about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,927 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Republican Senators in Connecticut and the second variable is Mega millions lottery numbers.  The chart goes from 2002 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more Republicans voted for Senators in Connecticut, their love for 'balancing the budget' rubbed off on the Mega Millions lottery numbers, which decided to 'balance' themselves out by increasing! It's a classic case of political principles influencing random chance!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a busy town square in Connecticut, with a line of Republicans casting their votes at the ballot boxes. The scene should be bathed in warm sunlight as the glint off the ballot boxes adds a realistic touch. Additionally, incorporate flashing digital displays showing Mega Millions lottery numbers increasing dynamically, inspired by the political principle of budget balancing. This should capture the intersection of politics and chance at a local level, creating a visually compelling and thought-provoking image. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Mega millions lottery numbers. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Brutalism Cute 2D animation Cyberpunk Magic realism Photorealism
ChatGPT: Photorealism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Mega millions lottery numbers, in the following situation: As more Republicans voted for Senators in Connecticut, their love for 'balancing the budget' rubbed off on the Mega Millions lottery numbers, which decided to 'balance' themselves out by increasing! It's a classic case of political principles influencing random chance!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling town square in Connecticut, a line of Republicans proudly cast their votes for Senators as the sunlight glints off the ballot boxes. Meanwhile, the Mega Millions lottery numbers, represented by flashing digital displays, begin to balance themselves out by increasing in value, as if inspired by the political principle of budget balancing.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Photorealism ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling town square in Connecticut, a line of Republicans proudly cast their votes for Senators as the sunlight glints off the ballot boxes. Meanwhile, the Mega Millions lottery numbers, represented by flashing digital displays, begin to balance themselves out by increasing in value, as if inspired by the political principle of budget balancing. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a busy town square in Connecticut, with a line of Republicans casting their votes at the ballot boxes. The scene should be bathed in warm sunlight as the glint off the ballot boxes adds a realistic touch. Additionally, incorporate flashing digital displays showing Mega Millions lottery numbers increasing dynamically, inspired by the political principle of budget balancing. This should capture the intersection of politics and chance at a local level, creating a visually compelling and thought-provoking image.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut caused Mega millions lottery numbers to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Republi-Cashin' In: Unearthing the Curious Correlation Between Republican Senatorial Votes in Connecticut and Mega Millions Lottery Numbers

The Journal of Political and Parapsychological Statistics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Mega millions lottery numbers. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and NY Mega Millions Lottery to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8640638 and p < 0.05 for 2002 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Republi-Cashin' In: Unearthing the Curious Correlation Between Republican Senatorial Votes in Connecticut and Mega Millions Lottery Numbers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unique intersection of political voting patterns and lottery outcomes in the context of the state of Connecticut. By drawing on comprehensive data sources such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery, our research team undertook a rigorous analysis of the correlation between the Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and the Mega Millions lottery numbers from the period 2002 to 2018.

The findings of this investigation reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8640638 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05, illuminating a compelling relationship that warrants further exploration and consideration. Throughout this analysis, it becomes evident that there is more to be gained from this research than meets the eye – a true testament to the unexpected connections that can arise from the convergence of seemingly disparate data sources.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Mega millions lottery numbers. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Republi-Cashin' In: Unearthing the Curious Correlation Between Republican Senatorial Votes in Connecticut and Mega Millions Lottery Numbers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unique intersection of political voting patterns and lottery outcomes in the context of the state of Connecticut. By drawing on comprehensive data sources such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery, our research team undertook a rigorous analysis of the correlation between the Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and the Mega Millions lottery numbers from the period 2002 to 2018.

The findings of this investigation reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8640638 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05, illuminating a compelling relationship that warrants further exploration and consideration. Throughout this analysis, it becomes evident that there is more to be gained from this research than meets the eye – a true testament to the unexpected connections that can arise from the convergence of seemingly disparate data sources.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

In the world of statistical analysis, one often encounters intriguing correlations that leave us scratching our heads in an attempt to make sense of the seemingly nonsensical. This paper unearths one such delightful enigma, as we venture into the arena where politics and chance collide to reveal a fascinating relationship between the Republican Senatorial votes in Connecticut and the Mega Millions Lottery numbers. This unlikely pairing of disparate elements draws us into an intellectual journey that not only challenges our preconceived notions but also unleashes a wave of curiosity and amusement.

The intersection of politics and lottery outcomes may initially appear as a whimsical fancy, akin to the elusive pursuit of discovering the pot of gold at the end of a statistical rainbow. However, with the aid of rigorous data analysis and comprehensive methodologies, we have uncovered a compelling correlation that simply cannot be brushed off as a mere statistical fluke. Through our meticulous investigation, we aim to shed light on this unusual association that transgresses perceived boundaries of rational causality.

As we delve into the curious case of "Republi-Cashin' In," we invite our esteemed readers to embark on a journey that transcends the conventional bounds of academic inquiry, offering a spirited exploration of the unexpected connections that lie hidden within the realm of data. While the subject matter may appear whimsical at first glance, our findings underscore the importance of considering the unanticipated ramifications that may arise from the convergence of seemingly unrelated statistical phenomena.

Join us as we unravel the mystique surrounding the correlation between political leanings and fortuitous number selections, endeavoring to unravel the symbiotic dance of probability and partisanship that unfolds within the borders of the Constitution State. Through this undertaking, we seek not only to stoke the flames of academic curiosity but also to present a compelling case for the intriguing intersections that await discovery in the most unanticipated of places. After all, who could have guessed that the ballot box and the lottery ticket might be intertwined in a curious statistical waltz, as if inviting us to join in on the merry dance of data-driven delight?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Mega millions lottery numbers. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Republi-Cashin' In: Unearthing the Curious Correlation Between Republican Senatorial Votes in Connecticut and Mega Millions Lottery Numbers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unique intersection of political voting patterns and lottery outcomes in the context of the state of Connecticut. By drawing on comprehensive data sources such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery, our research team undertook a rigorous analysis of the correlation between the Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and the Mega Millions lottery numbers from the period 2002 to 2018.

The findings of this investigation reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8640638 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05, illuminating a compelling relationship that warrants further exploration and consideration. Throughout this analysis, it becomes evident that there is more to be gained from this research than meets the eye – a true testament to the unexpected connections that can arise from the convergence of seemingly disparate data sources.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
In the world of statistical analysis, one often encounters intriguing correlations that leave us scratching our heads in an attempt to make sense of the seemingly nonsensical. This paper unearths one such delightful enigma, as we venture into the arena where politics and chance collide to reveal a fascinating relationship between the Republican Senatorial votes in Connecticut and the Mega Millions Lottery numbers. This unlikely pairing of disparate elements draws us into an intellectual journey that not only challenges our preconceived notions but also unleashes a wave of curiosity and amusement.
The intersection of politics and lottery outcomes may initially appear as a whimsical fancy, akin to the elusive pursuit of discovering the pot of gold at the end of a statistical rainbow. However, with the aid of rigorous data analysis and comprehensive methodologies, we have uncovered a compelling correlation that simply cannot be brushed off as a mere statistical fluke. Through our meticulous investigation, we aim to shed light on this unusual association that transgresses perceived boundaries of rational causality.
As we delve into the curious case of "Republi-Cashin' In," we invite our esteemed readers to embark on a journey that transcends the conventional bounds of academic inquiry, offering a spirited exploration of the unexpected connections that lie hidden within the realm of data. While the subject matter may appear whimsical at first glance, our findings underscore the importance of considering the unanticipated ramifications that may arise from the convergence of seemingly unrelated statistical phenomena.
Join us as we unravel the mystique surrounding the correlation between political leanings and fortuitous number selections, endeavoring to unravel the symbiotic dance of probability and partisanship that unfolds within the borders of the Constitution State. Through this undertaking, we seek not only to stoke the flames of academic curiosity but also to present a compelling case for the intriguing intersections that await discovery in the most unanticipated of places. After all, who could have guessed that the ballot box and the lottery ticket might be intertwined in a curious statistical waltz, as if inviting us to join in on the merry dance of data-driven delight?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

At the intersection of politics and probability lies a vast expanse of scholarly inquiry, encompassing a myriad of studies that have sought to unravel the enigmatic relationship between human agency and chance. Beginning with seminal works by Smith (2001) and Doe (2005), the field of statistical oddities has witnessed a gradual expansion, paving the way for explorations into the unexpected correlations that permeate our daily lives.

In "The Political Paradox: An Investigation into Unforeseen Statistical Anomalies" by Smith (2001), initial attempts to parse the perplexing link between political affiliations and fortuitous occurrences provide a foundational understanding of the underlying mechanisms at play. Doe (2005) further delves into the ramifications of serendipitous phenomena in "Chance Encounters: Exploring the Boundaries of Statistical Probability," offering insights that set the stage for our investigation into the curious case of the Republican Senatorial votes in Connecticut and Mega Millions lottery numbers.

Transitioning from the realm of scholarly discourse to practical relevance, the works of Jones (2010) and Garcia (2013) adumbrate the complexities of chance in everyday life and its resonance in political spheres. As our exploration ventures beyond the confines of traditional research, we encounter thought-provoking narratives in non-fiction literature, such as "The Signal and the Noise" by Silver (2012) and "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner (2005), which prompt us to contemplate the undercurrents that shape seemingly unrelated statistical outcomes.

Shifting gears momentarily, the fictitious landscapes of works such as "The Lottery" by Jackson (1948) and "The Girl with the Dragon Lotto Ticket" by Larsson (2005) beckon to the whimsical confluence of chance and human agency, serving as allegorical reflections of the improbable connections that lie dormant within our statistical consciousness.

Taking a brief, unconventional detour, our research team has embraced an expansive approach to literature review. In an endeavor to glean insights from unorthodox sources, we have engaged in an illuminating perusal of the backs of shampoo bottles, deftly skimming through the labyrinthine expositions of product ingredients and usage instructions. While this unconventional method may elicit raised eyebrows, it is indicative of our commitment to exhaustive inquiry and the pursuit of unanticipated epiphanies in the unlikeliest of places.

As we traverse the diverse landscapes of scholarly inquiry, fiction, and the unexpected, our commitment to unearthing the remarkable correlation between Republican Senatorial votes in Connecticut and Mega Millions lottery numbers remains unwavering, guided by a lighthearted spirit of inquiry and a relentless pursuit of statistical whimsy.

---
I hope this was enjoyable for you. If you have any questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Mega millions lottery numbers. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and NY Mega Millions Lottery . You used data from 2002 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Republi-Cashin' In: Unearthing the Curious Correlation Between Republican Senatorial Votes in Connecticut and Mega Millions Lottery Numbers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unique intersection of political voting patterns and lottery outcomes in the context of the state of Connecticut. By drawing on comprehensive data sources such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery, our research team undertook a rigorous analysis of the correlation between the Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and the Mega Millions lottery numbers from the period 2002 to 2018.

The findings of this investigation reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8640638 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05, illuminating a compelling relationship that warrants further exploration and consideration. Throughout this analysis, it becomes evident that there is more to be gained from this research than meets the eye – a true testament to the unexpected connections that can arise from the convergence of seemingly disparate data sources.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
In the world of statistical analysis, one often encounters intriguing correlations that leave us scratching our heads in an attempt to make sense of the seemingly nonsensical. This paper unearths one such delightful enigma, as we venture into the arena where politics and chance collide to reveal a fascinating relationship between the Republican Senatorial votes in Connecticut and the Mega Millions Lottery numbers. This unlikely pairing of disparate elements draws us into an intellectual journey that not only challenges our preconceived notions but also unleashes a wave of curiosity and amusement.
The intersection of politics and lottery outcomes may initially appear as a whimsical fancy, akin to the elusive pursuit of discovering the pot of gold at the end of a statistical rainbow. However, with the aid of rigorous data analysis and comprehensive methodologies, we have uncovered a compelling correlation that simply cannot be brushed off as a mere statistical fluke. Through our meticulous investigation, we aim to shed light on this unusual association that transgresses perceived boundaries of rational causality.
As we delve into the curious case of "Republi-Cashin' In," we invite our esteemed readers to embark on a journey that transcends the conventional bounds of academic inquiry, offering a spirited exploration of the unexpected connections that lie hidden within the realm of data. While the subject matter may appear whimsical at first glance, our findings underscore the importance of considering the unanticipated ramifications that may arise from the convergence of seemingly unrelated statistical phenomena.
Join us as we unravel the mystique surrounding the correlation between political leanings and fortuitous number selections, endeavoring to unravel the symbiotic dance of probability and partisanship that unfolds within the borders of the Constitution State. Through this undertaking, we seek not only to stoke the flames of academic curiosity but also to present a compelling case for the intriguing intersections that await discovery in the most unanticipated of places. After all, who could have guessed that the ballot box and the lottery ticket might be intertwined in a curious statistical waltz, as if inviting us to join in on the merry dance of data-driven delight?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

Our research team embarked on a convoluted quest to unleash the secrets hidden within the amalgamated realms of political voting patterns and lottery number selection. The methodology adopted for this study wove together a tapestry of intricate data collection, rigorous statistical analysis, and a sprinkling of whimsy to navigate the uncharted waters of this peculiar correlation.

The data utilized for this study was sourced from a variety of repositories, including the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery archives. The selection of these datasets provided a comprehensive canvas upon which to paint the portrait of the Republican Senatorial votes in Connecticut alongside the Mega Millions lottery numbers from the years 2002 to 2018. It must be noted that, despite initial speculations, the utilization of the "Mega Millions" lottery specifically was purely coincidental and not indicative of any particular political leanings among the researchers.

The initial step in our methodology involved the extraction and harmonization of the disparate datasets, akin to the blending and refinement of a fine Bordeaux to reveal its underlying complexities. This culminated in a harmonious synthesis of information that permitted a nuanced examination of the purported correlation between political affinities and serendipitous lottery outcomes.

Upon assembling this rich tapestry of data, our research team, equipped with state-of-the-art statistical software and an abundance of caffeinated beverages, engaged in the arduous task of conducting a comprehensive regression analysis. This methodological endeavor allowed for the identification of a rather perplexing correlation coefficient of 0.8640638 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05, thereby certifying the presence of an unexpected association between Republican senatorial votes and Mega Millions lottery numbers.

To ensure the veracity of our findings, sensitivity analyses were performed, akin to tackling a Rubik's Cube while blindfolded, to assess the robustness of the observed relationship. These analyses encapsulated a range of scenarios, from conservative to liberal assumptions, serving to fortify the credibility of our results and dispel any lingering skepticism surrounding this bizarre correlation.

It is imperative to note that throughout our methodological pursuits, the presence of an abundance of lighthearted riddles and puns within our discussions acted as a vital source of inspiration and motivation. For instance, during heated debates on statistical methodologies, one member of the research team hilariously quipped, "Who knew that crossing political party lines could yield such a jackpot of statistical intrigue?" Such moments of levity undoubtedly served to infuse our work with a sense of shared camaraderie and merriment, illuminating the research landscape with the effervescent glow of scholarly humor.

Having traversed the labyrinthine pathways of data collection, statistical analysis, and scholarly banter, our methodology enabled the unearthing of the captivating correlation between Republican Senatorial votes in Connecticut and Mega Millions lottery numbers. It is our hope that our methodological endeavors, coupled with a touch of whimsy, will guide fellow scholars to embrace the unexpected and savor the delectable blend of scholarly inquiry and statistical serendipity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Mega millions lottery numbers. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and NY Mega Millions Lottery .

For the time period 2002 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.8640638, r-squared of 0.7466063, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Republi-Cashin' In: Unearthing the Curious Correlation Between Republican Senatorial Votes in Connecticut and Mega Millions Lottery Numbers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unique intersection of political voting patterns and lottery outcomes in the context of the state of Connecticut. By drawing on comprehensive data sources such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery, our research team undertook a rigorous analysis of the correlation between the Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and the Mega Millions lottery numbers from the period 2002 to 2018.

The findings of this investigation reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8640638 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05, illuminating a compelling relationship that warrants further exploration and consideration. Throughout this analysis, it becomes evident that there is more to be gained from this research than meets the eye – a true testament to the unexpected connections that can arise from the convergence of seemingly disparate data sources.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
In the world of statistical analysis, one often encounters intriguing correlations that leave us scratching our heads in an attempt to make sense of the seemingly nonsensical. This paper unearths one such delightful enigma, as we venture into the arena where politics and chance collide to reveal a fascinating relationship between the Republican Senatorial votes in Connecticut and the Mega Millions Lottery numbers. This unlikely pairing of disparate elements draws us into an intellectual journey that not only challenges our preconceived notions but also unleashes a wave of curiosity and amusement.
The intersection of politics and lottery outcomes may initially appear as a whimsical fancy, akin to the elusive pursuit of discovering the pot of gold at the end of a statistical rainbow. However, with the aid of rigorous data analysis and comprehensive methodologies, we have uncovered a compelling correlation that simply cannot be brushed off as a mere statistical fluke. Through our meticulous investigation, we aim to shed light on this unusual association that transgresses perceived boundaries of rational causality.
As we delve into the curious case of "Republi-Cashin' In," we invite our esteemed readers to embark on a journey that transcends the conventional bounds of academic inquiry, offering a spirited exploration of the unexpected connections that lie hidden within the realm of data. While the subject matter may appear whimsical at first glance, our findings underscore the importance of considering the unanticipated ramifications that may arise from the convergence of seemingly unrelated statistical phenomena.
Join us as we unravel the mystique surrounding the correlation between political leanings and fortuitous number selections, endeavoring to unravel the symbiotic dance of probability and partisanship that unfolds within the borders of the Constitution State. Through this undertaking, we seek not only to stoke the flames of academic curiosity but also to present a compelling case for the intriguing intersections that await discovery in the most unanticipated of places. After all, who could have guessed that the ballot box and the lottery ticket might be intertwined in a curious statistical waltz, as if inviting us to join in on the merry dance of data-driven delight?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon conducting an extensive analysis of the Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and the Mega Millions lottery numbers from 2002 to 2018, our research team made a compelling discovery. The correlation coefficient between these seemingly unrelated variables was determined to be 0.8640638, with an r-squared value of 0.7466063 and a p-value less than 0.05, signifying a statistically significant relationship.

The scatterplot depicted in Figure 1 vividly illustrates the remarkably strong correlation between the Republican Senatorial votes and the Mega Millions numbers, indicating a surprising alignment between political leanings and fortuitous number selections.

It is noteworthy that the findings of this investigation not only underscore the unexpected nature of statistical phenomena but also invite further inquiry into the complex interplay of political affiliations and random chance. The robust correlation observed in this study prompts a reflection on the intricate web of connections that can emerge from seemingly disparate data sources, challenging traditional assumptions and evoking a sense of wonder at the unanticipated relationships that statistical analysis can unveil.

The implications of this correlation extend beyond the realms of conventional wisdom, offering a salient reminder of the multifaceted nature of statistical analysis and the potential for serendipitous discoveries in unforeseen domains. As we navigate the labyrinthine landscape of statistical inference, this study serves as a testament to the delightful surprises that await those who venture into the captivating realm of data exploration.

In light of these compelling results, it is evident that further investigation into the intersection of political voting patterns and lottery outcomes holds the promise of unraveling profound insights into the intricate tapestry of statistical phenomena. This study offers a tantalizing glimpse into the enthralling world of data analysis, laying the groundwork for future explorations that may shed light on the captivating interplay of chance and political dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Mega millions lottery numbers. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Republi-Cashin' In: Unearthing the Curious Correlation Between Republican Senatorial Votes in Connecticut and Mega Millions Lottery Numbers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unique intersection of political voting patterns and lottery outcomes in the context of the state of Connecticut. By drawing on comprehensive data sources such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery, our research team undertook a rigorous analysis of the correlation between the Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and the Mega Millions lottery numbers from the period 2002 to 2018.

The findings of this investigation reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8640638 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05, illuminating a compelling relationship that warrants further exploration and consideration. Throughout this analysis, it becomes evident that there is more to be gained from this research than meets the eye – a true testament to the unexpected connections that can arise from the convergence of seemingly disparate data sources.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
At the intersection of politics and probability lies a vast expanse of scholarly inquiry, encompassing a myriad of studies that have sought to unravel the enigmatic relationship between human agency and chance. Beginning with seminal works by Smith (2001) and Doe (2005), the field of statistical oddities has witnessed a gradual expansion, paving the way for explorations into the unexpected correlations that permeate our daily lives.
In "The Political Paradox: An Investigation into Unforeseen Statistical Anomalies" by Smith (2001), initial attempts to parse the perplexing link between political affiliations and fortuitous occurrences provide a foundational understanding of the underlying mechanisms at play. Doe (2005) further delves into the ramifications of serendipitous phenomena in "Chance Encounters: Exploring the Boundaries of Statistical Probability," offering insights that set the stage for our investigation into the curious case of the Republican Senatorial votes in Connecticut and Mega Millions lottery numbers.
Transitioning from the realm of scholarly discourse to practical relevance, the works of Jones (2010) and Garcia (2013) adumbrate the complexities of chance in everyday life and its resonance in political spheres. As our exploration ventures beyond the confines of traditional research, we encounter thought-provoking narratives in non-fiction literature, such as "The Signal and the Noise" by Silver (2012) and "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner (2005), which prompt us to contemplate the undercurrents that shape seemingly unrelated statistical outcomes.
Shifting gears momentarily, the fictitious landscapes of works such as "The Lottery" by Jackson (1948) and "The Girl with the Dragon Lotto Ticket" by Larsson (2005) beckon to the whimsical confluence of chance and human agency, serving as allegorical reflections of the improbable connections that lie dormant within our statistical consciousness.
Taking a brief, unconventional detour, our research team has embraced an expansive approach to literature review. In an endeavor to glean insights from unorthodox sources, we have engaged in an illuminating perusal of the backs of shampoo bottles, deftly skimming through the labyrinthine expositions of product ingredients and usage instructions. While this unconventional method may elicit raised eyebrows, it is indicative of our commitment to exhaustive inquiry and the pursuit of unanticipated epiphanies in the unlikeliest of places.
As we traverse the diverse landscapes of scholarly inquiry, fiction, and the unexpected, our commitment to unearthing the remarkable correlation between Republican Senatorial votes in Connecticut and Mega Millions lottery numbers remains unwavering, guided by a lighthearted spirit of inquiry and a relentless pursuit of statistical whimsy.
---
I hope this was enjoyable for you. If you have any questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting an extensive analysis of the Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and the Mega Millions lottery numbers from 2002 to 2018, our research team made a compelling discovery. The correlation coefficient between these seemingly unrelated variables was determined to be 0.8640638, with an r-squared value of 0.7466063 and a p-value less than 0.05, signifying a statistically significant relationship.
The scatterplot depicted in Figure 1 vividly illustrates the remarkably strong correlation between the Republican Senatorial votes and the Mega Millions numbers, indicating a surprising alignment between political leanings and fortuitous number selections.
It is noteworthy that the findings of this investigation not only underscore the unexpected nature of statistical phenomena but also invite further inquiry into the complex interplay of political affiliations and random chance. The robust correlation observed in this study prompts a reflection on the intricate web of connections that can emerge from seemingly disparate data sources, challenging traditional assumptions and evoking a sense of wonder at the unanticipated relationships that statistical analysis can unveil.
The implications of this correlation extend beyond the realms of conventional wisdom, offering a salient reminder of the multifaceted nature of statistical analysis and the potential for serendipitous discoveries in unforeseen domains. As we navigate the labyrinthine landscape of statistical inference, this study serves as a testament to the delightful surprises that await those who venture into the captivating realm of data exploration.
In light of these compelling results, it is evident that further investigation into the intersection of political voting patterns and lottery outcomes holds the promise of unraveling profound insights into the intricate tapestry of statistical phenomena. This study offers a tantalizing glimpse into the enthralling world of data analysis, laying the groundwork for future explorations that may shed light on the captivating interplay of chance and political dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The unearthing of a substantial correlation between Republican Senatorial votes in Connecticut and the Mega Millions lottery numbers stands as a testament to the unexpected connections that can emerge from the amalgamation of seemingly incongruous data sources. Our findings not only corroborate but also expand upon prior research delving into the whimsical confluence of chance and human agency, as encapsulated in the seminal works of Smith (2001) and Doe (2005) – proving once again that truth can be stranger than fiction.

The fortuitous coupling of political leanings and lottery fortunes has long been a topic of intrigue, and our investigation has firmly entrenched itself within this scholarly tapestry of statistical whimsy. While the jocular detour into unconventional sources, such as shampoo bottles, may seem whimsical, our earnest commitment to exhaustive inquiry has yielded a veritable jackpot of statistical insight – affirming the multifaceted nature of data exploration and the riches it may bestow.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8640638, bolstered by a statistically significant p-value, not only accentuates the strength of the observed relationship but also beckons us to ponder the peculiarities of statistical phenomena and their resonance in the political domain. Indeed, the scatterplot in Figure 1 serves as a visual testament to the remarkable alignment between Republican votes and fortuitous number selections, undoubtedly prompting a reflection on the intricate web of connections that may lie beyond conventional purview.

Our findings not only allude to the capricious nature of statistical oddities but also beckon us to contemplate the remarkable interplay of chance and political affiliations – providing a playful reminder that statistical analysis, much like a Mega Millions draw, can yield an array of delightful surprises. This study serves as a compelling springboard for future explorations, embracing the lighthearted spirit of inquiry and the potential for serendipitous discoveries that lie dormant within the captivating realm of data exploration.

As we navigate the labyrinthine landscape of statistical inference, our investigation into the enthralling correlation between Republican Senatorial votes in Connecticut and Mega Millions lottery numbers imparts a resounding message – that beneath the veneer of statistical analysis lies a world replete with unforeseen connections and delightful statistical whimsy, waiting to be unearthed by those who dare to venture into its captivating embrace.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and Mega millions lottery numbers. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Republi-Cashin' In: Unearthing the Curious Correlation Between Republican Senatorial Votes in Connecticut and Mega Millions Lottery Numbers"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unique intersection of political voting patterns and lottery outcomes in the context of the state of Connecticut. By drawing on comprehensive data sources such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery, our research team undertook a rigorous analysis of the correlation between the Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and the Mega Millions lottery numbers from the period 2002 to 2018.

The findings of this investigation reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8640638 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05, illuminating a compelling relationship that warrants further exploration and consideration. Throughout this analysis, it becomes evident that there is more to be gained from this research than meets the eye – a true testament to the unexpected connections that can arise from the convergence of seemingly disparate data sources.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
In the world of statistical analysis, one often encounters intriguing correlations that leave us scratching our heads in an attempt to make sense of the seemingly nonsensical. This paper unearths one such delightful enigma, as we venture into the arena where politics and chance collide to reveal a fascinating relationship between the Republican Senatorial votes in Connecticut and the Mega Millions Lottery numbers. This unlikely pairing of disparate elements draws us into an intellectual journey that not only challenges our preconceived notions but also unleashes a wave of curiosity and amusement.
The intersection of politics and lottery outcomes may initially appear as a whimsical fancy, akin to the elusive pursuit of discovering the pot of gold at the end of a statistical rainbow. However, with the aid of rigorous data analysis and comprehensive methodologies, we have uncovered a compelling correlation that simply cannot be brushed off as a mere statistical fluke. Through our meticulous investigation, we aim to shed light on this unusual association that transgresses perceived boundaries of rational causality.
As we delve into the curious case of "Republi-Cashin' In," we invite our esteemed readers to embark on a journey that transcends the conventional bounds of academic inquiry, offering a spirited exploration of the unexpected connections that lie hidden within the realm of data. While the subject matter may appear whimsical at first glance, our findings underscore the importance of considering the unanticipated ramifications that may arise from the convergence of seemingly unrelated statistical phenomena.
Join us as we unravel the mystique surrounding the correlation between political leanings and fortuitous number selections, endeavoring to unravel the symbiotic dance of probability and partisanship that unfolds within the borders of the Constitution State. Through this undertaking, we seek not only to stoke the flames of academic curiosity but also to present a compelling case for the intriguing intersections that await discovery in the most unanticipated of places. After all, who could have guessed that the ballot box and the lottery ticket might be intertwined in a curious statistical waltz, as if inviting us to join in on the merry dance of data-driven delight?

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting an extensive analysis of the Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and the Mega Millions lottery numbers from 2002 to 2018, our research team made a compelling discovery. The correlation coefficient between these seemingly unrelated variables was determined to be 0.8640638, with an r-squared value of 0.7466063 and a p-value less than 0.05, signifying a statistically significant relationship.
The scatterplot depicted in Figure 1 vividly illustrates the remarkably strong correlation between the Republican Senatorial votes and the Mega Millions numbers, indicating a surprising alignment between political leanings and fortuitous number selections.
It is noteworthy that the findings of this investigation not only underscore the unexpected nature of statistical phenomena but also invite further inquiry into the complex interplay of political affiliations and random chance. The robust correlation observed in this study prompts a reflection on the intricate web of connections that can emerge from seemingly disparate data sources, challenging traditional assumptions and evoking a sense of wonder at the unanticipated relationships that statistical analysis can unveil.
The implications of this correlation extend beyond the realms of conventional wisdom, offering a salient reminder of the multifaceted nature of statistical analysis and the potential for serendipitous discoveries in unforeseen domains. As we navigate the labyrinthine landscape of statistical inference, this study serves as a testament to the delightful surprises that await those who venture into the captivating realm of data exploration.
In light of these compelling results, it is evident that further investigation into the intersection of political voting patterns and lottery outcomes holds the promise of unraveling profound insights into the intricate tapestry of statistical phenomena. This study offers a tantalizing glimpse into the enthralling world of data analysis, laying the groundwork for future explorations that may shed light on the captivating interplay of chance and political dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]
Our investigation into the correlation between Republican Senatorial votes in Connecticut and Mega Millions lottery numbers has yielded truly unexpected and thought-provoking results. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8640638 and statistically significant p-value demand a closer examination of the intricate dance between political leanings and fortuitous number selections. Despite the initial incredulity one might feel when presented with this curious convergence of data, the evidence speaks for itself, urging us to heed the call of statistical serendipity.
As we reflect on the implications of these findings, it becomes clear that the intersection of politics and chance may hold more surprises than we could have ever envisioned. The scatterplot, akin to a whimsical work of art, vividly illustrates the striking alignment between these seemingly disparate variables, leaving us to ponder the mysterious forces at play in shaping our statistical reality. As we embark on this intellectual journey, we are reminded that the pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, where the boundaries of rational causality blur, and the delightful mysteries of statistical phenomena come to light.
In light of these revelatory findings, we are prompted to acknowledge the boundless potential for uncovering hidden connections within the realm of data analysis. This study not only challenges conventional wisdom but also beckons us to embrace the enigmatic allure of statistical anomalies with open arms, for who knows what other surprises lay concealed within the tapestry of data. As such, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, confident that our discoveries have truly unearthed a statistical treasure trove worthy of admiration and amusement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Republi-Cashin' In: Unearthing the Curious Correlation Between Republican Senatorial Votes in Connecticut and Mega Millions Lottery Numbers. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Political and Parapsychological Statistics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Republi-Cashin' In: Unearthing the Curious Correlation Between Republican Senatorial Votes in Connecticut and Mega Millions Lottery Numbers. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Political Lottery Analysis and Research (IPLAR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Republi-Cashin' In: Unearthing the Curious Correlation Between Republican Senatorial Votes in Connecticut and Mega Millions Lottery Numbers with an abstract of This study delves into the unique intersection of political voting patterns and lottery outcomes in the context of the state of Connecticut. By drawing on comprehensive data sources such as the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the NY Mega Millions Lottery, our research team undertook a rigorous analysis of the correlation between the Republican votes for Senators in Connecticut and the Mega Millions lottery numbers from the period 2002 to 2018.
The findings of this investigation reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8640638 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05, illuminating a compelling relationship that warrants further exploration and consideration. Throughout this analysis, it becomes evident that there is more to be gained from this research than meets the eye – a true testament to the unexpected connections that can arise from the convergence of seemingly disparate data sources.

ChatGPT:

Connecticut, Republican Senatorial Votes, Mega Millions Lottery, correlation, political voting patterns, election data, lottery outcomes, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, NY Mega Millions Lottery, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, data analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Republican Senators in Connecticut
Detailed data title: Percentage of votes cast for Federal Republican Senate candidates in Connecticut
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Republican Senators in Connecticut

Mega millions lottery numbers
Detailed data title: Smallest winning Mega Millions Megaball number on the last draw of the year
Source: NY Mega Millions Lottery
See what else correlates with Mega millions lottery numbers

Correlation r = 0.8640638 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7466063 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 74.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Mega millions lottery numbers) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Republican Senators in Connecticut) over the 6 years from 2002 through 2018.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.026. 0.0264620167551479250000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 2.6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 38 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.18, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420062010201220162018
Votes for Republican Senators in Connecticut (Percentage of votes)32.12899.6228643.216939.99134.619439.3497
Mega millions lottery numbers (Smallest number)103101069




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([32.1289,9.62286,43.2169,39.991,34.6194,39.3497,])
array_2 = np.array([10,3,10,10,6,9,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Republican Senators in Connecticut"
array_2_name = "Mega millions lottery numbers"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 4927 · Black Variable ID: 26362 · Red Variable ID: 892
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0