about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,921 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is US household spending on housing and the second variable is Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Utah.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As household spending on housing in the US increased, more people began investing in figurines of famous landmarks to decorate their homes. This inadvertently led to a surge in support for the Democratic candidate in Utah, as these figurines subliminally swayed voters with their tiny, liberal-leaning picket signs.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a cozy living room in a classic 1960s comic-book style, with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern. The scene depicts a family sitting together in Utah, surrounded by small figurines of famous landmarks like the Statue of Liberty and the Golden Gate Bridge. The shelves and mantel are adorned with these decorations, creating a warm and inviting atmosphere. In the background, a TV shows the Democratic candidate's campaign ads, and the family members are nodding along as they are subconsciously absorbed by the messaging. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: US household spending on housing and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Utah. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Cute cartoon Cybernetic art Magic realism
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both US household spending on housing and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Utah, in the following situation: As household spending on housing in the US increased, more people began investing in figurines of famous landmarks to decorate their homes. This inadvertently led to a surge in support for the Democratic candidate in Utah, as these figurines subliminally swayed voters with their tiny, liberal-leaning picket signs.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy living room in Utah, a family sits together, surrounded by figurines of famous landmarks such as the Statue of Liberty and the Golden Gate Bridge. The shelves and mantel are adorned with these small decorations, creating a warm and inviting atmosphere. In the background, a TV shows the Democratic candidate's campaign ads, with the family members nodding along as they subconsciously absorb the messaging.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy living room in Utah, a family sits together, surrounded by figurines of famous landmarks such as the Statue of Liberty and the Golden Gate Bridge. The shelves and mantel are adorned with these small decorations, creating a warm and inviting atmosphere. In the background, a TV shows the Democratic candidate's campaign ads, with the family members nodding along as they subconsciously absorb the messaging. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a cozy living room in a classic 1960s comic-book style, with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern. The scene depicts a family sitting together in Utah, surrounded by small figurines of famous landmarks like the Statue of Liberty and the Golden Gate Bridge. The shelves and mantel are adorned with these decorations, creating a warm and inviting atmosphere. In the background, a TV shows the Democratic candidate's campaign ads, and the family members are nodding along as they are subconsciously absorbed by the messaging.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in US household spending on housing caused Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Utah to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Home Is Where the Votes Are: A Correlational Study of US Household Spending on Housing and Democratic Presidential Voting Behavior in Utah

The Journal of Political Housing Economics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US household spending on housing and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Utah. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Labor Statistics and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9399175 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Home Is Where the Votes Are: A Correlational Study of US Household Spending on Housing and Democratic Presidential Voting Behavior in Utah"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we dive into the delightful world of statistical analysis to explore the intriguing relationship between US household spending on housing and votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in the unlikely setting of Utah. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we meticulously examined the spending habits of households and their voting inclinations over the years 2000 to 2020.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9399175 with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between household spending on housing and support for the Democratic candidate in Utah. Put simply, the more households invested in their abodes, the more inclined they were to cast their votes in favor of the Democratic nominee. It seems that when it comes to politics, home truly is where the heart – and the votes – are!

Speaking of homes, did you hear about the mathematician who was afraid of negative numbers? He'd stop at nothing to avoid them!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US household spending on housing and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Utah. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Home Is Where the Votes Are: A Correlational Study of US Household Spending on Housing and Democratic Presidential Voting Behavior in Utah"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we dive into the delightful world of statistical analysis to explore the intriguing relationship between US household spending on housing and votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in the unlikely setting of Utah. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we meticulously examined the spending habits of households and their voting inclinations over the years 2000 to 2020.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9399175 with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between household spending on housing and support for the Democratic candidate in Utah. Put simply, the more households invested in their abodes, the more inclined they were to cast their votes in favor of the Democratic nominee. It seems that when it comes to politics, home truly is where the heart – and the votes – are!

Speaking of homes, did you hear about the mathematician who was afraid of negative numbers? He'd stop at nothing to avoid them!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between household spending on housing and political behavior has long been a subject of interest and debate. In this study, we extend this inquiry to the unlikely political landscape of Utah, where the Democratic presidential candidate has historically faced an uphill battle. The underlying question we aim to answer is: does household spending on housing have any impact on the voting behavior of Utah residents? It’s almost like asking if throwing a house party can influence the outcome of an election – talk about a real estate of the union!

Utah, known for its stunning landscapes and conservative political leanings, serves as a fascinating setting to explore this connection. As we delve into the data, we cannot help but muse over the peculiar notion that housing expenditures, often associated with personal finances and lifestyle choices, would have any bearing on political preferences. It’s almost as improbable as finding a housing market that isn’t in a state of flux!

Our statistical analysis utilizes data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to examine household spending on housing, and complements this with election results from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. Analyzing trends from 2000 to 2020, we sought to identify any discernible patterns that could shed light on the relationship between housing investments and electoral behavior. It’s almost as if we’re playing a game of real estate roulette with voting intentions!

As we unravel the findings of this study, we hope to not only contribute to the academic discourse on the intricate interplay between social and economic factors in shaping political landscapes, but also to add a touch of humor and wonder to an often-staid field of inquiry. After all, who said statistical analyses couldn't be both enlightening and entertaining?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US household spending on housing and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Utah. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Home Is Where the Votes Are: A Correlational Study of US Household Spending on Housing and Democratic Presidential Voting Behavior in Utah"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we dive into the delightful world of statistical analysis to explore the intriguing relationship between US household spending on housing and votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in the unlikely setting of Utah. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we meticulously examined the spending habits of households and their voting inclinations over the years 2000 to 2020.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9399175 with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between household spending on housing and support for the Democratic candidate in Utah. Put simply, the more households invested in their abodes, the more inclined they were to cast their votes in favor of the Democratic nominee. It seems that when it comes to politics, home truly is where the heart – and the votes – are!

Speaking of homes, did you hear about the mathematician who was afraid of negative numbers? He'd stop at nothing to avoid them!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between household spending on housing and political behavior has long been a subject of interest and debate. In this study, we extend this inquiry to the unlikely political landscape of Utah, where the Democratic presidential candidate has historically faced an uphill battle. The underlying question we aim to answer is: does household spending on housing have any impact on the voting behavior of Utah residents? It’s almost like asking if throwing a house party can influence the outcome of an election – talk about a real estate of the union!
Utah, known for its stunning landscapes and conservative political leanings, serves as a fascinating setting to explore this connection. As we delve into the data, we cannot help but muse over the peculiar notion that housing expenditures, often associated with personal finances and lifestyle choices, would have any bearing on political preferences. It’s almost as improbable as finding a housing market that isn’t in a state of flux!
Our statistical analysis utilizes data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to examine household spending on housing, and complements this with election results from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. Analyzing trends from 2000 to 2020, we sought to identify any discernible patterns that could shed light on the relationship between housing investments and electoral behavior. It’s almost as if we’re playing a game of real estate roulette with voting intentions!
As we unravel the findings of this study, we hope to not only contribute to the academic discourse on the intricate interplay between social and economic factors in shaping political landscapes, but also to add a touch of humor and wonder to an often-staid field of inquiry. After all, who said statistical analyses couldn't be both enlightening and entertaining?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Previous research has uncovered notable associations between household spending and voting behavior in the United States. Smith and Doe (2015) found a positive correlation between discretionary spending on housing and political party affiliation, while Jones et al. (2018) reported similar trends in their examination of regional voting patterns. These studies provide a solid foundation for exploring the relationship between housing expenditures and political preferences, even if the results are, dare I say it, rather house-predictable.

Speaking of houses, did you hear about the claustrophobic astronaut? He just needed a little space.

In "Housing Economics: Theory and Policy," the authors explore the intricate dynamics of housing markets and their broader impact on societal trends. The intersection of housing economics and political behavior has been a subject of increasing interest, prompting researchers to probe the nuances of household spending patterns in relation to electoral choices. It's almost as if the housing market is the stage, and political preferences are the players in a dramatic and unpredictable real estate opera!

In a more fictitious realm, the correlation between housing investments and voting behavior could be likened to the gripping narratives of "House of Cards" and "The Godfather." These fictional masterpieces invite us to contemplate the intricate power dynamics and alliances formed within the confines of familial homes, drawing eerie parallels to the nuances of political affiliations. Just as Frank Underwood manipulates the levers of power in the world of politics, households manipulate the levers of spending in the realm of housing. It's almost as if the real estate market is a high-stakes game, and votes are the ultimate currency!

On a more cinematic note, the subtle influence of housing expenditures on political preferences is reminiscent of the screen adaptation of "The Great Gatsby." The allure of grandeur and opulence, often associated with lavish residences, mirrors the allure of political ideologies in shaping voter sentiments. As Gatsby's mansion symbolizes both prosperity and moral decay, perhaps households' housing investments serve as symbolic reflections of their political inclinations. It's almost as if households are casting their votes not just at the ballot box, but with every brick and mortar they purchase!

In "The Big Short" and "Margin Call," the dynamics of housing markets and financial investments are explored with a sense of urgency and suspense, akin to the excitement of unraveling the ties between housing spending and electoral turns. Just as in the high-stakes world of finance, the intertwining of housing economics and political preferences presents a web of interconnected interests and motivations, ready to be unearthed with statistical rigor. It's almost as if the housing market is a complex puzzle, and political preferences are the missing pieces waiting to be uncovered!

But let's not forget that we're still discussing the findings of a study - perhaps correlations aren't just a type of association, but also a form of humor reserved for the statistically inclined.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US household spending on housing and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Utah. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 2000 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Home Is Where the Votes Are: A Correlational Study of US Household Spending on Housing and Democratic Presidential Voting Behavior in Utah"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we dive into the delightful world of statistical analysis to explore the intriguing relationship between US household spending on housing and votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in the unlikely setting of Utah. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we meticulously examined the spending habits of households and their voting inclinations over the years 2000 to 2020.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9399175 with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between household spending on housing and support for the Democratic candidate in Utah. Put simply, the more households invested in their abodes, the more inclined they were to cast their votes in favor of the Democratic nominee. It seems that when it comes to politics, home truly is where the heart – and the votes – are!

Speaking of homes, did you hear about the mathematician who was afraid of negative numbers? He'd stop at nothing to avoid them!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between household spending on housing and political behavior has long been a subject of interest and debate. In this study, we extend this inquiry to the unlikely political landscape of Utah, where the Democratic presidential candidate has historically faced an uphill battle. The underlying question we aim to answer is: does household spending on housing have any impact on the voting behavior of Utah residents? It’s almost like asking if throwing a house party can influence the outcome of an election – talk about a real estate of the union!
Utah, known for its stunning landscapes and conservative political leanings, serves as a fascinating setting to explore this connection. As we delve into the data, we cannot help but muse over the peculiar notion that housing expenditures, often associated with personal finances and lifestyle choices, would have any bearing on political preferences. It’s almost as improbable as finding a housing market that isn’t in a state of flux!
Our statistical analysis utilizes data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to examine household spending on housing, and complements this with election results from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. Analyzing trends from 2000 to 2020, we sought to identify any discernible patterns that could shed light on the relationship between housing investments and electoral behavior. It’s almost as if we’re playing a game of real estate roulette with voting intentions!
As we unravel the findings of this study, we hope to not only contribute to the academic discourse on the intricate interplay between social and economic factors in shaping political landscapes, but also to add a touch of humor and wonder to an often-staid field of inquiry. After all, who said statistical analyses couldn't be both enlightening and entertaining?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the connection between US household spending on housing and votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in the unexpected realm of Utah, our research team embarked on an exhilarating journey filled with data collection, analytical acrobatics, and the occasional dad joke. Drawing from the hallowed halls of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the playful precincts of the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we harnessed a veritable treasure trove of information spanning the years 2000 to 2020.

Our investigation unfolded in three whimsically named stages: the "Census of Abodes," the "Ballot Box Boogie," and the "Statistical Spectacular." In the first stage, we gathered a plethora of housing-related expenditure data, including mortgage payments, property taxes, insurance, and utilities, from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our team members may have developed an unanticipated penchant for combing through housing figures, even quipping that they were getting a "roof" over their heads with this data.

For the "Ballot Box Boogie," we jazzed things up by procuring election results with a Democratic candidate focus from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. With an eye for detail sharper than a spiked punch at a housewarming party, we meticulously grouped Utah's voting data by precinct and presidential election year. Our team may have even entertained the idea of hosting a statistical soiree to celebrate these data discoveries, but alas, the party planning committee did not reach a consensus.

Now, onto the "Statistical Spectacular." Here, we unsheathed our arsenal of analytical tools, including the trusty Pearson correlation coefficient and a host of captivating regression models. Through a series of enthralling statistical gymnastics, we sought to unveil any potential relationships between household spending on housing and Democratic presidential voting behavior in Utah. It's almost as if our statistical inferences were performing a delicate political waltz across the data, gracefully twirling through correlation matrices and p-values with the finesse of a seasoned dance partner.

Joking about socialism is no laughing matter, unless everyone gets it!

We must note that our methodology displayed a level of rigor akin to a tango competition - with each step carefully choreographed to ensure the integrity and validity of our findings. As we divulge the results of our captivating statistical odyssey, we hope to not only shed light on the enigmatic nexus between housing expenditures and voting predilections but also to inject an element of whimsy into the often sobering world of research methodology. After all, who said statistical studies couldn't dazzle and delight like a good old-fashioned barn dance?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US household spending on housing and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Utah. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 2000 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9399175, r-squared of 0.8834449, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Home Is Where the Votes Are: A Correlational Study of US Household Spending on Housing and Democratic Presidential Voting Behavior in Utah"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we dive into the delightful world of statistical analysis to explore the intriguing relationship between US household spending on housing and votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in the unlikely setting of Utah. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we meticulously examined the spending habits of households and their voting inclinations over the years 2000 to 2020.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9399175 with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between household spending on housing and support for the Democratic candidate in Utah. Put simply, the more households invested in their abodes, the more inclined they were to cast their votes in favor of the Democratic nominee. It seems that when it comes to politics, home truly is where the heart – and the votes – are!

Speaking of homes, did you hear about the mathematician who was afraid of negative numbers? He'd stop at nothing to avoid them!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between household spending on housing and political behavior has long been a subject of interest and debate. In this study, we extend this inquiry to the unlikely political landscape of Utah, where the Democratic presidential candidate has historically faced an uphill battle. The underlying question we aim to answer is: does household spending on housing have any impact on the voting behavior of Utah residents? It’s almost like asking if throwing a house party can influence the outcome of an election – talk about a real estate of the union!
Utah, known for its stunning landscapes and conservative political leanings, serves as a fascinating setting to explore this connection. As we delve into the data, we cannot help but muse over the peculiar notion that housing expenditures, often associated with personal finances and lifestyle choices, would have any bearing on political preferences. It’s almost as improbable as finding a housing market that isn’t in a state of flux!
Our statistical analysis utilizes data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to examine household spending on housing, and complements this with election results from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. Analyzing trends from 2000 to 2020, we sought to identify any discernible patterns that could shed light on the relationship between housing investments and electoral behavior. It’s almost as if we’re playing a game of real estate roulette with voting intentions!
As we unravel the findings of this study, we hope to not only contribute to the academic discourse on the intricate interplay between social and economic factors in shaping political landscapes, but also to add a touch of humor and wonder to an often-staid field of inquiry. After all, who said statistical analyses couldn't be both enlightening and entertaining?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the relationship between US household spending on housing and votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in Utah revealed a remarkably strong correlation. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.9399175, with an impressive r-squared value of 0.8834449. Furthermore, the p-value was less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship between these variables. It's almost as if the housing market and political preferences were in a statistical tango – one step forward, and no backward tango-ing on p-values here!

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually portrays the robust correlation observed in our analysis. The plot elegantly illustrates how as household spending on housing increases, so does support for the Democratic nominee in Utah. It's as if the voters were saying, "We may live in a red state, but our housing preferences are feeling pretty blue!"

In line with these findings, it's clear that there is a compelling connection between US household spending on housing and voting behavior in Utah. This novel insight prompts us to ponder the question: does the roof over our heads influence the color of the political roof over the state? It's almost as if the voters are giving us a clue – "It's not just the slopes of the Wasatch Mountains that influence our decisions; it's also the slopes of our roofs!"

Overall, our study sheds light on an intriguing relationship that extends beyond the usual realms of political analysis and economic trends. It adds an unexpected twist to the narrative of political affiliations and housing investments, reminding us that in the world of statistical analysis, there's always room for a dad joke or two!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US household spending on housing and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Utah. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Home Is Where the Votes Are: A Correlational Study of US Household Spending on Housing and Democratic Presidential Voting Behavior in Utah"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we dive into the delightful world of statistical analysis to explore the intriguing relationship between US household spending on housing and votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in the unlikely setting of Utah. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we meticulously examined the spending habits of households and their voting inclinations over the years 2000 to 2020.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9399175 with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between household spending on housing and support for the Democratic candidate in Utah. Put simply, the more households invested in their abodes, the more inclined they were to cast their votes in favor of the Democratic nominee. It seems that when it comes to politics, home truly is where the heart – and the votes – are!

Speaking of homes, did you hear about the mathematician who was afraid of negative numbers? He'd stop at nothing to avoid them!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previous research has uncovered notable associations between household spending and voting behavior in the United States. Smith and Doe (2015) found a positive correlation between discretionary spending on housing and political party affiliation, while Jones et al. (2018) reported similar trends in their examination of regional voting patterns. These studies provide a solid foundation for exploring the relationship between housing expenditures and political preferences, even if the results are, dare I say it, rather house-predictable.
Speaking of houses, did you hear about the claustrophobic astronaut? He just needed a little space.
In "Housing Economics: Theory and Policy," the authors explore the intricate dynamics of housing markets and their broader impact on societal trends. The intersection of housing economics and political behavior has been a subject of increasing interest, prompting researchers to probe the nuances of household spending patterns in relation to electoral choices. It's almost as if the housing market is the stage, and political preferences are the players in a dramatic and unpredictable real estate opera!
In a more fictitious realm, the correlation between housing investments and voting behavior could be likened to the gripping narratives of "House of Cards" and "The Godfather." These fictional masterpieces invite us to contemplate the intricate power dynamics and alliances formed within the confines of familial homes, drawing eerie parallels to the nuances of political affiliations. Just as Frank Underwood manipulates the levers of power in the world of politics, households manipulate the levers of spending in the realm of housing. It's almost as if the real estate market is a high-stakes game, and votes are the ultimate currency!
On a more cinematic note, the subtle influence of housing expenditures on political preferences is reminiscent of the screen adaptation of "The Great Gatsby." The allure of grandeur and opulence, often associated with lavish residences, mirrors the allure of political ideologies in shaping voter sentiments. As Gatsby's mansion symbolizes both prosperity and moral decay, perhaps households' housing investments serve as symbolic reflections of their political inclinations. It's almost as if households are casting their votes not just at the ballot box, but with every brick and mortar they purchase!
In "The Big Short" and "Margin Call," the dynamics of housing markets and financial investments are explored with a sense of urgency and suspense, akin to the excitement of unraveling the ties between housing spending and electoral turns. Just as in the high-stakes world of finance, the intertwining of housing economics and political preferences presents a web of interconnected interests and motivations, ready to be unearthed with statistical rigor. It's almost as if the housing market is a complex puzzle, and political preferences are the missing pieces waiting to be uncovered!
But let's not forget that we're still discussing the findings of a study - perhaps correlations aren't just a type of association, but also a form of humor reserved for the statistically inclined.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between US household spending on housing and votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in Utah revealed a remarkably strong correlation. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.9399175, with an impressive r-squared value of 0.8834449. Furthermore, the p-value was less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship between these variables. It's almost as if the housing market and political preferences were in a statistical tango – one step forward, and no backward tango-ing on p-values here!
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually portrays the robust correlation observed in our analysis. The plot elegantly illustrates how as household spending on housing increases, so does support for the Democratic nominee in Utah. It's as if the voters were saying, "We may live in a red state, but our housing preferences are feeling pretty blue!"
In line with these findings, it's clear that there is a compelling connection between US household spending on housing and voting behavior in Utah. This novel insight prompts us to ponder the question: does the roof over our heads influence the color of the political roof over the state? It's almost as if the voters are giving us a clue – "It's not just the slopes of the Wasatch Mountains that influence our decisions; it's also the slopes of our roofs!"
Overall, our study sheds light on an intriguing relationship that extends beyond the usual realms of political analysis and economic trends. It adds an unexpected twist to the narrative of political affiliations and housing investments, reminding us that in the world of statistical analysis, there's always room for a dad joke or two!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study provide compelling evidence of a strong and significant association between US household spending on housing and votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in Utah. This lends support to previous research that has indicated a link between housing expenditures and political preferences. Our findings align with the work of Smith and Doe (2015) and Jones et al. (2018), reinforcing the idea that housing investments are indeed intertwined with electoral choices. It's as if the housing market and political preferences were in a statistical tango – one step forward, and no backward tango-ing on p-values here!

The rather house-predictable relationship we found between housing expenditures and Democratic voting behavior corroborates existing literature that has shown a positive correlation between discretionary spending on housing and political party affiliation. It's almost as if households are casting their votes not just at the ballot box, but with every brick and mortar they purchase! The fact that our results align with these prior studies emphasizes the robustness of the relationship and adds weight to the notion that housing investments play a role in shaping political leanings.

We also cannot overlook the importance of our findings within the context of Utah’s political landscape. The strong correlation observed between household spending on housing and support for the Democratic nominee in a predominantly Republican state presents a thought-provoking paradox. It's as if the voters were saying, "We may live in a red state, but our housing preferences are feeling pretty blue!" This unexpected trend challenges traditional political assumptions and opens the door to further exploration of the complex interplay between personal finances and electoral decisions.

It's crucial to note that correlation does not imply causation, and our study does not establish a causal relationship between household spending on housing and voting behavior. However, the strength of the association we found warrants continued investigation into the underlying mechanisms at play. Perhaps there's a twist in the housing market that's influencing political color palettes – it's not just the slopes of the Wasatch Mountains that influence our decisions, it's also the slopes of our roofs! These intriguing possibilities present fertile ground for future research endeavors.

In conclusion, our study contributes to the growing body of literature that explores the intersection of housing economics and political behavior. By revealing a compelling correlation between US household spending on housing and votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in Utah, we've added an unexpected twist to the narrative of political affiliations and housing investments. It's almost as if the voters are giving us a clue – perhaps the roof over our heads does indeed influence the color of the political roof over the state! Our work highlights the need for further inquiry into the nuanced ways in which personal financial decisions intersect with political preferences, and it underscores the value of statistical analysis in uncovering these captivating relationships. And speaking of personal decisions, did you hear about the statistician who took his car to the garage? He wanted an estimate, but he got a standard deviation!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US household spending on housing and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Utah. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Home Is Where the Votes Are: A Correlational Study of US Household Spending on Housing and Democratic Presidential Voting Behavior in Utah"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we dive into the delightful world of statistical analysis to explore the intriguing relationship between US household spending on housing and votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in the unlikely setting of Utah. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we meticulously examined the spending habits of households and their voting inclinations over the years 2000 to 2020.

Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9399175 with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between household spending on housing and support for the Democratic candidate in Utah. Put simply, the more households invested in their abodes, the more inclined they were to cast their votes in favor of the Democratic nominee. It seems that when it comes to politics, home truly is where the heart – and the votes – are!

Speaking of homes, did you hear about the mathematician who was afraid of negative numbers? He'd stop at nothing to avoid them!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between household spending on housing and political behavior has long been a subject of interest and debate. In this study, we extend this inquiry to the unlikely political landscape of Utah, where the Democratic presidential candidate has historically faced an uphill battle. The underlying question we aim to answer is: does household spending on housing have any impact on the voting behavior of Utah residents? It’s almost like asking if throwing a house party can influence the outcome of an election – talk about a real estate of the union!
Utah, known for its stunning landscapes and conservative political leanings, serves as a fascinating setting to explore this connection. As we delve into the data, we cannot help but muse over the peculiar notion that housing expenditures, often associated with personal finances and lifestyle choices, would have any bearing on political preferences. It’s almost as improbable as finding a housing market that isn’t in a state of flux!
Our statistical analysis utilizes data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to examine household spending on housing, and complements this with election results from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. Analyzing trends from 2000 to 2020, we sought to identify any discernible patterns that could shed light on the relationship between housing investments and electoral behavior. It’s almost as if we’re playing a game of real estate roulette with voting intentions!
As we unravel the findings of this study, we hope to not only contribute to the academic discourse on the intricate interplay between social and economic factors in shaping political landscapes, but also to add a touch of humor and wonder to an often-staid field of inquiry. After all, who said statistical analyses couldn't be both enlightening and entertaining?

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between US household spending on housing and votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in Utah revealed a remarkably strong correlation. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.9399175, with an impressive r-squared value of 0.8834449. Furthermore, the p-value was less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship between these variables. It's almost as if the housing market and political preferences were in a statistical tango – one step forward, and no backward tango-ing on p-values here!
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually portrays the robust correlation observed in our analysis. The plot elegantly illustrates how as household spending on housing increases, so does support for the Democratic nominee in Utah. It's as if the voters were saying, "We may live in a red state, but our housing preferences are feeling pretty blue!"
In line with these findings, it's clear that there is a compelling connection between US household spending on housing and voting behavior in Utah. This novel insight prompts us to ponder the question: does the roof over our heads influence the color of the political roof over the state? It's almost as if the voters are giving us a clue – "It's not just the slopes of the Wasatch Mountains that influence our decisions; it's also the slopes of our roofs!"
Overall, our study sheds light on an intriguing relationship that extends beyond the usual realms of political analysis and economic trends. It adds an unexpected twist to the narrative of political affiliations and housing investments, reminding us that in the world of statistical analysis, there's always room for a dad joke or two!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has provided compelling evidence for the strong correlation between US household spending on housing and votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in Utah. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9399175, with a p-value of less than 0.01, underscores the significance of this relationship. It's almost like the voters were saying, "We don't just support the blue candidate; we also have a soft spot for blueprints!"

Furthermore, the visual representation in our scatterplot elegantly captures the upward trajectory of support for the Democratic nominee as household spending on housing increases. It's as if the data points themselves were humming, "I'm dreaming of a blue house, just like the one in the ballot box!"

This unexpected interplay between housing investments and political affiliations challenges conventional wisdom and adds a refreshing nuance to our understanding of voting behavior. It's almost like realizing that the swing in political preferences might just be related to the swing of a pendulum on a porch!

While our findings may appear whimsical at first glance, they underscore the multidimensional nature of political decision-making and the intricate interplay of personal finances and electoral preferences. It's almost like unraveling the threads of a political tapestry and finding them woven into the fibers of our homes!

In light of these amusing yet insightful discoveries, we firmly assert that no further research in this area is needed. Like a well-built foundation, our findings stand firm, and it's time to hang up our statistical hats and retire these dad jokes – at least until the next unexpected correlation comes knocking on our data's door!

No more research is needed in this area as the humor data has been exhausted in this study.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Home Is Where the Votes Are: A Correlational Study of US Household Spending on Housing and Democratic Presidential Voting Behavior in Utah. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Political Housing Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Home Is Where the Votes Are: A Correlational Study of US Household Spending on Housing and Democratic Presidential Voting Behavior in Utah. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for the Advancement of Household and Political Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Home Is Where the Votes Are: A Correlational Study of US Household Spending on Housing and Democratic Presidential Voting Behavior in Utah with an abstract of In this research paper, we dive into the delightful world of statistical analysis to explore the intriguing relationship between US household spending on housing and votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in the unlikely setting of Utah. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we meticulously examined the spending habits of households and their voting inclinations over the years 2000 to 2020.
Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9399175 with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between household spending on housing and support for the Democratic candidate in Utah. Put simply, the more households invested in their abodes, the more inclined they were to cast their votes in favor of the Democratic nominee. It seems that when it comes to politics, home truly is where the heart – and the votes – are!
Speaking of homes, did you hear about the mathematician who was afraid of negative numbers? He'd stop at nothing to avoid them!

ChatGPT:

US household spending on housing, Democratic presidential voting behavior, Utah, correlation study, Bureau of Labor Statistics, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, housing investment and political support

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

US household spending on housing
Detailed data title: Annual US household spend on housing, as a percentage of total household spend
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
See what else correlates with US household spending on housing

Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Utah
Detailed data title: Percentage of all votes cast for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Utah
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Utah

Correlation r = 0.9399175 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8834449 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 88.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Utah) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., US household spending on housing) over the 6 years from 2000 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00531. 0.0053064184506021800000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 0.531% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 188 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.54, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200020042008201220162020
US household spending on housing (Household spend)32.380132.072833.888632.827332.953534.9056
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Utah (Percentage of votes)26.344725.995634.405724.749727.461337.646




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([32.3801,32.0728,33.8886,32.8273,32.9535,34.9056,])
array_2 = np.array([26.3447,25.9956,34.4057,24.7497,27.4613,37.646,])
array_1_name = "US household spending on housing"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Utah"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!


Correlation ID: 4921 · Black Variable ID: 19962 · Red Variable ID: 26175
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0