not only adds fuel to the ongoing conversation regarding environmental impact, but also sheds light on the air quality journey of Pueblo, akin to a car journey with unpredictable detours. Our research aims to drive home the importance of considering gasoline consumption as a key player in the air quality puzzle, serving as a reminder that when it comes to environmental studies, one cannot simply coast along on old assumptions.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The debate surrounding vehicle gasoline consumption and its impact on air quality has been fueling discussions among researchers, policymakers, and environmentalists for decades. Despite the obvious connection between the two, the extent of their relationship, particularly in the context of Pueblo, Colorado, has remained somewhat nebulous. This study endeavors to unravel the complexities of this association, guiding us through the convoluted highways of empirical data and statistical analysis.
The city of Pueblo, nestled comfortably in the arms of the Rocky Mountains, presents an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. Known for its remarkable steel production and the historic Arkansas Riverwalk, Pueblo has, in recent years, found itself at a crossroads where its scenic beauty intersects with concerns about air quality. Indeed, the juxtaposition of pristine mountain air with the exhaust fumes from vehicles is akin to an ecological oxymoron, prompting us to delve deeper into this enigmatic relationship.
As we navigate the lanes of this research endeavor, it is imperative to recognize the centrality of gasoline consumption within the broader environmental conversation. Similar to a car engine humming away, our study seeks to peel back the layers of complexity surrounding this issue, without stalling on the intricate details that drive these crucial discussions.
The aim of this study is not only to demystify the direct impact of gasoline consumption on air quality but also to pierce the smokescreen of ambiguity that has cloaked this issue for far too long. By doing so, we hope to rev up the dialogue on sustainable transportation practices and steer society toward cleaner, clearer skies. In the words of Henry Ford, "When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it." Let us take off against the wind and soar toward a future where our transportation choices nurture the air we breathe.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literature on the relationship between US highway vehicle gasoline consumption and air quality in Pueblo, Colorado is a winding road of scholarly inquiry, punctuated by serious studies and the occasional detour into unexpected references. Smith et al. (2015) found a direct correlation between increasing gasoline consumption and deteriorating air quality, reinforcing the need for sustained efforts to mitigate vehicular emissions. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2017) elucidated the intricate interplay between gasoline consumption patterns and nitrogen oxide levels, highlighting the far-reaching implications for air quality management in urban areas.

In "The Economics of Air Pollution" by Thomas Sterner, the authors analyze the economic impact of vehicular emissions on air quality, providing a comprehensive overview of the external costs associated with gasoline consumption. This detailed examination, much like a thorough emissions test, dissects the various pollutants emitted from vehicles and their effects on the local environment - a crucial piece of the puzzle in understanding the broader implications of gasoline consumption.

Furthermore, "The Silent Spring" by Rachel Carson offers a poignant reflection on the consequences of environmental degradation, serving as a somber reminder of the stakes involved in addressing air quality concerns. While not directly focused on gasoline consumption, this influential work delivers a sobering perspective on the toll of pollution, sounding a clarion call for meaningful action in safeguarding our planet's ecological balance.

On a lighter note, the novel "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams takes readers on a whimsical journey through outer space, prompting us to ponder the vastness of the universe and our place within it. While seemingly unrelated to the topic at hand, this literary escapade underscores the interconnectedness of all things, including the invisible threads linking gasoline consumption to air quality in unexpected ways.

In a surprising twist, the movies "Cars" and "Planes" provide an entertaining backdrop for exploring the cultural nuances of our fascination with automotive transportation. Though animated, these films offer a playful yet insightful exploration of the human-machine relationship, reminding us that even fictional automobiles have a role to play in shaping our perceptions of gasoline consumption and its environmental repercussions.

As we navigate through this diverse terrain of literature, it becomes evident that the connection between US highway vehicle gasoline consumption and air quality in Pueblo, Colorado is not merely a matter of dry statistics and technical analyses. It encompasses a tapestry of human experiences, ecological realities, and a touch of whimsy, reminding us that even in the most serious of matters, a sprinkle of humor can help to clear the air.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption and Air quality in Pueblo, Colorado. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 1992 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Debate: Analyzing the Relationship Between US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption and Air Quality in Pueblo, Colorado"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to examine the often overlooked link between US highway vehicle gasoline consumption and air quality in Pueblo, Colorado. Harnessing data from Statista and the Environmental Protection Agency, we embarked on a comprehensive assessment of this burning issue. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8834664 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1992 to 2020. The statistical significance of this relationship not only adds fuel to the ongoing conversation regarding environmental impact, but also sheds light on the air quality journey of Pueblo, akin to a car journey with unpredictable detours. Our research aims to drive home the importance of considering gasoline consumption as a key player in the air quality puzzle, serving as a reminder that when it comes to environmental studies, one cannot simply coast along on old assumptions.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The debate surrounding vehicle gasoline consumption and its impact on air quality has been fueling discussions among researchers, policymakers, and environmentalists for decades. Despite the obvious connection between the two, the extent of their relationship, particularly in the context of Pueblo, Colorado, has remained somewhat nebulous. This study endeavors to unravel the complexities of this association, guiding us through the convoluted highways of empirical data and statistical analysis.
The city of Pueblo, nestled comfortably in the arms of the Rocky Mountains, presents an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. Known for its remarkable steel production and the historic Arkansas Riverwalk, Pueblo has, in recent years, found itself at a crossroads where its scenic beauty intersects with concerns about air quality. Indeed, the juxtaposition of pristine mountain air with the exhaust fumes from vehicles is akin to an ecological oxymoron, prompting us to delve deeper into this enigmatic relationship.
As we navigate the lanes of this research endeavor, it is imperative to recognize the centrality of gasoline consumption within the broader environmental conversation. Similar to a car engine humming away, our study seeks to peel back the layers of complexity surrounding this issue, without stalling on the intricate details that drive these crucial discussions.
The aim of this study is not only to demystify the direct impact of gasoline consumption on air quality but also to pierce the smokescreen of ambiguity that has cloaked this issue for far too long. By doing so, we hope to rev up the dialogue on sustainable transportation practices and steer society toward cleaner, clearer skies. In the words of Henry Ford, "When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it." Let us take off against the wind and soar toward a future where our transportation choices nurture the air we breathe.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To commence our investigation, our team hopped on the information superhighway and cruised through various data repositories, notably Statista and the Environmental Protection Agency website, to procure the necessary statistics for US highway vehicle gasoline consumption and air quality parameters in Pueblo, Colorado. We meticulously selected data spanning the years 1992 to 2020, ensuring that our analysis encompassed a wide range of environmental and vehicular behaviors, much like a virtual road trip through the annals of digital archives.

The first pit stop on our data collection journey involved the extraction of US highway vehicle gasoline consumption data, which we unearthed from the depths of online databases with the fervor of an archeologist on a quest for hidden treasures. Concurrently, we delved into the realm of air quality metrics, sifting through the virtual smog of information to glean the relevant pollutant levels and atmospheric parameters, much like searching for a clean rest area amidst a fog of diesel fumes.

Once we had assembled our digital convoy of datasets, we embarked on the arduous task of data wrangling—a process akin to navigating a particularly congested intersection—wherein we organized, cleaned, and standardized the disparate data sources into a unified format, ensuring a seamless and harmonious blend of statistical ingredients, much like mixing gasoline and air in the combustion chamber of an analytical engine.

Subsequently, we unleashed the formidable power of statistical analysis, employing various models and techniques, such as regression analysis and time series modeling, to excavate the buried relationships between US highway vehicle gasoline consumption and air quality indicators in Pueblo, Colorado. Our statistical odyssey through the labyrinthine corridors of numerical algorithms sought to unveil the hidden patterns and associations, analogous to deciphering a cryptic map of environmental intricacies.

With our analytical compass firmly in hand, we applied rigorous statistical tests to evaluate the robustness and significance of the observed relationships, ensuring that our findings were not mere statistical mirages but represented genuine connections, as tangible as the asphalt beneath the wheels of our research vehicle.

To ensure the reliability and validity of our findings, we conducted sensitivity analyses and validation procedures, akin to performing routine maintenance checks on a research instrument, affirming that our results were not mere artifacts of the analytical machinery but were grounded in empirical realities, analogous to verifying the accuracy of a GPS navigation system before embarking on an expedition into the unknown realms of statistical inferences.

Finally, we subjected our synthesized results to critical peer review, inviting fellow researchers to scrutinize our findings with the incisiveness of an eagle-eyed highway patrol officer, ensuring that our conclusions stood firm in the face of scholarly scrutiny and did not succumb to the perils of methodological roadblocks or statistical speed bumps.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption and Air quality in Pueblo, Colorado. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and Environmental Protection Agency .

For the time period 1992 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8834664, r-squared of 0.7805128, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Debate: Analyzing the Relationship Between US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption and Air Quality in Pueblo, Colorado"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to examine the often overlooked link between US highway vehicle gasoline consumption and air quality in Pueblo, Colorado. Harnessing data from Statista and the Environmental Protection Agency, we embarked on a comprehensive assessment of this burning issue. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8834664 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1992 to 2020. The statistical significance of this relationship not only adds fuel to the ongoing conversation regarding environmental impact, but also sheds light on the air quality journey of Pueblo, akin to a car journey with unpredictable detours. Our research aims to drive home the importance of considering gasoline consumption as a key player in the air quality puzzle, serving as a reminder that when it comes to environmental studies, one cannot simply coast along on old assumptions.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The debate surrounding vehicle gasoline consumption and its impact on air quality has been fueling discussions among researchers, policymakers, and environmentalists for decades. Despite the obvious connection between the two, the extent of their relationship, particularly in the context of Pueblo, Colorado, has remained somewhat nebulous. This study endeavors to unravel the complexities of this association, guiding us through the convoluted highways of empirical data and statistical analysis.
The city of Pueblo, nestled comfortably in the arms of the Rocky Mountains, presents an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. Known for its remarkable steel production and the historic Arkansas Riverwalk, Pueblo has, in recent years, found itself at a crossroads where its scenic beauty intersects with concerns about air quality. Indeed, the juxtaposition of pristine mountain air with the exhaust fumes from vehicles is akin to an ecological oxymoron, prompting us to delve deeper into this enigmatic relationship.
As we navigate the lanes of this research endeavor, it is imperative to recognize the centrality of gasoline consumption within the broader environmental conversation. Similar to a car engine humming away, our study seeks to peel back the layers of complexity surrounding this issue, without stalling on the intricate details that drive these crucial discussions.
The aim of this study is not only to demystify the direct impact of gasoline consumption on air quality but also to pierce the smokescreen of ambiguity that has cloaked this issue for far too long. By doing so, we hope to rev up the dialogue on sustainable transportation practices and steer society toward cleaner, clearer skies. In the words of Henry Ford, "When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it." Let us take off against the wind and soar toward a future where our transportation choices nurture the air we breathe.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The crux of our investigation centered on unraveling the relationship between US highway vehicle gasoline consumption and air quality in Pueblo, Colorado. Our data analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8834664, with an r-squared value of 0.7805128, and the elusive p < 0.01, signifying a statistically significant connection between these two variables. The sheer strength of this correlation could make even the most stoic statistician whistle with awe.

Fig. 1 depicts a scatterplot that visually encapsulates this formidable correlation, with data points resembling constellations aligning themselves in a cosmic dance of statistical significance. It's almost as if the data itself choreographed a ballet of correlation, twirling through the complexities of gasoline consumption and air quality with an elegant grace that would make Swan Lake seem like a child's play.

Our findings serve as a beacon, illuminating the often obscured intersection of vehicular gasoline consumption and air quality, akin to a lighthouse guiding ships through turbulent waters. Just as a lighthouse stands tall against crashing waves, we hope that our research will stand as a guiding light for environmental discourse, steering conversations toward cleaner, clearer skies and away from the murky abyss of misinformation.

In essence, our results not only affirm the undeniable link between gasoline consumption and air quality but also inject fresh momentum into the ongoing conversation about sustainable transportation and environmental stewardship. Like a well-oiled engine, this correlation fuels the ongoing debate and propels us toward crafting policies and practices that prioritize the health of our planet. Our findings underscore the need to rev up efforts to steer society toward a greener future, where the air we breathe is as pure as a freshly opened can of gasoline—minus the fumes, of course.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption and Air quality in Pueblo, Colorado. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Debate: Analyzing the Relationship Between US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption and Air Quality in Pueblo, Colorado"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to examine the often overlooked link between US highway vehicle gasoline consumption and air quality in Pueblo, Colorado. Harnessing data from Statista and the Environmental Protection Agency, we embarked on a comprehensive assessment of this burning issue. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8834664 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1992 to 2020. The statistical significance of this relationship not only adds fuel to the ongoing conversation regarding environmental impact, but also sheds light on the air quality journey of Pueblo, akin to a car journey with unpredictable detours. Our research aims to drive home the importance of considering gasoline consumption as a key player in the air quality puzzle, serving as a reminder that when it comes to environmental studies, one cannot simply coast along on old assumptions.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature on the relationship between US highway vehicle gasoline consumption and air quality in Pueblo, Colorado is a winding road of scholarly inquiry, punctuated by serious studies and the occasional detour into unexpected references. Smith et al. (2015) found a direct correlation between increasing gasoline consumption and deteriorating air quality, reinforcing the need for sustained efforts to mitigate vehicular emissions. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2017) elucidated the intricate interplay between gasoline consumption patterns and nitrogen oxide levels, highlighting the far-reaching implications for air quality management in urban areas.
In "The Economics of Air Pollution" by Thomas Sterner, the authors analyze the economic impact of vehicular emissions on air quality, providing a comprehensive overview of the external costs associated with gasoline consumption. This detailed examination, much like a thorough emissions test, dissects the various pollutants emitted from vehicles and their effects on the local environment - a crucial piece of the puzzle in understanding the broader implications of gasoline consumption.
Furthermore, "The Silent Spring" by Rachel Carson offers a poignant reflection on the consequences of environmental degradation, serving as a somber reminder of the stakes involved in addressing air quality concerns. While not directly focused on gasoline consumption, this influential work delivers a sobering perspective on the toll of pollution, sounding a clarion call for meaningful action in safeguarding our planet's ecological balance.
On a lighter note, the novel "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams takes readers on a whimsical journey through outer space, prompting us to ponder the vastness of the universe and our place within it. While seemingly unrelated to the topic at hand, this literary escapade underscores the interconnectedness of all things, including the invisible threads linking gasoline consumption to air quality in unexpected ways.
In a surprising twist, the movies "Cars" and "Planes" provide an entertaining backdrop for exploring the cultural nuances of our fascination with automotive transportation. Though animated, these films offer a playful yet insightful exploration of the human-machine relationship, reminding us that even fictional automobiles have a role to play in shaping our perceptions of gasoline consumption and its environmental repercussions.
As we navigate through this diverse terrain of literature, it becomes evident that the connection between US highway vehicle gasoline consumption and air quality in Pueblo, Colorado is not merely a matter of dry statistics and technical analyses. It encompasses a tapestry of human experiences, ecological realities, and a touch of whimsy, reminding us that even in the most serious of matters, a sprinkle of humor can help to clear the air.

[[RESULTS]]
The crux of our investigation centered on unraveling the relationship between US highway vehicle gasoline consumption and air quality in Pueblo, Colorado. Our data analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8834664, with an r-squared value of 0.7805128, and the elusive p < 0.01, signifying a statistically significant connection between these two variables. The sheer strength of this correlation could make even the most stoic statistician whistle with awe.
Fig. 1 depicts a scatterplot that visually encapsulates this formidable correlation, with data points resembling constellations aligning themselves in a cosmic dance of statistical significance. It's almost as if the data itself choreographed a ballet of correlation, twirling through the complexities of gasoline consumption and air quality with an elegant grace that would make Swan Lake seem like a child's play.
Our findings serve as a beacon, illuminating the often obscured intersection of vehicular gasoline consumption and air quality, akin to a lighthouse guiding ships through turbulent waters. Just as a lighthouse stands tall against crashing waves, we hope that our research will stand as a guiding light for environmental discourse, steering conversations toward cleaner, clearer skies and away from the murky abyss of misinformation.
In essence, our results not only affirm the undeniable link between gasoline consumption and air quality but also inject fresh momentum into the ongoing conversation about sustainable transportation and environmental stewardship. Like a well-oiled engine, this correlation fuels the ongoing debate and propels us toward crafting policies and practices that prioritize the health of our planet. Our findings underscore the need to rev up efforts to steer society toward a greener future, where the air we breathe is as pure as a freshly opened can of gasoline—minus the fumes, of course.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study sought to scrutinize the intricate relationship between US highway vehicle gasoline consumption and air quality in Pueblo, Colorado, shedding light on the invisible dance between vehicular emissions and atmospheric purity. Drawing from the scholarly journey mapped out in the literature review, replete with serious studies and the occasional detour into unexpected references, we charted a course to unravel the profound impact of gasoline consumption on air quality. Our findings not only aligned with prior research but also added a touch of whimsy to the contentious discourse, akin to a surprise twist in an otherwise serious plot.

The robust correlation coefficient we unearthed echoes the work of Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2017), affirming the direct link between increasing gasoline consumption and deteriorating air quality. However, our results seemed to cheekily wink in the direction of "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams, reminding us of the interconnectedness of all things, including the seemingly improbable link between gasoline consumption and air quality. Just as Adams took readers on a whimsical journey through outer space, our findings jolted the conversation into orbit, prompting us to ponder the vastness of the universe and our place within it.

Moreover, the statistical significance of our results, with the elusive p < 0.01 making even the most stoic statistician whistle with awe, underscored the economic impact of vehicular emissions on air quality, aligning with the insights offered by Sterner's "The Economics of Air Pollution." It was as if our data plotted a cosmic dance of statistical significance, twirling through the complexities of gasoline consumption and air quality with an elegant grace that would make Swan Lake seem like a child's play, highlighting the undeniable link between vehicular emissions and atmospheric clarity.

The scatterplot, figuratively resembling constellations aligning themselves in a celestial ballet of correlation, visually encapsulated the formidable connection between gasoline consumption and air quality, much like a lighthouse guiding ships through turbulent waters. Our research calls for sustained efforts to steer society toward a greener future where the air we breathe is as pure as a freshly opened can of gasoline—minus the fumes, of course. In essence, our findings served as a beacon, illuminating the obscured intersection of vehicular gasoline consumption and air quality, steering conversations toward cleaner, clearer skies and away from the murky abyss of misinformation.

As we navigate through this diverse terrain of statistical analysis, it becomes evident that the connection between US highway vehicle gasoline consumption and air quality in Pueblo, Colorado is not merely a matter of dry statistics and technical analyses. It encompasses a tapestry of human experiences, ecological realities, and a touch of whimsy, reminding us that even in the most serious of matters, a sprinkle of humor can help to clear the air.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption and Air quality in Pueblo, Colorado. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Debate: Analyzing the Relationship Between US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption and Air Quality in Pueblo, Colorado"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to examine the often overlooked link between US highway vehicle gasoline consumption and air quality in Pueblo, Colorado. Harnessing data from Statista and the Environmental Protection Agency, we embarked on a comprehensive assessment of this burning issue. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8834664 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1992 to 2020. The statistical significance of this relationship not only adds fuel to the ongoing conversation regarding environmental impact, but also sheds light on the air quality journey of Pueblo, akin to a car journey with unpredictable detours. Our research aims to drive home the importance of considering gasoline consumption as a key player in the air quality puzzle, serving as a reminder that when it comes to environmental studies, one cannot simply coast along on old assumptions.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The debate surrounding vehicle gasoline consumption and its impact on air quality has been fueling discussions among researchers, policymakers, and environmentalists for decades. Despite the obvious connection between the two, the extent of their relationship, particularly in the context of Pueblo, Colorado, has remained somewhat nebulous. This study endeavors to unravel the complexities of this association, guiding us through the convoluted highways of empirical data and statistical analysis.
The city of Pueblo, nestled comfortably in the arms of the Rocky Mountains, presents an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. Known for its remarkable steel production and the historic Arkansas Riverwalk, Pueblo has, in recent years, found itself at a crossroads where its scenic beauty intersects with concerns about air quality. Indeed, the juxtaposition of pristine mountain air with the exhaust fumes from vehicles is akin to an ecological oxymoron, prompting us to delve deeper into this enigmatic relationship.
As we navigate the lanes of this research endeavor, it is imperative to recognize the centrality of gasoline consumption within the broader environmental conversation. Similar to a car engine humming away, our study seeks to peel back the layers of complexity surrounding this issue, without stalling on the intricate details that drive these crucial discussions.
The aim of this study is not only to demystify the direct impact of gasoline consumption on air quality but also to pierce the smokescreen of ambiguity that has cloaked this issue for far too long. By doing so, we hope to rev up the dialogue on sustainable transportation practices and steer society toward cleaner, clearer skies. In the words of Henry Ford, "When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it." Let us take off against the wind and soar toward a future where our transportation choices nurture the air we breathe.

[[RESULTS]]
The crux of our investigation centered on unraveling the relationship between US highway vehicle gasoline consumption and air quality in Pueblo, Colorado. Our data analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8834664, with an r-squared value of 0.7805128, and the elusive p < 0.01, signifying a statistically significant connection between these two variables. The sheer strength of this correlation could make even the most stoic statistician whistle with awe.
Fig. 1 depicts a scatterplot that visually encapsulates this formidable correlation, with data points resembling constellations aligning themselves in a cosmic dance of statistical significance. It's almost as if the data itself choreographed a ballet of correlation, twirling through the complexities of gasoline consumption and air quality with an elegant grace that would make Swan Lake seem like a child's play.
Our findings serve as a beacon, illuminating the often obscured intersection of vehicular gasoline consumption and air quality, akin to a lighthouse guiding ships through turbulent waters. Just as a lighthouse stands tall against crashing waves, we hope that our research will stand as a guiding light for environmental discourse, steering conversations toward cleaner, clearer skies and away from the murky abyss of misinformation.
In essence, our results not only affirm the undeniable link between gasoline consumption and air quality but also inject fresh momentum into the ongoing conversation about sustainable transportation and environmental stewardship. Like a well-oiled engine, this correlation fuels the ongoing debate and propels us toward crafting policies and practices that prioritize the health of our planet. Our findings underscore the need to rev up efforts to steer society toward a greener future, where the air we breathe is as pure as a freshly opened can of gasoline—minus the fumes, of course.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has provided compelling evidence of the strong and significant relationship between US highway vehicle gasoline consumption and air quality in Pueblo, Colorado. The correlation coefficient of 0.8834664 not only left us awe-struck but also made us wonder why we didn't have such perfectly correlated data for everything in life. The statistical significance of this connection is akin to finding that perfect parking spot on a crowded street – rare and immensely satisfying.

The data, much like an unexpected detour on a road trip, led us to realize the crucial role of gasoline consumption in the air quality puzzle. The elegance of the correlation scatterplot inspired imagery of a cosmic dance of statistical significance, proving that even in the world of empirical analysis, there is beauty to be found. It was as if the data itself orchestrated a ballet of correlation, with each data point gracefully twirling through the complexities of gasoline consumption and air quality.

Our findings act as a guiding light, illuminating the obscured intersection between vehicular gasoline consumption and air quality like a lighthouse guiding ships through turbulent waters, or in this case, guiding data analysts through convoluted statistical models. The results not only affirm the undeniable link between gasoline consumption and air quality but also inject fresh momentum into the ongoing conversation about sustainable transportation and environmental stewardship.

In essence, our research highlights the need to rev up efforts toward a greener future – a future where the air we breathe is as pure as a freshly opened can of gasoline, without the fumes, of course. With such compelling evidence, it's safe to say that no more research is needed in this area. We're driving off into the sunset of conclusive findings, leaving behind the fumes of uncertainty.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fueling the Debate: Analyzing the Relationship Between US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption and Air Quality in Pueblo, Colorado. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fueling the Debate: Analyzing the Relationship Between US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption and Air Quality in Pueblo, Colorado. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Sustainable Transportation and Environmental Research Neuroscience


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fueling the Debate: Analyzing the Relationship Between US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption and Air Quality in Pueblo, Colorado with an abstract of In this study, we set out to examine the often overlooked link between US highway vehicle gasoline consumption and air quality in Pueblo, Colorado. Harnessing data from Statista and the Environmental Protection Agency, we embarked on a comprehensive assessment of this burning issue. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8834664 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 1992 to 2020. The statistical significance of this relationship not only adds fuel to the ongoing conversation regarding environmental impact, but also sheds light on the air quality journey of Pueblo, akin to a car journey with unpredictable detours. Our research aims to drive home the importance of considering gasoline consumption as a key player in the air quality puzzle, serving as a reminder that when it comes to environmental studies, one cannot simply coast along on old assumptions.

ChatGPT:

US highway vehicle gasoline consumption, air quality, Pueblo Colorado, correlation coefficient, environmental impact, gasoline consumption, Environmental Protection Agency, Statista, air quality journey, environmental studies, statistical significance, environmental impact, pollution, vehicle emissions, greenhouse gas emissions

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption

Air quality in Pueblo, Colorado
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with good air quality in Pueblo, CO
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air quality in Pueblo, Colorado

Correlation r = 0.8834664 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7805128 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 78.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air quality in Pueblo, Colorado) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption) over the 29 years from 1992 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.2E-10. 0.0000000002192557894846911500
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.88 in 2.2E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 4,560,882,987 random variables You don't actually need 4 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 28 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 28 because we have two variables measured over a period of 29 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.76, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption (Gasoline-equivalent gallons)110135000000111323000000113144000000115943000000117783000000119336000000122849000000125111000000125720000000127768000000131299000000135330000000138283000000138723000000140146000000140646000000134644000000134385000000134687000000130597000000131253000000131299000000133648000000132243000000135472000000135300000000135246000000136078000000117251000000
Air quality in Pueblo, Colorado (Good air quality)000000097.457688.888986.490.697792.968894.495.967782.945793.7590.845174.626994.366296.031795.488792.12695.967795.348898.43759695.121999.20640




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([110135000000,111323000000,113144000000,115943000000,117783000000,119336000000,122849000000,125111000000,125720000000,127768000000,131299000000,135330000000,138283000000,138723000000,140146000000,140646000000,134644000000,134385000000,134687000000,130597000000,131253000000,131299000000,133648000000,132243000000,135472000000,135300000000,135246000000,136078000000,117251000000,])
array_2 = np.array([0,0,0,0,0,0,0,97.4576,88.8889,86.4,90.6977,92.9688,94.4,95.9677,82.9457,93.75,90.8451,74.6269,94.3662,96.0317,95.4887,92.126,95.9677,95.3488,98.4375,96,95.1219,99.2064,0,])
array_1_name = "US Highway Vehicle Gasoline Consumption"
array_2_name = "Air quality in Pueblo, Colorado"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 5026 · Black Variable ID: 156 · Red Variable ID: 21107
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0