about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,024 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Thomas and the second variable is Gasoline pumped in France.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Fewer people were using the name Thomas as their secret code to access underground gasoline reserves, leading to a decrease in unauthorized fuel pumping in France.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a French town with charming, old-world architecture. In the center, depict a group of children eagerly huddled around a meticulously detailed model train set. The nostalgic atmosphere is emphasized by muted colors and a classic halftone pattern, as if the scene were plucked from a vintage comic book. The hand-cranked mechanism of the model train should be prominently visible, captivating the children and hinting at a bygone era of simpler, more eco-friendly entertainment. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Thomas and Gasoline pumped in France. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: High-tech Whimsical illustration A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Scalar art Sci-fi fantacy
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Thomas and Gasoline pumped in France, in the following situation: Parents were less likely to name their children Thomas, leading to a collective lack of interest in trains, which resulted in fewer people using gasoline to power their model train sets.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small French town, a group of children gather around a model train set, their faces lighting up with excitement as the tiny locomotive chugs along the tracks. However, the train set is powered not by gasoline, but by a hand-cranked mechanism. The parents of the children had opted for less popular names, and as a result, the fascination with trains had waned, leading to a decline in the use of gasoline-powered model trains.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In a small French town, a group of children gather around a model train set, their faces lighting up with excitement as the tiny locomotive chugs along the tracks. However, the train set is powered not by gasoline, but by a hand-cranked mechanism. The parents of the children had opted for less popular names, and as a result, the fascination with trains had waned, leading to a decline in the use of gasoline-powered model trains. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a French town with charming, old-world architecture. In the center, depict a group of children eagerly huddled around a meticulously detailed model train set. The nostalgic atmosphere is emphasized by muted colors and a classic halftone pattern, as if the scene were plucked from a vintage comic book. The hand-cranked mechanism of the model train should be prominently visible, captivating the children and hinting at a bygone era of simpler, more eco-friendly entertainment.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Thomas caused Gasoline pumped in France to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Thomas Trend: Exploring the Pump-ularity of Gasoline in France

The International Journal of Fuel Fashions

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thomas and Gasoline pumped in France. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9856517 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Thomas Trend: Exploring the Pump-ularity of Gasoline in France"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name "Thomas" and the volume of gasoline pumped in France. By leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this unconventional relationship, uncovering a surprising connection. Our findings boast a correlation coefficient of 0.9856517, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1980 to 2022.

Amidst our analyses, it became evident that the name "Thomas" holds an uncanny influence on the fuel consumption patterns in France, raising the question, "Are individuals with this moniker driving the demand for gasoline?" It seems that Thomas is not only "tankful" in terms of popularity, but also in driving the fuel economy – talk about a gas-tly impact!

This study sheds light on the whimsical interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated variables and opens a door to contemplating the synergistic interplay between personal nomenclature and energy consumption.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thomas and Gasoline pumped in France. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Thomas Trend: Exploring the Pump-ularity of Gasoline in France"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name "Thomas" and the volume of gasoline pumped in France. By leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this unconventional relationship, uncovering a surprising connection. Our findings boast a correlation coefficient of 0.9856517, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1980 to 2022.

Amidst our analyses, it became evident that the name "Thomas" holds an uncanny influence on the fuel consumption patterns in France, raising the question, "Are individuals with this moniker driving the demand for gasoline?" It seems that Thomas is not only "tankful" in terms of popularity, but also in driving the fuel economy – talk about a gas-tly impact!

This study sheds light on the whimsical interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated variables and opens a door to contemplating the synergistic interplay between personal nomenclature and energy consumption.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Attention all pun enthusiasts, data aficionados, and curious minds alike! Buckle up and get ready to embark on a journey into the world of correlations and conjectures, where seemingly disparate variables converge in unexpected ways. In this paper, we venture into the peculiar realms of nomenclature and fuel consumption, dissecting the enigmatic association between the first name "Thomas" and the gasoline pumped in France.

This study ventures to answer the question that might have been lurking in the minds of many: "What do the first name Thomas and gasoline consumption in France have in common?" Well, friends, brace yourselves for a "fuel" of surprises because we have uncovered a correlation so striking that it might just leave you "gasping" for more.

But first, let's address the elephant in the room – why did the scientist install a knocker on his door? Because he wanted to win the No-bell prize! Alright, alright, let's refocus our attention on the matter at hand – the Thomas trend and its influence on the gasoline pump-ularity in France.

As we dive into this fascinating exploration, we not only aim to unveil the statistical relationships between "Thomas" and gasoline consumption but also to demonstrate the potential ripple effect of naming conventions on seemingly unrelated aspects of daily life. Are you ready to embark on this whimsical and thought-provoking journey? If so, let's "fuel" up our curiosity and explore the unexpected nuances of this intriguing correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thomas and Gasoline pumped in France. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Thomas Trend: Exploring the Pump-ularity of Gasoline in France"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name "Thomas" and the volume of gasoline pumped in France. By leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this unconventional relationship, uncovering a surprising connection. Our findings boast a correlation coefficient of 0.9856517, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1980 to 2022.

Amidst our analyses, it became evident that the name "Thomas" holds an uncanny influence on the fuel consumption patterns in France, raising the question, "Are individuals with this moniker driving the demand for gasoline?" It seems that Thomas is not only "tankful" in terms of popularity, but also in driving the fuel economy – talk about a gas-tly impact!

This study sheds light on the whimsical interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated variables and opens a door to contemplating the synergistic interplay between personal nomenclature and energy consumption.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Attention all pun enthusiasts, data aficionados, and curious minds alike! Buckle up and get ready to embark on a journey into the world of correlations and conjectures, where seemingly disparate variables converge in unexpected ways. In this paper, we venture into the peculiar realms of nomenclature and fuel consumption, dissecting the enigmatic association between the first name "Thomas" and the gasoline pumped in France.
This study ventures to answer the question that might have been lurking in the minds of many: "What do the first name Thomas and gasoline consumption in France have in common?" Well, friends, brace yourselves for a "fuel" of surprises because we have uncovered a correlation so striking that it might just leave you "gasping" for more.
But first, let's address the elephant in the room – why did the scientist install a knocker on his door? Because he wanted to win the No-bell prize! Alright, alright, let's refocus our attention on the matter at hand – the Thomas trend and its influence on the gasoline pump-ularity in France.
As we dive into this fascinating exploration, we not only aim to unveil the statistical relationships between "Thomas" and gasoline consumption but also to demonstrate the potential ripple effect of naming conventions on seemingly unrelated aspects of daily life. Are you ready to embark on this whimsical and thought-provoking journey? If so, let's "fuel" up our curiosity and explore the unexpected nuances of this intriguing correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, "The Thomas Effect: A Name to Fuel Connection," Smith and Doe investigated the potential influence of the first name "Thomas" on gasoline consumption patterns. Through an exhaustive analysis of birth records and fuel consumption data, the authors found a curious correlation, sparking widespread interest in the peculiar relationship between personal nomenclature and energy usage. As they delved deeper into their research, they offered a perceptive insight: "Perhaps the Thomas trend extends beyond mere popularity and transcends into the realm of everyday habits, including the demand for gasoline."

Speaking of demand for gasoline, have you heard about the petroleum puns? They're quite fuel-larious!

Jones and Williams further delved into this captivating subject in their article, "Thomas, Throttle, and Tank: Unraveling the Enigma." Their study focused on the socio-economic implications of the Thomas phenomenon, positing that the widespread adoption of this name could potentially sway consumer behaviors, even in the realm of fuel consumption. The authors highlighted, "The Thomas trend may not be a mere coincidence but a compelling factor in shaping energy consumption patterns."

On a related note, have you ever considered why the name Thomas is so common? Because it's a "trains" name, and it keeps "engine"-ering its way into popularity!

Turning to non-fiction literature that converges on the subject matter, "The Energy Dilemma: From Thomas to Transportation" by Emily Smith delves into the intricate interplay between personal identities and energy dynamics. While the book primarily addresses broader environmental concerns, it sparks curiosity about the potential implications of naming trends on specific sectors like transportation and fuel usage.

In the realm of fiction, the novel "Fuelled by Thomas: A Name-Changing Odyssey" by A. C. Diesel presents a whimsical tale of a protagonist named Thomas whose actions mysteriously seem to impact gasoline consumption in a fictionalized version of France - talk about a creative spin on correlating names and fuel!

Furthermore, social media platforms have not been immune to discussions on this captivating correlation. A tweet by @PunnyDriver quipped, "Who would have thought that the name Thomas could have a 'fuelly' impact on French gas stations? Maybe it's time for a statistical study on John and petroleum jelly sales next!"

In conclusion, the literature surrounding the interconnectedness of the first name "Thomas" and gasoline consumption in France encompasses an intriguing blend of scholarly inquiry, light-hearted humor, and unexpected connections. This body of work serves as a testament to the endless wonders of statistical analysis, all while leaving the reader with a chuckle or two along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thomas and Gasoline pumped in France. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1980 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Thomas Trend: Exploring the Pump-ularity of Gasoline in France"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name "Thomas" and the volume of gasoline pumped in France. By leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this unconventional relationship, uncovering a surprising connection. Our findings boast a correlation coefficient of 0.9856517, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1980 to 2022.

Amidst our analyses, it became evident that the name "Thomas" holds an uncanny influence on the fuel consumption patterns in France, raising the question, "Are individuals with this moniker driving the demand for gasoline?" It seems that Thomas is not only "tankful" in terms of popularity, but also in driving the fuel economy – talk about a gas-tly impact!

This study sheds light on the whimsical interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated variables and opens a door to contemplating the synergistic interplay between personal nomenclature and energy consumption.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Attention all pun enthusiasts, data aficionados, and curious minds alike! Buckle up and get ready to embark on a journey into the world of correlations and conjectures, where seemingly disparate variables converge in unexpected ways. In this paper, we venture into the peculiar realms of nomenclature and fuel consumption, dissecting the enigmatic association between the first name "Thomas" and the gasoline pumped in France.
This study ventures to answer the question that might have been lurking in the minds of many: "What do the first name Thomas and gasoline consumption in France have in common?" Well, friends, brace yourselves for a "fuel" of surprises because we have uncovered a correlation so striking that it might just leave you "gasping" for more.
But first, let's address the elephant in the room – why did the scientist install a knocker on his door? Because he wanted to win the No-bell prize! Alright, alright, let's refocus our attention on the matter at hand – the Thomas trend and its influence on the gasoline pump-ularity in France.
As we dive into this fascinating exploration, we not only aim to unveil the statistical relationships between "Thomas" and gasoline consumption but also to demonstrate the potential ripple effect of naming conventions on seemingly unrelated aspects of daily life. Are you ready to embark on this whimsical and thought-provoking journey? If so, let's "fuel" up our curiosity and explore the unexpected nuances of this intriguing correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the mystifying connection between the name "Thomas" and the volume of gasoline pumped in France, our research team employed a quirky blend of analytical methods that were as diverse as a full tank of fuel options at a gas station. We harnessed the power of data scraping, trend analysis, and statistical modeling to navigate through this delightful maze of nomenclature and energy consumption. To ensure the robustness of our findings, we meticulously gathered data spanning from 1980 to 2022, aiming for a comprehensive understanding of the evolving dynamics between the popularity of the name "Thomas" and the gasoline demand in France.

In a bid to extract the trend of gasoline consumption in France, we indulged in some data scrapping antics that seem straight out of a heist movie – but rest assured, our intentions were purely academic! We extracted the historical volume of gasoline pumped in France from the Energy Information Administration's treasure trove of information, taking meticulous care to sweep through the data with the finesse of a name detective searching for clues in a mystery novel. Our aim was to map the patterns of gasoline consumption and trace any unexpected trails that might lead us to the doorstep of the enigmatic "Thomas" trend.

Speaking of Thomas, did you hear about the mathematician who’s afraid of negative numbers? He will stop at nothing to avoid them! Now, where were we? Ah, yes, let's shift our focus to the captivating journey we embarked on to unfold the popularity of the name "Thomas." We delved into the annals of the US Social Security Administration's records, skillfully extracting the historical trends of the first name "Thomas." Our data scrapping escapade provided us with a wealth of insights into the ebbs and flows of "Thomas" throughout the years, illuminating the intriguing trajectory of this timeless moniker.

With our arsenal of data at the ready, we embarked on the exhilarating journey of trend analysis. Like detectives following a trail of breadcrumbs, we scrutinized the fluctuations in gasoline consumption alongside the undulating tides of "Thomas" popularity. Through the power of statistical modeling, we sought to quantify the strength of the relationship between these seemingly incongruent variables, teasing apart the intricate dance of names and gas in a way that would even impress a petrol-loving poet.

Into the statistical modeling realm we ventured, armed with a cornucopia of analytical tools suited for uncovering correlations and statistical significance. Our quest was to unearth the hidden gems of connection between "Thomas" and the gasoline pump-ularity in France. With bated breath and penchants for puns, we scrutinized correlation coefficients and p-values, striving to distill the essence of this tantalizing nexus between human names and the liquid gold that fuels our machines.

Our journey through the methodological maze was as twisting and thrilling as a roller coaster ride, navigating the twists and turns of data scrapping, trend analysis, and statistical modeling in our quest to illuminate the interplay between the name "Thomas" and the gasoline consumption in the enchanting land of France.

Well, that's the methodology in a nutshell – or should I say in a fuel tank? As the saying goes, "I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug." All jokes aside, buckle up, because the findings are just around the corner – and they're sure to fuel your imagination!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thomas and Gasoline pumped in France. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1980 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9856517, r-squared of 0.9715093, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Thomas Trend: Exploring the Pump-ularity of Gasoline in France"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name "Thomas" and the volume of gasoline pumped in France. By leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this unconventional relationship, uncovering a surprising connection. Our findings boast a correlation coefficient of 0.9856517, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1980 to 2022.

Amidst our analyses, it became evident that the name "Thomas" holds an uncanny influence on the fuel consumption patterns in France, raising the question, "Are individuals with this moniker driving the demand for gasoline?" It seems that Thomas is not only "tankful" in terms of popularity, but also in driving the fuel economy – talk about a gas-tly impact!

This study sheds light on the whimsical interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated variables and opens a door to contemplating the synergistic interplay between personal nomenclature and energy consumption.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Attention all pun enthusiasts, data aficionados, and curious minds alike! Buckle up and get ready to embark on a journey into the world of correlations and conjectures, where seemingly disparate variables converge in unexpected ways. In this paper, we venture into the peculiar realms of nomenclature and fuel consumption, dissecting the enigmatic association between the first name "Thomas" and the gasoline pumped in France.
This study ventures to answer the question that might have been lurking in the minds of many: "What do the first name Thomas and gasoline consumption in France have in common?" Well, friends, brace yourselves for a "fuel" of surprises because we have uncovered a correlation so striking that it might just leave you "gasping" for more.
But first, let's address the elephant in the room – why did the scientist install a knocker on his door? Because he wanted to win the No-bell prize! Alright, alright, let's refocus our attention on the matter at hand – the Thomas trend and its influence on the gasoline pump-ularity in France.
As we dive into this fascinating exploration, we not only aim to unveil the statistical relationships between "Thomas" and gasoline consumption but also to demonstrate the potential ripple effect of naming conventions on seemingly unrelated aspects of daily life. Are you ready to embark on this whimsical and thought-provoking journey? If so, let's "fuel" up our curiosity and explore the unexpected nuances of this intriguing correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Thomas" and the volume of gasoline pumped in France from 1980 to 2022 left us positively charged! We found a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9856517, with a staggering r-squared value of 0.9715093, and a p-value of less than 0.01. These numbers not only speak to the strength of the association but also leave little room for doubt – this connection is as real as it gets!

Fig. 1, the scatterplot illustrating the relationship between the first name "Thomas" and gasoline consumption in France, paints a clear picture of the striking correlation that left our research team, quite literally, a-gas!

Now, onto the punchline: why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Speaking of making up everything, the "Thomas" effect on gasoline pump-ularity seems to hold true across those 42 years. This raises the question, is there more to this than just a statistical fluke, or are there hidden factors at play? It's pun thing to consider, at the very least!

Our findings suggest that there might indeed be an intriguing connection between the popularity of the name "Thomas" and the gasoline consumption patterns in France – perhaps Thomas the Tank Engine is not just a beloved character from childhood, but a subtle influencer in the realm of energy consumption! This correlation opens a veritable Pandora's box of questions, leaving us pondering the potential impact of personal nomenclature on consumer behaviors.

In conclusion, the results of this study indicate a compelling association between the first name "Thomas" and gasoline pump-ularity in France. These findings not only affirm the presence of an unexpected correlation but also beckon further inquiry into the quirky interplay of personal names and societal trends. So, next time you meet a Thomas, thank them for keeping the gas pumps humming – it seems their name carries more "fuel" than meets the eye!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thomas and Gasoline pumped in France. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Thomas Trend: Exploring the Pump-ularity of Gasoline in France"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name "Thomas" and the volume of gasoline pumped in France. By leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this unconventional relationship, uncovering a surprising connection. Our findings boast a correlation coefficient of 0.9856517, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1980 to 2022.

Amidst our analyses, it became evident that the name "Thomas" holds an uncanny influence on the fuel consumption patterns in France, raising the question, "Are individuals with this moniker driving the demand for gasoline?" It seems that Thomas is not only "tankful" in terms of popularity, but also in driving the fuel economy – talk about a gas-tly impact!

This study sheds light on the whimsical interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated variables and opens a door to contemplating the synergistic interplay between personal nomenclature and energy consumption.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, "The Thomas Effect: A Name to Fuel Connection," Smith and Doe investigated the potential influence of the first name "Thomas" on gasoline consumption patterns. Through an exhaustive analysis of birth records and fuel consumption data, the authors found a curious correlation, sparking widespread interest in the peculiar relationship between personal nomenclature and energy usage. As they delved deeper into their research, they offered a perceptive insight: "Perhaps the Thomas trend extends beyond mere popularity and transcends into the realm of everyday habits, including the demand for gasoline."
Speaking of demand for gasoline, have you heard about the petroleum puns? They're quite fuel-larious!
Jones and Williams further delved into this captivating subject in their article, "Thomas, Throttle, and Tank: Unraveling the Enigma." Their study focused on the socio-economic implications of the Thomas phenomenon, positing that the widespread adoption of this name could potentially sway consumer behaviors, even in the realm of fuel consumption. The authors highlighted, "The Thomas trend may not be a mere coincidence but a compelling factor in shaping energy consumption patterns."
On a related note, have you ever considered why the name Thomas is so common? Because it's a "trains" name, and it keeps "engine"-ering its way into popularity!
Turning to non-fiction literature that converges on the subject matter, "The Energy Dilemma: From Thomas to Transportation" by Emily Smith delves into the intricate interplay between personal identities and energy dynamics. While the book primarily addresses broader environmental concerns, it sparks curiosity about the potential implications of naming trends on specific sectors like transportation and fuel usage.
In the realm of fiction, the novel "Fuelled by Thomas: A Name-Changing Odyssey" by A. C. Diesel presents a whimsical tale of a protagonist named Thomas whose actions mysteriously seem to impact gasoline consumption in a fictionalized version of France - talk about a creative spin on correlating names and fuel!
Furthermore, social media platforms have not been immune to discussions on this captivating correlation. A tweet by @PunnyDriver quipped, "Who would have thought that the name Thomas could have a 'fuelly' impact on French gas stations? Maybe it's time for a statistical study on John and petroleum jelly sales next!"
In conclusion, the literature surrounding the interconnectedness of the first name "Thomas" and gasoline consumption in France encompasses an intriguing blend of scholarly inquiry, light-hearted humor, and unexpected connections. This body of work serves as a testament to the endless wonders of statistical analysis, all while leaving the reader with a chuckle or two along the way.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Thomas" and the volume of gasoline pumped in France from 1980 to 2022 left us positively charged! We found a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9856517, with a staggering r-squared value of 0.9715093, and a p-value of less than 0.01. These numbers not only speak to the strength of the association but also leave little room for doubt – this connection is as real as it gets!
Fig. 1, the scatterplot illustrating the relationship between the first name "Thomas" and gasoline consumption in France, paints a clear picture of the striking correlation that left our research team, quite literally, a-gas!
Now, onto the punchline: why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Speaking of making up everything, the "Thomas" effect on gasoline pump-ularity seems to hold true across those 42 years. This raises the question, is there more to this than just a statistical fluke, or are there hidden factors at play? It's pun thing to consider, at the very least!
Our findings suggest that there might indeed be an intriguing connection between the popularity of the name "Thomas" and the gasoline consumption patterns in France – perhaps Thomas the Tank Engine is not just a beloved character from childhood, but a subtle influencer in the realm of energy consumption! This correlation opens a veritable Pandora's box of questions, leaving us pondering the potential impact of personal nomenclature on consumer behaviors.
In conclusion, the results of this study indicate a compelling association between the first name "Thomas" and gasoline pump-ularity in France. These findings not only affirm the presence of an unexpected correlation but also beckon further inquiry into the quirky interplay of personal names and societal trends. So, next time you meet a Thomas, thank them for keeping the gas pumps humming – it seems their name carries more "fuel" than meets the eye!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study unveils a captivating link between the popularity of the first name "Thomas" and the volume of gasoline pumped in France. The impressive correlation coefficient of 0.9856517, along with a p-value of less than 0.01, aligns with the prior works of Smith and Doe and Jones and Williams, further solidifying the notion that the Thomas effect extends beyond a mere statistical curiosity. This revelation leaves us "fuelin' pumped" about the implications of nomenclature on energy consumption.

The "Thomas" effect appears to hold its grip over the years, leading us to ponder, is it merely a statistical fluke, or is there a deeper connection at play? It's a conundrum akin to the timeless question, "Why can't you give Elsa a balloon? Because she will let it go!" Letting it go is not an option when it comes to unraveling this enigma.

Our findings resonate with the heart of Smith's musings in "The Energy Dilemma: From Thomas to Transportation," as they underscore the interconnectedness of personal identities and energy dynamics. This correlation raises sociological and psychological queries as to whether individual names hold sway over broader societal behavior – or perhaps "Thomas" is indeed the name that keeps the French engines revving!

As we dig deeper into the potential influences of personal nomenclature, we are faced with a "nomenclatural dilemma" – pun intended. Through the comical lens of @PunnyDriver's tweet, we are reminded that the correlation between the first name "Thomas" and gasoline consumption in France is as "fuelly" as they come and invites us to wonder about the unseen forces at play.

In light of these revelations, further research is warranted to delve into the underlying mechanisms behind this unexpected correlation. Future investigations could explore the psychological and behavioral motivations linked to the Thomas effect. Our study leaves us with a lingering "fuelosophical" question – is there something inherently compelling about the name "Thomas" that sways individuals' inclinations, or are we merely scratching the surface of a complex phenomenon?

In conclusion, our findings bolster the prior research on the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Thomas" and gasoline pump-ularity in France. They open doors to a universe of inquiries and underscore the unexpected ways in which seemingly unrelated variables can intertwine. So, here's to the name "Thomas," for keeping the gas flowing and leaving us with a "tankful" of questions to ponder!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Thomas and Gasoline pumped in France. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Thomas Trend: Exploring the Pump-ularity of Gasoline in France"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name "Thomas" and the volume of gasoline pumped in France. By leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this unconventional relationship, uncovering a surprising connection. Our findings boast a correlation coefficient of 0.9856517, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1980 to 2022.

Amidst our analyses, it became evident that the name "Thomas" holds an uncanny influence on the fuel consumption patterns in France, raising the question, "Are individuals with this moniker driving the demand for gasoline?" It seems that Thomas is not only "tankful" in terms of popularity, but also in driving the fuel economy – talk about a gas-tly impact!

This study sheds light on the whimsical interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated variables and opens a door to contemplating the synergistic interplay between personal nomenclature and energy consumption.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Attention all pun enthusiasts, data aficionados, and curious minds alike! Buckle up and get ready to embark on a journey into the world of correlations and conjectures, where seemingly disparate variables converge in unexpected ways. In this paper, we venture into the peculiar realms of nomenclature and fuel consumption, dissecting the enigmatic association between the first name "Thomas" and the gasoline pumped in France.
This study ventures to answer the question that might have been lurking in the minds of many: "What do the first name Thomas and gasoline consumption in France have in common?" Well, friends, brace yourselves for a "fuel" of surprises because we have uncovered a correlation so striking that it might just leave you "gasping" for more.
But first, let's address the elephant in the room – why did the scientist install a knocker on his door? Because he wanted to win the No-bell prize! Alright, alright, let's refocus our attention on the matter at hand – the Thomas trend and its influence on the gasoline pump-ularity in France.
As we dive into this fascinating exploration, we not only aim to unveil the statistical relationships between "Thomas" and gasoline consumption but also to demonstrate the potential ripple effect of naming conventions on seemingly unrelated aspects of daily life. Are you ready to embark on this whimsical and thought-provoking journey? If so, let's "fuel" up our curiosity and explore the unexpected nuances of this intriguing correlation.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Thomas" and the volume of gasoline pumped in France from 1980 to 2022 left us positively charged! We found a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9856517, with a staggering r-squared value of 0.9715093, and a p-value of less than 0.01. These numbers not only speak to the strength of the association but also leave little room for doubt – this connection is as real as it gets!
Fig. 1, the scatterplot illustrating the relationship between the first name "Thomas" and gasoline consumption in France, paints a clear picture of the striking correlation that left our research team, quite literally, a-gas!
Now, onto the punchline: why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Speaking of making up everything, the "Thomas" effect on gasoline pump-ularity seems to hold true across those 42 years. This raises the question, is there more to this than just a statistical fluke, or are there hidden factors at play? It's pun thing to consider, at the very least!
Our findings suggest that there might indeed be an intriguing connection between the popularity of the name "Thomas" and the gasoline consumption patterns in France – perhaps Thomas the Tank Engine is not just a beloved character from childhood, but a subtle influencer in the realm of energy consumption! This correlation opens a veritable Pandora's box of questions, leaving us pondering the potential impact of personal nomenclature on consumer behaviors.
In conclusion, the results of this study indicate a compelling association between the first name "Thomas" and gasoline pump-ularity in France. These findings not only affirm the presence of an unexpected correlation but also beckon further inquiry into the quirky interplay of personal names and societal trends. So, next time you meet a Thomas, thank them for keeping the gas pumps humming – it seems their name carries more "fuel" than meets the eye!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we wrap up this whimsical journey into the serendipitous intersection of nomenclature and fuel consumption, it becomes abundantly clear that the “Thomas” trend is no mere coincidence – it's as real as the gasoline we pump! Our findings not only reveal a substantial correlation between the popularity of the name "Thomas" and the volume of gasoline pumped in France but also incite a wave of contemplation on the unseen influences that permeate our daily lives.

In light of our research, it seems that the next time you meet a Thomas, you ought to thank them for their role in keeping the gas pumps bustling – after all, they may just be fueling more than vehicles with their name! Now, who would have thought that a simple name could hold such "tank"-ular power?

With such definitive results in hand, it's safe to say that no more research is “fuel”-ly needed in this area. The correlation is as clear as day, and the jokes, well, it turns out they might just be "gas"p-worthy after all!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Thomas Trend: Exploring the Pump-ularity of Gasoline in France. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Fuel Fashions


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Thomas Trend: Exploring the Pump-ularity of Gasoline in France. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Petrochemical Research and Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Thomas Trend: Exploring the Pump-ularity of Gasoline in France with an abstract of This paper examines the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name "Thomas" and the volume of gasoline pumped in France. By leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this unconventional relationship, uncovering a surprising connection. Our findings boast a correlation coefficient of 0.9856517, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years spanning from 1980 to 2022.
Amidst our analyses, it became evident that the name "Thomas" holds an uncanny influence on the fuel consumption patterns in France, raising the question, "Are individuals with this moniker driving the demand for gasoline?" It seems that Thomas is not only "tankful" in terms of popularity, but also in driving the fuel economy – talk about a gas-tly impact!
This study sheds light on the whimsical interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated variables and opens a door to contemplating the synergistic interplay between personal nomenclature and energy consumption.

ChatGPT:

"Thomas name popularity France, gasoline consumption correlation, Thomas name statistics, fuel consumption patterns France, Thomas name influence on gas demand, unconventional relationship energy consumption, Thomas popularity fuel economy"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Thomas
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Thomas
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Thomas

Gasoline pumped in France
Detailed data title: Volume of gasoline pumped consumed in France in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Gasoline pumped in France

Correlation r = 0.9856517 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9715093 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 97.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Gasoline pumped in France) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Thomas) over the 43 years from 1980 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0. 0.0000000000000000000000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 0% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated
Warning: Division by zero in /var/www/html/spurious/_CORRELATION_VIEW_PAGE.php on line 636
inf random variables
Warning: Division by zero in /var/www/html/spurious/_CORRELATION_VIEW_PAGE.php on line 638
You don't actually need
Warning: Division by zero in /var/www/html/spurious/_CORRELATION_VIEW_PAGE.php on line 643

Notice: Undefined offset: 10 in /var/www/html/spurious/_CORRELATION_VIEW_PAGE.php on line 572
INF variables to find a correlation like this one.
Warning: Division by zero in /var/www/html/spurious/_CORRELATION_VIEW_PAGE.php on line 643
I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
Warning: Division by zero in /var/www/html/spurious/_CORRELATION_VIEW_PAGE.php on line 646


In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 42 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 42 because we have two variables measured over a period of 43 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.97, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Thomas (Babies born)176801727617700177141771917717174881826118925185061826916830153211489514930141931383412916129041281112662121621130710949105421005095288938836377387143693468616804704472087373718868376651644366766475
Gasoline pumped in France (Million Barrels/Day)413423415422423.077416.852427.918429.14434.713428.055422.06415.142407.306395.805382.359362.882346.658339.134337.101334.901318.396310.167299.411280.54266.134250.997236.436224.773206.934199.214184.91181.775172.12167.288168.748171.175175.137182.704189.523203.364174.025207.449232.54




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([17680,17276,17700,17714,17719,17717,17488,18261,18925,18506,18269,16830,15321,14895,14930,14193,13834,12916,12904,12811,12662,12162,11307,10949,10542,10050,9528,8938,8363,7738,7143,6934,6861,6804,7044,7208,7373,7188,6837,6651,6443,6676,6475,])
array_2 = np.array([413,423,415,422,423.077,416.852,427.918,429.14,434.713,428.055,422.06,415.142,407.306,395.805,382.359,362.882,346.658,339.134,337.101,334.901,318.396,310.167,299.411,280.54,266.134,250.997,236.436,224.773,206.934,199.214,184.91,181.775,172.12,167.288,168.748,171.175,175.137,182.704,189.523,203.364,174.025,207.449,232.54,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Thomas"
array_2_name = "Gasoline pumped in France"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 5024 · Black Variable ID: 2013 · Red Variable ID: 24425
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0