Download png, svg
AI explanation
As we all know, Drenching rain in Perth leads to an increase in the production of boomerangs. This in turn creates a high demand for boomerang-related injuries, which prompts the need for more orderlies in Hawaii to deal with the influx of patients. You could say it's a boomerang effect - the rain in Perth is keeping the healthcare system in Hawaii busy!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a vivid scene where drenching rain falls heavily in Perth. The rain-soaked streets glisten under the downpour as boomerang makers diligently craft intricate boomerangs. Meanwhile, in Hawaii, a line of orderlies attends to patients with boomerang-related injuries, illustrating the ripple effect of the rainy weather in Perth on the healthcare system in Hawaii. The image should capture the intense rainfall, the craftsmanship of the boomerang makers, and the bustling activity of the orderlies tending to patients. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Drenching rain in Perth and The number of orderlies in Hawaii. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Macabre Cyber folk Photorealism Concept art Futuristic
ChatGPT: Drenching rain in Perth: Photorealism
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Drenching rain in Perth and The number of orderlies in Hawaii, in the following situation: As we all know, Drenching rain in Perth leads to an increase in the production of boomerangs. This in turn creates a high demand for boomerang-related injuries, which prompts the need for more orderlies in Hawaii to deal with the influx of patients. You could say it's a boomerang effect - the rain in Perth is keeping the healthcare system in Hawaii busy!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Perth, the rain pours down heavily, drenching the streets while boomerang makers are hard at work producing a large number of boomerangs. Meanwhile, in Hawaii, a line of orderlies is seen busily assisting patients with boomerang-related injuries, showing the impact of the rain in Perth on the healthcare system in Hawaii.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Drenching rain in Perth: Photorealism ] and depicting this scene: In Perth, the rain pours down heavily, drenching the streets while boomerang makers are hard at work producing a large number of boomerangs. Meanwhile, in Hawaii, a line of orderlies is seen busily assisting patients with boomerang-related injuries, showing the impact of the rain in Perth on the healthcare system in Hawaii. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a vivid scene where drenching rain falls heavily in Perth. The rain-soaked streets glisten under the downpour as boomerang makers diligently craft intricate boomerangs. Meanwhile, in Hawaii, a line of orderlies attends to patients with boomerang-related injuries, illustrating the ripple effect of the rainy weather in Perth on the healthcare system in Hawaii. The image should capture the intense rainfall, the craftsmanship of the boomerang makers, and the bustling activity of the orderlies tending to patients.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Drenching rain in Perth positively influenced The number of orderlies in Hawaii. Include one good pun.
AI academic paper
A Pacific Connection: From Drenched in Rain to Ordering in Hawaii Journal of Tropical Ethnobotany and Cultural Studies Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Drenching rain in Perth and The number of orderlies in Hawaii. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from NOAA National Climate Data Center and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8044937 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
A Pacific Connection: From Drenched in Rain to Ordering in Hawaii
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing connection between drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii, aiming to shed light on this unexpected correlation and to bring a bit of levity to the world of statistical research. Leveraging data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our study covers the years 2012 to 2022. Applying advanced statistical analysis, we found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8044937 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The implications of this quirky correlation may have a ripple effect, spurring further investigation into the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate variables and offering a lighthearted approach to statistical analysis.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Drenching rain in Perth and The number of orderlies in Hawaii. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Pacific Connection: From Drenched in Rain to Ordering in Hawaii
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing connection between drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii, aiming to shed light on this unexpected correlation and to bring a bit of levity to the world of statistical research. Leveraging data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our study covers the years 2012 to 2022. Applying advanced statistical analysis, we found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8044937 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The implications of this quirky correlation may have a ripple effect, spurring further investigation into the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate variables and offering a lighthearted approach to statistical analysis.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
Introduction
Uncovering unexpected correlations in the world of statistical research is akin to stumbling upon a hidden treasure chest buried beneath layers of mundane data. Delving into the depths of interconnected variables often yields fascinating insights and surprises, challenging our perceptions of cause and effect. In this spirit of adventurous inquiry, we embark on a whimsical journey to explore the curious link between drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii.
While the connection between rain and healthcare staffing may sound like the setup for a particularly esoteric joke, our investigation into this unorthodox pairing aims to inject some levity into the otherwise serious realm of statistical analysis. Armed with a wealth of data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, spanning the years 2012 to 2022, we set out to untangle the web of relationships between these seemingly disparate phenomena.
As we wade through the data, we cannot help but marvel at the peculiarities that emerge from the statistical fabric. The allure of uncovering a correlation that is as unexpected as finding a pineapple on a pizza cannot be overstated. And so, armed with a cheeky sense of humor and an arsenal of statistical tools, we embark on this investigation with an open mind and a hearty dose of scientific curiosity.
In this zany escapade into the realms of data, we aim to offer a fresh perspective on the often dry and technical world of statistical analysis. By infusing a touch of whimsy into our exploration, we hope to inspire further investigations into the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated variables, all the while reminding ourselves to embrace the unexpected in the world of research.
So grab your scientific umbrellas and prepare for a downpour of statistical insights as we unravel the Pacific connection between drenching rain and ordering in Hawaii, bringing a splash of humor to the often serious pursuit of knowledge.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Drenching rain in Perth and The number of orderlies in Hawaii. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Pacific Connection: From Drenched in Rain to Ordering in Hawaii
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing connection between drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii, aiming to shed light on this unexpected correlation and to bring a bit of levity to the world of statistical research. Leveraging data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our study covers the years 2012 to 2022. Applying advanced statistical analysis, we found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8044937 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The implications of this quirky correlation may have a ripple effect, spurring further investigation into the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate variables and offering a lighthearted approach to statistical analysis.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
Uncovering unexpected correlations in the world of statistical research is akin to stumbling upon a hidden treasure chest buried beneath layers of mundane data. Delving into the depths of interconnected variables often yields fascinating insights and surprises, challenging our perceptions of cause and effect. In this spirit of adventurous inquiry, we embark on a whimsical journey to explore the curious link between drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii.
While the connection between rain and healthcare staffing may sound like the setup for a particularly esoteric joke, our investigation into this unorthodox pairing aims to inject some levity into the otherwise serious realm of statistical analysis. Armed with a wealth of data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, spanning the years 2012 to 2022, we set out to untangle the web of relationships between these seemingly disparate phenomena.
As we wade through the data, we cannot help but marvel at the peculiarities that emerge from the statistical fabric. The allure of uncovering a correlation that is as unexpected as finding a pineapple on a pizza cannot be overstated. And so, armed with a cheeky sense of humor and an arsenal of statistical tools, we embark on this investigation with an open mind and a hearty dose of scientific curiosity.
In this zany escapade into the realms of data, we aim to offer a fresh perspective on the often dry and technical world of statistical analysis. By infusing a touch of whimsy into our exploration, we hope to inspire further investigations into the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated variables, all the while reminding ourselves to embrace the unexpected in the world of research.
So grab your scientific umbrellas and prepare for a downpour of statistical insights as we unravel the Pacific connection between drenching rain and ordering in Hawaii, bringing a splash of humor to the often serious pursuit of knowledge.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the pursuit of understanding the confounding conundrum of the correlation between drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii, researchers have delved into a myriad of studies and sources to comprehend this befuddling association. The authors find a wealth of scholarly articles and statistical analyses documenting the intersection of weather patterns and labor statistics, paving the way for our own foray into this comically perplexing domain.
In "Rainfall and Employment Trends: An Unlikely Affair" by Smith et al., the authors unearth a curious juxtaposition between precipitation levels and employment figures, wherein they posit a connection as enigmatic as discovering a kangaroo on a surfing board. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones extol the synergy between atmospheric conditions and workforce dynamics in "The Strategic Impact of Rainfall on Labor Markets," shedding light on the underexplored realm of meteorologically influenced job trends.
Venturing into the realm of non-fiction literature, works such as "Weathering the Workforce: The Role of Rain in Employment" by Weatherman and "Staffing Storms: A Statistical Analysis of Rainfall and Labor" by Laborious also contribute to the fray. These publications provide valuable insights into the interplay of weather phenomena and labor metrics, albeit without a hint of the whimsy and verve that our current endeavor seeks to infuse.
Moving beyond the rigid confines of academic literature, the world of fiction offers its own peculiar parallels to our inquiry. "Cloudy with a Chance of Paychecks" by Forecast showcases a whimsical tale of meteorological mischief impacting the careers of characters in a rain-soaked town, offering a lighthearted glimpse into the potential ramifications of copious precipitation on employment prospects. Similarly, "The Umbrella Conspiracy: A Labor of Rain" by Raintale weaves a narrative web of intrigue and enigma around the intricate relationship between rainfall and the labor force, albeit in a decidedly more fictional and fantastical setting.
As we navigate the curious intersection of rain and work, it is imperative to acknowledge the less orthodox sources that have contributed to our understanding of this peculiar domain. Animated shows such as "The Rainy Adventures of Drizzly Dan" and "The Orderlies of Oahu: Weathering the Storm" may not wield the academic rigor of scholarly articles, but they offer a whimsical and often fantastical take on the interwoven tapestry of inclement weather and labor dynamics.
In this lighthearted pursuit of correlation amidst the flurries of statistical analysis, it becomes abundantly clear that the world of research is as ripe with humor as it is with data. With this medley of scholarly, fictional, and fantastical resources as our guide, we embark on our own expedition to untangle the wondrous enigma of drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii, aiming to infuse a dash of levity into the often somber landscape of statistical exploration.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Drenching rain in Perth and The number of orderlies in Hawaii. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from NOAA National Climate Data Center and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Pacific Connection: From Drenched in Rain to Ordering in Hawaii
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing connection between drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii, aiming to shed light on this unexpected correlation and to bring a bit of levity to the world of statistical research. Leveraging data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our study covers the years 2012 to 2022. Applying advanced statistical analysis, we found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8044937 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The implications of this quirky correlation may have a ripple effect, spurring further investigation into the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate variables and offering a lighthearted approach to statistical analysis.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
Uncovering unexpected correlations in the world of statistical research is akin to stumbling upon a hidden treasure chest buried beneath layers of mundane data. Delving into the depths of interconnected variables often yields fascinating insights and surprises, challenging our perceptions of cause and effect. In this spirit of adventurous inquiry, we embark on a whimsical journey to explore the curious link between drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii.
While the connection between rain and healthcare staffing may sound like the setup for a particularly esoteric joke, our investigation into this unorthodox pairing aims to inject some levity into the otherwise serious realm of statistical analysis. Armed with a wealth of data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, spanning the years 2012 to 2022, we set out to untangle the web of relationships between these seemingly disparate phenomena.
As we wade through the data, we cannot help but marvel at the peculiarities that emerge from the statistical fabric. The allure of uncovering a correlation that is as unexpected as finding a pineapple on a pizza cannot be overstated. And so, armed with a cheeky sense of humor and an arsenal of statistical tools, we embark on this investigation with an open mind and a hearty dose of scientific curiosity.
In this zany escapade into the realms of data, we aim to offer a fresh perspective on the often dry and technical world of statistical analysis. By infusing a touch of whimsy into our exploration, we hope to inspire further investigations into the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated variables, all the while reminding ourselves to embrace the unexpected in the world of research.
So grab your scientific umbrellas and prepare for a downpour of statistical insights as we unravel the Pacific connection between drenching rain and ordering in Hawaii, bringing a splash of humor to the often serious pursuit of knowledge.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In order to unravel the perplexing connection between drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii, our research team embarked on a data-driven odyssey that would make even the most intrepid explorers of statistical analysis do a double take. We harnessed the powers of the NOAA National Climate Data Center and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to acquire a treasure trove of data spanning the years 2012 to 2022. With the precision of a skilled puzzle master piecing together a jigsaw, we meticulously assembled and scrutinized this data to unlock the enigmatic relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables.
Data Collection
Our quest began with the meticulous collection of rainfall data from the ever-reliable archives of the NOAA National Climate Data Center. Navigating through a deluge of precipitation records, we accumulated a comprehensive dataset detailing the frequency and intensity of drenching rain in Perth over the specified timeframe. As we combed through this watery labyrinth of information, we remained mindful of the fluctuations and nuances of rain patterns that could potentially sway the outcomes of our investigation.
Simultaneously, we ventured into the labyrinthine corridors of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, armed with an insatiable curiosity to unearth the employment trends of orderlies in the vibrant archipelago of Hawaii. Through the cunning use of statistical sorcery – otherwise known as rigorous data extraction methods – we harvested a rich dataset documenting the ebbs and flows of orderly employment, encapsulating the peculiar interplay of demand for healthcare staffing in the island paradise.
Data Analysis
With our reservoirs of data teeming with rainfall and employment statistics, we harnessed the computational powers of modern statistical techniques to untangle the mystifying web of correlation. Armed with the mystical wand of correlation coefficients and the scepter of p-values, we cast the spell of analysis upon the data, determined to unveil the enchanting connection between rain and healthcare staffing.
Employing advanced statistical software, we performed a captivating dance of regression analysis, letting the variables whirl and twirl in the intricate choreography of mathematical modeling. With each step of the analysis, we took care to account for potential confounding factors that could cloud the transparency of our findings, ensuring that our conclusions would stand firm against the tempestuous winds of doubt.
The unexpected emerged from the statistical cauldron as we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8044937 and a p-value that gleamed brightly, shining with significance at less than 0.01. The robustness of this correlation sent ripples of bemusement through our team, prompting spirited discussions about the whimsical ways in which the universe orchestrates its statistical symphony.
Through these statistical incantations, we sought to offer a lighthearted approach to uncovering correlations and to emphasize the importance of approaching research with a playful spirit of inquiry. This journey through the statistical cosmos of rainfall and employment trends has not only shed light on an unexpected relationship but has also breathed a bit of whimsy into the often somber world of data analysis.
In the pursuit of unraveling the Pacific connection between drenching rain and ordering in Hawaii, our methodology danced on the precipice of statistical probability, embracing the delightful intricacies of unexpected correlations and reminding us to always expect the unexpected in the ardent pursuit of knowledge.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Drenching rain in Perth and The number of orderlies in Hawaii. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from NOAA National Climate Data Center and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .
For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8044937, r-squared of 0.6472102, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Pacific Connection: From Drenched in Rain to Ordering in Hawaii
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing connection between drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii, aiming to shed light on this unexpected correlation and to bring a bit of levity to the world of statistical research. Leveraging data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our study covers the years 2012 to 2022. Applying advanced statistical analysis, we found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8044937 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The implications of this quirky correlation may have a ripple effect, spurring further investigation into the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate variables and offering a lighthearted approach to statistical analysis.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
Uncovering unexpected correlations in the world of statistical research is akin to stumbling upon a hidden treasure chest buried beneath layers of mundane data. Delving into the depths of interconnected variables often yields fascinating insights and surprises, challenging our perceptions of cause and effect. In this spirit of adventurous inquiry, we embark on a whimsical journey to explore the curious link between drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii.
While the connection between rain and healthcare staffing may sound like the setup for a particularly esoteric joke, our investigation into this unorthodox pairing aims to inject some levity into the otherwise serious realm of statistical analysis. Armed with a wealth of data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, spanning the years 2012 to 2022, we set out to untangle the web of relationships between these seemingly disparate phenomena.
As we wade through the data, we cannot help but marvel at the peculiarities that emerge from the statistical fabric. The allure of uncovering a correlation that is as unexpected as finding a pineapple on a pizza cannot be overstated. And so, armed with a cheeky sense of humor and an arsenal of statistical tools, we embark on this investigation with an open mind and a hearty dose of scientific curiosity.
In this zany escapade into the realms of data, we aim to offer a fresh perspective on the often dry and technical world of statistical analysis. By infusing a touch of whimsy into our exploration, we hope to inspire further investigations into the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated variables, all the while reminding ourselves to embrace the unexpected in the world of research.
So grab your scientific umbrellas and prepare for a downpour of statistical insights as we unravel the Pacific connection between drenching rain and ordering in Hawaii, bringing a splash of humor to the often serious pursuit of knowledge.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a rather remarkable and somewhat quirky relationship between the amount of drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii. We certainly did not expect to find such a strong correlation, but as the saying goes, "when it rains, it pours" — both in terms of weather and statistical surprises!
Our calculated correlation coefficient of 0.8044937 suggests a robust association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. This indicates a positively strong linear relationship between the amount of drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii. It seems that as the heavens open up in Australia, the need for orderlies in Hawaii rises, perhaps due to an influx of patients seeking shelter from the storm or a surge in slip-and-fall incidents.
The substantial r-squared value of 0.6472102 further reinforces the strength of this correlation, explaining a large proportion of the variability in the number of orderlies based on the drenching rain in Perth. It's as if the rain in Australia is sending a wave of causal influence across the ocean, impacting the demand for healthcare support in Hawaii. Who would have thought that precipitation could have such far-reaching effects on the healthcare sector?
With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently conclude that this correlation is not the product of mere chance. The odds of this unusual relationship occurring by random variability alone are slim to none, further solidifying the evidence of a genuine connection between these meteorological and labor market phenomena.
For a visual representation of this unexpected link, please refer to Figure 1, which provides a scatterplot illustrating the remarkably strong correlation between drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii. It's a graph that truly encapsulates the idea that sometimes, in the curious world of statistics, you have to weather the storm to uncover the most surprising relationships.
In summary, our findings highlight an intriguing and, dare we say, amusing association between drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii. This delightful discovery serves as a reminder that in the realm of statistical research, one must always expect the unexpected and be prepared for the occasional statistical downpour.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Drenching rain in Perth and The number of orderlies in Hawaii. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
A Pacific Connection: From Drenched in Rain to Ordering in Hawaii
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing connection between drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii, aiming to shed light on this unexpected correlation and to bring a bit of levity to the world of statistical research. Leveraging data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our study covers the years 2012 to 2022. Applying advanced statistical analysis, we found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8044937 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The implications of this quirky correlation may have a ripple effect, spurring further investigation into the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate variables and offering a lighthearted approach to statistical analysis.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the pursuit of understanding the confounding conundrum of the correlation between drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii, researchers have delved into a myriad of studies and sources to comprehend this befuddling association. The authors find a wealth of scholarly articles and statistical analyses documenting the intersection of weather patterns and labor statistics, paving the way for our own foray into this comically perplexing domain.
In "Rainfall and Employment Trends: An Unlikely Affair" by Smith et al., the authors unearth a curious juxtaposition between precipitation levels and employment figures, wherein they posit a connection as enigmatic as discovering a kangaroo on a surfing board. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones extol the synergy between atmospheric conditions and workforce dynamics in "The Strategic Impact of Rainfall on Labor Markets," shedding light on the underexplored realm of meteorologically influenced job trends.
Venturing into the realm of non-fiction literature, works such as "Weathering the Workforce: The Role of Rain in Employment" by Weatherman and "Staffing Storms: A Statistical Analysis of Rainfall and Labor" by Laborious also contribute to the fray. These publications provide valuable insights into the interplay of weather phenomena and labor metrics, albeit without a hint of the whimsy and verve that our current endeavor seeks to infuse.
Moving beyond the rigid confines of academic literature, the world of fiction offers its own peculiar parallels to our inquiry. "Cloudy with a Chance of Paychecks" by Forecast showcases a whimsical tale of meteorological mischief impacting the careers of characters in a rain-soaked town, offering a lighthearted glimpse into the potential ramifications of copious precipitation on employment prospects. Similarly, "The Umbrella Conspiracy: A Labor of Rain" by Raintale weaves a narrative web of intrigue and enigma around the intricate relationship between rainfall and the labor force, albeit in a decidedly more fictional and fantastical setting.
As we navigate the curious intersection of rain and work, it is imperative to acknowledge the less orthodox sources that have contributed to our understanding of this peculiar domain. Animated shows such as "The Rainy Adventures of Drizzly Dan" and "The Orderlies of Oahu: Weathering the Storm" may not wield the academic rigor of scholarly articles, but they offer a whimsical and often fantastical take on the interwoven tapestry of inclement weather and labor dynamics.
In this lighthearted pursuit of correlation amidst the flurries of statistical analysis, it becomes abundantly clear that the world of research is as ripe with humor as it is with data. With this medley of scholarly, fictional, and fantastical resources as our guide, we embark on our own expedition to untangle the wondrous enigma of drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii, aiming to infuse a dash of levity into the often somber landscape of statistical exploration.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a rather remarkable and somewhat quirky relationship between the amount of drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii. We certainly did not expect to find such a strong correlation, but as the saying goes, "when it rains, it pours" — both in terms of weather and statistical surprises!
Our calculated correlation coefficient of 0.8044937 suggests a robust association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. This indicates a positively strong linear relationship between the amount of drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii. It seems that as the heavens open up in Australia, the need for orderlies in Hawaii rises, perhaps due to an influx of patients seeking shelter from the storm or a surge in slip-and-fall incidents.
The substantial r-squared value of 0.6472102 further reinforces the strength of this correlation, explaining a large proportion of the variability in the number of orderlies based on the drenching rain in Perth. It's as if the rain in Australia is sending a wave of causal influence across the ocean, impacting the demand for healthcare support in Hawaii. Who would have thought that precipitation could have such far-reaching effects on the healthcare sector?
With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently conclude that this correlation is not the product of mere chance. The odds of this unusual relationship occurring by random variability alone are slim to none, further solidifying the evidence of a genuine connection between these meteorological and labor market phenomena.
For a visual representation of this unexpected link, please refer to Figure 1, which provides a scatterplot illustrating the remarkably strong correlation between drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii. It's a graph that truly encapsulates the idea that sometimes, in the curious world of statistics, you have to weather the storm to uncover the most surprising relationships.
In summary, our findings highlight an intriguing and, dare we say, amusing association between drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii. This delightful discovery serves as a reminder that in the realm of statistical research, one must always expect the unexpected and be prepared for the occasional statistical downpour.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Our study has uncovered a connection between drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii that is more intriguing than watching a crab do the hula. Our findings have not only confirmed, but also enlivened the prior research exploring the wacky world of weather and work.
First, let's address the elephant in the room – or should we say, the kangaroo in the storm? Our results echo the sentiments of Smith et al., who proposed a mysterious link between precipitation levels and employment figures. Much like a sudden downpour, our correlation coefficient of 0.8044937 hit us with the force of a statistical thunderbolt, corroborating the substantial relationship they pondered.
Doe and Jones, in their musings on the strategic impact of rainfall on labor markets, must be pleasantly surprised by our findings. The wave of causal influence we observed, with the drenching rain in Perth seemingly affecting the demand for healthcare support in Hawaii, aligns with their speculations on atmospheric conditions shaping workforce dynamics. It's as if the rain isn't just falling, but also making some career decisions along the way!
Our results also lend weight to the insights from non-fiction literature, specifically those of Weatherman and Laborious. The substantial r-squared value of 0.6472102 elucidates a large proportion of the variability in the number of orderlies based on the drenching rain in Perth, akin to the meticulous analyses presented in these scholarly works. Who knew that deluges in Australia could have such a far-reaching impact, akin to a weather system that doesn't abide by international borders?
It's not just scholarly literature that's getting a nod from our findings; the fictional works "Cloudy with a Chance of Paychecks" and "The Umbrella Conspiracy: A Labor of Rain" have inadvertently found echoes in our results. The whimsical narrative of meteorological mischief impacting the careers of characters in a rain-soaked town no longer seems entirely far-fetched. Our study brings a twinkle of empirical evidence to the otherwise fantastical notion of inclement weather influencing employment prospects.
The scatterplot in Figure 1 paints a picture that would make even a statistician chuckle. The strong linear relationship it illustrates between drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii is as clear as a sunny day in the tropics. It seems that sometimes, it takes a statistical downpour to reveal the most surprising correlations, much like a sudden burst of insight during a brainstorming session.
In the lighthearted pursuit of correlation amidst the flurries of statistical analysis, our study has flung open the doors to the comedic potential of statistical exploration. Our findings underscore the idea that even in the most unexpected places, such as the realm of weather and workforce dynamics, statistical surprises await. With this quirky correlation in hand, we look forward to seeing how further investigations into seemingly unrelated variables can shine a statistical spotlight on the unexpected and add a burst of humor to the often serious world of research.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Drenching rain in Perth and The number of orderlies in Hawaii. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
A Pacific Connection: From Drenched in Rain to Ordering in Hawaii
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the intriguing connection between drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii, aiming to shed light on this unexpected correlation and to bring a bit of levity to the world of statistical research. Leveraging data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our study covers the years 2012 to 2022. Applying advanced statistical analysis, we found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8044937 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The implications of this quirky correlation may have a ripple effect, spurring further investigation into the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate variables and offering a lighthearted approach to statistical analysis.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
Uncovering unexpected correlations in the world of statistical research is akin to stumbling upon a hidden treasure chest buried beneath layers of mundane data. Delving into the depths of interconnected variables often yields fascinating insights and surprises, challenging our perceptions of cause and effect. In this spirit of adventurous inquiry, we embark on a whimsical journey to explore the curious link between drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii.
While the connection between rain and healthcare staffing may sound like the setup for a particularly esoteric joke, our investigation into this unorthodox pairing aims to inject some levity into the otherwise serious realm of statistical analysis. Armed with a wealth of data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, spanning the years 2012 to 2022, we set out to untangle the web of relationships between these seemingly disparate phenomena.
As we wade through the data, we cannot help but marvel at the peculiarities that emerge from the statistical fabric. The allure of uncovering a correlation that is as unexpected as finding a pineapple on a pizza cannot be overstated. And so, armed with a cheeky sense of humor and an arsenal of statistical tools, we embark on this investigation with an open mind and a hearty dose of scientific curiosity.
In this zany escapade into the realms of data, we aim to offer a fresh perspective on the often dry and technical world of statistical analysis. By infusing a touch of whimsy into our exploration, we hope to inspire further investigations into the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated variables, all the while reminding ourselves to embrace the unexpected in the world of research.
So grab your scientific umbrellas and prepare for a downpour of statistical insights as we unravel the Pacific connection between drenching rain and ordering in Hawaii, bringing a splash of humor to the often serious pursuit of knowledge.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a rather remarkable and somewhat quirky relationship between the amount of drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii. We certainly did not expect to find such a strong correlation, but as the saying goes, "when it rains, it pours" — both in terms of weather and statistical surprises!
Our calculated correlation coefficient of 0.8044937 suggests a robust association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. This indicates a positively strong linear relationship between the amount of drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii. It seems that as the heavens open up in Australia, the need for orderlies in Hawaii rises, perhaps due to an influx of patients seeking shelter from the storm or a surge in slip-and-fall incidents.
The substantial r-squared value of 0.6472102 further reinforces the strength of this correlation, explaining a large proportion of the variability in the number of orderlies based on the drenching rain in Perth. It's as if the rain in Australia is sending a wave of causal influence across the ocean, impacting the demand for healthcare support in Hawaii. Who would have thought that precipitation could have such far-reaching effects on the healthcare sector?
With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently conclude that this correlation is not the product of mere chance. The odds of this unusual relationship occurring by random variability alone are slim to none, further solidifying the evidence of a genuine connection between these meteorological and labor market phenomena.
For a visual representation of this unexpected link, please refer to Figure 1, which provides a scatterplot illustrating the remarkably strong correlation between drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii. It's a graph that truly encapsulates the idea that sometimes, in the curious world of statistics, you have to weather the storm to uncover the most surprising relationships.
In summary, our findings highlight an intriguing and, dare we say, amusing association between drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii. This delightful discovery serves as a reminder that in the realm of statistical research, one must always expect the unexpected and be prepared for the occasional statistical downpour.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our study has not only unearthed an unexpectedly strong correlation between drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii but also drenched the realm of statistical analysis with a splash of whimsy. As we reflect on the journey of unraveling this quirky Pacific connection, it's clear that sometimes statistical research can be as unpredictable as the weather!
Who would have thought that a downpour in Perth could ripple across the Pacific Ocean and influence healthcare staffing in Hawaii? It seems that when it rains, it pours statistical surprises, much like the unexpected discovery of a particularly soggy statistician in the midst of a data deluge.
The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8044937 and the substantial r-squared value of 0.6472102 paint a vivid picture of the profound relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's almost as if Mother Nature and the labor market have orchestrated a delightfully intricate dance, choreographed with raindrops and orderly shuffles.
Our findings not only showcase the quirky interconnectedness of the world but also remind us that sometimes statistical exploration can be as refreshing as a summer shower. We hope that this study will inspire further investigations into the delightful, unexpected, and outright comical relationships that may lurk within the depths of data.
In the spirit of scientific inquiry and statistical amusement, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, as we have drenched the topic thoroughly and unearthed a correlation that is as clear as a sunny day after a storm. It's time to dry off our statistical raincoats and bask in the glow of this peculiar yet delightful discovery. After all, sometimes the most unconventional correlations can bring a flood of insight and amusement to the world of research.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited A Pacific Connection: From Drenched in Rain to Ordering in Hawaii. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
Journal of Tropical Ethnobotany and Cultural Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited A Pacific Connection: From Drenched in Rain to Ordering in Hawaii. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Tropical Studies and Island Cultures
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled A Pacific Connection: From Drenched in Rain to Ordering in Hawaii with an abstract of This paper investigates the intriguing connection between drenching rain in Perth and the number of orderlies in Hawaii, aiming to shed light on this unexpected correlation and to bring a bit of levity to the world of statistical research. Leveraging data from the NOAA National Climate Data Center and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our study covers the years 2012 to 2022. Applying advanced statistical analysis, we found a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8044937 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The implications of this quirky correlation may have a ripple effect, spurring further investigation into the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate variables and offering a lighthearted approach to statistical analysis.
ChatGPT:
drenching rain, Perth, Hawaii, orderlies, correlation, statistical analysis, NOAA National Climate Data Center, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, p-value, interconnected variables
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Drenching rain in PerthDetailed data title: Highest daily total of precipitation in the year at PERTH AIRPORT, AS
Source: NOAA National Climate Data Center
See what else correlates with Drenching rain in Perth
The number of orderlies in Hawaii
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of orderlies in Hawaii
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of orderlies in Hawaii
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.6472102 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 64.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of orderlies in Hawaii) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Drenching rain in Perth) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0028. 0.0028276356510076235000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.8 in 0.28% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 354 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.4, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
Drenching rain in Perth (Inches of rain) | 1.27 | 1.68 | 1.86 | 1.57 | 1.44 | 2.94 | 3.55 | 1.72 | 1.81 | 2.2 | 1.25 |
The number of orderlies in Hawaii (Orderlies) | 60 | 70 | 60 | 70 | 80 | 170 | 190 | 160 | 90 | 90 | 80 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1.27,1.68,1.86,1.57,1.44,2.94,3.55,1.72,1.81,2.2,1.25,])
array_2 = np.array([60,70,60,70,80,170,190,160,90,90,80,])
array_1_name = "Drenching rain in Perth"
array_2_name = "The number of orderlies in Hawaii"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Drenching rain in Perth
- Line chart for only The number of orderlies in Hawaii
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: A Pacific Connection: From Drenched in Rain to Ordering in Hawaii
I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!
Correlation ID: 5016 · Black Variable ID: 25378 · Red Variable ID: 19018