about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,913 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Manitowoc, Wisconsin and the second variable is Gasoline pumped in Slovenia.  The chart goes from 1992 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As air pollution in Manitowoc, Wisconsin increases, it creates a subtle atmospheric shift. This shift, influenced by the unique cheese particles in the air, interacts with the molecular structure of gasoline. The end result is a surprising boost in the efficiency of Slovenian gas pumps, leading to an increase in gasoline pumped. It's like the cheese-laden air pollution of Wisconsin has a gouda-nfluence on the gas pumping habits of Slovenia. Who would have thought that the road to more gasoline in Slovenia could be paved with cheddar-scented air from halfway across the world in Manitowoc? It's a truly grate connection that seems to brie keeping the gas flowing in the land of castles and caves.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A photo-realistic image ] of a rural gas station in Slovenia, surrounded by lush green hills and the iconic Slovenian countryside. The air is hazy with a golden hue, giving a dreamy and ethereal quality to the scene. The gas pumps are in focus, and wisps of cheese particles can be seen mingling with the gasoline as it flows into the vehicles. The atmosphere exudes a sense of surprise and wonder at the unexpected influence of the unique cheese-laden air pollution from Manitowoc, Wisconsin. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Manitowoc, Wisconsin and Gasoline pumped in Slovenia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Hyper-realistic Art nouveau Data cyber art Symbolism A photo-realistic image
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Manitowoc, Wisconsin and Gasoline pumped in Slovenia, in the following situation: As air pollution in Manitowoc, Wisconsin increases, it creates a subtle atmospheric shift. This shift, influenced by the unique cheese particles in the air, interacts with the molecular structure of gasoline. The end result is a surprising boost in the efficiency of Slovenian gas pumps, leading to an increase in gasoline pumped. It's like the cheese-laden air pollution of Wisconsin has a gouda-nfluence on the gas pumping habits of Slovenia. Who would have thought that the road to more gasoline in Slovenia could be paved with cheddar-scented air from halfway across the world in Manitowoc? It's a truly grate connection that seems to brie keeping the gas flowing in the land of castles and caves.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Manitowoc, Wisconsin, the air is thick with cheese particles, creating a hazy atmosphere. As the air pollution increases, the molecular structure of the gasoline interacts with the unique cheese particles, resulting in a surprising boost in efficiency. Meanwhile, in Slovenia, gas pumps are working overtime as the increased efficiency leads to more gasoline being pumped. The unexpected influence of cheese-laden air pollution from Wisconsin seems to be keeping the gas flowing in the land of castles and caves.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In Manitowoc, Wisconsin, the air is thick with cheese particles, creating a hazy atmosphere. As the air pollution increases, the molecular structure of the gasoline interacts with the unique cheese particles, resulting in a surprising boost in efficiency. Meanwhile, in Slovenia, gas pumps are working overtime as the increased efficiency leads to more gasoline being pumped. The unexpected influence of cheese-laden air pollution from Wisconsin seems to be keeping the gas flowing in the land of castles and caves. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A photo-realistic image ] of a rural gas station in Slovenia, surrounded by lush green hills and the iconic Slovenian countryside. The air is hazy with a golden hue, giving a dreamy and ethereal quality to the scene. The gas pumps are in focus, and wisps of cheese particles can be seen mingling with the gasoline as it flows into the vehicles. The atmosphere exudes a sense of surprise and wonder at the unexpected influence of the unique cheese-laden air pollution from Manitowoc, Wisconsin.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Air pollution in Manitowoc, Wisconsin positively influenced Gasoline pumped in Slovenia.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Diesel Dilemma: Unleaded Laughter in Manitowoc and Slovenian Fuel Shenanigans

Journal of Comedic Fuel Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Manitowoc, Wisconsin and Gasoline pumped in Slovenia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8298267 and p < 0.01 for 1992 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Diesel Dilemma: Unleaded Laughter in Manitowoc and Slovenian Fuel Shenanigans

[[ABSTRACT]]
Fueling the fire of inquiry, our study delves deep into the curious link between air pollution levels in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and the gasoline pumped in Slovenia. With a punnett square of data sets from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team embarked on this diesel-ightful journey to unravel the mysterious connection.

In a twist of fate, our analysis revealed a startling correlation coefficient of 0.8298267 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1992 to 2022. This unexpected linkage between seemingly disparate geographic regions had us exclaiming, "Why did the gasoline and air pollution go to couples therapy? Because they needed to work on their 'fuel'ationship!"

The findings of our study not only raise eyebrows but also tickle the scientific fancy. This lighthearted yet robust exploration opens the fuel-gates to further investigation, leaving us pondering, "Why do we tell actors to break a leg? Because every play has a cast."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Manitowoc, Wisconsin and Gasoline pumped in Slovenia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Diesel Dilemma: Unleaded Laughter in Manitowoc and Slovenian Fuel Shenanigans

[[ABSTRACT]]
Fueling the fire of inquiry, our study delves deep into the curious link between air pollution levels in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and the gasoline pumped in Slovenia. With a punnett square of data sets from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team embarked on this diesel-ightful journey to unravel the mysterious connection.

In a twist of fate, our analysis revealed a startling correlation coefficient of 0.8298267 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1992 to 2022. This unexpected linkage between seemingly disparate geographic regions had us exclaiming, "Why did the gasoline and air pollution go to couples therapy? Because they needed to work on their 'fuel'ationship!"

The findings of our study not only raise eyebrows but also tickle the scientific fancy. This lighthearted yet robust exploration opens the fuel-gates to further investigation, leaving us pondering, "Why do we tell actors to break a leg? Because every play has a cast."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Well, buckle up, my fellow researchers, for we are about to embark on a journey that's as unexpected as finding a vegan at a barbecue - the curious connection between air pollution levels in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and the gasoline pumped in Slovenia. As we delve into this fuel-ridden maze, let's not forget to keep our sense of humor intact, for science without a sprinkle of silliness is like a car without gas - it just won't go far. So, kick back, sip some unleaded laughter, and let's dive into this diesel dilemma.

Now, you might be scratching your head and wondering, "What do cheese and Slovenian gasoline have in common? They both stink if not properly aged!" But fear not, dear reader, for our study aims to unravel the enigmatic connection between these seemingly unrelated entities with the seriousness of a mathematician counting on their fingers.

As we wade through the sea of data, let's not lose sight of the bigger picture. Our investigation into this peculiar pairing not only serves to satisfy our scientific curiosity but also begs the question, "Why was the math book sad? It had too many problems." But I digress, let's not allow statistical analyses to dampen the spirit of exploration. After all, who says science can't be fun?

So, fasten your seatbelts, tighten your lab coats, and let's rev up our engines of inquiry as we navigate the diesel dilemma of Manitowoc and the shenanigans of Slovenian fuel. As we charge ahead, remember - a little laughter is the fuel that keeps the engine of curiosity running smoothly.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Manitowoc, Wisconsin and Gasoline pumped in Slovenia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Diesel Dilemma: Unleaded Laughter in Manitowoc and Slovenian Fuel Shenanigans

[[ABSTRACT]]
Fueling the fire of inquiry, our study delves deep into the curious link between air pollution levels in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and the gasoline pumped in Slovenia. With a punnett square of data sets from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team embarked on this diesel-ightful journey to unravel the mysterious connection.

In a twist of fate, our analysis revealed a startling correlation coefficient of 0.8298267 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1992 to 2022. This unexpected linkage between seemingly disparate geographic regions had us exclaiming, "Why did the gasoline and air pollution go to couples therapy? Because they needed to work on their 'fuel'ationship!"

The findings of our study not only raise eyebrows but also tickle the scientific fancy. This lighthearted yet robust exploration opens the fuel-gates to further investigation, leaving us pondering, "Why do we tell actors to break a leg? Because every play has a cast."

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Well, buckle up, my fellow researchers, for we are about to embark on a journey that's as unexpected as finding a vegan at a barbecue - the curious connection between air pollution levels in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and the gasoline pumped in Slovenia. As we delve into this fuel-ridden maze, let's not forget to keep our sense of humor intact, for science without a sprinkle of silliness is like a car without gas - it just won't go far. So, kick back, sip some unleaded laughter, and let's dive into this diesel dilemma.
Now, you might be scratching your head and wondering, "What do cheese and Slovenian gasoline have in common? They both stink if not properly aged!" But fear not, dear reader, for our study aims to unravel the enigmatic connection between these seemingly unrelated entities with the seriousness of a mathematician counting on their fingers.
As we wade through the sea of data, let's not lose sight of the bigger picture. Our investigation into this peculiar pairing not only serves to satisfy our scientific curiosity but also begs the question, "Why was the math book sad? It had too many problems." But I digress, let's not allow statistical analyses to dampen the spirit of exploration. After all, who says science can't be fun?
So, fasten your seatbelts, tighten your lab coats, and let's rev up our engines of inquiry as we navigate the diesel dilemma of Manitowoc and the shenanigans of Slovenian fuel. As we charge ahead, remember - a little laughter is the fuel that keeps the engine of curiosity running smoothly.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work "Air Pollution and Its Impacts on Public Health," Smith et al. delve into the detrimental effects of air pollution on human health, highlighting the increased risk of respiratory illnesses and cardiovascular diseases. Similarly, Doe and Jones, in "The Geography of Air Quality," underscore the complex interplay of geographical factors in shaping air pollution patterns, emphasizing the influence of industrial emissions and vehicular exhaust.

It is important to note, however, that the literature on the dire consequences of air pollution often fails to acknowledge the potential for whimsical whimsies within the realm of scientific inquiry. As we navigate through this scholarly journey, let's not forget to inject a dash of levity into our discussions, much like a scientist adding a drop of titration liquid into a serious solution, because, as the old saying goes, "Why can't you trust an atom? Because they make up everything."

In "The Fascinating World of Fuel Chemistry," Johnson and Smithson meticulously analyze the chemical compositions of various fuels and their impact on environmental sustainability. Their comprehensive study provides valuable insights into the composition of gasoline and its potential correlation with air pollution levels. On a lighter note, it also reminds us of the classic dad joke, "What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear!"

In exploring the curious connection between air pollution in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and the gasoline pumped in Slovenia, our research draws inspiration from a diverse array of sources. From the informative pages of "Gasoline Economy: A Global Perspective" by Williams and Brown, to the fictional but thought-provoking narrative of "The Diesel Dilemma: Tales of Two Cities" by Green, our review encompasses a wide spectrum of literature to illuminate the enigmatic relationship between disparate geographical regions and their respective fuel choices.

In a nod to the ever-evolving nature of internet culture, popular memes such as "The Pollution Ploy" and "Slovenian Fuel Shenanigans" serve as humorous reminders of the intertwined nature of air pollution discourse and global fuel consumption. As we engage with these digital jests, we are reminded that even in the realm of scientific investigation, a well-timed meme can spark jovial discussions and foster a sense of camaraderie among researchers. After all, who wouldn't appreciate a good science meme? They're always "elementary, my dear Watson!"

As we sift through the wealth of literature on this captivating subject, it becomes increasingly evident that our study must not only shed light on the serious implications of air pollution and fuel consumption but also embrace the joy of scientific discovery. Because, in the words of a wise researcher, "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Manitowoc, Wisconsin and Gasoline pumped in Slovenia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1992 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Diesel Dilemma: Unleaded Laughter in Manitowoc and Slovenian Fuel Shenanigans

[[ABSTRACT]]
Fueling the fire of inquiry, our study delves deep into the curious link between air pollution levels in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and the gasoline pumped in Slovenia. With a punnett square of data sets from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team embarked on this diesel-ightful journey to unravel the mysterious connection.

In a twist of fate, our analysis revealed a startling correlation coefficient of 0.8298267 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1992 to 2022. This unexpected linkage between seemingly disparate geographic regions had us exclaiming, "Why did the gasoline and air pollution go to couples therapy? Because they needed to work on their 'fuel'ationship!"

The findings of our study not only raise eyebrows but also tickle the scientific fancy. This lighthearted yet robust exploration opens the fuel-gates to further investigation, leaving us pondering, "Why do we tell actors to break a leg? Because every play has a cast."

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Well, buckle up, my fellow researchers, for we are about to embark on a journey that's as unexpected as finding a vegan at a barbecue - the curious connection between air pollution levels in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and the gasoline pumped in Slovenia. As we delve into this fuel-ridden maze, let's not forget to keep our sense of humor intact, for science without a sprinkle of silliness is like a car without gas - it just won't go far. So, kick back, sip some unleaded laughter, and let's dive into this diesel dilemma.
Now, you might be scratching your head and wondering, "What do cheese and Slovenian gasoline have in common? They both stink if not properly aged!" But fear not, dear reader, for our study aims to unravel the enigmatic connection between these seemingly unrelated entities with the seriousness of a mathematician counting on their fingers.
As we wade through the sea of data, let's not lose sight of the bigger picture. Our investigation into this peculiar pairing not only serves to satisfy our scientific curiosity but also begs the question, "Why was the math book sad? It had too many problems." But I digress, let's not allow statistical analyses to dampen the spirit of exploration. After all, who says science can't be fun?
So, fasten your seatbelts, tighten your lab coats, and let's rev up our engines of inquiry as we navigate the diesel dilemma of Manitowoc and the shenanigans of Slovenian fuel. As we charge ahead, remember - a little laughter is the fuel that keeps the engine of curiosity running smoothly.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To decode the riddle between the air pollution levels in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and the gasoline pumped in Slovenia, our research team concocted a delightfully convoluted yet scientifically sound methodology. Our first order of business was to gather an extensive array of data spanning the years 1992 to 2022. With our capes (read: lab coats) billowing in the wind of scientific inquiry, we swooped into the databases of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration like caped crusaders hunting for elusive fuel-related mysteries.

With our data treasure trove secured, we gallantly steered our research vessel through the choppy waves of statistical analysis, employing a mix of correlation analyses, regression modeling, and time series algorithms. Like fearless navigators of the scientific seas, we charted the course of emissions and gasoline compositions, all while singing sea shanties about combustion and carbon footprints. Ahoy, matey, it's a fuel-filled adventure on the high seas of research!

As the data churned like a burbling cauldron of scientific revelation, we tapped into the power of advanced computational techniques. We cast spells with mystical software programs such as R, Python, and some good ol' Excel enchantments to conjure the statistical significance and elucidate the ethereal relationship between air pollution and gasoline molecular dances. And speaking of molecular dances, why did the hydrocarbons break up? They were too volatile!

In the spirit of adventurous scientific inquiry, we also dared to venture into the realm of multivariate analysis, embracing the complexity like valiant heroes facing the Hydra. With our metaphorical swords of regression coefficients and shields of p-values raised high, we tackled the intricacies of interwoven variables with the bravery of a knight fighting in a tangled forest, because nothing stops the march of research progress, not even statistical thickets!

Now, you might be wondering, "What's a pirate's favorite statistical test? The ARRRR-2 test!" But fear not, dear reader, for our team ensured that every test, model, and analysis was meticulously scrutinized to uphold the noble virtues of accuracy and rigor. As our journey through the diesel dilemma and fuel shenanigans unfolded, we navigated the stormy seas of data with the wisdom of ancient mariners and the whimsy of modern-day explorers, because what's research without a sprinkle of whimsy, right?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Manitowoc, Wisconsin and Gasoline pumped in Slovenia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1992 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8298267, r-squared of 0.6886123, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Diesel Dilemma: Unleaded Laughter in Manitowoc and Slovenian Fuel Shenanigans

[[ABSTRACT]]
Fueling the fire of inquiry, our study delves deep into the curious link between air pollution levels in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and the gasoline pumped in Slovenia. With a punnett square of data sets from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team embarked on this diesel-ightful journey to unravel the mysterious connection.

In a twist of fate, our analysis revealed a startling correlation coefficient of 0.8298267 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1992 to 2022. This unexpected linkage between seemingly disparate geographic regions had us exclaiming, "Why did the gasoline and air pollution go to couples therapy? Because they needed to work on their 'fuel'ationship!"

The findings of our study not only raise eyebrows but also tickle the scientific fancy. This lighthearted yet robust exploration opens the fuel-gates to further investigation, leaving us pondering, "Why do we tell actors to break a leg? Because every play has a cast."

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Well, buckle up, my fellow researchers, for we are about to embark on a journey that's as unexpected as finding a vegan at a barbecue - the curious connection between air pollution levels in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and the gasoline pumped in Slovenia. As we delve into this fuel-ridden maze, let's not forget to keep our sense of humor intact, for science without a sprinkle of silliness is like a car without gas - it just won't go far. So, kick back, sip some unleaded laughter, and let's dive into this diesel dilemma.
Now, you might be scratching your head and wondering, "What do cheese and Slovenian gasoline have in common? They both stink if not properly aged!" But fear not, dear reader, for our study aims to unravel the enigmatic connection between these seemingly unrelated entities with the seriousness of a mathematician counting on their fingers.
As we wade through the sea of data, let's not lose sight of the bigger picture. Our investigation into this peculiar pairing not only serves to satisfy our scientific curiosity but also begs the question, "Why was the math book sad? It had too many problems." But I digress, let's not allow statistical analyses to dampen the spirit of exploration. After all, who says science can't be fun?
So, fasten your seatbelts, tighten your lab coats, and let's rev up our engines of inquiry as we navigate the diesel dilemma of Manitowoc and the shenanigans of Slovenian fuel. As we charge ahead, remember - a little laughter is the fuel that keeps the engine of curiosity running smoothly.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from 1992 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8298267 between air pollution levels in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and the gasoline pumped in Slovenia. This finding left us gasping for air and exclaiming, "Why did the air pollution ask the gasoline out on a date? Because it wanted to get a little 'oxidized'!"

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6886123 indicated that approximately 68.86% of the variability in air pollution levels in Manitowoc could be explained by the variability in gasoline composition in Slovenia. This statistical revelation had us chuckling, "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything, including statistical models!"

The p-value of less than 0.01 provided strong evidence against the null hypothesis and indicated a significant relationship between air pollution in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and the type of gasoline used in Slovenia. This unexpected result had us raising our eyebrows and asking, "Why did the scientist install a knocker on his door? He wanted to win the 'No-bell' prize!"

Additionally, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong positive correlation between air pollution levels in Manitowoc and the gasoline composition in Slovenia, reaffirming our findings and leaving us pondering, "Why don't we ever tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears!"

These revelatory results not only shed light on a seemingly incongruous association but also ignite further laughter-laden inquiries into the puzzling linkage between air pollution in Manitowoc and the fuel dynamics in Slovenia. As we close this section, remember, "Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Manitowoc, Wisconsin and Gasoline pumped in Slovenia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Diesel Dilemma: Unleaded Laughter in Manitowoc and Slovenian Fuel Shenanigans

[[ABSTRACT]]
Fueling the fire of inquiry, our study delves deep into the curious link between air pollution levels in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and the gasoline pumped in Slovenia. With a punnett square of data sets from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team embarked on this diesel-ightful journey to unravel the mysterious connection.

In a twist of fate, our analysis revealed a startling correlation coefficient of 0.8298267 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1992 to 2022. This unexpected linkage between seemingly disparate geographic regions had us exclaiming, "Why did the gasoline and air pollution go to couples therapy? Because they needed to work on their 'fuel'ationship!"

The findings of our study not only raise eyebrows but also tickle the scientific fancy. This lighthearted yet robust exploration opens the fuel-gates to further investigation, leaving us pondering, "Why do we tell actors to break a leg? Because every play has a cast."

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work "Air Pollution and Its Impacts on Public Health," Smith et al. delve into the detrimental effects of air pollution on human health, highlighting the increased risk of respiratory illnesses and cardiovascular diseases. Similarly, Doe and Jones, in "The Geography of Air Quality," underscore the complex interplay of geographical factors in shaping air pollution patterns, emphasizing the influence of industrial emissions and vehicular exhaust.
It is important to note, however, that the literature on the dire consequences of air pollution often fails to acknowledge the potential for whimsical whimsies within the realm of scientific inquiry. As we navigate through this scholarly journey, let's not forget to inject a dash of levity into our discussions, much like a scientist adding a drop of titration liquid into a serious solution, because, as the old saying goes, "Why can't you trust an atom? Because they make up everything."
In "The Fascinating World of Fuel Chemistry," Johnson and Smithson meticulously analyze the chemical compositions of various fuels and their impact on environmental sustainability. Their comprehensive study provides valuable insights into the composition of gasoline and its potential correlation with air pollution levels. On a lighter note, it also reminds us of the classic dad joke, "What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear!"
In exploring the curious connection between air pollution in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and the gasoline pumped in Slovenia, our research draws inspiration from a diverse array of sources. From the informative pages of "Gasoline Economy: A Global Perspective" by Williams and Brown, to the fictional but thought-provoking narrative of "The Diesel Dilemma: Tales of Two Cities" by Green, our review encompasses a wide spectrum of literature to illuminate the enigmatic relationship between disparate geographical regions and their respective fuel choices.
In a nod to the ever-evolving nature of internet culture, popular memes such as "The Pollution Ploy" and "Slovenian Fuel Shenanigans" serve as humorous reminders of the intertwined nature of air pollution discourse and global fuel consumption. As we engage with these digital jests, we are reminded that even in the realm of scientific investigation, a well-timed meme can spark jovial discussions and foster a sense of camaraderie among researchers. After all, who wouldn't appreciate a good science meme? They're always "elementary, my dear Watson!"
As we sift through the wealth of literature on this captivating subject, it becomes increasingly evident that our study must not only shed light on the serious implications of air pollution and fuel consumption but also embrace the joy of scientific discovery. Because, in the words of a wise researcher, "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything."

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from 1992 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8298267 between air pollution levels in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and the gasoline pumped in Slovenia. This finding left us gasping for air and exclaiming, "Why did the air pollution ask the gasoline out on a date? Because it wanted to get a little 'oxidized'!"
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6886123 indicated that approximately 68.86% of the variability in air pollution levels in Manitowoc could be explained by the variability in gasoline composition in Slovenia. This statistical revelation had us chuckling, "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything, including statistical models!"
The p-value of less than 0.01 provided strong evidence against the null hypothesis and indicated a significant relationship between air pollution in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and the type of gasoline used in Slovenia. This unexpected result had us raising our eyebrows and asking, "Why did the scientist install a knocker on his door? He wanted to win the 'No-bell' prize!"
Additionally, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong positive correlation between air pollution levels in Manitowoc and the gasoline composition in Slovenia, reaffirming our findings and leaving us pondering, "Why don't we ever tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears!"
These revelatory results not only shed light on a seemingly incongruous association but also ignite further laughter-laden inquiries into the puzzling linkage between air pollution in Manitowoc and the fuel dynamics in Slovenia. As we close this section, remember, "Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have illuminated a previously overlooked relationship between air pollution levels in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and the gasoline composition in Slovenia, strengthening the scientific understanding of cross-continental environmental influences. It is intriguing to observe how a geographic separation of thousands of miles does not shelter the air above Manitowoc from the impact of Slovenian fuel dynamics. This unexpected correlation has prompted us to ask, "Why don't we tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears. And apparently, the clouds have a strong sense of smell!"

The significant relationship between air pollution in Manitowoc and Slovenian gasoline is in line with prior literature, revealing the pervasive impact of fuel composition on air quality. Our results not only echo the poignant findings of Smith et al. and Johnson and Smithson but also push the scientific boundaries further, like a car trying to reach the last gas station before running out of fuel. We are compelled to ponder, "Why did the gasoline and air pollution go to couples therapy? Because they needed to work on their 'fuel'ationship and maybe find some common ground!"

The robust correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value emphasize the inextricable link between air pollution and fuel dynamics, catapulting our understanding into new heights, reminding us of the old saying, "Why do we tell actors to break a leg? Because every play has a cast, and every research study has some unexpected twists." Furthermore, our lighthearted yet revealing results evoke a sense of wonder, reaffirming that scientific inquiry can indeed be a diesel-ightful journey filled with both data-driven discoveries and unexpected dad jokes.

Through this research, we have not only broadened our understanding of environmental influences but also used humor to infuse levity into our scientific expedition. As we continue to unravel the complexities of air pollution and fuel relationships, we are reminded of the wise words, "Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts to admit they're just dying to get a laugh out of us!" Our study serves as a testament to the confluence of rigorous analysis, unexpected connections, and the joy of scientific exploration, leaving us with a smile on our faces and an eager anticipation for future research endeavors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Manitowoc, Wisconsin and Gasoline pumped in Slovenia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Diesel Dilemma: Unleaded Laughter in Manitowoc and Slovenian Fuel Shenanigans

[[ABSTRACT]]
Fueling the fire of inquiry, our study delves deep into the curious link between air pollution levels in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and the gasoline pumped in Slovenia. With a punnett square of data sets from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team embarked on this diesel-ightful journey to unravel the mysterious connection.

In a twist of fate, our analysis revealed a startling correlation coefficient of 0.8298267 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1992 to 2022. This unexpected linkage between seemingly disparate geographic regions had us exclaiming, "Why did the gasoline and air pollution go to couples therapy? Because they needed to work on their 'fuel'ationship!"

The findings of our study not only raise eyebrows but also tickle the scientific fancy. This lighthearted yet robust exploration opens the fuel-gates to further investigation, leaving us pondering, "Why do we tell actors to break a leg? Because every play has a cast."

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Well, buckle up, my fellow researchers, for we are about to embark on a journey that's as unexpected as finding a vegan at a barbecue - the curious connection between air pollution levels in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and the gasoline pumped in Slovenia. As we delve into this fuel-ridden maze, let's not forget to keep our sense of humor intact, for science without a sprinkle of silliness is like a car without gas - it just won't go far. So, kick back, sip some unleaded laughter, and let's dive into this diesel dilemma.
Now, you might be scratching your head and wondering, "What do cheese and Slovenian gasoline have in common? They both stink if not properly aged!" But fear not, dear reader, for our study aims to unravel the enigmatic connection between these seemingly unrelated entities with the seriousness of a mathematician counting on their fingers.
As we wade through the sea of data, let's not lose sight of the bigger picture. Our investigation into this peculiar pairing not only serves to satisfy our scientific curiosity but also begs the question, "Why was the math book sad? It had too many problems." But I digress, let's not allow statistical analyses to dampen the spirit of exploration. After all, who says science can't be fun?
So, fasten your seatbelts, tighten your lab coats, and let's rev up our engines of inquiry as we navigate the diesel dilemma of Manitowoc and the shenanigans of Slovenian fuel. As we charge ahead, remember - a little laughter is the fuel that keeps the engine of curiosity running smoothly.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from 1992 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8298267 between air pollution levels in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and the gasoline pumped in Slovenia. This finding left us gasping for air and exclaiming, "Why did the air pollution ask the gasoline out on a date? Because it wanted to get a little 'oxidized'!"
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6886123 indicated that approximately 68.86% of the variability in air pollution levels in Manitowoc could be explained by the variability in gasoline composition in Slovenia. This statistical revelation had us chuckling, "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything, including statistical models!"
The p-value of less than 0.01 provided strong evidence against the null hypothesis and indicated a significant relationship between air pollution in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and the type of gasoline used in Slovenia. This unexpected result had us raising our eyebrows and asking, "Why did the scientist install a knocker on his door? He wanted to win the 'No-bell' prize!"
Additionally, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong positive correlation between air pollution levels in Manitowoc and the gasoline composition in Slovenia, reaffirming our findings and leaving us pondering, "Why don't we ever tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears!"
These revelatory results not only shed light on a seemingly incongruous association but also ignite further laughter-laden inquiries into the puzzling linkage between air pollution in Manitowoc and the fuel dynamics in Slovenia. As we close this section, remember, "Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unveiled a remarkably robust correlation between air pollution levels in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and the gasoline pumped in Slovenia. This unexpected revelation has us proclaiming, "Why was the math book sad? It had too many problems - just like this unexpected correlation!" The findings of our research not only provoke scientific pondering but also inspire a chuckle or two, reminding us that a little laughter can fuel the engine of inquiry just as effectively as unleaded gasoline.

The correlation coefficient of 0.8298267 and p-value of less than 0.01 provide compelling evidence of the relationship between air pollution and gasoline composition, leaving us scratching our heads and jesting, "Why did the gasoline and air pollution go to couples therapy? Because they needed to work on their 'fuel'ationship - with a little statistical counseling, of course!"

These findings have opened the door to a new realm of inquiry, but do we really need to delve deeper into the diesel dilemma of Manitowoc and Slovenian fuel shenanigans? Our resounding answer is, "No, we don't need more research - we've already fueled our curiosity and cracked enough dad jokes to last a lifetime!"



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Diesel Dilemma: Unleaded Laughter in Manitowoc and Slovenian Fuel Shenanigans. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Comedic Fuel Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Diesel Dilemma: Unleaded Laughter in Manitowoc and Slovenian Fuel Shenanigans. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The League of International Mirth Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Diesel Dilemma: Unleaded Laughter in Manitowoc and Slovenian Fuel Shenanigans with an abstract of Fueling the fire of inquiry, our study delves deep into the curious link between air pollution levels in Manitowoc, Wisconsin, and the gasoline pumped in Slovenia. With a punnett square of data sets from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team embarked on this diesel-ightful journey to unravel the mysterious connection.
In a twist of fate, our analysis revealed a startling correlation coefficient of 0.8298267 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1992 to 2022. This unexpected linkage between seemingly disparate geographic regions had us exclaiming, "Why did the gasoline and air pollution go to couples therapy? Because they needed to work on their 'fuel'ationship!"
The findings of our study not only raise eyebrows but also tickle the scientific fancy. This lighthearted yet robust exploration opens the fuel-gates to further investigation, leaving us pondering, "Why do we tell actors to break a leg? Because every play has a cast.

ChatGPT:

diesel, air pollution, gasoline, Manitowoc, Wisconsin, Slovenia, correlation coefficient, Environmental Protection Agency, Energy Information Administration, geographic regions

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Manitowoc, Wisconsin
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Manitowoc, WI
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Manitowoc, Wisconsin

Gasoline pumped in Slovenia
Detailed data title: Volume of gasoline pumped consumed in Slovenia in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Gasoline pumped in Slovenia

Correlation r = 0.8298267 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6886123 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 68.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Gasoline pumped in Slovenia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Manitowoc, Wisconsin) over the 31 years from 1992 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.8E-9. 0.0000000078478088106923120000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 7.8E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 127,424,103 random variables You don't actually need 127 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 30 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 30 because we have two variables measured over a period of 31 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.67, 0.92 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Manitowoc, Wisconsin (Bad air quality days)0.207650.1576090.260870.4076090.3423910.364130.4076090.3333330.2851240.3168720.3130080.3004120.2083330.3640170.265560.2948210.2468620.2105260.1950210.1340210.2604170.2679430.1044780.1675390.1489360.08860760.1548120.07425740.1197920.159420.156566
Gasoline pumped in Slovenia (Million Barrels/Day)13.38815.950717.712319.005521.327921.158918.471217.915118.631118.523317.750717.339715.379815.161614.81114.353415.027313.756213.471213.104111.871610.879510.2119.983569.792359.578089.767129.279457.497278.504119.78904




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.20765,0.157609,0.26087,0.407609,0.342391,0.36413,0.407609,0.333333,0.285124,0.316872,0.313008,0.300412,0.208333,0.364017,0.26556,0.294821,0.246862,0.210526,0.195021,0.134021,0.260417,0.267943,0.104478,0.167539,0.148936,0.0886076,0.154812,0.0742574,0.119792,0.15942,0.156566,])
array_2 = np.array([13.388,15.9507,17.7123,19.0055,21.3279,21.1589,18.4712,17.9151,18.6311,18.5233,17.7507,17.3397,15.3798,15.1616,14.811,14.3534,15.0273,13.7562,13.4712,13.1041,11.8716,10.8795,10.211,9.98356,9.79235,9.57808,9.76712,9.27945,7.49727,8.50411,9.78904,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Manitowoc, Wisconsin"
array_2_name = "Gasoline pumped in Slovenia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 4913 · Black Variable ID: 21705 · Red Variable ID: 24908
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0