AI explanation
As the 'thanks Obama' meme gained popularity, it sparked a wave of sarcastic gratitude. This outpouring of thanks inadvertently led to an increase in the production of salt, a key component in preserving food. This surplus of preserved food prompted a higher demand for special education teachers in Utah, as the state experienced a boom in pickle-related behavioral incidents.Create a meme inspired by the thanks obama meme that in some way references The number of special education teachers in Utah. Try to emulate the style of the meme - don’t violate the copyright, just make it look and feel like the original meme.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Popularity of the 'thanks obama' meme positively influenced The number of special education teachers in Utah. Make it feel plausible.
AI academic paper
Trendy Memes and Education schemes: Exploring the Relationship between 'Thanks Obama' Popularity and Special Education Teacher Numbers in Utah The Journal of Memetic Studies Jan 2024 |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'thanks obama' meme and The number of special education teachers in Utah. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Rhyme words in the title.
Your research team used data from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9493559 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Trendy Memes and Education schemes: Exploring the Relationship between 'Thanks Obama' Popularity and Special Education Teacher Numbers in Utah
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a statistical investigation into the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the 'thanks Obama' meme and the employment figures of special education teachers in the state of Utah. By utilizing data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we assessed the connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9493559 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2012 to 2022. We discuss the potential implications of this unusual relationship, as well as the possible mechanisms at play. This study sheds light on the intricate and often surprising interplay between internet culture and labor market dynamics, leaving us pondering the profound question: "Is it all just an Obama-nation of coincidence?"
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'thanks obama' meme and The number of special education teachers in Utah. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Trendy Memes and Education schemes: Exploring the Relationship between 'Thanks Obama' Popularity and Special Education Teacher Numbers in Utah
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a statistical investigation into the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the 'thanks Obama' meme and the employment figures of special education teachers in the state of Utah. By utilizing data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we assessed the connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9493559 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2012 to 2022. We discuss the potential implications of this unusual relationship, as well as the possible mechanisms at play. This study sheds light on the intricate and often surprising interplay between internet culture and labor market dynamics, leaving us pondering the profound question: "Is it all just an Obama-nation of coincidence?"
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the vast and ever-evolving landscape of internet memes, the 'thanks Obama' phenomenon stands as a testament to the enduring legacy of a political catchphrase. Originating during President Barack Obama's tenure, this meme took on a life of its own, serving as a humorous scapegoat for any and all inconveniences, perplexities, and disappointments encountered in daily life. Its pervasive presence in online discourse and social media platforms has made it a cultural touchstone, evoke chuckles, eye rolls, and the occasional existential crisis. Yet, amidst the sea of internet frivolity, who would have thought that this comedic rallying cry would spark a statistical conundrum with far-reaching implications for the field of education?
Simultaneously, within the realm of educational policy and workforce dynamics, the provision of special education services in the state of Utah has long been an area of interest and concern. The responsibilities of special education teachers encompass an array of deeply meaningful endeavors, from fostering inclusive learning environments to individualized educational programs and personal breakthroughs. Yet, the fluctuating numbers and staffing challenges in this specialized sector persist as an ongoing puzzle. Little did we anticipate that a lighthearted meme and the noble yet demanding profession of special education would find themselves entangled in a statistical tango of correlations and coefficients.
This research endeavor arises from the curious intersection of these divergent domains, aiming to unravel the perplexing relationship between the meteoric rise of the 'thanks Obama' meme and the employment figures of special education teachers in the scenic expanse of the Beehive State. By diving into the depths of data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embark on a journey to decipher the enigmatic dance of these seemingly disparate variables. As we traverse this analytical odyssey, we cannot help but marvel at the unexpectedness of our discoveries, leaving us to wonder if there may be more than meets the eye in this intricate interplay of internet fervor and pedagogical workforce dynamics.
Indulging in statistical inquiry, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in uncovering the hidden synapses of correlation, causation, and coincidence. With a dash of humor, a sprinkle of skepticism, and a dollop of statistical rigor, we set sail on this peculiar voyage of discovery, pausing only to ponder: Could it be that amidst the sea of 'thanks Obama' memes lie the currents of educational staffing dynamics, or are we merely navigating an Obama-nation of statistical whimsy?
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'thanks obama' meme and The number of special education teachers in Utah. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Trendy Memes and Education schemes: Exploring the Relationship between 'Thanks Obama' Popularity and Special Education Teacher Numbers in Utah
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a statistical investigation into the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the 'thanks Obama' meme and the employment figures of special education teachers in the state of Utah. By utilizing data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we assessed the connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9493559 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2012 to 2022. We discuss the potential implications of this unusual relationship, as well as the possible mechanisms at play. This study sheds light on the intricate and often surprising interplay between internet culture and labor market dynamics, leaving us pondering the profound question: "Is it all just an Obama-nation of coincidence?"
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the vast and ever-evolving landscape of internet memes, the 'thanks Obama' phenomenon stands as a testament to the enduring legacy of a political catchphrase. Originating during President Barack Obama's tenure, this meme took on a life of its own, serving as a humorous scapegoat for any and all inconveniences, perplexities, and disappointments encountered in daily life. Its pervasive presence in online discourse and social media platforms has made it a cultural touchstone, evoke chuckles, eye rolls, and the occasional existential crisis. Yet, amidst the sea of internet frivolity, who would have thought that this comedic rallying cry would spark a statistical conundrum with far-reaching implications for the field of education?
Simultaneously, within the realm of educational policy and workforce dynamics, the provision of special education services in the state of Utah has long been an area of interest and concern. The responsibilities of special education teachers encompass an array of deeply meaningful endeavors, from fostering inclusive learning environments to individualized educational programs and personal breakthroughs. Yet, the fluctuating numbers and staffing challenges in this specialized sector persist as an ongoing puzzle. Little did we anticipate that a lighthearted meme and the noble yet demanding profession of special education would find themselves entangled in a statistical tango of correlations and coefficients.
This research endeavor arises from the curious intersection of these divergent domains, aiming to unravel the perplexing relationship between the meteoric rise of the 'thanks Obama' meme and the employment figures of special education teachers in the scenic expanse of the Beehive State. By diving into the depths of data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embark on a journey to decipher the enigmatic dance of these seemingly disparate variables. As we traverse this analytical odyssey, we cannot help but marvel at the unexpectedness of our discoveries, leaving us to wonder if there may be more than meets the eye in this intricate interplay of internet fervor and pedagogical workforce dynamics.
Indulging in statistical inquiry, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in uncovering the hidden synapses of correlation, causation, and coincidence. With a dash of humor, a sprinkle of skepticism, and a dollop of statistical rigor, we set sail on this peculiar voyage of discovery, pausing only to ponder: Could it be that amidst the sea of 'thanks Obama' memes lie the currents of educational staffing dynamics, or are we merely navigating an Obama-nation of statistical whimsy?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The preceding discussion has highlighted the unprecedented convergence of disparate realms, from the expanse of internet humor to the intricacies of educational workforce dynamics. As we endeavor to decipher the enigmatic relationship between the meteoric rise of the 'thanks Obama' meme and the employment figures of special education teachers in Utah, we turn to the existing literature for insights, elucidation, and the occasional chuckle.
Smith et al. conducted a comprehensive study on internet memes and their social impact, delving into the cultural significance of digital humor in shaping public discourse. Their findings underscore the pervasive influence of memes on societal attitudes and interactions, shedding light on the compelling power of a well-timed chuckle in navigating the complexities of contemporary communication. Meanwhile, Doe's exploration of labor market trends in specialized sectors offers a sobering glimpse into the challenges and fluctuations faced by the field of special education. The nuanced examination of employment patterns and demographic shifts provides a compelling backdrop to our inquiry, prompting us to ponder the potential interplay between the levity of internet memes and the gravity of workforce dynamics.
Turning to the realm of non-fiction works, "Memes and Society: A Cultural Analysis" by Jones presents a thought-provoking exploration of the societal reverberations of internet humor. The author deftly navigates the landscape of digital jests, examining their multifaceted impact on collective consciousness and social narratives. Additionally, "Labor Dynamics: Trends and Tensions in Education" by Brown offers a comprehensive assessment of workforce fluctuations in educational domains, delving into the intricate tapestry of staffing challenges and employment dynamics. These works, while not directly addressing the specific intersection of 'thanks Obama' memes and special education teacher numbers in Utah, lay the groundwork for our contemplation of the interwoven strands of internet culture and labor market phenomena.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, the allegorical dimensions of meme culture come to the forefront in Orwell's "Nineteen Eighty-Four," where the manipulation of information and language imparts a hallmark of societal control. While a departure from the empirical landscape of our study, the thematic resonance between the meme milieu and the dystopian undercurrents of Orwellian fiction invites a moment of wry reflection. Similarly, the whimsical portrayal of societal conventions in Salinger's "The Catcher in the Rye" prompts us to consider the enigmatic nature of cultural symbols and their potential to permeate collective consciousness. These literary musings, though tangential to our empirical focus, serve as a testament to the enduring allure of cultural symbols and their resonant chords across diverse spheres.
Furthermore, a perusal of social media posts unveils a trove of anecdotal observations and transient quips that gesture towards the potential intertwining of 'thanks Obama' memes and educational staffing dynamics. Among these, a tweet by @MemeMaestro poses the rhetorical query, "Could the 'thanks Obama' meme hold the key to Utah's special education conundrum? #StatisticalStrangeness." While veiled in a veneer of online wit, such informal reflections beckon us to consider the uncharted territories of humor-infused insights and their unexpected pertinence to labor market phenomena.
As we assimilate these diverse sources into the fabric of our scholarly inquiry, we are reminded of the capricious undercurrents that infuse the whimsical with the weighty, prompting us to embark on a steadfast yet lighthearted pursuit of statistical unraveling. Thus, armed with a cavalcade of literary, anecdotal, and scholarly musings, we turn to the cogent realms of data analysis and statistical modeling, eager to illuminate the tale of 'thanks Obama' memes and special education staffing in the scenic expanse of Utah.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'thanks obama' meme and The number of special education teachers in Utah. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Trendy Memes and Education schemes: Exploring the Relationship between 'Thanks Obama' Popularity and Special Education Teacher Numbers in Utah
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a statistical investigation into the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the 'thanks Obama' meme and the employment figures of special education teachers in the state of Utah. By utilizing data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we assessed the connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9493559 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2012 to 2022. We discuss the potential implications of this unusual relationship, as well as the possible mechanisms at play. This study sheds light on the intricate and often surprising interplay between internet culture and labor market dynamics, leaving us pondering the profound question: "Is it all just an Obama-nation of coincidence?"
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the vast and ever-evolving landscape of internet memes, the 'thanks Obama' phenomenon stands as a testament to the enduring legacy of a political catchphrase. Originating during President Barack Obama's tenure, this meme took on a life of its own, serving as a humorous scapegoat for any and all inconveniences, perplexities, and disappointments encountered in daily life. Its pervasive presence in online discourse and social media platforms has made it a cultural touchstone, evoke chuckles, eye rolls, and the occasional existential crisis. Yet, amidst the sea of internet frivolity, who would have thought that this comedic rallying cry would spark a statistical conundrum with far-reaching implications for the field of education?
Simultaneously, within the realm of educational policy and workforce dynamics, the provision of special education services in the state of Utah has long been an area of interest and concern. The responsibilities of special education teachers encompass an array of deeply meaningful endeavors, from fostering inclusive learning environments to individualized educational programs and personal breakthroughs. Yet, the fluctuating numbers and staffing challenges in this specialized sector persist as an ongoing puzzle. Little did we anticipate that a lighthearted meme and the noble yet demanding profession of special education would find themselves entangled in a statistical tango of correlations and coefficients.
This research endeavor arises from the curious intersection of these divergent domains, aiming to unravel the perplexing relationship between the meteoric rise of the 'thanks Obama' meme and the employment figures of special education teachers in the scenic expanse of the Beehive State. By diving into the depths of data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embark on a journey to decipher the enigmatic dance of these seemingly disparate variables. As we traverse this analytical odyssey, we cannot help but marvel at the unexpectedness of our discoveries, leaving us to wonder if there may be more than meets the eye in this intricate interplay of internet fervor and pedagogical workforce dynamics.
Indulging in statistical inquiry, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in uncovering the hidden synapses of correlation, causation, and coincidence. With a dash of humor, a sprinkle of skepticism, and a dollop of statistical rigor, we set sail on this peculiar voyage of discovery, pausing only to ponder: Could it be that amidst the sea of 'thanks Obama' memes lie the currents of educational staffing dynamics, or are we merely navigating an Obama-nation of statistical whimsy?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To embark on our quest for unraveling the unexpected association between 'thanks Obama' meme popularity and the number of special education teachers in Utah, we employed a comprehensive and multifaceted research methodology. Our data collection and analysis strategies were designed to navigate through the ocean of internet trends and employment statistics, steering clear of the rocky shores of spurious correlations and confounding variables. The arsenal of statistical tools and techniques at our disposal allowed us to set sail on this curious voyage of exploration, armed with a compass of critical inquiry and a sextant of skeptical scrutiny.
Data Acquisition:
Our research team extracted data from Google Trends to capture the temporal ebbs and flows of 'thanks Obama' meme popularity from 2012 to 2022. The search interest indices were aggregated to encapsulate the overarching trajectory of this internet phenomenon, forming the navigational charts for our analytical expedition. Equally crucial was our acquisition of employment figures for special education teachers in the state of Utah from the esteemed Bureau of Labor Statistics. These figures served as the sextant that guided the alignment of our statistical bearings, allowing us to traverse the treacherous waters of labor market dynamics with confidence and precision.
Preprocessing and Harmonization:
Upon the acquisition of data from these disparate sources, a meticulous process of preprocessing and harmonization was undertaken to ensure the compatibility and coherence of the datasets. This involved aligning the temporal resolutions, smoothing out any erratic fluctuations, and integrating the disparate units of measurement into a unified framework. As we navigated the formidable seas of data preprocessing, we fortified our analytical vessel against the turbulent tides of measurement heterogeneity and temporal discordance. We utilized the tried-and-true methods of time series analysis and statistical smoothing to ensure a steady course through the agitated currents of data irregularities.
Correlation Analysis:
With our datasets harmonized and polished, we set our sights on the confluence of 'thanks Obama' meme popularity and special education teacher employment figures. Applying the venerable techniques of correlation analysis, we sought to unveil the hidden undercurrents of association between these seemingly unrelated variables. Through the deployment of Pearson, Spearman, and Kendall correlations, we navigated the capricious waves of statistical significance, probing the depths of correlation coefficients with unwavering determination and methodological moxie.
Time Series Modeling:
In order to capture the temporal nuances of the 'thanks Obama' meme popularity and special education teacher employment figures, we engaged in time series modeling with the finesse of seasoned navigators. By employing autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models and seasonal decomposition of time series (STL) techniques, we endeavored to chart the cyclical patterns, trends, and seasonal fluctuations inherent in these datasets. This analytical endeavor allowed us to navigate the temporal tempests with the precision of a sextant and the foresight of a seasoned mariner, unveiling the enduring rhythms embedded within the statistical seascape.
Multivariate Analysis:
Venturing deeper into the statistical expanse, we engaged in multivariate regression analyses to disentangle the nuanced interrelationships between 'thanks Obama' meme popularity, temporal trends, and the employment figures of special education teachers. By harnessing the power of multiple regression models and structural equation modeling, we meticulously charted the intricate paths of causation, covariance, and confounding variables. As we traversed the labyrinthine network of interwoven variables, we maintained a steady course through the tumultuous waves of statistical complexity, equipped with the compass of methodological rigor and the astrolabe of analytical acumen.
Validation and Sensitivity Analysis:
To fortify the robustness of our findings and ensure the seaworthiness of our analytical vessel, we conducted validation and sensitivity analyses with a steadfast commitment to scientific integrity. Sensitivity analyses involved perturbing the key parameters and assumptions underlying our statistical models, navigating the churning seas of uncertainty and variability with the steadfast resolve of methodological mariners. Validation procedures encompassed cross-validation techniques and Monte Carlo simulations, allowing us to weather the storms of statistical uncertainty and confirm the reliability of our findings with unwavering confidence and empirical rigor.
-------
This methodology took us through an odyssey of statistical exploration, from the turbulent waters of data acquisition to the uncharted territories of multivariate analysis and validation. As we navigated the tempestuous seas of statistical inquiry, we remained steadfast in our quest for uncovering the hidden treasures of correlation, causation, and coincidence, leaving no statistical stone unturned in the pursuit of scientific enlightenment.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'thanks obama' meme and The number of special education teachers in Utah. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .
For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9493559, r-squared of 0.9012767, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Trendy Memes and Education schemes: Exploring the Relationship between 'Thanks Obama' Popularity and Special Education Teacher Numbers in Utah
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a statistical investigation into the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the 'thanks Obama' meme and the employment figures of special education teachers in the state of Utah. By utilizing data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we assessed the connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9493559 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2012 to 2022. We discuss the potential implications of this unusual relationship, as well as the possible mechanisms at play. This study sheds light on the intricate and often surprising interplay between internet culture and labor market dynamics, leaving us pondering the profound question: "Is it all just an Obama-nation of coincidence?"
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the vast and ever-evolving landscape of internet memes, the 'thanks Obama' phenomenon stands as a testament to the enduring legacy of a political catchphrase. Originating during President Barack Obama's tenure, this meme took on a life of its own, serving as a humorous scapegoat for any and all inconveniences, perplexities, and disappointments encountered in daily life. Its pervasive presence in online discourse and social media platforms has made it a cultural touchstone, evoke chuckles, eye rolls, and the occasional existential crisis. Yet, amidst the sea of internet frivolity, who would have thought that this comedic rallying cry would spark a statistical conundrum with far-reaching implications for the field of education?
Simultaneously, within the realm of educational policy and workforce dynamics, the provision of special education services in the state of Utah has long been an area of interest and concern. The responsibilities of special education teachers encompass an array of deeply meaningful endeavors, from fostering inclusive learning environments to individualized educational programs and personal breakthroughs. Yet, the fluctuating numbers and staffing challenges in this specialized sector persist as an ongoing puzzle. Little did we anticipate that a lighthearted meme and the noble yet demanding profession of special education would find themselves entangled in a statistical tango of correlations and coefficients.
This research endeavor arises from the curious intersection of these divergent domains, aiming to unravel the perplexing relationship between the meteoric rise of the 'thanks Obama' meme and the employment figures of special education teachers in the scenic expanse of the Beehive State. By diving into the depths of data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embark on a journey to decipher the enigmatic dance of these seemingly disparate variables. As we traverse this analytical odyssey, we cannot help but marvel at the unexpectedness of our discoveries, leaving us to wonder if there may be more than meets the eye in this intricate interplay of internet fervor and pedagogical workforce dynamics.
Indulging in statistical inquiry, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in uncovering the hidden synapses of correlation, causation, and coincidence. With a dash of humor, a sprinkle of skepticism, and a dollop of statistical rigor, we set sail on this peculiar voyage of discovery, pausing only to ponder: Could it be that amidst the sea of 'thanks Obama' memes lie the currents of educational staffing dynamics, or are we merely navigating an Obama-nation of statistical whimsy?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the 'thanks Obama' meme and the number of special education teachers in Utah. Over the time period from 2012 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9493559, indicating a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation was further substantiated by an r-squared value of 0.9012767, signifying that approximately 90% of the variance in the number of special education teachers in Utah can be explained by the popularity of the 'thanks Obama' meme. With a significance level of p < 0.01, these findings hold substantial statistical weight and warrant further investigation into the underlying mechanisms at play.
Notably, the presence of a correlation coefficient approaching one indicates that as the popularity of the 'thanks Obama' meme increased, so did the number of special education teachers in Utah. While this association may seem as unlikely as a politician moonlighting as a stand-up comedian, our data tells a different story. The unexpected harmony between internet humor and educational staffing dynamics raises intriguing questions about the potential influence of viral trends on labor market trends. Could it be that the cultural reverberations of a meme have surreptitiously shaped employment patterns in the specialized field of special education? Or perhaps we are merely witnessing a statistical mirage, akin to finding causation in a spurious correlation.
To visually encapsulate this remarkable relationship, we have included a scatterplot (Fig. 1) that illustrates the robust correlation between the 'thanks Obama' meme and the number of special education teachers in Utah. The scatterplot beckons the viewer to contemplate the enigmatic interplay between these variables and, perhaps, to ponder whether the universe has a penchant for confounding memes with meaningful metrics.
In conclusion, our findings offer a thought-provoking glimpse into the intertwined realms of internet culture and educational labor dynamics, challenging us to consider the potential impact of viral phenomena on real-world employment patterns. As we navigate this confluence of statistical serendipity and speculative inquiry, one cannot help but wonder if there is more to this statistical tale than meets the eye, or if we are simply caught in the ripple of an Obama-nation of statistical whimsy.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'thanks obama' meme and The number of special education teachers in Utah. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Trendy Memes and Education schemes: Exploring the Relationship between 'Thanks Obama' Popularity and Special Education Teacher Numbers in Utah
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a statistical investigation into the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the 'thanks Obama' meme and the employment figures of special education teachers in the state of Utah. By utilizing data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we assessed the connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9493559 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2012 to 2022. We discuss the potential implications of this unusual relationship, as well as the possible mechanisms at play. This study sheds light on the intricate and often surprising interplay between internet culture and labor market dynamics, leaving us pondering the profound question: "Is it all just an Obama-nation of coincidence?"
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The preceding discussion has highlighted the unprecedented convergence of disparate realms, from the expanse of internet humor to the intricacies of educational workforce dynamics. As we endeavor to decipher the enigmatic relationship between the meteoric rise of the 'thanks Obama' meme and the employment figures of special education teachers in Utah, we turn to the existing literature for insights, elucidation, and the occasional chuckle.
Smith et al. conducted a comprehensive study on internet memes and their social impact, delving into the cultural significance of digital humor in shaping public discourse. Their findings underscore the pervasive influence of memes on societal attitudes and interactions, shedding light on the compelling power of a well-timed chuckle in navigating the complexities of contemporary communication. Meanwhile, Doe's exploration of labor market trends in specialized sectors offers a sobering glimpse into the challenges and fluctuations faced by the field of special education. The nuanced examination of employment patterns and demographic shifts provides a compelling backdrop to our inquiry, prompting us to ponder the potential interplay between the levity of internet memes and the gravity of workforce dynamics.
Turning to the realm of non-fiction works, "Memes and Society: A Cultural Analysis" by Jones presents a thought-provoking exploration of the societal reverberations of internet humor. The author deftly navigates the landscape of digital jests, examining their multifaceted impact on collective consciousness and social narratives. Additionally, "Labor Dynamics: Trends and Tensions in Education" by Brown offers a comprehensive assessment of workforce fluctuations in educational domains, delving into the intricate tapestry of staffing challenges and employment dynamics. These works, while not directly addressing the specific intersection of 'thanks Obama' memes and special education teacher numbers in Utah, lay the groundwork for our contemplation of the interwoven strands of internet culture and labor market phenomena.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, the allegorical dimensions of meme culture come to the forefront in Orwell's "Nineteen Eighty-Four," where the manipulation of information and language imparts a hallmark of societal control. While a departure from the empirical landscape of our study, the thematic resonance between the meme milieu and the dystopian undercurrents of Orwellian fiction invites a moment of wry reflection. Similarly, the whimsical portrayal of societal conventions in Salinger's "The Catcher in the Rye" prompts us to consider the enigmatic nature of cultural symbols and their potential to permeate collective consciousness. These literary musings, though tangential to our empirical focus, serve as a testament to the enduring allure of cultural symbols and their resonant chords across diverse spheres.
Furthermore, a perusal of social media posts unveils a trove of anecdotal observations and transient quips that gesture towards the potential intertwining of 'thanks Obama' memes and educational staffing dynamics. Among these, a tweet by @MemeMaestro poses the rhetorical query, "Could the 'thanks Obama' meme hold the key to Utah's special education conundrum? #StatisticalStrangeness." While veiled in a veneer of online wit, such informal reflections beckon us to consider the uncharted territories of humor-infused insights and their unexpected pertinence to labor market phenomena.
As we assimilate these diverse sources into the fabric of our scholarly inquiry, we are reminded of the capricious undercurrents that infuse the whimsical with the weighty, prompting us to embark on a steadfast yet lighthearted pursuit of statistical unraveling. Thus, armed with a cavalcade of literary, anecdotal, and scholarly musings, we turn to the cogent realms of data analysis and statistical modeling, eager to illuminate the tale of 'thanks Obama' memes and special education staffing in the scenic expanse of Utah.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the 'thanks Obama' meme and the number of special education teachers in Utah. Over the time period from 2012 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9493559, indicating a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation was further substantiated by an r-squared value of 0.9012767, signifying that approximately 90% of the variance in the number of special education teachers in Utah can be explained by the popularity of the 'thanks Obama' meme. With a significance level of p < 0.01, these findings hold substantial statistical weight and warrant further investigation into the underlying mechanisms at play.
Notably, the presence of a correlation coefficient approaching one indicates that as the popularity of the 'thanks Obama' meme increased, so did the number of special education teachers in Utah. While this association may seem as unlikely as a politician moonlighting as a stand-up comedian, our data tells a different story. The unexpected harmony between internet humor and educational staffing dynamics raises intriguing questions about the potential influence of viral trends on labor market trends. Could it be that the cultural reverberations of a meme have surreptitiously shaped employment patterns in the specialized field of special education? Or perhaps we are merely witnessing a statistical mirage, akin to finding causation in a spurious correlation.
To visually encapsulate this remarkable relationship, we have included a scatterplot (Fig. 1) that illustrates the robust correlation between the 'thanks Obama' meme and the number of special education teachers in Utah. The scatterplot beckons the viewer to contemplate the enigmatic interplay between these variables and, perhaps, to ponder whether the universe has a penchant for confounding memes with meaningful metrics.
In conclusion, our findings offer a thought-provoking glimpse into the intertwined realms of internet culture and educational labor dynamics, challenging us to consider the potential impact of viral phenomena on real-world employment patterns. As we navigate this confluence of statistical serendipity and speculative inquiry, one cannot help but wonder if there is more to this statistical tale than meets the eye, or if we are simply caught in the ripple of an Obama-nation of statistical whimsy.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The confluence of our findings with prior research illuminates the intricate interplay between internet culture and labor market dynamics. Smith et al.'s study on internet memes' social impact resonates with our investigation, as we too observed the pervasive influence of memes on societal phenomena. Much like the unexpected punchline in a statistical analysis, the correlation we uncovered hints at the sporadic yet potent impact of viral trends on real-world dynamics. Similarly, Doe's examination of labor market trends in specialized sectors offers a sobering reminder of the gravity of workforce dynamics, even as we find ourselves grappling with the absurdity of a meme bridging realms of internet humor and education.
Dubbed as a "statistical mirage" in our findings, the unexpected harmony between the 'thanks Obama' meme and the number of special education teachers in Utah prompts us to navigate the line between statistical significance and serendipity with a blend of bafflement and amusement. As we contemplate the potential impact of viral phenomena on real-world employment patterns, one cannot help but recall the tweet by @MemeMaestro, infusing the academic inquiry with a hint of online wit and prompting us to consider the uncharted territories of internet humor in statistical exploration.
The correlation coefficient approaching near unity, reminiscent of the unlikely scenario of a politician moonlighting as a stand-up comedian, underscores the need for continued exploration into the underlying mechanisms at play. While our findings offer a compelling glimpse into the interwoven strands of internet culture and labor market phenomena, they also beckon us to confront the statistical whimsy inherent in unexpected correlations.
In closing, our rigorous statistical unraveling of the 'thanks Obama' meme's influence on the employment figures of special education teachers in Utah encourages a blend of lighthearted speculation and steadfast inquiry. As we navigate this confluence of statistical serendipity and speculative inquiry, one cannot help but wonder if there is more to this statistical tale than meets the eye, or if we are simply ensnared in the ripple of an Obama-nation of statistical whimsy.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'thanks obama' meme and The number of special education teachers in Utah. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Trendy Memes and Education schemes: Exploring the Relationship between 'Thanks Obama' Popularity and Special Education Teacher Numbers in Utah
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a statistical investigation into the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the 'thanks Obama' meme and the employment figures of special education teachers in the state of Utah. By utilizing data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we assessed the connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9493559 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2012 to 2022. We discuss the potential implications of this unusual relationship, as well as the possible mechanisms at play. This study sheds light on the intricate and often surprising interplay between internet culture and labor market dynamics, leaving us pondering the profound question: "Is it all just an Obama-nation of coincidence?"
[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the vast and ever-evolving landscape of internet memes, the 'thanks Obama' phenomenon stands as a testament to the enduring legacy of a political catchphrase. Originating during President Barack Obama's tenure, this meme took on a life of its own, serving as a humorous scapegoat for any and all inconveniences, perplexities, and disappointments encountered in daily life. Its pervasive presence in online discourse and social media platforms has made it a cultural touchstone, evoke chuckles, eye rolls, and the occasional existential crisis. Yet, amidst the sea of internet frivolity, who would have thought that this comedic rallying cry would spark a statistical conundrum with far-reaching implications for the field of education?
Simultaneously, within the realm of educational policy and workforce dynamics, the provision of special education services in the state of Utah has long been an area of interest and concern. The responsibilities of special education teachers encompass an array of deeply meaningful endeavors, from fostering inclusive learning environments to individualized educational programs and personal breakthroughs. Yet, the fluctuating numbers and staffing challenges in this specialized sector persist as an ongoing puzzle. Little did we anticipate that a lighthearted meme and the noble yet demanding profession of special education would find themselves entangled in a statistical tango of correlations and coefficients.
This research endeavor arises from the curious intersection of these divergent domains, aiming to unravel the perplexing relationship between the meteoric rise of the 'thanks Obama' meme and the employment figures of special education teachers in the scenic expanse of the Beehive State. By diving into the depths of data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embark on a journey to decipher the enigmatic dance of these seemingly disparate variables. As we traverse this analytical odyssey, we cannot help but marvel at the unexpectedness of our discoveries, leaving us to wonder if there may be more than meets the eye in this intricate interplay of internet fervor and pedagogical workforce dynamics.
Indulging in statistical inquiry, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in uncovering the hidden synapses of correlation, causation, and coincidence. With a dash of humor, a sprinkle of skepticism, and a dollop of statistical rigor, we set sail on this peculiar voyage of discovery, pausing only to ponder: Could it be that amidst the sea of 'thanks Obama' memes lie the currents of educational staffing dynamics, or are we merely navigating an Obama-nation of statistical whimsy?
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the 'thanks Obama' meme and the number of special education teachers in Utah. Over the time period from 2012 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9493559, indicating a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation was further substantiated by an r-squared value of 0.9012767, signifying that approximately 90% of the variance in the number of special education teachers in Utah can be explained by the popularity of the 'thanks Obama' meme. With a significance level of p < 0.01, these findings hold substantial statistical weight and warrant further investigation into the underlying mechanisms at play.
Notably, the presence of a correlation coefficient approaching one indicates that as the popularity of the 'thanks Obama' meme increased, so did the number of special education teachers in Utah. While this association may seem as unlikely as a politician moonlighting as a stand-up comedian, our data tells a different story. The unexpected harmony between internet humor and educational staffing dynamics raises intriguing questions about the potential influence of viral trends on labor market trends. Could it be that the cultural reverberations of a meme have surreptitiously shaped employment patterns in the specialized field of special education? Or perhaps we are merely witnessing a statistical mirage, akin to finding causation in a spurious correlation.
To visually encapsulate this remarkable relationship, we have included a scatterplot (Fig. 1) that illustrates the robust correlation between the 'thanks Obama' meme and the number of special education teachers in Utah. The scatterplot beckons the viewer to contemplate the enigmatic interplay between these variables and, perhaps, to ponder whether the universe has a penchant for confounding memes with meaningful metrics.
In conclusion, our findings offer a thought-provoking glimpse into the intertwined realms of internet culture and educational labor dynamics, challenging us to consider the potential impact of viral phenomena on real-world employment patterns. As we navigate this confluence of statistical serendipity and speculative inquiry, one cannot help but wonder if there is more to this statistical tale than meets the eye, or if we are simply caught in the ripple of an Obama-nation of statistical whimsy.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In light of our statistically significant and somewhat teasing findings, it is evident that the 'thanks Obama' meme holds an unexpected sway over the employment figures of special education teachers in Utah. This peculiar correlation raises intriguing questions about the clandestine influence of internet culture on the labor market, prompting us to contemplate the hidden forces at play. Our journey through the statistical landscape of memes and workforce dynamics has proven to be a captivating odyssey, leaving us to ponder whether we are witnessing a statistical mirage or an underlying causal mechanism worthy of further investigation.
However, while the allure of this unanticipated relationship may beckon us to delve deeper into the abyss of statistical whimsy, it is with a hint of statistical irony that we assert the conclusive nature of this study. The sheer magnitude of the correlation coefficient and the compelling visual representation in our scatterplot (Fig. 1) elevate our understanding of this improbable association. We humbly submit that no further research may be needed to unravel the enigmatic connection between the 'thanks Obama' meme and the number of special education teachers in Utah. As we bid adieu to this statistical expedition, we are left to ponder the age-old question: Is it all just an Obama-nation of statistical serendipity, or are we glimpsing the intricate dance of correlated variables that eludes our understanding?
In the words of the meme itself, we extend our gratitude to the statistical forces at play and conclude that, perhaps, for now, we can collectively say "thanks, Obama" for this statistical puzzler.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Trendy Memes and Education schemes: Exploring the Relationship between 'Thanks Obama' Popularity and Special Education Teacher Numbers in Utah. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Memetic Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Trendy Memes and Education schemes: Exploring the Relationship between 'Thanks Obama' Popularity and Special Education Teacher Numbers in Utah. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Internet Culture and Educational Impact
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Trendy Memes and Education schemes: Exploring the Relationship between 'Thanks Obama' Popularity and Special Education Teacher Numbers in Utah with an abstract of This paper presents a statistical investigation into the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the 'thanks Obama' meme and the employment figures of special education teachers in the state of Utah. By utilizing data from Google Trends and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we assessed the connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9493559 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2012 to 2022. We discuss the potential implications of this unusual relationship, as well as the possible mechanisms at play. This study sheds light on the intricate and often surprising interplay between internet culture and labor market dynamics, leaving us pondering the profound question: "Is it all just an Obama-nation of coincidence?
ChatGPT:
'Thanks Obama' meme, special education teachers Utah, Google Trends, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation between meme popularity and employment, internet culture and labor market dynamics, 'Thanks Obama' meme popularity 2012-2022, potential implications of correlation
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Popularity of the 'thanks obama' memeDetailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'thanks obama' (without quotes, in the United States)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.
See what else correlates with Popularity of the 'thanks obama' meme
The number of special education teachers in Utah
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of special education teachers, kindergarten and elementary school in Utah
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of special education teachers in Utah
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9012767 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 90.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of special education teachers in Utah) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the 'thanks obama' meme) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.05E-6. 0.0000080537671314951030000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 0.000805% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 124,165 random variables You don't actually need 124 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.81, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
Popularity of the 'thanks obama' meme (Relative popularity) | 5.41667 | 43.1667 | 22.3333 | 33.0833 | 18.8333 | 11.5833 | 6.41667 | 3.66667 | 4.08333 | 2.16667 | 2.08333 |
The number of special education teachers in Utah (Laborers) | 1450 | 1850 | 1670 | 1790 | 1580 | 1400 | 1490 | 1420 | 1280 | 1400 | 1360 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([5.41667,43.1667,22.3333,33.0833,18.8333,11.5833,6.41667,3.66667,4.08333,2.16667,2.08333,])
array_2 = np.array([1450,1850,1670,1790,1580,1400,1490,1420,1280,1400,1360,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the 'thanks obama' meme"
array_2_name = "The number of special education teachers in Utah"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Popularity of the 'thanks obama' meme
- Line chart for only The number of special education teachers in Utah
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Trendy Memes and Education schemes: Exploring the Relationship between 'Thanks Obama' Popularity and Special Education Teacher Numbers in Utah
Kudos for rating!
Correlation ID: 5014 · Black Variable ID: 25153 · Red Variable ID: 19536