about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,899 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and the second variable is Total likes of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2014 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

There must be a connection between spark plug expertise and sparking interest in Simone's content! Perhaps the mechanics are revving up enthusiasm for her quirky DIY projects, or maybe they're just big fans of her electrifying personality! It's like they say, when it comes to spreading the love for Simone's videos, these mechanics are really gearing up for success!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a lively motorcycle workshop in Washington. The scene showcases a group of mechanics huddled around a cluttered workbench, engrossed in watching Simone Giertz's latest YouTube video on a small, portable screen. The mechanics are caught in the moment, laughing and exchanging animated discussions about Simone's quirky DIY projects. As they fine-tune the motorcycle, their enthusiasm is reflected in the sparks flying from the spark plugs, mirroring the excitement generated by Simone's electrifying content. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and Total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Celtic art Pop art Cutsy graphics A Discovery magazine cover image Low poly
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and Total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos, in the following situation: There must be a connection between spark plug expertise and sparking interest in Simone's content! Perhaps the mechanics are revving up enthusiasm for her quirky DIY projects, or maybe they're just big fans of her electrifying personality! It's like they say, when it comes to spreading the love for Simone's videos, these mechanics are really gearing up for success!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vibrant workshop in Washington, a group of motorcycle mechanics is gathered around a bench covered in various tools and spark plugs. They are eagerly watching Simone Giertz's latest YouTube video on a portable screen, laughing at her quirky antics and clever DIY projects. As they work on fine-tuning a motorcycle, the mechanics exchange excited discussions about the video, their like count steadily increasing on the screen beside them. The sparks flying from the plugs seem to mirror their enthusiasm for Simone's electrifying content.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a vibrant workshop in Washington, a group of motorcycle mechanics is gathered around a bench covered in various tools and spark plugs. They are eagerly watching Simone Giertz's latest YouTube video on a portable screen, laughing at her quirky antics and clever DIY projects. As they work on fine-tuning a motorcycle, the mechanics exchange excited discussions about the video, their like count steadily increasing on the screen beside them. The sparks flying from the plugs seem to mirror their enthusiasm for Simone's electrifying content. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a lively motorcycle workshop in Washington. The scene showcases a group of mechanics huddled around a cluttered workbench, engrossed in watching Simone Giertz's latest YouTube video on a small, portable screen. The mechanics are caught in the moment, laughing and exchanging animated discussions about Simone's quirky DIY projects. As they fine-tune the motorcycle, their enthusiasm is reflected in the sparks flying from the spark plugs, mirroring the excitement generated by Simone's electrifying content.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington caused Total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Tenuous Tie Between the Tinkerers and Titillating Techies

The Journal of Quirky Innovation Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and Total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9735299 and p < 0.01 for 2014 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Tenuous Tie Between the Tinkerers and Titillating Techies

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to uncovering the unforeseen and the unconventional, our research team embarked on a quest to investigate the unparalleled relationship between the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and the total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. With a twinkle in their eyes and a pocketful of puns, our team delved deep into this enigmatic connection, all the while hoping we wouldn't be driven to madness by the engine of curiosity.

Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and delving into the depths of YouTube analytics, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9735299 and p < 0.01 for the years 2014 to 2022. Surprisingly, our findings suggested that as the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington revved up, so did the total likes on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos, a statistical correlation more unexpected than finding a sidecar on a unicycle.

While at first glance this a-bit-out-there association may seem as ill-fitting as an engine in a kayak, our study has unearthed an unforeseen link between the grease-covered hands of motorcycle mechanics and the whimsical, robotic antics of Simone Giertz. It just goes to show, sometimes even the most unrelated entities can roll together with a common thread - or in this case, a common tread.

But hey, it also goes to show, sometimes the greatest discoveries come in the most unexpected places, like finding a spare rib in the glove compartment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and Total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Tenuous Tie Between the Tinkerers and Titillating Techies

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to uncovering the unforeseen and the unconventional, our research team embarked on a quest to investigate the unparalleled relationship between the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and the total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. With a twinkle in their eyes and a pocketful of puns, our team delved deep into this enigmatic connection, all the while hoping we wouldn't be driven to madness by the engine of curiosity.

Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and delving into the depths of YouTube analytics, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9735299 and p < 0.01 for the years 2014 to 2022. Surprisingly, our findings suggested that as the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington revved up, so did the total likes on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos, a statistical correlation more unexpected than finding a sidecar on a unicycle.

While at first glance this a-bit-out-there association may seem as ill-fitting as an engine in a kayak, our study has unearthed an unforeseen link between the grease-covered hands of motorcycle mechanics and the whimsical, robotic antics of Simone Giertz. It just goes to show, sometimes even the most unrelated entities can roll together with a common thread - or in this case, a common tread.

But hey, it also goes to show, sometimes the greatest discoveries come in the most unexpected places, like finding a spare rib in the glove compartment.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Amidst the hum of motorcycle engines and the buzz of technological innovation, a peculiar connection caught the attention of our research team. As we revved up our curiosity and applied the brakes to any preconceived notions, we found ourselves pondering the inexplicable link between the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and the total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. The seemingly disparate worlds of grease and gadgets collided with unexpected vigor, prompting us to investigate this unexpected correlation.

It is often said that when life throws you a curveball, you should rev your engines and move forward. With that in mind, we delved into the world of statistical analysis, armed with our data and an irrepressible spirit of inquisitiveness. Our pursuit was no wild goose chase - well, maybe a bit wild considering the topic at hand - as we sought to bring to light a correlation that was more unexpected than finding a wrench in a haystack.

When conducting our research, we were acutely aware of the potential for spurious correlations, as we did not want to end up with a study that was as reliable as a broken motorcycle chain. Inploring the depths of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we persisted in our quest, hoping to separate the signal from the noise in this peculiar connection. The fruits of our labor, akin to finding the perfect wrench for a stubborn bolt, revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9735299 and p < 0.01 for the years 2014 to 2022.

Our findings shed light on a curious interplay between the calloused hands of motorcycle mechanics and the whimsical, robotic tinkerings brought forth by Simone Giertz. It seems that beneath the grease and gears, a parallel can be drawn between the artistry of motorcycle maintenance and the mechanical marvels that captivate Giertz's online audience. As we uncovered this correlation, we couldn't help but feel a kinship with those who discover unexpected correlations in their own work, much like finding spare parts in unexpected places.

Stay tuned as we delve further into the mechanics of this unexpected correlation, reminding ourselves that sometimes, even in the world of academia, the most unexpected connections can surprise us like finding a spare rib in the glove compartment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and Total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Tenuous Tie Between the Tinkerers and Titillating Techies

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to uncovering the unforeseen and the unconventional, our research team embarked on a quest to investigate the unparalleled relationship between the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and the total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. With a twinkle in their eyes and a pocketful of puns, our team delved deep into this enigmatic connection, all the while hoping we wouldn't be driven to madness by the engine of curiosity.

Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and delving into the depths of YouTube analytics, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9735299 and p < 0.01 for the years 2014 to 2022. Surprisingly, our findings suggested that as the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington revved up, so did the total likes on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos, a statistical correlation more unexpected than finding a sidecar on a unicycle.

While at first glance this a-bit-out-there association may seem as ill-fitting as an engine in a kayak, our study has unearthed an unforeseen link between the grease-covered hands of motorcycle mechanics and the whimsical, robotic antics of Simone Giertz. It just goes to show, sometimes even the most unrelated entities can roll together with a common thread - or in this case, a common tread.

But hey, it also goes to show, sometimes the greatest discoveries come in the most unexpected places, like finding a spare rib in the glove compartment.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Amidst the hum of motorcycle engines and the buzz of technological innovation, a peculiar connection caught the attention of our research team. As we revved up our curiosity and applied the brakes to any preconceived notions, we found ourselves pondering the inexplicable link between the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and the total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. The seemingly disparate worlds of grease and gadgets collided with unexpected vigor, prompting us to investigate this unexpected correlation.
It is often said that when life throws you a curveball, you should rev your engines and move forward. With that in mind, we delved into the world of statistical analysis, armed with our data and an irrepressible spirit of inquisitiveness. Our pursuit was no wild goose chase - well, maybe a bit wild considering the topic at hand - as we sought to bring to light a correlation that was more unexpected than finding a wrench in a haystack.
When conducting our research, we were acutely aware of the potential for spurious correlations, as we did not want to end up with a study that was as reliable as a broken motorcycle chain. Inploring the depths of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we persisted in our quest, hoping to separate the signal from the noise in this peculiar connection. The fruits of our labor, akin to finding the perfect wrench for a stubborn bolt, revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9735299 and p < 0.01 for the years 2014 to 2022.
Our findings shed light on a curious interplay between the calloused hands of motorcycle mechanics and the whimsical, robotic tinkerings brought forth by Simone Giertz. It seems that beneath the grease and gears, a parallel can be drawn between the artistry of motorcycle maintenance and the mechanical marvels that captivate Giertz's online audience. As we uncovered this correlation, we couldn't help but feel a kinship with those who discover unexpected correlations in their own work, much like finding spare parts in unexpected places.
Stay tuned as we delve further into the mechanics of this unexpected correlation, reminding ourselves that sometimes, even in the world of academia, the most unexpected connections can surprise us like finding a spare rib in the glove compartment.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In a study conducted by Smith and Doe (2018), the remarkable relationship between the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and the total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos was investigated. The findings suggested a correlation coefficient of 0.9735299 and p < 0.01 for the years 2014 to 2022. These results left the researchers as perplexed as finding a can of WD-40 in the kitchen pantry.

Jones (2020) further delved into this enigmatic correlation and uncovered a parallel between the artistry of motorcycle maintenance and the mechanical marvels that captivate Giertz's online audience. The unexpected bond between the grease-covered hands of motorcycle mechanics and the whimsical, robotic antics of Simone Giertz was indeed as surprising as finding a spare rib in the glove compartment.

These serious studies were complemented by relevant books such as "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance" by Robert M. Pirsig and "Makers: The New Industrial Revolution" by Chris Anderson, providing insightful perspectives on the intersection of mechanical craft and technological innovation. In a striking twist, fictional works such as "Zen and the Art of Faking It" by Jordan Sonnenblick and "Boneshaker" by Cherie Priest also offered thematic resonance, albeit with a touch of whimsy and alternate realities.

In addition to scholarly sources, social media posts were also found to contribute to the discourse on this unexpected correlation. A tweet by @GadgetGuruGal stating, "Who would've thought motorcycle mechanics and quirky YouTube robots go together like peanut butter and jelly? #OddCouples" encapsulated the astonishment and amusement that reverberated within the online community.

The unexpected alignment of these seemingly incongruous elements continues to bemuse researchers and enthusiasts alike. As we steer through this uncharted territory of scholarly investigation, it's comforting to remember that in the pursuit of knowledge, sometimes the most enlightening discoveries reveal themselves in the most unexpected places – almost like finding a wrench in a haystack.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and Total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube . You used data from 2014 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Tenuous Tie Between the Tinkerers and Titillating Techies

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to uncovering the unforeseen and the unconventional, our research team embarked on a quest to investigate the unparalleled relationship between the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and the total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. With a twinkle in their eyes and a pocketful of puns, our team delved deep into this enigmatic connection, all the while hoping we wouldn't be driven to madness by the engine of curiosity.

Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and delving into the depths of YouTube analytics, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9735299 and p < 0.01 for the years 2014 to 2022. Surprisingly, our findings suggested that as the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington revved up, so did the total likes on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos, a statistical correlation more unexpected than finding a sidecar on a unicycle.

While at first glance this a-bit-out-there association may seem as ill-fitting as an engine in a kayak, our study has unearthed an unforeseen link between the grease-covered hands of motorcycle mechanics and the whimsical, robotic antics of Simone Giertz. It just goes to show, sometimes even the most unrelated entities can roll together with a common thread - or in this case, a common tread.

But hey, it also goes to show, sometimes the greatest discoveries come in the most unexpected places, like finding a spare rib in the glove compartment.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Amidst the hum of motorcycle engines and the buzz of technological innovation, a peculiar connection caught the attention of our research team. As we revved up our curiosity and applied the brakes to any preconceived notions, we found ourselves pondering the inexplicable link between the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and the total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. The seemingly disparate worlds of grease and gadgets collided with unexpected vigor, prompting us to investigate this unexpected correlation.
It is often said that when life throws you a curveball, you should rev your engines and move forward. With that in mind, we delved into the world of statistical analysis, armed with our data and an irrepressible spirit of inquisitiveness. Our pursuit was no wild goose chase - well, maybe a bit wild considering the topic at hand - as we sought to bring to light a correlation that was more unexpected than finding a wrench in a haystack.
When conducting our research, we were acutely aware of the potential for spurious correlations, as we did not want to end up with a study that was as reliable as a broken motorcycle chain. Inploring the depths of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we persisted in our quest, hoping to separate the signal from the noise in this peculiar connection. The fruits of our labor, akin to finding the perfect wrench for a stubborn bolt, revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9735299 and p < 0.01 for the years 2014 to 2022.
Our findings shed light on a curious interplay between the calloused hands of motorcycle mechanics and the whimsical, robotic tinkerings brought forth by Simone Giertz. It seems that beneath the grease and gears, a parallel can be drawn between the artistry of motorcycle maintenance and the mechanical marvels that captivate Giertz's online audience. As we uncovered this correlation, we couldn't help but feel a kinship with those who discover unexpected correlations in their own work, much like finding spare parts in unexpected places.
Stay tuned as we delve further into the mechanics of this unexpected correlation, reminding ourselves that sometimes, even in the world of academia, the most unexpected connections can surprise us like finding a spare rib in the glove compartment.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unveil the enigmatic connection between the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and the total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos, our research team embarked on a data-driven odyssey, guided by the twin stars of statistical rigor and a penchant for unconventional inquiry. Aligning our methods with the soaring ambition of Giertz's robotic creations, we curated and scrutinized a wealth of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, as well as diving into the depths of YouTube analytics, navigating through the digital landscape with as much care as a rider navigating a bumpy road.

To gauge the size and disposition of the motorcycle mechanics populace, we relied upon the Bureau of Labor Statistics, sorting through their treasure trove of occupational data like a curious child rummaging through a toy chest. Examining the employment figures from 2014 to 2022, we assessed the ebb and flow of this mechanical workforce, accounting for fluctuations with a discerning eye and a dash of wit, all while avoiding getting "wheely" absorbed in our quest.

In parallel, we cast our gaze toward Simone Giertz's YouTube channel, where her whimsical robotics endeavors have garnered a dedicated fan base. Leveraging YouTube analytics, we harvested the total likes from the past eight years, inspired by Giertz's inventive streak and hopeful for a statistically significant revelation that wouldn't leave us feeling like we were stuck in neutral.

With the data in hand, we employed a range of statistical analyses to unravel the potential connection between these seemingly incongruous entities. Through the lens of correlation analysis and regression models, we sought to quantify the extent of the relationship existing between the two variables, proceeding cautiously as if navigating the winding road of statistical inference on a two-wheeled vehicle.

Given the unorthodox nature of our research question, we ensured that our statistical methods were robust against the lurking presence of spurious correlations, lest we fall into the trap of drawing conclusions as flimsy as a motorcycle kickstand on a windy day. Akin to calibrating a finely-tuned engine, we meticulously fine-tuned our models to account for confounding factors and potential lurking variables, aiming to present subtle correlations that are more than mere statistical noise.

Indeed, the journey to unravel this unexpected correlation between the grease-covered hands of motorcycle mechanics and the whimsical, robotic world of Simone Giertz was riddled with twists and turns, not unlike navigating a winding mountain pass on a vintage Harley. But like a bolt expertly threaded into place, our methodology sought to carefully piece together the elements of this unlikely connection, leaving us feeling as triumphant as a biker navigating a hairpin turn with the perfect balance of throttle and finesse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and Total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube .

For the time period 2014 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9735299, r-squared of 0.9477605, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Tenuous Tie Between the Tinkerers and Titillating Techies

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to uncovering the unforeseen and the unconventional, our research team embarked on a quest to investigate the unparalleled relationship between the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and the total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. With a twinkle in their eyes and a pocketful of puns, our team delved deep into this enigmatic connection, all the while hoping we wouldn't be driven to madness by the engine of curiosity.

Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and delving into the depths of YouTube analytics, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9735299 and p < 0.01 for the years 2014 to 2022. Surprisingly, our findings suggested that as the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington revved up, so did the total likes on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos, a statistical correlation more unexpected than finding a sidecar on a unicycle.

While at first glance this a-bit-out-there association may seem as ill-fitting as an engine in a kayak, our study has unearthed an unforeseen link between the grease-covered hands of motorcycle mechanics and the whimsical, robotic antics of Simone Giertz. It just goes to show, sometimes even the most unrelated entities can roll together with a common thread - or in this case, a common tread.

But hey, it also goes to show, sometimes the greatest discoveries come in the most unexpected places, like finding a spare rib in the glove compartment.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Amidst the hum of motorcycle engines and the buzz of technological innovation, a peculiar connection caught the attention of our research team. As we revved up our curiosity and applied the brakes to any preconceived notions, we found ourselves pondering the inexplicable link between the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and the total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. The seemingly disparate worlds of grease and gadgets collided with unexpected vigor, prompting us to investigate this unexpected correlation.
It is often said that when life throws you a curveball, you should rev your engines and move forward. With that in mind, we delved into the world of statistical analysis, armed with our data and an irrepressible spirit of inquisitiveness. Our pursuit was no wild goose chase - well, maybe a bit wild considering the topic at hand - as we sought to bring to light a correlation that was more unexpected than finding a wrench in a haystack.
When conducting our research, we were acutely aware of the potential for spurious correlations, as we did not want to end up with a study that was as reliable as a broken motorcycle chain. Inploring the depths of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we persisted in our quest, hoping to separate the signal from the noise in this peculiar connection. The fruits of our labor, akin to finding the perfect wrench for a stubborn bolt, revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9735299 and p < 0.01 for the years 2014 to 2022.
Our findings shed light on a curious interplay between the calloused hands of motorcycle mechanics and the whimsical, robotic tinkerings brought forth by Simone Giertz. It seems that beneath the grease and gears, a parallel can be drawn between the artistry of motorcycle maintenance and the mechanical marvels that captivate Giertz's online audience. As we uncovered this correlation, we couldn't help but feel a kinship with those who discover unexpected correlations in their own work, much like finding spare parts in unexpected places.
Stay tuned as we delve further into the mechanics of this unexpected correlation, reminding ourselves that sometimes, even in the world of academia, the most unexpected connections can surprise us like finding a spare rib in the glove compartment.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the curious correlation between the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and the total likes on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos for the period 2014 to 2022 yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9735299, an r-squared value of 0.9477605, and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings indicate a remarkably strong positive correlation between these seemingly remote variables, akin to finding top-notch gear oil in a discount bin.

Fig. 1 showcases the scatterplot revealing the robust relationship between the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and the total likes on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos, solidifying our statistical analysis and illustrating the unexpected coherence between these two worlds.

Our research has unveiled an unexpected parallel between the grease-stained fingers of motorcycle mechanics and the whimsical, futuristic ingenuity showcased by Simone Giertz. This revelation is as surprising as finding a worn-out spark plug in a crane game – a testament to the inscrutable yet undeniable bonds that can manifest in the most unlikely places.

This connection, while initially perplexing, offers a reminder that in the vast tapestry of human endeavors, the threads of correlation can intertwine in the most surprising of ways, much like finding misplaced nuts and bolts in a workshop.

Our study holds promise for future investigations into the unanticipated alliances that may lie hidden within diverse fields, boldly demonstrating that sometimes, the keys to interconnectedness can be found in the most unexpected places – not unlike discovering a glove that fits perfectly in the glove compartment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and Total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Tenuous Tie Between the Tinkerers and Titillating Techies

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to uncovering the unforeseen and the unconventional, our research team embarked on a quest to investigate the unparalleled relationship between the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and the total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. With a twinkle in their eyes and a pocketful of puns, our team delved deep into this enigmatic connection, all the while hoping we wouldn't be driven to madness by the engine of curiosity.

Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and delving into the depths of YouTube analytics, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9735299 and p < 0.01 for the years 2014 to 2022. Surprisingly, our findings suggested that as the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington revved up, so did the total likes on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos, a statistical correlation more unexpected than finding a sidecar on a unicycle.

While at first glance this a-bit-out-there association may seem as ill-fitting as an engine in a kayak, our study has unearthed an unforeseen link between the grease-covered hands of motorcycle mechanics and the whimsical, robotic antics of Simone Giertz. It just goes to show, sometimes even the most unrelated entities can roll together with a common thread - or in this case, a common tread.

But hey, it also goes to show, sometimes the greatest discoveries come in the most unexpected places, like finding a spare rib in the glove compartment.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In a study conducted by Smith and Doe (2018), the remarkable relationship between the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and the total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos was investigated. The findings suggested a correlation coefficient of 0.9735299 and p < 0.01 for the years 2014 to 2022. These results left the researchers as perplexed as finding a can of WD-40 in the kitchen pantry.
Jones (2020) further delved into this enigmatic correlation and uncovered a parallel between the artistry of motorcycle maintenance and the mechanical marvels that captivate Giertz's online audience. The unexpected bond between the grease-covered hands of motorcycle mechanics and the whimsical, robotic antics of Simone Giertz was indeed as surprising as finding a spare rib in the glove compartment.
These serious studies were complemented by relevant books such as "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance" by Robert M. Pirsig and "Makers: The New Industrial Revolution" by Chris Anderson, providing insightful perspectives on the intersection of mechanical craft and technological innovation. In a striking twist, fictional works such as "Zen and the Art of Faking It" by Jordan Sonnenblick and "Boneshaker" by Cherie Priest also offered thematic resonance, albeit with a touch of whimsy and alternate realities.
In addition to scholarly sources, social media posts were also found to contribute to the discourse on this unexpected correlation. A tweet by @GadgetGuruGal stating, "Who would've thought motorcycle mechanics and quirky YouTube robots go together like peanut butter and jelly? #OddCouples" encapsulated the astonishment and amusement that reverberated within the online community.
The unexpected alignment of these seemingly incongruous elements continues to bemuse researchers and enthusiasts alike. As we steer through this uncharted territory of scholarly investigation, it's comforting to remember that in the pursuit of knowledge, sometimes the most enlightening discoveries reveal themselves in the most unexpected places – almost like finding a wrench in a haystack.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the curious correlation between the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and the total likes on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos for the period 2014 to 2022 yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9735299, an r-squared value of 0.9477605, and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings indicate a remarkably strong positive correlation between these seemingly remote variables, akin to finding top-notch gear oil in a discount bin.
Fig. 1 showcases the scatterplot revealing the robust relationship between the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and the total likes on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos, solidifying our statistical analysis and illustrating the unexpected coherence between these two worlds.
Our research has unveiled an unexpected parallel between the grease-stained fingers of motorcycle mechanics and the whimsical, futuristic ingenuity showcased by Simone Giertz. This revelation is as surprising as finding a worn-out spark plug in a crane game – a testament to the inscrutable yet undeniable bonds that can manifest in the most unlikely places.
This connection, while initially perplexing, offers a reminder that in the vast tapestry of human endeavors, the threads of correlation can intertwine in the most surprising of ways, much like finding misplaced nuts and bolts in a workshop.
Our study holds promise for future investigations into the unanticipated alliances that may lie hidden within diverse fields, boldly demonstrating that sometimes, the keys to interconnectedness can be found in the most unexpected places – not unlike discovering a glove that fits perfectly in the glove compartment.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our results offer robust support for the prior research conducted by Smith and Doe (2018) and Jones (2020), affirming the remarkable correlation between the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and the total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. This statistically significant association is as unexpected as finding a Harley-Davidson motorcycle in a bicycle rack.

The strength of the correlation coefficient, with a value of 0.9735299, showcases the surprising coherence between these seemingly disparate variables, akin to the unexpected fusion of a sidecar with a unicycle. This finding not only validates previous studies but also emphasizes the potential significance of unexpected connections, much like finding a full toolset in a motorcycle's saddlebag.

Our research underscores the profound parallel between the hands-on craftsmanship of motorcycle maintenance and the innovative, robotic creations that captivate Giertz's online audience. In line with the literature review, these unexpected affinities shed light on the inimitable ways in which seemingly incongruous elements can resonate with one another, not unlike discovering a lug nut in the most unlikely pocket.

Furthermore, our study showcases the potential for insights to emerge from the unlikeliest of places, much like the serendipitous discovery of a pun-worthy threaded fastener in a workshop. As we continue to navigate the uncharted waters of interdisciplinary connections, it becomes increasingly clear that the most unexpected alliances can yield impactful discoveries – almost like stumbling upon a wrench that perfectly fits in a previously overlooked compartment.

In conclusion, our findings offer an intriguing glimpse into the interplay of diverse fields, illuminating the unforeseen correlations that lie beneath the surface. This study not only affirms the unexpected alignment of motorcycle mechanics and Simone Giertz's YouTube videos but also encourages future exploration of unanticipated connections in the ever-evolving landscape of ingenuity and innovation. After all, just as a mechanical repair manual might contain a few unexpected jokes, who's to say that the world of motorcycle mechanics and robotics doesn't harbor its own playful surprises?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and Total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Tenuous Tie Between the Tinkerers and Titillating Techies

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to uncovering the unforeseen and the unconventional, our research team embarked on a quest to investigate the unparalleled relationship between the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and the total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. With a twinkle in their eyes and a pocketful of puns, our team delved deep into this enigmatic connection, all the while hoping we wouldn't be driven to madness by the engine of curiosity.

Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and delving into the depths of YouTube analytics, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9735299 and p < 0.01 for the years 2014 to 2022. Surprisingly, our findings suggested that as the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington revved up, so did the total likes on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos, a statistical correlation more unexpected than finding a sidecar on a unicycle.

While at first glance this a-bit-out-there association may seem as ill-fitting as an engine in a kayak, our study has unearthed an unforeseen link between the grease-covered hands of motorcycle mechanics and the whimsical, robotic antics of Simone Giertz. It just goes to show, sometimes even the most unrelated entities can roll together with a common thread - or in this case, a common tread.

But hey, it also goes to show, sometimes the greatest discoveries come in the most unexpected places, like finding a spare rib in the glove compartment.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Amidst the hum of motorcycle engines and the buzz of technological innovation, a peculiar connection caught the attention of our research team. As we revved up our curiosity and applied the brakes to any preconceived notions, we found ourselves pondering the inexplicable link between the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and the total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. The seemingly disparate worlds of grease and gadgets collided with unexpected vigor, prompting us to investigate this unexpected correlation.
It is often said that when life throws you a curveball, you should rev your engines and move forward. With that in mind, we delved into the world of statistical analysis, armed with our data and an irrepressible spirit of inquisitiveness. Our pursuit was no wild goose chase - well, maybe a bit wild considering the topic at hand - as we sought to bring to light a correlation that was more unexpected than finding a wrench in a haystack.
When conducting our research, we were acutely aware of the potential for spurious correlations, as we did not want to end up with a study that was as reliable as a broken motorcycle chain. Inploring the depths of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we persisted in our quest, hoping to separate the signal from the noise in this peculiar connection. The fruits of our labor, akin to finding the perfect wrench for a stubborn bolt, revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9735299 and p < 0.01 for the years 2014 to 2022.
Our findings shed light on a curious interplay between the calloused hands of motorcycle mechanics and the whimsical, robotic tinkerings brought forth by Simone Giertz. It seems that beneath the grease and gears, a parallel can be drawn between the artistry of motorcycle maintenance and the mechanical marvels that captivate Giertz's online audience. As we uncovered this correlation, we couldn't help but feel a kinship with those who discover unexpected correlations in their own work, much like finding spare parts in unexpected places.
Stay tuned as we delve further into the mechanics of this unexpected correlation, reminding ourselves that sometimes, even in the world of academia, the most unexpected connections can surprise us like finding a spare rib in the glove compartment.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the curious correlation between the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and the total likes on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos for the period 2014 to 2022 yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9735299, an r-squared value of 0.9477605, and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings indicate a remarkably strong positive correlation between these seemingly remote variables, akin to finding top-notch gear oil in a discount bin.
Fig. 1 showcases the scatterplot revealing the robust relationship between the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and the total likes on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos, solidifying our statistical analysis and illustrating the unexpected coherence between these two worlds.
Our research has unveiled an unexpected parallel between the grease-stained fingers of motorcycle mechanics and the whimsical, futuristic ingenuity showcased by Simone Giertz. This revelation is as surprising as finding a worn-out spark plug in a crane game – a testament to the inscrutable yet undeniable bonds that can manifest in the most unlikely places.
This connection, while initially perplexing, offers a reminder that in the vast tapestry of human endeavors, the threads of correlation can intertwine in the most surprising of ways, much like finding misplaced nuts and bolts in a workshop.
Our study holds promise for future investigations into the unanticipated alliances that may lie hidden within diverse fields, boldly demonstrating that sometimes, the keys to interconnectedness can be found in the most unexpected places – not unlike discovering a glove that fits perfectly in the glove compartment.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has not only unveiled a statistically significant correlation between the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and the total likes on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos, but it has also highlighted the unparalleled nature of this peculiar connection. These unexpected findings remind us that even in the realm of statistics, enigmatic relationships can spark curiosity and ignite unexpected discoveries, much like finding a rusty wrench in a toolbox of Legos.

Our study provides insights into the intricate interplay between seemingly disparate domains, offering a refreshing reminder that the most unlikely pairings can converge to form a coherent whole. It seems that amidst the revving engines and futuristic contraptions, the grease-stained hands of motorcycle mechanics and the innovative creations of Simone Giertz share a common thread, emphasizing that in the grand scheme of correlations, sometimes even the most divergent entities can align harmoniously, much like an engine purring in tune.

As we reflect on our findings, we cannot help but appreciate the quirky nature of this correlation, akin to stumbling upon a joke about antilock brakes. While unexpected and, at times, amusing, our research underscores the potential for unearthing meaningful connections in the unlikeliest of places—emphasizing that in the pursuit of understanding, one often encounters surprises that make the journey all the more fascinating.

Therefore, we assert with confidence that further research in this eccentric domain is not necessary. As such, we recommend directing our academic engines toward other unexplored, peculiar territories, embracing the whimsical world of unexpected correlations with open arms, just like a troublesome bolt finally yielding to the perfect wrench.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Tenuous Tie Between the Tinkerers and Titillating Techies. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Innovation Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Tenuous Tie Between the Tinkerers and Titillating Techies. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Whimsical Technology Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Tenuous Tie Between the Tinkerers and Titillating Techies with an abstract of When it comes to uncovering the unforeseen and the unconventional, our research team embarked on a quest to investigate the unparalleled relationship between the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington and the total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos. With a twinkle in their eyes and a pocketful of puns, our team delved deep into this enigmatic connection, all the while hoping we wouldn't be driven to madness by the engine of curiosity.
Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and delving into the depths of YouTube analytics, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9735299 and p < 0.01 for the years 2014 to 2022. Surprisingly, our findings suggested that as the number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington revved up, so did the total likes on Simone Giertz's YouTube videos, a statistical correlation more unexpected than finding a sidecar on a unicycle.
While at first glance this a-bit-out-there association may seem as ill-fitting as an engine in a kayak, our study has unearthed an unforeseen link between the grease-covered hands of motorcycle mechanics and the whimsical, robotic antics of Simone Giertz. It just goes to show, sometimes even the most unrelated entities can roll together with a common thread - or in this case, a common tread.
But hey, it also goes to show, sometimes the greatest discoveries come in the most unexpected places, like finding a spare rib in the glove compartment.

ChatGPT:

Simone Giertz, motorcycle mechanics, Washington, YouTube videos, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, YouTube analytics, statistical correlation, unexpected relationship, connection between motorcycle mechanics and Simone Giertz videos

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of motorcycle mechanics in Washington
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington

Total likes of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total likes of Simone Giertz YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Total likes of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9735299 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9477605 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 94.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total likes of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington) over the 9 years from 2014 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.7E-6. 0.0000096816980589141540000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 0.00097% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 103,288 random variables You don't actually need 103 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.88, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington (Motorcycle Mechanics)260290340440490500400390370
Total likes of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos (Total likes)123541945825872201151920124992016352301132060822841700521




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([260,290,340,440,490,500,400,390,370,])
array_2 = np.array([12354,194582,587220,1151920,1249920,1635230,1132060,822841,700521,])
array_1_name = "The number of motorcycle mechanics in Washington"
array_2_name = "Total likes of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 4899 · Black Variable ID: 15836 · Red Variable ID: 25696
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0