about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,989 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Lafayette, Louisiana and the second variable is Average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The smog in the air was creating intricate patterns that mirrored the mathematical beauty Vihart explores, sparking a surge in discussions about her content. With each breath of polluted air, viewers found themselves strangely compelled to engage in lively mathematical debates in the comment section. The correlation between air pollution in Lafayette, Louisiana and the average number of comments on Vihart YouTube videos can only be explained by this bizarre, pollution-induced mathematical enthusiasm.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a cyberpunk-inspired cityscape set in Lafayette, Louisiana, with colorful and vibrant smog swirling through the air. The smog forms intricate and mesmerizing patterns reminiscent of mathematical shapes and formulas, creating an otherworldly and futuristic atmosphere. Within the scene, people can be seen engaging in lively discussions about mathematical concepts inspired by Vihart's YouTube videos, with their enthusiasm evident in the polluted air around them. The visuals should encapsulate the strange yet captivating correlation between air pollution and the energetic discussions surrounding Vihart's mathematical content. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Lafayette, Louisiana and Average number of comments on Vihart YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyberpunk Photorealism Cutsy graphics Magic realism a meme
ChatGPT: Cyberpunk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Lafayette, Louisiana and Average number of comments on Vihart YouTube videos, in the following situation: The smog in the air was creating intricate patterns that mirrored the mathematical beauty Vihart explores, sparking a surge in discussions about her content. With each breath of polluted air, viewers found themselves strangely compelled to engage in lively mathematical debates in the comment section. The correlation between air pollution in Lafayette, Louisiana and the average number of comments on Vihart YouTube videos can only be explained by this bizarre, pollution-induced mathematical enthusiasm.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Lafayette, Louisiana, the smog in the air forms mesmerizing patterns that reflect the mathematical beauty of Vihart's YouTube videos. As people breathe in the polluted air, they find themselves immersed in lively discussions about mathematical concepts in the comment section of Vihart's videos. The correlation between air pollution and the average number of comments on Vihart's videos is evident in this strange, pollution-induced mathematical enthusiasm.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyberpunk ] and depicting this scene: In Lafayette, Louisiana, the smog in the air forms mesmerizing patterns that reflect the mathematical beauty of Vihart's YouTube videos. As people breathe in the polluted air, they find themselves immersed in lively discussions about mathematical concepts in the comment section of Vihart's videos. The correlation between air pollution and the average number of comments on Vihart's videos is evident in this strange, pollution-induced mathematical enthusiasm. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a cyberpunk-inspired cityscape set in Lafayette, Louisiana, with colorful and vibrant smog swirling through the air. The smog forms intricate and mesmerizing patterns reminiscent of mathematical shapes and formulas, creating an otherworldly and futuristic atmosphere. Within the scene, people can be seen engaging in lively discussions about mathematical concepts inspired by Vihart's YouTube videos, with their enthusiasm evident in the polluted air around them. The visuals should encapsulate the strange yet captivating correlation between air pollution and the energetic discussions surrounding Vihart's mathematical content.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Air pollution in Lafayette, Louisiana positively influenced Average number of comments on Vihart YouTube videos.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Lafayette's Lousy Air: Linking Air Pollution with Vihart's Video Views

Journal of Environmental Psychology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Lafayette, Louisiana and Average number of comments on Vihart YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8172750 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Lafayette's Lousy Air: Linking Air Pollution with Vihart's Video Views

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the association between air pollution levels in Lafayette, Louisiana, and the average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and YouTube analytics, we aimed to uncover any potential relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8172750 along with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2023. This intriguing connection prompts further exploration into the sociocultural implications of air quality on online engagement, shedding light on the air-ily amusing influence of environmental factors on digital discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Lafayette, Louisiana and Average number of comments on Vihart YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Lafayette's Lousy Air: Linking Air Pollution with Vihart's Video Views

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the association between air pollution levels in Lafayette, Louisiana, and the average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and YouTube analytics, we aimed to uncover any potential relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8172750 along with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2023. This intriguing connection prompts further exploration into the sociocultural implications of air quality on online engagement, shedding light on the air-ily amusing influence of environmental factors on digital discourse.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The impact of air pollution on human health and well-being has been a topic of great interest and concern for decades. With the rapid industrial development and urbanization, the quality of air has become a pertinent issue in many regions across the globe. While the detrimental effects of air pollution on physical health are well-documented, the potential influence of air quality on seemingly unrelated aspects of human life has not been extensively explored. In this study, we delve into the unexpected realm of digital engagement by examining the association between air pollution levels in Lafayette, Louisiana, and the average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos.

Vihart, a renowned creator on YouTube, is known for her engaging and educational content, often covering mathematical and artistic topics. Her channel has garnered a significant following, with an extensive and active community of viewers who express their thoughts through comments on her videos. Our curious investigation seeks to uncover the peculiar relationship between the air quality in Lafayette and the level of interaction and participation in discussions of Vihart's thought-provoking content.

Although on the surface, the connection between air pollution and YouTube engagement may appear as elusive as the probability of fitting an entire parabola into a Twitter post, our findings present a compelling correlation that may raise eyebrows and lead to unexpected revelations. Through rigorous data analysis and statistical modeling, we aim to shed light on this quirky correlation and its implications, while also injecting a dash of whimsy and curiosity into the realm of environmental and digital studies. This examination promises to provide a breath of fresh air, or perhaps polluted air, into the scholarly discourse on the intersection of environmental factors and online behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Lafayette, Louisiana and Average number of comments on Vihart YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Lafayette's Lousy Air: Linking Air Pollution with Vihart's Video Views

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the association between air pollution levels in Lafayette, Louisiana, and the average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and YouTube analytics, we aimed to uncover any potential relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8172750 along with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2023. This intriguing connection prompts further exploration into the sociocultural implications of air quality on online engagement, shedding light on the air-ily amusing influence of environmental factors on digital discourse.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The impact of air pollution on human health and well-being has been a topic of great interest and concern for decades. With the rapid industrial development and urbanization, the quality of air has become a pertinent issue in many regions across the globe. While the detrimental effects of air pollution on physical health are well-documented, the potential influence of air quality on seemingly unrelated aspects of human life has not been extensively explored. In this study, we delve into the unexpected realm of digital engagement by examining the association between air pollution levels in Lafayette, Louisiana, and the average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos.
Vihart, a renowned creator on YouTube, is known for her engaging and educational content, often covering mathematical and artistic topics. Her channel has garnered a significant following, with an extensive and active community of viewers who express their thoughts through comments on her videos. Our curious investigation seeks to uncover the peculiar relationship between the air quality in Lafayette and the level of interaction and participation in discussions of Vihart's thought-provoking content.
Although on the surface, the connection between air pollution and YouTube engagement may appear as elusive as the probability of fitting an entire parabola into a Twitter post, our findings present a compelling correlation that may raise eyebrows and lead to unexpected revelations. Through rigorous data analysis and statistical modeling, we aim to shed light on this quirky correlation and its implications, while also injecting a dash of whimsy and curiosity into the realm of environmental and digital studies. This examination promises to provide a breath of fresh air, or perhaps polluted air, into the scholarly discourse on the intersection of environmental factors and online behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The existing body of literature has examined the impact of air pollution on a myriad of outcomes, from respiratory health to economic productivity. Smith et al. (2018) conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of air quality studies, revealing a clear link between air pollution exposure and adverse health effects, a correlation more closely entwined than a tangled Sierpinski triangle. Doe and Jones (2020) took a different approach, investigating the societal costs of air pollution, uncovering economic burdens as weighty as a ton of particulate matter.

Moving beyond the conventional landscape of air pollution research, we venture into uncharted territory by exploring the whimsical relationship between air quality and online engagement. Turning to the world of literature, "Air Quality and Digital Discourse: A Novel Connection" by Environmentalist and Wordsmith blends environmental science with linguistic whimsy, painting a vivid picture of the ethereal dance between air particles and digital musings. In a similar vein, "Breathing Bytes: Exploring the Unseen Connection Between Air Quality and Online Activity" by Cybernetic Scribe delves into the digital atmosphere, unveiling the unseen currents that shape online interaction.

Expanding our exploration into the realm of fiction, "The Smoggy Serenade" by P. Pollutant crafts a tale of love and laughter amidst the haze of a polluted city, offering a lighthearted, yet poignant, reflection on the human spirit's resilience in the face of environmental challenges. Additionally, "Mist and Memes: A Story of Airborne Amusement" by N. Novelist captures the essence of online culture amidst a fog of atmospheric uncertainty, beckoning readers into a world where airborne particles and internet humor intersect in unexpected ways.

In the digital domain, social media posts have also provided intriguing glimpses into the intersection of air quality and online engagement. @CleanAirAdvocate tweeted, "Just like clean air refreshes the lungs, it seems to also breathe new life into online conversations – a welcome breath of fresh digital air!" Meanwhile, @PollutionPundit pondered, "Could air pollution be clouding our online judgment? Let's clear the air on this pressing matter!"

As we navigate through this engaging and at times, comically surreal, landscape of literature and social media discourse, we prepare to embark on our own empirical journey into the intriguing correlation between air pollution in Lafayette and the average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos. Our quest is guided not only by academic rigor but also by a playful spirit of curiosity, as we seek to unravel the unexpected threads that tie air quality and digital engagement in a whimsically tangled web.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Lafayette, Louisiana and Average number of comments on Vihart YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and YouTube . You used data from 2009 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Lafayette's Lousy Air: Linking Air Pollution with Vihart's Video Views

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the association between air pollution levels in Lafayette, Louisiana, and the average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and YouTube analytics, we aimed to uncover any potential relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8172750 along with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2023. This intriguing connection prompts further exploration into the sociocultural implications of air quality on online engagement, shedding light on the air-ily amusing influence of environmental factors on digital discourse.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The impact of air pollution on human health and well-being has been a topic of great interest and concern for decades. With the rapid industrial development and urbanization, the quality of air has become a pertinent issue in many regions across the globe. While the detrimental effects of air pollution on physical health are well-documented, the potential influence of air quality on seemingly unrelated aspects of human life has not been extensively explored. In this study, we delve into the unexpected realm of digital engagement by examining the association between air pollution levels in Lafayette, Louisiana, and the average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos.
Vihart, a renowned creator on YouTube, is known for her engaging and educational content, often covering mathematical and artistic topics. Her channel has garnered a significant following, with an extensive and active community of viewers who express their thoughts through comments on her videos. Our curious investigation seeks to uncover the peculiar relationship between the air quality in Lafayette and the level of interaction and participation in discussions of Vihart's thought-provoking content.
Although on the surface, the connection between air pollution and YouTube engagement may appear as elusive as the probability of fitting an entire parabola into a Twitter post, our findings present a compelling correlation that may raise eyebrows and lead to unexpected revelations. Through rigorous data analysis and statistical modeling, we aim to shed light on this quirky correlation and its implications, while also injecting a dash of whimsy and curiosity into the realm of environmental and digital studies. This examination promises to provide a breath of fresh air, or perhaps polluted air, into the scholarly discourse on the intersection of environmental factors and online behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In order to unravel the enigmatic connection between air pollution in Lafayette, Louisiana, and the average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos, a multidimensional approach was employed, blending environmental data analysis with digital engagement metrics. The data utilized in this study was meticulously gathered from various sources, including the Environmental Protection Agency's Air Quality System, YouTube analytics, and a healthy dose of investigative curiosity.

Firstly, air quality data for Lafayette was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency, spanning from 2009 to 2023. This data encompassed key pollutants such as particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), and ozone (O3). This exhaustive dataset allowed for a comprehensive assessment of the atmospheric conditions in Lafayette, capturing both the subtle nuances of air composition and the occasional grandiose flourish of pollutant episodes.

Simultaneously, information pertaining to Vihart's YouTube videos, including the number of views and comments, was extracted from the depths of YouTube analytics. Considering the magnitude of digital content consumption, the sheer volume of interactions with Vihart's videos presented a fascinating canvas for observing the intricacies of online discourse, akin to deciphering the elusive patterns of a fractal artwork.

To carry out the analysis, a series of statistical methods and modeling techniques were employed. The relationship between air pollution levels and the average number of comments on Vihart's videos was assessed through correlation analysis, regression modeling, and time series analysis. This multi-pronged approach allowed for a nuanced examination of the complex interplay between environmental factors and digital engagement, akin to untangling a perplexing mathematical knot while simultaneously contemplating the aesthetic beauty of a geometric proof.

The statistical significance of the observed association was evaluated using hypothesis testing, with a firm commitment to maintaining an alpha level of 0.01 to ensure the veracity of the findings amidst the tempestuous sea of data ambiguity. Furthermore, various control variables, including temporal trends, seasonal effects, and Vihart's video themes, were carefully considered to ascertain the robustness of the identified relationship, akin to delineating the boundaries of a mutable equation with a keen eye for detail and a sprinkle of mathematical intuition.

Lastly, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to scrutinize the stability of the results, fortifying the study's resilience against potential confounding variables and ensuring that the discovered link between air pollution in Lafayette and Vihart's YouTube engagement was not as fleeting as a passing gust of air, but rather as enduring as the enduring allure of a captivating mathematical puzzle.

The culmination of these methodological endeavors engendered a comprehensive understanding of the interwoven tales of air quality and digital dialogues, thereby paving the way for illuminating the peculiar connection between environmental ambiance and online engagement, inspiring a sense of scholarly wonderment and inquisitive delight.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Lafayette, Louisiana and Average number of comments on Vihart YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and YouTube .

For the time period 2009 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8172750, r-squared of 0.6679383, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Lafayette's Lousy Air: Linking Air Pollution with Vihart's Video Views

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the association between air pollution levels in Lafayette, Louisiana, and the average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and YouTube analytics, we aimed to uncover any potential relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8172750 along with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2023. This intriguing connection prompts further exploration into the sociocultural implications of air quality on online engagement, shedding light on the air-ily amusing influence of environmental factors on digital discourse.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The impact of air pollution on human health and well-being has been a topic of great interest and concern for decades. With the rapid industrial development and urbanization, the quality of air has become a pertinent issue in many regions across the globe. While the detrimental effects of air pollution on physical health are well-documented, the potential influence of air quality on seemingly unrelated aspects of human life has not been extensively explored. In this study, we delve into the unexpected realm of digital engagement by examining the association between air pollution levels in Lafayette, Louisiana, and the average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos.
Vihart, a renowned creator on YouTube, is known for her engaging and educational content, often covering mathematical and artistic topics. Her channel has garnered a significant following, with an extensive and active community of viewers who express their thoughts through comments on her videos. Our curious investigation seeks to uncover the peculiar relationship between the air quality in Lafayette and the level of interaction and participation in discussions of Vihart's thought-provoking content.
Although on the surface, the connection between air pollution and YouTube engagement may appear as elusive as the probability of fitting an entire parabola into a Twitter post, our findings present a compelling correlation that may raise eyebrows and lead to unexpected revelations. Through rigorous data analysis and statistical modeling, we aim to shed light on this quirky correlation and its implications, while also injecting a dash of whimsy and curiosity into the realm of environmental and digital studies. This examination promises to provide a breath of fresh air, or perhaps polluted air, into the scholarly discourse on the intersection of environmental factors and online behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8172750 between air pollution levels in Lafayette, Louisiana, and the average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos. This correlation was further substantiated by an r-squared value of 0.6679383, emphasizing the robustness of the relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 added a cherry on top of this statistical sundae, indicating a highly significant association that would make even the most skeptical statistician raise an intrigued eyebrow.

Figure 1 exhibits a scatterplot illustrating the noteworthy correlation between air pollution and Vihart's video engagement. One could say that the data points are as tightly packed as the confines of a stuffy room with poor ventilation, further emphasizing the strength of the correlation. The lighthearted observer might even discern a pattern resembling a smoggy cloud of data points, metaphorically encapsulating the hazy relationship between air quality and online interaction.

These findings not only provide quantitative support for the link between air pollution and digital engagement, but they also beckon for a deeper exploration of the underlying mechanisms driving this unexpected relationship. It appears that even in the digital realm, the noxious tendrils of air pollution can reach out and leave an imprint on online activities—a revelation that is as surprising as stumbling upon a rare gem in a pile of statistical rubble.

In summary, our study offers a breath of fresh air, or perhaps a lungful of polluted air, to the scholarly literature by unearthing this curious and unexpected correlation. It invites further inquiry into the sociocultural impact of environmental factors on digital behavior, serving as a reminder that the unseen forces of air pollution can extend beyond mere physical health to influence the ethereal realms of digital discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Lafayette, Louisiana and Average number of comments on Vihart YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Lafayette's Lousy Air: Linking Air Pollution with Vihart's Video Views

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the association between air pollution levels in Lafayette, Louisiana, and the average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and YouTube analytics, we aimed to uncover any potential relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8172750 along with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2023. This intriguing connection prompts further exploration into the sociocultural implications of air quality on online engagement, shedding light on the air-ily amusing influence of environmental factors on digital discourse.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The existing body of literature has examined the impact of air pollution on a myriad of outcomes, from respiratory health to economic productivity. Smith et al. (2018) conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of air quality studies, revealing a clear link between air pollution exposure and adverse health effects, a correlation more closely entwined than a tangled Sierpinski triangle. Doe and Jones (2020) took a different approach, investigating the societal costs of air pollution, uncovering economic burdens as weighty as a ton of particulate matter.
Moving beyond the conventional landscape of air pollution research, we venture into uncharted territory by exploring the whimsical relationship between air quality and online engagement. Turning to the world of literature, "Air Quality and Digital Discourse: A Novel Connection" by Environmentalist and Wordsmith blends environmental science with linguistic whimsy, painting a vivid picture of the ethereal dance between air particles and digital musings. In a similar vein, "Breathing Bytes: Exploring the Unseen Connection Between Air Quality and Online Activity" by Cybernetic Scribe delves into the digital atmosphere, unveiling the unseen currents that shape online interaction.
Expanding our exploration into the realm of fiction, "The Smoggy Serenade" by P. Pollutant crafts a tale of love and laughter amidst the haze of a polluted city, offering a lighthearted, yet poignant, reflection on the human spirit's resilience in the face of environmental challenges. Additionally, "Mist and Memes: A Story of Airborne Amusement" by N. Novelist captures the essence of online culture amidst a fog of atmospheric uncertainty, beckoning readers into a world where airborne particles and internet humor intersect in unexpected ways.
In the digital domain, social media posts have also provided intriguing glimpses into the intersection of air quality and online engagement. @CleanAirAdvocate tweeted, "Just like clean air refreshes the lungs, it seems to also breathe new life into online conversations – a welcome breath of fresh digital air!" Meanwhile, @PollutionPundit pondered, "Could air pollution be clouding our online judgment? Let's clear the air on this pressing matter!"
As we navigate through this engaging and at times, comically surreal, landscape of literature and social media discourse, we prepare to embark on our own empirical journey into the intriguing correlation between air pollution in Lafayette and the average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos. Our quest is guided not only by academic rigor but also by a playful spirit of curiosity, as we seek to unravel the unexpected threads that tie air quality and digital engagement in a whimsically tangled web.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8172750 between air pollution levels in Lafayette, Louisiana, and the average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos. This correlation was further substantiated by an r-squared value of 0.6679383, emphasizing the robustness of the relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 added a cherry on top of this statistical sundae, indicating a highly significant association that would make even the most skeptical statistician raise an intrigued eyebrow.
Figure 1 exhibits a scatterplot illustrating the noteworthy correlation between air pollution and Vihart's video engagement. One could say that the data points are as tightly packed as the confines of a stuffy room with poor ventilation, further emphasizing the strength of the correlation. The lighthearted observer might even discern a pattern resembling a smoggy cloud of data points, metaphorically encapsulating the hazy relationship between air quality and online interaction.
These findings not only provide quantitative support for the link between air pollution and digital engagement, but they also beckon for a deeper exploration of the underlying mechanisms driving this unexpected relationship. It appears that even in the digital realm, the noxious tendrils of air pollution can reach out and leave an imprint on online activities—a revelation that is as surprising as stumbling upon a rare gem in a pile of statistical rubble.
In summary, our study offers a breath of fresh air, or perhaps a lungful of polluted air, to the scholarly literature by unearthing this curious and unexpected correlation. It invites further inquiry into the sociocultural impact of environmental factors on digital behavior, serving as a reminder that the unseen forces of air pollution can extend beyond mere physical health to influence the ethereal realms of digital discourse.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study exhibit a robust and significant association between air pollution levels in Lafayette, Louisiana, and the average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos. Our findings align with previous research by Smith et al. (2018) and Doe and Jones (2020), who illuminated the weighty impact of air pollution on health and economic burdens, respectively. Just as a tangled Sierpinski triangle reveals intricate patterns, our study unearthed a surprisingly strong correlation, highlighting the interconnectedness of air quality and online engagement.

Drawing from the humorous yet thought-provoking literature review, we gleaned insights from "The Smoggy Serenade" by P. Pollutant, a work that humorously depicts the resilience of the human spirit amidst environmental challenges. Our study, in a way, mirrors the unyielding spirit depicted in the fictional narrative, showcasing the unexpected interplay between air pollution and digital discourse. Furthermore, the musings of @CleanAirAdvocate and @PollutionPundit on social media provided whimsical yet intriguing perspectives, underscoring the multifaceted nature of the air pollution and online engagement nexus.

Our findings contribute to the growing body of evidence that suggests the influence of environmental factors extends beyond physical health and economic outcomes. It seems that even in the digital sphere, the tendrils of air pollution make their presence felt, akin to stumbling upon a rare gem in a pile of statistical rubble. With a correlation coefficient as striking as a perfectly executed joke, our study not only establishes a statistical connection but also alludes to the intriguing mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship.

In essence, this study serves as a lighthearted reminder that the whimsically tangled web of air pollution and online engagement merits further scholarly exploration. As we navigate this newfound connection, we are poised to unravel the unexpected threads that tie air quality and digital engagement, elevating the scholarly discourse with a breath of fresh, or perhaps slightly polluted, air.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Lafayette, Louisiana and Average number of comments on Vihart YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Lafayette's Lousy Air: Linking Air Pollution with Vihart's Video Views

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the association between air pollution levels in Lafayette, Louisiana, and the average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and YouTube analytics, we aimed to uncover any potential relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8172750 along with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2023. This intriguing connection prompts further exploration into the sociocultural implications of air quality on online engagement, shedding light on the air-ily amusing influence of environmental factors on digital discourse.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The impact of air pollution on human health and well-being has been a topic of great interest and concern for decades. With the rapid industrial development and urbanization, the quality of air has become a pertinent issue in many regions across the globe. While the detrimental effects of air pollution on physical health are well-documented, the potential influence of air quality on seemingly unrelated aspects of human life has not been extensively explored. In this study, we delve into the unexpected realm of digital engagement by examining the association between air pollution levels in Lafayette, Louisiana, and the average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos.
Vihart, a renowned creator on YouTube, is known for her engaging and educational content, often covering mathematical and artistic topics. Her channel has garnered a significant following, with an extensive and active community of viewers who express their thoughts through comments on her videos. Our curious investigation seeks to uncover the peculiar relationship between the air quality in Lafayette and the level of interaction and participation in discussions of Vihart's thought-provoking content.
Although on the surface, the connection between air pollution and YouTube engagement may appear as elusive as the probability of fitting an entire parabola into a Twitter post, our findings present a compelling correlation that may raise eyebrows and lead to unexpected revelations. Through rigorous data analysis and statistical modeling, we aim to shed light on this quirky correlation and its implications, while also injecting a dash of whimsy and curiosity into the realm of environmental and digital studies. This examination promises to provide a breath of fresh air, or perhaps polluted air, into the scholarly discourse on the intersection of environmental factors and online behavior.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8172750 between air pollution levels in Lafayette, Louisiana, and the average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos. This correlation was further substantiated by an r-squared value of 0.6679383, emphasizing the robustness of the relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 added a cherry on top of this statistical sundae, indicating a highly significant association that would make even the most skeptical statistician raise an intrigued eyebrow.
Figure 1 exhibits a scatterplot illustrating the noteworthy correlation between air pollution and Vihart's video engagement. One could say that the data points are as tightly packed as the confines of a stuffy room with poor ventilation, further emphasizing the strength of the correlation. The lighthearted observer might even discern a pattern resembling a smoggy cloud of data points, metaphorically encapsulating the hazy relationship between air quality and online interaction.
These findings not only provide quantitative support for the link between air pollution and digital engagement, but they also beckon for a deeper exploration of the underlying mechanisms driving this unexpected relationship. It appears that even in the digital realm, the noxious tendrils of air pollution can reach out and leave an imprint on online activities—a revelation that is as surprising as stumbling upon a rare gem in a pile of statistical rubble.
In summary, our study offers a breath of fresh air, or perhaps a lungful of polluted air, to the scholarly literature by unearthing this curious and unexpected correlation. It invites further inquiry into the sociocultural impact of environmental factors on digital behavior, serving as a reminder that the unseen forces of air pollution can extend beyond mere physical health to influence the ethereal realms of digital discourse.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

Our investigation into the curious connection between air pollution levels in Lafayette, Louisiana, and the average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos has uncovered a correlation that is as clear as a breath of fresh air—albeit one tinged with a hint of pollution. The statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables raises intriguing questions and tickles the scholarly fancy with its unexpected nature. It seems that the noxious fumes of air pollution can transcend physical boundaries to permeate the digital sphere, much like a persistent internet pop-up ad. This discovery, while humorous in its peculiarity, underscores the far-reaching impact of environmental factors on online engagement, rendering air pollution not only a threat to human health but also a player in the intricate dance of digital discourse. One might even say that our findings breathe new life into the field of environmental and digital studies, much like a gust of wind revitalizing a stale research topic.

In light of these revelations, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. These findings stand as a testament to the unexpected and whimsical nature of academic inquiry, serving as a reminder that even the most peculiar connections can unfold before our eyes. It is with this lighthearted yet firmly grounded sentiment that we conclude our investigation, leaving the door ajar for future research to explore equally delightful and surprising scholarship. After all, in the realm of academia, one can never predict when the next lighthearted revelation will emerge, much like stumbling upon a pun in the midst of a serious discussion.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Lafayette's Lousy Air: Linking Air Pollution with Vihart's Video Views. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Environmental Psychology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Lafayette's Lousy Air: Linking Air Pollution with Vihart's Video Views. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Whimsical Environmental Research and Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Lafayette's Lousy Air: Linking Air Pollution with Vihart's Video Views with an abstract of This paper investigates the association between air pollution levels in Lafayette, Louisiana, and the average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos. By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and YouTube analytics, we aimed to uncover any potential relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8172750 along with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2009 to 2023. This intriguing connection prompts further exploration into the sociocultural implications of air quality on online engagement, shedding light on the air-ily amusing influence of environmental factors on digital discourse.

ChatGPT:

Lafayette, Louisiana, air pollution, Vihart, YouTube, video comments, Environmental Protection Agency data, YouTube analytics, correlation coefficient, p-value, sociocultural implications, digital discourse

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Lafayette, Louisiana
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Lafayette, LA
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Lafayette, Louisiana

Average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Average number of comments on Vihart YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.8172750 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6679383 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 66.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Lafayette, Louisiana) over the 15 years from 2009 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0002. 0.0001989289472488420000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 0.02% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 5,027 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.52, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Air pollution in Lafayette, Louisiana (Bad air quality days)0.197260.5808220.4438360.3743170.397260.4065930.3205480.2158470.2821920.2712330.2328770.2493150.1835620.2712330.234432
Average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos (Average Comments)2254748.3332414040.874723.692146.862364.51715.892278.571263.821194.3324181595803.833918.25




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.19726,0.580822,0.443836,0.374317,0.39726,0.406593,0.320548,0.215847,0.282192,0.271233,0.232877,0.249315,0.183562,0.271233,0.234432,])
array_2 = np.array([225,4748.33,3241,4040.87,4723.69,2146.86,2364.5,1715.89,2278.57,1263.82,1194.33,2418,1595,803.833,918.25,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Lafayette, Louisiana"
array_2_name = "Average number of comments on Vihart's YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 4989 · Black Variable ID: 21665 · Red Variable ID: 25549
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0